Scribd
Upload
38 views

Water Plant Energy Management

Electrical load management strategies can significantly reduce operating costs for water and wastewater treatment plants. Facilities should investigate the rate schedules offered by their electric utility and select one that matches their usage patterns. Demand charges can be lowered by shifting large loads to off-peak periods through improved efficiency, load scheduling, and use of storage. Simple changes like these were demonstrated to save facilities $50,000 to $320,000 per year in reduced demand charges.

Uploaded by

Mark Massa
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
38 views

Water Plant Energy Management

Electrical load management strategies can significantly reduce operating costs for water and wastewater treatment plants. Facilities should investigate the rate schedules offered by their electric utility and select one that matches their usage patterns. Demand charges can be lowered by shifting large loads to off-peak periods through improved efficiency, load scheduling, and use of storage. Simple changes like these were demonstrated to save facilities $50,000 to $320,000 per year in reduced demand charges.

Uploaded by

Mark Massa
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

ELECTRICAL LOAD MANAGEMENT

Electrical energy consumption at water and wastewater


treatment plants is increasing because of more stringent
regulation and customer concerns about water quality. As a
result, more facility managers are turning to energy
management to reduce operating costs. Reducing energy
consumption, however, is only part of the equation.
Electricity is typically billed in two ways: by the quantity of
energy used over a period of time, measured in kilowatt-
hours; and by demand, the rate of flow of energy, measured
in kilowatts. By choosing when and where to use electricity, facilities can often save as much (or
more) money as they could by reducing energy consumption.

RATE SCHEDULES
Because it is costly for electric utilities to provide generating capacity for use during periods of
peak electrical demand, they often structure rates to encourage customers to minimize demand
during peak periods. That's why plants should investigate the variety of rate schedules offered by
electric utilities. They may achieve substantial savings simply by selecting a rate schedule that
better fits their pattern of electricity use.

• Time-of-Use Rates
In most areas of the country time-of-use rates, which favor off-peak electrical use, are available.
Under time-of-use rates, energy and demand charges vary during different block periods of the
day. For example, energy charges in the summer may be only five cents per kilowatt-hour with
no demand charge between 9:30 p.m. and 8:30 a.m., but increase to nine cents per kilowatt-hour
with a demand charge of $10 per kilowatt between noon and 6:00 p.m. The monthly demand
charge is often based upon the highest 15-minute average demand for the month.

• Interruptible Rates
Interruptible rates offer users discounts in exchange for a user commitment to reduce demand on
request. On the rare occasions when a plant receives such a request, it can run standby power
generators.

• Power Factor Charges


Power factor, also known as "reactive power" or "kVAR," reflects the extent that current and
voltage cycle in phase. Low power factor, such as that caused by a partly loaded motor, results in
excessive current flow. Many electric utilities charge extra for low power factor because of the
cost of providing the extra current.

• Future Pricing Options


As the electrical industry is deregulated, many new pricing options will be offered. Real-time
pricing, where pricing varies continuously based on regional demand, and block power, or
electricity priced in low-cost, constant-load increments, are only two of the many rate structures
that may be available. Facilities that know how and when they use energy and have identified
flexible electric loads can select a rate structure that offers the highest economy, while meeting
their energy needs.

DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

• Conduct an Energy Survey


The first step to an effective energy management program for your facility is to learn how and
when each piece of equipment uses energy. Calculate the demand and monthly energy
consumption for the largest motors in your plant. Staff may be surprised at the results—a 100
horsepower motor may cost over $4,500 per month if run continuously.
The rate at which energy is used will vary throughout the day, depending upon factors such as
the demand from the distribution system and reservoir and well levels for water systems or
influent flows and biological oxygen demand loading for wastewater systems. Plot daily
electrical load as a function of time for different plant loading conditions and note which large
equipment can be operated off-peak. Examine all available rate schedules to determine which
can provide the lowest cost in conjunction with appropriate operational changes.

• Reduce Peak Demand


Look for opportunities to improve the efficiency of equipment that must run during the peak
period, such as improving pump efficiency or upgrading a wastewater plant's aeration system.
During on-peak periods, avoid using large equipment simultaneously: two 25-kilowatt pumps
that run only two hours each day can contribute 50-kilowatts to the demand if run at the same
time.

• Shift Load to Off-Peak


Many large loads can be scheduled for off-peak operation. For example, plants can use system
storage to ride out periods of highest load rather than operating pumps. Avoid running large
intermittent pumps when operating the main pumps.

• Improve Power Factor


Low power factor is frequently caused by motors that run less than fully loaded. This also wastes
energy because motor efficiency drops off below full load. Examine motor systems to determine
if the motor should be resized or if a smaller motor can be added to handle lower loads. Power
factor can also be corrected by installing a capacitor in parallel with the offending equipment.

DEMONSTRATED SUCCESS
Encina Wastewater Authority reduced its demand charges $50,000 per year by manually shutting
down select high-demand equipment on-peak. Moulton Niguel Water District eliminated on-
peak pumping at several large pumping stations by utilizing gravity flow from storage reservoirs,
reducing demand charges by $320,000 per year. The City of Woodland Water Department
reduced its energy costs $125,000 per year simply by changing to a time-of-use rate schedule and
modifying operating practices to lower its peak demand.

REFERENCES
Electric Power Research Institute, Reduce Costs by Understanding Your Electric Bill, BR-
103303, 1993.
Electric Power Research Institute, Energy Efficiency in Wastewater Treatment,
TechCommentary Vol.1, No. 3, May 1993.

You might also like