0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views6 pages

MIT8 701f20 Rec2 Soln

Uploaded by

Neha Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views6 pages

MIT8 701f20 Rec2 Soln

Uploaded by

Neha Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Department of Physics
Course: 8.701 – Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Term: Fall 2020
Instructor: Markus Klute
TA : Tianyu Justin Yang

Discussion Problems
from recitation on September 8rd, 2020

Problem 1: Cosmic rays


Greisen, Zatespin, and Kuzmin (GZK) predicted that there is a maximum energy
for which any cosmic ray (which are predominantly protons) will be observed. Their
argument was that if energetic enough, cosmic rays will lose energy via the process
pγCM B → pπ 0 , where γCM B is a cosmic microwave background photon, whose energies
are ECM B ≈ 3 × 10−4 eV. Therefore, the threshold energy for which this process can
occur sets the maximum expected energy a cosmic ray should be observed to have
(called the GZK cutoff). Calculate the GZK cutoff energy in eV, and compare your
result to the observed cosmic ray energy spectrum (see Fig. 29.8 of the PDG review
on Cosmic Rays or below). [Hint: You can take the energy to be much larger than
the proton mass and assume that the frame in which we want to know this energy is
the one where the proton and CMB photon collide head on.]

1
© Regents of the University of California. All
rights reserved. This content is excluded from our
Creative Commons license. For more information,
see https://ocw.mit.edu/fairuse.

2
Problem 2: Mandelstam variables
Consider the reaction between two particles with 4-momenta pµ1 and p2µ . The outgoing
particles have 4-momenta pµ3 and pµ4 . Discuss the variables s, t, and u for the center-
of-mass frame and a fixed-target frame where the second particle is at rest. Assume
that the masses involved are much smaller than the energies (mi  Ei ).


Kinematic in center-of-mass frame:

p~∗1 + p~2∗ = p~3∗ + p~4∗ = 0


(1)
E1∗ + E2∗ = E3∗ + E4∗

Kinematic in fixed-target frame:

p~2 = 0
p~1 = p~3 + p~4 (2)
E1 + m2 = E3 + E4

Assuming that m1 , m2  E1 , i.e. small masses relative to the energies of the


scattering process:

E ≈ |p~|
E1∗ ≈ E2∗ ≈ E3∗ ≈ E4∗

For s and t:

3
  
E1 m2
s= (pµ1 + pµ2 )2 = 2 pµ1 p2 µ + m12 + m22 ≈2 ~0 = 2 m2 E1
p~1
| {z }
Fixed-target frame
2
E1∗ + E1∗

= = 4 E1∗ 2
p~1∗ − p~1∗
| {z }
Center-of-mass frame

2
t = (pµ1 ∗ − pµ3 ∗ ) = −2 pµ1 ∗ p∗3 µ + m21 + m32
 ∗  ∗ 
E1 E3
≈ −2 ∗
p~1 p~3∗
   
∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
= −2 E1 E3 − p~1 p~3 = −2 E1 E3 − |p~1 | |p~3 | cos θ
  s 
= 2 E12 ∗ cos θ∗ − 1 = cos θ∗ − 1
2

 2  2
E1 − E 3 E4 − m 2
t= (p1µ − p3µ )2 = =
p~1 − p~3 p~4
= E42 − p~24 + m22 − 2 m2 E4 ≈ −2 m2 E4
 
= −2 m2 E1 + m2 − E3
 
= 2 m 2 E3 − E1

Note the range of values for t: −∞ < t ≤ 0. For u and s + t + u:

4
2
u = (pµ1 ∗ − pµ4 ∗ ) = −2 pµ1 ∗ p∗4 µ + m21 + m42
 ∗  ∗ 
E1 E4
≈ −2
p~∗1 p~4∗
   
∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
= −2 E1 E4 − p~1 p~4 = −2 E1 E4 − |p~1 | |p~4 | cos (π + θ )
  s 
= −2 E12 ∗ cos θ∗ + 1 = − cos θ∗ + 1
2

 2  2
E1 − E 4 E3 − m2
u= (p1µ − p4µ )2 = =
p~1 − p~4 p~3
= E32 − p~23 + m22 − 2 m2 E3 ≈ −2 m2 E3

 2  2  2
s + t + u = pµ1 + pµ2 + pµ1 − pµ3 + pµ1 − pµ4
4
X    X4
= m2i + 2 p1 µ pµ1 + pµ2 − p3µ + pµ4 = m2i
i=1 | {z } i=1
≡0

5
MIT OpenCourseWare
https://ocw.mit.edu

8.701 Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics


Fall 2020

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: https://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

You might also like