Lesson 5. A World of Regions
Lesson 5. A World of Regions
Lesson 5. A World of Regions
A WORLD OF REGIONS
Learning outcomes:
At the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
* Differentiate between regionalism and globalization;
* Explain how regions are formed and kept together;
* Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of regionalism; and
* Identify the factors leading to greater integration of the Asian region.
- Governments, associations, societies, and groups form regional organizations and networks as
a way of coping with the challenges of globalization.
- Globalization has made people aware of the world in general, but it has also made Filipinos
more aware of specific areas such as Southeast Asia.
Regionalism
- Is seen as a political and economic phenomenon.
- The term regionalism is actually encompassed a broader area. It can be examined in
relation to the following;
* Identities * Ecological sustainability; and
* Ethics, * Health
* Religion,
- It is a process and must be treated as an emergent, socially constituted phenomenon.
- It means that regions are not natural or given. Instead, they are constructed and
defined by policymakers, economic actors, and even social movements.
Regionalization
- Refers to the regional concentration of economic flows (capital, goods and people)
within a specific geographical area.
- it develops from the bottom up through societally driven processes coming from
markets, private trade, and investment flows, none of which is strictly
controlled by governments (bottom-up process).
- Growth of societal integration within the region and to the often-undirected processes
of social and economic interaction.
Regionalism
- Refers to a political process characterized by economic policy cooperation and
coordination among countries.
- Political will to create a formal arrangement among states on a geographically
restricted basis (top-down process).
Non-State Regionalism
- They rely on the power of individuals, non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
and associations to link up with one another in pursuit of a particular goal.
- New regionalism varies informs:
* Tiny associations that include more than a few actors and focus on a single
issue; or
* Huge continental unions that address a multitude of common problems from
territorial defense to food security.
- New Regionalism - Is identified with reformists who share the same
* Values;
* Norms;
* Institutions, and
* System
that exist outside of the traditional, established mainstream institutions
and systems.
- Some organizations partner with governments to initiate social change. Those
who work with governments (legitimizers) participate in “institutional
mechanisms that afford some civil society groups voice and influence in
technocratic policy-making processes.”
- Example: The ASEAN issued its Human Rights Declaration in 2009. Aware that
democratic rights are limited in many ASEAN countries (regional body left
it to member countries to apply the principles as they see fit).
. . . “New Regionalism (NGO)” organizations used this official declaration
to pressure governments to pass laws and regulations that protect and
promote Human rights.
- South America (left-wing governments) support the:
Hemispheric Social Alliance’s opposition to the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA).
- Members of the Roundtable of National Associations and Networks and NGOs in
Latin America and the Caribbean participate in:
* Forum
* Summits
* Dialogues with Presidents and Ministers
- Citizen Diplomacy Forums - a group tries to influence the policies and program of the
Organization of American States.
- ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) was in part the result of NGOs and
civil society groups pushing the following:
* Prevent discrimination;
* Uphold political freedom; and
* Promote democracy and human rights throughout the region.
- Other regional organizations dedicate themselves to specialized causes:
Rainforest Foundation (Brazil, Guyana, Panama, and Peru)
- Protect indigenous peoples and the rainforests
Regional Interfaith Youth Networks (young Christians across Asia, Africa, Middle
East, America, and Caribbean)
- Promote “conflict prevention, resolution, peace, education and sustainable
development.”
- Migrant Forum in Asia (another regional network of NGOs and trade Union)
- Committed to protecting and promoting the rights and welfare of
migrant workers.
- Those organizations’ primary power relies on their moral standing and their
ability to combine lobbying with pressure politics.
- Disadvantage of non-state organization
- Most of them are poorly financed (unlike with their large state counterpart);
their impact in global politics is, therefore limited.
New regionalism differs significantly from traditional state-to-state regionalism when it comes
to identifying problems.
- New regionalism advocates such as the NGO Global Forum see these issues as
reflections of flawed economic development and environmental models.
- By flawed, they mean economic development plans that are market-based, profit-
driven, and hardly concerned with social welfare, especially among the poor.
- Another challenge for new regionalists is the discord that may emerge among them.
Another challenge for new regionalists is the discord that may emerge among them.
Example disagreement surface over issues like:
* Gender and religion (pro-choice NGOs breaking from religious civil society groups (run
by lay) that side with the Church).
* Muslim imams, or governments opposed to reproductive rights and other pro-women
policies.
Moreover;
* While civil society groups are able to dialogue with governments, the latter may not
be welcoming to this new trend and set up one obstacle after another.
IOM, Migrant Forum Asia Partner to Promote the Rights of Migrant Workers in International
Supply Chains.
Migrant Forum Asia and its ally, the
* Coordination of Action Research on AIDS (CARAM) lobbied ASEAN governments to
defend migrant labor rights.
* Their program of action, however, slowed down once countries like Malaysia,
Singapore, and Thailand refused to recognize the rights of undocumented
migrant workers and the rights of the families of migrants.
Final Challenge
* Western Government - may see regional organizations not simply as economic
formations but also as instruments of political democratization.
* Non-Western Government and developing societies, may have a different view
regarding globalization, development, and democracy.
- Singapore, China, and Russia see democracy as an obstacle to the
implementation and deepening of economic globalization because
constant public inquiry about economic projects and lengthy debate
slows down implementation or leads to unclear outcomes.
- Democracy's tedious procedures must, therefore, give way to efficiency.
Conclusion
- Official regional associations are now widespread all over the world.
- The population of the countries that joined the Asia-Pacific Economic Council (APEC)
alone comprised 37% of the world's population in 2007.
- These countries are also part of "smaller" organizations that include the following:
* Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
* Shanghai Cooperation Organization
* North American Free Trade Agreement
* Caribbean and Pacific Group of States
* Union of South American Nations
* North Korea is part of the Regional Forum, which discusses security issues in
the region.
- In the same way, the countries will find it difficult to reject all forms of global economic
integration, it will also be hard for them to turn their backs on their regions.
*Even if the UK leaves the EU, it must continue to trade with its immediate
neighbors and will, therefore be forced to implement many EU rules.
- None of this is to say that regional organizations will remain unaltered.
- The history regionalism shows that regional associations emerge as new global
concerns arise.
- The future of regionalism will depend on the immense changes in global politics that
will emerge in the 21st century.