Impact of Intermediaries in The Fish Marketing Process
Impact of Intermediaries in The Fish Marketing Process
Impact of Intermediaries in The Fish Marketing Process
Abstract:
This study is based on the role and influence of the intermediaries in the overall fish
marketing process. It also focuses on the price differences caused by those intermediaries.
Some suggestions on how to eliminate these intermediaries are also recommended. With the
help of this report, the farmers will be able to get higher wages and the consumers will be
able to pay fair prices for the fishes they purchase.
1. Introduction:
With the age old tradition, the fishery sector is providing almost one-eighth [12.05%] of the
entire population of Bangladesh with the opportunity to earn their livelihood (Journal of
social sciences, 2006). Thus the importance of fishery sector is apparent in the economic
development of the country. Throughout the year, various types of fishes are being cultivated
by the fishermen. The availability of fish at the right time at the right place is at the heart of
the success in fish marketing. Fishermen are hardly involved in process. Their responsibility
is confined to catching fishes only.
In the fish market, fishermen are not getting proper benefit due to the intervention of
intermediaries. Fishermen hardly have storage facility and due to the perishable nature of
fish, they are bound to sell fish at lower price. On the other hand, the consumers have to pay
higher prices for the fishes at local markets.
1
1.1 Purpose of this study
The study was conducted with the main objective of tracking “The Intermediaries in
Fish Marketing and their influence on price difference”. Other than this, the study will also
focus on:
◊ The functions of the intermediaries
◊ The profit margins consumed by the intermediaries
The salient feature of fish marketing system and three fish marketing areas,
urban, suburban and rural fish market and the pond fish marketing system of
Bangladesh have been studied in Comilla. [Chowdhury M.H. 2004].
The reasons for price difference between fishermen and consumers, i.e,
transportation, personal expenses, aratder’s commission, market tolls, and
wastages and many other sectors are described from a study in Chuadanga (2002).
By taking the insights of these studies, this study was conducted on the specific roles
of the intermediaries, their functions in the market place, the ways of and reasons for price
rise, and price differences in fish marketing channel of Gopalganj district.
2
2. Materials and Methods
A rigorous attempt was undertaken to mine the true fact from dawn to dusk. The
fieldwork started in the morning when the fishes were brought to market and were sold to
other intermediaries either in a bidding process or through bargaining. In the market, all the
intermediaries were available and this is why maximum time was spent there. In Gopalganj
district, there is a government operated fisheries in Gohata Thana. The manager of fisheries
and Local pond owners were interviewed according to their leisure. The end consumers were
interviewed while they were either entering or leaving the marketplace.
2.2 Sample
To conduct the study, a total of 50 samples are taken. Out of these, 10 retailers were
interviewed, as they have direct contact with the consumers. To check the validity and
reliability of the information, 10 consumers were interviewed. Retailers purchase fishes
mostly from the Aratdar [fish businessman]. Thus 5 Aratdars were also interviewed. Many
small retailers collect fishes either from Foriyas [those who catch fish in others’ ponds] or
directly from the fishermen. Thus, 10 fishermen and 5 foriyas were interrogated. The foriyas
used to get fishes from local pond owners. This is why, 8 pond owners were also visited.
3
2.4 Data type
The paper is mainly focusing the fish marketing process in Gopalganj district. No
such study is conducted there previously. All the data collected from the field is primary in
nature. As there is no secondary data available in this topic about this region, web search and
literatures of other regions are studied.
4
3.2.2 Fishery
Gopalganj has a government owned fishery at Gohata Thana. The fishery contains 10
ponds in which almost all types of fishes, related to this study, are being cultivated. The
fishery is responsible for the reproduction of fishes. The fishery has 2 ponds, one for big
fishes and another for small fishes, where the mother fishes are kept to lay eggs. These eggs
are then hatched in another pond. When the fishes are born, usually called RENU or PONA,
these are sold, in thousands, to ARATDAR, who then cultivates the fish.
3.2.4 Intermediaries
There is a small number of intermediary operating in the fish marketing process in
Gopalganj. But their impact is very much crucial.
i. Foriya
Foriya is a local term of Gopalganj. It generally indicates small group of
people used to earn their living by catching fishes in others’ ponds. They then bring
the fishes to local market. They sell the fishes either directly to the consumers or to
the retailers. They usually sell the fishes in a measure of every pot basis {HARI}.
ii. Retailer
Retailers exist at the last corner of the marketing process. They sell directly to
the consumers. They collect fishes either from the foriyas or from the aratdars. They
purchase small and mixed {PANCH MISHALI} fishes from the foriyas in a
measurement of every pot {HARI}. They collect big fishes from aratdar in a bidding
process. The retailer who bids highest takes title to the fish to sell in the market. More
discussion on the bidding process is given later. One exception from these two is that,
sometimes retailers are seen to be selling sea-fishes, tortoises, and crabs. They collect
these from the fishermen.
5
The scope and activity of rural aratdar is simply astonishing. They are
responsible for bridging the gap between the fishermen and the retailers. They
organize a bidding environment. At the same time, many of them purchase RENU
from fisheries and cultivate fish. Many of them send fishes to urban aratdars. These
rural aratdars do not sell directly to the consumer. They work as intermediaries. They
receive a commission [usually 3% of the bidding price] for their job.
6
Fisheries Fishermen Local Pond Owner
Foriya
Urban Aratdar
{Divisional city/ Dhaka/ Other Retailer Ultimate Consumer
part of the country}
Name of Price for Commission For Price for Price for Price Difference Profit
Fishes Fishermen/Foriya [BDT] Aratdar [BDT] Retailer [BDT] Consumer [BDT] [BDT] Margin[%]
Ayir 400/kg 750/kg 900/kg 150/kg 20
Boyal 200/kg 500/kg 600/kg 100/kg 20
Ilish [small] 160/kg Based 300/kg 400/kg 100/kg 33
Ilish [medium] 220/kg 400/kg 600/kg 200/kg 50
Ilish [large] 300/kg on 620/kg 800/kg 180/kg 29
Katol 100/kg 200/kg 250/kg 50/kg 25
Koi [small] 120/24 pcs the 200/24 pcs 300/24 pcs 100/24 pcs 50
Koi [large] 150/24 pcs 350/24 pcs 600/24 pcs 250/24 pcs 72
Minar Carp 60/kg Bidding 112.5/kg 120/kg 7.5/kg 7
Mrigel 80/kg 125/kg 150/kg 25/kg 20
Process
Nola 80/kg 110/kg 120/kg 10/kg 9
Pangash 60/kg 87.5/kg 100/kg 12.5/kg 15
Ruhi [small] 80/kg 130/kg 150/kg 20/kg 15
Ruhi [large] 140/kg 250/kg 300/kg 50/kg 20
Silver Carp 50/kg 80/kg 90/kg 10/kg 12.5
3.6 Price differences
From the table given, it is apparent that the fishermen are the least beneficial and the
consumers are most survivors. The profit margin set by each of the intermediaries depend
almost their own will. The price difference in each layer is described below:
7
In most of the cases, price difference between fishermen and consumer
is almost doubled. In some cases, it is more than this. The reasons behind this
increase are – transportation cost, storage cost, bidders’ commission, market co-
operative subscription, and the most significant the profusion and demand for
the fishes.
The profit margin for Carp fishes, Nola, and Pangash are very low. The
reasons behind this are – pond owners get these fishes on their ponds, these
fishes are grow up very quickly, and are highly available.
The margin for Ayir, Boyal, and Mrigel are equal. Ayir and Boyal
fishes are very expensive and consumed by some consumers or consumed
occasionally. Thus the price is kept charging a minimum margin to encourage
purchase.
The margin for Koi is highest due to its overall demand. The people of
Gopalganj need Koi fishes at their dining table twice/thrice in a week. Though
most of them get Koi fish in their own ponds, the size matters the price increase.
In case of Ilish and Rui, no specific reason is found for increased price.
The Padma River is close to the district that provides Ilish. Both own cultivated
and imported Ruhi fishes are available in the market. However, price is high. It
is nothing but due to the syndicate grouping of parties involved in the process.
The profit margin of Aratdar is not confined to the commission earned
through bidding process only. They charge their functional and operational costs
also.
The profit margin of retailers is set solely by themselves. This is why
not even aratdars can get a share of this increased price.
8
4. Limitations of the study
This paper is not free from limitations. A deep attention is put while preparing the
paper. So, flaws related to study may not be found. However, some limitations are there:
1) The price rise is caused by the middlemen. The number of middlemen is not very
high. But their impact is very influencing. Thus, what can be done is to distribute the
marketing function to different intermediaries. Then a fixed amount can be set to
compensate those functions.
2) A fixed commission for the aratdars is a must. This may result in fair treatment of
fishermen of different fishes.
3) The involvement of syndicated group of people must be resisted in order to keep the
price stable according to what the retailers actually want to pay.
4) The willingness of the retailers to set and charge prices must be brought into a fixed
rate of profit margin based on the type, nature, availability, size, and consumer
preference of the fishes.
9
5) The rates set for aratdars and retailers must be informed to both the fishermen and the
consumers. The fishermen then may need not to pay high commission to the aratdars.
And the consumers will not have to pay what the retailers set.
Reference
10
Appendix
10. What are the problems are you facing in fish marketing?
♣ Do you get up to date market information regarding rates or demands or the like?
11