Textile Finishing Lab Report (9) : Title: Application of Water Repellent Finish
Textile Finishing Lab Report (9) : Title: Application of Water Repellent Finish
Submitted by
Submitted to
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………
…2
1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………4
1.1. Background
…………………………………………………………………………4
1.2. Objectives.
……………………………………………………………..……………4
1.3. Theory
…………………………………………………………………………….…4
2. Equipments and materials ………………....…………………………………….…………4
2.1. Chemicals
…………………………………………………………….………………5
3. Procedure……….……………………...……………………………………………………5
4. Results………………………………………………………………………………………5
5. Conclusion…………………………………..………………………………………………6
6. Samples ……………………..………………………………………………………………6
7. References …………………………………………………………………………….……6
3
1 Introduction
1.1. Background:
Finishes that repel water are important in all parts of the textile market- for clothing,
home and technical textiles. The purpose of this finish is self evident. Drops of water
should not spread on the surface of the textile and should not wet the fabric. The drops
should stay on the surface and easily drip off. It is achieved by using different product
groups. There are many tests to evaluate water repellent fabric but most common method
used is AATCC TM 22- Water repellency spray test. In this a treated fabric is stretched
taut, held at a 450 angle and sprayed with 250 ml of water from above. The resulting
wetting pattern, if any, is rated using photographic standards. This is a simple, rapid
method.
1.2. Objective:
To apply the water repellent finish with and without cross-linking agent
To evaluate the performance of finish by doing shower test
To evaluate the durability of finish after multiple washing
1.3. Theory:
Repellent finishes achieve their properties by reducing the free energy at fiber surfaces. If
the adhesive interactions between a fiber and a drop of liquid placed on the fiber are
greater than the internal cohesive interactions within the liquid, the drop will not spread.
So, surface energy is decreased by using repellent finishes. Such finishes can be applied
by either mechanical incorporation of by using chemical technique. Chemical interaction
can be happened by the development of ionic bonding, covalent bonding and hydrogen
bonding.
Plastic beakers
Stirrers
Weighing balance
Padder
Stenter
100 % Cotton fabric (woven)
4
2.1. Chemicals
Water repellent finish(Tubigaurd RWN) = 80 g/L
Cross-linking agent (Repellan XLE) = 40 g/L
Application Method
Conditions
3. Procedure
i. A beaker was taken and in that measured amount of cross-linking agent was poured.
ii. After that 100 ml of water was added and stirred.
iii. Then measured amount of finish was added and again stirred.
iv. Beaker was filled up to 1000ml.
v. Then that fabric was padded on padder followed by drying and curing.
vi. This same procedure was adopted for applying finish without cross-linking agent.
vii. After that both samples were washed for 3 times according to the standard.
Washing Recipe
Detergent = 5g/l
Sodium carbonate = 2g/l
Temp. = 600C
Time = 30 min.
viii. Then again shower test was performed and results were compared.
4. Results
5
90 = random wetting of specimen face
5. Conclusion
Crosslinker has increased the rating of water repelency. But crosslinker has
increased its durability after washing.
By the application of finish surface energy of fabric is decreased leading to lower
adhesive force between fiber and water than the cohesive forces between water so
producing fabric that exhibits water repellency.
6. Samples
6
7. Reference
Chemical finishing of textiles by W.D. Schindler and P.J. Hauser