Sofia Ariza JRN 406 Final Essay
Sofia Ariza JRN 406 Final Essay
Sofia Ariza JRN 406 Final Essay
JRN 406
Robert Osborne
Discuss the role of journalists and the balance between traditional journalistic standards and spin
related content, and the subsequent impacts this can have in shaping public opinion and society
as a whole.
The craft of journalism is one in itself, but there are two types of journalism; citizen and
traditional journalism. As stated by researcher Corinne Barnes, “Peter Dooley suggests that,
traditional journalism is the outside looking in. Citizen journalism is the inside looking out. In
order to get the complete story, it helps to have both points of view. Dooley's argument suggests
that there is a place for this emerging phenomenon called citizen journalism, as well as for the
profession that has been practised for decades called mainstream or traditional
journalism,”(Barnes, 2012). Though both types of journalism are useful and necessary, it often
occurs that citizen journalism helps to promote spin related content because of the way it is
conducted, such as the commonly occurring fake news and public relations stunts of the 21st
century, especially with the wide range use of social media and the access that anyone in the
world has to publish false news stories. Children absorb the words they hear until they slowly
attain their full vocabulary when they reach a certain age. Same goes for societal values; the
news and propaganda that people see and hear on a daily basis are absorbed by their brains,
which plants seeds from which new ideas flourish and influences the way that people think and
view the world around them. The spread of spin related content is prevented by traditional
journalism by conducting journalism in an ethical and responsible manner, while on the other
hand, citizen journalism promotes spin related content by careless and unethical reporting, and
As Barnes states, "The idea behind citizen journalism is that people without professional
or formal training in journalism have an opportunity to use the tools of modern technology and
the almost limitless reach of the Internet in order to create content that would otherwise not be
revealed, as this kind of journalism goes far beyond the reach of professional
journalism,”(Barnes, 2012). Even in some of the poorest countries in the world, people have
access to technology and with that comes access to social media. Nowadays anyone can take a
photo or video and publish it for thousands, even millions of people to see. This is often the
cause of misinformation and spin related content; a person posts a fake story or incident they
recorded or made which becomes viral, and the public believes it and accept it as truth, and in
result they share it until it becomes a chain reaction that reaches the mainstream media
connecting the story to millions of people. In the 21st century world, as Ryan Holiday says, “Do
nothing—you can still turn it into something. Do something wrong, don’t despair; you can spin it
beyond comprehension,” (Holiday, 2012, pp. 253). In this quote from his book “Trust Me I’m
Lying,” Holiday explains in simple words the citizen journalism of today, in which people can
turn something as small as a cat chasing a cheetah into a viral story, and if the video is fake, it
can be twisted and discussed in the web so much that people no longer comprehend whether it’s
real or fake therefore they choose to accept it as real because humans often believe what they
wish was real, even when it’s not. As researcher Jithender J. Timothy explained, “Depending on
this uncertainty, individuals tend to accept or avoid opinions that confirm or contradict their
respective preconceived opinions.” (Timothy, 2017). However, It isn’t always a fake video of a
cat chasing a cheetah or a chimpanzee with an AK-47 that is published for millions of people to
see, it’s sometimes fake news articles insisting that governments are vaccinating people in order
to track their locations and control their brains. The damage and panic that these citizen
journalists cause by creating these false and spin related stories result in something as grave as
people refusing to get vaccinated because of the fake story that they believed to be true. Take for
instance the 2016 U.S. presidential elections, in which as researchers Hunt Allcott and Matthew
Gentzkow found that, “The average American saw and remembered 0.92 pro-Trump fake news
stories and 0.23 pro-Clinton fake news stories, with just over half of those who recalled seeing
fake news stories believing them; for fake news to have changed the outcome of the election, a
single fake article would need to have had the same persuasive effect as 36 television campaign
ads,” (Allcott & Matthew, 2017). This explains the fact that a single fake news story has the
power to change the results of something as important as a presidential election, which in turn
proves that the fake and spin related content that people believe in, ultimately shapes the way
they think and influences their decision making. The creators of spin related content aren’t
always citizen journalists, they can also be owners of companies or independent workers such as
artists who create spin related content in order to attain the attention of the public, and ultimately
their money. An example would be the Derbyshire Fairy Hoax which went viral online when
artist Dan Baines posted an image online of the body of a ‘fairy,’ which thousands of people
believed to be true and even BBC published the story because of the rage it caused when it
turned out to be a sculpture made by the artist in order to attract attention and promote his work.
As Timothy explained, “An individual or groups of individuals can be targeted with a certain
objective,” (Timothy, 2012). The goal of the spinner who in this case was Baines, was to grow as
an artist and attract attention and potential customers, which he clearly did because of the
outstanding sculpture he created. People like artists or musicians, who thrive off of public
attention have often been caught in incidents where they create spin related content for the sole
West Indies lecturer Patrick Pendergast, underscores the importance of training in journalism: "A
journalist is defined as a trained professional who, in the defence, protection and advancement of
the public's interest, uses media and communication platforms to pursue and report what is true
with fairness, balance and accuracy and always in recognition of the principles, values and ethics
of the profession of journalism,” (Barnes, 2012). Trained journalists work for the public’s right
to know the truth, in other words they work for the people, even though some people don’t
believe or appreciate the work traditional journalists do. Not to say that some citizen journalists
don’t have the same intentions, but the majority of the time they post stories for the views,
money, and attention, without taking into consideration whether it’s ethical or not to post fake
stories and spin related content that tricks people. Barnes explains that, “When it comes to issues
of ethics, those who are untrained are unable to understand that there must be certain guidelines
to which news dissemination must adhere and certain principles that must not be compromised,”
(Barnes, 2012). When traditional journalists are covering a story, they will go above and beyond
to fact check every detail before they publish the story for the world to see, in order to protect the
subjects of the story, their own credibility as journalists, the company they work for, and most
importantly, the right that people have to know the truth. For example, now with the present
COVID-19 pandemic, there are hundreds of news articles in which journalists debunk fake
COVID-19 news in order to help the public and prevent people from falling for misinformation,
such as fake articles stating that drinking bleach can cure you from COVID-19. While it may
sound irrational to most people, unfortunately there is always someone that bites the dust. In a
recent USC Annenberg Media, journalists Alexis Francel, Anthony Gharib, Dustin Hochmuth,
Enzo Luna, Himani Pangal, and Jolene Pumphrey debunked myths that people fell for because
they trusted them to be legit news. This includes fake stories stating that the vaccine causes
infertility, alters human DNA and contains tracker chips. The journalists worked together to fact
check the information and prove it to be false, which is essentially what traditional journalists do,
they find a story, fact check it and if it’s true they publish it and if not, they discard it or publish
it as a debunk/fact check article. As Barnes explains, “Only a trained journalist understands the
level of fact-checking that is required before a news article can be published as factual,” (Barnes,
2012).
The arguments presented above can also be contradicted because not all citizen
journalism is fake news or spin, and not all traditional journalism meets the ethical and truthful
guidelines that journalism stands for. There have been countless cases where citizen journalism
served to inform the public on important matters, or helped mainstream journalists to complete
and verify an important story. Such is the case of the murder of George Floyd, an African
American man who was murdered by a police officer after the officer pressed down on Floyd’s
neck using his knee. If it hadn’t been for citizen journalists who don’t realize that they were
committing journalism by recording the incident and posting it on their social media as it was
happening, the news story would have had a different outcome due to the prejudice and bias that
the black community faces when they’re being presented on the news. An example of this
prejudice and bias is present when white people who commit grave crimes such as mass murder
are excused on the basis of mental health and photos of them looking like innocent and good
people are used on the news, but when black people commit a crime such as thievery, their
mugshots are published and they are represented in a worse way than in which a white murderer
is represented. However, as Barnes explained, “On the other hand, user-generated content is
inherently biased, so the notion of objectivity is far-fetched, and as far as accuracy is concerned,
this is a concept that is very difficult to maintain in these kinds of writings, where there is really
no accountability,” (Barnes, 2012). If the story had only been covered by citizen journalists and
accepted as truth, chances are that the story would have been twisted with bias and the factual
truth would not have been unveiled had it not been for traditional journalists. Traditional
journalists used the videos, interviewed those who witnessed the event, and conducted fact
checking until they finally published the story and updated it as new information resurfaced.
Clearly, citizen journalism and traditional journalism can work together and support each other
in order to maintain ethical journalistic standards. As Barnes explained, "Here is, in fact, a case
for harmonious coexistence, as long as each recognizes the limitations of the other. The most
valuable components of citizen journalism are the ideas, comments, pictures and videos which
are generated by people on the ground and which mainstream or traditional journalists can use as
they shape the final product,” (Barnes, 2012). On the opposite side, traditional journalists aren’t
always in the right in the way that they report, as there have been countless cases in which
traditional journalism has let down the public by spreading fake news or news that were poorly
fact-checked. A great example is the case of the Hitler Dairies Hoax which took place in
Germany, when a reporter from Stern magazine, a well known magazine in Germany worked
with a con artist with an expertise in forgery to publish a story stating that they had found
Hitler’s lost diaries. The diaries were auctioned, and its rights were bought for millions of
dollars, approved authentic by experts, and the story reached worldwide news until it was later
revealed as a hoax. This hoax ruined the reputation of Stern Magazine and left those involved
with fines, jail time and ruined reputations. As reporter for The New Yorker Sally McGrane
explained, “Many people believe that there was simply too much money at stake for anyone to
come to their senses,” (McGrane, 2013). In regards to people asking how they could have let
such a stunt to take place. Which proves that often even the people with important positions who
are expected to be honest and ethical, care more for money and power and very little for the
truth. People believed Stern magazine because of the credibility, power, and authority that it’s
name held in Germany, but this is proof that not all traditional journalists can be trusted, as there
are some in it for the money, not to honour the craft and ethics of journalism.
In conclusion, there is a light and dark side to citizen journalism and traditional
journalism. Sometimes both work hand in hand to deliver an ethical result to the people, but
when traditional journalists forget the ethics and guidelines of the job, they lose the title of a
traditional journalist and become citizen journalists. Citizen journalists could at times collaborate
traditional journalism with videos, images, and investigation conducted by the citizen/s, but
when working alone, citizen journalism is a highly unreliable source because without proper
training, practise in the field, and accurate understanding of the ethics and guidelines of
journalism, things like fact checking, detecting spin related content, and taking ethics into
account before publishing an article slips right through their fingers. These mistakes, as small as
they may seem to some can have grave consequences, especially in a modern world where in the
matter of seconds a story from Africa can become viral in Alaska. When the story is accurate and
truthful, this is a matter to celebrate, but when it’s not, this results in not only the names of the
people involved being shamed, it can result in people believing lies and in result changing the
way they view society and make decisions for the worse. Theodore Roosevelt said at the national
convention of the Progressive party in Chicago on August 6, 1912, “Behind the ostensible
responsibility to the people,” (Roosevelt, 1912). A quote from 109 years ago is extremely
relevant today, even more so today than it was then. Our minds and societal views and values are
shaped by invisible governments through our everyday interactions with the media in which
propaganda, fake news, biased news and spin related content is present and exists as truth in our
brains. The reason it exists as truth is because we as a society were raised to accept what he learn
from figures of authority as truth, instead of questioning it. The crucial lesson here is to question
everything and not believe everything published by traditional journalists or citizen journalists,
while one can be said to be more trustworthy and reliable than the other, it doesn’t mean no
mistakes are committed, and while citizen journalism is often responsible for creating and
promoting spin related content and fake news, there are times when their journalism is used to
Sources:
• Alexis Francel, Anthony Gharib, et al. “Myths about the COVID-19 Vaccine Debunked.” Arc
covid-19-vaccine-debunked/.
• Allcott, Hunt, and Matthew Gentzkow. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.”
doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
• Corinne Barnes (2012) Citizen Journalism vs. Traditional Journalism: A Case for
• Holiday, Ryan. Trust Me, I'm Lying: the Tactics and Confessions of a Media Manipulator.
Portfolio/Penguin, 2018.
• McGrane, Sally. “Diary of the Hitler Diary Hoax.” The New Yorker, 25 Apr. 2013,
www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/diary-of-the-hitler-diary-hoax.
Roosevelt: His Life and Times on Film : Digital Collections : Library of Congress.”
and-essays/sound-recordings-of-theodore-roosevelts-voice/.
• Timothy, Jithender J. “How Does Propaganda Influence the Opinion Dynamics of a
doi:arXiv:1703.10138v2 .
• “UK | England | Derbyshire | Fairy Fool Sparks Huge Response.” BBC News, BBC, 1 Apr.
2007, news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/derbyshire/6514283.stm.