SOX
SOX
SOX
History
After Enron entered bankruptcy in 2001 and cost thousands of
investors millions of dollars, the government moved to ensure
investors would be given accurate information to make informed
decisions. Signed by President George W. Bush in July of 2002,
the bill passed the Senate with a vote of 99 to 0 and the House
423 to 3. Titled the Public Company Acco unting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002, the act is more commonly known
as Sarbanes-Oxley for the sponsors of the act--Sen. Paul Sarbanes
and Rep. Michael G. Oxley.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act came into force in July 2002 and
introduced major changes to the regulation of corporate
governance and financial practice. It is named after Senator Paul
Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley, who were its main
architects, and it set a number of non-negotiable deadlines for
compliance.
This section is listed under Title III of the act, and pertains to
'Corporate Responsibility for Financial Reports'.
This section is listed within Title VIII of the act (Corporate and
Criminal Fraud Accountability), and pertains to 'Criminal Penalties
for Altering Documents'.
Sarbanes-Oxley Planning
Having studied the other pages on this website, even if you are
considering using an external consultant or legal expert to help, it
is well worth taking a few basic steps to enhance your position
immediately. This not only demonstrates due diligence, but may
well reduce the overall consultancy costs themselves. Self-
compliance however, will almost certainly be the most common
aproach, in which case it is important to ensure that nothing is
left to chance.
One area that falls into the self-help category is perhaps security.
In many respects security underpins some of the requirements of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It is therefore important to quickly
establish a credible and detailed security policy, which can often
be done readily via off the shelf packages.
Section 906
Features
Along with the required written statements issued by executive
officers, Section 906 details possible criminal penalties.
Executives who submit reports not in compliance with the act are
able to be fined up to $1 million or imprisoned for not more than
10 years, or both. Executives who willfully submit such
statements are subject to possible fines up to $5 million and
imprisonment of no more than 20 years, or both.
Significance
By requiring written statements corroborating the financial
reporting, the law places accountability for these disclosures on
the shoulders of the executives.