Minutes Good Practice Guide 0.5
Minutes Good Practice Guide 0.5
Minutes Good Practice Guide 0.5
A. Introduction
1. Good minuting is an important element of an effective 21st century university, although it can
be a deceptively difficult and time-consuming task. In a civic university such as Leicester, which
is publicly accountable for its actions to the Office for Students and the taxpayer, effective
minuting plays a critical role in capturing and recording institutional risks, issues and decisions.
At the University of Leicester, it is recognised as a professional task, usually undertaken by the
professional services.
2. There is no ‘one size’ fits all approach; minutes are context-sensitive, with each committee and
chair having their own preference. Nonetheless, adopting a consistent approach to minuting is
beneficial for the University. It helps for audit purposes, ensures decisions and actions are
captured clearly and consistently, and helps new secretaries unfamiliar with the process. The
purpose of this guidance is just this – assisting secretaries in undertaking one of the most
fundamental tasks: taking and writing minutes.
3. This resource outlines the purpose and structure of good minutes and provides advice on the
minute-writing process, from taking notes at the meeting to the seeking of approval of the final
minutes at the next committee meeting. Lastly, this guide provides information on style and
terminology. It can be read in conjunction with the University’s committee servicing guidelines,
which cover more broadly the holistic practice of servicing a committee.
4. For easy and quick reading, a list of ‘top 10’ tips is provided at section K.
5. For the purpose of this guide, the term committee secretary is used as a ‘catch-all’ term for
Clerks, minute-takers and note-takers. Similarly, the term committee is used where it might also
be applied to board, group or meeting.
Purpose of Minutes
General
7. Minutes should represent an accurate summary of relevant discussions and decisions taken by
the committee. Brevity is key. Secretaries should avoid minuting lengthy exchanges between
members and repeating content contained within the reports – instead, they should be
selective and only pick up the relevant, main threads. The final minute should summarise the
main points of a discussion, leading logically and clearly to any decisions or outcomes.
8. The minute of a discussion should be self-contained so that any reader, including those not
present at the meeting, can understand easily what was discussed and the outcome.
9. Minutes should be written in the past tense, so that future generations can review decisions
taken.
10. The names of individual speakers should not be recorded. Minutes should be impersonal and
provide a summary of the discussion rather than a detailed account of every individual
contribution. Personal pronouns should not be used. An exception may be where a member will
explicitly request to be named in the minutes.
11. Minutes should be as decisive and unambiguous as possible, especially where they pertain to
decisions or actions (section E refers).
C. Taking notes
12. Good committee secretaries will be experienced at taking notes whilst also participating fully in
a meeting.
13. The most important skill in taking notes is listening and engaging carefully with what is being
said and mentally sorting out the important information from the unimportant, thinking early
about themes and the framework through which the minute of the discussion will be recorded.
Secretaries should avoid writing down everything that is said at the meeting, as they will quickly
lose track of discussions. Of course, a lot of what is being said can either be redundant or
repetitive. Secretaries should try to note down the main, substantive points, any decisions made
and future actions that have been agreed. If they are well prepared and understand the issues
being discussed, this becomes easier. If in doubt, secretaries should err on the side of caution
and make a note and then decide later whether it needs to be included. Not everything
contained within the notes will make it into the final minutes.
14. Initials of speakers should be used, as far as possible, to identify who made the point. While
names will not usually be used in minutes, secretaries may occasionally wish to refer back to a
speaker for clarification of a point made. It can also be useful if there is any dispute later over
who said what.
15. In some committees, the secretary may be accompanied by a suitably skilled minute taker. This
enables the secretary to focus on the discussion and contribute as appropriate whilst also
ensuring that minutes are recorded appropriately. Such arrangements should be discussed and
agreed with the Chair in advance.
16. A good secretary will have the confidence to ask for clarification during a meeting – e.g. if in
doubt about a point, jargon or acronym. Equally, if unsure about a decision, the secretary should
always seek clarification during the meeting.
17. It is useful to meet with the chair as soon as possible after the meeting to go over notes to get
clarification over a topic that was discussed, or seek confirmation as to the information to
include or exclude from the minutes. It may also be necessary to contact other members to
clarify any issues raised during the meeting.
Retention of notes
18. Notes should be destroyed once the minutes for the meeting to which they relate have been
approved. This is because any such notes could be ‘discoverable’ under the Freedom of
Information Act. The approved minutes form the only legal record of the meeting and should
express the singular version of truth for regulatory, legal, audit and other requirements.
19. Good minute-writing can be a much misunderstood and under-appreciated skill, and it often
surprises those new to the task how long the process can take. The exact amount of time
needed to write minutes varies a lot, depending on the nature of the business and on the
secretary’s level of experience. However, if dealing with complex issues on which there was
substantial debate, a good rule of thumb is that writing the minutes will take a reasonably
experienced secretary about twice as long as the discussion lasted. For new secretaries, it could
take considerably longer.
20. Most secretaries find it very helpful to be able to write their minutes in one sitting, away from
interruptions. If possible, minutes are best written a place where there are no interruptions.
21. Subject to the length of the meeting and the complexity of its subject matter, secretaries should
aim to finish the first draft of the minutes within 2-3 working days of the meeting. Experience
tends to show that the longer they are left after that the poorer the recall (and therefore the
minutes) will be. Secretaries should bear in mind that having the task of writing the minutes
(especially of a long complex meeting) hanging over them for any length of time can have an
adverse impact on their other work.
Minute writing timeline and process
Format
23. The order of items in the minutes should correspond to that set out in the agenda. Where items
have been taken out of order (e.g. an item was taken early to allow a member to leave), it is still
useful to record the item in the original place in the minutes as included on the agenda. An item
may be moved into a different section of the minutes if, for example, it becomes apparent that
an unreserved item is actually of a commercially sensitive nature and needs to be recorded in
the reserved minutes. Guidance on reserved and unreserved business can be found in the
Committee Servicing Guide.
24. Each item should be numbered and have a heading. Minutes are numbered from the start of
the calendar year and continue in sequence through all the meetings in that year. The minute
is prefixed with the year, e.g. 18/M1, 18/M2 etc., to ensure consistency and to allow a reference
to 'minute 18/M27', rather than 'minute 4 of the meeting held on 6 July 2018'.
25. When an item relates to a previous minute, this should be referenced within brackets at the
end of the sentence – e.g. “The Committee received and noted an update on the USS valuation
(minutes 18/M31 and 18/M47 refer)”.
26. When capturing a committee’s discussion under matters arising on the agenda, this should be
recorded in the minutes under the ‘matters arising’ heading only if it can be recorded with a
short statement. Otherwise, particularly where a committee will have had a long discussions, it
should be included as a separate numbered minute with its own heading.
27. If the minutes require sub-sections, use a., b., c. etc. for the first level and i., ii., iii. etc. for the
second level.
28. Items raised under ‘Any other business’ should be recorded under a numbered heading
reflecting the specific item. The heading ‘Any other business’ should not appear in the minutes.
Tense
29. Minutes should be written in the past tense and in the third person.
The changes are due to take place […] The changes were due to take place […]
The Committee agrees to revise the The Committee agreed to revise the
proposal proposal
Other tenses
For things that happened before the meeting the equivalent sentence (to above) would read:
‘The Committee noted that at its previous meeting it had agreed to revise the proposal.’
For things that were planned to happen after the meeting the equivalent sentence would
read: ‘The Committee approved the revised proposal which the Chair would outline to
Senate.’
For things that the committee decided to recommend for approval by a higher body the
equivalent sentence would read: ‘The Committee agreed to recommend that the proposed
policy should be implemented.’
Structure of a minute
a. Introduction.
b. Summary.
c. Record of decisions made / conclusion / actions required.
31. When faced with a particularly complex item, secretaries should establish a logical framework
for the minute along the lines of the above structure. Focus should be placed on the conclusion
and key discussion points should be arranged in the logical order in which they lead up to it.
Often, a discussion at the meeting may be relatively untidy, perhaps with pros and cons for a
proposal scattered throughout the notes. Different speakers may have made much the same
point, perhaps with a slight variation in each case. Secretaries can tidy up and re-order the
points made, as long as they accurately reflect in the summary the gist of the main points made
and they lead logically to the conclusion reached by the committee. It is not necessary to
capture very single point made.
32. Sometimes this will involve amalgamating points made by different speakers, and often it will
involve bringing together points made at different times in the meeting. That's fine. Secretaries
should remember that the minutes are a summary. They are not required to give a blow by blow
account of precisely what was said at each stage. Secretaries can use their own words if they
better convey the gist of a point made in slightly different words at the meeting.
33. Each minute must conclude with the final view or explicit decision of the committee about the
item of business, which should always be expressed in one of the following forms:
a. Approved.
b. Endorsed.
c. Noted.
34. Secretaries should record a committee’s decisions in bold to make it more visible to readers.
The decision should be located at the end of the minute, for example ‘The Committee approved
the policy.’ Multiple decisions should appear in separate paragraphs with the decision located
at the end of each paragraph.
35. When feeling stuck, secretaries should not try to capture every minute perfectly in the first draft
– this can delay and frustrate. Secretaries should try to capture the key information from the
notes and move on to complete the first draft in full. It is always easier to edit/review a
completed draft than it is to come up with a perfect set of minutes first time.
36. It can be useful to print the first draft in hard copy, and in double line spacing, to do a ‘red pen’
review. By looking at the draft minutes in a different format (i.e. not on a screen) errors are
more likely to be found. It can also allow secretaries to think more creatively about how to
capture complex discussions.
37. Many secretaries find it useful to ask a colleague to review their minutes and vice-versa. A
second pair of eyes is more likely to find mistakes, particularly spelling errors.
38. As a rough estimate, minutes are likely circa 2 pages long for every hour of the meeting.
However, this is only a rough estimate and the exact length is likely to vary significantly between
different committees.
E. Actions
Capturing actions
39. The minutes should record clearly the nature of the action, the timeframe for delivery of the
action, and the person taking the action forward. Where the person proposed to take forward
the action did not attend the meeting, it is good practice for secretaries to notify them
immediately after the meeting. Decisions need to be recorded in a clear and concise manner,
and should be written as decisions of the committee rather than those of individuals.
40. Responsibility for such action should be indicated in capital letters and in square brackets, for
example: ‘The Committee approved the new policy and requested that the Secretary of the
Personnel Committee prepares a progress report for the next meeting. [ACTION: JOANNE
SMITH]’.
41. The secretary must ensure that the need for any follow-up action is communicated to the
relevant individual(s) immediately after the meeting. This is particularly important for
individuals who were not present at the meeting, and who may have to take action
straightaway. A copy of the relevant minute (once approved by the Chair) should be provided
to them.
42. For some matters the follow-up action may involve a specific requirement for some or all
members of the committee to play an active role in conveying, explaining and promoting the
decision of the committee to the wider University community. In order for them to do this
effectively, members may find it helpful to be provided with a separate note on the “key
messages” that they are expected to convey, as this is likely to involve additional or more
detailed information than would be included in the minutes.
43. It is the secretary’s responsibility to engage with action holders and ensure that the committee
receives updates from action holders on how they have implemented their follow-up actions.
Usually, the committee will receive updates in writing or orally under the matters arising
heading on the agenda.
“The Committee agreed that the Head of College would write a report on […]”
If several members of staff are concerned, it is best to name them all, being careful to
indicate with whom the initiative is to rest; thus:
“The Committee agreed that the Head of College, in consultation with the Pro-Vice-
Chancellor Students, would write a report on […]”
Action summary
44. A separate action summary table should be produced alongside the minutes. All actions should
be extracted from the minutes and documented therein, including minute reference. A
template attached is attached here.
45. The action sheet will then be submitted to the next meeting of the committee, alongside the
previous minutes, and considered under matters arising, where questions and brief progress
updates on these items can be discussed.
46. The initial version of the minutes must be labelled ‘draft’ in the header of every page and be
completed within three to five working days. Secretaries should submit their draft minutes to
the chair and within five working days of the meeting. With particularly complex matters, a
meeting with the chair will enable secretaries to check thoroughly specific issues raised within
the minutes.
47. For routine meetings, there should only be minimal changes to the minutes. It is however not
realistic to expect minutes always to be ‘right first time’, particularly when dealing with highly
sensitive or complex matters in the course of a lengthy meeting. Opinion will often vary on how
certain points should be expressed; this may simply be a matter of emphasis or nuance, but
getting this right is important particularly if the minutes will be shared with a regulator or third
party – such as auditors. Editing by committee members, who are ultimately responsible for the
accuracy, should not be regarded as a failing on the part of the committee secretary, but instead
as a sign that responsibilities are understood and taken seriously.
48. Once the minutes have been approved by the chair, and after any necessary amendments have
been made, they must be labelled ‘unconfirmed’ in the header of every page. The unconfirmed
minutes should normally be circulated to members by email no later than ten working days
after the meeting. Minutes should be summarised as reports and be submitted to the next
meeting of the parent committee. A template for a report of a committee meeting is available
here.
49. The minutes of a committee are not approved formally until they have been approved at that
committee’s next meeting. A master copy of the minutes should be prepared for the chair
without the ‘unconfirmed’ label in the header. Once they have been approved in the meeting,
the chair must sign off the minutes. The minutes can then be filed electronically. Senate, Council
and standing committees of Council will require hard copies of the minutes to be signed by the
chair and then be stored securely.
Confidentiality
50. Secretaries should be mindful of the confidentiality of minutes, particularly when they discuss
a named individual, and should circulate with caution to relevant members only. If a meeting
deals with both confidential and non-confidential matters, the minutes must be separated so
that the section dealing with confidential issues cannot be viewed by a wider audience,
particularly in the case of student representatives. Secretaries should also be aware of General
Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) legislation.
51. One of the first steps in preparing for a meeting is in preparing the agenda, seeking approval
from the chair and circulating papers. The best secretaries will seek a full understanding of the
issues on the agenda when they are working with the Chair to agree sequencing, timing and
appropriateness of the agenda. Secretaries who have created the agenda from a basis of full
understanding of the issues have few problems following the discussion at the meeting,
understanding the points made, and then writing their minutes. Secretaries should read the
papers fully before the meeting, discuss any questions in advance with authors or the chair and
anticipate, where possible, how discussion at the meeting is likely to take place.
52. There should be a cycle of business for every committee that secretaries should use to inform
agenda creation.
Discoverability
53. Minutes of committees should be written in the understanding that they are formal documents
which are often open to external verification, audit, Freedom of Information (FoI) requests, and
something of the future. For example, auditors may look to minutes for evidence that a
particular proposal has been scrutinised and that available options were appraised
appropriately before a decision was taken. Regulators may look for evidence that the University
has complied with regulations, such as the UK Quality Code. FoI requests can be made for a
number of reasons, including to examine whether appropriate governance processes were
followed when considering contentious proposals. Secretaries should keep in mind that the
majority of FoI requests are made by journalists who want to file a good story.
54. The university uses two distinct terms to describe what a committee is expected to do as part
of each agenda item. Items that are ‘to consider’ require an active decision being made by the
committee and are usually accompanied by a specific recommendation. Items that are ‘to note’
do not require a decision to be taken and are usually presented to the committee for
information. Secretaries should make sure that the minutes capture accurately what the
discussion was meant to have achieved.
H. Style Guide
55. Minutes can be very tedious to read if the same verbs are used over and over again. Secretaries
should make a habit of looking for alternatives to the words which immediately spring to mind.
For example, if "the Chair stated […]" has already been used, then the next time "It was pointed
out that […]” could be used.
Useful verbs
accepted felt queried
acknowledged informed questioned
advised noted rejected
agreed objected reported
argued observed stated
believed outlined summarised
commented pointed out suggested
complained proposed supported
considered put forward (the view that) told
explained reiterated took the view that
expressed (the view that) reminded voiced
Active Form
57. A sentence will usually be shorter and more direct if it is constructed with its verb in the active
rather than the passive voice. For example:
Is better than
“The Committee considered proposals under which the number of student placements would
be increased.”
58. Though official documents should have a certain dignity, this is not achieved merely by using
long words. It is a good rule not to use a long word when a shorter one would do as well, or a
word of Latin origin when an Anglo-Saxon word will do instead. Thus, secretaries should use
buy, try, pay, instead of purchase, endeavour, remuneration. Minutes are there to form a
factual record of the business conducted at the meeting and are not a romanticised version of
the truth.
Adjectives
59. Many adjectives can be dispensed with. There can be a tendency in recording discussions at
meetings to preserve the exaggeration of the spoken word. Secretaries should try to avoid doing
this. For instance, “it is of vital importance” usually means no more than “it is important”.
60. Word contractions should be avoided, and where abbreviations or acronyms are used they
should be defined in brackets following the first example. For instance: “University Leadership
Team (ULT)” at first use, thereafter “ULT”.
Sentence structure
61. Minutes will be more enjoyable to read if a varied sentence structures is used. Here are a few
examples of the many different ways in which sentences might be introduced:
I. Bibliography
The University of Western Australia, Governance, How to take and write minutes
(http://www.governance.uwa.edu.au/committees/principles/meetings/preparation/minutes)
1. Purpose of Minutes
Record decisions made by the committee, and possibly (briefly) the reasons for them
Note action required, and by whom
Provide a record of those present at the meeting
Communicate information to people who weren't there
9. Structure of a minutes
Every minute is usually structured as follows:
a. Introduction.
b. Summary.
c. Record of decisions made / conclusion / actions required.