Hydrocarbons in The Exhaust Gas of Biogas-Driven Combined Heat and Power Units
Hydrocarbons in The Exhaust Gas of Biogas-Driven Combined Heat and Power Units
Hydrocarbons in The Exhaust Gas of Biogas-Driven Combined Heat and Power Units
5.2010 | LANDTECHNIK
339
5.2010 | LANDTECHNIK
340 ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
4000 80
ϮϬ ϭϬϬϬ
KϮͲÄƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞŶŐͼŬtŚͲϭ
KϮͲĞƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚ ĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ ŐͼŬtŚͲϭ
NOx HCHO 63
ΗDĞƚŚĂŶƐĐŚůƵƉĨ„ KϮͲÄƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚ 3500 70
ϭϴ ϵϬϬ
DĞƚŚĂŶĞ ƐůŝƉ KϮ ͲĞƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚ
ϭϲ ϴϬϬ 3000 60
ΗDĞƚŚĂŶƐĐŚůƵƉĨΗй
HCHO-Grenzwert
HCHO [mg*m ]
HCHO-limit value
DĞƚŚĂŶĞ ƐůŝƉ й
ϭϰ ϳϬϬ
-3
NOx [mg*m-3]
2500 50
ϭϮ ϲϬϬ 38 38
2000 40
ϭϬ ϱϬϬ
ϴ ϰϬϬ 1500 24 30
17
ϲ ϯϬϬ 1000 15 20
12 NOx-Grenzwerte
10
ϰ ϮϬϬ NOx-limit values
500 10
2
Ϯ ϭϬϬ
0 6 0
Ϭ Ϭ 1. 2. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 1. 1. 1.
ϭϬϬŬt
ϭϵϬŬt
ϮϱϬŬt
ϯϮϰŬt
ϱϮϲŬt
ϭϭϬŬt
ϮϱϬŬt
ϯϬŬt
ϯϳŬt
ϳϱŬt
30 kWel. 100 kWel.190 kWel.324 kWel. 526 kWel. 75 kWel. 110 kWel.250 kWel.
(Oxi-Kat)
Gas-BHKW Oxidation Zündstrahl-BHKW
'ĂƐͲ,<t ƺŶĚƐƚƌĂŚůͲ,<t gas engine converter pilot injection engine
'ĂƐĞŶŐŝŶĞ WŝůŽƚŝŶũĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĞŶŐŝŶĞ
Methane emissions (methane slip) and CO2 equivalent NOx and formaldehyde measurements in the exhaust gas of different
emissions of different CHPU in practice CGUs
formaldehyde emissions [3]. Similar results were obtained from aldehyde level exceeded the limit value according to TA Luft
investigations at biogas facilities by the Saxon Agency for Envi- already for the NOx-optimized setting. For partial load, both the
ronment, Agriculture and Geology [4] and the Bavarian Agency results for emission levels and electrical efficiency were par-
for Environment [5]. ticularly poor with a very high output of hydrocarbons and a
In the engine, radical combustion of fuel to carbon dioxi- reduction of electrical efficiency by almost 4 % (figure 3).
de and water follows different steps, with formaldehyde as an
intermediate. If due to high combustion air input the flame ve- Catalytic converter (Oxi-Kat)
locity becomes too low, combustion becomes incomplete and The use of a catalytic converter is regarded as the cheapest and
formaldehyde cannot be further oxidized. This also applies to easiest solution to remove hydrocarbons and especially form-
certain zones in the combustion chamber. It is assumed that aldehyde from the exhaust gas. However, measurements of ex-
formaldehyde originates from the top land (space between pis- haust gas concentrations upstream and downstream of a cata-
ton and the first piston ring) where no combustion occurs [3]. lytic converter at the 526 kWel gas CGU (see figure 2) provided
Formaldehyde concentrations of individual CGUs measu- some interesting results. Despite a reduction of CO and form-
red in these investigations are rather low compared to the limit aldehyde concentrations in the Oxi-Kat by more than 90 %, no
value of 60 mg•m-3 (TA Luft) (figure 2). However, it can be reduction of other hydrocarbons could be detected (figure 4).
seen that low formaldehyde levels appear almost always in con- This means that while the output of formaldehyde and CO could
junction with NOx concentrations exceeding limit values. This be almost avoided by using a catalytic converter, there was no
indicates a considerable influence of engine settings on formal- effect on the emission of methane as a greenhouse gas. These
dehyde emission levels. findings were also confirmed by [7] who stated that catalytic
Furthermore the positive effect of a catalytic converter (Oxi- converters have no oxidation potential for CH4 as part of CnHm
Kat) can be recognized in figure 2. The use of an Oxi-Kat with emissions.
the 526 kWel gas CGU reduced the formaldehyde concentration
in the exhaust gas to 6 mg•m-3. However, a value of 38 mg•m-3 Conclusions
formaldehyde from the second measurement already indicated Hydrocarbon concentrations in the exhaust gas of biogas-dri-
damage of the Oxi-Kat due to excessive concentrations of H2S ven CGUs depend on several factors among which engine set-
in the biogas. ting plays a prominent role. Beside formaldehyde which is now
To examine the influence of engine settings on emission le- very much in the focus, methane emissions (methane slip) from
vels and combustion efficiency, several CGUs were measured in CGUs with combustion engines should not be neglected, as
three operating states: „NOx-optimized“, „efficiency-optimized“, they can considerably impair the carbon foot print of electricity
and „partial load“ [6]. Here, the influence of engine setting from biogas.
could be seen clearly (figure 3).
Literature
For the efficiency-optimized mode, the electrical efficien- [1] Aschmann, V.; Kissel, R.; Effenberger, M.; Eichelser, R.; Gronauer, A.
cy could be raised by almost 1.5 %, if increased NOx emissions (2007): Effizienzsteigerung, Emissionsminderung und CO2-Einsparung
durch optimierte Motoreinstellung bei Biogas-Blockheizkraftwerken zur
were accepted. The concentration of unburned hydrocarbons dezentralen Stromerzeugung. Abschlussbericht zum Forschungsvorha-
was slightly below the NOx-optimized setting, while the form- ben. Hg. Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Augsburg
5.2010 | LANDTECHNIK
341
Fig. 3 Fig. 4
ϰϬϬϬ
Ğů͘tŝƌŬƵŶŐƐŐƌĂĚƵŶĚƺŶĚƂůĂŶƚĞŝůй͕,,KŵŐͼŵͲϯ
ϭϮϬ ϮϬϬϬ
EKdž K ,,K
ϭϲϮϭ
EKdž͕K͕Ŷ,ŵ͕,,KŵŐͼŵͲϯ
ϯϬϬϬ ϵϬ ϭϱϬϬ
,,KͲ'ƌĞŶnjǁĞƌƚ ϭϮϱϬ
,,KͲůŝŵŝƚǀĂůƵĞ KͲ'ƌĞŶnjǁĞƌƚ
ϮϬϬϬ ϭϬϰϮ KůŝŵƚǀĂůƵĞ
ϲϬ ϭϬϬϬ
KͲ'ƌĞŶnjǁĞƌƚ
KͲůŝŵŝƚǀĂůƵĞ
ϯϵ͕ϲ EKdžͲ'ƌĞŶnjǁĞƌƚ ϯϴ͕ϯ ϳϱϬ
EKdžͲůŝŵŝƚǀĂůƵĞ ϯϰ͕ϱ EKdžͲ'ƌĞŶnjǁĞƌƚ
ϭϬϬϬ ϯϬ EKdž ůŝŵŝƚǀĂůƵĞ ϰϴϱ
ϱϬϬ ϰϱϰ
ϭϭ͕ϯ
ϯ͕ϳ ϯ͕Ϯ ,,KͲ'ƌĞŶnjǁĞƌƚ
ϮϱϬ
Ϭ ϵϮ ,,Kůŝŵŝƚ ǀĂůƵĞ ϳϲ
Ϭ ϳ
ǁŝƌŬƵŶŐƐŐƌĂĚŽƉƚŝŵŝĞƌƚ EKdžͲŽƉƚŝŵŝĞƌƚ dĞŝůůĂƐƚ Ϭ
ĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐLJŽƉƚŝŵŝnjĞĚ EKdž ŽƉƚŝŵŝnjĞĚ WĂƌƚŝĂůůŽĂĚ ǀŽƌKdžŝͲ<Ăƚ ŶĂĐŚKdžŝͲ<Ăƚ
ďĞĨŽƌĞŽdžŝĚĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶǀĞƌƚĞƌ ĂĨƚĞƌŽdžŝĚĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶǀĞƌƚĞƌ
ϲϲŬtĞů͘ ϲϳŬtĞů͘ ϰϳŬtĞů͘
ϱϮϲŬtĞů͘
Exhaust gas emissions and electrical efficiency of a biogas-driven Exhaust gas concentrations of NOx, CO, HCHO and hydrocarbons
pilot injection engine depending on engine setting (CnHm) before and after precatalytic converter (Oxi-Kat)
Authors
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Volker Aschmann is technical assistant within Biogas
Technology Working Group at the Bavarian Research Center for Agricu-
lture (LfL), Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Animal Husbandry,
Vöttinger Str. 36, 85354 Freising, E-Mail: [email protected]
Dr. Mathias Effenberger is postdoctoral research fellow within the Bio-
gas Technology Working Group at the LfL.
Dr. agr. Andreas Gronauer is head of this working group.
Acknowledgement
This work was funded by the Bavarian State Ministry of Nutrition, Agricul-
ture and Forestry.
5.2010 | LANDTECHNIK