DISS Module 3 Week 5
DISS Module 3 Week 5
1
Module 3: Emergence of the Social Sciences
Content Standard
The students demonstrate an understanding of the emergence of the
Social Sciences and the different disciplines key concepts and approaches in
the Social Sciences.
Performance Standard
The learners shall be able to connect the disciplines with their
historical and social foundations
Learning Objectives
Specifically, this module will help you to:
• understand the concepts and principles of Structural-
functionalism, Marxism, and Symbolic Interactionism;
• determine the manifest and latent functions as well as
dysfunctions of social structure;
• analyze social inequalities in terms of class conflict; and
• appraise the meaning that people attach to everyday forms of
interaction in order to explain social behavior
Concept
Social Science Disciplines Table
On the previous lesson, you studied about the introduction and
historical context of the emergence of Social Science disciplines. To test
the knowledge you gained from the lesson, I want you to do the activity
below.
Directions: Write a short definition of the following disciplines and
provide one major event on its history. Use separate sheet of paper for this
activity.
Introduction
The major Social Science theories provides different point of view in
looking into the social world. People may have his/her own perspective or
2
essential viewpoint about the world. But, there are existing theories or
propositions and standards intended to respond to a question or clarify a
specific phenomenon. The sociological theories help us to clarify and
foresee the social world where we live. In this lesson, you will understand
the concepts and principles of the major Social Science theories namely:
Structural-functionalism, Marxism, and Symbolic Interactionism. Also, you
will determine the manifest and latent functions as well as dysfunctions of
social structure. Analyze social inequalities in terms of class conflict and
appraise the meaning that people attach to everyday forms of
interaction in order to explain social behavior.
STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONALISM
3
MARXISM
The starting point of the conflict perspective can be rooted with the
great works of Karl Marx (1818–1883). He proposed that all
social orders experience phases of financial turn of events.
As societies evolve from agricultural to industrial concern
over meeting survival needs is replaced by concern over
making a profit, the hallmark of a capitalist system.
Industrialization prompts the improvement of two classes of
individuals: (1) the bourgeoisie or proprietors of the
methods for creation and (2) the proletariat or laborers
who triumph for compensation. The division of society into two expansive
classes of individuals the "haves" and the "havenots" is valuable to the
proprietors of the methods for creation. The laborers, who may gain just
means compensation, are denied access to the numerous assets
accessible to the rich proprietors. As indicated by Marx, the bourgeoisie
utilize their capacity to control the establishments of society for their
potential benefit. For instance, Marx recommended that religion fills in as
a "sedative of the majority" in that it calms the pain and enduring related
with the average workers way of life and spotlights the laborers'
consideration on other worldliness, God, and existence in the wake of
death instead of on such common worries as day to day environments.
Basically, religion redirects the laborers with the goal that they focus on
being compensated in paradise for carrying on with an ethical life instead
of on scrutinizing their misuse. The conflict perspective sees society as
made out of various gatherings and enthusiasm seeking force and assets.
The conflict perspective clarifies different parts of our social world by
seeing which gatherings have force and advantage from a specific social
game plan. Max Weber (1864-1920) added that there were also
inequalities of social structure and political power that caused struggle.
He noted that various groups were treated differently based on race,
educational, and gender. Relative to this is the normative feminist view
society as a male centric culture—a various levelled arrangement of
association constrained by men. In spite of the fact that there are
numerous assortments of women's activist hypothesis, most would hold
that feminism “demands that existing economic, political, and social
structures be changed” (Weir and Faulkner 2004, p.xii).
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM
Symbolic interactionism mirrors the miniaturized scale sociological
viewpoint, and was to a great extent affected by the works of early
sociologists and scholars such as George Simmel (1858-1918), Charles
Cooley (1864-1929), George Herbert Mead (1863-1931), and Erving
Goffman (1922-1982). Symbolic Interactionism is a theory that centered to
human communication both verbal
and n-verbal and to images, symbols
significance through language and
the manner of individual
understanding. The symbolic
interactionism focuses on the study
of human interaction in which
people make sense of their social
world through exchange of
language and symbols. The establish
4
meanings come from human interactions with others and the society.
These definitions develop their views in life and use it to communicate with
each other. Communicating with one another makes society goes on
and continues. Sociologist W.I. Thomas (1966) highlighted the significance
of definitions and implications in social conduct and its outcomes. He
recommended that humans react to their meaning of a circumstance as
opposed to the objective circumstance itself. Subsequently Thomas
noticed that circumstances that we characterize as genuine becomes
genuine in their outcomes. Representative interactionism additionally
proposes that our personality or feeling of self is formed by social
cooperation. We build up our self-idea by seeing how others collaborate
with us and mark us. By seeing how others see us, we see a reflection
ourselves that Cooley calls the "mirror self."
DISS_Q1_Mod5_Major_Social_Science_Theories.pdf.pdf
Quarter 1: Week 5: Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social science
theories: a. Structural-functionalism b. Marxism c. Symbolic Interactionism
5
Name: ________________________ Date: ______________
Section: _______________________ Score: _____________
Quarter 1: Week 5: Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social science
theories: a. Structural-functionalism b. Marxism c. Symbolic Interactionism
6
Name: ________________________ Date: ______________
Section: _______________________ Score: _____________
Quarter 1: Week 5: Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social science
theories: a. Structural-functionalism b. Marxism c. Symbolic Interactionism
7
Name: ________________________ Date: ______________
Section: _______________________ Score: _____________
Assessment: Directions: Choose the letter of the best answer and write it
on a separate sheet of paper.
Quarter 1: Week 5: Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social science
theories: a. Structural-functionalism b. Marxism c. Symbolic Interactionism
8
Activity Exit: Poster Making
Directions:
1. Use your creativity by drawing a poster reflecting social inequalities in
our society because of class conflict.
2. Write short analysis of your work in a separate sheet.
3. Use long bond paper and any available coloring materials in this
activity
9
Concepts to REMEMBER
Quarter 1: Week 5: Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social science
theories: a. Structural-functionalism b. Marxism c. Symbolic Interactionism
10
REFLECTIVE LEARNING:
MELC: Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social
science theories: Structural-functionalism, Marxism, and Symbolic
Interactionism
Quarter 1: Week 5: Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social science
theories: a. Structural-functionalism b. Marxism c. Symbolic Interactionism
11
12