Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 175 views

    Basement Masonry Wall Design Based On TMS 402-16/13: Input Data & Design Summary

    Uploaded by

    Ridho Ziska
    The document summarizes the design of a basement masonry wall based on code requirements. Input data includes soil properties, surcharge loads, rebar specifications. Three analysis cases are considered: fixed bottom/pinned top under lateral soil pressure; and pinned bottom/top under trapezoidal soil pressure. The wall design is found to be adequate for flexure, minimum horizontal reinforcement, and shear capacity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Basement Masonry Wall Design Based On TMS 402-16/13: Input Data & Design Summary

    Uploaded by

    Ridho Ziska
    175 views2 pages
    The document summarizes the design of a basement masonry wall based on code requirements. Input data includes soil properties, surcharge loads, rebar specifications. Three analysis cases are considered: fixed bottom/pinned top under lateral soil pressure; and pinned bottom/top under trapezoidal soil pressure. The wall design is found to be adequate for flexure, minimum horizontal reinforcement, and shear capacity.

    Original Description:

    basemenmsonry

    Original Title

    BasementMasonryWall

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes the design of a basement masonry wall based on code requirements. Input data includes soil properties, surcharge loads, rebar specifications. Three analysis cases are considered: fixed bottom/pinned top under lateral soil pressure; and pinned bottom/top under trapezoidal soil pressure. The wall design is found to be adequate for flexure, minimum horizontal reinforcement, and shear capacity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    175 views2 pages

    Basement Masonry Wall Design Based On TMS 402-16/13: Input Data & Design Summary

    Uploaded by

    Ridho Ziska
    The document summarizes the design of a basement masonry wall based on code requirements. Input data includes soil properties, surcharge loads, rebar specifications. Three analysis cases are considered: fixed bottom/pinned top under lateral soil pressure; and pinned bottom/top under trapezoidal soil pressure. The wall design is found to be adequate for flexure, minimum horizontal reinforcement, and shear capacity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    PROJECT : PAGE :

    CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
    JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
    Basement Masonry Wall Design Based on TMS 402-16/13
    INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
    SPECIAL INSPECTION ( 0=NO, 1=YES ) 1 Yes
    TYPE OF MASONRY ( 1=CMU, 2=BRICK ) 1 CMU
    MASONRY STRENGTH fm' = 1.5 ksi
    REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
    LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE Pa = 40 pcf (equivalent fluid pressure)
    BACKFILL SPECIFIC WEIGHT gb = 110 pcf
    SURCHARGE WEIGHT ws = 100 psf
    WALL LATERAL FORCE, ASD wLat = 25 psf
    SERVICE GRAVITY LOAD P = 20 kips / ft
    ECCENTRICITY e = 6 in
    SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING PE = 20 psf / ft
    HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND H1 = 1.4 ft
    HEIGHT UNDER GROUND H2 = 12 ft
    THICKNESS OF WALL t = 12 in
    WALL VERT. REINF. (As) # 8 @ 8 in o.c.
    As LOCATION (1=at middle, 2=at each face) 2 at each face
    WALL HORIZ. REINF. 2 # 4 @ 32 in o.c.

    [THE WALL DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]

    ANALYSIS
    Case A: Fixed Bottom & Pinned Top, with Lateral Soil Pressure Increasing Uniformly to Bottom
    SERVICE LOADS
    Hb = 0.5 Pa H22 = 2.88 kips / ft
    H s = w s P a H 2 / gb = 0.44 kips / ft
    HLat = wLat (H1 + H2) = 0.34 kips / ft
    HE = 0.5 PE (H2)2 = 1.44 kips / ft
    W w = t ( H 1 + H 2 ) gm = 1.74 kips / ft
    ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN LOADS
    gHb = 1.0 Hb = 2.88 kips / ft
    gHs = 1.0 Hs = 0.44 kips / ft
    gHLat = 1.0 HLat = 0.34 kips / ft
    gHE = 1.0 HE = 1.44 kips / ft
    gWw = 1.0 Ww = 1.74 kips / ft
    gP = 1.0 P = 20.00 kips / ft
    DETERMINE FACTORED SECTION FORCES

    RT = 2.51 kips / ft
    RB = 2.58 kips / ft
    PB = 21.74 kips / ft
    MB = 4.21 ft-kips / ft
    S = 6.72 ft, at max moment
    PM = 20.87 kips / ft
    MM = 0.18 ft-kips / ft
    (cont'd)
    Case B: Pinned both Bottom & Top, with Lateral Soil Pressure Trapezium Distributed

    L = 0.6 H2
    Hb = 0.92 kips / ft
    gHb = 0.92 kips / ft
    RT = 2.38 kips / ft
    RB = 0.75 kips / ft
    S = 3.46 ft, at max moment
    PM = 21.29 kips / ft
    MM = 2.98 ft-kips / ft

    CHECK MINIMUN HORIZ. REINF.


    r ProvD = 0.001042
    > rMIN = 0.0007
    (TMS 402 5.2.2.4)
    [Satisfactory]

    CHECK VERT. FLEXURE CAPACITY (TMS 402 8.3.3)


    rProvD = 0.010395 > rSUM = 0.0010 (horizontal and vertical at least 0.002, TMS 402 5.2.2.4)
    > rMIN = 0.0007 (TMS 402 5.2.2.4)
    [Satisfactory]

    1  kd   te   kd   t e kd  
    M m  MIN  b wkd F b  d    P  d   , AsF s  d    P     , allowable moment
     2  3   2   3   2 3 
    where
    Loads Case A Case B As = 1.185 in2 Es = 29000 ksi
    at bottom at middle d= 9.130 in n = 21.5
    P 21.74 20.87 21.29 bw = 12 in r = 0.01082

    M 4.21 0.18 2.98 te = 11.63 in SF = 1.33


    Mm 5.23 5.47 5.36 Em = 1350 ksi k = 0.4878
    Fb = 0.66 ksi Fs = 32 ksi
    [Satisfactory]

    CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (TMS 402 8.3.6)

     Max. Horiz. Shear 


    fv  18.5 psi, at bottom
    b wt e
    < F v   SF  1.125  f
    '
    m  58.1 psi [Satisfactory]

    You might also like