NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

Adfreezing and frost heaving of foundations

Penner, E.; Burn, K. N.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien
DOI ci-dessous.

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

https://doi.org/10.4224/40000858
Canadian Building Digest, 1970-08

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=8896d31f-b220-4a29-af64-a673b9d4f2da
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=8896d31f-b220-4a29-af64-a673b9d4f2da

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

[email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the
first page of the publication for their contact information.

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez
pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].
Canadian Building Digest
Division of Building Research, National Research Council Canada
CBD 128

Adfreezing and Frost Heaving of

Foundations
Originally published August 1970
E. Penner, K.N. Burn

Please note
This publication is a part of a discontinued series and is archived here as an historical
reference. Readers should consult design and regulatory experts for guidance on the
applicability of the information to current construction practice.

Placing foundation footings below the frost line in frost susceptible soil does not necessarily
ensure that a structure will be protected from damage from frost heaving. Movements in the
soil resulting from ice lens growth can be transmitted to the structure if soil freezes to the
foundation walls or supporting columns. The process is called adfreezing.
This Digest is intended to draw attention to the problem of foundation heave resulting from
adfreezing for such structures as attached garages and carports, basement garages, separate
garages, unheated warehouses, cottages and mechanical and electrical service units sensitive
to differential movements.
The change of soil water to ice when the ground freezes greatly increases the strength of soil,
but this same strengthening process is also responsible for the strong bond (adfreezing) that
may develop between the foundation unit and the soil. During ice lens growth at the frost line
most of the volume change results in an upward displacement of the frozen layer. The upward
thrust of the growing ice lens is transmitted to the foundation unit to which the frozen soil is
bonded by adfreezing. This places stresses on such units, and displacements occur unless the
dead load of the building or other resisting forces exceed the uplift force (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Behaviour of concrete block walls and posts in frost heaving soils.
Adfreezing by itself is not undesirable; it becomes destructive only when it occurs in frost
susceptible (frost heaving) soils and the heaving displacements are transmitted to the
structure. In most cases the amount is not uniform over the whole structure and distortion
occurs. Frequently, also, soil material drops into the cavities produced by the heaving process
so that the structure cannot settle back into its original position. Thus, the problem may get
progressively worse from year to year, increasing the damage to both the foundation and the
superstructure. It is necessary, therefore, to consider the probability of adfreezing and frost
heaving when designing foundations for structures that are not protected from seasonal frost.
Assessment of the probability of encountering such difficulties with a particular structure and
soil requires some appreciation of the frost heaving process (CBD 26). With this understanding
and a means of identifying frost susceptible soils measures can usually be taken during the
planning stage to avoid later trouble.
Adfreeze Strengths and Uplift Forces
Sufficient adfreeze strength studies have not been carried out to give precise field values for all
foundation materials (e.g. concrete, wood, steel) in various soil types. The limited number that
have been determined are used as a general guide only. Adfreeze strengths were determined
by dividing the heaving force measured in the field by the area of contact between the
foundation unit and the frozen soil. The heaving force on 3 ½ -inch diameter steel posts placed
in clay had a maximum value of about 6,000 pounds for two consecutive winters for 3 ½ feet of
frost penetration. This was equivalent to an average adfreeze strength in shear of about 12.5
psi and was a little lower than values determined elsewhere under different soil and climatic
conditions. The maximum adfreeze measured on a concrete block wall was about 10 psi at the
same site.
Information in the literature indicates that adfreeze strength values for wood and concrete are
somewhat less than those for steel, and there is thought to be some dependence on foundation
size and geometry. These factors are currently under study at the Division of Building
Research. At this stage, and to allow for some factor of safety, an adfreeze strength of 18 psi is
used to estimate whether the upward thrust on the foundation will be high enough to lift and
distort the structure. For practical purposes the same adfreeze strength values may be applied
for the various commonly used foundation materials until more detailed information becomes
available. Methods of calculating uplift force and of preventing heave are given in the following
section.
Foundations for Unheated Structures to Prevent Frost Heaving by Adfreezing
Heaving of unheated structures can be avoided by proper foundation design. Different
principles can provide the designer with different methods and the opportunity to select the
most suitable design for a particular structure. Necessarily, it must be consistent with the
primary purpose of sustaining the load of the structure.
The method best understood is based on the principle of separating the foundation wall or
column from the surrounding soil with a drained zone of granular material such as gravel or
crushed stone (Figure 2). In this way the uplift forces generated in the frost heaving soil are
not transmitted to the foundation but lost in shear in the granular zone. This zone must be well
drained or the granular material will freeze into a solid mass. If this occurs any heaving forces
outside the granular layer will be transmitted to the foundation and cause uplift and distortion
of the structure.

Figure 2. Drained gravel backfill around column or foundation wall.

A second method uses anchored columns or walls to resist the uplift forces generated by frost
heaving of soil that is bonded by adfreezing to the sides of the foundation. A schematic drawing
illustrates this principle (Figure 3). Uplift force may be estimated from adfreeze strength,
expected depth of frost penetration, and the perimeter of the column or wall as follows:
U= d x p x f
where= uplift force,
U= depth of frost,
d= perimeter of
pcolumn or wall,
f= adfreeze
strength.
 Figure 3. Anchored column (e.g. wood, steel, concrete).
The uplift force, U, will place the layer of unfrozen soil, D - d, between the frost line and the top
of the footing in compression. From load-compressibility characteristics of the backfill at the
density at which it is replaced, and from depth of frost penetration, depth of footing and
permissible heave (upward movement) of the column or wall for a given structure an estimate
can be made of the footing area required to give satisfactory anchorage.
Several aspects of this method should be emphasized.

1. For isolated supports, the more slender the column in the frozen layer the smaller the area of
adfreezing and hence the lower the uplift force.
2. Good compaction of the backfill will reduce compression of the unfrozen layer and accompanying
heave.
3. The soil must not freeze down to the top of the footing. Should this occur there would be no
resistance to heave.

Experimental foundations in Leda clay at Ottawa, consisting of 3 ½ -inch diameter steel piles
anchored to reinforced concrete footings 2 feet by 2 feet by ¾ foot and placed at a depth of 5-
¾ feet, have heaved only 0.02 feet for a measured heave force of 6,000 pounds. The depth of
frost was about 3-¾ feet. The maximum compressive stress placed on the unfrozen layer by
frost heaving was calculated to be approximately ¾ ton/foot2. This stress would normally cause
little compression in well compacted, unfrozen backfill.
A third method makes use of non-wettable insulation such as foamed polystyrene board to
prevent freezing of the frost susceptible soil in contact with the column or foundation wall. For
best protection, the insulation should be placed horizontally, adjacent to the foundation. It
should be buried a sufficient depth below the ground surface to prevent crushing by traffic, but
shallow enough to avoid adfreezing problems above it.
The thickness of the required insulation depends on the severity of the climate. For insulation
with a thermal conductivity of 0.25 Btu in./ft 2 hr °F, 1 inch thickness of insulation per 1,000
degree-days of freezing is normally sufficient in snow-cleared areas. On this basis, for example,
about 2 inches would be required in Ottawa, ¾ inch in Halifax, and 3 ½ inches in Saskatoon.
The width of the insulated strip next to the foundation wall or column should be approximately
equal to the expected depth of frost penetration. Exposed foundation walls might also have to
be insulated to prevent frost entry and to obtain maximum protection.
Other methods of preventing frost grip on foundation units have been investigated: applying a
lubricant to columns, or applying lubricant and wrapping columns with building paper. These
are temporary measures only, and usually require extensive maintenance after a few winters.
Heated Basements
Adfreezing of soil rarely occurs on uninsulated foundation walls of heated basements because
of heat losses to the surrounding soil. Figure 4 shows the thermal regime around such a
structure. Even under severe winter conditions the 32 °F isotherm does not intercept the
foundation wall if the basement temperature is sufficiently high. Difficulties of frost heaving are
avoided, even though the soil used for backfill may be potentially frost susceptible. If heat loss
from the basement area is reduced to the point where the soil in contact with the wall freezes,
difficulties may be encountered. Adfreezing may be induced if an excessive thickness of
insulation is applied to the inside of exterior foundation walls, or if heat is excluded from certain
areas of the basement, as for cold cellars.
 Figure 4. Measured ground temperature isotherms for 27 January 1956 at Prairie Regional
Station, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Drive-Down Basement Garages
Frost heaving of the sill across the entrance of drive-down garages is frequently encountered
where the soils are frost susceptible, even when footings are placed below frost depth. This
situation is given special attention because it is such a common problem. Causes of damage
vary with differences in design detail, but they can usually be traced to a combination of the
following factors:

1. a readily available water supply; the entrance is below street level and thus closer to the water
table or below it:
2. frost susceptible soils used as backfill, both inside and outside the foundation wall at the garage
entrance;
3. maximum frost penetration because the driveway is snow cleared:
4. gravel backfill not drained properly and uplift of adjacent soil transmitted to the foundation wall;
5. garage temperatures too low to keep soils from freezing around the entrance.

Figure 5 shows frost susceptible soil next to the foundation wall under the sill and heaving
difficulties encountered because of adfreezing. The design and construction principles
recommended under these conditions are given in the schematic drawing in Figure 6. It is
important that clean gravel or crushed rock backfill be used on both sides of the foundation
wall at the garage entrance.
Figure 5. Frost heave and damage around entrance of basement garage.

Figure 6. Suggested method of preventing frost damage to basement garage.

The footing depth must be lower than the expected frost penetration and drain tiles should be
placed adjacent to the footings. Where the footing below the garage door is lower than the
remainder of the foundation, special arrangements should be made for draining water away
from it. This is absolutely necessary if heaving problems are to be avoided.