1

CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SUMMARY:

SOURCES AND DEFINITIONS

Binding sources
1. The constitution
2. Legislation
3. Common law
4. Case law
5. International law

Constitutional law: is the sum total of binding rules relating to the

distribution and exercise of state authority. The rules of constitutional
law define the relationship between organs of state and between
organs of state and individuals

The dividing line between public and private law has become blurred:
1. The state has become involved in private relationships –
employer and employee, landlord and tenant and husband and
wife.
2. The constitution states that private relationships are often
unequal – bill of rights apply to private relationships
3. Public functions have become increasingly privatized – Telkom
and Transnet

What makes our government different from the previous

dispensation is:
• The fact that we have an inflexible constitution
• Our constitution is supreme
• We apply certain aspects of the rule of law
• We are both a formal and material rechstaat
• We are a democratic state
• Constitutional democracy
• Separation of powers limits the power of government

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 2
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

Flexible constitution: enjoys the Inflexible constitution: enjoys

same status as the other laws of superior status to the ordinary
the country and requires no laws of the land and require a
special procedure for amendment special amendment procedure.
e.g. SA constitution of 1961 E.g. SA 1996 constitution
S74:

Supreme constitution Not supreme:

Ranks above all other laws in a Doesn’t enjoy any special status
state = Any law which is The legislature can pass laws,
inconsistent with it will be which are inconsistent with the
declared invalid constitution. The courts cant
E.g. SA 1996 constitution question the validity of such laws,
provided the correct procedure
has been complied with
E.g. Britain

Autochthonous and allochthonous constitutions

Autochthonous: are said to be indigenous and allochthonous are
borrowed constitutions.

Van der Vyver said there are 3 kinds of constitutions:

1. Reactive constitution: which was the result of specific problems
in the past and which seeks to resolve those problems =
indigenous
2. There are constitutions which are intended to maintain the
continuity with established norms in legal tradition of the
society concerned – indigenous
3. Superimposed constitutions: the contents of the constitution
are unrelated to the history of the country concerned

State:
1. Geographically defines territory
2. Community of people who live on the territory
3. A legal order
4. An organized system of government to uphold legal order
5. Separate political identity

The rule of law

1. The absence of arbitrary power: no one is above the law and no
one is punishable except for a distinct breach of the law
2. Equality before the law: every individual is subject to the
ordinary law and the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts.
3. A judge made constitution

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 3
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

The Rechstaat principle

Refers to a government by law and not by force.
Formal rechstaat: requires Material Rechstaat: the state
compliance with: authority is bound by higher legal
1. Due process values, which are embodied in the
2. Separation of powers constitution.
3. Legal certainty

Constitutional mechanisms to limit the powers of the

government:
1. Bill of rights
2. The constitution is subject to judicial review
3. Democratic elections of representatives to parliament
4. Collective and individual responsibility of cabinet to parliament
5. Separation of powers between the legislature, executive and
judiciary
6. An independent judiciary
7. The demarcation between the national and provincial spheres of
government

Democracy:
S1 of the constitution proclaims that SA is a democratic state
GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE
Democracy is derives from ancient Greek words demos (the people)
and Kratos (strength) – this implies that a democracy is a government
by the people.

Direct democracy: Representative democracy: the

means that all the major political citizens of the state elect a
decisions are made by the people representative and then the
themselves – may work in a small representative exercises their
community where the people can wishes. all the inhabitants of the
meet on a regular basis and state should via direct
decide matters representation, have a say in
which the state is governed –
usually be being represented in
the legislature. It’s created by
elections, which need to be held
at regular intervals.

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 4
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

Criticisms of direct democracy:

 The people cant be said to govern in any real sense if they go to
the polls once every 4 or 5 years to elect representatives who are
free to govern as they see fit

On the other hand its stated that it’s the only workable form of
democracy in modern times
Features:
1. Free and regular elections (4 or 5 years)
2. Multi party system
3. Universal adult suffrage
4. The protection of minorities
5. Mechanisms to ensure the accountability of government to the
electorate

Constitutional democracy:
In addition to being a representative democracy SA is also a
constitutional democracy. This means that the peoples representatives
in parliament, in the provincial legislatures and in municipal councils
aren’t free to make whatever laws they wish, but are bound to observe
the values in the constitution. Laws that are inconsistent with the
constitution will be declared invalid.

Parliamentary and presidential systems of government:

Presidential system Parliamentary system

1. The head of government is 1. The head of state and head
also head of state (SA) of government are 2
2. The head of government different people
isn’t a member of the 2. The head of government
legislature and isn’t and his cabinet are
responsible to it members of the legislature
3. The head of government is and are responsible to it
elected directly by the 3. The head of government is
people the leader of the party with
a clear majority in
parliament (SA)

Separation of powers:
Montesquieu is regarded as the father of the doctrine of separation of
powers (Trias politica), according to the traditional view, the doctrine
separated executive, legislature and judiciary. According to him there
can be no political freedom in a country where one person makes the
law, enforces the law and provides sanctions when the law is
contravened.

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 5
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

Carpenter states that the doctrine implies the following:

1. The formal division of state authority into the legislature,
executive and judiciary
2. Separation of personnel so that one person shouldn’t
simultaneously perform in more than one branch of government
= Certification Case: it was argued that the new constitutional text
didn’t comply with one of the constitutional principles, cabinet
members remain members of parliament. The overlap between the
legislative and executive in the new constitution serves an NB
check and balance = it ensures accountability of the executive
towards the voters.
3. Separation of function: so that one branch cant usurp on the
powers and functions of the other branches
• Legislature: make and amend law
• Executive: enforce and execute
• Judiciary: Interpret and apply
4. Checks and balances: with each branch of government given
specific powers to restrain other branches and therefore achieve
equilibrium among the 3 components of government authority.
SA constitution provides for checks and balances. The most NB
is judicial review, which allows legislative or administrative
action to be tested for validity in court. The judiciary must
ensure government acts comply with procedural and
substantive requirements of the constitution.

The counter majoritarian debate

Arguments to defend judicial review:
1. SA constitution was made by the representatives of the people
in the constitutional assembly. It had to be adopted by 2/3
majority of the CA and it came from lengthily negotiations and
democratic deliberation.
2. Democracy presupposed political debate, in which citizen’s feel
they can state their views and challenge-accepted beliefs.
Judicial review may contribute to this
3. Judges may enquire into the constitutionality of legislation, but
they don’t substitute their view for those of the legislature. If a
judge strikes down a law as unconstitutional she doesn’t make
a new law. The legislature any amend the law – the only
condition being that it must be constitutional

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 6
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY

Functions of the NA Functions of the NCOP

S42 (3): S42 (4):
1. Representation of the 1. Representation of provinces
electorate in the national sphere
2. Election of the president 2. Participation in the national
3. Public consideration of legislative process
issues 3. Public consideration of
4. Passing legislation issues effecting provinces
5. overseeing executive action

Elections:
S19: guarantees the right of every adult citizen to vote.
August case the issue of the voting of prisoners came before the court.
The 1993 Electoral Act: declared that no person will be entitled to
vote who was convicted of murder, rape, robbery with aggravating
circumstances or an attempt to commit these crimes

1998 electoral act: the following are disqualified:

1. Persons who applied for registration fraudulently or in a way
other than the prescribed manner
2. Persons who aren’t SA citizens
3. Persons declared mentally ill by the high court
4. Persons detained under the Mental Health Act
5. Persons not normally resident in the district where registration
was applied for
Prisoners weren’t disqualified = Enfranchisement of prisoners could be
achieved by setting up polling stations in prisons or by giving special
votes to prisoners

In the New National Party of SA: the issue was that only people with
bar coded ID’s were allowed to vote, the majority of the court found he
requirement wasn’t unconstitutional

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 7
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

Proportional and territorial representation

Territorial representation: a person is elected by people in a particular
geographical area (constituency) to represent them in parliament
Advantages Disadvantages

1. Simple 1. Incorrectly reflects the

2. strong and stable strength of the parties
government 2. Favors the stronger parties
3. Results in a closer bond to the detriment of the
between the representative weaker parties
and the voter 3. Artificial delineation of
constituencies can give rise
to an imbalance between
constituencies

Proportional representation: all parties participating in the election get

representation corresponding with the votes obtained with those
parties in the election

Advantages Disadvantages
1. Provides for reflection of the 1. May lead to a weak
voters opinion unstable government as it
2. Eliminates problems in may be impossible for one
respect of delimitation of party to obtain absolute
electoral districts majority
3. All votes carry the same 2. No contact between the
weight voter and the representative
4. Accommodates wider 3. Often complicated
representation of parties 4. Often fails to produce a
than territorial clear majority
representation
5. Minorities can form
coalitions against the
majority parties and
therefore avoid dominance
by the majority

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 8
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

Free and imperative mandate theory of representation

Free mandate theory: a member Imperative mandate theory: a

of parliament isn’t bound by the member of parliament is bound
mandate given to him by the by the mandate given to him by
electorate but he must act in his principal (the electorate) – if
accordance with his own he disagrees with his party he
conscience and the interests of must vacate his seat
the country as a whole

Does SA follow a free or imperative mandate theory?

The ‘96’ constitution doesn’t provide that a member of parliament who
crosses to another political party has top vacate his seat, therefore the
constitution restores the concept of free mandate. BUT imperative
mandate is still in force

UDM case: 4 acts of parliament

The effects of the legislation for those members wishing to defect were
as follows:
1. Immediately after the amendments were effected, members were
given a 15 day window period in which they could change party
allegiance without losing their seats
2. The amendments make provision for a 15 day period in
September of the 2nd and 4th year after a general election when
the members are allowed to cross the floor without losing their
seats
3. Parties that are represented in parliament are entitled to merge
or separate during those periods
4. Permission to cross the floor and for parties to divide is only
required if at least 10% of the members of the party defect or
break away

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 9
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

Parliamentary privileges
• The NA controls its own internal arrangements, proceedings and
procedures
• Parliament can summon people to give evidence and submit
documents
• They can enforce their own internal disciplinary measures for
contempt of parliament
• Members of parliament may not vote on any matter in which
they have a financial interest

ARE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGES SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL

REVIEW?
De Lille case:
De Lille was suspended from the NA after making allegations that
certain ANC officials had been spies for the apartheid regime.
NA argued that the assembly had exercised a parliamentary privilege
to control its own affairs and that the exercise of the privilege wasn’t
subject to the review power of the courts.

the exercises of parliamentary privileges must be consistent with the

constitution. It was found that De Lille’s suspension amounted to an
unjustified infringement of her constitutional rights to freedom of
speech, just administrative action and access to the courts.
A suspension of a member of parliament for contempt isn’t consistent
with the requirements of a representative democracy – that would be a
punishment which was calculated to penalize not only the member
but also his party and members of the electorate who voted for that
party and who are entitled to be represented in the assembly.

When the president may refer a bill to the constitutional court for
a decision on its constitutionality: Liquor Bill case:
S79
The liquor bill was in the NA it passed through the various legislative
stages in terms of S76 before parliament approved it.
When the bill was sent to the president for assent he declined to
approve it, as he had reservations about its constitutionality, so it was
referred back to the NA.
1. Must the court only consider the presidents reservations or can
it direct wider attention – the court considers only the president
reservations
2. Should the court examine every provision to certify that every
part accords with the constitution – NO the court must 1st
consider the reservations of the president
3. Does the courts finding in respect of the constitutionality of the
bill mean that its provisions cant be adjudicated after its
enactment – even if the court does decide that the bill is
constitutional, supervening constitutional challenges after its
enactment aren’t excluded

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 10
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

S74: Bills amending S76: Bills affecting S75: Bills not

the constitution the provinces affecting the
provinces
S1 – may be amended Bill must be referred If both pass the bill
by a bill passed by: to the NCOP if houses its sent to the
The NA with a 75% introduced by NA and president for assent.
majority of the visa versa There is no mediation
members If both houses agree committee.
The NCOP – 6/9 it’s sent to Pres for The NA may still pass
provinces supporting assent. a bill, which has been
the vote If they disagree, its rejected by the NCOP
sent to a medication without co-operation
Chapter 2 may be committee who can: from the NCOP
amended by: • Use NA version
Na with a 2/3 • Use NCOP When the NCOP votes
majority vote of version in S75 each delegate
members • Make own in a provincial
NCOP – 6/9 provinces version delegation has one
supporting vote If there is still a vote and the question
dispute the NA can is decided on the
Any other provision in override it with a majority of votes
the constitution may 2/3rd majority and passed.
be amended by a bill send the bill to the
passed by: pres for assent
NA with a 2/3
majority When the NCOP
NCOP – 6/0 provinces votes, its one vote per
supporting vote if the province
amendment:
Relates to a matter
affecting the council
Alters provincial
boundaries, powers,
functions
Amends a provision
dealing with a
provincial matter

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 11
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

Limitations on parliaments power to make laws

1. Fundamental rights limitations
2. Federalism limitations
3. Separation of powers limitations
4. Delegation limitations
5. Limitation on the power to amend the constitution
6. Procedural limitations
7. Extra parliamentary consultation

Federalism limitations

Can parliament delegate their power to MAKE AND AMEND law??

MAKE LAW:
Executive Council of Western Cape: The authority of parliament to
delegate its law making functions is subject to the constitution.
The authority to make subordinate legislation may be exercised by
the executive:
• Proclamations by the president
• Regulations by ministers
The court held that there is nothing in the constitution-prohibiting
parliament from delegating subordinate regulatory authority to
another – its necessary for effective law making

AMEND LAW:
Chaskelson
Subordinate legislation: power to make and implement laws for the
republic.
Plenary power is the power to amend or repeal legislation.
Legislature may delegate subordinate legislation to the executive but
not plenary power.

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 12
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY
Powers of the president S84 (2): the president is responsible for:
a) Assenting to and signing bills
b) Referring a bill to the NA for reconsideration of constitutionality
c) Referring a bill to the constitutional court for a decision on its
constitutionality
d) Summoning the NA, NCOP or parliament to an extraordinary
sitting to conduct special business

Presidents prerogatives
A prerogative is a discretionary power exercised at will – they are
common law discretionary powers possessed by the leader of a state
by virtue of his pre-eminence over other citizens
Common law prerogatives previously enjoyed by the president
• Conclude treaties
• Declare war
• Make peace
• Confer honorary titles
• Pardon offenders
• Appoint a commission of enquiry

Q: are the powers of the president in terms of S84 subject to

constitutional review?
Hugo: the CC considered the question whether the president’s power
to pardon offenders is subject to constitutional review. This power,
which was a prerogative power of the crown, is recognized in the ‘93’
and ‘96’ constitutions. The court was of the opinion that the only
prerogative, which was still in force, are those in the constitution. The
exercise of these powers is subject to constitutional review.

Explain how the president must conduct himself when:

1. He acts together with other members of cabinet:
The functionary who had to be consulted had to concur
E.g. appointment of judges = is BOUND

2. He acts after consulting other functionaries:

the president must consult the relevant functionary
E.g. by appointing judges of the constitutional court =NOT
BOUND

3. He acts on recommendation of or advice of other

functionaries:
The constitution stipulates that the president must exercise
certain powers “on recommendation of” other functionaries. I.e.
the president may remove a judge from office if the JSC has
made a finding in respect of this and the NA calls for the judge
to be removed – president is BOUND to act as advised

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 13
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

Individual and collective ministerial responsibility

Collective responsibility: signifies Individual responsibility confers 3

that members of cabinet act in duties on the minister concerned:
unison with the outside world and 1. To explain to parliament
carry joint responsibility before what happens in his
parliament for the way in which department
each member exercises and 2. To acknowledge that
performs powers and functions something has gone wrong
in the department and
rectify the mistake
3. To resign if the situation is
serious enough

HOW PARLIAMENT CONTROLS THE EXECUTIVE:

1. Individual and collective ministerial accountability
2. question time in parliament
3. Interpellations are used to enter into short debates with
ministers on particular aspects of their responsibilities
4. Parliamentary committees
5. approval by parliament of subordinate legislation
6. Parliament has to authorize the raising of taxes and spending of
funds by the executive
7. S89 – removal of the president from office by the NA. Resolution
must be adopted by 2/3 majority of members in the NA and it
may only occur on grounds of serious violation of the law or the
constitution
8. S102 – motions of no confidence in the president, or conduct
excluding the president. If the motion is adopted, he must
resign with other members of cabinet. If a motion of no
confidence in the cabinet, excluding the president is adopted
the president must reconstitute cabinet

When the president is bound to comply with S33:

S33 guarantees the right to just administrative action- it was argued
in the SARFU case that the president, in appointing a commission of
enquiry into the administration of rugby, didn’t act in the manner that
was procedurally fair
Q: whether the president had to comply with S33 when appointing
commission of enquiry? It was concluded that the president’s power to
appoint a commission of enquiry isn’t administrative action.
The test for determining whether conduct is administrative action:
how is the president acting?
- as head of state (don’t have to comply with S33)
- as head of the national executive = comply with
S33

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 14
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

President giving evidence in a civil matter in open court:

SARFU case:
Why it isn’t desirable in the opinion of the court to compel the
president to testify in open court:
 the president isn’t in the same position as other witnesses.
 The doctrine of separation of powers requires the court to
protect the status, dignity and efficiency of the office of the
president and the president should only be required to give
evidence orally in open court in civil matters relating to
performance of official duties in exceptional circumstances.

Circumstances where the president can be compelled to testify:

 where a head of state may be called as a witness special
arrangements are made for the way in which evidence is given.

2 conflicting considerations:
a) Public interest in ensuring protection of dignity, status and
efficiency of the office of president
b) Need to ensure the administration of justice isn’t impeded
Therefore careful consideration must be given to a decision compelling
the president to give evidence and such order should be made unless
administration of justice demands it.

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 15
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
1. Constitutional court
2. Supreme court of appeal
3. High court
4. Magistrate court
5. Courts created by acts of parliament – Labour court

How the independence of the judiciary is secured through

appointment measures in the constitution:
The JSC advised the government on matters in respect of the
judiciary, by making recommendations in respect of appointment,
removal from office, term of office and tenure of judges.
The involvement of the JSC in the appointment of judges was believed
to restrict the power of the executive to appoint whomever they wished
and thus boost judicial independence.

Judicial independence
Functional independence:
Judicial officers exercise their power subject only to the law and the
constitution and not to public opinion.

Functional independence of the courts in SA have been threatened

1950’s when parliament tried to set up a high court of parliament
which would have the power to set aside decisions of the appellate
division of the supreme court. The creation of the high court of
parliament was parliaments response to an earlier decision of the AD
in Harris case – n which it declared the Separate Representation of
Voters Act unconstitutional which aimed to remove colored voters
from the voters role – the High court of parliament reversed the
decision in Harris and upheld the validity of the act.

In the 2nd Harris case it was argued that parliament was assuming the
role and functions of the court and was trying to act as judge, jury
and executioner.
the act was therefore invalidated

Another factor, which contributed to the functional independence of

the courts, is the fact that judicial officers enjoy immunity against
civil actions and the offence of contempt of court.
May v Udwin: public interest in the due administration of justice
requires that a judicial officer, in exercising his functions, should be
able to speak his mind freely without fear of incurring liability

Personal independence

Personal independence is protected in the following ways:

a) JSC plays an NB role in the appointment of judges
b) S176 provides that judges of the constitutional court are
appointed for a non-renewable term of 12 years – but they

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 16
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

must retire at the age of 70. Other judges may serve office
until the age of 75 or until they are discharged from active
service in terms of an act of parliament = judges enjoy
security of tenure so there is no need for them to seek
favour from politicians to make sure that they keep their
jobs
c) The constitution makes it difficult for the executive to
dismiss judges – S177: the president may remove a judge
from office only if the JSC finds that he suffers from
 an incapacity,
 is grossly incompetent or
 is guilty of gross misconduct and if the NA calls for
his removal by a resolution adopted with the
support of 2/3 of its members
d) S176 provides that the salaries, allowances and other
benefits of judicial officers may not be reduced

Circumstances under which direct access to the constitutional

court may be sought:
Bruce v Feecytex
S167 (6) of the ‘96’ constitution – national legislation or the rules of
the constitutional court must allow a person when its in the interests
of justice and with the leave of the constitutional court:
a) To bring the matter directly to the constitutional court or
b) To appeal directly to the constitutional court from any other
court

5 techniques the courts use to avoid or limit the effects of a

declaration of invalidity
S172 a competent court has the power to declare any law or conduct
that’s inconsistent with the constitution invalid to the extent of its
inconsistency.

AVOID: LIMIT:
1. If possible a court should declare any law/conduct
decide a case on grounds inconsistent with the constitution
other than a constitutional invalid to the extent of the
ground inconsistency (severance)
2. Where possible courts A court may limit the
should interpret a retrospective effect of a
provision in such a way declaration of invalidity
that it doesn’t conflict with A court may suspend a
the constitution declaration of invalidity for any
period and on any conditions in
order to allow the competent
authority the chance to correct

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 17
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNMENT
S40: the government of the Republic is constituted as the national,
provincial and local sphere which are distinctive, interdependent and
interrelated.

Unitary form of government:

It has a unified center of authority – all government bodies are subject
to the authority exercised by the national government
Characteristics:
1. Power is concentrated in the hands of the national sphere of the
government
2. Greater emphasis is placed on centralization than
decentralization.
3. The provinces are subordinate to the national government

Federal system

Divided model of federalism Integrated model of federalism

1. Powers and responsibilities 1. Few area in which the
of the national and national government enjoys
provincial levels of exclusive power and many
government are clearly areas in which the national
divided and provinces have shared
responsibility

2. Provinces are given 2. Revenues and taxing powers

independent taxing powers are shared between the
national and provincial
governments
3. Even though mechanisms 3. A number of intergovernmental
exist for the co-operation institutions have the
between the national and responsibility of promoting co-
provincial governments they operation between the various
have no status or levels of government
constitutional recognition
4. Provincial interests aren’t 4. Provinces are able to put their
represented within the interests directly into the national
national government legislative process – NCOP
E.g. Canada

Simeon says that SA follows a more integrated form of federalism than

a divided one. This is evident from the following:

1. Chapter 3 of the constitution is entitled “Co-operative

Government” – S40 states that the government is constituted as
the national, provincial and local sphere which are distinctive,
interdependent and interrelated.

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 18
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

2. The fact that the constitution refers to spheres and not level
creates the impression that the aim is to move away from the
hierarchy
3. The constitution has a list of functional areas in which the
national, provincial and local areas share legislative functions
4. Provinces have limited powers to raise revenues for themselves
and are barred from imposing income, sales or VAT
5. S41 (2): requires an Act of parliament to establish or provide for
structures or institutions to promote or facilitate
intergovernmental relations and provide for appropriate
mechanisms to settle intergovernmental disputes
6. S41 (3): an organ of state involved in an intergovernmental
dispute must make every reasonable effort to resolve the dispute
by means of mechanisms provided and must exhaust all
internal remedies before they approach a court to resolve it.
7. Provincial interest are represented in parliament in the NCOP –
which ensures that provincial interests are taken into account
on a national sphere

Discuss the issue of co-operative government in respect of the

Premier of the Western Cape v President of the RSA:
The government of the Western Cape challenged the constitutionality
of an amendment to the public service act. In terms of this
amendment, provincial heads of department are given the same
functions and responsibilities as national departments and no longer
fall under the administrative control of the provincial Director General

The Western Cape government objected that its part of the executive
power of a province to structure its own administration and the
national legislature, which wants to impose such structure on the
provinces, infringes the provincial power.
The court rejected this argument

The Western Cape government argued that the provision of the

amended legislation encroached on the geographical and functional
integrity of the provincial government contrary to S41.

S41: the spheres of government co-operate with each other to secure

the implementation of legislation in which they all have a common
interest. This co-operation requires that every reasonable effort be
made to settle disputes before a court is approached to do so.

S41 (1)(g) requires that: all spheres of government and all organs of
state within each sphere must exercise their powers and perform their
functions in a manner that doesn’t encroach on the geographical,
functional or institutional integrity of government in another sphere.

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 19
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

This reflects a requirement in the constitutional principles that the

national government won’t exercise its powers so to encroach on the
provinces.

The courts findings:

The provisions of the amendment dealing with the powers and
functions of the DG aren’t inconsistent with the executive power if the
province. Its also not been established that the provision infringes
S41.

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 20
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT
Legislative conflicts:
Conflict with a schedule 5 matter:
normally there wont be conflicts since provinces have the EXCLUSIVE
POWER to pass legislation relating to these matters.
BUT S44 (2): states that parliament may pass legislation on a matter
falling within a functional area listed in schedule 5 when it’s
necessary to:
• Maintain national security
• Maintain economic unity
• Maintain essential national standards
• Establish minimum standards required for the rendering of
services
• Prevent unreasonable action taken by a province which is
prejudicial to the interests of other provinces or to the country
as a whole

Legislative conflicts in schedule 4 matters

S146 (2) national legislation that applies uniformly with regard to the
whole country prevails if one of the following conditions is met:
1) The national legislation deals with a matter that cant be
regulated effectively by legislation enacted by the provinces
individually
2) The national legislation deals with a matter that requires
uniformity across the nation and the national legislation
provides that uniformity by establishing –
- Standards
- Frameworks or
- National policies
3) The national legislation is necessary for:
• Maintaining national security
• Maintaining economic unity
• Protection of the common market in respect of mobility of
goods services, capital and labour
• The promotion of economic activities across provincial
boundaries
• The promotion of equal opportunity or equal access to
government services
• The protection of the environment
4) National legislation prevails over provincial legislation if the
national legislation is aimed at preventing unreasonable action
by a province that:
- Is prejudicial to the economic, health or security interests
of another province or the country as a whole
- Impedes the implementation of national economic policy

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 21
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

public participation:
1. It facilitates access to information about local conditions, needs
and attitudes, which are NB in terms of adopting informed
decisions in the policy management
2. Participation provides people whose lives will be affected by the
proposed policies with the opportunity to express their views
and to attempt to influence public officials about the desirability
of the proposed policies
3. It means involving and educating the public
4. Provides mechanisms for ensuring democratization of the
planning process
5. Participation is a means of balancing the demands of central
control against the demands for concern for the unique
requirements of local government
6. Participation plays a watchdog role – this openness and
participation tends to reduce the possibility of corruption and
may help maintain high standards of behaviour.

Chapter 7 of the final constitution:

the constitutional recognition of local government and the vesting of
powers in local authorities have transformed the legal status of the
local government.

Fedsure: constitution – a local government is no longer a public body

exercising delegated powers – it’s a legislative assembly with legislative
and executive powers recognized by the constitution itself.
Local governments have a place in the constitutional order, have to be
established by a competent authority and are entitled to certain
powers, including he power to make by laws and impose rates.

Local government as a sphere of government: S151:

1) The local government consists of municipalities, which must be
established for the whole of the Republic
2) The executive and legislative authority of a municipality is
vested in its municipal council
3) A municipality has the right to govern, the local government
affairs of its community, subject to national and provincial
legislation.

Autonomous local government versus administrative handmaiden

S156 states that the local government can’t legislate in conflict
with national and provincial legislation
The national and provincial government must assign to local
government those local government matters that would be most

Critical Law Studies cc ©

 22
CLS cc
Constitutional Law Summary

effectively administered locally and where the local government

structure has the capacity to administer it.
Municipalities have powers reasonably necessary or incidental to the
effective performance of their functions.

Pimstone – says that this definition gives the impression that the local
government plays a administrative role, which is at odds with the
description of local government as a sphere that is autonomous and
one that enjoys original powers.

Critical Law Studies cc ©