AML Eng Full Version
AML Eng Full Version
AML Eng Full Version
Contents
Part 1 – The Objectives 4
1
Contents (continued)
Part 4 – The Risks 22
A. Accountants 23
(a) Suspicious Activity Indicators 24
(b) Case Example 1-3 26
B. Estate Agents 29
(a) Suspicious Activity Indicators 29
(b) Case Example 1-4 31
2
Contents
Contents (continued)
Part 5 – Quiz 46
A. General Questions 47
C. Answers 62
3
PART1
The Objectives
4
PART 1 | Objectives
5
PART2
International
Standards and
Way Forward
6
PART 2 | International Standards and Way Forward
8
PART 2 | International Standards and Way Forward
9
PART3
The Basics
10
PART 3 | The Basics
11
3.4 hese three stages are not distinct. They are very often
T
overlapping with each other and repeated, making tracing of
crime proceeds and their sources difficult.
3.5 In Hong Kong, crime proceeds are generated from various
illegal activities. They can be derived from drug trafficking,
smuggling, illegal gambling, bookmaking, blackmail,
extortion, loan sharking, tax evasion, controlling prostitution,
corruption, robbery, theft, fraud, copyright infringement,
insider dealing and market manipulation.
3.6 hen crime proceeds are laundered, criminals would then
W
be able to use the money without being linked easily to the
criminal activities from which the money was originated.
12
PART 3 | The Basics
13
3.10 oth money laundering and terrorist financing are criminal
B
offences under the Laws of Hong Kong. According to
the Drug Trafficking (Recovery of Proceeds) Ordinance
(Cap.405) and the Organized and Serious Crimes
Ordinance (Cap.455), a person commits the offence of
money laundering if he deals with any property, including
money, which he knows or has reasonable grounds to
believe to be proceeds of crime. Under the United Nations
(Anti-Terrorism Measures) Ordinance (Cap.575), a person
commits the offence of terrorist financing if he provides or
collects funds knowing or with the intention that the
funds will be used to commit terrorist act(s).
3.11 aking an indifferent attitude or turning a blind eye to a
T
transaction you know or have reasonable grounds to believe
that crime proceeds/terrorist funds are involved, may result
in your conviction for the above offences.
14
PART 3 | The Basics
15
3.15 ailing to report knowledge or suspicion of crime proceeds
F
or terrorist property is a criminal offence. If you go on to
deal with such property knowing or having reasonable
grounds to believe that the property is crime proceeds,
then you may have committed the offence of money
laundering.
3.16 It should be noted that the crime from which the proceeds
were derived does not need to have taken place in Hong
Kong, e.g. if you come across certain property in Hong
Kong, which you know or suspect is proceeds of drug
trafficking in an overseas country, you should also report
your knowledge or suspicion to the JFIU. Again, failure to
report knowledge or suspicion of such property and dealing
with such property are criminal offences.
3.17 o prevent your sector from exploitation by money
T
launderers and terrorist financiers, and protect yourself from
unwittingly committing the money laundering and terrorist
financing related offences described above, in addition to
reporting suspicious transactions, it is advisable that you
should always conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD),
maintain proper records of transactions and have in
place a proper internal control system.
3.18 esides reporting suspicious transactions, CDD and record
B
keeping are two of the “core” money laundering and terrorist
financing counter-measures adopted by the international
community and have been implemented in the banking,
securities and futures, and insurance sectors in Hong Kong
in compliance with the anti-money laundering guidelines
issued by the respective sector regulators.
16
PART 3 | The Basics
17
3.22 he JFIU has developed a “SAFE” approach to assist you in
T
identifying suspicious transactions and business activities.
• Screen the customer and transaction for suspicious
activity indicators;
• Ask the customer appropriate questions to clarify
suspicious circumstances;
• Find out whether the transaction commensurates with
what is expected from the customer by reviewing the
information already known about the customer; and
• Evaluate all the above information and decide whether
the transaction relating to the customer is genuinely
suspicious.
In case of doubt, the JFIU is happy to advise (Tel no.:
2866 3366, Fax no.: 2529 4013, Email: [email protected]).
Evaluate
Find
Ask
Screen
3.23 s for record keeping, many businesses may have the
A
practice of keeping records of customers and transactions
in accordance with applicable legal requirements,
e.g. taxation etc. Record keeping is important to anti-
money laundering investigation which allows for swift
reconstruction of individual transactions and provides
evidence for prosecution of criminal activities including
money laundering.
18
PART 3 | The Basics
19
3.29 hough CDD, record keeping, suspicious transaction
T
reporting and internal controls have been practiced in our
banking, securities and insurance sectors for years, they are
certainly new to your sectors and may present challenges
to you. Apart from possible resource implications,
management commitment, capacity building and culture
change in your sectors and amongst your customers may
be required. It may take some time to incorporate these
measures in your daily practice. Most important of all is to
start practicing them now:
• Customer Due Diligence
• Record Keeping
• Suspicious Transaction Reporting
• Internal Control
20
PART 3 | The Basics
21
PART 4
The Risks
22
PART 4 | The Risks
4.1 In this part, suspicious activity indicators and case examples
specific to individual sectors are presented. You may learn
more about money laundering and terrorist financing risks
specific to your sector by going through the information
provided. Though the information is sector specific,
you are recommended to go through the case studies
of the other three sectors as well. That will certainly
enhance your understanding of money laundering
and terrorist financing. Please note that the suspicious
activity indicators listed are not exhaustive. Suspicious
transactions usually involve a number of indicators. In
making assessment, businesses should not rely on this
alone and should consider all pertinent information.
A. Accountants
4.2 he term “accountants” used in this guide refers to the
T
definition adopted by the Financial Action Task Force
on Money Laundering (FATF). The FATF employs an
“activity-based” approach to determine the types of
activities that accountants engage in should be subject
to its Recommendations on Anti-Money Laundering and
Counter Financing of Terrorism. In addition to complying
with the other Recommendations that are applicable to
Designated Non-financial Businesses and Professions,
accountants who prepare for or carry out transactions for
their clients concerning the following activities as stated in
FATF’s Recommendation 12(d) are specifically subject to its
Recommendations 5, 6 and 8 to 11:
• Buying and selling of real estate;
• Managing of client money, securities or other assets;
• Management of bank, savings or securities accounts;
• Organisation of contributions for the creation, operation or
management of companies; and
• Creation, operation or management of legal persons or
arrangements, and buying and selling of business entities.
23
4.3 ollowing on from the above and for the avoidance of doubt,
F
the term “accountants” used in this guide should not be
confined to mean any particular types of accountants, such
as certified public accountants, chartered accountants,
management accountants, or cost accountants. The FATF
definition includes those who work in the private sector
whether or not they hold accounting qualifications from the
professional bodies or institutes. It should be noted that
“internal” professionals who are employees of other types
of businesses, or professionals working for government
agencies, who may already be subject to measures that
would combat money laundering/terrorist financing, are
excluded.
4.4 he accounting profession provides a wide range of
T
services, including financial and tax advice, auditing, book-
keeping, company formation and administration, trust,
property transactions and introduction to banks, etc. While
these activities have their legitimate purposes, they are a
very attractive gateway which criminals/terrorists would
want to use for laundering crime proceeds/financing
terrorism.
4.5 iven the likelihood of being used for money laundering/
G
terrorist financing purposes, accountants must be vigilant at
all times and report anything suspicious to JFIU.
24
PART 4 | The Risks
25
(b) Below are three case examples for
illustration.
Case Example 1: Business entity misused
for money laundering
Mr. X was a drug trafficker who had to dispose of
a large amount of cash. He decided to employ an
accountancy firm to set up a company, purportedly for
trading purposes.
Through the introduction of the accountancy firm,
company bank accounts were opened. Cash
deposits were made into the bank accounts both by
Mr. X and staff of the accountancy firm.
Some of the money was then used to invest in the
local property market while certain amount was sent
overseas for purchase of electronic components
which were then shipped to the local market for sale.
By such activities, Mr. X successfully laundered over
US$500,000.
Key Message
Professional service of accountants and their
professional standing may be seen by criminals
as vehicles to be abused in order to launder crime
proceeds.
26
PART 4 | The Risks
28
PART 4 | The Risks
B. Estate Agents
4.6 he purchase of real estate is commonly used as part of
T
the last stage of money laundering (integration). Large
amount of illicit funds can be concealed in such a purchase,
which in turn projects an appearance of financial stability
for the criminal. Hence, estate agents should be vigilant
in exercising the CDD by obtaining customer’s information
and should comply with the record-keeping requirement
and internal control procedures as stipulated by the Estate
Agents Authority.
29
The Transaction
(i) Cash transactions in large amounts;
(ii) Substantial difference between the transaction
price and the market price without apparent
reason;
(iii) Unknown source of funds for purchasing the
property;
(iv) Unusually short period for completion of sale
and purchase;
(v) The transaction proceeds are directly transferred
between the purchaser and the seller, not
routing through a law firm; and
(vi) Unreasonably high commission is offered to the
estate agent.
Others
(i) The person who negotiates the transaction and
the ultimate purchaser are not the same person;
(ii) The property seller and the purchaser know
each other but choose to act through an estate
agent as if they did not know each other;
(iii) Frequent sale and purchase of properties within
related parties; and
(iv) Unusual ownership history of a property.
30
PART 4 | The Risks
31
Case Example 2: Direct purchase of
property to launder crime proceeds
A drug trafficker Mr. Z had made several investments
in real estate and was planning to buy a hotel. An
assessment of his financial situation did not reveal
any legal source of income. He was subsequently
arrested and charged with an offence of money
laundering. Further investigation substantiated the
charge that part of the invested funds were proceeds
of his own drug trafficking.
Key Message
This case illustrates that the purchase of real estate
is commonly used as part of the last stage of money
laundering (integration). Such a purchase offers the
criminal an investment which gives the appearance
of financial stability. The purchase of a hotel has an
added advantage for money laundering as hotel
business is often a cash intensive business.
32
PART 4 | The Risks
33
Case Example 4: Direct purchase of
property to launder crime proceeds by
family member
Mr. B in Country S was the leading member of a
syndicate involving smuggling of refugees. From
1998 to 2003, Mr. B received 81 money orders for
a total amount of HK$40 million from 14 different
individuals from four foreign countries. This money
was believed to be derived from organising illegal
migration. The main portion of this money remained
in Country S and was used for investment into
real estate and was also distributed among other
syndicate members. In 2000 alone, Mr. B’s wife who
did not file an income tax statement for that year,
used HK$14 million to buy real estate. Investigation
revealed that Mr. B and Mrs. B had made transactions
representing several times their apparent incomes.
They were finally charged and convicted, in
connection with the amount of HK$40 million, for
organising illegal migration.
34
PART 4 | The Risks
Key Message
This case illustrates that the purchase of real estate by
relatives of criminals is not uncommon as a practice
for money laundering.
35
(iii) Unusual payment method (payment by
negotiable instruments in bearer form, e.g.
travellers cheques and cashier orders so that the
source of fund cannot be traced);
(iv) Unusual buying behaviour/pattern (e.g. repeated
purchases of luxury products without apparent
reasons);
(v) Unusual behaviour of the person or persons
conducting the transactions (e.g. unusual
nervousness); and
(vi) Request for over/under-invoicing of purchases.
36
PART 4 | The Risks
37
(b) Below are three case examples for
illustrations.
Case Example 1: Retail gold purchases
serve as direct method of laundering
A foreign national bought 265 ingots of gold with a
total value of about US$2.5 million and paid in cash
in Country X. These transactions took place over a
period of 18 months. The buyer, who did not have a
bank account, alternated temporary jobs with periods
of unemployment, claimed that he was acting on
behalf of a third party, who was probably involved in
organised and serious crimes.
Key Message
This case illustrates the direct purchases of precious
metal by a buyer of incommensurate background to
disguise the source of crime proceeds.
38
PART 4 | The Risks
39
D. Trust and Company Service Providers
4.8 rust and corporate entities provide the basis for a range
T
of economic activities in modern economies. Although
they have many legitimate applications (such as business
finance or estate and tax planning), they can be misused
by criminals for illegal purposes such as hiding the
ultimate beneficial ownership of assets, legitimatising the
integration of crime proceeds with the financial system,
or layering of crime proceeds through various forms of
investment such as in the stock market.
4.9 rust and
T corporate structures may be set up by terrorists
and used wholly or partly for financing of terrorist activities.
Trust, for example, may be established for charitable
purposes and subsequently misused to finance terrorist
activities.
4.10 In view of the risks involved, trust and company service
providers must be vigilant at all times and report anything
suspicious to JFIU.
41
(b) Below are four case examples for illustration.
Case Example 1: A structure of trusts
misused for fraud
Mr. X was a trust service provider in Jurisdiction A. He
established a number of domestic trusts to carry out
a fraud scheme, defrauding over 500 investors of
about US$56 million.
The scheme involved Mr. X, in the name of the
domestic trusts, wiring large amounts of money to
domestic and off-shore bank accounts. The money
came from the 500 odd innocent investors who were
convinced to form trust organisations and to place
their savings into these trusts, which were tied to
the off-shore bank accounts. The investors were
promised favourable returns and reduced tax liabilities
as the money was deposited into off-shore bank
accounts. Once the investors put in their money to
the trusts, Mr. X would inform them that the money
would be managed by an international investment
agency. In fact, this has never happened and
Mr. X and his associates defrauded the trust owners
(investors).
Key Message
The above case illustrates that a structure of trusts
together with off-shore bank accounts can give the
appearance of a legitimate purpose, which can then
be used to lure investment from innocent third parties
for illegal purpose.
42
PART 4 | The Risks
43
Case Example 3: Corporate vehicle misused
to channel bribes
A railway builder (Company Z) in Jurisdiction K has
employed a law firm to form a complex structure of
companies so that bribes can be transferred through
these companies’ bank accounts to officials in various
other jurisdictions to thank them in “facilitating” the
award of contracts to Company Z. Whilst there was
no legitimate business in these series of companies,
the overseas money transfers were substantial. After
the bribes were transferred, the companies and their
bank accounts became dormant.
Key Message
Corporate vehicles were used to channel bribe
payments so as to veil the connection between the
party which offers bribe and their ultimate recipients.
44
PART 4 | The Risks
45
PART5
Quiz
46
PART 5 | Quiz
5.1 efore concluding this guide, let’s have a small test to see
B
if you understand what we have just discussed.
A. General Questions
1. Which of the following acts does not constitute a
money laundering offence?
a. Dealing with any property, knowing the property
is proceeds of a crime
b. Dealing with any property, believing the property
is proceeds of a crime
c. Dealing with any property, suspecting the
property is proceeds of a crime
47
3. When should a suspicious transaction report be
made when you deal with your customer?
a. Whenever there are suspicious activity
indicators making the transaction with the
customer suspicious
b. Whenever there are suspicious activity
indicators and the transaction with the
customer remains suspicious, after all the
information has been reviewed and attempt to
clarify the issues with the customer has failed
c. For all transactions of HK$200,000 and above
48
PART 5 | Quiz
49
8. Following upon Q.7, Mr. X and Mrs. X visited your
accountancy firm. Mrs. X told you that she was a
housewife for the past 20 years with no income. The
cash, which amounted to HK$2 million, was her
savings and earnings from share trading. However,
no documentary proof was given by Mr. X and
Mrs. X. The couple requested you to go ahead setting
up the company. What should you do?
a. Refuse the business as the circumstances are
suspicious
b. Make a STR to JFIU in order to report your
suspicion
c. Proceed with the business as you have
completed CDD with Mrs. X
51
(b) Estate Agents
6. You are approached by a walk-in customer
who wishes to purchase a luxury apartment for
HK$8 million. Following a brief visit to the subject
apartment, the customer offers HK$2 million as
initial deposit. Moreover, the customer requests a
completion date as soon as possible. For the initial
deposit, he declines to provide any other form of
payment other than cash. If you were the agent,
which of the following would be your best course
of action in this situation:
a. Ask for the reason(s) for the urgency for
completion of the transaction and the
abnormally high amount of initial deposit and
advise the customer to use other form of
payment such as a cheque or a cashier order
as initial deposit
b. Accept the initial deposit and try to complete
the transaction as soon as possible
c. Decline the transaction
54
PART 5 | Quiz
56
PART 5 | Quiz
57
(d) Trust and Company Service Providers
6. A walk-in customer, Mr. Roberts, came to your
company which provides company service and asked
to set up a limited company, Company A. He asked
this to be done quickly because he will be returning to
the United States soon. He provided the name of his
wife as another shareholder of the company to be set
up. He claimed that he would supply copies of both
his and the wife’s passport at a later stage. What is
the most appropriate course of action?
a. Refuse Mr. Roberts’ business as the
circumstances are suspicious
b. Proceed with the business and conduct CDD
on Mr. Roberts and his wife
c. Proceed with the business but make a
suspicious transaction report to JFIU because it
looks suspicious
58
PART 5 | Quiz
59
8. Following upon Q.7, Mr. Roberts told you that he
came from the United States and would stay in Hong
Kong for a few days only. He claimed that he wanted
to deposit the proceeds of a declared dividend
he obtained in the United States and invest in real
estate in Hong Kong. As he is too busy to open a
bank account, he requested to deposit the money
(in traveller’s cheques and cash) into your company’s
bank account so that the money could be transferred
to the bank account of Company A for property
investment. What should you do?
a. Ask your staff to deposit the traveller’s cheques
and cash into your company’s bank account
and wait for further instruction from Mr. Roberts
b. Make a STR to JFIU as the circumstances are
suspicious
c. Refuse the business but no need to make a
STR to JFIU
9. Following upon Q.8, Mr. Roberts sent you a letter
from the United States saying that as the Hong Kong
property market seemed to go down, he had decided
to change his investment plan. He requested your
company to telegraphic transfer the money to his
friends’ bank accounts in the United States. What is
the best course of action?
a. Proceed with the transfer as the money belongs
to Mr. Roberts
b. Refuse the request as you suspect that it is a
money laundering scheme
c. Make a STR to JFIU to explain the suspicion you
have in this case
60
PART 5 | Quiz
61
C. Answers
General
1. Answer: c
A person commits the offence of money laundering
when he/she deals with any property knowing or
having reasonable grounds to believe it to be
crime proceeds or terrorist property. If a person
knows or suspects any property to be crime
proceeds or terrorist property, he/she should report
his/her knowledge or suspicion to the Joint Financial
Intelligence Unit. Failing to report is an offence.
2. Answer: a
3. Answer: b
4. Answer: c
5. Answer: a
7. Answer: a
You should continue your effort of conducting “CDD”
on Mr. X. It may be premature at this stage to make a
STR.
62
PART 5 | Quiz
8. Answer: b
You should make a STR to JFIU because the
circumstances are suspicious enough to warrant
such action (e.g. no income but with substantial cash;
no documentary proof to support the claim).
9. Answer: b
Although the proposed transaction is not in line with
the normal activities of the trust, it is advisable to
obtain further information from Mr. Z before you come
to a decision whether you should make a STR to JFIU
or not.
10. Answer: c
A name hit against the terrorist list should give rise
to suspicion that the transaction may be terrorist
financing-related. A report should be made to JFIU.
It is up to the Police to investigate the case.
63
7. Answer: b
If you consider the case still suspicious even though
you have done “Know Your Customer”, it is better
for you to decline the transaction and report your
suspicion to the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit. In
declining the transaction, you may explain to the
customer that it is in accordance with the anti-money
laundering practices of your company, that you
need to be satisfied with the result of “Know Your
Customer” before proceeding with the transaction for
the customer. In making a report, there is no need for
you to establish the predicate crimes.
8. Answer: c
There are reasonable grounds for you to suspect that
his assets are proceeds of crimes.
9. Answer: a
here is no time limit for reporting a suspicious
T
transaction. The report should be made as soon
as practicable once you have the knowledge or
suspicion.
10. Answer: c
he suspicious activity indicators include (i) husband
T
arrested for crimes, (ii) urgent disposal of property,
and (iii) transaction not consistent with normal
business/commercial activities.
64
PART 5 | Quiz
7. Answer: c
There are suspicious circumstances, which you
cannot clear after doing “Know Your Customer”. The
suspicious activity indicators include (i) new customer
and unusual purchase, (ii) cash of foreign currency
in large amount, and (iii) suspicious demeanour of
the customer and his evasiveness. In declining the
deal, you may explain to the customer that it is in
accordance with the anti-money laundering practices
of your company, that you need to be satisfied
with the result of “Know Your Customer” before
proceeding with the transaction for the customer.
8. Answer: b
There are reasonable grounds for you to suspect that
the property of Mrs. Tsao may be proceeds of crime.
Suspicious activity indicators include (i) husband
involved in crimes, and (ii) making purchases in large
amount.
9. Answer: b
You need to “Know Your Customer” before deciding
whether the offer should be accepted or a suspicious
transaction report be made.
65
10. Answer: b
The proposed transaction has no business
sense at all and more “Know Your Customer” is
needed. Suspicious activity indicators include
(i) transaction with no business sense, and (ii)
British Virgin Islands company is involved.
7. Answer: a
ou should continue to conduct “CDD”
Y
with a view to getting more information on
Mr. Roberts. It may be a bit too early to say that
the case is so suspicious that a STR should be
made.
8. Answer: b
The circumstances (e.g. dividend in the form
of traveller’s cheques and cash; request the
money to go through your company account)
are suspicious enough to warrant a STR to be
made to JFIU.
66
PART 5 | Quiz
9. Answer: c
Make a report to JFIU so that the case can be
referred to the appropriate law enforcement
agency for follow up action.
10. Answer: c
T
he transaction may be related to terrorist
activities. A report should be made to JFIU.
67
So, what is your score?
Please see the scale below:
0 2 4 6 8 10
If you get five or more correct answers out of a total of ten questions
in the general and industry-specific sections, then you pass the
test. Otherwise, you may need to go over this guide again, refer to
your training or compliance officer, or consult the JFIU for further
assistance.
Reference Materials:
• Legal bulletin of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public
Accountants
• Anti-money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing Guidelines
of the Hong Kong Institute of Chartered Secretaries
• Practice Circulars of the Estate Agents Authority
68
Report Suspicious Transactions
Joint Financial Intelligence Unit
Tel: 2866 3366 Fax: 2529 4013 Email: [email protected]