Topic 2: Moral Versus Non-Moral Standards Nominal Duration: 1.5 Hours Learning Outcomes
Topic 2: Moral Versus Non-Moral Standards Nominal Duration: 1.5 Hours Learning Outcomes
Topic 2: Moral Versus Non-Moral Standards Nominal Duration: 1.5 Hours Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes:
Upon completion of this topic, the student must be able to:
1. differentiate Moral from Non-moral standards;
2. cite the metaphors for moral standards; and
3. explain the characteristics of moral standards.
Introduction
What moral standards do? First, they promote human welfare or well-being;
second, they promote the “good” (animals, environment, and future generations); and
third, they prescribe what humans ought to do in terms of a.) Rights (responsibilities to
society); and b.) Obligations (specific values/virtues).
Some individuals may have heard the term “Amoral” (n.d). What makes this word
different from the descriptions above? It means not influenced by right and wrong. If a
person who is immoral acts against his conscience, a person who is amoral does not
have a conscience to act against in the first place. Infants could be said to be amoral
since they have not yet developed a mature mind to understand right and wrong. Some
extreme sociopaths are also amoral, since they lack a conscience as a result of a
cognitive disorder. In other words, an immoral person has a sense of right and wrong
but fails to live up to those moral standards. An amoral person has no sense of right and
wrong and does not recognize any moral standard.
Another word that needs clarification is the adjective “Unmoral” (n.d.). It refers to
something to which right and wrong are not applicable, such as animals, forces of
nature, and machines. For example, Typhoons cause damages to properties and loss of
lives but they are unmoral, since they are formed by unconscious natural processes that
exist outside the bounds of morality. When talking about non-moral agents, such as
animals or weather patterns, we use unmoral.
“Moral norms” (n.d.) have different forms. They can be expressed as principles,
dispositions, character traits, and even through the life of a person. These are different
ways of specifying criteria for moral judgments.
1. Carpenter’s Square
Moral norms are like a carpenter’s square used to measure human freedom and
construct morally good character and right actions. Moral norms are standards or
criteria for judging and acting. Its purpose is first, to provide moral standards, criteria, or
measures for judging; and second is to guide one’s conscience in making moral
judgments.
3. Overriding
They should be preferred to other values including self-interest. If a person has a
moral obligation to do something, then the person ought to do that even if this conflicts
with other non-moral values or self-interest. At work, for instance, moral values of
honesty and respect for lives come first rather than compromising them for keeping a
well-paid job.