Session - 7 - Problem Set-Solution - PK
Session - 7 - Problem Set-Solution - PK
Session - 7 - Problem Set-Solution - PK
z=(x-mean)/SD
s2 = np (1 - p) = 100(.20) (.80) = 16
16 4
15.5 20
z 1.13
4
P(x £ 15.5) = P (z £ -1.13) = .1292
An Internal Revenue Oversight Board survey found that 82% of taxpayers said that it was very important for the Int
a. For a sample of eight taxpayers, what is the probability that at least six taxpayers say that it is very important to e
b. For a sample of 80 taxpayers, what is the probability that at least 60 taxpayers say that it is very important to ens
c. As the number of trails in a binomial distribution application becomes large, what is the advantage of using the n
d. When the number of trials for a binominal distribution application becomes large, would developers of statistica
SPSS…..........inbuit functio,, n = 50
t on their tax returns (The Wall Street Journal, February 11, 2009).
binomial distribution probability function shown in Section 5.4 to answer this question.
rmal approximation of the binomial distribution to answer this question.
n shown in Section 5.5 or the normal approximation of the binomial distribution shown in Section 6.3? Explain.
a. n n!
f ( x) p x (1 p ) n x p x (1 p ) n x
x
x !( n x )!
n = 8, p = .82
8!
f (6) .826 (1 .82)8 6 28(.82) 6 (1 .82) 2 .2758
6!(8 6)!
8!
f (7) .827 (1 .82) 8 7 8(.82) 7 (1 .82)1 .3590
7!(8 7)!
8!
f (8) .828 (1 .82)8 8 1(.82) 8 (1 .82) 0 .2044
8!(8 8)!
P( x 6) f (6) f (7) f (8) .2758 .3590 .2044 .8392
b. m = np = (80)(.82) = 65.6
11.8080 3.4363
At x = 59.5,
x 59.5 65.6 P ( x 59.5) 1 .0375 .9625
z 1.78
3.4363
c. The advantage of using the normal approximation of the binomial distribution is that it eases
d. Students may be tempted to say that with the speed of computers, the developers
5) 1 .0375 .9625
ial distribution is that it eases and simplifies the calculations required to obtain the desired probability. For part (b) with n = 80, we would
of computers, the developers of statistical software would be able to use the binomial probability function f(x) as described in part (c) and
part (b) with n = 80, we would have had to compute f(60) + f(61) + f(62) + … + f(80) using the binomial probability function f(x). This would
(x) as described in part (c) and compute the exact probability rather than the normal approximation. However, developers of statistical so
bility function f(x). This would have been tedious and time consuming.
ver, developers of statistical software are also interested in fast, efficient, and easy to program computational procedures provided such p
al procedures provided such procedures provide reliable and accurate answers. With a large number of trials, the normal approximation o
s, the normal approximation of the binomial probability distribution is very good. Statistical software developers may chose to use the no
pers may chose to use the normal approximation of the binomial probability distribution in some statistical routines. For example, Minita
routines. For example, Minitab uses the normal approximation of binomial probabilities in the Nonparametric sign test whenever n is grea
ric sign test whenever n is greater than 50.
Playing video and computer games is very popular. Over 70% of households play such games.
Of those individuals who play video and computer games, 18% are under 18 years old, 53% are 18–59 years old, an
a. For a sample of 800 people who play these games, how many would you expect to be under 18 years of age?
b. For a sample of 600 people who play these games, what is the probability that fewer than 100 will be under 18 y
c. For a sample of 800 people who play these games, what is the probability that 200 or more will be over 59 years
p
under 18 0.18 z= (x-mean)/SD
18 - 59 0.53
<59 0.29
n p np(mean) n(1-p) SDsqrt(np(1-P)) binomial Appx Norm
a 800 0.18 144 656 10.86646
b 600 0.18 108 492 9.410632 P(x<100) P(x<99.5)
c 800 0.29 232 568 12.83433 P(x>=200) P(x>=199.5)
such games.
s old, 53% are 18–59 years old, and 29% are over 59 years old (The Wall Street Journal, March 6, 2012).
t to be under 18 years of age?
fewer than 100 will be under 18 years of age?
200 or more will be over 59 years of age?
z area under
0.184
P(z>=-2.53)
0.9943
a. m = np = 800(.18) = 144
b. m = np = 600(.18) = 108
np (1 p ) (600)(.18)(.82) 9.4106
For x < 100, use the continuity correction to find P(x < 99.5)
At x = 99.5,
The probability that less than 100 individuals will be under 18 years of age is .1841.
c. np (1 p) (800)(.29)(.71) 12.8343
For x = 200 or more, use the continuity correction to find P(x ≥ 199.5)
At x = 199.5,
x 199.5 232
z 2.53 P (z ≥ -2.53) = 1 - .0057 = .9943
12.8343
P(x ≥ 199.5) = .9943
np (1 p ) (120)(.79)(.21) 4.46
The probability that at least 85 employers provide a two-day Thanksgiving holiday = P(x³ 84.5).
At x =84..5
x 84.5 94.8
z 2.31
4.46
Therefore,
P( x 84.5) 1 P ( z 2.31) 1 .0104 .9896
x 100.5 94.8
z 1.28
4.46
P(x<100.5) = P(z<1.28) = .8997
At x = 89.5,
x 89.5 94.8
z 1.19
4.46
P(x< 89.5) = P(z< -1.19) = .1170
Therefore,
P(89.5 x 100.5) 1
c. m = np = 120(.19) = 22.8
x 19.5 22.8
z .77
4.30
Therefore,
P( x 19.5) P( z .77) .2206
holiday = P(x³ 84.5).
At x = 10,
x 10 8.35
z .66
2.5
At x = 5,
x 5 8.35
z 1.34
2.5
P(5 ≤ x ≤ 10) = P(-1.34 ≤ z ≤ .66)= P(z ≤ .66) - P(z ≤ -1.34)
0.6553
0.6553
b. Find the z-value that cuts off an area of .03 in the upper tail. Using a cumulative probability of
1 - .03 = .97, z = 1.88 provides an area of .03 in the upper tail of the normal distribution.
A household must view slightly over 13 hours of television a day to be in the top 3% of television viewing
c. At x = 3,
x 3 8.35
z 2.14
2.5
The probability a household views more than 3 hours of television a day is .9838.
ween 5 and 10 hours a day is .6553.
cumulative probability of
l distribution.
90 80
c. P(z ≤ 1) = P(x ≤ 90) = .1587 z 1
10
NOT INCLUDED
net service provider, and the fourth largest telephone service provider in the United States. Generally known for quality and reliable servic
b. At 630,
630 450
z 1.80
100 96.41% do worse and 3.59% do better .
c. At 480,
480 450
z .30
100 Area to left is .6179
38.21% are acceptable.
Area to left is .3085
The probability of a Houston brand manager having a base salary in excess of $100,000 is .284
b. At 100,000
100, 000 97, 417
z .12
21,800
P(x > 100,000) = P(z > .12) = 1 - P(z £ .12) = 1 - .5478 = .4522
The probability of a Los Angeles brand manager having a base salary in excess of $100,000 is .4522
c. At x = 75,000
75, 000 97, 417
z 1.03
21,800
P(x < 75,000) = P(z < -1.03) = .1515
The probability of a Los Angeles brand manager receiving a base salary below $75,000 is smal
d. The answer to this is the Houston brand manager base salary that cuts off an area of .01 in the
Use z = 2.33
A Los Angeles brand manager who makes $134,959 or more will earn more than 99% of the H
y in excess of $100,000 is .2843.
0,000 is .4522
at cuts off an area of .01 in the upper tail of the distribution for Houston brand managers.
x 19, 000
z 1.28
2100
x = 19,000 – 1.28(2100) = 16,312
c. Find the z value that cuts off an area of .03 in the upper tail: z = 1.88. Solve for x,
x 19, 000
z 1.88
2100
x = 19,000 + 1.88(2100) = 22,948