How The Mighty Fall
How The Mighty Fall
How The Mighty Fall
A n d why some c om pa n i es ne v e r g i v e in
Jim Collins
He also has a long history of civic engagement and philanthropy in the National Capital Region
and more recently in Northeast Ohio.
In the early 1970s, Morino co-founded and helped build the Legent Corporation, a software and
services firm that became a market leader and one of the industry’s 10 largest firms by the early
1990s. He retired from the private sector in 1992 and since then his focus has been almost
exclusively in the not-for-profit sector.
I want to take you back to the fall of 1972, when Bill Witzel, who would become my partner,
mentor and still close friend, and I were going through the decision-making involved in starting a
business; including decisions like what we would name the company. We tried putting our names
together, but one of the choices, MorWit, didn't fly too well.
Anyway, one night in Bill's one-room office in Silver Spring, I asked him a question, although I
would not fully grasp the significance of his answer for years to come. I asked, Bill, "What do we
have to worry about? Cut through everything else, and what are our biggest concerns?"
He looked at me and said, "If we fail, we won't have anything to worry about. If we succeed, the
two things you are going to have to learn to deal with are ego and greed. Those two things are
what bring down companies and change people's lives."
We were successful, and the wisdom of his response was prophetic. We had to deal with those traits
many times as entrepreneurs, and I have personally seen firms disrupted and lives damaged
because of ego and greed. Too many times, they have robbed people of the chance to truly enjoy
what they work for and achieve.
Potomac Netpreneur Program Coffee & DoughNets meeting of June 25, 1998
It was particularly interesting to see how Collins handled two "great" companies from previous
work; Circuit City and Fannie Mae; both of which have gone pear shaped. But, Fannie Mae and
current economic issues are not the purpose of the book. In fact, Collins specifically mentions in
the Preface that he purposefully avoided the 2008 financial situation. Instead, the book stems
from his own "curiosity about why some of the greatest companies in history, including some once-
great enterprises we'd researched for ‘Built to Last’ and ‘Good to Great’, had fallen."
“How the Mighty Fall” takes a methodology similar to “Built to Last” and ”Good to Great” and
searches for differences among paired companies.
Loser Winner
A&P Kroger
Addressograph Pitney Bowes
Ames Wal-Mart
Bank of America Wells Fargo
Circuit City Best Buy
Hewlett Packard IBM
Merck Johnson & Johnson
Motorola Texas Instruments
Rubbermaid None qualified
Zenith Motorola
At first, it seems somewhat strange: Motorola is on both sides of the divide and Rubbermaid
doesn't have a winning comparison partner, however on reading the book the partnering becomes
obvious. As in his work before, the analysis relies on public information from that period (such as
annual reports, business journalism articles, and analyst reports).
Collins has asked two related questions: Why do good companies fail? And how does management
respond once a company gets into trouble?
To answer these questions he structured the book around a five-stage model, where steps one and
two address the roots of corporate failure and steps three through five managements’ response to
these stresses.
1
See “Good to Great” for a more detailed explanation of the flywheel, hedgehog and other terms.
SHARE:Data:Marketing Materials:Book reviews:How the mighty fall:HowTheMightyFall.doc 3
How the Mighty Fall
The down-side of the research in this book is, with only eleven pairs of companies, critics quickly
point out that he is drawing a pretty long bow in making a strong case with data claims. However
most are clear that the advice and structure is sound.
On the other hand, the overreaching of a company like Ames Department Stores whose acquisition
of Zaire brought it into direct competition with Wal-Mart, who eventually killed Ames with the
very same low-price business model that Ames had pioneered. Collins cites this as an example of
breaking (Hewlett-Packard's David) Packard's Law: “a great company is more likely to die of
indigestion from too much opportunity than starvation from too little.” Morton Thiokol and
NASA's complicity in the space shuttle Challenger disaster exemplifies what Collins calls "taking
risks below the waterline." Stating that while it's okay for great enterprises to take risks, they must
"avoid big bets that could blow holes below the waterline," potentially sinking the ship. In
“grasping for salvation" Collins shows by hiring the right leader (eg. IBMs Louis Gerstner) brings
focus on the task at hand and righting the ship before settling on a vision and strategy while HP’s
Carly Fiorina is in a hurry and makes too many big missteps.
The messages ……
The messages can be summarised as:
! Whether you prevail or fail, endure or die, depends more on what you do to yourself than
on what the world does to you.
! An institution can look strong on the outside but already be sick on the inside, dangerously
on the cusp of a precipitous fall.
! The signature of the truly great versus the merely successful is not the absence of difficulty,
but the ability to come back from setbacks, even cataclysmic catastrophes, stronger than
before...As long as you never get entirely knocked out of the game, hope always remains.
Is the re more to i t?
Professor Donald Mitchell2 had the advantage of working with some of the companies reviewed by
Collins and he suggests there are 5 additional considerations:
1. Capable continual business model innovators (Kroger, Pitney Bowes, Wal-Mart, Wells
Fargo, Best Buy, IBM, TI, and J & J) outperform those who mostly try to make old
business models more efficient and effective.
2
Chairman, Mitchell and Company; Founder, The 400 Year Project to Advance Global Improvements by 20 Times;
Author, Adventures of an Optimist; Coauthor, The 2,000 Percent Solution, The Ultimate Competitive Advantage.
SHARE:Data:Marketing Materials:Book reviews:How the mighty fall:HowTheMightyFall.doc 4
How the Mighty Fall
2. Companies are more likely to try to do too much and swerve off in weird directions because
the CEO feels insecure (Addressograph, Ames, Bank of America, Merck, Motorola, Scott,
and Zenith) compared to a predecessor and the predecessor's track record (or a competitor
CEO and that CEO's track record) rather than because of excess pride.
3. Denial of risk and peril arrives long before the company's performance peaks
(Addressograph, Ames, Bank of America, Circuit City, Motorola, Scott, and Zenith). It just
shows up as a problem later after a change in the environment causes the company to be
exposed to worse results because of risk than before.
In summary
Whilst Mitchell’s comments are valid and great considerations as you read the book, it not a
reason to ignore the work. If you haven't read “Good to Great”, you might want to before
reading, “How the Mighty Fall”. It isn't essential though as Collins provides a summary in the
appendix. Read Appendix 7 first and you'll be up to speed.
Regardless, this book is a great read for the Christmas break. It is light, well organised and
refreshing. As always, Collins offers sage advice for leaders in all walks of life.
“How the mighty Fall” is available in good bookstores, Amazon and also in audible form
(www.audible.com).