B5 - IEEE ACM Professional Code of Conduct
B5 - IEEE ACM Professional Code of Conduct
1. PUBLIC — Software engineers shall act consistently with the public interest.
2. CLIENT AND EMPLOYER — Software engineers shall act in a manner that is in the
best interests of their client and employer consistent with the public interest.
3. PRODUCT — Software engineers shall ensure that their products and related
modifications meet the highest professional standards possible.
PREAMBLE
The short version of the code summarizes aspirations at a high level of the abstraction; the clauses
that are included in the full version give examples and details of how these aspirations change the
way we act as software engineering professionals. Without the aspirations, the details can become
legalistic and tedious; without the details, the aspirations can become high sounding but empty;
together, the aspirations and the details form a cohesive code.
PREAMBLE
Computers have a central and growing role in commerce, industry, government, medicine,
education, entertainment and society at large. Software engineers are those who contribute by direct
participation or by teaching, to the analysis, specification, design, development, certification,
maintenance and testing of software systems. Because of their roles in developing software systems,
software engineers have significant opportunities to do good or cause harm, to enable others to do
good or cause harm, or to influence others to do good or cause harm. To ensure, as much as
possible, that their efforts will be used for good, software engineers must commit themselves to
making software engineering a beneficial and respected profession. In accordance with that
commitment, software engineers shall adhere to the following Code of Ethics and Professional
Practice.
The Code contains eight Principles related to the behavior of and decisions made by professional
software engineers, including practitioners, educators, managers, supervisors and policy makers, as
well as trainees and students of the profession. The Principles identify the ethically responsible
relationships in which individuals, groups, and organizations participate and the primary
obligations within these relationships. The Clauses of each Principle are illustrations of some of the
obligations included in these relationships. These obligations are founded in the software engineer’s
humanity, in special care owed to people affected by the work of software engineers, and the
unique elements of the practice of software engineering. The Code prescribes these as obligations of
anyone claiming to be or aspiring to be a software engineer.
It is not intended that the individual parts of the Code be used in isolation to justify errors of
omission or commission. The list of Principles and Clauses is not exhaustive. The Clauses should
not be read as separating the acceptable from the unacceptable in professional conduct in all
practical situations. The Code is not a simple ethical algorithm that generates ethical decisions. In
some situations standards may be in tension with each other or with standards from other sources.
These situations require the software engineer to use ethical judgment to act in a manner which is
most consistent with the spirit of the Code of Ethics and Professional Practice, given the
circumstances.
Ethical tensions can best be addressed by thoughtful consideration of fundamental principles, rather
than blind reliance on detailed regulations. These Principles should influence software engineers to
consider broadly who is affected by their work; to examine if they and their colleagues are treating
other human beings with due respect; to consider how the public, if reasonably well informed,
would view their decisions; to analyze how the least empowered will be affected by their decisions;
and to consider whether their acts would be judged worthy of the ideal professional working as a
software engineer. In all these judgments concern for the health, safety and welfare of the public is
primary; that is, the "Public Interest" is central to this Code.
The dynamic and demanding context of software engineering requires a code that is adaptable and
relevant to new situations as they occur. However, even in this generality, the Code provides
support for software engineers and managers of software engineers who need to take positive
action in a specific case by documenting the ethical stance of the profession. The Code provides an
ethical foundation to which individuals within teams and the team as a whole can appeal. The Code
helps to define those actions that are ethically improper to request of a software engineer or teams
of software engineers.
The Code is not simply for adjudicating the nature of questionable acts; it also has an important
educational function. As this Code expresses the consensus of the profession on ethical issues, it is a
means to educate both the public and aspiring professionals about the ethical obligations of all
software engineers.
PRINCIPLES
Principle 1: PUBLIC
Software engineers shall act consistently with the public interest. In particular, software
engineers shall, as appropriate:
1.02. Moderate the interests of the software engineer, the employer, the client
and the users with the public good.
1.03. Approve software only if they have a well-founded belief that it is safe,
meets specifications, passes appropriate tests, and does not diminish quality of
life, diminish privacy or harm the environment. The ultimate effect of the work
should be to the public good.
1.06. Be fair and avoid deception in all statements, particularly public ones,
concerning software or related documents, methods and tools.
2.02. Not knowingly use software that is obtained or retained either illegally or
unethically.
2.03. Use the property of a client or employer only in ways properly authorized,
and with the client's or employer's knowledge and consent.
2.04. Ensure that any document upon which they rely has been approved, when
required, by someone authorized to approve it.
2.06. Identify, document, collect evidence and report to the client or the
employer promptly if, in their opinion, a project is likely to fail, to prove too
expensive, to violate intellectual property law, or otherwise to be problematic.
2.07. Identify, document, and report significant issues of social concern, of which
they are aware, in software or related documents, to the employer or the client.
2.08. Accept no outside work detrimental to the work they perform for their
primary employer.
Principle 3: PRODUCT
Software engineers shall ensure that their products and related modifications meet the
highest professional standards possible. In particular, software engineers shall, as
appropriate:
3.01. Strive for high quality, acceptable cost and a reasonable schedule, ensuring
significant tradeoffs are clear to and accepted by the employer and the client,
and are available for consideration by the user and the public.
3.02. Ensure proper and achievable goals and objectives for any project on which
they work or propose.
3.03. Identify, define and address ethical, economic, cultural, legal and
environmental issues related to work projects.
3.04. Ensure that they are qualified for any project on which they work or
propose to work by an appropriate combination of education and training, and
experience.
3.05. Ensure an appropriate method is used for any project on which they work
or propose to work.
3.06. Work to follow professional standards, when available, that are most
appropriate for the task at hand, departing from these only when ethically or
technically justified.
3.07. Strive to fully understand specifications for software on which they work.
3.08. Ensure that specifications for software on which they work have been well
documented, satisfy the users’ requirements & have the appropriate approvals.
3.10. Ensure adequate testing, debugging, and review of software and related
documents on which they work.
3.12. Work to develop software and related documents that respect the privacy
of those who will be affected by that software.
3.13. Be careful to use only accurate data derived by ethical and lawful means,
and use it only in ways properly authorized.
3.14. Maintain integrity of data, being sensitive to outdated.
3.15 Treat all forms of software maintenance with the same professionalism as
new development.
Principle 4: JUDGMENT
Software engineers shall maintain integrity and independence in their professional
judgment. In particular, software engineers shall, as appropriate:
4.01. Temper all technical judgments by the need to support and maintain
human values.
4.02 Only endorse documents either prepared under their supervision or within
their areas of competence and with which they are in agreement.
4.04. Not engage in deceptive financial practices such as bribery, double billing,
or other improper financial practices.
4.05. Disclose to all concerned parties those conflicts of interest that cannot
reasonably be avoided or escaped.
Principle 5: MANAGEMENT
Software engineering managers and leaders shall subscribe to and promote an ethical
approach to the management of software development and maintenance . In particular,
those managing or leading software engineers shall, as appropriate:
5.01 Ensure good management for any project on which they work, including
effective procedures for promotion of quality and reduction of risk.
5.02. Ensure that software engineers are informed of standards before being held
to them.
5.03. Ensure that software engineers know the employer's policies and
procedures for protecting passwords, files and information that is confidential to
the employer or confidential to others.
5.04. Assign work only after taking into account appropriate contributions of
education and experience tempered with a desire to further that education and
experience.
5.06. Attract potential software engineers only by full and accurate description of
the conditions of employment.
5.09. Ensure that there is a fair agreement concerning ownership of any software,
processes, research, writing, or other intellectual property to which a software
engineer has contributed.
5.11. Not ask a software engineer to do anything inconsistent with this Code.
5.12. Not punish anyone for expressing ethical concerns about a project.
Principle 6: PROFESSION
Software engineers shall advance the integrity and reputation of the profession
consistent with the public interest. In particular, software engineers shall, as
appropriate:
6.05. Not promote their own interest at the expense of the profession, client or
employer.
6.06. Obey all laws governing their work, unless, in exceptional circumstances,
such compliance is inconsistent with the public interest.
6.10. Avoid associations with businesses and organizations which are in conflict
with this code.
6.11. Recognize that violations of this Code are inconsistent with being a
professional software engineer.
6.12. Express concerns to the people involved when significant violations of this
Code are detected unless this is impossible, counter-productive, or dangerous.
Principle 7: COLLEAGUES
Software engineers shall be fair to and supportive of their colleagues. In particular,
software engineers shall, as appropriate:
7.01. Encourage colleagues to adhere to this Code.
7.03. Credit fully the work of others and refrain from taking undue credit.
7.06. Assist colleagues in being fully aware of current standard work practices
including policies and procedures for protecting passwords, files and other
confidential information, and security measures in general.
7.07. Not unfairly intervene in the career of any colleague; however, concern for
the employer, the client or public interest may compel software engineers, in
good faith, to question the competence of a colleague.
7.08. In situations outside of their own areas of competence, call upon the
opinions of other professionals who have competence in that area.
Principle 8: SELF
Software engineers shall participate in lifelong learning regarding the practice of their
profession and shall promote an ethical approach to the practice of the profession. In
particular, software engineers shall continually endeavor to:
8.1. Further their knowledge of developments in the analysis, specification,
design, development, maintenance and testing of software and related
documents, together with the management of the development process.
8.2. Improve their ability to create safe, reliable, and useful quality software
at reasonable cost and within a reasonable time.
Executive Committee: Donald Gotterbarn (Chair), Keith Miller and Simon Rogerson;
Members: Steve Barber, Peter Barnes, Ilene Burnstein, Michael Davis, Amr El-Kadi, N.
Ben Fairweather, Milton Fulghum, N. Jayaram, Tom Jewett, Mark Kanko, Ernie
Kallman, Duncan Langford, Joyce Currie Little, Ed Mechler, Manuel J. Norman,
Douglas Phillips, Peter Ron Prinzivalli, Patrick Sullivan, John Weckert, Vivian Weil, S.
Weisband and Laurie Honour Werth.
This Code may be published without permission as long as it is not changed in any
way and it carries the copyright notice. Copyright (c) 1999 by the Association for
Computing Machinery, Inc. and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
Inc.