4 Bi English
4 Bi English
4 Bi English
Part Four: (B) The Planning Cycle - (i) Unpacking the Curriculum - English
Note: The responses and interpretations have been provided by the English subject association.
§ The effective and reflective use of the complement of language skills provides students with a foundation for success in their
future endeavours both in school and in the world beyond school.
ii) What in the curriculum is critical for the student to know and be able to do and will have enduring value beyond the classroom?
The following four strands represent the key elements of the English program. They are::
§ Literature Studies and Reading,
§ Writing,
§ Language, and
§ Media Studies.
§ All four strands are considered integral to the curriculum in English; no strand may be weighted at less than 20%.
ii) Describe the structure of the strands in the curriculum document in relationship to each course.
§ Expectations are repeated from year to year in increasingly complex forms to encourage students to refine and sharpen their
Part Four: (B)The Planning Cycle - (i) Unpacking the Curriculum
English
Page 1
Policy to Practice
reading, writing, and oral communication skills. The verbs are often key indicators of the complexity of the expectations from one
grade to another and one level of course to another.
Curriculum Expectations
i) How do the overall expectations and specific expectations relate to one another?
§ There is a direct relationship among the overall expectations and the clusters of specific expectations as identified by sub-headings.
In the specific expectations, the parentheses and accompanying examples assist in identifying the complexity of the learnings
designated by the expectations; however, these examples do not prescribe or limit the teacher’s choices.
ii) Are there curriculum expectations for learning not integrated into the overall or specific expectations? If so, how do these relate to
the overall and specific expectations?
§ Generally speaking, there are no other expectations for learning that are not integrated into the overall and specific expectations.
However, the Catholic Graduate Expectations act as an umbrella of additional curriculum expectations that must be integrated into
all subject areas including English.
§ The achievement chart categories constitute the underlying structure of all assessment and evaluation
§ In English, a variety of approaches have been used to record the level of student achievement.
§ Some boards use a range for each achievement category (e.g., 20-30% per category).
§ Some boards have cross-referenced achievement chart categories with strands for cross-matched weighting. Teachers give
specific feedback on achievement chart categories by means of rubrics on specific demonstrations of achievement of expectations,
which are linked to strands. Weights are assigned to each strand from a range of 20-30%. Certain strands may be weighted more
or less heavily, depending on the needs of students in each course and destination.
§ The weighting of the Knowledge/Understanding and Thinking/Inquiry categories may be heavier in Grades 9 and 10 Academic
courses, while Communication and Application categories may be weighted more heavily in Grades 9 and 10 Applied courses and
the Grade 11 Literacy Course.
ii) How are the relative importance and emphasis determined? (e.g., amount of assessment/evaluation done, time spent learning)
§ All four categories are essential to the learning and expression of language. Overall, no one category is more important than
another; however, achievement categories may be weighted differently from one demonstration of student learning to the next. The
relative weights assigned each category will depend on how the expectations for the task are clustered (e.g., some categories may
not be reflected at all, while some may be weighted much more heavily than others).
iii) How can teachers of English courses ensure that sufficient evidence is gathered for all four categories in the achievement chart?
§ Effective assessment and evaluation planning, linking curriculum expectations to the appropriate methods, strategies and tools will
ensure that evidence is gathered for all four categories of the achievement chart. It is essential that students have clear targets with
descriptions of criteria and performance indicators that provide purposeful detailed feedback to allow them to develop
demonstrations and products that reflect higher-level thinking.
§ In English, there is a range of practice that allows a certain amount of freedom for teachers to address the knowledge and skills
that need to be addressed with particular groups of students. For example, a teacher may choose to have students focus on
Knowledge and Thinking in one Media assignment, and focus on Communication and Application in the next Media assignment.
Although the individual assignment’s evaluation rubric will not indicate all four Achievement Chart categories, the students will have
addressed all four categories within the body of Media work assigned and completed.
§ Boards which cross-reference achievement chart categories with strands use rubrics as their primary assessment tool. All
Part Four: (B)The Planning Cycle - (i) Unpacking the Curriculum
English
Page 7
Policy to Practice
categories of the achievement chart are represented and evaluated, and linked specifically to expectations from within a strand or
strands.
6. Learning Skills
i) When are learning skills explicitly stated as part of the English curriculum in the form of curriculum expectations?
§ While many expectations assume implicit learning skills such as working independently, and demonstrating organization, there are
almost no explicit references to learning skills in the expectations for the English curriculum. The one clear match is noted below
under “Teamwork.”
ii) What could teachers look for to track learning skills (listed below) in this curriculum document?
§ The chart below outlines how the learning skills look in the English curriculum.
Works Independently § Reference is made to independent work in a few areas (e.g., “Independently selects, evaluates, and uses
appropriate learning materials, resources, and activities”.)
§ In English, students are given opportunities to work both independently and collaboratively; however, most
evidence of a student’s independence will be assessed within the context of the assigned work. Therefore,
English teachers will report on independence, for the most part, under separate learning skills.
Teamwork There is a fair amount of cross matching between Teamwork and English expectations under the Language
strand, specifically “Developing Listening and Speaking Skills.” At each grade level, there is an expectation
referencing listening techniques and oral communication skills to participate in group discussions. In Grades
11 and 12 especially, the expectation references “fulfilling roles as required; preparing for discussion; asking
questions to extend understanding; completing assigned tasks for the group; working towards consensus; and
accepting group decisions when appropriate.” This language is very reflective of items under the Learning
Skill “Teamwork” such as “accepts various roles…; takes responsibility for his or her own share of the work to
be done; works to help achieve the goals of the group or the class; in discussion, paraphrases, points of view
and asks questions to clarify meaning and promote understanding; seeks consensus and negotiates
agreement before making decisions.”)
Organization § For English, organization within the curriculum expectations is specific to the merits of the assigned task. As
a learning skill, English teachers do not evaluate organizational skills outside of the context of the assigned
task.
Work Habits/Homework § As a learning skill, English teachers do not evaluate homework simply for completion. A student’s record of
homework completion may be reported under learning skills. The evaluation of homework assignments must
be based upon the curriculum expectations.
Initiative § In English, a student’s extra effort will be reflected in the overall quality of his/her work and evaluated within
that context.