CH 2 Lecture Notes 2
CH 2 Lecture Notes 2
CH 2 - Lecture notes 2
Economics is also studied on various levels. We can study the decisions of individual households and firms. Or we can
study the interaction of households and firms in markets for specific goods and services. Or we can study the
operation of the economy as a whole, which is the sum of the activities of all these decision makers in all these
markets.
Microeconomics is the study of how households and firms make decisions and how they interact in specific markets.
Macroeconomics is the study of economywide phenomena, including inflation, unemployment, and economic
growth. A microeconomist might study the effects of rent control on housing in New York City, the impact of foreign
competition on the U.S. auto industry, or the effects of compulsory school attendance on workers’ earnings. A
macroeconomist might study the effects of borrowing by the federal government, the changes over time in the
economy’s rate of unemployment, or alternative policies to promote growth in national living standards.
Microeconomics and macroeconomics are closely intertwined. Because changes in the overall economy arise from
the decisions of millions of individuals, it is impossible to understand macroeconomic developments without
considering the associated microeconomic decisions.
Despite the inherent link between microeconomics and macroeconomics, the two fields are distinct. Because they
address different questions, each field has its own set of models, which are often taught in separate courses.
When economists are trying to explain the world, they are scientists. When they are trying to help improve it, they
are policy advisers.
Positive statements are descriptive. They make a claim about how the world is. A second type of statement, such as
Norm’s, is normative. Normative statements are prescriptive. They make a claim about how the world ought to be.
A key difference between positive and normative statements is how we judge their validity. We can, in principle,
confirm or refute positive statements by examining evidence. By contrast, evaluating normative statements involves
values as well as facts. Deciding what is good or bad policy is not just a matter of science. It also involves our views
on ethics, religion, and political philosophy.
Yet normative conclusions cannot come from positive analysis alone; they involve value judgments as well.
Economists in Washington
Economists are aware that trade-offs are involved in most policy decisions. A policy might increase efficiency at the
cost of equality. It might help future generations but hurt current generations. An economist who says that all policy
decisions are easy or clear-cut is an economist not to be trusted.
Making economic policy in a representative democracy is a messy affair—and there are often good reasons why
presidents (and other politicians) do not advance the policies that economists advocate. Economists offer crucial
input into the policy process, but their advice is only one ingredient of a complex recipe.
Why do economists so often appear to give conflicting advice to policymakers? There are two basic reasons:
• Economists may disagree about the validity of alternative positive theories about how the world works.
• Economists may have different values and therefore different normative views about what government
policy should aim to accomplish.
Rent control, a policy that sets a legal maximum on the amount landlords can charge for their apartments. Almost all
economists believe that rent control adversely affects the availability and quality of housing and is a costly way of
helping the neediest members of society. Nonetheless, many city governments ignore the advice of economists and
place ceilings on the rents that landlords may charge their tenants. Page 32 and 33!
Swarada Bharadwaj
08-23-19