United Nations
United Nations
United Nations
Distr.: General
6 July 2012
Original: English
GE.12-61475
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
2
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
3
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
1. The thirty-sixth session of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological
Advice (SBSTA) was held at the Maritim Hotel, Bonn, Germany, from 14 to 25 May 2012.
2. The Chair of the SBSTA, Mr. Richard Muyungi (United Republic of Tanzania),
opened the session and welcomed all Parties and observers. He also welcomed Mr. Collin
Beck (Solomon Islands) as Rapporteur.
3. At its 1st meeting, on 14 May, the SBSTA considered a note by the Executive
Secretary containing the provisional agenda and annotations (FCCC/SBSTA/2012/1).
4. At the same meeting, the SBSTA adopted the agenda contained in document
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/1, with an amendment to the title of item 10(b) as follows:
1. Opening of the session.
2. Organizational matters:
(a) Adoption of the agenda;
(b) Organization of the work of the session;
(c) Election of officers other than the Chair;
(d) Election of replacement officers.
3. Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate
change.
4. Methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing emissions from
deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable
management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in
developing countries.
5. Development and transfer of technologies and report of the Technology
Executive Committee.
6. Research and systematic observation.
7. Forum and work programme on the impact of the implementation of
response measures.
8. Matters relating to Article 2, paragraph 3, of the Kyoto Protocol.
9. Issues relating to agriculture.
10. Methodological issues under the Convention:
(a) Work programme on a common reporting format for the “UNFCCC
biennial reporting guidelines for developed country Parties”;
4
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
(b) Work programme on the revision of the guidelines for the review of
biennial reports and national communications, including national
inventory reviews for developed country Parties;
(c) General guidelines for domestic measurement, reporting and
verification of domestically supported nationally appropriate
mitigation actions by developing country Parties;
(d) Emissions from fuel used for international aviation and maritime
transport;
(e) Common metrics to calculate the carbon dioxide equivalence of
greenhouse gases;
(f) Greenhouse gas data interface.
11. Methodological issues under the Kyoto Protocol:
(a) Carbon dioxide capture and storage in geological formations as clean
development mechanism project activities;
(b) Implications of the inclusion of reforestation of lands with forest in
exhaustion as afforestation and reforestation clean development
mechanism project activities;
(c) Land use, land-use change and forestry under Article 3, paragraphs 3
and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol and under the clean development
mechanism;
(d) Implications of the implementation of decisions 2/CMP.7 to 5/CMP.7
on the previous decisions on methodological issues related to the
Kyoto Protocol, including those relating to Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the
Kyoto Protocol.
12. Scientific, technical and socio-economic aspects of mitigation of climate
change.
13. Cooperation with other international organizations.
14. Other matters.
15. Report on the session.
5. Also at the 1st meeting, statements were made by representatives of 10 Parties,
including one speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, one on behalf of the
Umbrella Group, one on behalf of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), one on
behalf of the African States, one on behalf of the Environmental Integrity Group, one on
behalf of the European Union and its member States, one on behalf of the least developed
countries (LDCs) and one on behalf of the Coalition for Rainforest Nations. Statements
were also made on behalf of environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and
the constituency of farmers.
6. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st meeting, at which the Chair drew
attention to the proposed programme of work posted on the UNFCCC website. On a
proposal by the Chair, the SBSTA agreed to proceed on the basis of that programme of
work.
5
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
7. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st meeting and at its 3rd meeting, held on
25 May.
8. At the 3rd meeting, the Chair informed Parties that agreement had been reached
among regional groups on the nomination for the Vice-Chair and the Rapporteur of the
SBSTA, and the Chair proposed the nominees for election. The SBSTA elected Mr. Narcis
Paulin Jeler (Romania), representing the Eastern European States, as its Vice-Chair. Mr.
Jeler will serve for a term of one year. The SBSTA re-elected Mr. Collin Beck (Solomon
Islands), representing the small island developing States, as its Rapporteur. Mr. Beck will
serve for a second term of one year.
9. The elected Vice-Chair and Rapporteur represent Parties to both the Convention and
its Kyoto Protocol. Consequently, no election of replacement officers was held.
1. Proceedings
10. The SBSTA considered this item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. It had before it
document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/INF.1. Statements were made by representatives of two
Parties, including one speaking on behalf of the European Union and its member States.
11. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed that the Chair would consult with Parties on
this issue and present draft conclusions to the SBSTA at its 3rd meeting. At its 3rd meeting,
the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions1 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
12. The SBSTA welcomed the report on the progress made in the implementation of the
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change since
its thirty-fifth session.2
13. The SBSTA took note of the work being carried out by the secretariat, under the
guidance of the Chair of the SBSTA, inter alia on further enhancing the outreach of the
Nairobi work programme and encouraged the secretariat to continue its efforts. The SBSTA
also noted the engagement and contribution provided by Nairobi work programme partner
organizations.3
14. The SBSTA recalled decision 6/CP.17, whereby the Conference of the Parties
(COP) requested the SBSTA to reconsider, at its thirty-eighth session, the work areas of the
Nairobi work programme with a view to making recommendations to the COP at its
nineteenth session on how best to support the objectives of the Nairobi work programme.
1
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.4.
2
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/INF.1.
3
There were 251 Nairobi work programme partner organizations as at 22 May 2012.
6
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
This process would further inform the organization of potential future areas of work that
could also support the scientific and technical work under the Cancun Adaptation
Framework, as appropriate.4
15. The SBSTA also recalled decision 6/CP.17, whereby the COP invited Parties and
relevant organizations to submit to the secretariat, by 17 September 2012, their views on
potential future areas of work of the Nairobi work programme.5
1. Proceedings
16. The SBSTA considered this item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. It had before it
documents FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.1 and Add.1 and FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.9.
Statements were made by representatives of three Parties, including one on behalf of the
Congo Basin countries.6
17. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this item in a contact group, co-
chaired by Mr. Peter Graham (Canada) and Ms. Victoria Tauli-Corpuz (Philippines). At the
3rd meeting, Ms. Tauli-Corpuz reported on the contact group’s consultations. Also at its 3rd
meeting, the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions7 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
18. The SBSTA took note of decisions 2/CP.13, 4/CP.15, 1/CP.16, 2/CP.17 and
12/CP.17 in its consideration of methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing
emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation,
sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing
countries.
19. The SBSTA took note of the views submitted by Parties8 on issues identified in
decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 72 and appendix II, in particular to address drivers of
deforestation and forest degradation and on robust and transparent national forest
monitoring systems as referred to in paragraph 71(c) of the same decision. It also took note
of the views submitted by admitted observer organizations.9
20. The SBSTA continued its consideration of methodological guidance relating to
modalities for a national forest monitoring system as referred to in decision 1/CP.16,
paragraph 71(c), and for measuring, reporting and verifying as referred to in decision
1/CP.16, appendix II, paragraph (c), using the draft text contained in annex I to document
FCCC/SBSTA/2011/5 as a basis and taking into account the issues identified in decision
4
Decision 6/CP.17, paragraph 1.
5
Decision 6/CP.17, paragraph 2.
6
Burundi, the Central African Republic, Cameroon, Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo,
Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, the Congo, Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe.
7
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.9/Rev.1.
8
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.1 and Add.1.
9
Submissions from intergovernmental organizations are available at <http://unfccc.int/3714>.
Submissions from non-governmental organizations are available at <http://unfccc.int/3689>.
7
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
1/CP.16, appendix II, and the views submitted by Parties as referred to in paragraph 19
above.
21. The SBSTA agreed to continue its work on methodological guidance relating to
modalities for a national forest monitoring system as referred to in decision 1/CP.16,
paragraph 71(c), and for measuring, reporting and verifying, as referred to in decision
1/CP.16, appendix II, paragraph (c), on the basis of annex I, which contains elements for a
possible draft decision on these matters, with the aim of completing this work at its thirty-
seventh session and preparing any recommendations for a draft decision on these matters
for consideration and adoption by the COP at its eighteenth session.
22. The SBSTA initiated consideration of issues relating to drivers of deforestation and
forest degradation, taking into account decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 72 and appendix II,
paragraph (a), and the views of Parties and admitted observer organizations referred to in
paragraph 19 above. It agreed to continue its work on the issues identified in decision
1/CP.16, paragraph 72 and appendix II, in particular on how to address drivers of
deforestation and forest degradation, including consideration of social and economic
aspects in developing countries at the national level, at its thirty-seventh session.
23. The SBSTA noted the request by the COP in decision 12/CP.17, paragraphs 5 and 6,
to consider the timing and the frequency of the presentations of the summary of information
on how all of the safeguards referred to in decision 1/CP.16, appendix I, are being
addressed and respected and to consider the need for further guidance to ensure
transparency, consistency, comprehensiveness and effectiveness in the presentation of the
summary of information. It agreed to continue consideration of this request at its thirty-
seventh session with a view to concluding its consideration of this matter at its thirty-ninth
session.
24. The SBSTA, in recalling decision 12/CP.17, paragraph 15, agreed to initiate work
on developing guidance for the technical assessment of the proposed forest reference
emission levels and/or forest reference levels at its thirty-seventh session, with the aim of
reporting to the COP at its eighteenth and nineteenth sessions on progress made, including
any recommendations for a draft decision on this matter.
25. The SBSTA recognized that further work on methodological guidance may be
needed pending the outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term
Cooperative Action under the Convention.
26. The SBSTA recognized that Parties aiming to undertake the activities referred to in
decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 70, could consider the adaptation needs of the country
concerned.
1. Proceedings
27. The SBSTA considered this item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. It had before it
document FCCC/SB/2012/1.
28. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this item together with Subsidiary
Body for Implementation (SBI) agenda item 12(a) in a joint contact group, co-chaired by
Mr. Carlos Fuller (Belize) and Mr. Zitouni Ould-Dada (United Kingdom of Great Britain
8
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
and Northern Ireland). At the 3rd meeting, Mr. Fuller reported on these consultations. Also
at its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions10 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
29. The SBSTA and the SBI welcomed the report on the linkage modalities and the
rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee (TEC) for 2012–2013.11
30. The SBSTA and the SBI also welcomed the rolling workplan of the TEC for
2012–2013, as set out in annex I to the report referred to in paragraph 29 above, and
encouraged the TEC to advance the implementation of this workplan. The SBSTA and the
SBI encouraged the TEC to undertake the short-term activities of this plan as a matter of
priority and welcomed the organization of thematic dialogues, including one on enabling
environments and barriers to technology development and transfer, at its next meeting.
31. The SBSTA and the SBI noted that the TEC has structured its workplan around the
following three areas in order to prioritize its work: activities mandated by the United
Nations Climate Change Conference held in Durban, South Africa, in 2011; short-term
activities to begin in 2012; and medium-term activities to begin in 2013.
32. The SBSTA and the SBI also noted the initial ideas of the TEC on its modalities on
linkages with other relevant institutional arrangements under and outside the Convention,
as referred to in decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 125, and developed by the TEC in response to
decision 4/CP.17. The SBSTA and the SBI further noted that the nature of such linkages
may evolve over time, recognizing that a number of institutional arrangements are
materializing pursuant to decisions taken at the seventeenth session of the COP and that
some institutional arrangements have been asked to collaborate with the TEC, as referred to
in decision 3/CP.17, paragraph 17, and that some institutional arrangements have been
asked to develop mechanisms to draw upon appropriate expert and technical advice,
including from the relevant thematic bodies established under the Convention, as
appropriate.
33. The SBSTA and the SBI invited the TEC to further elaborate and fine-tune its initial
ideas on modalities on linkages with the institutional arrangements under and outside the
Convention as set out in annex II of the report referred to in paragraph 29 above.
34. The SBSTA and the SBI noted that the TEC will consult with the relevant
institutional arrangements, once they become operational, to seek their views and mutual
agreement on the proposed linkage modalities. The SBSTA and the SBI also noted that the
TEC will report on the results of its consultations with these relevant institutional
arrangements on these modalities in its report on activities and performance for 2012,
through the subsidiary bodies, for consideration by the COP at its eighteenth session.
35. The SBSTA recalled the conclusions12 of its thirty-fifth session requesting the
secretariat, in collaboration with interested organizations, to organize workshops, subject to
the availability of resources, on technology needs assessments (TNAs) in 2012 and noted
that the United Nations Environment Programme, in collaboration with the secretariat,
plans to organize a workshop on TNAs in the second half of 2012. The SBSTA requested
the secretariat to report on the outcomes of this workshop and to make the report available
to the SBSTA for consideration at its thirty-seventh session.
10
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.12.
11
FCCC/SB/2012/1.
12
FCCC/SBSTA/2011/5, paragraph 31.
9
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
1. Proceedings
36. The SBSTA considered this item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. It had before it
documents FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.2 and Add.1 and 2, FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.3
and FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.4. Statements were made by representatives of the World
Meteorological Organization (WMO), the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) and
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
37. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this item in informal consultations,
co-facilitated by Mr. Stefan Roesner (Germany) and Mr. David Lesolle (Botswana). In
addition, a research dialogue was held on 19 May.13 At the 3rd meeting, Mr. Lesolle
reported on these consultations. Also at its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA considered and adopted
conclusions14 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
38. The SBSTA took note of the views of Parties and of the progress made in
developing draft conclusions under this agenda item.
39. The SBSTA agreed to continue its consideration of this agenda item at its thirty-
seventh session on the basis of the draft text contained in annex II.
1. Proceedings
40. The SBSTA considered this item at its 1st and 3rd meetings.
41. At its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this item jointly with agenda item
11 of the SBI in a joint SBI/SBSTA forum co-chaired by the Chair of the SBSTA, Mr.
Muyungi, and the Chair of the SBI, Mr. Tomasz Chruszczow (Poland). It also agreed to
consider, at this session, this item jointly with agenda item 8.
42. At the 3rd meeting, Mr. Muyungi reported on the forum. Also at its 3rd meeting, the
SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions15 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
43. The SBSTA and the SBI welcomed the discussion at the first meeting of the forum
on the impact of the implementation of response measures, and the work on the modalities
for the operationalization of the work programme, in accordance with decision 8/CP.17.
44. The SBSTA and the SBI agreed to implement the work programme on the impact of
the implementation of response measures as contained in annex III, under the guidance of
the Chairs of the SBSTA and the SBI.
45. The SBSTA and the SBI requested the secretariat to support, under the guidance of
the Chairs of the SBSTA and the SBI, the implementation of the work programme.
13
For further information on the SBSTA 36 research dialogue, see <http://unfccc.int/6896.php>.
14
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.17.
15
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.18–FCCC/SBI/2012/L.25.
10
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
46. The SBSTA and the SBI invited relevant organizations and other stakeholders to
participate in the activities of the work programme contained in annex III.
Proceedings
47. The SBSTA considered this item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. A statement was made
by a representative of one Party.
48. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider, at this session, this item jointly
with agenda item 7 and agenda item 11 of the SBI in a joint SBI/SBSTA forum.
49. At the same meeting, the SBSTA also agreed that the SBSTA Chair, Mr. Muyungi,
and the SBI Chair, Mr. Chruszczow, would undertake consultations with interested Parties
on how to take up this item at the next session.
50. At the 3rd meeting, Mr. Muyungi reported on the forum and the SBSTA considered
and adopted the conclusions presented in paragraphs 43–46 above. At the same meeting,
the SBSTA agreed to continue, at its thirty-seventh session, consultations on how to take up
this item.
1. Proceedings
51. The SBSTA considered this item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. It had before it
document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.6 and Add.1–3. Statements were made by
representatives of two Parties, including one on behalf of the LDCs.
52. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this item in a contact group,
chaired by the Chair of the SBSTA. At the 3rd meeting, the SBSTA Chair reported on the
contact group’s consultations. Also at its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA considered and adopted
conclusions16 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
53. The SBSTA initiated, in accordance with decision 2/CP.17, paragraph 75, an
exchange of views on issues relating to agriculture and agreed to continue consideration of
this agenda item at its thirty-seventh session.
16
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.19.
11
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
1. Proceedings
54. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st and 3rd meetings.
55. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this sub-item in a contact group,
co-chaired by Ms. Helen Plume (New Zealand) and Mr. Qiang Liu (China). At the 3rd
meeting, Ms. Plume reported on the contact group’s consultations. Also at its 3rd meeting,
the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions17 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
56. The SBSTA initiated its consideration of the work programme on a common tabular
format for electronic reporting of information (hereinafter referred to as the common
tabular format) in accordance with the “UNFCCC biennial reporting guidelines for
developed country Parties” as contained in annex I to decision 2/CP.17 (hereinafter referred
to as the reporting guidelines) with a view to the COP, at its eighteenth session, adopting
the format.
57. The SBSTA also acknowledged that, in accordance with decision 2/CP.17,
developed country Parties shall use the reporting guidelines for the preparation of the first
biennial reports, taking into account their national circumstances, and shall submit their
first biennial reports to the secretariat by 1 January 2014.
58. The SBSTA agreed that the common tabular format will include tables for
information specified in paragraphs 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 22 and 23 of the reporting
guidelines. It may also include tables for information specified in paragraphs, inter alia, 13,
19 and 24 of the reporting guidelines.
59. The SBSTA also agreed that the work programme on a common tabular format
mandated by decision 2/CP.17 should include the submission of views from Parties, which
would be compiled into a miscellaneous document, the preparation of a synthesis report of
these submissions and the organization of a workshop and the preparation of a workshop
report.
60. The SBSTA invited Parties to submit, based on the reporting guidelines, their views,
by 13 August 2012, on the common tabular format mentioned in paragraph 58 above.
61. The SBSTA requested the secretariat to compile the submissions from Parties into a
miscellaneous document and to prepare a synthesis report of Parties’ submissions as an
input to the workshop mentioned in paragraph 62 below.
62. The SBSTA requested the secretariat to organize a workshop on a common tabular
format in October 2012 and to prepare a workshop report, for consideration by the SBSTA
at its thirty-seventh session.
63. The SBSTA agreed to continue, at its thirty-seventh session, its consideration of a
common tabular format, taking into account the views submitted by Parties referred to in
17
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.11.
12
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
paragraph 60 above, the synthesis of these views referred to in paragraph 61 above and the
workshop report referred to in paragraph 62 above.
64. The SBSTA took note of the estimated budgetary implications, as provided by the
secretariat, to implement the actions requested in paragraphs 61 and 62 above.
65. The SBSTA requested that the actions of the secretariat called for in these
conclusions be undertaken subject to the availability of financial resources.
1. Proceedings
66. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st and 3rd meetings.
67. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this sub-item in a contact group,
co-chaired by Ms. Plume and Mr. Qiang Liu. At the 3rd meeting, Ms. Plume reported on the
contact group’s consultations. Also at its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA considered and adopted
conclusions18 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
68. The SBSTA initiated its consideration of the work programme on the revision of the
guidelines for the review of biennial reports and national communications, including
national inventory reviews, for developed country Parties (hereinafter referred to as the
review guidelines), with a view to completing this work by the nineteenth session of the
COP.
69. The SBSTA acknowledged that in accordance with decision 2/CP.17, biennial
reports from developed country Parties are due on 1 January 2014 and that the first round of
international assessment and review should commence two months after the submission of
the first round of biennial reports.
70. The SBSTA also acknowledged that Parties included in Annex I to the Convention
(Annex I Parties) are requested to submit their sixth national communications by 1 January
2014, and to submit their annual national inventories using the revised “Guidelines for the
preparation of national communications by Parties included in Annex I to the Convention,
Part I: UNFCCC reporting guidelines on annual inventories”19 in their 2015 annual
submissions.
71. The SBSTA agreed that in revising the review guidelines, Parties should take into
account experience with the reporting and review of information under the Convention and
the need to have a cost-effective, efficient and practical review process that does not impose
an excessive burden on Parties or the secretariat.
72. The SBSTA requested the secretariat to prepare a technical paper summarizing the
current review processes under the Convention and the secretariat’s experience with
coordinating reviews of national communications and annual greenhouse gas (GHG)
inventories of Annex I Parties for consideration by the SBSTA at its thirty-seventh session.
18
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.13.
19
FCCC/SBSTA/2006/9.
13
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
73. The SBSTA invited Parties to submit their views, by 15 September 2012, on the
elements of the work programme referred to in paragraph 68 above and on the timeline of
proposed activities, as well as on the key elements of the revision of the review guidelines
for the review of biennial reports from developed country Parties and national
communications, including national GHG inventories, from Annex I Parties, taking into
consideration experience from current review practices.
74. The SBSTA requested the secretariat to prepare a synthesis paper of Parties’
submissions as an input to the discussion by the SBSTA at its thirty-seventh session.
75. The SBSTA agreed, given the need to complete the work by the COP at its
nineteenth session, to further consider, at its thirty-seventh session, the work programme on
the revision of review guidelines, including the organization of technical workshops.
76. The SBSTA took note of the estimated budgetary implications, as provided by the
secretariat, to implement the actions requested in paragraphs 72 and 74 above.
77. The SBSTA requested that the actions of the secretariat called for in these
conclusions be undertaken subject to the availability of financial resources.
1. Proceedings
78. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st and 3rd meetings.
79. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this sub-item in a contact group,
co-chaired by Ms. Plume and Mr. Qiang Liu. At the 3rd meeting, Mr. Qiang Liu reported on
the contact group’s consultations. Also at its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA considered and
adopted conclusions20 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
80. The SBSTA, in accordance with decision 2/CP.17, paragraph 37, initiated its
consideration of the development of general guidelines for domestic measurement,
reporting and verification of domestically supported nationally appropriate mitigation
actions by developing country Parties (hereinafter referred to as the guidelines).
81. The SBSTA agreed to continue the interactive exchange of views on the guidelines
with a view to agreeing on the next steps at its thirty-seventh session.
1. Proceedings
82. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 2nd meeting, held on 14 May, and at its
rd
3 meeting. It had before it document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.7. Statements were made
by representatives of 10 Parties, including one speaking on behalf of the African States and
20
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.15.
14
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
one on behalf of the European Union and its member States. A statement was also made by
a representative of the International Maritime Organization (IMO).
83. At its 2nd meeting, the SBSTA agreed that the Chair would consult with Parties on
this issue and present draft conclusions to the SBSTA at its 3rd meeting. At its 3rd meeting,
the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions21 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
84. The SBSTA took note of the information received from and progress reported by the
secretariats of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and IMO on their
ongoing work on addressing emissions from fuel used for international aviation and
maritime transport,22 and noted the views expressed by Parties on this information.
85. The SBSTA invited the secretariats of ICAO and IMO to continue to report, at
future sessions of the SBSTA, on relevant work on this issue.
1. Proceedings
86. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. It had before it
document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/INF.2. A statement was made by a representative of one
Party.
87. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this sub-item in informal
consultations, facilitated by Mr. Michael Gytarsky (Russian Federation). At the 3rd meeting,
Mr. Gytarsky reported on these consultations. Also at its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA
considered and adopted conclusions23 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
88. The SBSTA continued its consideration of the common metrics used to calculate the
carbon dioxide equivalence of anthropogenic GHG emissions by sources and removals by
sinks (hereinafter referred to as common metrics) under the methodological issues under
the Convention.
89. The SBSTA welcomed the report24 on the workshop on common metrics, which
focused on uncertainties, new and refined areas or metrics, policy goals, and the
relationship between policy frameworks and metrics, held in Bonn on 3 and 4 April 2012,
which was organized by the secretariat following a request made by the SBSTA at its
thirty-fourth session.25
90. The SBSTA acknowledged the relevance of the workshop and its report. The
SBSTA expressed its appreciation to the representatives of IPCC working group I (WG I)
and IPCC working group III (WG III) for providing information on the status of the work
of these groups on common metrics and to the members of the scientific community that
provided updated and relevant information on the scientific knowledge on common metrics.
21
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.14.
22
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.7.
23
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.5.
24
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/INF.2.
25
FCCC/SBSTA/2011/2, paragraph 101.
15
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
91. The SBSTA noted that common metrics are being assessed by the IPCC in the
context of its work on the Fifth Assessment Report and acknowledged the relevance of
common metrics to climate change policy.
92. The SBSTA invited the IPCC to present its findings on common metrics from its
Fifth Assessment Report at the fortieth session of the SBSTA. The SBSTA requested the
secretariat to organize a special event for this purpose.
93. The SBSTA agreed to continue, at its fortieth session, its consideration of this
agenda item.
94. The SBSTA requested that the actions of the secretariat called for in these
conclusions be undertaken subject to the availability of financial resources.
1. Proceedings
95. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st and 3rd meetings.
96. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed that the Chair would consult with Parties on
this issue and present draft conclusions to the SBSTA at its 3rd meeting. At its 3rd meeting,
the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions26 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
97. The SBSTA welcomed the further improvements made by the secretariat to the
GHG data interface, in particular the provision of the facility to calculate user-defined
indicators, as well as the inclusion of information from the compilation and accounting
database.
98. The SBSTA noted with concern that, due to a lack of resources, the secretariat has
not yet implemented the request made by the SBSTA at its thirty-fourth session27 to present
data in the modules of the data interface, where applicable, in physical units in addition to
carbon dioxide equivalent, and reiterated its request.
99. The SBSTA agreed to consider, at its thirty-eighth session, matters relating to the
further development of the interface in order to accommodate relevant changes relating to
the forthcoming use of the revised reporting guidelines28 by Annex I Parties in their annual
GHG inventory reporting, starting with the 2015 submission, subject to a final decision by
the COP on the revised guidelines at its nineteenth session.
100. The SBSTA requested that the actions of the secretariat called for in these
conclusions be undertaken subject to the availability of financial resources.
26
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.7.
27
FCCC/SBSTA/2011/2, paragraph 84.
28
“Guidelines for the preparation of national communications by Parties included in Annex I to the
Convention, Part I: UNFCCC reporting guidelines on annual greenhouse gas inventories” (decision
15/CP.17, annex I).
16
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
1. Proceedings
101. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. It had before it
document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.8 and Add.1 and 2.
102. At its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this sub-item in informal
consultations, co-facilitated by Mr. Peer Stiansen (Norway) and Mr. Abias Moma Huongo
(Angola). At the 3rd meeting, Mr. Stiansen reported on these consultations. Also at its 3rd
meeting, the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions29 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
103. The SBSTA took note of the views submitted by Parties30 and admitted observer
organizations, and the views expressed by Parties during its thirty-sixth session, on the
following issues referred to in decision 10/CMP.7, paragraph 4:
(a) The eligibility of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) project activities
which involve the transport of carbon dioxide from one country to another or which involve
geological storage sites that are located in more than one country;
(b) The establishment of a global reserve of certified emission reduction units for
CCS project activities, in addition to the reserve referred to in decision 10/CMP.7, annex,
paragraph 21(b).
104. The SBSTA agreed to continue its consideration of this matter at its thirty-seventh
session.
105. The SBSTA invited Parties, intergovernmental organizations and admitted observer
organizations to submit to the secretariat, by 13 August 2012, their views on the issues
referred to in paragraph 103 above and requested the secretariat to compile the submissions
into a miscellaneous document.
106. The SBSTA requested the secretariat to prepare a technical paper on the issue
referred to in paragraph 103(a) above for its consideration at its thirty-seventh session. The
paper should draw upon, inter alia, the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse
Gas Inventories, the 1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution
by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (known as the London Protocol), the IPCC
Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage, scientific research, the submissions
referred to in paragraphs 103 and 105 above and the annex to decision 10/CMP.7, and
should address issues such as the following:
(a) International law and frameworks relevant to CCS project activities which
involve the transport of carbon dioxide from one country to another or which involve
geological storage sites that are located in more than one country;
(b) Possible options for transboundary CCS project activities, and obligations
arising therefrom, including the following:
29
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.8.
30
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.8 and Add.1 and 2.
17
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
1. Proceedings
109. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 1st and 3rd meetings. It had before it
document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.10. A statement was made by a representative of one
Party.
110. At its 1st meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this sub-item in informal
consultations, facilitated by Mr. Eduardo Sanhueza (Chile). At the 3rd meeting, Mr.
Sanhueza reported on these consultations. Also at its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA considered
and adopted conclusions31 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
111. The SBSTA took note of a summary report, as contained in document
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.10.
112. The SBSTA agreed to continue consideration of this agenda item at its thirty-eighth
session.
1. Proceedings
113. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 2nd and 3rd meetings.
114. At its 2nd meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this sub-item in a contact group,
co-chaired by Mr. Peter Iversen (Denmark) and Mr. Marcelo Rocha (Brazil). At the 3rd
31
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.10.
18
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
meeting, Mr. Rocha reported on the contact group’s consultations. Also at its 3rd meeting,
the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions32 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
115. The SBSTA initiated its consideration of the issues related to land use, land-use
change and forestry (LULUCF) as referred to in decision 2/CMP.7, paragraphs 5, 6, 7 and
10, with the aim of reporting to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the
Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP), at its eighth session, on the progress made.
116. The SBSTA initiated its consideration of the issues related to modalities and
procedures for alternative approaches to addressing the risk of non-permanence under the
clean development mechanism (CDM), in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, paragraph 7,
and invited Parties and admitted observer organizations to submit to the secretariat, by 10
September 2012, their views on these issues for compilation by the secretariat into a
miscellaneous document for consideration by the SBSTA at its thirty-seventh session.
117. The SBSTA initiated its consideration of the issues related to modalities and
procedures for possible additional LULUCF activities under the CDM in accordance with
decision 2/CMP.7, paragraph 6, and invited Parties and admitted observer organizations to
submit to the secretariat, by 10 September 2012, their views on these issues for compilation
by the secretariat into a miscellaneous document for consideration by the SBSTA at its
thirty-seventh session.
118. The SBSTA initiated its consideration of the issues related to a more comprehensive
accounting of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks from LULUCF,
including through a more inclusive activity-based approach or a land-based approach, as
referred to in decision 2/CMP.7, paragraph 5, and invited Parties and admitted observer
organizations to submit to the secretariat, by 17 September 2012, their views on these
issues, for compilation by the secretariat into a miscellaneous document for consideration
by the SBSTA at its thirty-seventh session.
1. Proceedings
119. The SBSTA considered this sub-item at its 2nd and 3rd meetings.
120. At its 2nd meeting, the SBSTA agreed to consider this sub-item in a contact group,
co-chaired by Mr. Nagmeldin Elhassan (Sudan) and Ms. Anke Herold (Germany). At the
3rd meeting, Mr. Herold reported on the contact group’s consultations. Also at its 3rd
meeting, the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions33 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
121. Responding to the request from the CMP,34 the SBSTA initiated work to assess and
address the implications of the implementation of decisions 2/CMP.7 to 5/CMP.7 on the
32
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.3.
33
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.16.
34
Decision 1/CMP.7, paragraph 9.
19
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
previous decisions on methodological issues related to the Kyoto Protocol adopted by the
CMP, including those relating to Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol.
122. The SBSTA acknowledged the importance of the technical work under this agenda
sub-item for the implementation of the second commitment period under the Kyoto
Protocol. It noted that the initial assessment indicated that there is a considerable amount of
work to be done on several decisions on methodological issues under the Kyoto Protocol,
which should be addressed.
123. To facilitate further progress on this agenda sub-item in 2012, the SBSTA:
(a) Requested the secretariat to prepare a technical paper that includes a
comprehensive identification of the implications of decisions 2/CMP.7 to 5/CMP.7 on the
previous CMP decisions on methodological issues related to the Kyoto Protocol, including
those relating to Articles 5, 7 and 8, building on the presentations made by the secretariat to
the SBSTA at its thirty-sixth session and discussions by Parties at that session, and to
indicate the technical issues that are relevant to implement these decisions in the second
commitment period. The technical paper should include options to address the relevant
methodological decisions, with annotations explaining the rationale for these suggested
options and the relationship of the suggested options to decisions 2/CMP.7 to 5/CMP.7.
This would include identification of paragraphs in methodological decisions where further
guidance from Parties is needed. Where applicable, the implications identified should be
clustered into generic categories with the aim of ensuring a consistent approach across
decisions. The secretariat may also address technical issues arising from the
implementation of previous CMP decisions on methodological issues identified in the first
commitment period. The technical paper will provide the basis for discussions by
participants at the technical workshop mentioned in paragraph 123(d) below. It will also be
made available for consideration by Parties at the thirty-seventh session of the SBSTA. The
technical paper should be available by 1 September 2012;
(b) Invited Parties to submit to the secretariat, by 21 September 2012, their views
on the implications of the implementation of decisions 2/CMP.7 to 5/CMP.7 on the
previous CMP decisions on methodological issues related to the Kyoto Protocol, including
those relating to Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol, and on how these implications
should be addressed;
(c) Requested the secretariat to make these submissions available on the
UNFCCC website and to compile them into a miscellaneous document before the workshop
referred to in paragraph 123(d) below;
(d) Further requested the secretariat to organize a technical workshop, to be held
before the thirty-seventh session of the SBSTA, with the aim of facilitating progress in the
consideration of this agenda sub-item at that session to discuss the technical paper referred
to in paragraph 123(a) above and to consider Parties’ views referred to in paragraph 123(b)
above. It requested the secretariat to prepare a report on the workshop before the thirty-
seventh session of the SBSTA.
124. The SBSTA agreed to continue, at its thirty-seventh session, consideration on this
agenda sub-item, taking into account the technical paper referred to in paragraph 123(a)
above, the submissions from Parties referred to in paragraph 123(b) above and the report
from the workshop referred to in paragraph 123(d) above, with a view to preparing draft
decisions for consideration and adoption by the CMP at its eighth session. It also agreed, if
appropriate, to develop further elements of this agenda sub-item to be implemented in
2013, with a view to preparing further draft decisions for consideration and adoption by the
CMP at its ninth session.
20
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
125. The SBSTA noted with appreciation the IPCC scoping meeting held in Geneva,
Switzerland, on 1–4 May 2012 in response to the invitation in decision 2/CMP.7 on the
work of the IPCC to review and, if necessary, update supplementary methodologies for
estimating anthropogenic GHG emissions by sources and removals by sinks resulting from
LULUCF activities under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol, on the basis
of, inter alia, chapter 4 of its Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-use Change and
Forestry.
126. The SBSTA considered the timeline in decision 2/CMP.7 for completion of the
work of the IPCC referred to in paragraph 125 above and its subsequent consideration by
the SBSTA with a view to forwarding a decision on the matter to the CMP at its tenth
session. It noted with concern that this timeline would not allow for the methodological
guidance to be adopted in time for the inventory submissions by 15 April 2015, the due
date for the inventory submissions for the first year under the second commitment period.
Therefore, the SBSTA invited the IPCC to consider the possibility of completing the work
on the methodological guidance within a revised time frame, by October 2013, to allow for
adoption of a decision on this matter by the CMP at its ninth session
127. The SBSTA requested that the actions of the secretariat called for in paragraph
123(d) above be undertaken subject to the availability of financial resources.
1. Proceedings
128. The SBSTA considered this item at its 2nd and 3rd meetings.
129. At its 2nd meeting, the SBSTA agreed that the Chair would prepare draft conclusions
and present them to the SBSTA at its 3rd meeting. At its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA considered
and adopted conclusions35 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
130. The SBSTA agreed to continue its consideration of the scientific, technical and
socio-economic aspects of mitigation at its thirty-eighth session, taking into account the
best available scientific information on mitigation, in particular information from the IPCC,
and the ongoing work of other bodies under the Convention on related matters.
1. Proceedings
131. The SBSTA considered this item at its 2nd and 3rd meetings. It had before it
document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/INF.3. Statements were made by representatives of the
IPCC, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations Convention
to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).
35
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.2.
21
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
132. At its 2nd meeting, the SBSTA agreed that the Chair would consult with Parties on
this issue and present draft conclusions to the SBSTA at its 3rd meeting. At its 3rd meeting,
the SBSTA considered and adopted conclusions36 proposed by the Chair.
2. Conclusions
133. The SBSTA noted with appreciation the information paper37 prepared by the
secretariat on relevant activities in which the secretariat has been involved with other
intergovernmental organizations and noted the information provided in it.
134. The SBSTA took note of the statements made by representatives of the IPCC and
the secretariats of CBD and UNCCD on their activities and efforts to advance the
implementation of actions to address climate change in their respective areas of expertise,
responding to the needs of, and decisions taken by, Parties, and taking into account
potential linkages and synergies.
135. The SBSTA reaffirmed the importance of the secretariat engaging with other
intergovernmental organizations, in particular United Nations entities, and with other
international organizations as appropriate, to focus on actions that support the effective
implementation of the Convention.
136. The SBSTA recognized the resources and expertise that other intergovernmental and
international organizations have and that are relevant to the UNFCCC process and
encouraged the secretariat to seek support, where appropriate, from relevant international
organizations and to work in partnership with these towards the effective implementation of
the Convention.
138. At its 3rd meeting, the SBSTA considered and adopted the draft report on its thirty-
sixth session.38 At the same meeting, on a proposal by the Chair, the SBSTA authorized the
Rapporteur to complete the report on the session, with the assistance of the secretariat and
under the guidance of the Chair.
36
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.6.
37
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/INF.3.
38
Adopted as document FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.1.
22
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
39
While decision 16/CP.9 refers to “decisions”, it also has implications for conclusions of the subsidiary
bodies.
23
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
Annex I
[English only]
1
Complete here means the provision of data and information that allows the technical analysis of the
results[, and the establishment of forest reference emission levels and/or forest reference levels].
24
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
6. [Decides that under the joint mitigation and adaptation approach for the integral and
sustainable management of forests a comprehensive and holistic monitoring system shall be
developed considering the multiple functions of forests in climate change;]]
2
[footnote to be elaborated]
3
[placeholder for a footnote]
25
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
26
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
submitted for consideration and possible adoption by the Conference of the Parties at a
future session;]
14. [Requests the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice to continue
its consideration of modalities for [measuring, ]reporting and [verification of results-based
actions [which preserve and enhance the multiple benefits of forests including adaptation,
poverty alleviation, biodiversity and secure livelihoods]] [verifying anthropogenic forest-
related emissions by sources and removals by sinks, forest carbon stocks, and forest carbon
stock and forest-area changes resulting from the implementation of the activities] referred
to in decision 1/CP.16, paragraph [70] [73] [taking into account paragraph 71(b)], with the
aim of completing its work on this matter at its [thirty-seventh] [thirty-ninth] session and
reporting to the Conference of the Parties at its [eighteenth][nineteenth] session on progress
made, including any recommendation for a draft decision on this matter; ]
15. [Also encourages Parties to develop a system for measuring, reporting and verifying
under the joint mitigation and adaptation approach for the integral and sustainable
management of forests.] ]
27
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
Annex II
[English only]
1. [The Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) noted with
appreciation the statements delivered by representatives of the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO), the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) and the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
2. The SBSTA welcomed the plan of the GCOS Steering Committee and secretariat to
prepare, in broad consultation with relevant partners, by early 2015, a third report on the
adequacy of the global observing systems for climate1 and, by 2016, a new implementation
plan for the global observing system for climate, which would, inter alia, support the
Convention.2 The SBSTA invited the GCOS secretariat to provide the final implementation
plan to the SBSTA in 2016 by its [45th] session, and the third adequacy report to the
SBSTA by 2015 at its [43rd] session. The SBSTA encouraged the GCOS to provide a draft
of the implementation plan to the SBSTA by its [43rd] session in 2015.
3. [The SBSTA noted that the GCOS secretariat would consider, inter alia, [emerging
observational needs for adaptation and for the provision of climate services, and] the
findings of the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC, in the development of the third
adequacy report.]
4. The SBSTA welcomed the activities undertaken by the GCOS secretariat to support
efforts to address the needs for climate observations, including the preparation of an update
of the Satellite Supplement3 to the 2010 updated GCOS implementation plan. The SBSTA
invited the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) to respond to this new
supplement when reporting to the thirty-seventh session of the SBSTA on progress made.4
5. The SBSTA further welcomed the regional initiatives of the GCOS secretariat5 in
supporting the development of and improvements to climate observation capacities. The
SBSTA invited the GCOS secretariat to further expand such initiatives6 and encouraged
Parties, in a position to do so, to support these efforts.
1
A report on the adequacy of the climate observing systems was prepared in 1998, followed by a
second such report in 2003, both of which are available at
<http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/index.php?name=Publications>.
2
For the summary of the GCOS Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in
Support of the UNFCCC, prepared in 2004, see document FCCC/SBSTA/2004/MISC.16. For the
summary of the 2010 update of the plan see document FCCC/SBSTA/2010/MISC.9.
3
Full title of the Satellite Supplement: Systematic Observation Requirements for Satellite-based
Products for Climate. This report provides supplemental details to the satellite-based component of
the 2010 update of the GCOS implementation plan. The full report is available at
<http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/Publications/gcos-154.pdf>.
4
At its thirty-third session, the SBSTA invited CEOS to provide, by the thirty-seventh session of the
SBSTA, an updated report on progress made on major achievements in relevant areas
(FCCC/SBSTA/2010/13, para. 53).
5
Recent regional initiatives of the GCOS secretariat have focused on Africa and South America, as
indicated by the GCOS secretariat in its submission to the SBSTA (see FCCC/SBSTA/2012/MISC.4).
6
For example, to the Asia-Pacific region and the Caribbean.
28
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
6. The SBSTA noted that the report on progress by the Global Terrestrial Observing
System (GTOS) secretariat was not submitted to the SBSTA by its thirty-sixth session,7 and
encouraged the GTOS secretariat to submit that report to the SBSTA by its xxth session.
The SBSTA highlighted the importance of such reports for the work of the SBSTA.
7. The SBSTA expressed its appreciation to the GCOS sponsors8 for the support
provided to the GCOS programme for the past 20 years, and encouraged them to continue
to provide such support. The SBSTA also welcomed the initiative by the GCOS sponsors to
undertake a review of GCOS, and invited the GCOS sponsors, through WMO, to inform
the SBSTA on the outcome of this review.
8. The SBSTA noted with appreciation the information by WMO on progress made
towards implementation of the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS), including
on the draft GFCS Implementation Plan. The SBSTA invited WMO to keep the SBSTA
informed on the developments of the GFCS.
9. The SBSTA noted the importance of systematic observation for vulnerability
assessments and adaptation, with specific emphasis on developing countries. The SBSTA
encouraged Parties to contribute to the identification of emerging needs for systematic
observation in the context of the Convention, in support of the activities mentioned in
paragraph 2 above.
10. [The SBSTA noted the potential of systematic observation for carbon monitoring,
such as for monitoring carbon fluxes in ecosystems[, and invited GCOS to consider
enhancing its activities in this regard.]]
11. [The SBSTA agreed to continue its consideration of systematic observation at its
thirty-seventh session, and then revert to its customary practice of focusing on research
during the first sessional period of a year and on systematic observation during the second
sessional period of a year.]
12. [The SBSTA welcomed the continuation of the research dialogue held during the
thirty-sixth session of the SBSTA. It also conveyed its appreciation to the regional and
international programs and organizations [footnote on participants] engaged in climate
change research, the IPCC and scientific experts for their active participations and
contribution to the research dialogue. The SBSTA also expressed its appreciation to Parties
for sharing their views on their research needs and priorities.]
13. [SBSTA agreed to focus the next Research Dialogue at SBSTA 38. The SBSTA
invited Parties to provide, by 31 January 2013, their views on the research dialogue,
including on-going activities, associated modalities and ways to enhance the dialogue. The
SBSTA requested the secretariat to compile these submissions to a miscellaneous document
for consideration by the SBSTA at its 38th session.]
14. [SBSTA agreed to focus the next research dialogue at SBSTA 38th session on socio-
economic and scientific aspects of climate change. SBSTA invited Parties to submit their
views on this theme by [date] with the view to organize a workshop before SBSTA 38 to
allow in-depth consideration of this theme.]]
7
At its thirty-third session, the SBSTA invited the secretariat of the GTOS to report to the SBSTA at
its thirty-fifth session on progress made on a number of matters relating to climate-related terrestrial
observations (see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/13, paras. 47–50). At the thirty-fifth session of the SBSTA, the
GTOS secretariat provided a summary of progress (FCCC/SBSTA/2011/MISC. 14), indicating that
the report invited by the SBSTA at its thirty-third session would be submitted to the SBSTA at its
thirty-sixth session.
8
The sponsors of GCOS are the following: WMO, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission
of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, the United Nations
Environment Programme and the International Council for Science.
29
30
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
Annex III
Forum and work programme on the impact of the implementation of response measures
2012 2013
a
Before/during SBs 37 Before/during SBsa 38 Before/during SBsa 39
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
31
32
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
2012 2013
Note: The submissions may include experiences, case studies, best practices and views.
a
The Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice and the Subsidiary Body for Implementation.
b
This refers to areas in accordance with decision 8/CP.17, paragraph 1.
c
Discussions at the forum will be held in a workshop-like format with presentations from Parties and relevant organizations, followed by interactive exchange of views.
d
In order to facilitate the preparation of the miscellaneous documents, Parties may provide their views in separate submissions or in a single submission consisting of
distinct sections addressing areas (a), (f) and (h) of the work programme in accordance with decision 8/CP.17, paragraph 1. The deadline for submission is 17 September 2012.
e
In order to facilitate the preparation of the miscellaneous documents, Parties may provide their views in separate submissions or in a single submission consisting of
distinct sections addressing areas (c), (d), (e), and (g) of the work programme in accordance with decision 8/CP.17, paragraph 1. The deadline for submission is 25 March 2013.
f
Parties may provide their views only addressing area (b) of the work programme in accordance with decision 8/CP.17, paragraph 1. The deadline for submission is 2
September 2013.
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
Annex IV
33
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
34
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
35
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2
36