Chapter I
The Problem and Its Setting
In this chapter represents the background information of the study, the problem
encountered towards the study, significance of the study, and the limits towards the
study.
Background of the Study
Increase in the population over the last century lead to the increase of the energy
consumption worldwide. The expansion of petroleum products joined with consumption
of these stored mineral oil prompted the advancement of eco-accommodating ideas.
Everywhere throughout the world, governments have supported the use of alternative
sources of energy for dominating energy crisis. The higher cost of oil has pulled the
greater attention to biofuels, especially bioethanol. Moreover, it was stressed out that
crude oil is no longer considered as renewable energy.
In spite of this, some businesses interest and research proceeds with in light of
the abundance of crude materials and the prediction that the energy economics will
change the not so distant future to support bioethanol. Bioethanol is a promising
sustainable power source, eco-accommodating and causes most extreme decrease of
negative natural effects produced by the overall use of fossil fuels.
In this context, the researchers focuses on the extraction of bioethanol on
marang Seeds.
Statement of the Problem
The study was conducted to extract bioethanol from marang seeds.
Specifically, it aimed to provide answers to the following questions:
1. What is the percentage of the alcohol content produced from each sample?
1.1 S1 (Control) = Distilled water + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial
yeast
1.2 S2= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 10g commercial yeast
1.3 S3= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial yeast
1.4 S4= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 30g commercial yeast
2. What are the significant differences between the control and the following
samples?
2.1 S1 (Control) = Distilled water + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial
yeast
2.2 S2= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 10g commercial yeast
2.3 S3= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial yeast
2.4 S4= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 30g commercial yeast
3. At what sample does the wasted Marang seeds produced the highest
percentage of alcohol content.
3.1 S1 (Control) = Distilled water + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial
yeast
3.2 S2= 400 ml of hydrolysed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 10g commercial yeast
3.3 S3= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial yeast
3.4 S4= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 30g commercial yeast
4. At what sample does the hydrolysed marang seeds shows the greatest
potential in producing bioethanol?
4.1 S1 (Control) = Distilled water + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial
yeast
4.2 S2= 400 ml of hydrolysed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 10g commercial yeast
4.3 S3= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial yeast
4.4 S4= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 30g commercial yeast
Hypotheses
Null
The produced bioethanol from marang seeds has low percentage of alcohol.
Alternative
The produced bioethanol from marang seeds has very high percentage of alcohol.
Significance of the Study
The study aimed to produce bioethanol using wasted Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds by extracting the bioethanol from marang seeds and determining
its alcohol content. Also, the study was conducted to provide baseline information about
its significance in our society or community. To the community, the result of the study
helped to add the economic value of the marang seeds and to find an alternative source
of bioethanol which is from the wasted marang seeds.
Scope and Limitation
The study was limited only on the production of ethanol from marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds through the process of hydrolysis, fermentation and distillation.
And by determining its alcohol content. The study used the process of distillation after
the hydrolysis and fermentation subjecting the mixture into four trials S 1 (Control) =
Distilled water + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial yeast, S 2= 400 ml of hydrolyzed
mixture of Marang (Artocarpus odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 10g
commercial yeast ,S3= 400 ml of hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus
odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado + 20g commercial yeast, S4= 400 ml of
hydrolyzed mixture of Marang (Artocarpus odoratissimus) seeds + 20g Muscuvado +
30g commercial yeast
The study was limited only on the percentage of the alcohol present in each
sample.
Operational Definition of Terms
The definition of terms is for the benefit of the reader’s understanding. The terms
are defined based on how it was used in the study.
Amylase- any member of a class of enzymes that catalyse the hydrolysis of starch into
smaller carbohydrate molecules such as maltose.
Bioethanol- an ethanol derived exclusively from the fermentation of plant starches. The
main goal of the study is to produce bioethanol.
Distillation- the process of separating liquid. The objective of the study is to separate
the liquids based on the differences of their volatility.
Fermentation- the breakdown of pyruvic acid without the use of oxygen also known as
anaerobic respiration.
Hydrolysis- a process defined as the chemical reaction where something reacts with
water and is changed into new substance. Hydrolysis is used for water separation.
Starch- a carbohydrate that is the chief form of stored energy in plants, especially
wheat, corn, rice, and potatoes mixture of two different polysaccharides built out of
glucose units, and forms a white, tasteless powder when purified.
Saccharification- the process of breaking a complex carbohydrate (as starch) into
simple sugars.
Sugar- a sweet crystalline substance obtained from various plants, especially sugar
cane and sugar beet, consisting essentially of sucrose, and used as a sweetener in food
and drink.
Yeast - enzymes chemically breakdown the sugars into products that the cell can used.
Yeast is used to manufacture ethanol through fermentation.
Chapter II
Review of Related Literature
This chapter presents related studies of the problem in hand. This gives
additional background information to support the study. It tackles about the potential of
wasted Marang (Artocarpus odoratissimus) seeds extract as a source of bioethanol.
Marang (Artocarpus odoratissimus)
Artocarpus odoratissimus, otherwise known as Marang fruit, is a rich source of
energy and contains tidy sum of saccharide eventually broken into glucose. Packed with
protein and fat, it is also known as athlete’s fruit and are very much compatible to the
banana. Moreover they are also rich in protein, fat, sugar, carbohydrates, ash, calcium,
phosphorous, smoothing iron, crude fiber, retinol, Beta -carotene, nicotinic acid,
thiamine, lactoflavin, and Vitamin A and C. Marang fruit is a tree in the mulberry and fig
family Moraceae. It is native to Borneo, Palawan, and Mindanao Island, and is closely
related to the jackfruit, cempedak, and breadfruit trees which all belong to the same
genus, Artocarpus odoratissimus. It grows to 25 meters (82 ft.) tall. The leaves are 16–
50 cm long and 11–28 cm broad, similar to the Breadfruit's, but are a little less lobed.
Many trees lose the leaf lobbing once mature. The appearance of the fruit can be
regarded as an intermediate shape between the jackfruit and the breadfruit. It is round
to oblong, 15–20 cm long and 13 cm broad and weighing about 1 kg. The thick rind is
covered with soft, broad spines. They become hard and brittle as the fruit matures.
When fully mature the expanding arils stretch the outer rind which often appears lumpy,
especially if not all seeds was pollinated (Fahad, 2015).
Bioethanol
Bioethanol is used in fuel industry as an additive for petrol. The most common
blend in 90% petrol and 10% ethanol. Bioethanol is completely comprised of biological
products, such as the combustion of bioethanol results in cleaner combustion (CO2,
steam and heat). Carbon dioxide is absorbed by plants through the process of
photosynthesis to help the plant grow. This cycle of reaction and energy combustion
means bioethanol could potentially be a carbon neutral fuel source (Pirolini, 2015).
Ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass follows the process of (a)
hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose; (b) sugar fermentation; (c) separation of lignin
residue and, (d) recovery and purifying the ethanol to meet fuel specifications. They
added that the task of hydrolyzing lignocellulose to fermentable monosaccharides is still
technically problematic because the digestibility of cellulose is hindered by many
physico-chemical, structural and compositional factors. Owing to these structural
characteristics, pretreatment is an essential step for obtaining potentially fermentable
sugars in the hydrolysis step. They explained that the purpose of the pretreatment is to
break down the lignin structure and disrupt the crystalline structure of cellulose for
enhancing enzymes accessibility to the cellulose during hydrolysis step (Mosier ET. Al,
2005).
Put simply, bioethanol is energy made from living matter, usually plants.
Bioethanol, biodiesel, and biogas are types of biofuels. Bioethanol are considered
renewable energies, emit less than fossil fuels, and have received increasing attention
in the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Ethanol is the most generally utilized fluid biofuel. It is a liquor and is matured
from sugars, starches or from cellulosic biomass. Cellulosic materials can be utilized to
create bioethanol. Bioethanol speaks to a critical, sustainable fluid fuel for engine
vehicles. Creation of bioethanol from biomass is one approach to lessen both the
utilization of unrefined petroleum and natural contamination. Change advances for
delivering ethanol from cellulosic biomass assets, for example, woodland materials,
agrarian build-ups and urban squanders are being worked on and have not yet been
shown economically. Keeping in mind the end goal to create bioethanol from cellulosic
biomass, a pre-treatment procedure is utilized to decrease the example measure,
separate the hemicelluloses to sugars, and open up the structure of the cellulose
segment. The cellulose partition is hydrolyzed by acids or compounds into glucose
sugar that is aged to bioethanol. The sugars from the hemicelluloses are likewise aged
to bioethanol. The utilization of bioethanol as an engine fuel has as long a history as the
auto itself. It started with the utilization of ethanol in the interior ignition motor (Saini,
2014)
Enzymatic Hydrolysis
Grohmann and Bothast (1997) examined a consecutive saccharification of
polysaccharides in corn fiber by treatment with weaken sulfuric corrosive at 100– 160
°C took after by incomplete balance and enzymatic hydrolysis with blended cellulase
and amyloglucosidase chemicals at 45 °C. The successive treatment accomplished
high (roughly 85%) change of all polysaccharides in the corn fiber. In any case, the
arrangement of mixes inhibitory to fermentative microorganisms turned out to be
promptly clear at all pretreatments tried at 140 and 160 °C.
The effect of the enlightenment with white straightly enraptured light (WLPL) of
two financially accessible cellulases from Trichoderma reesei on their movement in
hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose was examined. Chemicals were enlightened with
WLPL for 60 min and 120 min and for every local and lit up protein test particular
movement and energy of catalyst catalyzed hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose were
built up. Sub-atomic weight Mw and radii if gyration Rg of protein chains of local and lit
up compounds were estimated by methods for high weight measure exclusion
chromatography combined with multiangle laser light disseminating and refractometric
identifiers (HPSEC-Shopping centers RI). Compliances of protein chains of local and lit
up compounds were assessed based on their round dichroism (Album) spectra. Also,
sub-atomic weight Mw and radii of gyration Rg of polysaccharide chains of
microcrystalline cellulose local and processed for 10 min, 480 min and 1440 min with
unique and WLPL invigorated proteins WT and TR were taken. Light with WLPL of both
cellulases examined did not change auxiliary structures of protein particles of local
chemical. Atomic weight Mw and radii of gyration Rg of enlightened chemicals varied
extraordinarily from those found for local compounds. Enlightenment of compounds
prompted increment of particular action and rate constants of response of hydrolysis
microcrystalline cellulose catalyzed by lit up proteins as contrasted and local chemicals
(Polit et.al, 2012).
Saccharification
The hydrolysis of polysaccharides to solvent sugars is called "saccharification".
Malt produced using grain is utilized as a wellspring of β-amylase to separate starch into
the disaccharide maltose, which can be utilized by yeast to create brew. Other amylase
chemicals may change over starch to glucose or to oligosaccharides.
Making sugar from the starch saves. In this administration the diastatic chemicals
begin following up on the starches, separating them into sugars. The amylases are
compounds that work by hydrolyzing the straight chain bonds between the individual
glucose atoms that make up the starch chain. A solitary straight chain starch is called
an amylose. An extended starch chain is called an amylopectin. These starches are
polar particles and have distinctive finishes. An amylopectin contrasts from an amylose
by having an alternate sort of atomic bond at the branch point, which isn't influenced by
the diastatic catalysts (John, 2015).
Ordinary technique utilized for the generation of bioethanol from cassava starch
for the most part requires the fundamental gelatinization step took after by liquefaction
and saccharification. The sugar shaped amid these procedures is additionally matured
utilizing either yeast or microscopic organisms. Since, starch got from any plant source
is a perplexing atom, it require different hydrolytic chemicals for its transformation into
basic fermentable sugars. Among numerous extracellular hydrolases accessible,
microbial amylases are as often as possible utilized for its change. For business
creation of amylases Aspergillus and Rhizopus species are viewed as most critical
sources on the grounds that the proteins from these sources are by and large the most
able and are accessible in extreme amounts. Despite several advantages of
simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using multiple organisms, there are also
few shortcomings (Sidra et.al, 2014).
Ethanol Fermentation
Sugar from plant material is converted into ethanol and carbon dioxide by
fermentation. The enzymes found in single-celled fungi (yeast) are the natural catalysts
that can make this process happen (Bitesize, 2014).
Ethanol (C2H5OH) is a light alcohol and is a volatile, colourless, flammable liquid
with a characteristic odour. It is also known as ethyl alcohol and often abbreviated as
EtOH. The most common way of production is the fermentation of sugar or starch from
agricultural crops by yeasts or bacteria. Ethanol can either be used as high blend (E85)
in dedicated flex-fuel vehicles, or as low blend in most current vehicles without
modifications. The blending rate is usually up to 10%.The feedstock for ethanol
production can be any material containing appreciable amounts of sugar or substances
that can be converted to sugar. Conventional production uses sugar, starch or other
polysaccharides. The production process of second generation ethanol, also called
cellulosic alcohol, uses cellulosic feed stock which require further pretreatment. In a
fermentation process sugar is converted to ethanol by microbes, which are inoculated to
the feedstock. The monosachharides originate either directly from disaccharides, which
are broken up via invertase enzymes, or from starch which is hydrolysed with amylase
enzymes. In addition to ethanol, water and carbon dioxide are produced also
(Bioenergy, 2014).
Ethanol Production
The Philippines as of late documented a yearly biofuels report with the USDA
Outside Agrarian Administration's Worldwide Farming Data System, taking note of
ethanol generation is relied upon to increment through one year from now because of
the development of limit. As indicated by the report, there were eight ethanol plants
working in the Philippines a year ago with a consolidated limit of 222 million liters (58.65
million gallons). The country created 168 million liters of ethanol a year ago, up 46
percent when contrasted with the 115 million liters delivered in 2014. Sugarcane and
molasses are as of now utilized as ethanol feedstocks in the nation. Two extra ethanol
plants started activities not long ago, including one recently built ethanol plant and a
consumable liquor maker that started delivering fuel ethanol. Together, the offices have
a yearly limit of 60 million liters. This year, ethanol generation is again anticipated that
would develop, achieving 266 million liters, up roughly 58 percent when contrasted with
2015. Limit use is required to reach 94 percent this year, up 76 percent from a year ago.
In 2017, another ethanol plant is relied upon to start activities, bringing the aggregate
number of ethanol plants to 11. The extra 40 million liters of limit is relied upon to build
by and large limit in the nation to 322 million liters. The Philippines government at
present expects ethanol to contain 10 percent of the aggregate yearly volume of fuel
disseminated by oil organizations in the nation. The nation at present means to build the
mix level 20 percent in 2020 and 85 percent in 2025. The report likewise shows the
ethanol imports in the Philippines fell a year ago, basically because of expanded
neighbourhood generation. Fuel ethanol imports, which achieved 339 million liters in
2014, fell 8 percent a year ago, achieving 311 million liters. Imports from the U.S. fell by
an expected 28 percent, from 246 million liters in 2014 to 178 million liters in 2015. The
U.S., be that as it may, in any case represented 57 percent of aggregate fuel ethanol
imports a year ago, down from 73 percent in 2014 (Erin,2016).