COURSE GUIDE

Course: Educ 321 Assessment in Semester: 1st School Year: 2021-2022

Learning 2
Instructor: Shiela B. Pelicano, PhD
Course Description:
This is a course that focuses on the principles, development and utilization of
alternative forms of assessment in measuring authentic learning. It emphasizes on how to
assess process and product-oriented learning outcomes as affective learning. Students will
experience how to develop rubrics and other assessment tools for performance-based and
product-based assessment.

Course Outline
TOPIC REFERENCES
Unit I 21st Century Assessment Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Lesson 1 Characteristics of 21st Century Greenstein, L. (2012)
Assessment Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2000)
Lesson 2 Instructional Decisions in Assessment Nitko, A.J. (2001)
Lesson 3 Outcome-based Assessment Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher
Education
Report form the Department of
Research, Evaluation, and Assessment
https://sph.uth.edu/content/uploads/201
2/01/Competencies-and-Learning-
Objectives.pdf.
http://www.teaching.utoronto.ca/topic/c
oursedesign/learning-outcome
Unit II Types of Assessment Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Lesson 1 Traditional and Authentic Assessment Biggs, J. and tang, C. (2011)
Lesson 2 Formative Evaluation and Summative Mueller, J. (2010)
Evaluation Popham, W. J. (2011)
Lesson 3 Norm and Criterion-Referenced McMillan, J.H. (2007)
Assessment Practical Assessment, Research and
Lesson 4 Contextualized and Decontextualized Evaluation, A Peer Reviewed
Assessment Electronic Journal, Volume 17, No 2,
Lesson 5 Analytic and Holistic Assessment January 2012
http://jonathan.muelller.faculty.noctri.ed
u/toolbox/index.htm
www.eric.ed.gov
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kghx3kbl734
-en
SUMMATIVE TEST
Unit III Nature of Performance-Based Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Assessment Popham, W. J. (2011)
Lesson 1 Meaning and Characteristics Musial, D., et.al. (2009)
Lesson 2 Types of Performance Tasks Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher
Lesson 3 Strengths and Limitations Education
http://rel.sagepub.com/content/42/2/16
7

Borongan City 6800

Eastern Samar, Philippines
[email protected]
https://essu.edu.ph
 Unit IV Designing Meaningful Performance- Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Based Assessment Popham, W. J. (2011)
Lesson 1 Designing the purpose of Assessment Musial, D., et.al. (2009)
Lesson 2 Identifying Performance Tasks Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher
Lesson 3 Developing Scoring Schemes Education
Report from the Department of
Research, Evaluation, and Assessment
http://rel.sagepub.com/content/42/2/16
7
Unit V Affective Learning Competencies Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Lesson 1 Importance of Affective Targets Tanner, D.E. (2001)
Lesson 2 Affective Traits and Learning Targets Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., &
Lesson 3 Affective Domain of the taxonomy of Marsia. (1964)
Educational Objectives http://ets.tlt.psu.edu/learningdesign/ass
essment/affective

Unit VI Development of Affective Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)

Assessment Tools Popham, W. J. (2011)
Lesson 1 Methods of Assessing Affective McMillan, J.H. (2007)
Targets Burke, K. (2009)
Lesson 2 Utilizing the Different Methods or http://www.teaching.utoronto.ca/topic/c
Combination of Methods in Assessing Affect oursedesign/learning-outcome
Lesson 3 Affective Assessment Tools http://www.baker.edu/departments/etl/
main.cfm
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Unit VII Nature of Portfolio Assessment Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Lesson 1 Purposes Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2000)
Lesson 2 Types Airasian, P. W. (2000)
Lesson 3 Elements Musial, D., et.al. (2009)
Journal in Assessment & Evaluation in
Higher Education. Routledge and tailor
Group
International Journal of Academic
Research
www.sciencedirect.com
www.elsiever.com/locate/EDUREV
www.rubistar.4teachers.org
Unit VIII Designing and Evaluating Portfolio Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Assessment in the Classroom Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2000)
Lesson 1 Steps for Developing Portfolio Nitko, A.J. (2001)
Assessment Journal in Assessment & Evaluation in
Lesson 2 Portfolio Evaluation Higher Education. Routledge and tailor
Group
International Journal of Academic
Research
www.sciencedirect.com
www.elsiever.com/locate/EDUREV
www.rubistar.4teachers.org

SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Borongan City 6800
Eastern Samar, Philippines
[email protected]
https://essu.edu.ph
 Unit IX Grading and Reporting System Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Lesson 1 K to 12 Grading of Learning Outcome Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E., (2000)
Lesson 2 The effects of Grading Parents understanding of their
Lesson 3 Building a Grading and Reporting children’s report card grades. Applied
System Measurement in Education.
Lesson 4 Developing Effective Reporting http://www.teaching.utoronto.ca/topic/c
System oursedesign/learning-outcome
Lesson 5 Tools for Comprehensive Reporting http://researchnetwork.pearson.com/wp
System _content/uploads/Assessing_21st_Cen
Lesson 6 Guidelines for Better Practice tury_Skills_NCME.pdf
Lesson 7 Planning and Implementing Parent-
Teacher Conference
Unit X Statistics and Computer: Tools for Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014)
Analyzing of Assessment data Brase, C.H. & Brase, C.P. (2012)
Lesson 1 statistics Guskey, T. R. & Bailey, J. M. (2001)
Lesson 2 Descriptive and Inferential Statistics Popham, W. J. (2011)
Lesson 3 Statistical Tools for: Grouped and Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E., (2000)
Individual Data
Lesson 4 Computer: Aid in statistical computing
and data presentation
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Course Learning Outcomes Required Output

After completed the module, the Activities per lesson

students are expected to meet the Summative Assessment
following: Major Examinations (Midterm and Finals)
1. Use appropriate assessment
tools and techniques as
applied in instructional
decision;
2. Relate learning outcomes and
assessment;
3. Distinguish the different types
of assessment and relate it
learning outcomes;
4. Analyze the nature and
essential characteristics of
performance-based
assessment;
5. Develop a portfolio of
performance-based
assessment tools that
measures learners’
competencies of a given
subject.
6. Craft affective learning
outcome for the different
levels in the affective domain;

Borongan City 6800

Eastern Samar, Philippines
[email protected]
https://essu.edu.ph
 7. Construct instruments for
measuring the different levels
in the affective domain.
8. Develop and evaluate portfolio
assessment utilized in the
classroom;
9. Develop skills in preparing and
interpreting grades; and
10. Utilize processed data and
results in reporting and
interpreting learners’
performance.

Course Policies Grading System

1. All students are required to 1. There will be two major examinations:
answer and submit all the Midterm and Finals which will comprise
activities and assessment in 40% of the grade.
every unit on or before the due 2. Activities, assessments, and requirements
date. However, late found in the module will comprise 60%.
submission will be accepted 3. The grade will be computed as follows:
but with demerit points. Activities and assessments - 60%
2. All the answers/output of the Major Examinations - 40%
activities and unit assessment 4. The general average will be computed
must be written or encoded from the midterm grade and final grade.
using MS Office or WPS and
submit in the Google
Classroom provided for this
class.
3. Students are encouraged to
contact their instructors.
Contact details can be found
in this course guide.
References:
Brase, C.H. & Brse, C. P. (2012) Basic Statistics.
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th Edition.
Burke, K. (2009). How to assess authentic learning. 5 th edition.
Cajigal, R.M. & Mantuano, M.D. (2014). Assessment of Learning 2. Adriana Publishing
Company, Q.C.
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills. A guide to evaluating mastery and
authentic learning.
Guskey, T.R. & Bailey, J.M. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for student
learning.
Kratwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives,
Handbook II: Affective Domain.
Kubiszyn, T. & Borich G. (2003). Educational Testing and Measurement: Classroom
application and practice.
McMillan, J.H. (2007). Classroom Assessment: Principles and practice for effective
standards-based instruction. 4th edition.
Mueller, J. (2010). Authentic Assessment Toolbox.
Musial, D., et.al. (2009). Foundation of Meaningful Educational Assessment.
Borongan City 6800
Eastern Samar, Philippines
[email protected]
https://essu.edu.ph
 Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S.M. (2011). Boston: Pearson.
Popham, W.J. (2000). Modern Educational Measurement: Practical Guidelines for
Educational Leaders, 2nd Edition.
Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E., (2000). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. 8 th
edition.
Tanner, D. E. (2001). Assessing Academic Achievement.

Online References:
http://www.teaching.utoronto.ca/topic/coursedesign/learning-outcome
http://researchnetwork.pearson.com/wp_content/uploads/Assessing_21st_Century_Skills_
NCME.pdf
www.sciencedirect.com
www.elsiever.com/locate/EDUREV
www.rubistar.4teachers.org
http://www.baker.edu/departments/etl/main.cfm
http://ets.tlt.psu.edu/learningdesign/assessment/affective
http://rel.sagepub.com/content/42/2/167
http://jonathan.muelller.faculty.noctri.edu/toolbox/index.htm
www.eric.ed.gov
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kghx3kbl734-en
https://sph.uth.edu/content/uploads/2012/01/Competencies-and-Learning-Objectives.pdf.

Journal References:
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Report form the Department of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment
Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, A Peer Reviewed Electronic Journal,
Volume 17, No 2, January 2012
Consultation Schedule:
Monday and Wednesday 9:00-10:30 AM (BEED 3)
Tuesday and Thursday 9:00-10:30 AM (BSED 3)
Email address: [email protected]

Prepared by: Approved:

SHIELA B. PELICANO, PhD ROWENA A. CATUDAY, EdD

Instructor Head, BSED Program

Borongan City 6800

Eastern Samar, Philippines
[email protected]
https://essu.edu.ph