Next-Generation Service Assurance Improves Operational Efficiency
Next-Generation Service Assurance Improves Operational Efficiency
Against the bigger picture goals of wanting to move fault and Q allowing Vodafone D2 to standardize its service assurance;
service management from being resource-centric to customer- Q enabling the introduction of best practices and new
focused, the more detailed aims of Vodafone D2’s Next operational models as part of its service assurance strategy;
Generation Service Assurance (NGSA) were to renew Vodafone Q implementing a new customer management solution;
D2’s service assurance tool chain and to improve the efficiency Q making substantial savings compared with migrating the fault
of related operational processes. This was a huge undertaking, and service management systems separately;
including more than 12 sub-projects, over 1,000 project steps Q costing less both in terms of capital and operational
and a massive number of challenging dependencies – it is the expenditure (CapEx and OpEx);
largest transformation project ever undertaken by Vodafone D2. Q needing fewer staff for the service assurance process
Not only was supporting many legacy fault and service (project and lifecycle);
management systems becoming too difficult, time-consuming Q supporting greater use of automation in the interests of
and expensive, it became clear that a simple upgrade to efficiency and customer satisfaction.
these systems would not be enough to make them effective
in the evolving, key areas of customer, fault and services Putting theory into practice
management. Vodafone D2 used the TM Forum Business Process Framework
Renewing the entire service assurance tool chain was the (eTOM) as the main guidance to ensure a smooth transition
only way it could support future requirements and processes. from resource-centric fault performance management to
Vodafone D2 took the approach of a combined solution for the service assurance combined with service quality management.
three key areas (One-View) and a redesign of the surrounding More specifically, it used the Framework’s definition of
solutions. This approach also gave the company the opportunity assurance and how it spans the main areas that definition
to achieve a number of other improvements at the same time. covers – including Resource Management & Operations, and
They included: Service Management & Operations. In particular, the integration
of the trouble ticketing system was guided by this breaking
Q a means of standardizing and harmonizing the OSS tools down (decomposition) of processes into their components.
it had already for fault and services management across its The Forum’s Information Framework (SID) was used
operating companies; in parallel, to identify Products-Customer Facing Service-
Q reducing the total cost of ownership through a more Resource Facing Service-Resource entities (from which
economic licensing model due to economies of scale; the P-CFS-RFS-R Model was built). This Model was run in