Module 1: Philosophical Thoughts On Education: Unit I: Educational Foundation
This document summarizes the philosophical thoughts on education of John Locke, Herbert Spencer, and John Dewey in 3 paragraphs.
For John Locke, education involves acquiring knowledge through the senses and interacting with the environment. It also means seeing citizens participate actively in their government. Herbert Spencer favored a utilitarian education focused on practical subjects to help survival. He believed individual competition leads to social progress. John Dewey saw education as a social process where children explore their environment and gain control through experience. Schools should introduce children to society and cultural heritage through a democratic process.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
516 views9 pages
Module 1: Philosophical Thoughts On Education: Unit I: Educational Foundation
This document summarizes the philosophical thoughts on education of John Locke, Herbert Spencer, and John Dewey in 3 paragraphs.
For John Locke, education involves acquiring knowledge through the senses and interacting with the environment. It also means seeing citizens participate actively in their government. Herbert Spencer favored a utilitarian education focused on practical subjects to help survival. He believed individual competition leads to social progress. John Dewey saw education as a social process where children explore their environment and gain control through experience. Schools should introduce children to society and cultural heritage through a democratic process.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9
Unit I: Educational Foundation
Module 1: Philosophical Thoughts on Education
Introduction: Most lessons are devoted to teacher asking low-level questions and students answering with what they memorized the night before. Teacher deposited these facts a day before and withdraws them the next day. A perfect example of the banking system of education that Paulo Freire is very much against as it does not make the learner reflect and connect what he/she was taught in real life. Outcome: 1. You should be able to discuss at least 6 Philosophical Thoughts on Education
Isolation Facts and the Banking Method
We have nothing against facts. But isolated facts make no sense but become meaningful when seen in relation to other facts. These facts when combined with other facts (with further questioning from the teacher) help the learner see meaning and connection to his/her life. Example: The pupil learned that food is broken down into small pieces, which is digested by the stomach and is absorbed by the intestine. To connect the facts, teacher should ask more questions life: “What is the food is not chewed in the month, what happens to food in the stomach and to the stomach itself? What is the stomach fails to digest food from the mouth, what happens to the food in the small intestines? Will the small intestines be able to absorb food, etc? . . .” Below are summaries of thoughts of education philosophers on what should be taught and how learners should be taught. A. John Locke (1632-1704): The Empiricist Educator
Acquire knowledge about the world through the senses –
learning by doing and by interacting with the environment. Simple ideas become more complex through comparison, reflection, and generalization – the inductive method. Questioned the long traditional view that knowledge came exclusively from literary sources, particularly the Greek and Latin classes. Opposed he “divine right of kings” theory which held that the monarch had the right to be an unquestioned and absolute ruler over his subjects. Political order should be based upon a contract between the people and the government. Aristocrats are not destined by birth to be rulers. People were to establish their own government and select their own political leaders from among themselves; civic education is necessary. People should be educated to govern themselves intelligently and responsibly (Ornstein, 1984). Comments:
For John Lock education is acquisition of knowledge
contained in the Great Books. It is learners interacting with concrete experience, comparing and reflecting on the same concrete experience. The learner is an active not a passive agent of his/her own learning. From the social dimension, education is seeing citizens participate actively and intelligently in establishing their government and in choosing who will govern them from among themselves because they are convinced that no one person is destined to be ruler forever. B. Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) Utilitarian Education
Spencer’s concept of “survival of the fittest” means that
human development had gone through an evolutionary series of stages from the simple to the complex and from the uniform to the more specialized kind of activity. Social development had taken place according to an evolutionary process by which simple homogeneous societies had evolved to more complex societal systems characterized with humanistic and classical education. Industrialized society require vocational and professional education based on scientific and practical (utilitarian) objectives rather than on the very general educational goals associated with humanistic and classical education. Curriculum should emphasize the practical, utilitarian and scientific subjects that help human kind master the environment. Was not inclined to rote learning; schooling must be related to life and to the activities needed to earn a living. Curriculum must be arranged according to their contribution to human survival and progress. Science and other subjects that sustained human life and prosperity should have curricular priority since it aids in the performance of life activities. Individual competition leads to social progress. He who is fittest survives. (Ornstein, 1984). Comments: Specialized Education of Spencer vs. General Education
To survive in a complex society, Spencer favors specialized
education over that of general education. We are in need of social engineers who can combine harmoniously the findings of specialized knowledge. This is particularly true in the field of medicine. The expert who concentrates on a limited field is useful, but if he loses sight of the interdependence of things, he becomes a man who knows more and more about less and less. We must be warned of the deadly peril of over specialism. Of course, we do not prefer the other extreme, the superficial person who knows less and less about more and more. Spencer’s Survival of the Fittest
He who is the fittest survives. Individual competition leads
to social progress. The competition in class is what advocates of whole-child approach and Socio-emotional Learning (SEL) atmosphere negate. The whole child approach a powerful tool for SEL-focus schools has a tenets – “each student learns in an environment that is physically and emotionally safe for students and adults” and “each student has access to personalized learning and is supported by qualified and caring adults . . . “ (Frey, N. 2019). The highlighted words point to no competition for competition works against an emotionally safe environment. C. John Dewey (1859-1952): Learning through Experience
Education is a social process and so school is intimately
related to the society that it serves. Children are socially active human beings who want to explore their environment and gain control over it. Education is a social process by which the immature members of the group, especially the children, are brought to participate in the society. The school is a special environment established by members of society, for the purpose of simplifying, purifying and integrating the social experience of the group so that it can be understood, examined and used by its children. The sole purpose of education is to contribute to the personal and social growth of individuals. The steps of the scientific or reflective method which are extremely important in Dewey’s educational theory are as follows: The learner has a “genuine situation of experience” – involvement in an activity in which he/she is interest. Within this experience the learner has a “genuine problem” that stimulates thinking. The learner possesses the information or does research to acquire the information needed to solve the problem. The learner develops possible and tentative solutions that may solve the problem. The learner tests the solutions by applying them to the problem. In this one way one discovers their validity for oneself. The fund of knowledge of the human race-past ideas, discoveries and inventions have to be used as the material for dealing with problems. This accumulated wisdom of cultural heritage has to be tested. If it served human purposes, it becomes part of a reconstructed experience. The school is social, scientific and democratic. The school introduces children to society and their heritage. The school as a miniature society is a means of bringing children into social participation. The school is scientific in the sense that it is a social laboratory in which children and youth could test their ideas and values. In here, the learner acquires the disposition and procedures associated with scientific or reflective thinking and acting. The school is democratic because the learner is free to test all ideas, beliefs and values. Cultural heritage, customs and institutions are all subject to critical inquiry, investigation and reconstruction. School should be used by all, it being a democratic institution. No barrier of custom or prejudice segregate people. People ought to work together to solve common problems. The authoritarian or coercive style of administration and teaching is out of place because they block genuine inquiry and dialogue. Education is a social activity and the school is a social agency that helps shape human character and behavior. Values are relative but sharing, cooperation, and democracy are significant human values that should be encouraged by schools. (Ornstein, A. 1984). Comments: The Fund Knowledge of the Human Race
Dewey does not disregard the accumulated wisdom of the past.
These past ideas, discoveries and inventions, our cultural heritage, will be used as the material for dealing with problems and so will be tested. If they are of help, they become part of a reconstructed experience. If they are not totally accurate, they will still be part of a reconstructed experience. This means that the ideal learner for Dewey is not just one who can learn by doing, e.g., conduct an experiment but one who can connect accumulated wisdom of the past to the present. Schools are For the People and By the People
Schools are democratic institutions where everyone
regardless of age, ethnicity, social status is welcome and is encouraged to participate in the democratic process of decision-making. Learners and stakeholders practice and experience democracy in schools. D. George Counts (1889-1974): Building a New Social Order
Education is not based on eternal truths but is relative to
a particular society living at a given time and place. By allying themselves with groups that want to change society, schools should cope with social change that arises from technology. There is a cultural lag between material progress and social institutions and ethical values. Instruction should incorporate a content of a socially useful nature and a problem-solving methodology. Students are encouraged to work on problems that have social significance. Schools become instrument for social improvement rather than an agency for preserving the status quo. Teachers should lead society rather than follow it. Teachers are agents of change. Teachers are called on to make important choices in the controversial areas of economics, politics and morality because if they failed to do so, others would make the decisions for them. Schools ought to provide an education that afford equal learning opportunities to all students. (Ornstein, A. 1984) Comments: Schools and Teachers are Agents of Change
For George Counts, schools and teachers should be agents of
change. Schools are considered instruments for social improvement rather than as agencies for preserving the status quo. Whatever change we work for should always be change for the better not just change for the sake of change. Teachers are called to make decisions on controversial issues. Not to make a decision is not actually making a decision. Like Dewey, problem solving, should be the dominant method for instruction. Lag Between Material Progress and Ethical Values Counts asserts that “there is a cultural lag between material progress and social institutions and ethical values.” Material progress of humankind is very evident but moral and ethical development seem to have lagged behind. A friend once wrote: “The Egyptians had their horses. Modern man has his jets but today it is still the same moral problems that plague humankind.” Indeed, with science and technology, we have become very powerful and yet powerless. We have conquered a number of diseases and even postponed death for many, we have conquered aging, the planets, the seas but we have not conquered ourselves. E. Theodore Brameld (1904-1987) Social Reconstructionism
As the name implies, social reconstruction is a philosophy
that emphasizes the reformation of society. The social reconstructionist contends that: . . . humankind has moved from an agricultural and rural society to an urban and technological society . . . there is a serious lag in cultural adaptation to the realities of a technological society. Humankind has yet to reconstruct its values in order to catch up with the changes in the technological order, and organized education has a major role in play in reducing the gap between the values of the culture and technology. (Ornstein, 1984).
So the social reconstructionist asserts that schools should
critically examine present culture and resolve inconsistencies, controversies and conflicts to build a new society not just change society . . . do more than reform the social and educational status quo. It should seek to create a new society . . . Humankind is in a state of profound cultural crisis. If schools reflect the dominant social values . . . then organized education will merely transmit the social ills that are symptoms of the pervasive problems and afflictions that beset humankind. . . The only legitimate goal of a truly human education is to create a world order in which people are in control of their won destiny. In an era of nuclear weapons, the social reconstructionists see an urgent need for society to reconstruct itself before it destroys itself. (Ornstein, A. 1984) Technological era is an era of of interdependence and so education must be international in scope for global citizenship. For the social reconstructionists, education is designed “to awaken students’ consciousness about social problems and to engage them actively in problem solving”. (Ornstein, A. 1984) Social reconstructionists are firmly committed tao equality or equity in both society and education. Barriers of socio- economic class and racial discrimination should be eradicated. They also emphasize the idea of an interdependent world. The quality of life needs to be considered and enhanced on a global basis. (Ornstein, A. 1984) Comments:
Like John Dewey and George Counts, social reconstructionist
Brameld believe in active problem-solving as the method of teaching and learning. Social reconstuctionists are convinced that education is not a privilege of the few but a right to be enjoyed by all. Education is a right that all citizens regardless of race and social status must enjoy. F. Paulo Freire (1921-1997) Critical Pedagogy Critical Pedagogy and Dialogue vs. the Banking Model of Education
Paulo Freire, a critical theorist, like social
reconstructionists, believed that systems must be changed to overcome oppression and improve human conditions. Education and literacy are the vehicle for social change. In his view, humans must learn to resist oppression, and not become its victims, nor oppress others. To do so requires dialogue and critical consciousness, the development of awareness to overcome domination and oppression. Rather than “teaching as banking,” in which the educator deposits information into students’ heads, Freire saw teaching and learning as a process of inquiry in which the child must invent and reinvent the world. Teachers must not see themselves as the sole possessors of knowledge and their students as empty receptacles. He calls this pedagogical approach the “banking method” of education. A democratic relationship between the teacher and his students is necessary in order for the conscientization process to take place. Freire’s critical pedagogy is problem-posing education. A central element of Freire’s pedagogy is dialogue. It is love and respect that allow us to engage people in dialogue and to discover ourselves in the process and learn from one another. . . By its nature, dialogue is not something that can be imposed. Instead, genuine dialogue is characterized by respect of the parties involved toward one another. We develop a tolerant sensibility during the dialogue process, and it is only when we come to tolerate the points of view and ways of being of others that we might be able to learn from them and about ourselves in the process. Dialogue means the presence of equality, mutual recognition, affirmation of people, a sense of solidarity with people, and remaining open to questions. Dialogue is the basis for critical and problem-posing pedagogy, as opposed to banking education, where there is no discussion, only the imposition of the teacher’s ideas on the students. (Ornstein, A. 1984) Comment:
All of these education philosophers, point to the need of
interacting with others and of creating a “community of inquiry” as Charles Sanders Peirce put it. The community of inquiry is “a group of persons involved in inquiry, investigating more or less the same question or problem, and developing through their exchanges a better understanding both of the question as well as the probable solutions.“ (Lee, 2010) A community of inquiry will engage learners in active problem solving.
Summary: John Locke – the empiricist
Education is not acquisition of knowledge contained in the
Classics. It is learners interacting with concrete experience. The learner is an active not a passive agent of his/her own learning. From the social dimension, education is seeing citizens participate actively and intelligently in establishing their government and in choosing who will govern them from among themselves. They are of the thinking that no one person is destined to be ruler forever. This is in keeping with the Anti-Political Dynasty Bill. Spencer – the utilitarianist
To survive in a complex society, Spencer favors specialized
education over that of general education. “The expert who concentrates on a limited field is useful, but if he loses sight of the interdependence of things, he becomes a man who knows more and more about less and less. We must be warned of the early peril of over-specialism. Of course, we do not prefer the other extreme, the superficial person who every day knows less and less about more and more. Who is fittest survives. Individual competition leads to social progress. The competition in class is what advocates of whole-child approach and Socio-emotional Learning (SEL) atmosphere approach negate. The whole child approach, a powerful tool for SEL-focused schools has tenets – “each student learns in an environment that is physically and emotionally safe for students and adults” and “each student has access to personalized learning and is supported by qualified and caring adult . . .” (Frey, N. 2019) The highest words – emotionally safe and caring adults point to no competition for competition works against an emotionally safe environment. John Dewey - experience
Dewey does not disregard the accumulated wisdom of the past,
these past ideas, discoveries and inventions, our cultural heritage, will be used as the material for dealing with problems and so will be tested. If they are of help, they become part of a reconstructed experience. If they are not totally accurate, they will still be part of a reconstructed experiences. This means that the ideal learner for Dewey is not just one who can learn by doing, e.g., conduct an experiment but one who can connect accumulated wisdom of the past to the present. Schools are for the people and by the people. Schools are a democratic institution where everyone regardless of age, ethnicity, social status is welcome and is encouraged to participate in the democratic process of decision-making. Learners and stakeholders practice and experience democracy in schools. George Counts – Building a new social order Schools and teachers should be agents of change. Schools are considered instruments for social improvement rather than as agencies for preserving the status quo. Whatever change we work for should always be change for the better not just change for the sake of change. Problem-solving, like Dewey, should be the dominant method for instruction. “There is a cultural lag between material progress and social institutions and ethical values.” Material progress of humankind is very evident but moral and ethical development seem to have lagged behind. Theodore Brameld – the Social Reconstructionist
Social reconstructionists critically examine present
culture and resolve inconsistencies, controversies and conflicts to build a new society not just change society. Technology era is an era of interdependence and so education must be international in scope for global citizenship. Paulo Freire – Critical pedagogy vs. Banking method
Employ critical pedagogy and dialogue in contrast to
the banking system of education. Learners are not empty receptacles to be filled.