We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 502
Sag, (45. b PE
Stephen Gasiorowicz
University of Minnesota
a8 EN.
wisTiTuu, BE Pz
38 Betty “ |
pi Ste
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
new york - london + sydney + torontopreface
This book is intended to setve as an introduction co quantum physics.
In writing it, I have kept several guidelines in mind
1. First, it is helpful for the development of intuition in any new field of
study to start with a base of detailed knowledge about simple systems. I have
therefore worked out a number of problems in great detail, so thar the insight
thus obrained can be used for more complex systems.
2. Every aspect of quantum mechanics has been helpful in understanding
some physical phenomenon. I have therefore laid great stress on applications at
every stage of the development of the subject. Although no atea of quantum
physics is totally developed, my intention is to bridge the gap. between a
modern physics course and the more formal development of quantum mechanics.
Thus, many applications are discussed, and I have stressed order-of-magnitude
estimates and the importance of numbers.
3. In keeping with the level of the book, the mathematical structure has
been kept as simple as possible. New concepts, such as operators, and new
mathematical cools necessarily make their appearance. I have dealt with the
former mote by analogy than by precise definition, and I have minimized the
use of new tools insofar as possible.
In approaching quantum theory, I chose to start with wave mechanics and
the Schrédinger equation. Although the state-vector approach gets at the
essential structure of quantum mechanics more rapidly, experience has shown
that the use of more familiar tools, such as differential equations, makes the
theory more accessible and the correspondence with classical physics more
transparent.
The book probably contains a little more material than can comfortably be
covered in one year. The basic material can be covered in one academic quarter.
vilviii Preface
Ik consists of Chapters 1 to G, 8, and 9, in which the motivation for a quantum
theory, the Schrédinger equation, and the genetal framework of wave mechanics
ate coveted, A number of simple problems ate solved in Chapter 5, and their
relevance to physical phenomena is discussed. The generalization to many
particles and to three dimensions is developed. The second-quarter material deals,
directly with acomic physics problems and uses somewhat more sophisticered
tools. Here we discuss operator methods (Chapter 7), angular momentum
(Chapter 11), the hydrogen atom (Chapter 12), operators, macrices, and spin
(Chapter 14), the addition of angular momenta (Chapter 15), time-independent
perturbation theory (Chapter 16), and the real hydrogen atom (Chapter 17).
‘This material prepares the student to cope with a large variety of problems that
are discussed duting the third and lust quarter. These problems include the inter-
action of chaeged particles with a magnetic field (Chaptet 13), the helium atom
(Chapter 18), problems in the radiation of atoms and related topics (Chapters 22
and 23), collision theory (Chaprer 24), and the absorption of radiation in macrer
(Chapter 25). This material is supplemented by a’ more qualitative discussion of
the struccure of atoms and molecules (Chapters 19 to 21). The last chapter on
elementary particles and theit symmetries setves the dual purpose of describing
some of the recent advances on that frontier of physics and of showing how the
basic ideas of quantum theory have found applicability in the domain of very
short distances.
Several topics arise naturally as digressions in the development of the
subject matter. Instead of lengthening some long chapters, I have placed this
material in a seperate “Special Topics” section. There, telativistic kinematics,
the equivalence principle, the WKB approximation, a detailed treatment of
lifetimes, line widths and scattering resonances, and the Yukawa theory of
nuclear forces are discussed. For the same season, a brief introduction to the
Fourier integral, the Dirac dela function, and some formal material dealing
with operators have been placed in mathematical appendices at the end of the
beok.
Lam indebted to my colleagues at the University of Minnesota, especially
Benjamin Bayman and Donald Geffen, for many discussions on the subject of
quantum mechanics. I am grateful to Eugen Merzbacher, who read the manu-
script and made many helpful suggestions for improvements. I also thank my
students in the introductory quantum mechanics course that I taught for several
years. Their evident interest in the subject led me to the writing of the supple-
mencal notes that later became this book.
Stephen Gasiorowiexcontents
Chapter 1 The Limits of Classical Physics 1
Black Body Radiation: the laws of Wien and Rayleigh-Jeans; the
Planck formula. 'The Phoroelecttic Effect. The Compvon Eifect.
Electron Diffraction, The Bohr Atom: the postulates; experimental
consequences; the Correspondence Principle. The Wave-Particle
Problem.
Chapter 2 Wave Packets and the Uncertainty Relations 27
The gaussian wave packer; che propagation of packets; group
velocity; the De Broglie relation. The Uncertainty Relations:
measurement of position of an clectron; the two-slit experiment;
the “reality” of orbits ia the Bohr atom; the energy-time
uncertainty relation; the uses of the relations for numerical
estimates.
Chapter 3. The Schrédinger Wave Equation 45
so ‘The fee particle equation. The probability interpretation. Flux
conservation, Expectation values. The momentum opetator. The
reality of expectation values. The equation for a particle in 2
, porential.x Contents
Chapter 4 Eigenfunctions and Eigenvalues
‘The energy eigenvalue equation. The particle in a box:
eigenfunctions and eigenvalues; orthogonality of eigenfunctions;
the expansion postulace and the interpretation of the expansion
coefficients, Parity. Momentum eigenfunctions; unnormalizable
states; degeneracy and simultaneous cigenfunctions.
Chapter 5 One-Dimensional Potentials
The potential step; reflection and transmission coefficients, The
potential well and bound states. The potential bartier: tunnelling;
cold emission; tunnelling chrough thin films; alpha decay. One-
dimensional models of molecules and the delta-function potential.
The Kronig-Penney model. The harnonic oscillator.
Chaprer 6 ~The General Structure of Wave Mechanics
Eigenfunctions and the expansion theorem; analogy with vector
spaces. Linear operators; hermitian operators; completeness;
degenetacy; complete sets of commuting observables. The
uncertainty relations. The classical limit of quantum theory.
Chapter 7 Operator Methods in Quantum Mechanics
The harmonic oscillator problem: raising and lowering operators;
eigenstates and eigenvalues. The interpretation of the wave fanction
as probability amplitude. The time-development of a system in
terms of operators; the Schrédinger and the Heisenbetg pictures.
Chapter 8 N-Particle Systems
The Schrédinger equation for N-particle systems. Momentum
conservation; separation of center of mass motion; reduced mass,
Identical particles; symmetry under their interchange, The Panli
Principle. Fermions and bosons in a box; the Fermi energy.
Chapter 9 ‘The Schrédinger Equation in Three Dimensions
Separation of center-of-mass motion; invariance under rotations;
the separation of angular momentum. The redial equation. Fermi
effergy for three-dimensional box.
Chaprer 10 Angular Momentum
‘The expression for L?; algebraic method for solving the L, and L* '
eigenvalue problem; raising and lowering operarors; Legendre
fanctions.
$7
75
111
127
141Contents
Chapter 11 The Radial Equation
Behavior at the origin; behavior for large r. The free particle;
spherical Bessel functions; incoming and outgoing spherical waves;
phase shifts. The squate well: bound states; deep wells; shell
stracture; continuum solutions.
Chapter 12. The Hydrogen Atom
Simplification of the radial equation. Quantum numbers;
degeneracy. Wave functions and relations to “orbits.”
Chapter 13 Interaction of Electeons with Electromagnetic Field
Maxwell equations. Coupling of electrons to vecror potential.
Equation for electron in a uniform magnetic feld, The normal
Zeeman effect. Electron motion in a uniform magnetic field;
illustration of correspondence principle. Flux quantization; the
Bohm-Aharanoy Effect.
Chapter 14 Operators, Matrices, and Spin
Matrix representation of harmonic oscillator operators. Matrix
representation of angular momentum 1 operators. Spin
matrices; spinors, The precession of spin in a magnetic field;
paramagnetic resonance.
Chapter 15 The Addition of Angular Momenta
The addition of two spins }4; singlet and wiplet cigeafunctions.
Spin-orbital angular momentum addition. The Exclusion
Principle and angular momencum staces.
Chapter 16 Time Independent Perturbation Theory
First-order energy shift. Second-order perturbation theory.
Degenerate perturbation theory. The Stark Effect: absence of linear
shift for ground state; electric dipole moments; second-order shift,
Linear Stark effect for 2 = 2 states.
Chapter 17. The Real Hydrogen Atom
Relativistic mass corrections. Spin-orbit coupling. Anomalous
Zeeman Effect; Hyperfine interaction.
& Chapter 18 The Helium Atom
4
First approximation. First-order shift due to ¢-¢ cepulsion, The first
excited states. Exchange energy. The Ritz vatiational principle.
Autoionization.
xi
179
195
209
227
245
255
271
283xii Contents
Chapter 19 The Structure of Atoms
“The variational principle and the Hartree equations. The periodic
table. Qualitative discussion of consequences of shel] structure in
ators,
Chapter 20 Molecules
Approximate Schrodinger equation; electronic, vibrational, and
rotational motion, The H+ molecule; vatiational trial wave
function; spins of nuclei and spectra; specific heats of molecules
Chapter 21 Molecular Structure
‘The H; molecule. Molecular orbitals. Bonds. Qualitative description
of some simple molecules; hybrid orbitals.
Chapter 22 The Radiation of Atoms
Time dependent perturbation theory. The electromagnetic
interactions; semiclassical description; phase space; the Golden
Rule, Matrix element calculation; selection rules; the 2P ~— 18
transition rate. The effects of spin.
Chapter 23 Selected Topics in Radiative Transitions
Lifetime and line width; collision broadening; Doppler shift.
‘Méssbauer Effect, Induced absorption and emission, The lasct.
‘Chapter 24 Collision Theory
Collision cross section; optical theorem; inelastic cross sections.
Black disc scattering, Scattering ar low energies; resonant
scattering for square well; effective range formula. Spin dependence
in neucroa-proton scatrering. The Born approximation. Scattering
of identical particles. Coherent scattering and the Bragg conditions.
Chapter 25 The Absorption of Radiation in Matter
The photoelectric effect; angular dependence; energy dependence.
Compion scattering. Antiparticles, and pair production
Chapter 26° Elementary Particles and Their Symmetries
Blectrons and positrons; positronium and its decay modes; charge
conjugation. Baryons, antibaryons, and mesons. Isotopic spin
conservation, The ptoblem of A° decay and production; associated
production; the scrangeness quantum number; selection rules,
Unitary symmeuy; the discovery of the a-, the quark model. Parity
nanconservation in K decay; general tests. The K° — K° system.
299
341
365
379
42sContents
Special Topics
‘I. Relativistic Kinematics
Il, The Equivalence Principle
If. The Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin Approximation
IV. Lifetimes, Line Widths, and Resonances
Vv. The Yukawa Theory
Appendices
A, The Fourier Integral and Dela Functions
B. Operators
References
Physical Constants
Index
xiii
459
461
469
473
481
487
489
495
501
507
509ie
chapter 1
The Limits of Classical Physics
The end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth
witnessed a crisis in physics. A setics of experimental results required concepts
totally incompatible with classical physics. The development of these concepts,
in a fascinating interplay of radical conjectures and brilliant experiments, led
finally to the qaamtum sheory.' Out objective in this chapter is to describe the
background of this crisis and, armed with hindsight, to expose the new concepts
in a manner chat, while not historically correct, will make the transition to
quantum theory less mysterious for the reader. The new concepts, the particle
properties of radiation, the wave properties of matter, and the quantization of physical
quantities will emerge in the phenomena discussed below.
A. Black Body Radiation
When a body is heated, it is scen to radiate, In equilibrium the light
emitted ranges over the whole spectrum of frequencies v, with a spectral distri-
bution thar depends boch on the frequency or, equivalently, on the wavelength
of the light ); and on the temperature, One may define a quantity E(A, T), the
emissive power, as the energy emitted ac wavelength ) per unit area, per unit
time. Theoretical research in the field of thermal radiation began in 1859 with
the work of Kirchhoff, who showed that for a given X, the ratio of the emissive
power E to the absorptivity 4, defined as the fraction of incident radiation of
wavelength d that is absorbed by the body, is the same for all bodies, Kirchhoff
considered two emitting and absorbing parallel plates and showed from the
equilibrium condition that the energy emitted was equal to the energy absorbed
(for cach 4), that the ratios E/A must be the same for the two plates. Soon
An interesting account of the development of quantum theory may be found in
M. Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York,
1966,2 Quantum Physics
thereafter, he observed that for a black body, defined as a surface that totally
absorbs all radiation that falls on it, so that A = 1, the function E(A, T) is a
universal function.
In order to study this function it is necessary co obtain the best possible
source of black body radiation. A practical sofution to this problem is to con-
sider the radiation emerging from a small hole in an enclosure heated to a tem-
perature T. Given the imperfections in the surface of the inside of the cavity,
ic is clear that any radiation falling on the hole will have no chance of emerging
again. Thus the surface presented by the hole is very nearly “totally absorbing,”
and consequently the radiation coming from it is indeed “black body radiation.”
Provided the hole is small enough, this radiation will be the same as that which
falls on the walls of the cavity. It is therefore necessary to understand the distti-
bution of radiation inside a cavity whose walls are at a temperature T.
Kirchhoff showed chat the second law of chermodynamics requires that
the radiation in the cavity be isotropic, that is, that the flux be independent of
direction; that it be homogeneous, that is, the same at all points; and that it be
the same in al] cavities at the same temperatute—all of this for each wavelength*
‘The emissive power may, by simple geomectic arguments, be shown to be
connected with the energy density «(s, T) inside the cavity. The relation is
wo, = SRD a)
‘The energy density is the quantity of theoretical interest, and further under-
standing of it came in 1894 from the work of Wien, who, again using very
general arguments, showed that the energy density had to be of the form
uA, T) =X? fat) (4-2)
with f still an unknown function of a single vatiable. If, as is convenient, one
deals instead with the energy density as a function of frequency, x(», T), then it
follows from the fact that
alo, T) = ah, n|o
= 5p HT) (1-3)
2 These matters are discussed in many textbooks on modern physics and statisticel
physics. References can he found at the end of this chapter.
4 Wien considered a perfectly selecting spherical cavity contracting adiabatically.
The redistribution of the energy as a function of A has to be caused by the Doppler shift
on reflection. See Chap:er V in F. K, Richunyer, B. H. Kennard, and J. N. Cooper Intro.
duction to Modern Physics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.The Limits of Classical Physics 3
ee T= 1409°K
nS T= 1646"K
of T= 1259°K
Ya
Fig. 1-1, Experimental verification of Eq. 1-2 in the form u(,7)/TS = a
universal function of x7.
that the Wien law reads
aly, T) = v¥g (2) (1-4)
The implications of this law, which was confirmed experimentally (Fig. 1.1),
are twofold:
1. Given the spectral distribution of black body radiation at one tem-
peracure, the distribution at any other temperature can be found with the help
of the expressions given above.
2. If the function f(x)—or, equivalently, the function g(x)—has a maxi-
mum for some value of x > 0, then the waveleagth Ayes at which the energy
density, and hence the emissive power, has its maximum value, has the form
A
Drax = Tr Ga-s)
where 4 is a universal constant.
Wien used a model (of no interest, except to the historian) to predict a
foun for g(v/T). The form was
s0/T) = cree ao.
and, remarkably enough, this form, containing two adjustable parameters, fit
the high frequency (low wavelength) data very well. ‘The formula is not, how:4 Quantum Physics
a)
Planck
\
\ se Paviich— sears
477 1
10,000 20,000 30,003 40,000 50,000 20,000 40,000 60,000
Waveloagth in A ~——> Wavelength in 8 ——>
@ )
Fig. 1-2. (4) Distribution of power radiated by a black body at various tempera-
tures, (8) Comparison of daca ar 1600°K with Planck formula and Rayleigh-Jeans
formula,
exer, in accord with some very general notions of classical physics. Rayleigh, in
1900, derived the result
uy, T) = we aT (1-7)
where & is Boltzmann's constant, & = 1.38 X 107" erg/deg and cis the velocity
of light, ¢ = 3.00 X 10" cm/sec. The ingredients that went into the derivation
were (1) the classical law of equipartition of energy, according to which the
average energy per degree of freedom for a dynamical system in equilibrium is,
in this context,' AT, and (2) the calculation of the number of modes (i.c., degrees
of freedom) for electromagnetic radiation with frequency in che interval (», » +
dy), confined in a cavity.®
“The equipantition law predicts tha: che energy per degsee of freedom is &T/2, For
an oscillator—and the modes of the electromegnetic field ate simple harmonic oscillacors—
a contriburion of £1/2 from the kinetic energy is marched by a like contribution from the
potential energy, giving £7.
5 We will need this result again, and derive it in Chapter 23. The number of modes is
dest/ct, further muliplied by a factor of 2 because transverse electromagnetic waves cor-
respond to two-dimensional harmonic oscillators .The Limits of Classical Physics 5
‘The Rayleigh-Jeans law (1-7) (Jeans made a minor contribution to its
derivation) does not agree with experiment at high frequencies, where the Wien
formula works, though it does fir the experimental curve at low frequencies
(Fig. 1.2). The Rayleigh-Jeans law cannot, on genetal grounds, be correct, since
the toral energy density (integrated over all frequencies) is predicted to be
infinite!
In 1900, Max Planck found a formula by an ingenious interpolation
between the high-frequency Wien formula and the low-frequency Rayleigh-
Jeans law. The formula is
ay, T) = Set ae 7 (1-8)
where 4, Planck's constant, is an adjustable parameter whose numerical value was
found to be 4 = 6.63 X 10-* erg sec. This law approaches the Rayleigh Jeans
form when v > 0, and reduces to
at) = hewn emi
h
= = venir (9)
when the frequency is large, or, more accurately, when hy >> &T. If we rewsite
the formula as a product of che number of modes [we obtain this from (1-7) by
dividing the energy density by #T] and another factor that can be interpreted as
the average enetpy per degree of freedom
sx? hy
eT) = FD eat
ant buf AT
=a Ter 4 (1-10)
‘we see that the classical equipartition law is altered whenever the frequencies ate
not small compared with &T/k. This altetation in che equiparcition law shows
that the modes have an avetage energy that depends on their frequency, and
that the high frequency modes have a very small average energy. This effective
cut-off removes che difficulty of the Rayleigh-Jeans density formula: the total
energy in a cavity of unit volume is no longer infinite. We have
Bek f° vt
ur) = ef. by eat
_ Sah (ETNA (ho /kT)* db /KE)
“at Nas jg eet
= StH f .
=e T ° we
(Qin)6 — Quantum Physics
The integral can be evaluated,* and the result is the Scefan-Bolczmann expression
for the total radiation energy per unit volume
U(T) = aT! (1-12)
with a = 7.56 X 107 erg/cm? deg’, derived much earlier, except for the
numerical constant in front, on the basis of thermodynamical reasoning. A
departure from the pure equipattition law was not entitely unexpected: one
consequence of it was the Dulong-Petit law of specific heats, according to
which the product of the atomic (or molecular) weight and che specific heat is a
constant for all solids; yet departures from the Dulong-Petit predictions were
observed as eatly as 1872.7 These departures indicated that the specific heat
decreased at lowet temperatures.*
The unqualified success of his formula drove Planck to search for’ its
origin, and within two months he found that he could derive it by assuming
that the energy associated with each mode of the electcomegnetic field did not
vaty continuously (with average value £T) but was an integral multiple of some
minimum quantum of energy & Under these circumstances a calculation of the
average energy associated with cach mode, using the Boltzmann probability
distribution in a system of equilibrium at temperature T,
(1-13)
led to
be
u
2 HPe)
7
SS ag cotir
=O,
> oer
as
«ore ~ 2
i) det (ee 19 -f de xtere em
. > =
i. * os
“Sete Ore — 8 2
+ Aceording co the equipertition law an assembly of N oscillators (and a lattice of
atoms with elastic forces between them may be so viewed) will have enevgy 3NET, the
factor 3 coming from the fact that the oscillarots in ¢ solid are three-dimensional, rather
than two-dimensional as for the radiition eld in an enclosure. The specific heat for a mole
is obtained by cifferendating with respece co T and setting N — No, Avogadro's number,
so that C, = 3Nok = 3K where K = 8.28 x 10° erg /deg.
® Specific heats will be discussed very briefly in Chaprer 20.‘The Limits of Classical Physics 7
t
de
-e 2 Ree
ard
eet
1 | eaeser
&
= om Tj (1-14)
This agrees with (I-10) provided we make che identification
b&=h (1-15)
and do not change the number of modes.
Planck argued that for some unknown teason the atoms in the walls of the
cavity emitted radiation in “quanta” with energy rév (x = 1,2,3,. . .), but
consistency demanded, as established by Einstein a few years later, that electro.
magnetic radiation bebaved as if it consisted of a collecivn of energy quanta with
energy bv2
The energy cattied per quantum is extremely small. For light in the
optical range, with, say, 4 = 6000 A,
3.3 X 10 erg
so that the number of light quanta of this wavelength, emitted by a 100-wart
soutce, say, is
100 X 107 10 ,
= 33x 19 = 3X 10° quanta/sec
‘With so many quanta present, it is perhaps not surprising that we do not ex-
perience the particle nature of light directly; we shall see that on a macroscopic
scale no deviations from classical optics are expected, Nevertheless, Planck's
interpretation of his formula radically changes our picture of radiation.
‘
'B, The Photoelectric Effect
As successful as the Planck formula was, the conclusion from it of the
quantum, nature of radiation is hardly compelling, An important contribution
to its acceptance came from the work of Albert Einstein, who in 1905 used the
°Fot e given frequency » there snay be any integral number of quanta present, and
hence the energy can take on the values mb, with 2 = 0,1,2,3,....8 Quantum Physics
concept of the quantum nature of light to explain some peculiat properties of
metals, when these ate irradiated with visible and ultraviolec lighc. ~
In 1887, the photoelectric effect was discovered by Hertz, who, while
engaged in his famous experiments on electromagnetic waves, found that the
length of the spark induced in the secondary circuit was reduced when the
terminals of the spark gap were shielded from the ultraviolet light coming from
the spark in the primary circuit. His observations attracted much interest and the
following facts were established by fusther experiments:
1. When polished metal plates are irradiated, they may emit electrons;!*
they do not emit positive ions.
2, Whether the plates emit electrons depends on the wavelengch of the
light. In general there will be a threshold that varies from metal co metal: only
light with a frequency greater than a given threshold frequency will produce a
photoelectric current.
3. The magnitude of the current, when it exists, is proportional to the
intensity of the light source.
4, The energy of the photoelectrons is independent of the intensity of the
light source but varies linearly with the frequency of the incident light.
Although the existence of the photoelectric effect can be understood.
within the framework of classical electromagnetic theory, since it was known
tha there were electrons in metals, and one could imagine them to be accelerated
by absorption of radiation, the frequency-dependence of the effect is not compre-
hensible within that framework. The energy cartied by an electromagnetic wave
is proportional to the-intensity of the source, and frequency has nothing to do
with ic, Furthermore, a classical explanation of the effect, which would have co
involve the concentration of the energy deposited on single photoelectrons,
would catty with it an implied time delay between the arrival of the radiation
and the departure of the electron, the delay being longer when the intensity is
decreased. In fact, no such time delays were ever observed, at least none longer
than 10-® sec, even with incident tadiation of very low intensity.
Einstein considered the radiation to consist of a collection of quanta of
energy 4v, where » is the frequency of the light. ‘The absorption of a single
quantum by an electron—a process chat may take less time than the upper
limit quoted above—increases the electron energy by an amount by. Some of
the energy must be expended to separate the clectton from the metal. This
amount, W (called the work function), might be expected to vary from metal to
metal, but should not depend on the electton energy. The rest is available for
the electron kinetic energy, so that on the basis of this picture one expects that
1.9 This was established by an ¢/m measurement.‘The Limits of Classical Physics s
y= 87 X10" seem?
4080 ~60.~«70 += B0 «80 100~«110~—~*t20
¥ x0 sac
Fig. 1-3. Photoelectric effect data showing a plot of retarding
porential necessary to stop electron flow from a meral (lithium),
or equivalently, electron kinetic energy, as a function of frequency
of the incident light. ‘The slope of the line is h/e.
the following relation between electron velocity » and light frequency »
hav? = hy — (1-26)
should hold. The threshold effect and the linear telation between electron
kinetic energy and the frequency ate contained in this formula, The propor-
tionality of the cusrent and the source intensity can also be understood in terms