Dokumen - Tips Reinterpreting The Caribbean 2001 by Norman Girvan

8/11/2019 Reinterpreting the Caribbean 2001 by Norman Girvan
Reinterpreting the Caribbean
- Norman Girvan –
To be published in New Caribbean Thought , Folke Lindahl and Brian Meeks, eds.,
Forthcoming, UWI Press, 2001

Definition
What constitutes the Caribbean? The answer is often a matter of perspective and of
context. Anglophones in the region usually speak and think of the Caribbean as meaning
the English- speaking islands, or the member states of the Caribbean Community
(Caricom). Sometimes the phrase “the wider Caribbean” is employed to refer to what is,
in effect, “the others”. In the Hispanic literature El Caribe refers either to the Spanish-
speaking islands only, or to Las Antillas — the entire islands chain. More recently a
distinction is being made between El Caribe insular — the islands—and El Gran Caribe —
the Greater Caribbean, or entire basin. Among scholars, “the Caribbean” is a socio-
historical category, commonly referring to a cultural zone characterised by the legacy of
slavery and the plantation system. It embraces the islands and parts of the adjoining
mainland— and may be extended to include the Caribbean Diaspora overseas. As one
scholar observes, there are many Caribbeans 1 .
This is reflected at the level of regional organisations. Caricom is primarily an

Anglophone grouping, recently expanded to include Suriname and in principle Haiti.
Cariforum, which groups the Caribbean signatories to the Lome Convention, includes
Caricom, Haiti and the Dominican Republic. The Association of Caribbean States (ACS)
embraces the entire basin. The majority of the dependent territories in the Caribbean do
not belong to Caricom, Cariforum or the ACS; but most are members of the Caribbean
Development and Co- operation Committee (CDCC) of ECLAC. The CDCC excludes the
majority of the basin states; its membership corresponds roughly to that of the insular
Caribbean.
In short the definition of the Caribbean might be based on language and identity,
geography, history and culture, geopolitics, geoeconomics, or organisation. The term
itself has an interesting history. It originated with the desire of the Spanish invaders to
demonise those groups of the earlier inhabitants that chose to resist them. Los Caribes
were allegedly the man- eaters (after the Spanish carne , for meat), and therefore deserving
of no mercy. Gaztambide-Geigel (1996: 76, 83) has shown that the derivative name only
began to be applied to the entire region towards the end of the 19 th century, in the context
of US expansion of its “southern frontier”. Later expressions of this were the Anglo -
American Caribbean Commission (later simply the Caribbean Commission) of 1942 and
Reagan’s Caribbean Basin Initiative of the 1980s. Both the name itself and its later
application to a geographical zone were inventions of imperial powers.
1
Gaztambide-Geigel 1996: 84
1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reinterpreting-the-caribbean-2001-by-norman-girvan 1/17
Table 1. Many Caribbeans

Name Scope Characterisation Institutions
Caribbean Basin Mainland & islands Geo- political/hegemonic CBI
(US) Caribbean 1
Greater Mainland & islands Geo- economic/co- ACS
(“El Gran Caribe”) operative
Greater Caribbean 2 Mainland & islands Geo- social/counter - CRIES, Civil
(“El Gran Caribe”) hegemonic Forum
Plantation Caribbean Islands, the three Ethno- historic/counter - CSA
or “African Central Guianas, and hegemonic
America” “Caribbean” /black
communities on the
mainland
Insular or Island Islands, the three Ethno- historic CDCC, ACE,
Caribbean
Caribbean of
Guianas and Belize
Anglophone states, Economic co- operative, CPDC
CARICOM
CARICOM Suriname, strong cultural &
Monsterrat linguistic ties
Caribbean of ACP CARICOM, Neo-colonial/negotiation, CARIFORUM
Dominican in transition
Republic, Haiti
Notes.
ACE Association of Caribbean Economists
ACP African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of countries signatories to the Lome Convention with the
European Union (EU).
CARICOM Caribbean Community. Members are 13 Anglophone states, Suriname, and Montserrat, a British
dependent territory. Haiti has been admitted in principle but the formalities have not yet been
completed.
CARIFORUM Caribbean members of the ACP Group. Members are CARICOM, the Dominican Republic and
Haiti
ACS Association of Caribbean States. Members are all states of the Greater Caribbean plus three
French dependencies (non-ratified associate members).
CBI Caribbean Basin Initiative
CDCC Caribbean Development and Co-operation Committee of ECLAC, the Economic Commission
for Latin America and the Caribbean. Members are all states of the insular Caribbean only, plus
the Dutch and US dependent territories and three British dependent territories.
Civil Forum Forum of Civil Society of the Greater Caribbean
CPDC Caribbean Policy Development Centre, an umbrella grouping of NGOs of the insular Caribbean
CRIES Regional Coordination of Economic and Social Research, a network of research centres linked
with NGOs
CSA Caribbean Studies Association
2
What is significant is the subsequent re -invention of the concept of Caribbean by native
scholars as expressions of intellectual and political resistance. This was especially notable
in the case of the New World Group, which emerged in the Anglophone Caribbean in the
1960s. Drawing on the insights of the American anthropologist Charles Wagley and
building on the earlier work of the radical nationalists C.L.R. James (1938)2 and Eric
3
Williams (1944,Ame
of “Plantation 1970) , theSimilarities
rica”. group articulated a vision
of history andof culture
the Caribbean as an to
were held integral part
outweigh
differences in language or colonial power. In the words of Best
Certainly (the Caribbean) includes the Antilles — Greater and Lesser — and the
Guianas… But many times the Caribbean also includes the littoral that surrounds
our sea... what we are trying to encompass within our scheme is the cultural,
social, political and economic foundation of the “sugar plantation” variant of the
colonial mind (Best 1971: 7)4 .
For Best, this definition was the foundational step in establishing the link between
intellectual thought and Caribbean freedom. Striking parallels exist in the positions taken
by the Haitian anthropologist Jean Casimir (1991:75- 77) and the Puerto Rican historian
Gaztambide- Geigel (1996: 90- 92). The latter regards the Caribbean as constituting Afro -
America Central ( “Central Afro- America”); and calls this as the ethno -historic
conception of the region.
Yet the counter- hegemonic concept of Caribbean is not limited to the ethno- historic
per spective. The “basin” perspective of the hegemonic power has been inverted by some
as a sphere of resistance. This vision, which Gaztambide- Geigel characterises as
Tercermundista ( “Thirdworldist”) dates back at least to the 1940s and has been
articulated by elites in Mexico, Colombia and Venezuela, the so - called “G3” countries. In
contemporary times it finds expression in the ACS and in the Civil Society Forum of the
Greater Caribbean, an NGO grouping. However these organisations emphasise co-
operation in furtherance of common interests as their objective; any counter - hegemonic
aspirations, if they are present, are muted rather than explicit.
Hence the notion of Caribbean has been, and is being, continuously re -defined and re-
interpreted in response to external influences and to internal currents. A plausible
2
James’s book on the Haitian revolution, The Black Jacobins, was reissued in 1962 with a new appendix
called “From Toussaint L’Ouverture to Fidel Castro”. It has gone through many editions, has been
published in French and Italian, and strongly influenced the consciousness of several generations of
Anglophone Caribbean intellectuals.
3
Williams, a Trinidadian historian who later led the nationalist movement and became the first Prime
Minister of Trinidad and Tobago, analysed the connection between slavery, the slave trade and the rise of
British industrial capitalism. He worked for the Caribbean Commission in Puerto Rico before entering
Trinidadian politics. In 1970, the same year that Williams’s From Colum bus to Castro came out, the
Dominican Republic nationalist leader Juan Bosch published a book in Spanish with a virtually identical
st
name (Bosch 1983; 1 ed. 1970)
4
Originally published in 1967. The same passage makes clear that Best’s conception of the C aribbean
stretched as far as Recife in Brazil and the Carolinas in the United States. See also Beckford’s classic
Persistent Poverty (Beckford 1972)
3
position is that there is no one “correct” definition: content depends on context, but it
should be clearly specified whenever used for descriptive or analytical purposes (see for
instance Table 1). Conceptually, we find it useful to distinguish just the two variants of
the insular Caribbean (a socio- historical rather than geographic category since includes
the islands, the three Guianas and Belize); and the Greater Caribbean (the entire basin).
Organi
and ofsationally,
the ACS.itCulturally,
is necessary
theto growing
distinguish the Caribbean
importance of the Caricoma , of
of Diaspor of Cariforum,
the insular
Caribbean in North America and Europe has to be recognised. The Caribbean is not only
multilingual, it has also become transnational.
Identity
A parallel ambiguity arises regarding the existence of a common Caribbean “identity”.
Certainly the inhabitants of the region have been ambivalent about accepting a definition
that was originally imposed from without and is still today very much an intellectual or
political creation. Central Americans have always preferred to identify themselves as
belonging to “the Isthmus” and to call their Eastern Coast “the Atlantic”. In the Hispanic
islands, the nationalist current identified itself with Latin America on cultural, linguistic
and historical grounds. Self - definition as “Caribbean” was problematic insofar as it
connoted a denial of their Hispanic identity historically associated with US expansionism.
It also meant being grouped with islands that were non - Hispanic, still under colonial rule
and overwhelmingly black. As recently as 1987 a leading Puerto Rican writer was
asserting:
“For us Puerto Ricans the term antillean has clear significance, but not the terms
Caribbean or Caribbeanness . The former makes us part of the historical and
cultural experience of the Greater Antilles, the latter... imposes on us a
suprahistorical category, an invented object of a sociological, anthropological and
ethnological character that is anglophone in origin, and that functions against the
colonized person, as Fanon pointed out”. (Rodriguez Julio 1988).
Fidel Castro must have been acutely aware of the divisiveness and implicitly ethnic
orientation of this current when he declared in 1976 that Cuba is a “Latin African” rather
than Latin American nation, and more recently when he asserted that “the Caribbean
people of African origin are a part of Our America” (Castro 1999).
An analogous ambivalence is evident among the no n - Hispanics. Up to the middle of the

20th century the majority of these islands remained simply “The West Indies” or “The
Antilles” — British, French, and Dutch — and their inhabitants were known as West
Indians or Antilleans. Haiti, which had been isolated since its Independence a century
earlier, was African, Francophone, and uniquely Haitian. It was not until the 1940s that
“the Caribbean” began to acquire some currency in the European West Indian colonies.
This was originally as a result of the activities of the (Anglo-American) Caribbean
Commission and subsequently that of the work of regional historians and social
scientists.
4
For Anglophones, the terminological transition was signaled when the ill- fated West
Indies Federation of the 1950s was replaced by the Caribbean Free Trade Association
(CARIFTA) of the 1960s and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the Caribbean
Development Bank of the 1970s. The first two were, however, founded as exclusively
Anglophone clubs. Anglophones still display a certain discomfort with the expansive
definition of the by
fear domination region: theypopulous
the more guard their “West counties.
Hispanic Indian” identity
This wasjealously
reflectedand appear
in the to
name,
and the Report, of the Independent West Indian Commission, set up by the Caricom
Heads of Government of 1992. The Commission recommended that Caricom’s
integration efforts should be deepened rather than widened; the objective of widening
regional co- operation would be pursued through the formation of the ACS, a looser form
of association n(WICOM 1992).
It might be said that Hispanics tend to see themselves as Caribbean and Latin American ,
Anglophones as Caribbean and West Indian . “West Indian” might also incorporate
elements of pan-Africanism or pan- Hinduism that are either weak or non -existent in the
Hispanic societies. Identity may overlap in name but may be in contradiction in content.
The process of forming a common Caribbean psycho- cultural identity that transcends
barriers of language and ethnicity is at best slow and uneven.
For their part the Dutch islands still call themselves “Antilles” although they have joined
several Caribbean regional organisations. The French territories have the status of
Overseas Departments of the French Republic and their inhabitants are French citizens.
Here, self - definition as “Caribbean” is still relatively rare and when used, might connote
an assertion of distinct cultural identity and perhaps a demand for greater autonomy.
In what follows we examine the principal socio - economic characteristics of the Greater
Caribbean and the insular Caribbean.
Socio-economic characteristics
Within the countries of the Greater Caribbean there are wide disparities in size,
population, and per capita income, (see Annex Table 1 for detailed data). The grouping is
dominated by the G3 countries, which together account for between two - thirds and three-
quarters of the total population, GDP and land area (Table 2) . Mexico alone with 90
million people has a greater population than all the other countries combined and 46
percent of the aggregate GDP. Colombia’s population is about equal to that of entire
insular Caribbean with a GDP that exceeds that of the 16 independent states. Venezuela
has over three times the population and four times the GDP of the whole of Caricom. Per
capita income in the G3 is also higher than that of Central America and the non - Caricom
insular states and slightly below that of Caricom. Given the wide disparities in size
between the G3 and the rest, it is understandable that they should be regarded as “Latin
American powers in the Caribbean” with the potential to be significant economic and
political players in the region.
5
In analysing socio- economic characteristics, we have found it useful to distinguish four

subgroups that combine the attributes of political status, size, and location, while ignoring
distinctions of language, political system and regional association. The subgroups are:
(i) Larger Island States:

of the population, four
with states inpopulation
an average the Greater
ofAntilles
nearly 7containing
million. These -quarters
threeare Cuba,
the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Jamaica;
(ii) Smaller island states: nine states, mostly in the eastern and southern Caribbean
with populations under 1.5 million each and an average population size of
260,000. These are Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, the Bahamas and the six
members of the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States;
(iii) Mainland states : Suriname, Guyana, and Belize; and
(iv) Dependent territories , which number 12 in all.
Summary information on the subgroups are provided in table 3, with additional details on
human development and poverty in table 4.
Chart 1. The Caribbean: language
English- Dutch-
speaking Speaking
17% 1%
French- Spanish-
speaking speaking
22% 60%
Larger island states

The group of four island states with 75 percent of the sub- region’s population has
relatively low per capita incomes and modest levels of human development. It includes
Haiti, one of the poorest countries in the world with very low human development 7.
Cuba, the Dominican Republic and Jamaica are all in the $1,000 -2,000 range of per
capita income. Cuba has done best in terms of level of human development compared to
level of per capita income8, followed by Jamaica. The incidence of poverty is very high
in Haiti, where two- thirds of the population live below the poverty line; and significant in
Jamaica and the Dominican Republic where one-third and one- fifth of the population
respectively are estimated to be in absolute poverty. In Cuba one-sixth of the urban
po pulation is estimated to be at risk of being unable access their basic needs
requirements.
7
Haiti was ranked 159 th in the world HDI tables in 1998. It has slipped 34 places in ranking since 1991.
8
This is measured by the difference between the country’s GDP per capita rank and i ts HDI rank. For Cuba this was 18 in 1998 , for
Jamaica 9, for the Dominican Republic 1.
7
Table 3. Insular Caribbean: GDP, Population and Land Area

Per Capita Percent total
GDP 1995
(1)
GDP Population Land Area
L a r g e r I s l a n d S t a te s 1,101 30.3 75.9 27.6
S m a l l e r I s l a n d S t a t e s 5,215 12.0 6.4 3.0
M a i n l a n d 1,174 1.6 3.8 55.0
D e p e n d e n t t e r r i t o r i e s 11,099 56.1 13.9 14.4
T o t a l 2,759 100.0 100.0 100.0
Memo note: C a r i c o m 2,923 18.0 17.0 59.6
N o n -
C a r i c o m s t a t e s 1,036 25.0 69.1 26.0
(1) Weighted averages
Table 4. Insular Caribbean: Human Development, Growth and Poverty

Human HDI
GDP Per Capita 1995 US$ Development Change, Growth (2) Poverty
Category 1991-1998 (3)
(7)
Current Real PPP$(1) 1965- 80 1980-95
L a r g e r I s l a n d S t a t e s
Cuba 1,113 3,100 Medium -23 0.6 .. 15(5)
Dominican Republic 1,663 3,923 Medium -8 3.8 1.1 21
Haiti 285 917 Low -34 0.9 - 4 65(4)
Jamaica 1,762 3,801 Medium -25 -0.1 1.4 32
Smaller Island States
Antigua and Barbuda 6,640 9,131 High 17 -1.4 5.2(6) 12
Bahamas 12,258 15,738 High -4 1 -0.1 5(4)
Barbados 7,120 11,306 High - 2 3.5 1.2 8(4)
Dominica 2,574 6,424 High 12 -0.8 4.3 33
Grenada 2,344 5,425 High 13 0.1 3 20
St Kitts and Nevis 3,083 10,150 High 15 4 4.9 15
St Lucia 4,642 6,503 High 10 2.7 4.4 (6) 25
St Vincent 2,032 5,969 High 22 0.2 4.5 17
Trinidad and Tobago 4,101 9,437 High - 1 3.1 -1.5 21
Mainland
Belize 2,696 5,623 High 4 3.4 1.7 35
Guyana 809 3,205 Medium -11 0.7 -1.7 43
Suriname 1,066 4,862 Medium -10 5.5 3.4 47(4)
(1) Adjusts GDP for differences in purchasing power between countries. From UNDP HDR 1998
(2) Average annual real per capita GDP growth for period. From UNDP HDR 1998
(3) Proportion of population below income poverty, national poverty line estimate, 1989-94, except where otherwise
indicated. From UNDP HDR 1998
(4) Head Count Poverty Index, mid -1990s, as reported by World Bank 1996 p. 164
(5) Urban population at risk of not accessing supply of essential goods and services. From Ferriol 1998: 19
(6) 1980 -1993; from UNDP HDR 1997
(7) Change in global HDI rank, 1991-1998
8
All four countries have experienced low or negative real per capita growth over much or
most of the last two decades. This is due to falling commodity prices and debt and
adjustment crises (the Dominican Republic and Jamaica) exacerbated by the effects of
political turmoil (Haiti) and the collapse of the Soviet Union (Cuba). As a result, they
have lost substantial ground in their human development ranking in the world during the
1990s.
Smaller island states

This group of nine mini-states9, with less than 7 percent of the sub -region’s population,
enjoys levels of per capita income and of human development considerably higher than in
the larger island and mainland states. Their average p er capita income is 4.7 times that of
the larger island states, and they are all classified as having high human development in
the UNDP tables. Economic growth in the last two decades or in the 1990s has been
propelled by the expansion of tourism, off - sh ore banking services, manufacturing, banana
exports, and energy- based industries. Investment has also been strong due to political and
social stability and successful macro- economic management in the majority of cases. In
some of the smallest islands the f ruits of economic growth have been fairly widely
distributed due to the small populations, the dispersal of tourism and banana cultivation,
and strong public sending on social services.
Yet problems of poverty and vulnerability cast a shadow over the future of these
countries. In six of the nine countries the incidence of poverty is 15 percent or over, and
the rate reaches over 20 percent in Trinidad and Tobago and two of the Windward islands
and over 30 percent in Dominica. The Windward islands banana producing economies
are also threatened with severe dislocation due to a WTO ruling against the preferential
treatment they receive under the EU banana import regime (Lewis 1999). Vulnerability to
natural disasters is evident in the damage sustained in the Windward and Leeward islands
during the annual hurricane season, and in episodes such as the volcanic eruptions in
Montserrat, which have dislocated an entire island community. The islands’ strategic
location on the principal drug trafficking routes from South America to North America
and Europe has also exposed them to the activities of large international criminal
organisations whose resources vastly exceed those of the local state systems.
Mainland states
The three mainland states contain 55 percent of the land area but only 4 percent of the
population of the sub- region. In spite of their low population densities they are relatively
poor. Per capita incomes are similar to those of the larger islands, though Belize is
considerably richer on average than the other two. Both Guyana and Suriname have an
export structure that is dominated by primary commodities-- bauxite in the case of
Suriname and bauxite and sugar in the case of Guyana — and both have been negatively
affected by the weakening of commodity markets since the 1980s. Internal political
conflict has also contributed to economic decline. Suriname experienced an abrupt
withdrawal of Dutch aid in the 1980s following a military coup; while Guyana’s
9
The official United Nations classification of a mini- state is one with a population of less than 1.5 million.
9
economy suffered from brain drain and capital flight du ring the Burnham dictatorship of
the 1970s and the 1980s.
Dependent territories
The 12 dependent territories contain 14 percent of the sub- region’s population and have
relatively high
population and per
GDP.capita
Thisincomes.
territoryPuerto
has 10 Rico predominates
percent in this and
of the population subgroup in terms
42 percent of
of the
GDP of the insular Caribbean as a whole.
The factors behind the high incomes of the dependent territories are similar to those
applying to the smaller island states, with the additional advantages of dependent status.
Resource transfers to support social services are substantial in the US and French
dependencies. The British and Dutch dependencies have become major off -shore banking
centres, taking advantage of their political attractiveness associated with colonial
protection. Most of the dependent territories have large tourist industries and small
populations—a combination that inevitably results in high per capita incomes.
The Caribbean Diaspora

One consequence of these trends has been the continued growth of intra- regional
migration as well as of external migration flows. This is not a new phenomenon, as intra -
regional migration dates back to the end of the 19th century. Contemporary flows are
oriented to the expanding tourism and service economies of the smaller island and
dependent territories from the labour surplus, crisis - affected economies such as Haiti,
Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, Dominica and more recently Cuba. External
migration has also continued on a substantial scale. Although this phenomenon is not as
well researched as it ought to be, especially intra - Caribbean migration, the following
indicators are illustrative of its importance.
The net loss of population from the region in the 1950 - 1989 period has been estimated at
5.5 million (Guengant 1993; cited in Samuel 1996:8); which is about 15 percent of the
present population within the region. Haiti, Cuba, Jamaica and Puerto Rico each had
close to 1 million of their native-born population living abroad at the close of the 1980s.
In relation to the resident population, the overseas population at the end of the 1980s
stood at 40 percent for both Jamaica and Guyana, 36 percent for Suriname, 23 percent for
Puerto Rico, 21 percent for Trinidad and Tobago, 15 percent for Haiti, and 10 percent for
Cuba. By the early 1990s the overseas population was sending home in remittances an
amount equal to 71 percent of the value of exports in the case of the Dominican Republic,
32 percent in the case of Haiti, 29 percent in Jamaica and 17 percent for Barbados
(Samuel 1996: Table 6). In Jamaica, remittances have been the fastest growing source of
foreign exchange inflows in the 1990s. Hence, the Caribbean Diaspora is undoubtedly an
important source of household income in many of these societies as well as a major
aspect of people- based integration within the social life of the region itself.
To summarise, the insular Caribbean has a small number of densely populated states
whose living conditions are not too dissimilar from those in the rest of the Greater
Caribbean, and a large number of mini- states and dependent territories, some of which
have been able to secure relatively high incomes by specialising in tourism and financial
10
services. It is likely that income differentials within the sub- region have widened in the
past two decades, intra- regionally if not intra- nationally. Pressures arising out of shifts in
the world economy and other developments generally referred to a globalisation are
evident in the difficulties experienced in the most populous countries during the 1990s,
and the uncertainties now faced by some of the smaller states. Poverty is a major problem
in the
per largerincomes.
capita countriesEven
and in
theseveral of the
relatively smaller societies,
prosperous societiesnotwithstanding
— including thetheir hig her
dependent
territories —are highly vulnerable to events not of their own making and to forces outside
of their control. Caribbean people continue to move in search of survival and a better
life, as they always have. But for the sub- region, vulnerability, differentiation and
fragmentation continue to be major issues.
Regionalism in the insular and the Greater Caribbean

Regional integration, or at least co-operation, is frequently advanced as a strategy of
confronting the challenges of globalisation and the risks of marginalisation facing the
insular and the Greater Caribbean. In the 1990s there has been renewed interest in
regionalism as shown by the Report of the Independent West Indian Commission, the
expansion of Caricom, the formation of Cariforum and the creation of the Association of
Caribbean States. In the wider hemisphere there have been efforts to consolidate
Mercosur, the Andean Community, and the Central American Int egration System in
response to the formation of Nafta and the drive towards the EU Single Market.
Regional integration cannot substitute for what is lacking at the national level. Essential
foundations of effective regionalism are internal political and social cohesiveness and
policy coherence. Several societies in the insular Caribbean are facing severe problems of
governance and political legitimacy including Haiti, Guyana, Suriname, Jamaica, and
possibly Trinidad and Tobago. These are rooted in ethnic and class conflict and in some
instances in the fragility and erosion of national institutions. These problems will make it
difficult to embark on regional projects that require negotiated compromises, concessions
on national sovereignty and consistent implementation. In the Greater Caribbean the
movement towards effective regionalism will also be conditioned by success in resolving
problems of internal legitimacy in several of the G3 and Central American states.
Caricom is often referred to as one of the more successful integration groups in the
developing world. But the Community has disappointed many who saw in it the
possibility of organising a cohesive economic grouping with harmonised and coordinated
economic policies. Initiatives that failed to be completed include the harmonisation of
fiscal incentives, the regional industrial policy, joint strategies of agricultural
development, and the organisation of joint industrial enterprises. By the early 1990s
Caricom had opted for the newly fashionable strategy of “open regionalism”. The
Common External Tariff was reduced steeply and the process of forging a Caricom
Single Market and Economy was launched. Progress towards the CSME has been steady,
but agonisingly slow; and the target date for completion has been put back several times.
Caricom co- operation has been more successful in the field of external negotiations
focussing on relations with the EU under Lome and with the US under the FTAA.
Caricom’s governments continue to be driven by the immediate requirements of
11
preserving and enhancing existing external trade privileges; the organisation is not seen
primarily as a co- operation mechanism to assist the transformation of internal social and
economic relations.
A significant development in 1997 was the bid by the new Fernandez Administration in
the Dominican
in the forging ofRepublic to become
a “strategic a bridge
alliance” between
between thesub
the two Caribbean
- regionsand Central
(Girvan America
1998). The
proposal is for a Free Trade Agreement between the two sub- regions and between both
and the Dominican Republic, with co- operation in business enterprise development, in
tourism and investment promotion, and in external trade negotiations. Initial response has
been lukewarm, as both sub-regions see little scope for the expansion of intra- regional
trade and are preoccupied with the more immediate issues of Nafta parity and the EU
post- Lome negotiations. Yet as the small countries of the insular Caribbean and the
Isthmus discover the limits of their leverage in the post Cold War era, interest in a
strategic alliance of this kind is likely to grow.
The emergence of the ACS as an inter - governmental organisation of the Greater

Caribbean, may also be significant (Byron 1998). The ACS aims to foster co -oper ation in
trade, transport and tourism. The principal ACS members already belong to integration
groups: Mexico with NAFTA, Colombia and Venezuela with the Andean Group, and
Central America and the Anglophone states to SICA and Caricom respectively. An ACS
Free Trade Area is therefore unlikely, as is joint external negotiations on trade
agreements. But the very existence of the ACS, whose headquarters are in Port - of -Spain,
is stimulating interest in educational exchange, language training, trade facilitation, and
sustainable tourism.
Another notable development is the growing role of non - governmental organisations in

effecting regionalism at the level of civil society. In the insular Caribbean there is the
Caribbean Policy Development Centre and in Central America there are several including
the Civil Initiative for Central American Integration (Serbin 1998). In recent years there
have been two meetings of the Permanent Forum of Greater Caribbean Civil Society,
which is promoted by CRIES. The emergence of these new actors is part of a wider
hemispheric and global phenomenon in the 1980s and 1990s. It corresponds to the growth
of the women’s and environmental movements and of community organisations, as well
as to the erosion of the state and the decline of conventional left parties due to shrinking
labour union membership and the fall of the USSR. By being less bureaucratic and more
flexible, visionary and voluntaristic than the existing official structures, these movements
may be better placed to promote integration processes at the popular level.
Towards the future

At the close of the 19 th century the Caribbean had not yet been invented. The nation -state
was very much a privilege of the imperial powers. The British, French and Dutch West
Indies were sleepy backwaters of European empires. Haiti and the Dominican Republic
were relatively isolated. Marti had died fighting for a free Cuba and Nuestra America , but
Cuba and Puerto Rico were in the process of exchanging one imperial overlord for
another. Few could have guessed at the momentous changes the 20 th century would bring.
12
Yet these changes were already in the making. The European powers were enmeshed in a
deadly imperialist rivalry that would lead not to two World Wars that were to change the
politic al map of the world and set the stage of decolonisation. In Jamaica, Garvey had
already started to question the racially stratified order of the colonial society, the first step
towards his vision

slavery racial of a unitedAll
discrimination. Africa as home
over the Britishfor black
West people
Indies, theliberated from mental
second generation of
free blacks had secured education and were now manning the teaching profession, which
gave birth to the Trinidadian CLR James and others who were to launch the labour and
independence movements of the 1930s. In Cuba, Marti’s dream refused to die; 60 years
later it would inspire Fidel Castro and the Cuban Revolution. The social foundations for a
Sandino, a Manley I and II, a Williams, a Jagan and a Bishop had alr eady been
established.
The foundations of the changes of the early 21 st century have already been laid, even if
the changes themselves cannot be predicted. Capitalist globalisation and the ideology of
progress are being questioned, as was imperialism 100 years ago. But so are the legacies
of ideas and institutions of the political movements of the 20th century, such as national
sovereignty and its expressions of nation - state, national development, and regional (inter -
state) co- operation. Sovereignty and identity are being detached from a defined physical
space; while culture and common interest are emerging as important frames of reference.
To be sovereign in the age of global community will be less a matter of formal state
authority and more a matter of developing the capacity for autonomous and proactive
strategies at all levels, beginning with the community. To be regional will imply
discovering shared identity and interests and acting in function of those.
If the Caribbean was an invention of the 20th century, it seems certain to be re- interpreted
and perhaps transcended in the 21st. The Caribbean of tomorrow will not be an
exclusively Anglophone or Hispanic conception; and it will not be tied exclusively to
geographic space or definition. If it survives at all, it will be a community of shared
economic, social and political interests and strategies that encompasses different
languages and cultures and the Caribbean Diaspora. It might well include inter -state co-
operation, but if so this will be only one of a number of spheres of interaction.
It is by no means clear to this writer that all or most of these societies will survive as
viable entities; units which provide for the basic social, economic and community needs
of a collection of defined citizens and with some capacity for autonomous action. Some
may become just places to reside in for a while, to visit, to holiday in, and to retire to. In
any case, only those legacies of the 20 th century that are found to be in the interests of the
people of the r egion will be retained and reshaped. The rest will be discarded and
forgotten, and our people will move on.
Mona, February 9, 1999
13
References: Reinterpreting the Caribbean
Beckford, George (1972)

Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in the Plantation Economies of the Third World .
New York: Oxford University Press

Best, Lloyd (1971)
“Independent Thought and Caribbean Freedom”, in Norman Girvan and Owen Jeffeerson
(eds.) Readings in the Political Economy of the Caribbean . Mona: New World Group
Ltd., 7- 26. (Originally published in New World Quarterly , Vol. 3, No. 4, 1967)
Bosch, Juan (1983)

De Cristobal Colon a Fidel Castro: El Caribe, Frontera Imperial. La Habana: Editorial
de Ciencias Sociales (1st Ed. 1970)
Byron, Jessica (1998)

“The Association of Caribbean States: Growing Pains of a New Regionlaism?”
Pensamiento Propio, No. 7; May- August; Year 3; 33- 57
Casimir, Jean (1991)

La Caraibe: Une et Divisible . Port au Prince:CEPALC Nations Unies –Editions Henri
Deschamps. (In Spanish as La Invencion del Ca ribe. San Juan; Editorial de la
Universidad de Puerto Rico, 1997.)
Castro Ruz, Fidel (1999)

Palabras Sobre el Caribe al Encuentro Internacional sobre Globalizacion y Problemas del
Desarrollo, La Habana, 20 January 1999. (Unofficial English Translation, Norman
Girvan)
Ceara Hatton, Miguel (1997)

“The Insular Caribbean and hemispheric integration”, Pensamiento Propio. Septiembre-
Diciembre 1997/Ano 2; no.
Clarke, Lawrence, ed. (1997)

Essays in Honour of William Demas . St Augustine, Trinidad: Caribbean Centre for
Monetary Studies.
CRIES (1997)
1er Foro de la Sociedad Civil del Gran Caribe . Managua: CRIES-INVESP.
Ferriol, Angela (1998)

“La Reforma Economica en Cuba en los 90”/”Economic Reform in Cuba in the 1990s”
Pensamiento Propio , No. 7; 5- 24
14
UNDP (1998)
Human Development Report, 1998 . New York and London: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Eric (1944)

Capitalism and Slavery . Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Williams, Eric (1970)

From Columbus to Castro: The History of the Caribbean, 1492 - 1969. London: Harper
and Row.
World Bank (1996)

Poverty Reduction and Human Resource Development in the Caribbean. Washington,
D.C. (May)
16
Annex Table 1. Basic Statistics on the Greater Caribbean

Population Area km2 Density GDP 1995 GDP 1995 Indep’dence Language
Thousand Pers/km2 per capita US$Mn.
Mexico 90,100 1,967,183 46 2,775 250,038 1810 Spanish
Venezuela 21,852 916,445 24 3,433 75,016 1811 Spanish
Colombia 35,900 1,141,748 31 2,120 76,112 1810 Spanish
G-3 147,852 4,025,376 37 2,713 401,166
Costa Rica 3,424 51,000 67 2,697 9,233 1821 Spanish
El Salvador 5,662 21,040 269 1,673 9,471 1821 Spanish
Guatemala 10,621 108,889 98 1,364 14,489 1821 Spanish
Honduras 5,654 112,080 50 696 3,937 1821 Spanish
Nicaragua 4,124 130,700 32 464 1,913 1821 Spanish
Panama 2,622 75,517 35 2,827 7,413 1903 Spanish
Isthmus 32,107 499,226 64 1,447 46,456
Cuba 10,964 114,525 96 1,113 12,200 1959 Spanish
Dominican Republic 7,250 48,308 150 1,663 12,055 1844 Spanish
Haiti 7,180 27,750 259 285 2,043 1804 French
Insular non-Caricom 25,394 190,583 133 1,036 26,298
Antigua & Barbuda 64 440 146 6,640 427 1981 English
Bahamas 279 13,864 20 12,258 3,420 1973 English
Barbados 264 431 613 7,120 1,883 1966 English
Belize 217 22,966 9 2,696 584 1981 English
Dominica 74 751 98 2,574 190 1978 English
Grenada 98 344 285 2,344 230 1974 English
Guyana 780 216,000 4 809 631 1966 English
Jamaica 2,500 11,424 219 1,762 4,406 1962 English
St. Lucia 145 616 236 3,083 448 1979 English
St.Kitts & Nevis 42 269 156 4,642 195 1983 English
St.Vincent & Grenadines 110 389 283 2,032 224 1979 English
Suriname 409 163,820 2 1,066 436 1975 Dutch
Trinidad & Tobago 1,262 5,066 249 4,101 5,175 1962 English
Caricom 6,244 436,380 14 2,923 18,249
Aruba 82 188 434 16,810 1,370 Dutch
Netherland Antilles 207 783 265 7,871 1,632 Dutch
Dutch Territories 289 971 298 10,388 3,002
Anguilla 10 91 113 5,932 61 English
Montserrat 10 102 98 5,155 52 English
British Virgin Islands 18 150 122 18,487 339 English
Cayman Islands 32 260 123 28,125 900 English
Turks and Caicos Islands 15 417 35 7,021 103 English
British Territories 85 1,020 83 17,106 1,454
French Guiana (1) 141 91,000 2 9,908 1,397 French
Guadeloupe (1) 447 1,705 262 7,585 3,390 French
Martinique (1) 360 1,060 340 10,895 3,922 French
French Departments 948 93,765 10 9,187 8,709
Puerto Rico 3,700 9,065 408 11,450 42,364 Spanish
U.S. Virgin Islands 102 342 298 13,163 1,340 English
USA Territories 3,802 9,407 404 11,495 43,704
Insular Caribbean (2) 36,762 732,126 50 2,759 101,416
Greater Caribbean 216,721 5,256,728 41 2,533 549,038
(1) 1992 GDP data (2) Caricom members, Cuba, the DR, Haiti, and the dependent territorie
Source : based on data in Ceara 1997, Annex Table 1
17

Dokumen - Tips Reinterpreting The Caribbean 2001 by Norman Girvan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dokumen - Tips Reinterpreting The Caribbean 2001 by Norman Girvan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dokumen - Tips Reinterpreting The Caribbean 2001 by Norman Girvan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

8/11/2019 Reinterpreting the Caribbean 2001 by Norman Girvan

Reinterpreting the Caribbean

- Norman Girvan –

Forthcoming, UWI Press, 2001

This is reflected at the level of regional organisations. Caricom is primarily an

Table 1. Many Caribbeans

An analogous ambivalence is evident among the no n - Hispanics. Up to the middle of the

In analysing socio- economic characteristics, we have found it useful to distinguish four

(i) Larger Island States:

Chart 1. The Caribbean: language

Larger island states

Table 3. Insular Caribbean: GDP, Population and Land Area

Table 4. Insular Caribbean: Human Development, Growth and Poverty

Smaller island states

The Caribbean Diaspora

Regionalism in the insular and the Greater Caribbean

The emergence of the ACS as an inter - governmental organisation of the Greater

Another notable development is the growing role of non - governmental organisations in

Towards the future

towards his vision

Mona, February 9, 1999

References: Reinterpreting the Caribbean

Beckford, George (1972)

New York: Oxford University Press

Bosch, Juan (1983)

Byron, Jessica (1998)

Casimir, Jean (1991)

Castro Ruz, Fidel (1999)

Ceara Hatton, Miguel (1997)

Clarke, Lawrence, ed. (1997)

Ferriol, Angela (1998)

Williams, Eric (1944)

Williams, Eric (1970)

World Bank (1996)

Annex Table 1. Basic Statistics on the Greater Caribbean

You might also like