Scribd
Upload
46 views5 pages

Didactic of Mathemtic

This document provides guidelines and a rubric for an activity evaluating students' ability to plan math lessons. Students must select a teaching recommendation from a book, write a summary, and create an original lesson plan applying the recommendation. They will post their work publicly and provide feedback to peers. Their individual submission is a final document with the summary and lesson plan, following APA style and avoiding plagiarism. Performance will be assessed on a 120-point scale across four criteria: the quality of the summary, lesson plan, feedback provided, and final submission.

Uploaded by

PEDRO RAMOS MACEA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
46 views5 pages

Didactic of Mathemtic

This document provides guidelines and a rubric for an activity evaluating students' ability to plan math lessons. Students must select a teaching recommendation from a book, write a summary, and create an original lesson plan applying the recommendation. They will post their work publicly and provide feedback to peers. Their individual submission is a final document with the summary and lesson plan, following APA style and avoiding plagiarism. Performance will be assessed on a 120-point scale across four criteria: the quality of the summary, lesson plan, feedback provided, and final submission.

Uploaded by

PEDRO RAMOS MACEA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


Course: Didactics of Mathematics
Code: 551032

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric –Task 4 Planning lessons for teaching
Math.

1. Activity Description

Type of activity: Individual


Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
Highest score of the activity: 120 points
The activity starts on: Friday, November The activity ends on: Monday, November
6, 2020 30, 2020
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

Design lesson plans concerning math teaching according to particular and individual context.

The activity consists of:

To propose a lesson plan concerning math teaching according to a particular and individual
context.
-Read.
-Selection of teaching Recommendations.
-Summary.
-Creation of individual lesson plan.
For the development of the activity consider that:
In the Learning Environment, you must:

-Read the suggested bibliography for the Unit 3.


-From the book: “Teaching math to young children: A practice guide” select one of the
suggested teaching Recommendations to develop a lesson plan.
-Post your selection in the collaborative forum, so your classmates know what strategy is
taken. (There has to be only one lesson plan by teaching Recommendation).
-Make and post a summary on the Teaching Recommendations you selected.
-Plan a lesson for teaching Math using the selected recommendation. (for the lesson plan you
can use a template you had from before, or an online tool to create it.)
-Post the Lesson plan in the collaborative forum.
-Give feedback to your classmates according to the selected Teaching Recommendation each
one selected.

1
In the Evaluation Environment, you must:

Deliver one final document that contains the summary of the selected Teaching
Strategy, and a lesson plan design using a specific teaching strategy found in the
suggested reading.

Evidences of individual work:


The individual evidence to be submitted is:
One final document that contains the summary of the selected Teaching
Recommendation, and a lesson plan design using a specific teaching recommendation
found in the suggested reading.
Evidences of collaborative work:

No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Individual evidences, consider the following:


 Post on time your selection of the Teaching strategy you will use to create
your lesson plan. (There has to be only one lesson plan by teaching strategy)
 Create you lesson plan and post it in the collaborative forum to get
recommendations to improve it.
 Give topic centered feedback to your classmates.
 Deliver your lesson plan in the Evaluation Environment after taking into consideration
the recommendations made.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by

2
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:


a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Individual


Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
The highest score in this activity is 110 points
First evaluation High level: The summary is posted on the collaborative forum
criterion: on time. It is complete, and shows full understanding of the
Teaching recommendation.
Summary of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 45 points
individual Teaching and 25 points
Recommendation.
Average level: The summary is posted on the collaborative
This criterion forum. It is complete, and shows understanding of the Teaching
represents 45 recommendation.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 24 points
of 120 points of and 10 points
the activity.
Low level: The summary is not posted on the collaborative
forum. It is not complete, and shows weak understanding of the
Teaching recommendation.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9
points and 0 points
Second evaluation
High level: The lesson plan presents very creative ideas
criterion:
inspired by the selected Teaching recommendation. It is well

3
Lesson Plan. organized, has well designed learning objectives and is planned
according to the stated student´s age and language level.
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 45 points
represents 45 and 25 points
points of the total
of 120 points of Average level: The lesson plan presents ideas inspired by the
the activity. selected Teaching recommendation. It is organized, has learning
objectives and is planned according to the stated student´s age
and language level.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 24 points
and 10 points

Low level: The lesson plan barely presents ideas inspired by


the selected Teaching recommendation. Or there is no lesson
plan presented by the student.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9
points and 0 points
Third evaluation High level: The student posts his/her summary on the
criterion: recommendation on time. The student gives topic centered
feedback to at least two of the other classmates, taking into
Topic Centered account their selection of Teaching Recommendation.
Feedback and If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
Forum Participation. and 10 points

This criterion Average level: The student posts his/her summary on the
represents 15 selected recommendation. There is weak feedback to the other
points of the total classmates. Only gives feedback to one classmate.
of 120 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
the activity. and 5 points

Low level: There is not feedback given to any of the other


classmates.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 4
points and 0 points
Fourth evaluation High level: The final document is delivered in the Evaluation
criterion: environment and it includes: the summary with proper use of
grammar and spelling, the lesson plan taking into account the
Final document. selected Teaching Recommendation from the book, full
references from the material used to design the lesson plan and
the summary.

4
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
represents 15 and 10 points
points of the total
of 120 points of Average level: The final document is delivered in the
the activity. Evaluation Environment includes: the summary, the lesson plan
taking into account the selected Teaching Recommendation from
the book.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
and 5 points

Low level: There is not a final document delivered. Or it does


not include the required information. If your work is at this
level, you can get between 4 points and 0 points

You might also like