2020 State of The Profession
2020 State of The Profession
2020 State of The Profession
State of the
Profession
2020
Citation Guide
Respondents largely began the 2020-2021 school year with all virtual (43%) or hybrid
virtual/in-person (39%) classes, and they have seen their responsibilities change as a result,
especially following up with students who haven’t participated in virtual classes. Additionally,
school counselors report taking a number of measures to address racism and bias, including
monitoring student behavior to identify racist behavior or speech, providing individual
counseling and providing classroom lessons.
Methodology
The research was conducted via an electronic survey using the Qualtrics platform. An email
invitation with a unique link to the survey site was sent to 74,451 members and nonmembers
and yielded 7,000 responses, for an overall response rate of 9.4%. The data is inclusive of
practicing school counselors only. Research of other school counseling roles, including faculty,
will be conducted at a later date. All 50 states, as well as some U.S. territories, are represented
in the responses. The statistical universe measured in the survey is derived from a universe of
approximately 110,000 U.S. school counselors. Responses were calculated at the 95% confidence
level with a margin of error of +/- 1%, which is well within the acceptable range of 95% +/- 5%.
Respondent Demographics
Overall, 87% of respondents are school counselors, while 3% are building-level directors/
coordinators/building supervisors. The remaining 10% of respondents hold other job roles and
were not included in this survey. Overall, 85% hold a master’s in school counseling and 12%
hold a master’s degree in another discipline. Three percent hold doctorate degrees. In terms of
certifications, 78% hold NCC, 20% hold NBCT and 16% NCSC. Three quarters of respondents
are ASCA members.
Respondent Race/
Asian, 1%
Ethnicity
Two or more Prefer not to say, 4%
races, 3%
Latinx, 5%
Black or African
American, 10%
Respondent Race/
Asian, 1%
Ethnicity
Two or more Prefer not to say, 4%
races, 3%
Latinx, 5%
White, 77%
Black or African
American, 10%
Most respondents are female (87%), 11% are male, less than 1% are nonbinary/third gender
Respondent Age
and 2% prefer not to say. More than nine in>60,
10 6%
are heterosexual, 2% are gay or lesbian, 2% are
bisexual, less than 1% note a different identity, and 5% prefer not to say.
Overall, 38% are 40 or younger, 31% are 41–50, 24% are 51-60 and 6% are 61 or older. Similarly,
20% have been working as school
51-60, 24% counselors for five or fewer years,
White, <40,22%
77% 38% for 6–10 years, 18% for
11–15 years, 14% for 16–20 years and 18% for 20–plus years.
Respondent Age
>60, 6%
Urban, 24.1%
Rural, 31.2%
41-50, 31%
Type
ASCA 2020of Location
STATE-OF-THE-PROFESSION STUDY
International, 0.4% DoDEA, 0.1%
4
School Characteristics
Thirty-two percent of respondents work in elementary schools, another 32% work in high
schools and 21% work in middle schools. Another 13% work in multilevel schools and 3% point
to other categories. Nearly nine in 10 respondents work for public, non-charter schools (88%),
White, 77%
5% work for public charter schools and 5% work for private/independent/parochial schools.
In terms of location type, 42% work in suburban areas, 31% in rural and 24% in urban, rising to
48% among respondents who are Black41-50,
or African
31%
American and 41% of Latinx. Much smaller
percentages (one percent or fewer) are full-time virtual, international, DoDEA or other.
Urban, 24.1%
Rural, 31.2%
Suburban, 41.5%
Respondents’ Caseloads
All Respondents Elementary School
Middle School High School
35% 33%
31% 31%
30% 28%
25% 26%
25% 24% 25% 24% 25%
20% 20%
20%
17%
15%
15%
12% 12% 11%
10% 8% 9%
5% 4%
0%
250 or fewer 251–350 351–450 451–550 More than
students students students students 550 students
When reported ratios are disaggregated by school level, ratios are also comparable to national
Perception
medians of School
(national averagesCounselor Role for this measure due to available national data).
are less accurate
To a Great Extent Adequately
The national median ratio for K–8 is 708:1 vs. 212:1 for 9–12. Fortunately, small numbers of
respondents report having responsibility for more than 750 students (5% overall).
Students 21% 53%
Parents/families 4% 31%
Student Demographics
In terms of student demographics, the largest percentage of respondents (28%) report that more
than three quarters of students in their school receive free/reduced rate lunch, rising to 35%
among elementary school counselors; 13%, 0%-15% ofSuburban,
students; 14%, 16%–30% of students;
41.5%
14%, 31%–45% of students; 16%, 46%–60% of students; and 10%, 61%–75% of students.
31-45%, 14%
61-75%, 10%
46-60%, 15%
A majority of respondents (59%) report 15% or fewer students are English-language learners,
Fall 2020 School Year:
while 18% report 16%–30% of students are ELLs and 19% report 31% or more of students are
How Classes Began In-Person, 13%
ELLs, rising to 33% among school counselors in urban area schools.
Other, 5%
Most-Significant Challenges
Not surprisingly, respondents indicate that having access to students in a virtual
All Virtual, 43% environment
(68% rate extremely challenging/challenging) is their biggest day-to-day challenge at work,
followed by providing counseling and lessons to students in a virtual environment (62%).
Majorities are also challenged by managing high caseloads (53%) and closing opportunity and
achievement gaps (51%). Findings are similar regardless of whether respondents’ schools began
the year as virtual, hybrid or in person, with the exception that slightly more than 50% find
Hybrid, 39%
having access to students in a virtual environment and providing counseling and lessons to
students in a virtual environment extremely challenging/challenging.
90% 84%
78% 80% 79%
80%
69%
70%
60%
ASCA 2020 STATE-OF-THE-PROFESSION
50% STUDY 7
40% 31%
30% 22% 20% 20%
20% 15%
Day-to-Day Challenges
Rating Extremely Challenging/Challenging All Respondents
Having access to students in a virtual environment 68%
Providing counseling and lessons to students in a virtual environment 62%
Managing high caseload/number of students 53%
Closing opportunity and achievement gaps 51%
Being assigned inappropriate duties 39%
Ensuring administrators understand the school counselor role 38%
Participating in professional development appropriate for school counseling 38%
Providing training and resources for teachers/staff 37%
Accessing adequate school and community mental health resources for referrals to students and parents 36%
Providing short-term counseling to support students’ mental health needs 36%
Collecting/analyzing student data 34%
Keeping up with new technologies 31%
Incorporating anti-racism practices/ pedagogy/curriculum in the school counseling program 30%
Finding time for professional development 29%
Responding to students in crisis 29%
Having access to students in a regular school environment (pre-COVID-19) 27%
Addressing school/district policies that result in institutional discrimination 25%
Hiring of inadequately or improperly trained school counselors 13%
Survey respondents also mentioned several other challenges, such as funding for school counselor
resources, responsibility for 504 case management and caring for their own mental health.
31-45%, 14%
Issues Related to COVID-19
61-75%,the
Only 13% of respondents began 10%2020–2021 school year with in-person classes. The largest
percentage, 43%, began with all virtual classes, while 39% began the year with a hybrid virtual/
46-60%, 15%
in-person schedule. Another 6% point to other situations.
Other, 5%
Hybrid, 39%
As a result of the pandemic, job responsibilities have changed for most respondents. For
Respondents’ Involvement in Crisis
example,
Planning73%andfollow up with students
Response Team who have not participated in virtual classes; 53% follow
up with students who have not returned since schools reopened;Yes 48%Noparticipate in attendance/
check-ins; 45%
90% have increased responsibility
84% regarding SEL implementation; and 34% have
78% 80% 79%
new/additional
80% duties before/after school, bus/hall/lunch duty, etc. These additional duties vary
69%
70%
somewhat based on how respondents’ schools began the 2020–2021 school year. For example,
60%
47% of school50%
counselors who started the year in person are involved in additional duties
before/after40%school, bus/hall/lunch duty, etc. And, compared with31%
in-person school counselors,
30%
all virtual school counselors are more likely to have
22% 20%increased responsibility regarding
20% SEL
20% 15%
implementation
10%
(48% vs. 38%).
0%
All Respondents Elementary Middle High Multi-level
Respondents’ Caseloads
All Respondents Elementary School
Middle School High School
35% 33%
31% 31%
30% 28%
25% 26%
25% 24% 25% 24% 25%
20% 20%
20%
17%
15%
15%
12% 12% 11%
ASCA10%
2020 STATE-OF-THE-PROFESSION STUDY 8% 9% 9
5% 4%
0%
Suburban, 41.5%
working 12–15 hours per day, including weekends,” a respondent says. “The day never ends,” says
another. “Very few boundaries. Difficult to reach students when we can’t speak with them during class.”
Asked if they are part of a crisis planning and response team for natural disasters, school
Hybrid, 39%
violence, suicide risk assessment, etc., 77% respondent yes, while 23% responded no.
Respondents who work in high schools are less likely than elementary and middle school
counselors to be part of a crisis planning and response team.
90% 84%
78% 80% 79%
80%
69%
70%
60%
50%
40% 31%
30% 22% 20% 20%
20% 15%
10%
0%
All Respondents Elementary Middle High Multi-level
Respondents’
ASCA Caseloads STUDY
2020 STATE-OF-THE-PROFESSION 10
All Respondents Elementary School
Middle School High School
35% 33%
Commenting on their crisis planning team, respondents indicate the team serves a number
of roles – from dangerous situations to student risk assessments. “Student services and
administrators meet each week to discuss collaborative efforts for student and family support.
Protocols for crises are discussed and reviewed with the entire staff,” a respondent notes.
Unfortunately, several survey respondents indicate that while a team is in place, it doesn’t meet
regularly. And among those who say they aren’t part of a crisis planning team, teams either don’t
exist or school counselors aren’t included. “All school counselors are asked for input for certain
areas, but not officially on the team,” a respondent comments.
Additionally, 22% say they are using data to identify students who should be included in most
rigorous coursework; 20%, providing parent information, education or outreach; 19%, providing
in-service training for staff; and 15%, providing small-group counseling.
Other actions taken include “updating schoolwide materials to reflect diversity and teach about
bias and discrimination,” “prepared in-service training with my school psychologist,” “started
an equity leadership professional learning community that meets twice a month,” and other
actions. In comments, however, a number of respondents point to lack of support for these
efforts, for example, “I have communicated with my administrators the need for addressing
this matter but I am being told to wait.” Another notes, “[I’m] attempting more staff training.
Sometimes [it’s] a struggle at current institution.” Additionally, several comments reveal
a segment of school counselors lack an understanding of systemic racism and their role in
educating students.
As the chart indicates, some differences appear among demographic groups. For example, 59%
of elementary school counselors (vs. 35% of the full sample) are providing classroom lessons
to address racism and bias in their school counseling program and 46% of middle school
counselors (vs. 38%) of the full sample are providing individual counseling. Recognized ASCA
Model Program (RAMP) status also has some bearing on anti-racism and bias efforts. Thirty
percent of respondents with the RAMP designation are identifying and advocating to revise or
remove policies that disproportionately affect students of color (vs. 23% of non-RAMP schools),
39% are using data to identify students who should be included in the most rigorous coursework
(vs. 22% of non-RAMP schools) and 27% are providing in-service training for school staff (vs.
19% of non-RAMP schools). A school counselor’s race/ethnicity appears to be less of a factor in
these efforts.
Survey respondents were also asked how their schools or districts are supporting and promoting
diversity, equity, inclusion and access this year. Respondents indicate their schools/districts
have adapted by requiring diversity, equity and inclusion training for all faculty (34%),
incorporating diversity, equity and inclusion in student curriculum (27%) and created positions
for diversity, equity and inclusion specialists (16%). Ten percent have changed policies and
Other actions taken by schools include “invited an outside agency to help facilitate discussion,”
“district launched an equity department, which has promoted the equity tenet in various formats
for all district personnel, students and families” and started a “blook club on several books
related to white privilege and institutional racism in education,” for example.
In the categories of direct student services, respondents spend an average of 28% of their time
in counseling, followed by instruction (17%), as the chart that follows indicates. Findings are
similar among grade levels, although elementary school counselors spend significantly more
time on direct instruction compared with middle and high school counselors. Conversely, high
school counselors spend more time in appraisal and advisement. These are positive findings,
indicating that school counselors, on average, spend nearly 80% of their time in direct and
indirect student services (74%), as recommended in the ASCA National Model.
About eight in 10 respondents report their school counseling program has not received the
Recognized ASCA Model Program designation, 4% have a current RAMP designation, about one
percent previously earned the designation but it’s now expired and 15% are unsure.
Given the current environment, respondents were asked if they have spent more time on social/
emotional development over the past 12 months. Nearly two-thirds of respondents (63%)
indicate they are spending more time on SEL, while 29% have spent about the same amount of
time/emphasis and 8% have spent less.
20% 20%
20%
17%
15%
15%
12% 12%
Perception
10%
of School Counselor Role 11%
8% 9%
Confusion about the role of school counselors continues to be an issue, according to 4%
5%
respondents. Asked to what extent particular demographic groups/roles understand the role
0%
of school counselors,
250 or fewer respondents assign the highest
251–350 351–450score to administrators
451–550 (27%
Moreunderstand
than
students students students students 550 students
the role to a great extent; 42% adequately), followed by students (21% to a great extent; 53%
adequately) and teachers/school staff (19% to a great extent; 48% adequately).
Parents/families 4% 31%
It’s clear that continued advocacy is needed to support appropriate school counselor roles,
especially among families and the general public. “I work in a rural, small district and it seems
like no one really understands the point of my job,” a respondent comments.
It’s important to acknowledge that this research was collected during an atypical year. The
global COVID-19 pandemic, as well as educators’ renewed attention to addressing racism and
bias, created increased social and emotional learning needs, as well as new and increased job
responsibilities. School counselors responded, adapting to new ways of learning and increasing
their advocacy to ensure success for all students.
School counselors understand their role in creating an inclusive and supportive school culture
where all students can thrive. When schools counselors are empowered and provided the tools
to support students’ social and emotional development, academic success and post-secondary
planning through a school counseling program, student outcomes improve.