Chapter 7 Busscom
Chapter 7 Busscom
Learning Objectives
The investment in subsidiary is initially measured equal to the value assigned to the
consideration transferred at the acquisition date and subsequently measured either:
a. at cost;
In all of the previous illustrations, the investment in subsidiary is measured at cost. In this
section, we will illustrate the consolidation procedures when the investment in subsidiary is
measured at fair value (PFRS 9) and using the equity method.
On January 1, 20x1, ABC acquired 80% interest in XYZ, Inc. for P175,000.
XYZ's net identifiable assets have a carrying amount of P74,000 and fair value of
P90,000. The difference is due to the following:
____________________________________________________________________________
Carrying Fair Fair value
________________________ amount value adjustment (FVA)________
Solutions:
______________________________________________________________________________
Total 93,000
Subsidiary's net assets at fair value - Dec 31, 20x1 (see Step 2) 104,000
Parent's share in the net change in subsidiary's net assets (4) 11,200
(d) Net change in XYZ's net assets (Step 2) 14,000 x 80% = 11,200
ASSETS
On January 1, 20x1, ABC acquired 80% interest in XYZ, Inc. for P75,000
XYZ's net identifiable assets have a carrying amount of P74,000 and fair value of
P90,000. The difference is due to the following:
Requirement: Prepare a summary of the December 31, 20x1 consolidated financial statements.
Solutions:
Under the equity method, the investment is initially recognized at cost and subsequently adjusted
for changes in the equity of the investee and depreciation of any undervaluation or overvaluation
in the identifiable assets and liabilities of the investee. Dividends received from the investee are
not recognized as income but as deduction to the carrying amount of the investment.
Investment subsidiary
Initial cost 75,000
Sh. in profit of XYZ, Inc. 16,000 -Dividends received share in the
amortization of undervaluation of
4,800 assets
______________________________________________________________________________
Share in amortization of
undervaluation of assets 4,800
_11,200_
XYZ's net assets at fair value - Dec. 31, 20x1 (Step 2) 104,000
Parent's share in the net change in subsidiary's net assets (d) 11,200
Any dividends received from the subsidiary are added back because under the equity method,
dividends are not recognized as income (i.e., not recognized in retained earnings) but rather as
deduction to the carrying amount of the investment. The consolidation journal entry is as
follows:
Note: If the investment in subsidiary is measured under the equity method, the consolidated
retained earnings is equal to the parent's retained earnings. This is because, under the equity
method, the investor recognizes its share in the subsequent changes in the investee's net assets
and any fair value adjustments directly in its financial statements.
Step 6: Consolidated profit or loss
ASSETS
Regardless of the measurement basis used for the investment in subsidiary, the consolidated
accounts result to same amounts. This is because the investment in subsidiary and the effects of
its measurement basis are eliminated. Compare Illustration 1 (measurement at fair value) with
Illustration 2 (measurement using equity method) and Illustration 1: Consolidation - Subsequent
to date of acquisition' in Chapter 4 (measurement at cost).
In a simple group (horizontal group) structure, a parent has one or more subsidiaries through
direct holdings only. However, in practice, this is not always the case. Related entities may have
overlapping interests in each other, such as in the case of a complex group structure
A complex group structure arises when the parent obtains control over another entity indirectly
through its direct holdings over another entity. A complex group structure may be described as
either (a) vertical group or (b) D-shaped (mixed) group.
a. Vertical group - the parent's subsidiary has its own subsidiary (sometimes referred to as 'sub-
subsidiary').
Vertical group
P
80%
S1
60%
S2
If control is based solely on shareholdings, P's control does not extend only to S1 but also to S2
(the 'sub-subsidiary). Since P controls S1, S1 cannot exercise control over S2 without the
intervention of P. Therefore, the vertical group's consolidated financial statements shall include
all of the three entities.
Note: You might think that S2 is not a subsidiary of P because P only indirectly holds 48% (80%
x 60%) of S2. This view, however, is incorrect. P controls S1, S1 controls S2; therefore, P
controls S2
b. D-shaped (Mixed) group - the parent has a direct controlling interest in at least one subsidiary,
and in addition, both the parent and the subsidiary together hold a controlling interest in another
entity.
P
80%
25%
S1
30%
S2
If control is based solely on shareholdings, P controls 51 through its direct holdings of 80%. This
makes S1 a subsidiary of P. In addition, both P and S1 own a controlling interest in S2, i.e., 25%
+ 30% = 55%. This makes S2 a subsidiary of P Group.
P controls S1. Therefore, P controls S1's 30% interest in S2. This 30% indirect holdings
plus P's 25% direct holdings are presumed to result to control of P over S2. Therefore, the mixed
group's consolidated financial statements shall include all of the three entities.
The acquisition date is the date the acquirer obtains control of the acquiree. For a "sub-
subsidiary," it is the date the sub-subsidiary becomes a member of the parent group. This may
precede, coincide with or follow the acquisition of the parent's or subsidiary's direct holdings
over the sub-subsidiary.
Goodwill from each subsidiary and sub-subsidiary are computed separately on their respective
acquisition dates. Their pre-acquisition and post-acquisition reserves are also calculated from
these dates.
Scenario #1:
On January 1, 20x1, Si acquires 60% interest in S2. On January 1, 20x3, P acquires 80%
interest in S1.
Since S1 already holds controlling interest in S2 when P acquired S1, the acquisition date for
both S1 and S2 is on January 1, 20x3.
Goodwill from each of S1 and 52 are computed on this date. Also, the pre-acquisition and
post-acquisition reserves of each of S1 and S2 are computed from this date.
Scenario #2:
On January 1, 20x1, P acquires 80% interest in Si. On January 1, 20x3, S1 acquires 60%
interest in S2.
Since S1 acquires S2 only after P acquired $1, the acquisition dates are: (a) January 1, 20x1 for
S1 and (b) January 1, 20x3 for S2.
Scenario #1:
Scenario #2:
The acquisition date for both S1 and 52 is on January 1, 20x4, the date when P holds controlling
interest in S1 and also the date when P and S1 together hold a controlling interest in S2. S2 is an
associate of P in 20x2 and 20x3.
A parent entity is required to consolidate all entities it controls, whether through direct or indirect
holdings. Therefore, the parent shall consolidate both the subsidiary and the 'sub-subsidiary. The
consolidation procedures for a vertical group differ from those of a simple group only on the
computations of goodwill and NCI.
In the previous example where P owns 80% of S1 and S1 owns 60% of S2, there are two
separate groups:
1. The S1 Group - whereby S1 shall prepare consolidated financial statements to include S2, its
own subsidiary; and
2. The P Group - whereby P shall prepare consolidated financial statements to include both S1
and S2.
Therefore, two sets of consolidated financial statements are prepared, one by S1 for the
S1 Group and one by P for the P Group, unless the limited exemptions under PFRS 10 apply.
P acquired 80% interest in S1 for P100,000. Sl's net identifiable assets were P110,000.
The NCI in Si has a fair value of P25,000.
S1 acquired 60% interest in S2 for P50,000. S2's net identifiable assets were P60,000.
The NCI in S2 (direct and indirect) has a fair value of P40,000.
The carrying amounts of Si's and S2's net identifiable assets approximate fair values.
_ P S1 S2
Solutions:
Ownership over S1
Total 100%
Ownership over S2
Total 100%
NCI in S2 52%
______________________________________________________
_ S1 S2
FVA
_________________________________________S1 S2 Total
An indirect holding adjustment is made because the consideration transferred to S2 is not wholly
made by P but rather partly by P (80%) and partly by S1 (20%). Only the portion effectively
transferred by P (P50,000 x 80% = P40,000) enters into the computation of goodwill. The
indirect holding adjustment is computed as follows:
The indirect holding adjustment affects both the computations of goodwill and NCI.
Since the NCI's are measured at fair value, there must be goodwill attributable to the
NCI's. These are computed as follows:
_ S1 S2
_ S1 S2 Total
A Notice that the only difference in the goodwill and NCI computations between a simple
group structure and a complex group structure is the indirect holding adjustment
Parent's share in the net change in Si's net assets (a) 17,600
Parent's share in the net change in S2's net assets (b) 8,640
Depreciation of FVA -
Depreciation of FVA - - - -
_ 113,000
Retained earnings S1 S2
The carrying amounts of the net identifiable assets of S1 and S2 approximate their fair
values at acquisition dates.
_ P S1 S2
There have been no changes in the share capital accounts of S1 and S2 during the year.
The goodwill from S1 has been impaired by P10,000.
Solutions:
Ownership over S1
Total 100%
Ownership over S2
Direct holdings of P in S2 0%
Total 100%
The acquisition dates of the subsidiaries are January 1, 20x1 for S1 and December 31, 20x1 for
S2. Goodwill and NCI on each of S1 and S2 are computed separately on their respective
acquisition dates. Their pre-acquisition and post-acquisition reserves are also calculated from
these dates.
_ S1 S2
FVA
_ S1 S2
The fair values of the NCI’s are determined on the subsidiaries' respective acquisition
dates (i.e., Jan. 1, 20x1 for S1 and Dec. 31, 20x1 for S2).
_ S1 S2 Total
Parent's share in the net change in S1's net assets (a) 17,600
Depreciation of FVA -
None of S2's profit is included in the 20x1 consolidated financial statements because S2
was acquired only on December 31, 20x1.
Depreciation of FVA
The consolidation procedures for a D-shaped group are similar to a vertical group. However, in a
D-shaped group, the parent holds both a direct and an indirect interest in a 'sub-subsidiary'.
P acquired 64,000 shares in S1 for P100,000 and 12,500 shares in S2 for P40,000.
S1 acquired 15,000 shares in S2 for P50,000.
Si's and S2's net identifiable assets have carrying amounts of P110,000 and P60,000,
respectively. The carrying amounts approximate fair values.
The NCIS are measured at fair values of P25,000 for S1 and P40,000 for S2.
P S1 S2
Solutions:
Step 1: Analysis of group structure
Ownership over S1
Total 100%
Ownership over S2
Total 100%
NCI in S2 51%
_ S1 S2
FVA
_ S1 S2
_ S1 S2 Total
Depreciation of FVA
_ 120,000
Investments in associates are accounted for under the equity method which is often times
referred to as one-line consolidation. The next illustration illustrates the consolidation procedures
when the group has investments in associates.
Illustration:
_ B C D E
The carrying amounts of the net identifiable assets of each of the investees approximate their fair
values on January 1, 20x1. There have been no changes in the share capital accounts of the
entities during the year.
A summary of the individual financial statements of the entities on December 31, 20x1 is shown
below:
_ A B C D E
The investment accounts pertain solely to the investment transactions described earlier and are
not adjusted for any investment income from investees.
Statements of profit or loss
_ A B C D E
Requirements:
a. Assuming the existence of control is based solely on shareholdings, which of the entities
above are considered subsidiaries of A Co.?
Solutions:
20%
25% B E
C 30%
40%
D
Requirement (a):
A, B and C belong to a D-shaped (mixed) group structure. Therefore, B and C are subsidiaries of
A.
Although A controls B, A does not control E because B only has a significant influence
over E. The same is true in the case of D.
Therefore, only B and C are accounted for under the 'acquisition method.' D and E are
accounted for under the equity method!'
Ownership over B
Total 100%
Ownership over C
Total 100%
_ B C
_ B C
_ B C Total
_ B C
B C
FVA
_ B C
Consideration transferred (given) & (40,000 + 50,000) 100,000 90,000
_ A B Total
Parent's share in the net change in B's net assets (a) 19,512
Parent's share in the net change in C's net assets (b) 10,388
Depreciation of FVA
Push-down accounting
In the previous illustrations, we assigned the fair value adjustments (FVA) to the subsidiary's net
identifiable assets through consolidation computations (or consolidation journal entries) which
are not recorded in the separate books of either the subsidiary or the parent.
However, if the subsidiary has outstanding public debt or preference shares, the U.S. SEC
encourages, but does not require, The use of push down accounting. (U.S. sec Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 54)
It should be noted though that the PFRSs do not address push-down accounting. Neither
does the Philippine SEC require the use of the push-down accounting. This section only attempts
to illustrate how push-down accounting works.
Proponents' view
Proponents of push-down accounting argue that a substantial change in ownership creates a new
basis of accounting for the subsidiary's assets and liabilities.
Since the subsidiary's financial statements are viewed as extension of the parent's
statements (parent company theory), the basis of accounting for the subsidiary's net identifiable
assets should parallel the parent's accounting basis for newly purchased assets and liabilities, i.e.,
at fair values. Therefore, the acquisition- date fair values of the subsidiary's net identifiable assets
should be "pushed-down" to the subsidiary's separate financial statements.
Oppositions' view
Those who oppose push-down accounting argue that a new basis of accounting should not arise
irrespective of the ownership change in a subsidiary
Since the subsidiary's financial statements are viewed as a distinct part of a group (entity theory),
the subsidiary should still retain its previous accounting basis for its net identifiable assets (e.g.,
amortized cost for receivables, lower of cost or NRV for inventories, cost model or revaluation
model for PPE, etc.) in its separate financial statements.
Moreover, many believe that since the subsidiary did not actually sell anything (i.e., the
parent purchases its controlling interest from the subsidiary's former owners and not from the
subsidiary itself), a new basis of accounting should not arise.
Thus, the acquisition-date fair value adjustments should be reflected only in the
consolidated financial statements but not in the subsidiary's separate financial statements in order
to give readers information on the effect of the business combination.
On January 1, 20x1, ABC Co. acquired 80% interest in XYZ, Inc, by issuing 5,000 shares with
fair value of P15 per share and par value of P10 per share. The individual financial statements
immediately before the acquisition are shown below:
The carrying amounts of XYZ's net identifiable assets approximate their fair values except for
the following:
Solutions:
Tota 93,000
Fair value of net assets acquired (P50K + P24K + P16K FVA) (90,000)
Goodwill 3,000
1, Inventory 8,000
The entry above is not a CJE but rather a regular entry that is recorded in the separate books of
XYZ.
Under push-down accounting, the subsidiary is viewed as a new entity. Accordingly, the pre-
acquisition retained earnings are eliminated and the accounts are remeasured at acquisition-date
fair values.
The individual financial statements after recording the entries above are shown below:
Goodwill 3,000
d. The balancing figure after performing (a) to (c) is recorded in the "push-down capital"
account.
As mentioned earlier, push-down accounting simplifies the consolidation process because the
consolidation journal entries mainly involve only the elimination of the investment in subsidiary
and effects of intercompany transactions, if any. No depreciation of FVA is made because the
subsidiary's net identifiable assets are already restated to acquisition-date fair values.
Just like in normal consolidation procedures, the CJE above is also not recorded in the
separate books but rather used only for consolidation purposes.
ASSETS
Equipment 228,000
Goodwill 3,000
Whether or not the push-down accounting is used, the consolidated accounts should
result to the same amounts,
No intercompany transactions occurred during 20x1. Goodwill is not impaired. The December
31, 20x1 individual financial statements show the following information:
Goodwill 3,000
ABC's share in the net change in XYZ's net assets (110,000 x 80%).
NCI's share in the net change in XYZ's net assets (P10,000 x 20%).
ASSETS
Goodwill 3,000
Chapter 7: Summary
The consolidation procedures for a complex group structure are similar to those of a
simple structure except for the computations of goodwill and NCI. These
computations are affected by the indirect holding adjustment
An indirect holding adjustment is made because the consideration transferred to the
"sub-subsidiary" is partly made by the parent and partly by the direct subsidiary. Only
the portion made by the parent enters into the computation of goodwill.
PROBLEMS:
Owen Sharp
In Owen's December 31, 1993, consolidated balance sheet, what amount should be reported as
total retained earnings?
a. 1,240,000 c. 1,380,000
b. 1,360,000 d. 1,800,000
(Adapted)
On January 1, 1991, Dallas, Inc. acquired 80% of Style, Inc.'s outstanding common stock. On
that date, the carrying amounts of Style’s assets and liabilities approximated their fair values.
Non- controlling interest was measured using the proportionate share method.
During 1991, Style paid P5,000 cash dividends to its stockholders. Summarized balance sheet
information for the two companies follows:
Dallas Style
2. What amount should Dallas report as earnings from subsidiary, in its 1991 income statement?
a. 12,000 c. 16,000
b. 15,000 d. 20,000
(Adapted)
a. 120,000 c. 150,000
b. 132,000 d. 160,000
a. 20,000 c. 32,000
b. 22,000 d. 40,000
5. How much is the non-controlling interest in the net assets of Style on December 31, 1991?
a. 20,000 c. 26,000
a. 190,750 c. 51,000
b. 139,750 d. 36,000
7. How much is the total assets in the consolidated statement of financial position as of
December 31, 1991?
a. 293,000 c. 270,000
b. 280,000 d. 253,000
8. What amount of equity attributable to the owners of the parent should be reported in Dallas'
December 31, 1991, consolidated balance sheet?
a. 270,000 c. 293,000
b. 286,000 d. 385,000
1. Penn, Inc., a manufacturing company, owns 75% of the common stock of Sell, Inc., an
investment company. Sell owns 60% of the common stock of Vane, Inc., an insurance company.
In Penn's consolidated financial statements, should consolidation accounting or equity method
accounting be used for Sell and Vane?
a. Consolidation used for Sell and equity method used for Vane.
c Equity method used for Sell and consolidation used for Vane.
(Adapted)
Scenario #1:
2. On January 1, 20x1, S1 acquires 60% interest in S2. On January 1, 20x3, P acquires 80%
interest in S1. What is the acquisition date?
e. a and b
Scenario #2:
4. On January 1, 20x1, P acquires 80% interest is S1. On January 1, 20x3, S1 acquires 60%
interest in S2. What is the acquisition date?
e. a and b
Scenario #1:
d. a and c
e. a and b
Scenario #2:
d. a and c
e. a and b
P acquired 80% interest in S1 for P400,000 when the retained earnings of S1 were
P120,000. NCI in S1 has a fair value of P100,000
Si acquired 60% interest in S2 for P200,000 when the retained earnings of S2 were
P40,000. NCI in S2 (direct and indirect) has a fair value of P160,000.
The carrying amounts of the net identifiable assets of S1 and S2 approximate their fair values on
January 1, 20x1. The group determined on December 31, 20x1 that goodwill has been impaired
by 20%. There have been no changes in the share capitals of S1 and S2 during the year.
_ P S1 S2
8. How much is the total NCI in net assets as of December 31, 20x1?
11. How much is the profit attributable to owners of parent and to NCI, respectively?
12. How much is the consolidated total assets as of December 31, 20x1?
13. How much is the consolidated total equity as of December 31, 20x1?
Retained earnings S1 S2
A summary of the individual statement of financial position of the entities as at December 31,
20x1 is shown below:
_ P S1 S2
The carrying amounts of the net identifiable assets of S1 and S2 approximate their fair values at
their acquisition dates. The group determined that the goodwill to Si has been impaired by
P40,000 as at December 31, 20x1. There have been no changes in the share capitals of S1 and S2
during the year.
15. How much is the total NCI in net assets as of December 31, 20x1?
16. How much is the consolidated retained earnings as of December 31, 20x1?
18. How much are the profit attributable to owners of parent and to the NCIS?
a. 348,200 b. 358,400 c. 407,680 d. 407,930
19. How much is the consolidated total assets as of December 31. 20x1?
20. How much is the consolidated total equity as of December 31, 20x1?
P acquired 64,000 shares in S1 for P400,000 and 12,500 shares in S2 for P160,000
S1 acquired 15,000 shares in S2 for P200,000.
Additional information:
_ S1 S2
The carrying amounts of the net identifiable assets of S1 and S2 approximate their fair values on
January 1, 20x1. The group determined on December 31, 20x1 that there is no impairment of
goodwill. There have been no changes in the share capitals of S1 and S2 during the year.
A summary of the individual financial statements of the entities on December 31, 20x1 is shown
below:
_ P S1 S2
22. How much is the total NCI in net assets as of December 31, 20x1?
23. How much is the consolidated retained earnings as of December 31, 20x1?
25. How much are the profit attributable to owners of parent and to the NCIS?
26. How much is the consolidated total assets as of December 31, 20x1?
27. How much is the consolidated total equity as of December 31, 20x1?
Additional information:
_ B C D E
The carrying amounts of the net identifiable assets of each of the investees approximate their fair
values on January 1, 20x1. The group determined on December 31, 20x1 that there is no
impairment in goodwill. There have been no changes in the share capitals of S1 and S2 during
the year.
A summary of the individual financial statements of the entities on December 31, 20x1 is shown
below:
_ A B C D E
Retained
Total
and equity
The investment accounts pertain solely to the investment transactions described earlier and are
not adjusted for any investment income from investees.
_ A B C D E
30. How much is the total NCI in net assets as of December 31, 20x1?
31. How much is the consolidated retained earnings as of December 31, 20x1?
33. How much are the profit attributable to owners of parent and to the NCIS?
34. How much is the consolidated total assets as of December 31, 20x1?
35. How much is the consolidated total equity as of December 31, 20x1?