Evaluation Checklist and Summary of Findings
Evaluation Checklist and Summary of Findings
Instructions:
1. Carefully read the modules page by page to evaluate its compliance to standards indicated in
the criterion items under the six (6) factors below.
2. Put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is
NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the error/deficiency found, and give your
recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings form.
3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that do not apply in the modules evaluated.
Standard/Criterion Items YES NO
Factor I. Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs)
1. The SLM covered the targeted Most Essential Learning Competencies
(MELCs) intended for the quarter.
2. SLM uses a variety (at least 3) of self-directed techniques, learning tasks, and
formative assessments.
5. SLM allows for review, comparison, and integration with previous lessons (if
applicable).
7. SLM uses process questions and activities which require different levels of
cognitive domain to achieve desired learning outcomes.
1
8. SLM has written and performance tasks that are differentiated based on target
user’s multiple intelligences, learning styles, and readiness levels.
2
9. SLM develops 21st century skills and higher order cognition (i.e., critical
thinking, creativity, learning by doing, problem solving).
5. The SLM has assessment activities that ensure active engagement of the
learners.
6. The SLM has answer keys that provide exact answers for objective-type
assessments and discussion points for non-objective types.
7.The SLM has pre- and post- assessment items that are constructed differently.
Factor V. Readability
1. Vocabulary used in the SLM is appropriate to the target user’s level of
comprehension and experience.
3. Paragraph structures in the SLM facilitate smooth flow of ideas and concepts.
4. Topics and ideas presented from one lesson to the next are coherent and
integrated with each other.
3
5.Instructions, discussion points, questions, and activities are clear to the target
users.
2. The references are properly cited in the Reference List containing the
following:
- Name of creator - Title of source
- Publication details; publisher, location of
publisher, date of publication, etc.
Prepared by:
ANNEX 1B
4
EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR LANGUAGE
For DepEd-Developed Self-Learning Modules
Title/s: _____________________________________________________
Instructions:
4. Carefully read the modules page by page to evaluate its compliance to standards indicated in
the criterion items under the six (6) factors below.
5. Put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is
NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the error/deficiency found, and give your
recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings form.
6. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that do not apply in the modules evaluated.
Standard/Criterion Items YES NO
Category A. Coherence and Clarity of Thought
5
6. Does the set of SLMs have no overused words?
3. Is the use of the serial comma (comma before and and or) observed?
Category D. Consistency in Style
1. Where alternative spellings are permitted, was a choice made and used
consistently throughout the materials?
2. Are main heads, subheads, sections, and subsections consistently
classified?
Prepared by:
ANNEX 1C
6
Learning Area: Grade Level: Quarter:
2. The size of letters in each page is appropriate for the target user.
3. Font styles in each page are appropriate for the target user.
7
4. Each page observe proper spacing between letters, words, and
paragraphs
Prepared by:
Summary of Findings
for DepEd-developed Self-Learning Modules (SLMs)
8
Title of SLMs: _________________________________________________________
Instruction: For all NO answers provided in the respective evaluation tools, indicate in this
template the following: specific modules, paragraphs, and pages where the errors/ deficiencies are
found (1st column), the brief description of the errors/deficiencies observed ( 2nd column), the type
of error (3rd column), and the specific recommendations to improve the identified error / deficiency
(4th column). Additional rows may be added as necessary.
Module
Number / Type of Error
Page number (Write C for
Brief Description of Errors/ Findings/ Content, L for Specific Recommendations to Improving
Paragraph /
Observations Language, or Identified Error / Deficiency
Line / (in F for Layout/
chronological Format)
order)
9
10
•
I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendations are my/our own and have been
made without any undue influence from others:
Evaluator(s):
MOHAMAR D. RINDO
(Signature over printed name) Signature
RYAN G.TULOD
(Signature over printed name) Signature
11
Date Accomplished: JULY 13, 2021
12