Tool: A Step-By-Step Guide To Begin With Your Analytics Initiative
Tool: A Step-By-Step Guide To Begin With Your Analytics Initiative
Tool: A Step-By-Step Guide To Begin With Your Analytics Initiative
Analytics Initiative
Published 14 July 2020 - ID G00729782 - 13 min read
By Analyst(s): Kurt Schlegel, Melissa Davis
Initiatives: Executive Leadership: Data and Analytics; Analytics, BI and Data Science
Solutions
Overview
Executive leaders responsible for starting an analytics initiative in their organizations
should use this Tool. It is based on four questions:
1. What is analytics?
This Tool answers these questions in a way broadly applicable to any vertical market or
horizontal domain.
When to Use
Executive leaders looking to start an analytics initiative in their organizations should use
this Tool. It is based on four key questions:
1. What Is Analytics?
Downloadable Attachments
Applied_Analytics_Guide_729782.pptx
This Microsoft PowerPoint file starts with a one-page vision that defines analytics in three
verbs: measure, classify and decide. The second slide defines the key roles needed to
conduct analytics initiatives. The third shows how analytics content should be created
quickly as prototypes and then promoted to a production tier. The fourth identifies three
key areas of business benefit that a successful analytics initiative typically provides. The
fifth provides a list of steps to follow. These can be applied to any aspect of your
company. Executive leaders can use this slide deck to communicate a simple plan for how
to get started with analytics, regardless of their organization’s current level of analytics
maturity.
How to Use
The slides provide answers to four key questions. Executive leaders can use these
answers as a generic framework that can be applied to virtually any analytics situation in
any vertical or horizontal domain.
“Measure, classify and decide” is not meant to replace “descriptive, diagnostic, predictive
and prescriptive.” These four styles are the foundation of the analytic continuum.
“Measure, classify and decide” is just a simpler way to communicate the essence of
analytics to an audience of beginners.
Measure
Analytics is fundamentally about measurement. This is the place to start any analytics
initiative. Too often, organizations start with the data. Executive leaders should work with
their peers and encourage their direct reports to participate in a project to create a data
dictionary. They should work with them to help create a performance metrics framework,
too. More often than not, they will be more enthusiastic about the latter project.
■ In addition to KPIs, can we identify other measures that really matter to our
business?
■ Can we set goals and target values for what those measures ought to be?
■ Are we monitoring actual performance against the goal for each measure?
Classify
■ How well can we dive into our data and identify the most important attributes?
■ Can we identify which attributes are most representative of customers who are
likely to churn? Which parts are likely to break? Which employees are likely to
succeed? What is the root cause?
Performing this type of classification of data requires an ability to drill into the details,
blend disparate data sources and create custom groups. Eventually, this analysis can be
used to create taxonomies that describe customers, products and employees — all the
entities that matter to a business. This type of classification is often done with the help of
both visual data discovery tools (to identify categories visually) and machine learning (to
discover clusters, associations and perform classification algorithmically).
Decide
Progressing to the right side of Slide 1 confirms that the analytics program has matured
from measurement and classification to a more empirical and transparent system of
decision making. This is a more advanced analytics activity that few organizations have
yet achieved.
Only the most innovative organizations have created an analytics program focused on
evaluating how they make decisions empirically. These organizations put their decision-
making process under scrutiny, with an intent not to penalize but to learn from and avoid
mistakes. Organizations that have adopted this style of decision management typically
answer “yes” to the following questions:
■ Does your organization outline each decision with a creative list of available
alternatives?
■ Does your organization build transparency into each decision, making it clear who
makes each decision?
■ Is there a step in the process for an extreme devil’s advocate to challenge decisions
in order to help avoid key biases (such as availability bias and confirmation bias)?
This may be a simple view of analytics, but improving how your organization measures,
classifies and decides empirically — with precision and granularity — will make a big
impact on your success. Now that we have defined and communicated what analytics is,
we need to define who will do the work.
The old analytics “playbook” relies on teams of specialists to perform tasks and then
pass the associated projects on to another team of specialists, which does likewise, and
so on. This model is extremely ineffective when building analytics solutions, particularly
when you are not sure what you are aiming for.
This requires a new organizational model in which the cross-functional teams operate at
both centralized and decentralized layers. This type of model has huge benefits for
knowledge sharing. It also gets around the virtual impossibility of training a data scientist
in a business domain in a short time. Moreover, the joint development fostered by cross-
functional teams leads to more rapid iterations of analytic content, which makes this one
of the best ways to reduce the risk of failing to meet requirements.
One problem with the old business intelligence (BI) playbook leaders is a lack of
resources. There are never enough people on the central team to empower decentralized,
domain-specific teams.
Domain-specific teams have to be created mostly from local resources. As with most
strategies and playbooks, successful outcomes depend on having the right personnel.
Executive leaders should:
■ Identify key individuals who are already performing data integration and data
science tasks locally.
■ Ensure training of these individuals to perform the semiformal roles of citizen data
integrator and citizen data scientist, and empower them with a “prototype first”
mindset.
■ Encourage these individuals to play a more collaborative role in the overall analytics
program.
These individuals may be trained by central resources, and their skills augmented by the
increasing array of self-service technologies that reduce the skill level required to use
analytics tools.
Analytics ROI success stories can often be grouped into three categories. Obviously, there
are many other ways in which analytics can drive ROI (such as route optimization). But
three categories are vertically agnostic and as a result broadly applicable. It doesn’t matter
if your organization sells insurance, manufactures durable goods or provides healthcare,
oris in the private or public sector. Every organization has an opportunity to benefit from
the following three categories:
Resource Allocation
Every organization allocates resources such as head count, budget and inventory. Allocate
too little and you have a quality problem. Allocate too much and you have a cost problem.
A precise system of measurement can enable organizations to allocate just enough head
count, budget or inventory to balance the cost/quality trade-off.
Conversion Optimization
Every organization needs to segment its business, customers, employees and products.
The capability to classify with granularity can enable organizations to personalize their
business processes and, therefore, improve conversion ratios.
One can think of most business processes as trying to “convert” an undesirable situation
into a desirable one. We convert prospects into customers, opening trouble tickets into
closed trouble tickets and converting raw materials into finished goods. We convert new
recruits into fully trained employees. Our ability to collect disparate data sources and build
granular micro-segmentation models often using clustering can help us to identify
particular segments. We can personalize the business process and show ROI by
improving the conversion rate.
Outlier Detection
Where is the benefit in comparative benchmarking? The answer lies in outlier detection.
Through comparative benchmarking, organizations can identify the positive outliers, learn
their best practices and use them to remediate the negative outliers.
“How to Create Data and Analytics Everywhere for Everyone: Top Insights for Digital
Business”
Disclaimer: Unless otherwise marked for external use, the items in this Gartner Tool are for
internal noncommercial use by the licensed Gartner client. The materials contained in this
Tool may not be repackaged or resold. Gartner makes no representations or warranties as
to the suitability of this Tool for any particular purpose, and disclaims all liabilities for any
damages, whether direct, consequential, incidental or special, arising out of the use of or
inability to use this material or the information provided herein.