0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views8 pages

ECE438 - Laboratory 4a: Sampling and Reconstruction of Continuous-Time Signals

This document describes an experiment on sampling and reconstructing continuous-time signals in a digital signal processing system. It discusses: 1) How continuous-time signals must be sampled and quantized to be processed by a computer, forming a digital signal. 2) How sampling is done by measuring the signal value at time intervals Ts. This can cause distortions like aliasing if the sampling rate is too low. 3) How reconstruction works by converting the digital signal back to analog, and how it is affected by the sample-and-hold process used in digital-to-analog converters. The document provides equations to analyze the frequency content and distortions from sampling, reconstruction, and sample-and-hold

Uploaded by

jomer_juan14
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views8 pages

ECE438 - Laboratory 4a: Sampling and Reconstruction of Continuous-Time Signals

This document describes an experiment on sampling and reconstructing continuous-time signals in a digital signal processing system. It discusses: 1) How continuous-time signals must be sampled and quantized to be processed by a computer, forming a digital signal. 2) How sampling is done by measuring the signal value at time intervals Ts. This can cause distortions like aliasing if the sampling rate is too low. 3) How reconstruction works by converting the digital signal back to analog, and how it is affected by the sample-and-hold process used in digital-to-analog converters. The document provides equations to analyze the frequency content and distortions from sampling, reconstruction, and sample-and-hold

Uploaded by

jomer_juan14
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Purdue University: ECE438 - Digital Signal Processing with Applications 1

ECE438 - Laboratory 4a:


Sampling and Reconstruction
of Continuous-Time Signals
By Prof. Charles Bouman and Prof. Mireille Boutin
Fall 2016

1 Introduction
It is often desired to analyze and process continuous-time signals using a computer. However, in
order to process a continuous-time signal, it must first be digitized. This means that the
continuous-time signal must be sampled and quantized, forming a digital signal that can be
stored in a computer. Analog systems can be converted to their discrete-time counterparts, and
these digital systems then process discrete-time signals to produce discrete-time out- puts. The
digital output can then be converted back to an analog signal, or reconstructed, through a digital-
to-analog converter. Figure 1 illustrates an example, containing the three general components
described above: a sampling system, a digital signal processor, and a reconstruction system.
When designing such a system, it is essential to understand the effects of the sampling and
reconstruction processes. Sampling and reconstruction may lead to different types of distortion,
including low-pass filtering, aliasing, and quantization. The system designer must insure that
these distortions are below acceptable levels, or are compensated through additional processing.

x(t) Sampling DSP Reconstruction


y(n) z(n) s(t)
System Processor System

Figure 1: Example of a typical digital signal processing system.

Questions or comments concerning this laboratory should be directed to Prof. Mireille Boutin, School of
Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette IN 47907
1.1 Sampling Overview
Sampling is simply the process of measuring the value of a continuous-time signal at certain
instants of time. Typically, these measurements are uniformly separated by the sampling period,
Ts. If x(t) is the input signal, then the sampled signal, y[n], is as follows:

y[n] = x(t)|t=nTs .
A critical question is the following: What sampling period, Ts, is required to accurately
represent the signal x(t)? To answer this question, we need to look at the frequency domain
representations of y[n] and x(t). Since y[n] is a discrete-time signal, we represent its fre-
quency content with the discrete-time Fourier transform (DTFT), Y (ejω). However, x(t) is a
continuous-time signal, requiring the use of the continuous-time Fourier transform (CTFT),
denoted as X(f ). Fortunately, Y (ω) can be written in terms of X(f ):
Y (ω) = 1 X(f )|f = ω−2πk

Σ∞
Ts k=−∞ 2πTs

.
Σ∞
=1 . (1)
Σ
ω − 2πk
Ts k=−∞ X 2πTs
Consistent with the properties of the DTFT, Y (ω) is periodic with a period 2π. It is
formed by rescaling the amplitude and frequency of X(f ), and then repeating it in frequency
every 2π. The critical issue of the relationship in (1) is the frequency content of X(f ). If X(f
) has frequency components that are above 1/(2Ts), the repetition in frequency will cause
these components to overlap with (i.e. add to) the components below 1/(2Ts). This causes an
unrecoverable distortion, known as aliasing, that will prevent a perfect reconstruction of X(f
). We will illustrate this later in the lab. The 1/(2Ts) “cutoff frequency” is known as the
Nyquist frequency.
To prevent aliasing, most sampling systems first low pass filter the incoming signal to ensure
that its frequency content is below the Nyquist frequency. In this case, Y (ω) can be related to
X(f ) through the k = 0 term in (1):
. Σ
Y (ω) = 1 X ω
Ts 2πTs for ω ∈ [−π, π] .

Here, it is understood that Y (e ) is periodic with period 2π. Note in this expression that
Y (ejω) and X(f ) are related by a simple scaling of the frequency and magnitude axes. Also
note that ω = π in Y (ejω) corresponds to the Nyquist frequency, f = 1/(2Ts) in X(f ).
Sometimes after the sampled signal has been digitally processed, it must then converted back
to an analog signal. Theoretically, this can be done by converting the discrete-time signal to a
sequence of continuous-time impulses that are weighted by the sample values. If this continuous-
time “impulse train” is filtered with an ideal low pass filter, with a cutoff frequency equal to the
Nyquist frequency, a scaled version of the original low pass filtered signal will result. The
spectrum of the reconstructed signal S(f
. ) is given by
Y (2πf T ) for |f | < 1
S(f ) = 2Ts (2)
s

0 otherwise.
1.2 Sampling and Reconstruction Using Sample-and-Hold

Nth order Butterworth Sampling Process Nth order Butterworth


LP Filter with cutoff with Sample Time Ts, LP filter with cutoff
frequency of Fc and Zero Order Hold frequency of Fc

Figure 2: Sampling and reconstruction using a sample-and-hold.


In practice, signals are reconstructed using digital-to-analog converters. These devices work
by reading the current sample, and generating a corresponding output voltage for a period of Ts
seconds. The combined effect of sampling and D/A conversion may be thought of as a single
sample-and-hold device. Unfortunately, the sample-and-hold process distorts the frequency
spectrum of the reconstructed signal. In this section, we will analyze the effects of using a zeroth-
order sample-and-hold in a sampling and reconstruction system. Later in the laboratory, we will
see how the distortion introduced by a sample-and-hold process may be reduced through the use
of discrete-time interpolation.
Figure 2 illustrates a system with a low-pass input filter, a sample-and-hold device, and a
low-pass output filter. If there were no sampling, this system would simply be two analog
filters in cascade. We know the frequency response for this simpler system. Any differences
between this and the frequency response for the entire system is a result of the sampling and
reconstruction. Our goal is to compare the two frequency responses using Matlab. For this
analysis, we will assume that the filters are Nth order Butterworth filters with a cutoff
frequency of fc, and that the sample-and-hold runs at a sampling rate of fs = 1/Ts.
We will start the analysis by first examining the ideal case. Consider replacing the sample-
and-hold with an ideal impulse generator, and assume that instead of the Butterworth filters we
use perfect low-pass filters with a cutoff of fc. After analyzing this case we will modify the
results to account for the sample-and-hold and Butterworth filter roll-off.
If an ideal impulse generator is used in place of the sample-and-hold, then the frequency
spectrum of the impulse train can be computed by combining the sampling equation (1) with the
reconstruction equation (2).
S(f ) = Y (2πf Ts)
. Σ
Σ∞
=1 2πf
X
Ts − 2πk
Ts k=−∞ 2πTs
1
1
X (f − kfs) , for |f | ≤ .
Σ∞ 2T
= T
s k=−∞ s
1
.
2Ts
S(f ) = 0 for |f | >
If we assume that fs > 2fc, then the infinite sum reduces to one term. In this case, the
reconstructed signal is given by
1
S(f ) = X (f ) . (3)
Ts
Notice that the reconstructed signal is scaled by the factor 1 .
Ts
Of course, the sample-and-hold does not generate perfect impulses. Instead it generates a
pulse of width Ts, and magnitude equal to the input sample. Therefore, the new signal out of the
sample-and-hold is equivalent to the old signal (an impulse train) convolved with
. Σ
the pulse t 1
p(t) = rect − .
Ts 2
Convolution in the time domain is equivalent to multiplication in the frequency domain, so this
convolution with p(t) is equivalent to multiplying by the Fourier transform P (f ) where

|P (f )| = Ts|sinc(f/fs)| . (4)
Finally, the magnitude of the frequency response of the N-th order Butterworth filter is
given by
1
. ΣN . (5)
f
|Hb(f )| = 1 + fc
We may calculate the complete magnitude response of the sample-and-hold system by
combining the effects of the Butterworth filters in equation (5), the ideal sampling system in
equation (3), and the sample-and-hold pulse width in equation (4). This yields the final
expression 1
|H(f )| = |Hb(f )P (f )
Ts Hb(f )|
 2
 1  |sinc(f/f )| .
=
 . ΣN  s
1 + ff
Notice that the expression |sinc(f/f s
frequencies close to the Nyquist rate.)| produces a roll-off
Generally,
c
in frequency
this roll-off which will attenuate
is not desirable.

INLAB REPORT:
Do the following using Ts = 1 sec, fc = 0.45 Hz, and N = 20. Use Matlab to produce the plots
(magnitude only), for frequencies in the range: f = -1:0.001:1.
• Compute and plot the magnitude response of the system in Figure 2 without the sample-
and-hold device.

• Compute and plot the magnitude response of the complete system in Figure 2.
• Comment
response ofonthe
thesample-and-hold
shape of the twoaffect
magnitude responses.
the design How might
considerations of the magnitude
a high quality audio
CD player?
2 Simulink Overview

Full Block Library

Simulink Blocks

Upsampler Impulse Analog Butterworth Spectrum Network Scope


Generator LP Filter1 Analyzer Analyzer

Sampling and Reconstruction Using an Inpulse


Sampling
Generator
and Reconstruction Using a Sample and Hold
Discrete Time Interpolator

Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 3

Figure 3: Simulink utilities for lab 4.

In this lab we will use Simulink to simulate the effects of the sampling and reconstruction
processes. Simulink treats all signals as continuous-time signals. This means that “sampled”
signals are really just continuous-time signals that contain a series of finite-width pulses. The
height of each of these pulses is the amplitude of the input signal at the beginning of the pulse. In
other words, both the sampling action and the zero-order-hold reconstruction are done at the
same time; the discrete-time signal itself is never generated. This means that the impulse-
generator block is really a “pulse-generator”, or zero-order-hold device. Remember that, in
Simulink, frequency spectra are computed on continuous-time signals. This is why many aliased
components will appear in the spectra.

3 Sampling and Reconstruction with an Impulse


Gen- erator
Help on Simulink
Help on printing figures in Simulink
DownloadLab4Utilities.zip

In this section, we will experiment with the sampling and reconstruction of signals using a
pulse generator. This pulse generator is the combination of an ideal impulse generator and a
perfect zero-order-hold device.
In order to run the experiment, first download the required Lab4Utilities. Once Matlab is
started, type “Lab4”. A set of Simulink blocks and experiments will come up as shown in Fig 3.

Signal Impulse
Generator Spectrum
Generator
Analyzer

Mux

Mux
Scope

Figure 4: Simulink model for sampling and reconstruction using an impulse generator.
Before starting this experiment, use the MATLAB command close all to close all figures
other than the Simulink windows. Double click on the icon named Sampling and Reconstruc-
tion Using An Impulse Generator to bring up the first experiment as shown in Figure 4. In this
experiment, a sine wave is sampled at a frequency of 1 Hz; then the sampled discrete- time signal
is used to generate rectangular impulses of duration 0.3 sec and amplitude equal to the sample
values. The block named Impulse Generator carries out both the sampling of the sine wave and
its reconstruction with pulses. A single Scope is used to plot both the input and output of the
impulse generator, and a Spectrum Analyzer is used to plot the output pulse train and its
spectrum.
First, run the simulation with the frequency of input sine wave set to 0.1 Hz (initial setting of
the experiment). Let the simulation run until it terminates to get an accurate plot of the output
frequencies. Then print the output of Scope and the Spectrum Analyzer. Be sure to label your
plots.

INLAB REPORT:
Submit the plot of the input/output signals and the plot of the output signal and its frequency
spectrum. On the plot of the spectrum of the reconstructed signal, circle the aliases, i.e. the
components that do NOT correspond to the input sine wave.

Ideal impulse functions can only be approximated. In the initial setup, the pulse width is 0.3
sec, which is less then the sampling period of 1 sec. Try setting the pulse width to
0.1 sec and run the simulation. Print the output of the Spectrum Analyzer.

INLAB REPORT:
Submit the plot of the output frequency spectrum for a pulse width of 0.1 sec. Indicate on your
plot what has changed and explain why.

Set the pulse width back to 0.3 sec and change the frequency of the sine wave to 0.8 Hz.
Run the simulation and print the output of the Scope and the Spectrum Analyzer.
Network
Analyzer

Analog Butterworth Analog Butterworth


LP Filter1 LP Filter 2
Sample−and−Hold

Scope1 Scope2 Scope3 Scope4

Figure 5: Initial Simulink model for sampling and reconstruction using a sample-and-hold. This
system only measures the frequency response of the analog filters.

INLAB REPORT:
Submit the plot of the input/output signals and the plot of the output signal and its fre- quency
spectrum. On the frequency plot, label the frequency peak that corresponds to the lowest
frequency (the fundamental component) of the output signal. Explain why the lowest frequency
is no longer the same as the frequency of the input sinusoid.

Leave the input frequency at 0.8 Hz. Now insert a filter right after the impulse generator. Use
a 10th order Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.5 Hz. Connect the output of the filter
to the Spectrum Analyzer and the Mux. Run the simulation, and print the output of Scope and the
Spectrum Analyzer.

INLAB REPORT:
Submit the plot of the input/output signals and the plot of the output signal and its frequency
spectrum. Explain why the output signal has the observed frequency spectrum.

4 Sampling and Reconstruction with Sample and Hold

Help on printing figures in Simulink

In this section, we will sample a continuous-time signal using a sample-and-hold and then
reconstruct it. We already know that a sample-and-hold followed by a low-pass filter does not
result in perfect reconstruction. This is because a sample-and-hold acts like a pulse generator
with a pulse duration of one sampling period. This “pulse shape” of the sample-and-hold is what
distorts the frequency spectrum (see Sec 1.2).
To start the second experiment, double click on the icon named Sampling and Recon-
struction Using A Sample and Hold. Figure 5 shows the initial setup for this exercise. It contains
4 Scopes to monitor the processing done in the sampling and reconstruction system. It also
contains a Network Analyzer for measuring the frequency response and the impulse response of
the system.
The Network Analyzer works by generating a weighted chirp signal (shown on Scope 1) as an
input to the system-under-test. The frequency spectrum of this chirp signal is known. The
analyzer then measures the frequency content of the output signal (shown on Scope 4). The
transfer function is formed by computing the ratio of the output frequency spectrum to the input
spectrum. The inverse Fourier transform of this ratio, which is the impulse response of the
system, is then computed.
In the initial setup, the Sample-and-Hold and Scope 3 are not connected. There is no sampling
in this system, just two cascaded low-pass filters. Run the simulation and observe the signals on
the Scopes. Wait for the simulation to end.

INLAB REPORT:
Submit the figure containing plots of the magnitude response, the phase response, and the
impulse response of this system. Use the tall mode to obtain a larger printout by typing
orient(’tall’) directly before you print.

Double-click the Sample-and-Hold and set its Sample time to 1. Now, insert the Sample-
and-Hold in between the two filters and connect Scope 3 to its output. Run the simulation and
observe the signals on the Scopes.

INLAB REPORT:
Submit the figure containing plots of the magnitude response, the phase response, and the
impulse response of this system. Explain the reason for the difference in the shape of this
magnitude response versus the previous magnitude response. Give an analytical expression for
the behavior of the magnitude plot for frequencies below 0.45 Hz.

You might also like