Storage and File Structure
Storage and File Structure
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.2 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Classification of Physical Storage Media
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.3 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Physical Storage Media
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.4 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Physical Storage Media (Cont.)
Flash memory
z Data survives power failure
z Data can be written at a location only once, but location can be
erased and written to again
Can support only a limited number (10K – 1M) of write/erase
cycles.
Erasing of memory has to be done to an entire bank of
memory
z Reads are roughly as fast as main memory
z But writes are slow (few microseconds), erase is slower
z Widely used in embedded devices such as digital cameras,
phones, and USB keys
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.5 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Physical Storage Media (Cont.)
Magnetic-disk
z Data is stored on spinning disk, and read/written magnetically
z Primary medium for the long-term storage of data; typically stores entire
database.
z Data must be moved from disk to main memory for access, and written
back for storage
Much slower access than main memory (more on this later)
z direct-access – possible to read data on disk in any order, unlike
magnetic tape
z Capacities range up to roughly 1.5 TB as of 2009
Much larger capacity and cost/byte than main memory/flash memory
Growing constantly and rapidly with technology improvements (factor
of 2 to 3 every 2 years)
z Survives power failures and system crashes
disk failure can destroy data, but is rare
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.6 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Physical Storage Media (Cont.)
Optical storage
z non-volatile, data is read optically from a spinning disk using
a laser
z CD-ROM (640 MB) and DVD (4.7 to 17 GB) most popular
forms
z Blu-ray disks: 27 GB to 54 GB
z Write-one, read-many (WORM) optical disks used for archival
storage (CD-R, DVD-R, DVD+R)
z Multiple write versions also available (CD-RW, DVD-RW,
DVD+RW, and DVD-RAM)
z Reads and writes are slower than with magnetic disk
z Juke-box systems, with large numbers of removable disks, a
few drives, and a mechanism for automatic loading/unloading
of disks available for storing large volumes of data
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.7 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Physical Storage Media (Cont.)
Tape storage
z non-volatile, used primarily for backup (to recover from disk
failure), and for archival data
z sequential-access – much slower than disk
z very high capacity (40 to 300 GB tapes available)
z tape can be removed from drive ⇒ storage costs much
cheaper than disk, but drives are expensive
z Tape jukeboxes available for storing massive amounts of
data
hundreds of terabytes (1 terabyte = 109 bytes) to even
multiple petabytes (1 petabyte = 1012 bytes)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.8 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Storage Hierarchy
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.9 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Storage Hierarchy (Cont.)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.10 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Magnetic Hard Disk Mechanism
NOTE: Diagram is schematic, and simplifies the structure of actual disk drives
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.11 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Magnetic Disks
Read-write head
z Positioned very close to the platter surface (almost touching it)
z Reads or writes magnetically encoded information.
Surface of platter divided into circular tracks
z Over 50K-100K tracks per platter on typical hard disks
Each track is divided into sectors.
z A sector is the smallest unit of data that can be read or written.
z Sector size typically 512 bytes
z Typical sectors per track: 500 to 1000 (on inner tracks) to 1000 to 2000 (on
outer tracks)
To read/write a sector
z disk arm swings to position head on right track
z platter spins continually; data is read/written as sector passes under head
Head-disk assemblies
z multiple disk platters on a single spindle (1 to 5 usually)
z one head per platter, mounted on a common arm.
Cylinder i consists of ith track of all the platters
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.12 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Magnetic Disks (Cont.)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.13 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Disk Subsystem
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.14 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Disk Subsystem
Disks usually connected directly to computer system
In Storage Area Networks (SAN), a large number of disks are
connected by a high-speed network to a number of servers
In Network Attached Storage (NAS) networked storage provides a
file system interface using networked file system protocol, instead of
providing a disk system interface
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.15 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Performance Measures of Disks
Access time – the time it takes from when a read or write request is issued to
when data transfer begins. Consists of:
z Seek time – time it takes to reposition the arm over the correct track.
Average seek time is 1/2 the worst case seek time.
– Would be 1/3 if all tracks had the same number of sectors, and we
ignore the time to start and stop arm movement
4 to 10 milliseconds on typical disks
z Rotational latency – time it takes for the sector to be accessed to appear
under the head.
Average latency is 1/2 of the worst case latency.
4 to 11 milliseconds on typical disks (5400 to 15000 r.p.m.)
Data-transfer rate – the rate at which data can be retrieved from or stored to
the disk.
z 25 to 100 MB per second max rate, lower for inner tracks
z Multiple disks may share a controller, so rate that controller can handle is
also important
E.g. SATA: 150 MB/sec, SATA-II 3Gb (300 MB/sec)
Ultra 320 SCSI: 320 MB/s, SAS (3 to 6 Gb/sec)
Fiber Channel (FC2Gb or 4Gb): 256 to 512 MB/s
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.16 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Performance Measures (Cont.)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.17 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Optimization of Disk-Block Access
Block – a contiguous sequence of sectors from a single track
z data is transferred between disk and main memory in blocks
z sizes range from 512 bytes to several kilobytes
Smaller blocks: more transfers from disk
Larger blocks: more space wasted due to partially filled blocks
Typical block sizes today range from 4 to 16 kilobytes
Disk-arm-scheduling algorithms order pending accesses to tracks so
that disk arm movement is minimized
z elevator algorithm:
R6 R3 R1 R5 R2 R4
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.18 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Optimization of Disk Block Access (Cont.)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.19 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Optimization of Disk Block Access (Cont.)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.20 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Flash Storage
NOR flash vs NAND flash
NAND flash
z used widely for storage, since it is much cheaper than NOR flash
z requires page-at-a-time read (page: 512 bytes to 4 KB)
z transfer rate around 20 MB/sec
z solid state disks: use multiple flash storage devices to provide
higher transfer rate of 100 to 200 MB/sec
z erase is very slow (1 to 2 millisecs)
erase block contains multiple pages
remapping of logical page addresses to physical page addresses
avoids waiting for erase
– translation table tracks mapping
» also stored in a label field of flash page
– remapping carried out by flash translation layer
after 100,000 to 1,000,000 erases, erase block becomes
unreliable and cannot be used
– wear leveling
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.21 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
RAID
RAID: Redundant Arrays of Independent Disks
z disk organization techniques that manage a large numbers of disks,
providing a view of a single disk of
high capacity and high speed by using multiple disks in parallel,
high reliability by storing data redundantly, so that data can be
recovered even if a disk fails
The chance that some disk out of a set of N disks will fail is much higher than
the chance that a specific single disk will fail.
z E.g., a system with 100 disks, each with MTTF of 100,000 hours (approx.
11 years), will have a system MTTF of 1000 hours (approx. 41 days)
z Techniques for using redundancy to avoid data loss are critical with large
numbers of disks
Originally a cost-effective alternative to large, expensive disks
z I in RAID originally stood for ``inexpensive’’
z Today RAIDs are used for their higher reliability and bandwidth.
The “I” is interpreted as independent
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.22 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Improvement of Reliability via Redundancy
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.25 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
RAID Levels (Cont.)
RAID Level 2: Memory-Style Error-Correcting-Codes (ECC) with bit
striping.
RAID Level 3: Bit-Interleaved Parity
z a single parity bit is enough for error correction, not just
detection, since we know which disk has failed
When writing data, corresponding parity bits must also be
computed and written to a parity bit disk
To recover data in a damaged disk, compute XOR of bits
from other disks (including parity bit disk)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.26 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
RAID Levels (Cont.)
RAID Level 3 (Cont.)
z Faster data transfer than with a single disk, but fewer I/Os per
second since every disk has to participate in every I/O.
z Subsumes Level 2 (provides all its benefits, at lower cost).
RAID Level 4: Block-Interleaved Parity; uses block-level striping,
and keeps a parity block on a separate disk for corresponding
blocks from N other disks.
z When writing data block, corresponding block of parity bits must
also be computed and written to parity disk
z To find value of a damaged block, compute XOR of bits from
corresponding blocks (including parity block) from other disks.
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.27 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
RAID Levels (Cont.)
RAID Level 4 (Cont.)
z Provides higher I/O rates for independent block reads than Level 3
block read goes to a single disk, so blocks stored on different
disks can be read in parallel
z Provides high transfer rates for reads of multiple blocks than no-
striping
z Before writing a block, parity data must be computed
Can be done by using old parity block, old value of current block
and new value of current block (2 block reads + 2 block writes)
Or by recomputing the parity value using the new values of
blocks corresponding to the parity block
– More efficient for writing large amounts of data sequentially
z Parity block becomes a bottleneck for independent block writes
since every block write also writes to parity disk
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.28 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
RAID Levels (Cont.)
RAID Level 5: Block-Interleaved Distributed Parity; partitions data and
parity among all N + 1 disks, rather than storing data in N disks and
parity in 1 disk.
z E.g., with 5 disks, parity block for nth set of blocks is stored on disk
(n mod 5) + 1, with the data blocks stored on the other 4 disks.
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.29 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
RAID Levels (Cont.)
RAID Level 5 (Cont.)
z Higher I/O rates than Level 4.
Block writes occur in parallel if the blocks and their parity
blocks are on different disks.
z Subsumes Level 4: provides same benefits, but avoids bottleneck
of parity disk.
RAID Level 6: P+Q Redundancy scheme; similar to Level 5, but
stores extra redundant information to guard against multiple disk
failures.
z Better reliability than Level 5 at a higher cost; not used as widely.
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.30 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Choice of RAID Level
Factors in choosing RAID level
z Monetary cost
z Performance: Number of I/O operations per second, and
bandwidth during normal operation
z Performance during failure
z Performance during rebuild of failed disk
Including time taken to rebuild failed disk
RAID 0 is used only when data safety is not important
z E.g. data can be recovered quickly from other sources
Level 2 and 4 never used since they are subsumed by 3 and 5
Level 3 is not used anymore since bit-striping forces single block
reads to access all disks, wasting disk arm movement, which
block striping (level 5) avoids
Level 6 is rarely used since levels 1 and 5 offer adequate safety
for most applications
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.31 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Choice of RAID Level (Cont.)
Level 1 provides much better write performance than level 5
z Level 5 requires at least 2 block reads and 2 block writes to write
a single block, whereas Level 1 only requires 2 block writes
z Level 1 preferred for high update environments such as log disks
Level 1 had higher storage cost than level 5
z disk drive capacities increasing rapidly (50%/year) whereas disk
access times have decreased much less (x 3 in 10 years)
z I/O requirements have increased greatly, e.g. for Web servers
z When enough disks have been bought to satisfy required rate of
I/O, they often have spare storage capacity
so there is often no extra monetary cost for Level 1!
Level 5 is preferred for applications with low update rate,
and large amounts of data
Level 1 is preferred for all other applications
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.32 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Hardware Issues
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.33 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Hardware Issues (Cont.)
Latent failures: data successfully written earlier gets damaged
z can result in data loss even if only one disk fails
Data scrubbing:
z continually scan for latent failures, and recover from copy/parity
Hot swapping: replacement of disk while system is running, without power
down
z Supported by some hardware RAID systems,
z reduces time to recovery, and improves availability greatly
Many systems maintain spare disks which are kept online, and used as
replacements for failed disks immediately on detection of failure
z Reduces time to recovery greatly
Many hardware RAID systems ensure that a single point of failure will not
stop the functioning of the system by using
z Redundant power supplies with battery backup
z Multiple controllers and multiple interconnections to guard against
controller/interconnection failures
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.34 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Optical Disks
Compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM)
z Removable disks, 640 MB per disk
z Seek time about 100 msec (optical read head is heavier and slower)
z Higher latency (3000 RPM) and lower data-transfer rates (3-6 MB/s)
compared to magnetic disks
Digital Video Disk (DVD)
z DVD-5 holds 4.7 GB , and DVD-9 holds 8.5 GB
z DVD-10 and DVD-18 are double sided formats with capacities of 9.4
GB and 17 GB
z Blu-ray DVD: 27 GB (54 GB for double sided disk)
z Slow seek time, for same reasons as CD-ROM
Record once versions (CD-R and DVD-R) are popular
z data can only be written once, and cannot be erased.
z high capacity and long lifetime; used for archival storage
z Multi-write versions (CD-RW, DVD-RW, DVD+RW and DVD-RAM)
also available
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.35 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Magnetic Tapes
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.36 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
File Organization, Record Organization
and Storage Access
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.37 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
File Organization
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.38 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Fixed-Length Records
Simple approach:
z Store record i starting from byte n ∗ (i – 1), where n is the size of
each record.
z Record access is simple but records may cross blocks
Modification: do not allow records to cross block boundaries
Deletion of record i:
alternatives:
z move records i + 1, . . ., n
to i, . . . , n – 1
z move record n to i
z do not move records, but
link all free records on a
free list
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.39 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Deleting record 3 and compacting
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.40 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Deleting record 3 and moving last record
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.41 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Free Lists
Store the address of the first deleted record in the file header.
Use this first record to store the address of the second deleted record,
and so on
Can think of these stored addresses as pointers since they “point” to
the location of a record.
More space efficient representation: reuse space for normal attributes
of free records to store pointers. (No pointers stored in in-use records.)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.42 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Variable-Length Records
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.43 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Variable-Length Records: Slotted Page Structure
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.44 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Organization of Records in Files
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.45 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Sequential File Organization
Suitable for applications that require sequential processing of
the entire file
The records in the file are ordered by a search-key
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.46 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Sequential File Organization (Cont.)
Deletion – use pointer chains
Insertion –locate the position where the record is to be inserted
z if there is free space insert there
z if no free space, insert the record in an overflow block
z In either case, pointer chain must be updated
Need to reorganize the file
from time to time to restore
sequential order
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.47 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Multitable Clustering File Organization
Store several relations in one file using a multitable clustering
file organization
department
instructor
multitable clustering
of department and
instructor
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.48 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Multitable Clustering File Organization (cont.)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.49 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Data Dictionary Storage
The Data dictionary (also called system catalog) stores
metadata; that is, data about data, such as
Information about relations
z names of relations
z names, types and lengths of attributes of each relation
z names and definitions of views
z integrity constraints
User and accounting information, including passwords
Statistical and descriptive data
z number of tuples in each relation
Physical file organization information
z How relation is stored (sequential/hash/…)
z Physical location of relation
Information about indices (Chapter 11)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.50 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.51 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Relational Representation of System Metadata
Relational
representation on
disk
Specialized data
structures
designed for
efficient access, in
memory
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.52 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Storage Access
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.53 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Buffer Manager
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.54 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Buffer-Replacement Policies
Most operating systems replace the block least recently used
(LRU strategy)
Idea behind LRU – use past pattern of block references as a
predictor of future references
Queries have well-defined access patterns (such as sequential
scans), and a database system can use the information in a user’s
query to predict future references
z LRU can be a bad strategy for certain access patterns involving
repeated scans of data
For example: when computing the join of 2 relations r and s
by a nested loops
for each tuple tr of r do
for each tuple ts of s do
if the tuples tr and ts match …
z Mixed strategy with hints on replacement strategy provided
by the query optimizer is preferable
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.55 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Buffer-Replacement Policies (Cont.)
Pinned block – memory block that is not allowed to be written
back to disk.
Toss-immediate strategy – frees the space occupied by a block
as soon as the final tuple of that block has been processed
Most recently used (MRU) strategy – system must pin the
block currently being processed. After the final tuple of that block
has been processed, the block is unpinned, and it becomes the
most recently used block.
Buffer manager can use statistical information regarding the
probability that a request will reference a particular relation
z E.g., the data dictionary is frequently accessed. Heuristic:
keep data-dictionary blocks in main memory buffer
Buffer managers also support forced output of blocks for the
purpose of recovery (more in Chapter 16)
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.56 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
End of Chapter 10
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.58 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Figure 10.18
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.59 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Figure in-10.1
Database System Concepts - 6th Edition 10.60 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan