0% found this document useful (0 votes)
334 views12 pages

Evaluation Checklist and Summary of Findings

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
334 views12 pages

Evaluation Checklist and Summary of Findings

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

ANNEX 1A

EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR CONTENT


For DepEd-developed Self-Learning Modules

Learning Area: __ Grade Level: __ Quarter: __


Title/s: ________________________________________________________

Instructions:
1. Carefully read the modules page by page to evaluate its compliance to standards indicated in
the criterion items under the six (6) factors below.
2. Put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is
NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the error/deficiency found, and give your
recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings form.
3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that do not apply in the modules evaluated.
Standard/Criterion Items YES NO
Factor I. Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs)
1. The SLM covered the targeted Most Essential Learning Competencies
(MELCs) intended for the quarter.

2. The SLM sufficiently developed the targeted Most Essential Learning


Competencies (MELCs) intended for the quarter.

Factor II. Instructional Design and Organization


1. SLM has learning objectives that are anchored on the MELCs.

2. SLM uses a variety (at least 3) of self-directed techniques, learning tasks, and
formative assessments.

3. SLM has content that is logically developed and organized, i.e.,


lessons/activities are arranged from simple to complex, from observable to
abstract.

4. SLM contains essential instructional design elements that contribute to the


achievement of learning objectives.

5. SLM allows for review, comparison, and integration with previous lessons (if
applicable).

6. SLM uses various motivational strategies (i.e., advance organizers, puzzles,


games) to hook the target user’s interest and engagement.

7. SLM uses process questions and activities which require different levels of
cognitive domain to achieve desired learning outcomes.

1
8. SLM has written and performance tasks that are differentiated based on target
user’s multiple intelligences, learning styles, and readiness levels.

2
9. SLM develops 21st century skills and higher order cognition (i.e., critical
thinking, creativity, learning by doing, problem solving).

10. SLM integrates desirable values and traits.

Factor III. Instructional Quality of Text and Visuals


1. All contents in the SLM are accurate.

2. The SLM is free from any social content violations.

3. The SLM has free from factual errors.

4. The SLM is free from computational errors (if applicable).

Factor IV. Assessment


1. The SLM provides sufficient assessment activities that will help the learner
track his/her progress and mastery of the target competencies

Note: There should at least 3 assessment activities in a module..


2. SLM has assessments that are aligned with the specific objectives and
contents (i.e., lesson / topic).

3. The SLM provides variety of assessment types.


Note: There should at least 3 assessment types in a module.

4. The SLM contains assessments that have clear demonstrations / examples,


instructions, and/or rubrics to serve as guide on how these will be used.

5. The SLM has assessment activities that ensure active engagement of the
learners.

6. The SLM has answer keys that provide exact answers for objective-type
assessments and discussion points for non-objective types.

7.The SLM has pre- and post- assessment items that are constructed differently.

Factor V. Readability
1. Vocabulary used in the SLM is appropriate to the target user’s level of
comprehension and experience.

2. Length and structures of sentences in the SLM are suited to the


comprehension level of the target users,

3. Paragraph structures in the SLM facilitate smooth flow of ideas and concepts.

4. Topics and ideas presented from one lesson to the next are coherent and
integrated with each other.

3
5.Instructions, discussion points, questions, and activities are clear to the target
users.

Factor VI. Referencing and Source Citation


1. The copyrighted texts and visuals are accurately cited on the page where
they are presented (i.e., primary and/or original sources are cited) containing the
following:
- Title of the work
- Name of creator
- Title of source
-Title of source where the work is included, and/or publication details

2. The references are properly cited in the Reference List containing the
following:
- Name of creator - Title of source
- Publication details; publisher, location of
publisher, date of publication, etc.

Prepared by:

Evaluator 1: SERAPION P. CABATINGAN, JR Signature:

Evaluator 2: ALMA L. CARBONILLA, EDD Signature:


Evaluator 3: KIMBERLY CLER G. SUAREZ Signature:
Evaluator 4: MOHAMAR D. RINDO Signature:
Evaluator 5: RYAN G. TULOD Signature:

Date: July 13, 2021

ANNEX 1B

4
EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR LANGUAGE
For DepEd-Developed Self-Learning Modules

Learning Area: ________________ Grade Level: ________ Quarter: _______

Title/s: _____________________________________________________

Instructions:
4. Carefully read the modules page by page to evaluate its compliance to standards indicated in
the criterion items under the six (6) factors below.
5. Put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is
NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the error/deficiency found, and give your
recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings form.
6. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that do not apply in the modules evaluated.
Standard/Criterion Items YES NO
Category A. Coherence and Clarity of Thought

1. Do the statements / phrases make sense?

2. Do the sentences in the paragraph contribute to one idea?

3. Are the thoughts / ideas logically sequenced?


4. Are conjunctions and transitional phrases used to link sentences or
paragraphs?

5. Is the choice of words / expressions appropriate?

6. Is the length of sentences appropriate to the target learners?

7. Is the language appropriate for the target learners?

8. Are the headings or titles appropriate to the content?


9. Is there proportional or equal treatment of topics of the same
importance?
Category B. Grammar and Syntax

1. Does the set of SLMs have correct subject - verb agreement?

2. Does the set of SLMs have correct placement of modifiers?

3. Does the set of SLMs have clear antecedents?

4. Does the set of SLMs have correct parallel construction?

5. Does the set of SLMs have no split infinitives?

5
6. Does the set of SLMs have no overused words?

7. Does the set of SLMs have no redundancies?


Category C. Spelling and Punctuation

1. Are words, whether local or foreign, correctly spelled?

2. Are the right punctuations in the right places?

3. Is the use of the serial comma (comma before and and or) observed?
Category D. Consistency in Style

1. Where alternative spellings are permitted, was a choice made and used
consistently throughout the materials?
2. Are main heads, subheads, sections, and subsections consistently
classified?

3. Is the need for the same tense or person observed?


4. Are the rules on capitalization, hyphenation, setting off in italics or boldface
followed?
5. Is there consistence in phraseology of titles, presentation or introduction of
new chapters or units?

Prepared by:

Evaluator 1: ALMA L. CARBONILLA, EdD Signature:


Evaluator 2: KIMBERLY CLER G. SUAREZ Signature:
Evaluator 3: MOHAMAR D. RINDO Signature: Evaluator 4: RYAN G. TULOD
Signature:

Date: July 13, 2021

ANNEX 1C

Evaluation Checklist for Layout and Format


of DepEd-developed Self-Learning Modules

6
Learning Area: Grade Level: Quarter:

Module Title/s: __________________________________________________________


Instructions:
7. Carefully read the modules page by page to evaluate its compliance to standards indicated in
the criterion items under the three (3) factors below.
8. Put a check mark () in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is
NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the error/deficiency found, and give your
recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings form.
9. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that do not apply in the modules evaluated.
Standard / Criterion Items YES NO
Factor I. Physical Attributes

1. Cover elements are correct and complete.


● Grade Level Identifier
● DepEd Logo
● Learning Area
● Quarter Number / Module Number
● Title
● Cover Art
2. All the following necessary elements in the SLM are complete.
● Preliminary Pages
o Title Page
o Copyright Page
Introduction
o
● Body o o Overview
o o o Presentation
● Refere Application
● Answer Generalization /
KeySynthesis Post
Assessment nces

Factor II. Format


1. Headings has consistent heading styles (i.e., main heads, subheads,
sections, and subsections).

2. The size of letters in each page is appropriate for the target user.

3. Font styles in each page are appropriate for the target user.

7
4. Each page observe proper spacing between letters, words, and
paragraphs

5. The pages observe appropriate balance of illustrations and texts.

Factor III. Visuals


Note: Visuals refer to line drawings, photographs, maps, tables, graphs, etc. in the SLM.

1. The visuals used are simple, relevant, and easily recognizable.

2. The visuals are proportionately drawn in size, appropriately placed in the


page, and use appropriate color when needed.

3. The visuals are properly labelled / captioned.

4. Visuals are consistently clear in content and detail.

5. The visuals of a process involving separate steps or actions are consistent


and have individual pictures or frames.

Prepared by:

Evaluator 1: ALMA L. CARBONILLA, EdD Signature:


Evaluator 2: KIMBERLY CLER G. SUAREZ Signature:
Evaluator 3: MOHAMAR D. RINDO Signature:
Evaluator 4: RYAN G. TULOD Signature:

Date Accomplished: July 13, 2021

Summary of Findings
for DepEd-developed Self-Learning Modules (SLMs)

Learning Area: ____ Grade Level: Quarter No.:_____________

8
Title of SLMs: _________________________________________________________
Instruction: For all NO answers provided in the respective evaluation tools, indicate in this
template the following: specific modules, paragraphs, and pages where the errors/ deficiencies are
found (1st column), the brief description of the errors/deficiencies observed ( 2nd column), the type
of error (3rd column), and the specific recommendations to improve the identified error / deficiency
(4th column). Additional rows may be added as necessary.

Module
Number / Type of Error
Page number (Write C for
Brief Description of Errors/ Findings/ Content, L for Specific Recommendations to Improving
Paragraph /
Observations Language, or Identified Error / Deficiency
Line / (in F for Layout/
chronological Format)
order)

9
10

Please affix your signature(s) below:

I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendations are my/our own and have been
made without any undue influence from others:

Evaluator(s):

ALMA L. CARBONILA, EdD


(Signature over printed name) Signature

KIMBERLY CLER G. SUAREZ


(Signature over printed name) Signature

MOHAMAR D. RINDO
(Signature over printed name) Signature

RYAN G.TULOD
(Signature over printed name) Signature

11
Date Accomplished: JULY 13, 2021

12

You might also like