How Do I See Myself
How Do I See Myself
1. When you are studying or reviewing lessons, are you more likely to take rationalist viewpoint or
empiricist viewpoint? Why?
I'm more inclined to take an empiricist stance since when I'm studying, I want to read them first
so that I can refresh what I've learned. Even though I still have a limited understanding of the
subject, I plan to research it more in order to clarify any points that are confusing to me.
2. How do you apply empiricism and/or rationalism in studying your lesson? Be specific and
concrete. Try to remember your habits and how you make sense of the lesson.
I make my notes or reviews so that I may look at them and visualize what is written there of
course. For example, I put the lessons I need and then I highlight the key words, but the meaning
is still included so that when I look at it, I get what is being referred to. Then while I’m studying, I
need to look at my reviewer to find out if I’m getting it correctly, first and foremost, I will write
notes or reviews including the information I need to learn. In this case, I may also employ the
rationalist. Because you can quickly think of what the key word implies when you reread it. So,
while reviewing, we may practically apply the same rationalist and empiricist.
When given their respective realms, I believe rationalism and empiricism can coexist effectively.
Rationalism provides formal relational structures but is indifferent about their use. Empiricism
offers data sets for the use of relational systems. Rational knowledge is meaningless unless it is
used. Empirical knowledge is disordered in the absence of systematic connections.