Soria, S. & Maldonado, A. (2016) The Long and Widening Road of The Football Industry in Chile
Soria, S. & Maldonado, A. (2016) The Long and Widening Road of The Football Industry in Chile
Soria, S. & Maldonado, A. (2016) The Long and Widening Road of The Football Industry in Chile
Chapter 18
Sebastian Soria
Andres Maldonado
To Marcelo Bielsa
Football is by far the most popular sport in Chile. According to Adimark (2008),
62.3% of the country’s population mention it as their first sport, followed by basketball, with
only 9.1% of the preferences. This passion has not been reflected in the results: the Men’s
Football National Team had failed to win any official title, until the recent victory on Copa
América 2015, and at the club level the achievements can be counted with the fingers of
one hand. Moreover, in the last decades Chile has shown economic stability and sustained
growth, establishing an optimal scenario for the development of the industry. However,
despite the popularity of football and the growth in economic development, the industry
has not been able to consolidate a sustainable growth. Continuous changes in the
administrations of both the professional football league and the Men’s National Team have
not allowed the development of a long-term plan. For this reason, coupled with the debts
owed by the clubs to the national treasury, the government decided to intervene by forcing
Over the last decade, the country has witnessed the discussion on the effects of
Law No. 20.019, enacted in 2005. Different leaders and officers have criticized this new
management model; for instance, René Orozco (Bruna, 2012), former president of
Universidad de Chile, one of the biggest clubs in the country, asserts that “public-limited
companies are killing football” (para 1), this given that they see football as business and
2
“...the essence of sport is lost” (para 1). In the same vein, Raúl Labán (2014), the current
president of Club Social y Deportivo Colo Colo, states that “professional football has never
been so poor, undercapitalised, indebted and so less transparent than today” (p. 44). On
the other hand, Ricardo Abumohor (2014), former president of the Asociación Nacional de
current president of O’Higgins, points out that the law “established a framework of rights
and responsibilities” (p. 44) and highlights the significance that new organizations are
the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States. This, in theory, implies
more accountability and higher levels of transparency and clarity in the responsibilities of
Although these opposing views coexist in the industry, there is a consensus on the
fact that the ownership structure of clubs is just one piece of a rather complex puzzle. In
fact, there are a number of problems that remain in the management of clubs: lack of long-
term planning, shortage of qualified professionals, low investment in infrastructure, and the
lack of a vision of the fan as a customer to be retained. In other words, very low
investment on increasing customer loyalty. Moreover, a weak leadership from the league
has undermined the potential growth of the clubs. There has not been a clear intention to
coordinate their members to take advantage of economies of scale. There has been little
interest in generating projects that value the tournament and its associated services. There
is a paradoxical situation in Chile. Technically, the league (ANFP) administers the Chilean
Football Federation (FFCH) and therefore manages both professional football and the
Men’s National Team. However, about 90% of the league’s revenues come from the Men’s
Given this situation, this chapter critically discusses the development of the industry
in the country, first, from a historical perspective, addressing the transformation from non-
profit football clubs to for-profit corporations and, then later, through an analysis of the
management problems that remain after this transition is occurred. Then, the creation of
the Chilean Football Television Network or Canal del Fútbol (CDF), the league’s own
television network, is presented and its success is reviewed. Finally, the authors examine
the recent decision of ANFP to regulate clubs’ expenditures from the league. Since one of
the chapter’s authors was the Head of the Financial Control Unit at ANFP during the
creation of these rules, the writers have a privileged and practical view of that process.
It is possible to say that the idiosyncrasies of those who have managed Chilean
football are short-sighted and not very innovative (Gutierrez, 2010). Football institutions
have been administered in the same way for a long time, and due to an ongoing football
industry crisis (see next section), they have become what they are now, mostly
professional sports organizations that aim to organize, produce, market and participate in
sporting shows in order to obtain a profit. That is, partly, the definition that the article 1 of
Chilean football has been changing since the beginning of this century, basically
following foreign models given the opportunity that arose with the crisis that occurred
during that time. Those events will be reviewed in this section of the chapter in an attempt
to illustrate a situation where the loss of value of the National Team and the
mismanagement of some clubs, especially the most popular ones, created the necessary
conditions to promote the changes. The outcomes of this complex process are the main
subject of this chapter, and these will be analysed from two perspectives: the Men’s
4
National Team and the clubs, since the economic performance of both is particularly
In this regard, based on a chronology of events, this chapter will refer to the
institutional modifications of the football clubs. Special emphasis will be placed on the two
major changes that emerged during the crisis: first, the enactment of Law No. 20019 and
its subsequent amendments; and second, the foundation of the Canal del Fútbol (CDF), a
2009). However, there will be a review of other initiatives that have arisen aiming to
develop the football industry, such as the Proyecto de Estadios Bicentenario (Bicentennial
Stadiums Project) and the Plan Estadio Seguro (Safe Stadium Plan), both led by the
government.
The Crisis
The crisis of Chilean football sprouted in parallel with its apparent success. In the
late 1990s, the Men’s National Team had qualified for the 1998 FIFA World Cup in France
and the country euphorically celebrated its return to this global event after 16 years.
Football was in vogue, large contracts were signed, more jerseys were sold, and football
attracted the attention of most of the population. The country stopped and watched the
performance of the National Team attentively. Meanwhile, the domestic league was
enhanced with great foreign players, and teams tried to improve year after year on a scale
successful situation toward a future of prosperity, carrying up the whole industry in its
development (Guarello, 2012). However, all the brightness of that time collapsed in
sporting in administrative and economic terms. Chilean football, at both clubs and the
Men’s National Team, experienced its own crisis. During the last 15 years there has been
5
a relatively joint response to this crisis. Leadership has been taken by the government
rather than by the football governing body and, as it is discussed below, many of the clubs
The Men’s Football National Team was highly valued because of its classification
to the 1998 FIFA World Cup. The pairing of Iván Zamorano and Marcelo Salas led Chile to
the global elite. Nevertheless, no one paid attention to the way the Chilean team qualified.
At that time, it was important to have qualified and not how. It was 1997 and after 16 years
out of World Cups, Chile achieved one of the four South American spots for France 1998.
The National Team ended those qualifications with 25 points in the fourth place among
nine teams (notwithstanding that Brazil did not participate since they were the reigning
world champions), beating Peru with only a goal difference. That moment of excitement
seemed to predict a successful future. However, after that, Chile was relegated to the last
place with 12 points out of 54 in the Korea – Japan 2002 classifications. Then, in the
Germany 2006 FIFA World Cup classification process, the Men’s National Team was
ranked seventh among ten participants with 22 points, being eliminated from both events.
Only in the classifications for the 2010 and 2014 FIFA World Cups did Chile get enough
points to secure a place. At that time, Chile obtained 33 points and an extraordinary
second place among ten teams, competing with Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay among
others. Four years later, during the qualifications for Brazil 2014, Chile obtained a
The same sporting crisis can be seen in the results obtained in Copa América, the
most important tournament for men’s national teams organized by Conmebol (the South
American Football Confederation). In Paraguay 1999, Chile was ranked fourth (two
victories, three defeats, and one draw). In Colombia 2001, the team finished seventh (two
victories and two defeats). In Peru 2004, an indecorous tenth place (one draw and two
6
defeats). After that, the recovery process started with an eighth place in Venezuela 2007,
a fifth position in Argentina 2011, and the first trophy in Chile 2015 (Segurola, 2015).
The evolution of the Men’s National Team has been addressed because there are
no clear boundaries between the Chilean Federation and the league, as it was mentioned
before. This confusion has led to a number of conflicts between the economic interests of
the National Team and the professional football clubs. Moreover, the transformation of the
clubs to for-profit corporations has created greater tensions and increased the
diminished and devalued the Men’s Football National Team with it. The failures of clubs,
reflecting the lack of long-term ideas and proposals, have negatively affected the income
of ANFP, and created a profound disaffection between the public and football (Sturgess,
2009).
The Clubs
The crisis at the club level transpired more or less in the same period, and in this
case, the collapse was not only in sporting performance but also in the economic realm.
Between 2002 and 2006, the Chilean league witnessed the bankruptcy of its two most
popular clubs, notwithstanding that they received the greatest benefits of what the industry
produced. The failure of Colo Colo was declared on January 23 of 2002, and the collapse
of Universidad de Chile occurred on May 26 of 2006. Both reflected a partial view of what
was happening across professional clubs, but the magnitude and impact of these two
clubs’ failures shed some light on the inherent economic weakness of the industry, which
once seemed healthy and prosperous. These events, in the public view, seemed to be just
the tip of the iceberg: if both clubs – the most popular, successful on the pitch, and with
more revenue than ever before – had such important deficits, the rest of the clubs should
2002, professional football was squelched with a nearly one-month strike in which players
and coaches unanimously participated (Emol, 2002). The debts of the teams to the
Treasury of the Republic were unsustainable and showed an underfunded industry that
image was poor, with stadiums often in appalling conditions, violence problems, an
increasing insecurity, constant changes to the league format, and lack of positive results in
international events. Disinterest affected the industry’s revenue, and broadcasting rights
The sport and economic crisis had an impact on both the public and private
sectors. Being that football is the most popular sport in Chile, this is an industry that is
generously subsidized by the state. Thus, the stadiums are mostly owned by the state, the
cost of maintaining order and security within them is assumed by the law enforcement
personnel of the state, and there are also a number of benefits for the clubs regarding their
debts to the Treasury. All these privileges the football industry has form a highly
anomalous situation with the new institutional framework of the clubs based on their
recently mandated pursuit of profit. It is difficult to understand the persistence of this logic
– that privatizes profits and socializes the costs – in the context of Chilean neo-liberal
economic system, without understanding how football is rooted in the national culture.
and important for the government. As noted, the crisis rocked the sporting institutions, but
it also affected the government’s image. The diverging paths between the successes of
the Chilean economy in the past thirty years and the failures of the football industry turned
on a warning light that should be considered. Football had failed to follow the path of other
8
economic activities of the country and had not been able to capitalize on the economic
Early on, safety issues were discussed at a political level. Thus, the Law of
Violence in Stadiums was enacted (Law No. 19.327 of 1994), which was enhanced in
2011 by the Safe Stadium Plan under the Ministry of Home Affairs and Public Security. It
works "to improve the law, the operational and security management related to
professional football, and invest in infrastructure to increase control and run awareness
campaigns" (Estadio Seguro, n.d.a, para 1). Moreover, the state also attempted to
modernize the failed institutional framework. In 2005, Law No. 20019 was enacted. It
essentially aimed to create sports organizations that are attractive for private investors.
With regard to the organisation of the FIFA U-20 Women’s World Cup in 2008, it
filled a historical debt to the sporting venues in the country, virtually abandoned by football
clubs which, not having owners, almost did not invest in their improvement or
maintenance. All these measures were taken and managed by different administrations,
All these projects were conceived from the public sector, this reflects the
importance that lies behind football. However, this contrasts with the incongruity generated
by the fact that a spectacle that is now a more private economic activity is supported by
the society as a whole. This, as it was mentioned before, was more evident with the
enactment of the Law 20019 and its amendments, establishing for-profit clubs as a way to
Moreover, through the football league’s governing body, ANFP, the same clubs
saw this crisis as an opportunity to make changes that could lead to a modernization in the
industry. The creation and commercial success of the Canal del Fútbol (CDF) is by far the
9
most important result and demonstrates the most effective way to recognize the potential
income of this intangible asset that underlies a society prone to consume football.
convert clubs into financially sustainable organisations in order to develop an industry that
has been under-exploited and poorly managed. However, it seems to have flaws or
After this forced process of conversion, a radical change in how the clubs were
managed was expected. The influx of new capitals supplied by investors from other
industries would mean not only fresh resources to the clubs, but also know-how and new
skills. However, the process has been slower and more complicated than imagined. After
nearly a decade since Law 20019 took effect, several management problems persist. For
instance, the new rules force the clubs to send their financial information to the
Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros (SVS). Even though during the first years this
governmental entity relaxed the application of sanctions and fines, professional football
accumulated 509 sanctions and fines between both until July 2013, mainly because they
did not even bother to send the information (Obregón, 2013). This reflects a complex
problem: despite the new law, many clubs work with a sense of impunity. Hitherto, they
believe, or what is worse, they have some degree of certainty that regulators will not
punish them with the severity that they deserve. Nevertheless, this is slowly changing;
there have been some signs in that direction from both governmental agencies and the
ANFP. This will be reviewed in greater detail in the last section of this chapter. But, despite
the aforementioned breaches of the law, there is much more public information about the
clubs’ finances than even before, which helps to analyse trends in revenue, their
Revenue Analysis
As mentioned before, some clubs have not published their annual reports or have
not broken down the different revenue streams. However, there is enough information
available from 2010 onward to shed some light on the current situation of the clubs’
management. Only 16 out of 18 clubs released their complete annual reports for the 2011
and 2012 seasons. Bearing this in mind, it is possible to identify four main revenue
streams within the Chilean industry: Broadcast, Commercial, Match day and Transfers.
This is slightly different from the situation of the English Premier League, where teams are
importing talent and therefore have only three main streams (Deloitte, 2013,). If these
during 2012 (see Table 1). This phenomenon is explained by the success experienced by
Sudamericana champions, the first South American title for a Chilean team in 20 years,
but they were not able to retain their best players. This created a bias in the overall
industry analysis since their transfers represented more than 50% of those made by the
entire industry. In fact, if the three biggest clubs are not considered in this analysis, the
significant losses of both commercial and match day streams is remarkable (see Table 2).
This is a key point in the discussion of this chapter. Its explanation is clear: both
commercial and match day revenue streams are not growing at the same pace as the
other two are; hence they are losing presence in the revenue mix of the Chilean clubs. A
personnel in the area, lack of appropriate technology tools, and, most importantly, absence
Moreover, the great inequality in clubs’ income is also a problem that has not been
addressed properly, and this is undermining the long-term competitive balance. The
industry’s revenue is concentrated mainly in the three biggest clubs. In 2011, the top
Chilean tier reported a 57.6% of the total income. Meanwhile, in 2012, this proportion fell
to 54.9%, still over half of the total revenue. In fact, the ratio between the clubs with
highest and lowest incomes was 12.8 times in 2011 and 19.4 times in 2012, and if the Gini
coefficient is analysed for these two seasons, the numbers are explanatory: 0.50 and 0.51.
This sheds a negative comparison with the major European leagues. For instance, during
2009-2010, the Premier League showed an index of 0.33 and Series A showed 0.41; only
La Liga, which showed an index of 0.57 (Deloitte, 2011), was more unequal than the
Chilean League. In this regard, it is critical to review the distribution pattern of broadcasting
revenue which, as will be discussed in the next section, favours the big 3 Clubs (Colo Colo
Universidad de Chile and Universidad Católica) with a larger share for them (. This harms
the attractiveness of the league and affects the competitive balance and, as a result, the
Football in Perspective
Despite the great media impact of football clubs, their frequent coverage in
newspapers and the high ratings of the week’s highlights, teams have not been able to
monetize this exposure. As Kuper and Szymanski (2012) wisely compare, not even the
richest clubs on earth are fairly close to getting the income of a company in the FTSE 250.
Clearly, football brands are often more powerful than many companies from other
cannot be appreciated.
In Chile, the situation is exactly the same or worse than what has been illustrated
by Kuper and Szymanski. In fact, if the top tier clubs are compared with an average store
12
like SODIMAC, a Chilean home improvement retailer and constant football sponsor, the
evidence is clear: average club revenues are approximately between 20 and 25% of those
of the average store (see Table 3). This is not surprising given the high level of maturity
and development that the retail industry has experienced in Chile. Unlike the football
industry, they have invested in knowing their customers, improving their service and
As a matter of fact, if the internet presence is analysed, the picture is not positive.
For instance, the growth of e-commerce in Chile has been enormous in recent years.
According to Cristino (2013), the country has the second highest penetration rate in Latin
America, with sales over US$1 billion in 2012. Despite this fact, football clubs seem
oblivious to this situation. Only 5 out of 18 top tier clubs have developed their own e-
commerce, and, just recently in 2014, the league is building its own online shop. This is
not due to lack of resources - it is possible to find inexpensive solutions today, but rather
due to low investment in knowing their customers, developing new technologies and
Moreover, back to the comparison with SODIMAC, each store would certainly not
be able to generate the current revenue without the support of the corporate trademark
logistics aspects generate significant economies of scale that are exploited by all
branches. This explains much of the individual success of the average store. In countries
with more developed football industries, this phenomenon has been acknowledged and
league brand has taken a leading role in the commercialization of football. The English
Premier League and the Champions League are perhaps the best examples of how the
13
tournament can add value to the individual clubs. Although there are some signals in this
line, the Chilean league is far from having a clear plan to address this matter in depth. This
would require a level of coordination and cooperation between the clubs that does not
exist today. In general, the short-term individual interest is above the long-term collective
Attendance Analysis
economically, it is useful to draw a parallel between the football industry and other
entertainment industries. As the most popular sport, football has become part of the
entertainment industry, competing with films, concerts and other leisure activities. If it is
The latter has invested in infrastructure and services, achieving great growth in annual
attendances to movies. Since 1997, cinema attendence has increased from 2,947,269 to
20,122,604 spectators per year, a growth of 582.75%. On the other hand, during the same
period, professional football has only managed to increase its audience 65% from
2,489,344 to 4,110,451 (see Table 4). In other words, professional football attendance has
Indeed, Chilean stadiums have very low rates of use. During the first half of 2013,
Colo Colo, the most popular team in the country, had an average attendance of 13,104
spectators (Estadio Seguro, 2013) with an average occupancy rate of 30.4%. Moreover,
Union Española, a team that was crowned champion during that time, reported an average
attendance of 5,097 (Estadio Seguro, 2013) with an occupancy rate of under 30%. This
14
landscape affects not only match day revenue, but also the other income streams. For
example, potential commercial partners avoid empty stadiums or pay less for the
on leisure activities if the behaviour of Chilean families is analysed. In 1997, the average
spending was about 5.5% of the total expenditures (INE, 1998b). Meanwhile, in 2012, this
share grew to approximately 6.6% (INE, 2013). This represents great opportunities for
football clubs as the country gets richer; its population has more disposable income for
entertainment and leisure. Herein lies the great challenge: how the industry may be able to
capture a larger share of that spending. The efforts have not been enough so far.
Beyond Law No 20019, in recent years the state has been a leader in terms of
changes in the football industry. Not only it has enacted changes in the ownership
structure of the clubs, but it has also taken a leading role in security in the stadiums and
infrastructure investment.
In terms of safety and security, Plan Estadio Seguro (Safe Stadium Plan) is a
government program under the Ministry of Home Affairs and Public Security. Its main
objective, according to its website (Estadio Seguro, n.d.b), is “that families across Chile
can attend stadiums safely” (para 1). This initiative has forced football clubs to take certain
steps to ensure a safer environment. Probably, the most important steps have been the
end of the links between the clubs and the barras bravas or the hooligans, with tough
sanctions involved, and the reserve the possibility to apply the right of admission to
stadiums. Previously, it was common to find clubs funding away trips and giving away
tickets to their core (and many times violent) fans (see, for example, La Segunda, 2012).
15
Although this program has laid the foundation for the eradication of violence in stadiums, it
has lacked sufficient planning and funding required to accomplish the objectives set.
improving sports infrastructure in the country. Since Chile hosted the FIFA U-20 Women’s
World Cup in 2008, the government of that time planned the construction and renovation
of different stadiums across the country. The plan was called Red de Estadios
independent country in 2010. The first stage of this plan was the construction of four new
stadiums (Temuco, Chillan, La Florida and Coquimbo) and the upgrade of the National
Stadium. The second stage included another nine stadiums with an estimated investment
of US$250 million (Emol, 2010). Lastly, given that Chile will host the Copa America and
the FIFA U-17 World Cup in 2015, other six stadiums are being renovated almost
these investments have been conceived with the aim of organizing these international
events, they have directly benefited the professional football clubs and the league. With
nearly 20 new stadiums under FIFA standards, the first and second divisions will show a
renewed face to the public. This will undoubtedly have a positive effect on the income of
the clubs, which have not contributed to the development of new infrastructure. Certainly,
this is a promising scenario; however, this is due to the leadership taken by the state in
The history of Chilean football will probably be marked by the launch of the Chilean
Football Television Network or Canal del Futbol (CDF). As it was noted before, its
establishment and its unusualness of being majority owned by the ANFP were only
16
possible in the context of the crisis suffered by Chilean football, where the financial stability
of the sport had a precipitous drop in its valuation within the market (Garcés, 2013). Such
a deep devaluation scenario could enable clubs to postpone their short-term vision to
venture into a medium-term business, which, if successful, promised to be the panacea for
While the establishment of the CDF has been successful in funding clubs (Garcés,
2013), is not by itself a solution to the problems of their management. The evidence
suggests that clubs, even those with higher incomes, may have negative financial results.
Even worse, most of them show zero growth in terms of infrastructure and no new
management models. This shows that, without institutional changes, the football industry
Historically, football has been subjected to constant changes. Clubs often fluctuate
between success and defeat. The crisis saw a particular paradox that highlighted the
deficient administration in the Chilean football: while the country has enjoyed steady
economic growth for almost thirty years, the football organization was not able to capitalize
on this bonanza and the resulting economic stability. As noted before, the football industry
declined while the entertainment industry, such as cinemas, maintained significant growth.
As movie theatres were remodelled and innovated with new technologies, Chilean
Since the crisis onwards, Chile has intended to follow the innovations that other
countries had implemented in order to yield the inherent interest in football and to
capitalize on the relationship between the clubs and the Men’s Football National Team. In
this scenario, the establishment of the CDF became the tool to capture the income that
Before the establishment of the CDF, broadcasting rights were traded as follows:
the ANFP to television operators exploiting the broadcast rights for the national
17
championship over a period of time. And while there were bids which once were
considered successful, an analysis of the bids showed that there was a low level of
certainty between a negotiation and one without exponential growth (Garcés, 2013). In
fact, under that system of the sale of broadcasting rights, the maximum amount achieved
was US$12.7 million (De La Fuente, 2009). On the other hand, CDF has achieved to
distribute nearly US$60 million to the clubs in 2014 (Oliveros, 2015), and this figure has
shown a steady growth. Unfortunately, most of the new revenue has been used to finance
the growing salaries of players and coaching staff. This has not resulted in improved
competitiveness of the Chilean teams, but an inflation for purchasing and hiring players.
Moreover, the current TV revenue sharing model, which runs until the end of 2015,
intensifies the economic differences among the clubs. It distributes 25% of the proceeds to
the three biggest clubs, 57% to the other 15 clubs in first division, and 18% to the 14 clubs
It is undeniable that CDF has been a success for the industry; the product of
football has appreciated, allowing the clubs to reinvest in themselves. However, it does not
guarantee that clubs use this money well and efficiently. To do this, more profound
changes are required: more and better management staff and long-term planning.
Based on the situation described in the previous sections and at the requested of
the ANFP, Econsult, a prestigious consulting firm in finance and economics, produced a
report on the financial situation of the industry during the period 2008-2011. This report
could only considered 24 out of 32 teams in the first two divisions, given the breaches of
the clubs in sending the information to the SVS. Among its findings, it highlighted the
strong growth in operating revenue experienced by the clubs, increasing 62% in those
years. However, operating expenses during the same period were up by 69%, increasing
18
the operational deficit that clubs already showed in 2008. Although the new state
regulations have led to an increase in the costs of organizing matches, the big concern
raised by the clubs’ expenditures is that teams have not been able to properly regulate the
proportion of their budgets allocated to players and coaching staff (Econsult, 2012). For
football.
In this line, the ANFP formed the Financial Control Unit (FCU) in January 2013,
which aims to regulate and supervise the financial activities of clubs. As mentioned before,
this unit was led by one of the authors from its inception to July 2013. In practical terms,
the FCU began overseeing the monthly payments of sporting staff salaries and the annual
budgets of the clubs. However, the big challenge was to develop new regulations in order
to curb the exponential growth evidenced primarily by players’ salaries. Bearing this in
mind, the work was focused on analysing different cases and regulations that exist in
different parts of the world, starting with professional leagues in the U.S. and going
through the regulations implemented in Europe. Finally, the decision was to follow a model
proportional to the income of clubs. In other words, the FCU established a maximum limit
for spending on salaries for players and coaching staff, which is 70% of operating
revenues. The control system was structured thinking on prevention rather than
punishment. For this reason, from the 2013/14 season, clubs must submit semi-annual
budgets of their cash flows and performance reports. As a last requirement, an audited
Clearly, this regulation aims to address two critical issues, first, that clubs can avoid
reporting losses in a systematic, as they currently do; and second, that part of the funds
generated can be invested with a longer-term vision. In theory, these objectives should be
achieved, but it will depend on the willingness of the ANFP to enforce their
implementation. Historically, ANFP, the governing body of the league, has not been
19
sufficiently severe with its affiliates. The system of democratic elections has generated too
many compromises with their constituents, the clubs. Moreover, the idea to continue with
those elected officials for more than one term limits the scope of power that the elected
Conclusions
The development of the Chilean football industry has been reviewed in this chapter.
The development plan is an attempt to modernize this sport on a par with the economic
growth of the country in the last thirty years. Although the changes that appear to be the
most significant experienced by the industry have been identified, such as the renovation
of the infrastructure, improved security at events, changes in the legal constitution of the
clubs, and new revenue streams, most of them have not been promoted by industry
players but by external agents who, for one reason or another, have a significant interest
in the development of this sport. Thus, many of the changes come from the initiative of
such as public safety and sporting infrastructure. But they have also been active in
instances that may be outside their purview, including the enactment of the Law
establishing the football Public Limited Companies, which attempts to give a solution to the
deficit of clubs, encouraging private investment and giving greater responsibility to the
clubs’ directors.
Another element that was analysed is the creation and consolidation of the CDF,
which has become the largest financing vehicle of professional football, due to the regular
and progressive increase in the generated income, therefore creating huge opportunities
The sum of all these policies creates certain expectations that the challenges of the
football industry will be resolved by the ANFP and clubs in the short and medium term, and
20
will decide the maturity of the Chilean competition. First, given the legal transformation
undertaken by the clubs structure, it seems natural that the risk of profit and loss has been
granted to clubs’ owners. It is still a mystery how this situation will be resolved,
notwithstanding that the program Estadio Seguro has progressively given the clubs the
responsibility for security. Another challenge for the industry is to improve the financial
management of the new investors, an issue still underdeveloped. In recent years, great
potential for modernization has been opened to Chilean football. This is a new opportunity
for the entire industry. In the light of the information displayed in this chapter, it is not
possible to assert whether the key players will take this chance or will squander it again.
21
References
Abumohor, R. (2014), ‘Un aporte que requiere más exigencias’, La Tercera, p. 44, 19
Acosta, J. A. (2012), ‘Chile comienza a vestirse para 2015’, La Tercera, p. 47, 16 July,
print edition.
Adimark GfK (2008), Pasión de multitudes… Los chilenos y el fútbol, Adimark GfK,
Santiago.
Audax Italiano SADP (2012), Memoria anual 2011, Audax Italiano, Santiago.
Audax Italiano SADP (2013), Memoria anual 2012, Audax Italiano, Santiago.
Azul Azul S.A. (2012), Memoria anual 2011, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
Azul Azul S.A. (2013), Memoria anual 2012, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
Bruna, E. (2012), ‘René Orozco: "Las Sociedades Anónimas están matando al fútbol"’, El
sociedades-anonimas-estan-matando-al-futbol/prontus_elgrafico/2012-08-
Capital (2013), ‘Jadue y las cosas del fútbol’, Capital [Online], available at:
<http://www.capital.cl/negocios/2013/09/09/070937-jadue-y-las-cosas-del-futbol>
Club de Deportes La Serena SADP (2012), Memoria anual 2011, La Serena, La Serena.
Club de Deportes La Serena SADP (2013), Memoria anual 2012, La Serena, La Serena.
Club de Deportes Santiago Wanderers SADP (2012), Memoria anual 2011, Santiago
Wanderers, Valparaiso.
22
Club de Deportes Santiago Wanderers SADP (2013), Memoria anual 2012, Santiago
Wanderers, Valparaiso.
Club Deportivo Palestino SADP (2012), Memoria anual 2011, Palestino, Santiago.
Club Deportivo Palestino SADP (2013), Memoria anual 2012, Palestino, Santiago.
Club Deportivo Unión San Felipe SADP (2012), Memoria anual 2011, San Felipe, San
Felipe.
Club Deportivo Unión San Felipe SADP (2013), Memoria anual 2012, San Felipe, San
Felipe.
Congreso Nacional (2005), Historia de la Ley N°20.019 – Regula las Sociedad Anónimas
mayor-penetracion-de-e-commerce-en-la-region/prontus_df/2013-07-
Deloitte (2011), Pressure to change: Annual Review of Football Finance, Sports Business
Deloitte (2013), Turn on, tune in, turnover: Annual Review of Football Finance - Highlights,
Deportes Unión La Calera SADP (2012), Memoria anual 2011, Unión La Calera, La
Calera.
Deportes Unión La Calera SADP (2013), Memoria anual 2012, Unión La Calera, La
Calera.
Emol (2002), ‘Sifup confirma huelga del fútbol’, Emol [Online], available at:
<http://www.emol.com/noticias/deportes/2002/08/26/93344/sifup-confirma-huelga-
Emol (2010), ‘¿En qué están los estadios de la Red Bicentenario?’, Emol [Online],
Estadio Seguro (2013), Público Fútbol Chileno 2013, Gobierno de Chile, Santiago.
<http://www.elgraficochile.cl/crisis/prontus_elgrafico/2012-10-02/082414.html>
Gutierrez, A. (2010), Bringing spectators back into Chilean stadiums, Master’s Thesis.
La Segunda (2012), ‘Diputados piden aclarar “históricos vínculos económicos entre clubes
<http://www.lasegunda.com/Noticias/Politica/2012/04/736815/Diputados-piden-
aclarar-historicos-vinculos-economicos-entre-clubes-y-barras-bravas> (accessed
15 January 2014).
25
edition.
Obregón, P. (2013), ‘Fútbol suma 509 sanciones de la SVS por no cumplir normas del
<http://www.economiaynegocios.cl/noticias/noticias.asp?id=110451> (accessed 15
December 2013).
<http://www.biobiochile.cl/2015/01/30/cdf-entregara-record-de-excedentes-a-
clubes-nacionales-la-u-colo-colo-y-uc-los-mas-beneficiados.shtml> (accessed 28
April 2015).
Santiago.
Segurola, S. (2015), ‘Del cero al infinito, pasando por Bielsa’, Marca.com [Online],
Sturgess, B. (2009), Football in Chile – Current Status, Growth Potential and Constraints,
Football Investor.
Unión Española SADP (2012), Memoria anual 2011, Unión Española, Santiago.
26
Unión Española SADP (2013), Memoria anual 2012, Unión Española, Santiago.
Table 1: Revenue Mix Comparison (Source: Deloitte, 2013, p. 7, and Clubs’ Annual
Reports)
Table 2: Revenue Mix Comparison without Big 3 (Source: Deloitte, 2013, p. 7, and Clubs’
Annual Reports)
27% 16%
60% 16% 15%
16% 11%
40% 17%
Table 3: Football vs Retail (Source: Clubs’ annual reports and Falabella’s annual reports,
Football vs Retail
€ 35.000.000 € 31.458.877 € 31.439.644
€ 30.000.000
€ 25.000.000
€ 20.000.000
€ 15.000.000
€ 10.000.000 € 6.174.579 € 7.092.702
€ 5.000.000
€0
2011 2012
Attendances
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0