0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views49 pages

Chapter6 Determine System Requirements

passive, taking notes Analysts: passive, taking notes Recorder: records output on flipcharts Observers: watch process but do not participate Technical experts: provide input as needed Sponsor: senior manager who initiated JAD 32 JAD (Cont.)  JAD Process:  Opening session: introductions, objectives  Brainstorming: generate ideas without criticism  Analysis: organize, clarify, prioritize ideas  Modeling: diagram ideas, flows, relationships  Consolidation: finalize requirements  Closing: summarize, plan next steps 

Uploaded by

Mohamed K Marah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views49 pages

Chapter6 Determine System Requirements

passive, taking notes Analysts: passive, taking notes Recorder: records output on flipcharts Observers: watch process but do not participate Technical experts: provide input as needed Sponsor: senior manager who initiated JAD 32 JAD (Cont.)  JAD Process:  Opening session: introductions, objectives  Brainstorming: generate ideas without criticism  Analysis: organize, clarify, prioritize ideas  Modeling: diagram ideas, flows, relationships  Consolidation: finalize requirements  Closing: summarize, plan next steps 

Uploaded by

Mohamed K Marah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 49

Modern Systems Analysis

and Design
Week 4
Determining System
Requirements

Lecturer: Hamid Milton Mansaray


Phone#: +23276563575
Email: [email protected]
Learning Objectives
 Describe options for designing and
conducting interviews and develop a plan
for conducting an interview to determine
system requirements.
 Explain the advantages and pitfalls of
observing workers and analyzing business
documents to determine system
requirements.

2
Learning Objectives (Cont.)
 Explain how computing can provide support for
requirements determination.
 Participate in and help plan a Joint Application
Design session.
 Use prototyping during requirements
determination.
 Describe contemporary approaches to
requirements determination.
 Understand how requirements determination
techniques apply to the development of
electronic commerce applications.
3
Performing Requirements Determination

FIGURE 6-1
Systems development life cycle with
analysis phase highlighted

4
The Process of Determining
Requirements
 Good Systems Analyst Characteristics:
 Impertinence—question everything
 Impartiality—consider all issues to find the best
organizational solution
 Relaxing constraints—assume anything is possible
 Attention to details—every fact must fit
 Reframing—challenge yourself to new ways

5
Deliverables and Outcomes
 Deliverables
for Requirements
Determination:
 From interviews and observations —
interview transcripts, observation notes,
meeting minutes
 From existing written documents —
mission and strategy statements, business
forms, procedure manuals, job
descriptions, training manuals, system
documentation, flowcharts
6
Deliverables and Outcomes (Cont.)
 From computerized sources — Joint
Application Design session results, CASE
repositories, reports from existing systems,
displays and reports from system prototype

7
Traditional Methods for
Determining Requirements
 Interviewing individuals
 Interviewing groups
 Observing workers
 Studying business documents

8
Interviewing and Listening
 One of the primary ways analysts gather
information about an information systems
project
 Interview Guide is a document for
developing, planning and conducting an
interview.

9
Guidelines for Effective
Interviewing
 Plan the interview.
 Prepare interviewee: appointment, priming questions.
 Prepare agenda, checklist, questions.
 Listen carefully and take notes (tape record if
permitted).
 Review notes within 48 hours.
 Be neutral.
 Seek diverse views.

10
Interviewing and Listening (Cont.)

FIGURE 6-2 Typical interview guide

11
Choosing Interview Questions
 Each question in an interview guide can
include both verbal and non-verbal
information.
 Open-ended questions: questions that have
no prespecified answers
 Closed-ended questions: questions that ask
those responding to choose from among a set
of specified responses

12
Interviewing Groups

 Drawbacks to individual interviews:


 Contradictions and inconsistencies between
interviewees
 Follow-up discussions are time consuming
 New interviews may reveal new questions
that require additional interviews with those
interviewed earlier

13
Interviewing Groups (Cont.)
 Interviewing several key people together
 Advantages
 More effective use of time
 Can hear agreements and disagreements at once
 Opportunity for synergies
 Disadvantages
 More difficult to schedule than individual interviews

14
Nominal Group Technique (NGT)

 A facilitated process that supports idea


generation by groups
 Process
 Members come together as a group, but
initially work separately.
 Each person writes ideas.
 Facilitator reads ideas out loud, and they are
written on a blackboard or flipchart.

15
Nominal Group Technique (NGT)
 Group openly discusses the ideas for
clarification.
 Ideas are prioritized, combined, selected,
reduced.
 NGT exercise used to complement group
meetings or as part of JAD effort.

16
Directly Observing Users
 Direct Observation
 Watching users do their jobs
 Obtaining more firsthand and objective
measures of employee interaction with
information systems
 Can cause people to change their normal
operating behavior
 Time-consuming and limited time to observe

17
Analyzing Procedures and
Other Documents
 Document Analysis
 Review of existing business documents
 Can give a historical and ―formal‖ view of
system requirements

18
Analyzing Procedures and
Other Documents (Cont.)
 Types of information to be discovered:
 Problems with existing system
 Opportunity to meet new need
 Organizational direction
 Names of key individuals
 Values of organization
 Special information processing circumstances
 Reasons for current system design
 Rules for processing data
19
Analyzing Procedures and
Other Documents (Cont.)
 Useful document: Written work
procedure
 For an individual or work group
 Describes how a particular job or task is
performed
 Includes data and information used and
created in the process

20
Analyzing Procedures and
Other Documents (Cont.)

FIGURE 6-3 Example of a procedure

21
Analyzing Procedures and Other
Documents (Cont.)
 Potential Problems with Procedure
Documents:
 May involve duplication of effort.
 May have missing procedures.
 May be out of date.
 May contradict information obtained through
interviews.

22
Analyzing Procedures and
Other Documents (Cont.)
 Formal Systems: the official way a
system works as described in
organizational documentation (i.e. work
procedure)
 Informal Systems: the way a system
actually works (i.e. interviews,
observations)

23
Analyzing Procedures and
Other Documents (Cont.)
 Useful document: Business form
 Used for all types of business functions
 Explicitly indicate what data flow in and out of
a system and data necessary for the system
to function
 Gives crucial information about the nature of
the organization

24
Analyzing
Procedures and
Other Documents
(Cont.)
FIGURE 6-4
An example of a business form—An
invoice form for QuickBooks, from
jnk.btobsource.com. Reprinted by
permission.
Source: http://jnk.btobsource.com/
NASApp/enduser/products/product_
detail.jsp?pc513050M#

25
Analyzing Procedures and
Other Documents (Cont.)
 Useful document: Report
 Primary output of current system
 Enables you to work backwards from the
report to the data needed to generate it
 Useful document: Description of
current information system

26
Analyzing Procedures and
Other Documents (Cont.)

27
Contemporary Methods for
Determining System Requirements
 Joint Application Design (JAD)
 Brings together key users, managers, and
systems analysts
 Purpose: collect system requirements
simultaneously from key people
 Conducted off-site
 Group Support Systems
 Facilitate
sharing of ideas and voicing of opinions
about system requirements

28
Contemporary Methods for Determining
System Requirements (Cont.)
 CASE tools
 Used to analyze existing systems
 Help discover requirements to meet changing
business conditions
 System prototypes
 Iterative
development process
 Rudimentary working version of system is built
 Refine understanding of system requirements in
concrete terms

29
Joint Application Design (JAD)
 Intensive group-oriented requirements
determination technique
 Team members meet in isolation for an
extended period of time
 Highly focused
 Resource intensive
 Started by IBM in 1970s

30
JAD (Cont.)

FIGURE 6-6 Illustration of the typical room layout for a JAD


Source: Based on Wood and Silver, 1995
31
JAD (Cont.)
 JAD Participants:
 Session Leader: facilitates group process
 Users: active, speaking participants
 Managers: active, speaking participants
 Sponsor: high-level champion, limited participation
 Systems Analysts: should mostly listen
 Scribe: record session activities
 IS Staff: should mostly listen

32
JAD (Cont.)
 End Result
 Documentation detailing existing system
 Features of proposed system

33
CASE Tools During JAD

 Upper CASE tools are used


 Enables analysts to enter system
models directly into CASE during the
JAD session
 Screen designs and prototyping can
be done during JAD and shown to
users

34
Using Prototyping During
Requirements Determination
 Quickly converts requirements to
working version of system
 Once the user sees requirements
converted to system, will ask for
modifications or will generate
additional requests

35
Using Prototyping During
Requirements Determination (Cont.)
 Most useful when:
 User requests are not clear.
 Few users are involved in the system.
 Designs are complex and require concrete
form.
 There is a history of communication
problems between analysts and users.
 Tools are readily available to build
prototype.

36
Using Prototyping During
Requirements Determination (Cont.)
 Drawbacks
 Tendency to avoid formal documentation
 Difficult to adapt to more general user
audience
 Sharing data with other systems is often not
considered
 Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
checks are often bypassed

37
Radical Methods for Determining
System Requirements
 Business Process Reengineering
(BPR): search for and implementation of
radical change in business processes to
achieve breakthrough improvements in
products and services

38
Radical Methods for Determining
System Requirements (Cont.)
 Goals
 Reorganize complete flow of data in major
sections of an organization.
 Eliminate unnecessary steps.
 Combine steps.
 Become more responsive to future change.

39
Identifying Processes to Reengineer

 Identification of processes to reengineer


 Key business processes
 Structured, measured set of activities designed to
produce specific output for a particular customer or
market
 Focused on customers and outcome

 Same techniques are used as for requirements


determination

40
Disruptive Technologies
 Information technologies must be applied to
radically improve business processes.
 Disruptive technologies are technologies
that enable the breaking of long-held
business rules that inhibit organizations from
making radical business changes.

41
Disruptive Technologies (Cont.)

42
Requirements Determination using
Agile Methodologies
 Continual user involvement
 Replace traditional SDLC waterfall with iterative
analyze – design – code – test cycle
 Agile usage-centered design
 Focuses on user goals, roles, and tasks
 The Planning Game
 Based on eXtreme programming
 Exploration, steering, commitment

43
Continual User Involvement

FIGURE 6-11
The iterative analysis–design–code–test
cycle

44
Agile Usage-Centered Design
Steps
 Gather group of programmers, analysts, users, testers,
facilitator.
 Document complaints of current system.
 Determine important user roles.
 Determine, prioritize, and describe tasks for each user
role.
 Group similar tasks into interaction contexts.
 Associate each interaction context with a user interface
for the system, and prototype the interaction context.
 Step through and modify the prototype.

45
The Planning Game from
eXtreme Programming

FIGURE 6-12
eXtreme Programming’s Planning Game

46
Electronic Commerce Applications:
Determining System Requirements
 Determining system requirements for Pine
Valley furniture’s Webstore
 System layout and navigation characteristics
 Webstore and site management system
capabilities
 Customer and inventory information
 System prototype evolution

47
Summary
 In this chapter you learned how to:
 Describe interviewing options and develop
interview plan.
 Explain advantages and pitfalls of worker
observation and document analysis.
 Explain how computing can support
requirements determination.

48
Summary (Cont.)
 Participatein and help plan Joint
Application Design sessions.
 Use prototyping during requirements
determination.
 Describe contemporary approaches to
requirements determination.
 Understand how requirements
determination techniques apply to the
development of electronic commerce
applications.
49

You might also like