Alan Watt Compendium 2010
Alan Watt Compendium 2010
Alan Watt Compendium 2010
UN Foundation-Private "Charitable" Organization Set up with 1 Billion Bucks from Ted Turner
--Leadership List
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March 2 nd 2010. For
newcomers, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.comweb site and bookmark all the
other sites I have listed there because once in a while the big ones go down and for some
reason as I’m uploading I can’t upload any more until they increase the bandwidth, even though
it’s supposed to be automatic. So if you have these other sites listed you can always download
the latest shows without a problem. [Official sites listed above.] I always mention that this is
the tin can moment where I rattle the tin can. It never rattles much because there’s not much
in it. So it’s up to you to keep me going. The ads on this show pay for the air time. I have
nothing to do with the advertisers at all. They pay RBN directly for the air time; it’s pays for
their staff, equipment and transmission of the program. It pays their bills as well. So it’s up to
you to keep ME going and support me by buying the things I have for sale
at cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site or donating to me. Go into the sites and you’ll find
out how to do it. [Ordering and donation option listed above.] For those who get the disks
burned and passed to them, who don’t like using computers and they play them on their CD
players, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. And that’s that part done.
I’m sure the audience out there is pretty well educated in what’s going on in the world today,
outside the general, little releases we get from the media and all the diversions too, supplied by
the same media. You know we’re going through a big transformation in society and the world
in general and a whole new way of living, a world where we’ll be living in communes. They talk
about communes and Super Cities and so on, they’re talking about, really, this new world order,
the age of AUSTERITY for the masses, which means POVERTY basically, although there will be
different levels of poverty as we all go down the tubes, until eventually those who think they
are middle class or higher will also go down the tubes with us, but they will be the last ones to
go. That really is the long-term agenda, a 50 year plan for this part of it, and in the meantime
they must take us down in a post-industrial, post-productive society. We’re all consumers
now. Even though we might work, we are passing things around that are imported from
elsewhere. That is a service economy. A service economy is likened to a dog being put into a
swimming pool and it can only swim for as long as its strength holds, then it drowns. That’s
where we’re going. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s interesting to see how the big
maps that were drawn up during World War II, where the world was to be divided up into
regions, have all really come to pass. The big bloc, like the Soviet bloc, has turned in to the EU
bloc basically, as they change hats from RED to BLUE basically. Suddenly we’re all going into
these big regional blocs. It’s the same with Pacific Rim Region and a whole bunch of countries
coming under the domain of China, the strongest country in that area. That was set up BY the
West. Modern China was definitely set up by the West to be the main manufacturer for the
whole planet AND the United Nations calls it the role model for the world. The Americas still
have to be totally integrated and they are working hard with Latin America. People, they know
darn well that the US has had troops going in and out of various Latin American countries for
almost 40 years to not really stabilize it as much, but to keep it in a certain mode so they can
integrate them eventually when the time comes under the NAFTA Agreement. Main trading
blocs were what was discussed during World War II.
It’s interesting that Karl Marx also talked about these blocs and they would all be under the
dominion of a world government. Well, that’s all we are going through. I say all, it means
everything but that’s all we are really going through as we are deceived and lied to by the
countries that signed on to it and that is your governments. Every government that signed the
agreement at California for the United Nations in 1946 basically sold their sovereignty right out
to the United Nations. The big foundations and big power brokers, the guys who funded Hitler
and funded the Soviet Union all through its empire days, are the guys who also set up the
United Nations. I mean, why think small, eh, when you want the whole darn planet? That’s
what they did. Everything was done by deception, whether it’s people supposedly voting to
join the EU and saying NO 10,000 times and then having it rammed down their throats anyway,
to the fact that they said when the elected a President, he’d be a kind of referee. He’d sit there
and referee between the different countries, which is all a joke as well because it’s now in the
papers that the President Van Rompuy, as they call him, is trying to take over and be the chief
chutzpah. This article here is from the Telegraph.
War in the EU as Herman Van Rompuy makes 'power grab'
Open warfare has broken out at the top of the European Union with governments accusing
the new president, Herman Van Rompuy, of making a power grab.
By Bruno Waterfield in Brussels / 26 Feb 2010
National leaders are concerned Mr Van Rompuy, who had been expected to take a back
seat role, is attempting to expand his position.
Germany and France backed his candidature on the understanding he would act as an EU
"chairman" rather than a high-profile leader. (Alan: Silly them.)
But the introduction of the Lisbon Treaty has triggered bitter in-fighting between Mr Van
Rompuy, Baroness Ashton, the foreign minister, and the Commission over who is in
charge of representing Europe on the global stage. (A: I said, our only chance, really, for
the people of the world, is when they start to see this world power coming into play and
there is only one throne for Europe and one for this and one for the United Nations,
eventually. THAT’S WHEN THE BIG PSYCHOPATHS START TO FIGHT WITH EACH
OTHER. They can’t stand another psychopath winning, you see. They’re all very
competitive people. They’ve got to be KING and this is really what this is all about, to be
honest with you.)
Diplomats are increasingly worried that amid the turf wars there is a danger of Brussels
"mission creep" as squabbling EU chiefs try to enlarge their empires at the expense of each
other and national sovereignty.
National governments, led by Germany, are incensed by an attempt by Mr Van Rompuy to
take on new powers he claims were agreed at an informal summit two weeks ago.
There has been particular anger over a letter he sent to EU leaders following the chaotic
Feb 11 meeting in Brussels that was dominated by the economic crisis in Greece and talk
of a European bail-out.
Despite the fact that the meeting only lasted three hours, with Greece the main topic of
discussion, Mr Van Rompuy insisted that eight to ten specific points were agreed, a view
that has been disputed by most EU leaders.
One of the points of the classified letter, seen by The Daily Telegraph, gives Mr Van
Rompuy the right to lead the EU's negotiating team at G20 summits,usurping the role of
national governments and the Commission. (A: Isn’t that something? But again, there
is nothing that surprises me at all when you really understand these characters that get
picked to go to the top and they ARE picked to go to the top, not by the public either.
Nobody had heard of this character before he was shoved in front of everyone’s face. But
he was obviously the man who the bigger powers had selected to do the job and be the
man. So he’s got bosses like they all do. Everything is done by deception but it’s no
different from the political farces we go through.)
You know, if you want to control a country, you don’t control it by politicians; they come and
go. You control it by the SELECTING THE BUREAUCRATS and making sure that each bureaucracy
has its particular ONGOING mandate. They can work for 50, 60 years on one mandate in one
division of a government and they are not responsible to the public. The public generally
doesn’t even know that such divisions exist on specific, individual divisions of government. For
instance, here’s an example. At the end of World War II, part of the Lend-Lease Agreement,
that was basically bailouts for all those European countries FROM America, one of the
stipulations the US put on that was Europe would integrate. It was far, far more than just
economic free trade; it was literally integration. That was the mandate and that’s been
reiterated through every NATO document ever since. It was for total integration, but they
always lie to the public and call it free trade, etc.
They set up bureaucracies. During the whole time from 1946 onwards – 1948 was the official
date that they had in their own papers for these organizations within bureaucracies working
full-time on it – all that time, right up until the 1990s THEY DENIED THAT THEY EVEN EXISTED,
these departments for total integration. The only ones they presented to the public were the
bureaucracies dealing with the trade aspects of it only, BUT NOT TOTAL POLITICAL INTEGRATION.
So BUREAUCRATS AND BUREAUCRACIES ARE MORE IMPORTANT, REALLY, THAN THE
POLITICIANS. Politicians are there to take the mud slinging and catch the tomatoes and the
eggs and fill their pockets and do what they are told and go on their merry way afterwards, on
the boards of directors and getting payoffs. That’s what they are there for. REALLY, that’s what
they are really there for.
You cannot put people who are just basic lawyers or basic whatever into jobs and suddenly they
are the head of the environmental department or the judiciary department or something else
when they’ve had no experience before. That’s still run by the bureaucrats and that’s why
every politician is appointed OVER a department, is also appointed a particular bureaucrat
FROM that department that TELLS them what to do… tells them what to do. That’s how it’s
really run… so GOVERNMENT IS A SHOW. That’s also why the United Nations mandate has
never faltered and never altered its course since it was set up and always gets what it wants
with its 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 year plans for different parts of it.
Here’s a CNN poll.
CNN Poll: Majority says government a threat to citizens' rights
(A: No kidding. I’m glad they’ve noticed something.)
Posted: February 26th, 2010 / From CNN Deputy Political Director Paul Steinhauser
Washington (CNN) – A majority of Americans think the federal government poses a threat
to rights of Americans, according to a new national poll.
Fifty-six percent of people questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey
released Friday say they think the federal government's become so large and powerful that
it poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens. Forty-four
percent of those polled disagree.
The survey indicates a partisan divide on the question: only 37 percent of Democrats, 63
percent of Independents and nearly 7 in 10 Republicans say the federal government poses a
threat to the rights of Americans.
According to CNN poll numbers released Sunday, Americans overwhelmingly think that
the U.S. government is broken - though the public overwhelmingly holds out hope that
what's broken can be fixed. (A: I’ve often used the analogy that it’s like a Tower of
Babel. It’s rotten from the foundations and it’s held together in its crooked way with so
much bandages and scotch tape and all the rest of it that you can’t fix something that’s
crooked from its foundation. It’s faulty from the very foundation, very basic.)
The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted February 12-15, with 1,023
adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3
percentage points for the overall survey. (A: It says here.)
There was an article which kind of shows you where we’ve gone as society too. It’s from a
Sunday feature from the BBC. I don’t know if it was showed last weekend or what because I
don’t have the exact date on it here.
From Gameboy to Armageddon
Last broadcast on Sun, 21 Feb 2010, 21:30 on BBC Radio 3.
War games are as old as military history but something has begun to change as war and
play converge to create what some call the 'military entertainment complex'. (A: Good
term isn’t it… but it’s always been that way.) Ken Hollings pushes the button on this
latest phenomenon.
Men have always played at and with soldiers. Gaming has been an essential part of
warfare and by the 19th Century it had been developed into the sophisticated "Kriegspiel",
derived from the still influential theories of Von Clausewitz and played at military colleges
in both Europe and America. These war games then became real games for table-top
strategists by the early 20th Century. (A: I’ll come back to this article after the following
break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article, “From Gameboy to
Armageddon,” and it’s talking about war games and how Hollywood is totally integrated with
the military-industrial complex. It really has always been that way. They used Hollywood for
World War II. They churned out HUNDREDS of these awful movies where every G.I. was called
Joe for some reason. Literally, HI JOE, I’M HIT, OH, I’LL GET OVER THERE JOE, ALRIGHT. Everybody was
Joe. Of course the bad guys could never shoot straight in these propaganda wars, just to make
the guys going into it thinking they were pretty safe. But it says here…
A remarkable synergy developed between colleges of war and devisers of such games,
particularly in America. And in the think tanks of the RAND Corp gaming theory was used
intensively to plot the future of war and nuclear destruction.
But from the late 1970s computer strategy games started to form a powerful loop between
gamers and warriors. With the creation of the SIMNET, the military began to develop
hugely powerful simulators and now convergence is taking place between military and
the entertainment industry. Some say we are living in what Stanford Professor Tim
Lenoir has called 'the military entertainment complex', with military functions increasingly
taking place online, using simulation for training and in the treatment of soldiers suffering
from post traumatic stress disorder. But is this new realm of war truly a revolution - the
shape of things to come - or just more virtual bangs for real bucks?
Well, it’s more than that because war games and simulation were used even during World War
II. I think they first used them for the gunners on heavy bombers. That was the first real sort of
gaming idea where the planes would come in; it was all virtual reality, only it was done with
screens and film and now they’re using computers. The whole idea was to make
people DESENSITIZED TO KILLING PEOPLE. Normal folk don’t normally kill people. They had to
find ways of desensitizing you so you kill automatically in a Pavlovian reflex basically. That’s
why they invented the video games in the first place, by the military complex. Then they first
used them with the military, now they are into society. They have been for 20-odd years and
for a good reason. It’s because they wanted THAT generation to grow up and go INTO the
military to finish off this part of the new world order and they’ve been very, very successful at
it, in fact.
Here’s another thing that ties in with this. I’ve got laugh at the media when then come out with
these ridiculous articles. This is from The Check Up, Washington Post.
Study links violent video games to violent thought, action
(A: Well gee, who’d have thunk, eh? Who’d have thunk?
Like they just found this out… my you-know-what.)
WashingtonPost.com
A study in the March issue of Psychological Bulletin, a journal of the American
Psychological Association, shows that playing violent video games increases violent
thinking, attitudes and behaviors among players. And it does nothing to promote
positive social behaviors. (A: Well, my goodness. It’s just astonishing isn’t it? It takes a
scientist to… thank goodness they are there to tell us this stuff because we have no
common sense; we can’t see it for ourselves, obviously.)
Psychologist Craig Anderson of Iowa State University and his team analyzed existing
studies of 130,000 people from the U.S., Europe and Japan. His findings held for players in
Western and Eastern cultures, for male and female players and for players of various ages.
They also contradict some earlier studies, whose findings the current authors say are
tainted by "selection bias" -- the method by which they selected studies to analyze.
The new study notes that while violence in movies and TV shows has long been examined
for its potential impact on viewers' proclivity for violence, video gaming, a much newer
phenomenon, has not yet been so fully explored. (A: That’s nonsense because we are
guided through what they call entertainment of all kinds, as to how we act and behave.
When little Johnny has been playing on these video games and he’s sitting on the floor
with his mouth open, totally enraptured as he’s killing off whatever he’s killing off,
because that’s what it’s all about, and mommy says to him, JOHNNY COME AND HAVE YOUR
DINNER and he has a temper tantrum or really has an outburst, it’s because HE’S IN A
BATTLE, you see. He’s going from killing and fighting for his life into obeying mom. It
doesn’t quite mesh and this is well understood and always has been.)
In its review of data, the new research found that exposure to violent video games was
associated with aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition and aggressive "affect." It
desensitizes users and is associated with lack of empathy and a lack of "prosocial"
behavior.
In an accompanying commentary, Christopher Ferguson and John Kilburn of the
department of behavioral applied science and criminal justice at Texas A&M International
University note flaws in Anderson's analysis, including what they say is his own selection
bias. (A: Then they go on to bash another scientist as they bring out their new studies
with their new scientist and it’s an in-house kind of thing. Basically, they come up with
the same old stuff, which is kind of… IT MIGHT BE AND IT MIGHT NOT BE BAD FOR CAUSING
AGGRESSION and so on and so on. I can’t be bothered reading the rest of it because these
kind of articles bore me to tears. Common sense should prevail and it’s something we’ve
been taught not to have anymore… or ignore, I should say.)
Six months ago, perhaps or a bit longer, Prince Charles came out with a speech. Now, Prince
Charles and his daddy, [Alan speaking with an elitist accent] his fAAther, MY FAATHER AND I, and
his mum, MY MAATHER AND I… he came out and… They tried to find a job for him to do years
ago; they said he was a Prince without a cause or a purpose because mummy did all the work.
They put him in charge of the environment and architecture for cities, that kind of stuff. Here is
his latest thing and WE’VE ALL TO BECOME SLUM DWELLERS, for the good of the planet. I'll be
back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Prince Charles and how
we should really listen to him when they put him up there on the pedestal and he opens his
mouth and says something, because it’s really in line with the big agenda. He was the first one,
publicly, to be put in front of the media at least, to talk about the public/private partnership
deals that were to come along and that’s all we have now is public/private partnerships.
In this two-part video that someone sent me, it’s a documentary from, I think, the BBC. He
talked about how we can learn a lot from slum dwellers… for conservation and all that kind of
stuff. This was followed by the investigative journalist who went across to India to this place
that Charles had mentioned at Mumbai, which is a big up-and-coming city. It’s got the largest
slum city in the middle of it. It’s a shack town, a shanty town in the middle with, I think,1
MILLION PEOPLE PER SQUARE MILE… crammed together like you wouldn’t believe. He goes
over there, this reporter, and he sees the children defecating in the streets and all this kind of
stuff. They’re living amongst open sewage, running through the streets and stuff like that. This
is what Prince Charles advocates because, you see, there is very little crime there and the folk
get on so well, apparently, and their consumption level is awfully low and they don’t give off
much greenhouse gases because I guess they’re so darn poor. Anyway, it’s worth seeing. I’ll try
and track up a link to that if I can find it somewhere up on one of the servers out there to show
you. It’s a fantastic two-part documentary on Mumbai.
Here’s an article from the greenies, you see. As I say, you’ve got to listen to Prince Charles
when he makes a statement; it means this IS going to be part of the agenda. That’s what it
means when he says this. This is from ProspectMagazine.co.uk, a greenie magazine on the
same topic after Charles had his say, you see; press the button and they all fall into action.
How slums can save the planet
Prospect Magazine / Stewart Brand / 27th January 2010 — Issue 167
Sixty million people in the developing world are leaving the countryside every year. (A:
What he doesn’t mention here is that’s Agenda 21. We’re all to get off the countryside
and crammed into the big cites as we die off and we are more and more sterile every year,
up until the year 2050.)
The squatter cities that have emerged can teach us much about future urban living.
(A: So, squatter cities are to teach us, right.)
Dharavi, Mumbai, where population density reaches 1m people per square mile.
In 1983, architect Peter Calthorpe gave up on San Francisco, where he had tried and failed
to organise neighbourhood communities (A: Now, communities is commutarianism.
That’s what George Bush Sr first mentioned. That’s to be the new way, commutarianism,
a sort of blend of communist China and the Western values merged together, but more
towards the communist China side.), and moved to a houseboat in Sausalito, a town on the
San Francisco Bay. He ended up on South 40 Dock, where I also live, part of a community
of 400 houseboats and a place with the densest housing in California. Without trying, it
was an intense, proud community, in which no one locked their doors. Calthorpe looked
for the element of design magic that made it work, and concluded it was the dock itself and
the density. Everyone who lived in the houseboats on South 40 Dock passed each other on
foot daily, trundling to and from the parking lot on shore. All the residents knew each
other’s faces and voices and cats. (A: I guess they had no dogs there, which tells me
something. Anyway…) It was a community, Calthorpe decided, because it was walkable.
Building on that insight, Calthorpe became one of the founders of the new urbanism,
along with Andrés Duany, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk and others. (A: They will all have
funding from the big foundations, you’ll find, if you do a search, I’m sure.) In 1985 he
introduced the concept of walkability in “Redefining Cities,” an article in the Whole Earth
Review, an American counterculture magazine that focused on technology, community
building and the environment. Since then, new urbanism has become the dominant force in
city planning, promoting high density, mixed use, walkability, mass transit, eclectic design
and regionalism.(A: It’s the complete United Nations agenda here.) It drew one of its
main ideas from the houseboat community.
There are plenty more ideas to be discovered in the squatter cities of the developing world,
the conurbations made up of people who do not legally occupy the land they live on (A:
In Agenda 21 you’ll have no private property. The state literally will basically own
everything or they might have public/private with sort of chain-store type rental places
and skyscrapers owned by a handful of people.)—more commonly known as slums. One
billion people live in these cities and, according to the UN, this number will double in the
next 25 years. There are thousands of them and their mainly young populations test out
new ideas unfettered by law or tradition. (A: They don’t pay taxes either, by the
way.) Alleyways in squatter cities, for example, are a dense interplay of retail and
services (A: If I find that link for the one on India – and I’ll put it up on my web site at the
end of the show if I can find it – you’ll see what they’re talking about, how they all get
along, etc. I’m not kidding; there are just as many rats as people. You’ll see them all
over the place… and open sewage that they step over all the time. Their water pipes go
through this strange one-million complex place; the pipes literally are in the sewage
troughs. So when there is a leak in the pipes the sewage gets into your drinking water.
And by the way, they only turn the water on for 2 hours per day, for everyone.)—one-chair
barbershops and three-seat bars interspersed with the clothes racks and fruit tables. One
proposal is to use these as a model for shopping areas. “Allow the informal sector to take
over downtown areas after 6pm,” suggests Jaime Lerner, the former mayor of Curitiba,
Brazil. “That will inject life into the city.” (A: I’d say it would infect it into the city, but
that’s my opinion.)
The reversal of opinion about fast-growing cities, previously considered bad news, began
with The Challenge of Slums, a 2003 UN-Habitat report. The book’soptimism (A: …
ohh.) derived from its groundbreaking fieldwork: 37 case studies in slums worldwide.
Instead of just compiling numbers and filtering them through theory, researchers hung out
in the slums and talked to people. They came back with an unexpected observation: “Cities
are so much more successful in promoting new forms of income generation, and it is so
much cheaper to provide services in urban areas, that some experts have actually suggested
that the only realistic poverty reduction strategy is to get as many people as possible to
move to the city.” (A: It’s amazing how they come out with the United Nations agenda
isn’t it?)
The magic of squatter cities (A: …if you can stand the smell of sewage everywhere… and
watch where you put your feet…) is that they are improved steadily and gradually by their
residents. To a planner’s eye, these cities look chaotic. (A: [laughing] you’ve got to see
this two-part video, if you think it looks chaotic… The rats are looking for a clean bit to
sit on, you know, everything else is feces.) I trained as a biologist and to my eye, they look
organic.(A: Well, it’s certainly organic matter.) Squatter cities are also unexpectedly
green. They have maximum density—1m people per square mile in some areas of
Mumbai—and have minimum energy and material use. People get around by foot,
bicycle, rickshaw, or the universal shared taxi. (A: By the way, Mumbai also has its own
little mafia because even there is a class structure, in the shanty town. There is even a
millionaire living in the middle of it who has all these sweat shops throughout it. The little
boys that you’ll see in the video all work for him, and sleep in the shops as well because
they have nowhere else to go. Probably that will come out of their wages as well. But it’s
fantastic to watch the exploitation and how these characters, these prostitutes here, these
sellouts, under the guise of environmentalism that would never, ever sleep a night in a
place like that, are wanting to push this stuff on all of US. No kidding, eh? It’s just a
joke, such a joke. What a farce.)
That’s what they give us. How wonderful it is in the slum where you’re living with flattened tin
cans all stuck together for a wall and stuff like that, and you’ve got 20 folk in a room living. Just
a wonderful future they’re bringing in for us but, I tell you, it’s low consumption, it’s low carbon
output, you know. Dear, dear, the rubbish they peddle. Mind you, they say that perception
becomes reality and the more propaganda they give us, they could make us believe anything I
suppose. It reminds me of the old days too, in the Middle Ages where the Kings would have
their massive castles on top of the hill and the peasants all lived down below in mud shacks
with thatched roofs and straw on the floor to cover the mud. I guess that was good
sustainability, according to the elite that run the world today. Mind you, it’s a new feudal
system, as Carroll Quigley said, so it’s really the same OLD feudal system isn’t it?
Tuesday from the Telegraph. I’ve mentioned so many articles about what they do to your food
and what they make popular and whenever something has been made popular, AVOID IT LIKE
THE PLAGUE. Whether it’s bottled water that was made the massive fad, then you found out
that the bisphenol-A was in it and a whole bunch of other things that basically sterilized you,
which was there on purpose. They knew it all along. Here is another one, fruit juices, right.
Carcinogen antimony found in fruit juices
A chemical linked to cancer has been found in fruit juices and cordials drunk by millions
of people every day across Britain (A: And America too.), scientists have revealed.
By Daily Telegraph Reporter / 1 Mar 2010
Scientists have found levels of antimony, which can be lethal in large doses, in commercial
juices and cordials that exceed the EU limit for drinking water and raise concern about
leaching from packaging.
The University of Copenhagen found that bottles of fruit juice and squash contained up to
2.5 times more of the substance as is deemed 'safe' in tap water, under EU guidelines.
In some cases the levels of antimony were ten times higher.
Researchers studied antimony levels in various juices, mainly red fruit juices, packaged in
PET bottles, glass bottles and Tetra Pak cartons.
Studying antimony levels is of interest because of concern about the impact of increased
exposure on human health and the environment. (A: I guess the environment is first and
then human health is secondary.)
Of particular concern is antimony trioxide, a suspected carcinogen that is used in the
production of PET. (A: Then they looked at all these different drinks from 16 different
brands and they found that pretty well all had these high concentrations of this carcinogen
in it.)
Remember too, I think it was Dr Day that attended one of these big conferences – I don’t know
if it was related to the United Nations – back in the 60s or 70s, and it was discussed about ways
to kill the people, and it was said that WELL, IF YOU’RE GOING TO DIE OF ANYTHING AT ALL WHY
SHOULDN’T IT BE CANCER? And that was the idea, to step up the cancers. It was about the same
time, the 50s actually, where they came out with all the polio vaccines that contained the
simian virus 40 that’s only function is to cause cancers.
People will never, ever take that leap. They can climb the ladder, you know, but they can’t take
the last few steps. They have to cross the major steps to realize that they don’t just talk about
depopulation, they DO something about it. How, if you were in charge of the world, would you
do something about it? Would you ask for volunteers? Well, of course not. They simply went
ahead and did it folks… and that’s why everyone is dropping down, all age groups, with
cancers. That’s why too, Monsanto was given the complete go-ahead, not just go-ahead, they
CREATED Monsanto to PUSH all of these pesticides, these incredibly toxic pesticides which are
soaked up by the plant and it’s through all of its cellular structure AND they are ALL
carcinogenic. It’s a sad thing to say. I’m not being a fear monger; I’m just telling you the facts.
THAT’S what’s happening.
They KNOW what’s causing it, just like they know what’s causing sterility in the Western
world. THEY KNOW THESE THINGS. Do you understand, when cancers started to skyrocket,
just like autism and all the rest of these things with the inoculations and the food, it’s NEVER
BEEN DECLARED A CRISIS. When something takes off on a graph like a rocket going into outer
space, it surely should be a crisis and these ALL go off like rockets. But there’s no, OH NO. It’s
now the NEW NORMAL. It’s the new normal, you understand.
Depopulation by, it wasn’t just by preventing birth, it was also do with dying, increasing the
death rate. It was all part of the United Nations studies back in the 50s and even at the very
beginning of its set-up in fact, they had a Department of Population Control. I’ve read so many
articles over the years from the big boys books themselves who worked for the United Nations
like Julian Huxley when he talked about, for example, they’ve got to bring humanity off their
pedestal and bring down this idea that we are somehow more special than any other species.
In other words, dehumanize us, DEHUMANIZE LIFE ITSELF AND TRIVIALIZE LIFE ITSELF, in fact.
He also talked about stepping up the death rates and stepping up the abortion rates and so on.
Not because there was going to be too many people, you understand, it’s too many of the
WRONG people.
If you believe in evolution, you will believe that academia and all those who are running this
world right now, through all their think tanks and all the prostitutes that work for the big
foundations and live off your tax money, they actually believe they are more evolved than the
rest. The old man and woman who used to work in the factories are the old type; there’s no
use for them anymore. They are a step behind in evolution. Same ideas as the Marxist theory
that when they came into power, to kill off those who were not up to working in a capitalist
system. First you have to have a capitalist system and then you bring in Marxism during
industry. If the people don’t even need money, they are self-sufficient, you must kill off those
populations and that’s what they did with the Ukraine. That’s WHY they claim they did it. It
would take too long to bring them up through the various phases, or STAGES in this supposed
pseudo-science called Marxism, so they had to be killed off. The same thing is going on today.
Those who are left behind in this new system, the ones who would normally work in factories
and do a laboring or semi-skilled jobs, there is no use for them now. So they kill them off.
Beginning Debate on New Normal End of Life Routines for terminally ILL Children-for "New
Health Care System"
================
Last week I was going on about reality and showing you the differences between what you’re
told and what is actually happening and what IS… as I say, what IS, as opposed to the
propaganda. I’m sure most of you out there now in this audience are well aware that there are
different realities broadcast to the general public and different levels of classes… Back with
more after these messages.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Last week I mentioned about the IPCC
and how they have been caught with so many of their lies and that it doesn’t matter because
it’s a political agenda for a brave new world. We’ve all to be taught to parrot all the slogans
that they have. They call it ‘consensus building’ and all that kind of stuff. They have all these
organizations that are funded with trillions of bucks actually, and I mean TRILLIONS, all over the
world to bring in a common culture in a socialist system where we obey, do what we are told to
do and they bring down the populations by their nice Fabian socialist means, which means they
don’t tell you. After all, you wouldn’t get many volunteers, I think – not quite yet anyway – if
you asked for people to come forward and just walk into an extermination booth or to become
sterilized. But the way it’s going, if they can depress us enough I guess they will have a lot more
takers.
So they do it, what they call, ‘humanely’. It’s a ‘humane’ fashion. In other words, you don’t
know that you’re being injected with diseases, you’re being sterilized, and you’ll come down
with cancers and all the rest of it. You’ll just think it’s one of those things and it’s your tough
luck. The medical associations are taught that the new normal is that everybody gets cancer.
That’s how it’s all taken. Including the professions, they also get their propaganda with every
class that gets churned out there to practice on the people, in medical practice. That, really, is
how it’s done. Every LAYER is given its own propaganda. It’s so beautiful when you have
standardized, centralized education in the professions. You can give them, across the world,
updates and new theories at the same time and tell them, NO, THIS IS ALWAYS BEEN NORMAL;
EVERYONE DIES OF CANCER; THEY ALWAYS HAVE; INOCULATIONS ARE GOOD and all the rest of it.
Everyone takes their indoctrination and they go along with it too, even if what they’ve been
taught defies what they are seeing in practice. They eventually catch on to, WAIT A MINUTE, I
INJECTED ALL THESE CHILDREN LAST MONTH AND THEY HAVE ALL THESE PROBLEMS NOW WITH AUTISM AND THIS
AND THAT AND THE OTHER. Eventually you start to clue in there is something wrong. Then you
have a slight battle – I call it a slight battle – with your conscience. SHOULD I GO ALONG WITH THE
MEDICAL JOURNAL AND SAY EVERYTHING IS OKAY AND KEEP MY PAYCHECK OR DO I QUESTION? Well, if you
question you lose your license and you are out the door. That would be the right thing to do…
if you had any integrity at all. But these characters, of course, don’t have any. That’s why they
go into these jobs now, not because they want to really help people, it’s for the big bucks and
the status. That’s really the idea of it. It’s the same in academia too.
I mentioned it wouldn’t matter how many scandals broke out with the United Nations IPCC fake
propaganda arm for the climate change nonsense. If we were up to our eyes and our ears in
snow, they will still tell you it’s global warming. And they are doing that now. There is a whole
bunch. See, they’ve regrouped as they always do after one of these big organizations is found
out, especially the United Nations. They come out with just a mass of denials and lies and tell
you, once again, ALL THE SCIENTISTS ARE IN CONSENSUS WITH THIS. There is still massive consensus,
they say, for global warming over the long haul and that’s supposed to be good enough. You
see, everything is banked, under the big plan, the great world order plan, on us believing this
scam and stopping using so much fuel, stopping heating yourself by various means. In fact,
living in igloos would make them happier I think, and still tell you it’s global warming as you’re
living in them.
We’ve all to become very AUSTERE. When they say austerity is coming, they mean POVERTY.
It’s a nice way of saying POVERTY is coming to the bulk of the populace. Now, of course,
they’re crushing the old factory towns that are being torn down and the private homes that go
with it in the suburbs because of ‘urban sprawl’; it’s just too untidy. Then governments step in,
take over the land and flatten everything, sew grass and then they sell it all again to big
corporations. The corporations today want campus size organizations for themselves. That’s
happening all over the place. It has been, actually, for a long time.
What’s the fallout, as well, from those who are taking all this propaganda seriously? It’s scary
what’s really, really happening when we look at what’s happening. Here is an article for
instance, the Mail Online.
Baby girl survives after being shot in the chest in parents' 'global
warming suicide pact'
By Gerard Couzens / 1st March 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
A seven-month-old baby girl survived three days alone with a bullet in her chest beside the
bodies of her parents and toddler brother.
Argentines Francisco Lotero, 56, and Miriam Coletti, 23, shot their children before killing
themselves after making an apparent suicide pact over fears about global warming. (Alan:
In other words, they are taking everything literally and seeing this, and watching all the
sci-fi’s no doubt. They are just churning them out there, with a devastated planet and
barbarians roaming around and they believe it all. They cannot get it through their heads
that they are being lied to on a grand scale by all these nice people on television.)
Their son Francisco, two, died instantly after being hit in the back.
But their unnamed daughter cheated death after the bullet from her dad's handgun missed
her vital organs.
Paramedics rushed her to hospital covered in blood when police alerted by worried
neighbours discovered the massacre three days later.
The youngster is recovering in hospital in the town of Goya in the northern Argentine
province of Corrientes, where doctors say she is out of danger.
Her parents said they feared the effects of global warming in a suicide note discovered by
police.
So that’s probably one of many and that’s leaked out because it came from another country
probably. That’s the sort of thing that’s happening all over the place. Remember, the oldest
trick in the book is to terrify the public of a threat and then step in to save them all but in the
process it’s going to COST you to be saved. Adolf Hitler did it. Everyone has done the same sort
of tactic, all the totalitarian systems. And for those that don’t really get it, YOU ARE UNDER A
TOTALITARIAN SYSTEM AND YOU HAVE BEEN FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW. It SHOULD be
obvious to all of you. It should really be obvious to all of you. I really hope that it is. But that’s
the sort of thing that fear drives people to when they really believe what they are being told.
THE FUTURE IS HOPELESS, MY GOD, WE’RE AMONGST THE BOTTOM LEVEL IN POVERTY SO WHAT CHANCE DO WE
HAVE, ya-da, ya-da, ya-da, ya. You see.
For those who still think they are free… and how bad it’s getting now with the police state,
there is not a movie out there that doesn’t have these guys with the black combat gear on and
the masks. I don’t know if you noticed, these helmets they wear are actually the old German
helmets only they are made of polymer. I hope you know that. There was an article, about 12-
13 years ago when one of the big wigs in the US, one of the guys that was on the mainstream
news and was looked up to, had a little bit at the end – I think it was at the end of 60 Minutes –
and they showed you this helmet at the end and he says, DO YOU REALIZE THAT THE US GOVERNMENT
HAS LOOKED AROUND FOR THE BEST HELMET TO GIVE THE MOST PROTECTION TO THE HEAD AND AFTER SPENDING
SO MANY MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON DIFFERENT TYPES, THEY SAID THEY CAME UP
WITH THIS. Then they showed you the German one. He says, THAT’S WHAT THEY MODELED IT ON; THEY
COULDN’T IMPROVE ON IT. So it’s quite interesting to note that that’s what they’re really wearing,
German Nazi helmets… and the black outfits.
Black signifies DEATH. The old blue uniforms of the cops, when they called them The Thin Blue
Line, meant that it’s more above board; justice at least had to be SEEN, at least the appearance
of it had to be seen to be done and they would come and go with the general public. Now, the
black is for authoritarian only. That’s the hangman. That’s the guy who chops off the head. It
means OBEY. It’s meant to make you fearful and it’s working very well. We are living in fear
now. Everyone is fearful and if you get fearful, you turn to the government. I always tell you
that those who are abused always turn to the abuser for help and that’s exactly the technique
that is being used. Quite something. This article here, the Atlanta Journal, it says…
Woman, 61, arrested for asking ‘why'
By Rhonda Cook / The Atlanta Journal-Constitution –ajc.com / Thursday, February 18, 2010
Four women, two of them well into middle age, were discussing funeral plans for a friend
when an Atlanta police officer told them to move.
Three did but one asked “why.” In answer to her question, Minnie Carey, then 61, was
handcuffed, put into a police wagon and taken to jail, where she was held for nine hours.
The Citizen Review Board found that Atlanta Police officer Brandy Dolson had violated
APD policies and had falsely arrested Carey. (A: I don’t know if you know, these young
cops, they live on all the violent movies that are out there. They are IN to these movies
where SWAT teams are storming places and so on and it’s a police state. Really, they act
it out in real life. We’re all being trained by this, by the way. They are being trained to
be more violent and they act just the way they see the characters on TV act, like Rambo’s.
We are being taught to be more fearful and just obey.)
“I was blown away,” Carey told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “I had heard about
people in the community being harassed by the police … It really didn’t shock me as much
as it probably would have if I had not heard of people going to jail for no reason. I figured
I was just another one.
“But I had the right to ask ‘why' I had to move,” she said. (A: Well, she though she did.
Maybe that was in the old days.)
The Citizen Review Board – resurrected after the 2006 fatal police shooting of 92-year-old
Kathryn Johnston in her home (A: Another dangerous person, this 92 year old woman.
They just shot her.) – voted in a recent meeting to sustain Carey’s false arrest claim and the
allegation that the officer had violated the department’s arrest policies.
“This case will illustrate to the public how OPS [Office of Professional Standards]
responds [to allegations of police misconduct] … There have been some concerns that OPS
has not sustained complaints,” said Seth Kirschenbaum, an attorney who is vice-chairman
of the board. (A: They investigate themselves. This is their token to the public to show
you they are not always so bad and that their judgments can fall, once in a blue moon, on
the side of the civilian, as we’re called. Now we’re called ‘civilians’, you see. Quite
something, how the world has changed and they still say we’re free. I’ll be back with
more after these messages.)
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I was going to put a link up and do a
story too about a woman, who has political people backing her obviously, who is having her
own abortion done with one of the pills, RU-486 or whatever. She’s doing it all on Facebook
and Twitter as it happens and it’s pretty gruesome, I guess. I haven’t looked into it because I’m
not inclined to fall for the tricks that they put out in front of us. As I say, I won’t put that link up
but I just wanted to mention how degraded we are becoming and how it’s being pushed from
the TOP DOWN. This woman’s particular site is anti-theists. That in itself tells you she’s got
thing about religion and the value of life and stuff like that. She says, apparently, that IT’S NO BIG
DEAL, REALLY; IT WASN’T HUMAN ANYWAY. Well, if your own child is not human and you were one of
these babies in the womb, what are you? What are you? Hmm? But this is to get publicity and
to further get other folk and to encourage them to go along with that. You know, people will
do that kind of stuff. There are always certain people in the community that will catch
on, WOW, I’LL DO THAT TOO AND I’LL GET MY NAME OUT THERE and blah, blah, blah and they do crazy
things. There are a lot of idiots out there but that’s what the big people rely upon are the
idiots.
This gets me back to what I’ve mentioned many times. Julian Huxley, who was the first CEO of
UNESCO, the wonderful United Nations educational society etc, to bring in a standardized,
socialist world where we are all obeyed, just like lovely, happy Chinese people and work like a
COMMUNE basically. He said that WE MUST DEVALUE LIFE AND BRING IT DOWN FROM ITS PEDESTAL AS
SOMETHING SPECIAL, human life. They’ve been at that steadily for an awful long time until a lot of
people, of course, have taken the bait and they do devalue life. They truly believe all the
propaganda, OH, THERE’S TOO MANY PEOPLE, but they never stop to look at the immigration quotas
and ask, why are governments doing this if you are so overcrowded and there is no work out
there. Why would you be bringing in more and more and more? Well, that’s the agenda, TO
MAKE IT APPEAR OVERCROWDED because the big cities now, the Super Cities are to be the only
places on earth where the bulk of the ordinary folk are supposed to live, until we all die off, up
to the year 2050 or so. That’s the agenda right now.
This stuff is getting pushed from different areas too. It’s from the Daily Record in Scotland.
Nurses bequeath skeletons to tourist attraction (A: A tourist attraction!)
to highlight shortage of bodies for trainee doctors
Feb 26 2010 / dailyrecord.co.uk
(A: To be honest with you, there are so many people that die in the hospital and autopsies
are done pretty well on all the elderly that go through there, I don’t understand why there
is a shortage, for a start. It’s actually LAW over there in Scotland that anyone who dies at
home has to have an autopsy regardless, to satisfy the cops that there is no foul play,
supposedly. That’s the excuse for it. Personally, I think it’s another money-making
racket. They know darn well what the elderly have been dying of; they’ve been on
umpteen pills for years for the same problems.)
TWO NHS nurses have bequeathed their skeletons to a dungeon visitor attraction to
highlight the shortage of bodies donated to medical science, they said today. (A: I wonder
if they will plasticize them as well, and hang up their loose flesh somewhere. Anyway…)
Once they die, the bodies of Andrew and Janine Leishman will go to Edinburgh
University's medical college, which will pass the skeletons to Edinburgh Dungeon when it
has finished with them.
There, they will go on show as exhibits in the macabre attraction.
The couple, who both work at Bo'ness Hospital near Falkirk, said they agreed to the plan to
help draw attention to the decline in the number of bodies donated for research and
science.
Mrs Leishman, 45, said: "Being nurses we are both very much aware of the problem and
we also wanted to do this to highlight the desperate shortage of organ donors. (A: You
should just ask China. They will send you as much as you want, their prisons are full.)
"We're also big fans of the dungeon and the idea of joining their exhibits after death quite
appeals to us." (A: I wonder what they do for fun, these people.)
Mr Leishman said their 18-year-old son and 16-year-old daughter think their parents are
"weird" but have accepted the plan.
He and his wife, from Bo'ness, want to make a contribution after their death.
He said: "We've been to so many funerals and we find them to be soul-destroying affairs
which we don't want to inflict on our families.
In other words, let’s all make it a big fun thing, when we die. Death is fun, didn’t you know
that? Death is really fun. There is no dignity there at all, it’s all just FUN, you know, when you
croak your last and all the rest of it, so we should have a big party about it and just strip them
and put their skeletons up, or, put the whole lot up and plasticize it and hang them on wires,
like those ridiculous Frankenstein touring shows that are attracting a lot of weirdoes. That’s the
only people who go and see it. So that’s what’s happening in the world.
This is also what’s getting pushed in mainline media. And these idiots here, as well, are also
going to pay for the flesh to be stripped after it’s been autopsied and they’ve taken out what
they want. They have to pay to get it stripped, the skeleton cleaned and then all the rest of it.
So I guess they’ve got money to burn, literally. But that’s the kind of world we are living in
today as we are dehumanized, dehumanized, and dehumanized.
I wish people would truly study the history of socialism and the theories and the beliefs that are
pushed and rammed along with socialism. It’s to be a totally controlled society by those who
are fittest to rule them, generally academia, politicians and bureaucrats. Back with more after
this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about socialism and its policies
and its mandates and all the rest of it. You have to go into the histories of it to do with
depopulation. Depopulation was always first on their agenda. They always said, LOOK AT ALL THE
POOR PEOPLE, LOOK AT THE POOR PEOPLE. Because of that they got all the working people behind
them not realizing that one of their solutions, eventually, when they would rise and take over
power would be to ELIMINATE the poor, then you couldn’t say there were too many poor
people and too many unemployed. That literally is their agenda. That’s what you see on The
Soviet Story when you hear one of the founders of the British Fabian Society talk about it. He
says, YOU’LL HAVE TO COME TO US AND SAY WHY WE SHOULD ALLOW YOU TO LIVE . In other words, what
good are you to our system? You have to be of SERVICE in this new brave new world. SERVICE,
SERVICE, SERVICE… that’s why they brought us into service economies and eventually we’ll
simply be in service all together.
Part of it too, was to remove parents and children and bring up children separate. In fact, they
actually wanted initially to remove the children completely at birth from all parents. That’s
what Lord Bertrand Russell initially advocated until he tried his experimental schools to see if
they could scientifically indoctrinate children from Kindergarten onwards. He found it’s much
more economically feasible to do it this way. Let the parents pay for them but the state will
have their minds. That has happened. That’s why you still have your children, but they still go
ahead and take a lot of children away from their parents. This is from The Times.
Children taken from parents and adopted ‘to meet ministry targets’
(A: That’s the government targets.)
From The Times August 24, 2007 / Frances Gibb, Legal Editor
Record numbers of young children are being taken from their parents and adopted -
sometimes unjustly - to meet government targets, it is claimed today.
Each year some 1,300 babies under a month old are placed in care before adoption,
compared with 500 when the Government came to power, BBC Radio 4’s Face the Facts
claims today. (A: Remember that Labour, or Fabianism, that’s what they are by the way,
because both these Prime Ministers belong to the International Socialist… Socialist
Internationale, they call it. They – Brown and Blair – also are members of The Fabian
Society. If you look up the Fabian Society’s membership you will see their names on it.
So here they are going along with their targets because this is what they do; everything is
done to targets.)
The programme is told that there are now more than 100 cases of possible miscarriages of
justice in which children have been forcibly or unjustly adopted. (A: There is an awful lot
more than that.)
It says that the number of parents in England who have lost their children, despite
insufficient evidence that they were causing them harm, has reached record levels.
One reason, according to social workers, is that they are under pressure to
meet government adoption targets – in line with ministers’ (A: That’s the
politicians.) policy for more children in care to be adopted.
At the same time, it is claimed, parents are not always given a proper chance to challenge
adoptions because of the short time limit for appeals and the secrecyof the family
courts. (A: I hope you understand, it’s not a normal court. There is a justice of the peace
there, there’s the Children’s Aid advocates there and they are all pals, probably all go to
the same Eastern Star Lodge and all the rest of it and it’s a done deal.) Lawyers say that
hearings in private fuel parents’ sense of injustice and can in some cases breed bad
practice (A: The parents are not allowed in, when they’re all yapping together.),
preventing them from properly defending themselves. (A: …against whatever is being
said about them.)
Sarah Harman, a family law solicitor, said: “Secrecy breeds bad practice, it breeds
suspicion. It feeds parents’ sense of injustice when they have their children removed that
they’re not able to talk about it. They’re not able to air their grievances. Children have
been removed from their families unjustly. There’s no two ways about that.”
A social work manager with 25 years’ experience in child protection added that parents
had little chance of getting a hearing and overturning a decision made bythe
authorities. (A: Get used to that because that is what you will hear from now on. You
don’t even need names, just THE AUTHORITIES.)
The manager told the BBC: “People will find that their children have been removed and
freed for adoption without them having had a proper chance to defend themselves and their
families and their children.”
MPs (A: Members of Parliament, the politicians.) have also spoken out against the unfair
adoption system and are campaigning for a public inquiry. (A: Well, they’ll do that when
they’re in the office but they will carry on the same policies because I’ve never seen
anything change in Britain. There is just one agenda and it’s been going on for 100 years
or more and that’s how it really, really is.)
Before I take a caller, there is one article here and it’s called…
Unmade in the USA: Death of manufacturing in America
Chidanand Rajghatta, TOI Crest, Feb 27, 2010 / indiatimes.com
(A: You have to go to the Times of India to see it.)
Gary Larsen's eyes light up when he talks of the glory days of American manufacturing. A
retired Boeing worker in the Seattle area, Larsen is watching US industry go into coma
before his very eyes. His callused hands ferret out a floor shop manual from his working
days that he says would have been proprietary knowledge till a decade ago. "I'm not sure
anyone cares now," he shrugs, offering it for scrutiny of a bygone era. Another yellowing
in-house journal he fishes out has a picture of him on the cover. "We took great pride in
making things," Larsen sighs, "Today's kids can't make a thing." (A: And they can’t.
They can’t. They don’t know what making things happens to be.)
The fact that he still has the printed handbooks in the electronic age, years after he retired,
says something. Last week, Larsen drove into Seattle looking for motor parts for a small
boat he is building at home. He likes to stay connected — to reality; not in the online social
networking sense today's generation is familiar with. In fact, Larsen does not own a
cellphone and rarely goes on the computer. In his free time, he tinkers with his three
automobiles in his garage and makes assorted gee-gaws.
A few miles from his home, his old company Boeing still manufactures one of the rare few
things that come with a "Made in America" sticker — big airplanes . But even that prowess
is diminishing. More and more of the plane, including designing and manufacturing, are
being outsourced. After a severe downturn in the post-9 /11 years, and a brief upswing,
Boeing is in another nosedive, with its much-vaunted 787 way behind schedule. Last week,
the company announced 10,000 lay-offs, and there was barely a ripple anywhere.
Here are some numbers, something Americans are not very good at these days. In the year
2000, more than 17 million Americans were employed in manufacturing. By 2009, that
number had dropped to fewer than 12 million. (A: See, they had done the GATT Treaty.
Every government worked on bringing through the GATT Treaty for years and years and
years, just like they brought in the EU, in secrecy. They were setting up China to BE the
manufacturer for the whole planet… long before that and training them, by the way, in
Canada, Britain, the US and elsewhere for factories at that time they didn’t have in
China. They were all trained over here, all the engineers. The financing was all done
through the GATT Treaty from your countries, with your tax money, to transport all your
factories over to China. That’s how it was done. Your tax money transported them over.
You tax money paid them for 10 years for any loses they incurred until they were set up
and functioning and bringing in their proper profit. Under a treaty that most folk haven’t
even heard of because they were too busy watching sports and having fun.) The loss
ranged across industries, and few sectors reflected it more than automobiles, America's
pride and joy for decades. In 2000, more than 1.3 million Americans built automobiles. In
2009, fewer than 674,000 remained. Similarly, nearly 700,000 Americans were employed
making furniture. By 2009 that had dropped to 390,000. (A: Because they were making
them down south of the border in the Mexico corridor.) Clothes manufacturing jobs
dropped two thirds, from 483,500 to 168,300.
The first signs of the manufacturing demise appeared several years back when Levi
Strauss, virtually America's clothiers for more than a century, shifted its last jeans
manufacturing unit to Mexico (India is now a major jeans-maker ). (A: I watched a little
documentary on that and these characters are getting the jeans for 20-25 CENTS made
over there in China, and India is not far behind. Then they sell it to you over here for
whatever you – those that are silly enough to pay for them.) Around the same time, in a
move that sounded like a death rattle to Scrabble buffs, Hasbro, the company which made
the game famous, outsourced the manufacture of the tiles (made of soft Vermont maple) to
China and Malaysia. Today, American stores and supermarkets are filled with foreign-
made goods. (A: That’s all you see.) NRIs visiting India have a tough time finding
"Made in America" products for relatives.
As I say, that’s the agenda. That was the agenda when the General Agreement on Trade and
Tariffs was carried out with the Star Chamber who decided who would go where and they used
the taxpayer’s money. It’s incredible. Every government that signed it agreed to use the
taxpayers to up the plants, whole companies and firms and tooling and the whole lot, send it to
China, rebuild it for them over there and pay them for 10 years until they started to show what
they expected to for the right profits. They were taking all the jobs away BY DESIGN. Why?
Because it was time to bring the Western countries and especially the US and Canada down,
and down fast. Suddenly, everything was made in China. EVERYTHING was made in China. It
was an agenda… which tells you that China is NOT an enemy. You would NOT give your tooling
and your die ability to China if you needed to go to war with them one day. Believe you me, it
would never happen. Never happen.
There’s Dave from Arizona on the line. Are you there Dave?
Dave: I’d just like to bring up one point that you made about the lady who was arrested for
asking why. It’s literally to the point where you are told what to do and you’ll either do it or
you’ll be reprimanded for it.
Alan: Or you’ll be tazered or shot.
Dave: It’s just ridiculous.
Alan: It will come to that, one day. If they allow you to. They are getting us trained now to be
tazered in public for not immediately obeying whatever. I’m not kidding about that. I’m not
kidding, with the speed it’s going. The cop will be like Judge Dredd; he’ll be the executioner as
well and that will become the norm.
Dave: Which is why they’ve got to get rid of The Constitution because if you have freedom of
speech obviously you can ask why.
Alan: Exactly. Obviously they are telling you too, that you don’t even have freedom of speech.
You are getting arrested for asking a simple question.
Dave: Exactly. It’s just so out of control.
Alan: Well, this is the agenda. Believe you me, it’s far worse than even this one here. It’s far,
far worse. They have literally raised a generation who look at winners and losers. That’s what
it’s all about, winners and losers. They’ve raised a generation who played video games. The
heroes are the guys who win. They guys wearing all the black combat gear, the ninjas, have the
power. That’s what they see. It’s like joining the biggest gang in the world and that’s what they
want to do. That’s what goes into the cops and once you are in it, it’s the same as the military.
You are now a brother. You are part of the big gang. They’ll all look after each other. They
become technically a law unto themselves and THEY KNOW THAT. A few years ago in the US
and in Canada at the same time, when they started using hollow point bullets, it was passed as
okay to use hollow point bullets on citizens. It’s banned by the United Nations treaties; they
can’t use it in warfare against other countries but they can use them on their own citizens.
Suddenly there was a spate of shootings, cop shootings, killing everybody because of all their
targets, because hollow points kill pretty well; they leave an awful mess. There was no outcry
about it. There was no big hoopla. That was the message that came out clear at the time, that
the cops have been given new orders now to just go ahead and basically do it. That’s what’s
been happening for years now.
Dave: That’s the mind control, is that people will sell people out to be on top, to be a hero or
to be rich or to be… They are basically just paying people to sell people out.
Alan: You’re right. They will.
Dave: And it works, obviously.
Alan: It does work. It’s the same with academia. You get a lot of people in academia who
know what’s right and wrong but they go along with what is wrong, although it’s politically
correct, because their big paychecks in universities and their status and their tenures and all the
rest of it. Humanity, unfortunately, can prostitute itself very, very well for survival and
unfortunately, when there are tyrants in control then we are in big trouble, big trouble because
academia, big money and big government are all working together on this. It’s all part of the
military-industrial complex, including, by the way, academia.
Dave: Which goes along with the dehumanizing through the movies and through the TV and all
that.
Alan: Yes it is. It’s the movies they are churning out now that are so dehumanized and so full
of messages for the young to copy, to emulate. The old story was monkey see, money do,
that’s what children do, that’s what they see and they will copy it. They keep showing you a
future world where, yeah, there’s lots of promiscuity and all the rest of it and violence, the big
guys always win. The toughest guys always win and don’t worry about it. Otherwise you’ll be,
you know, scraping for food and living in back alleys and all the rest of it as we go down the
tubes. They expect a world of violence because people are going to be crammed into these
cities. Same experiments with the rats; the rats at a certain number in a big cage will treat each
other cordially. They have little rules. Once they get to a certain number of too many crammed
in, they start to bite each other; there is deviant behavior that breaks out. It’s the same with
people and THEY KNOW THIS at the top. They know this. I’ve got articles here where the big
boys have discussed it and that is why they’ve given us basically the black armies of ninja boys
with their armaments to take care of us as we are all put into these cities for the big, big
takedown, over many years.
Dave: They know it because they are going to make it happen.
Alan: That’s right. That’s the agenda. That is the agenda.
Dave: Unreal. It’s just sad because I think back to when I was a kid and I think things seemed a
lot easier, a lot better and obviously, it’s like in the last, I would say 10 years, 8 years, it has just
really gone down.
Alan: It’s on a roll, you see. All these organizations that work over the public take orders from
higher and higher authorities. They don’t do anything on their own. When they are given the
word, DON’T WORRY, IT’S TIME TO PUT IT UP A NOTCH AND BE A BIT MORE hard on you, they just go
ahead and do it. They are robots, basically, but once they get authority they will put it into
action, happily because they enjoy the power. There’s no doubt about it, it’s been authorized
from the very, very top, all the way down. There are very few policemen today that are ever
reprimanded for very long; they might lay them off for a week or two after killing folk or
whatever, or when the SWAT teams go in and kill the wrong people by mistake which happens
pretty often. In their zeal to get it done they want to just kill folk and they go into the wrong
houses; but when they do their investigations BY ex-cops, who work in an ex-cop fraternity, on
cops… what do you expect to happen? They are not going to condemn their own. They get off
with it. They get off with it and what a statement that is to the rest of the police, DON’T WORRY,
WE GET OFF WITH IT.
Dave: They are above the law.
Alan: This IS the new law.
Dave: I think what’s going to happen, Alan, is – I think you are in your 50s, I’m in my 40s – that
when our generation goes, nobody is even going to remember how it was.
Alan: They won’t remember because we adapt so quickly. That’s why they can even pull the
cons with the climate change. Your life is short. It spins by you. Most folk have no memory of
even 4 years ago, what the weather was like, so they can easily pull it off. Back after these
messages.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix and there is Jeff from Massachusetts.
Are you there Jeff?
Jeff: As far as what’s going on in America, this is my paranoid fantasy. That is, a long time ago,
the leaders of Russian and China and the Middle East told our American leaders, look, we have
you by the throat, we have enemy agents in your country, we can destroy your country through
scalar weapons, and your country is basically screwed. You give up all your resources, you let
us have cart blanche, you let us appoint our leaders into your office, do as you’re told and you
get a perfectly good life and if you don’t you’re screwed. That’s my paranoid fantasy of why all
this kookoo stuff is going on. I was just reading the Verona Papers which vindicated Joseph
McCarthy from when Joseph McCarthy had the black list on communist infiltrators, the Verona
Papers adjudicated him practically. I have a book called, American Sold Out, by Ray Hope and
in one of the chapters it talks about the SPCA and they are being conditioned to kill people
when the new world order finally arrives, when martial law is called. Human beings are going
to be exterminated like dogs. I believe it will be done by foreign troops and people from these
third world countries. They are going to be running this country.
Alan: There is no doubt, the army is almost international as it is. I don’t know if people realize
their armies are directed THROUGH the United Nations. They have been for years. NATO goes
through the United Nations. It’s interesting when they set up NATO and they set up the United
Nations with their Director General in charge of their war-making facilities and so on, it’s always
to be a Russian, by the way. Still in the treaty yet, there is always to be a Russian who is in
charge. He was in charge during the Korean War. The US couldn’t make a move without telling
him what they were going to do. He then told the communist side. He also ran the Warsaw
Pact countries. So they weren’t just a referee at the United Nations, they had set up both
NATO and its supposed opposition, the Warsaw Pact countries, to play this game together. The
big folk at the top know this but they are also killing us and have been killing us off since the 50s
through inoculations. I’ve got so much evidence here I could spend weeks just going on that.
It’s the same thing with India and Africa and Latin America. It’s come up again about the free
tetanus shots sterilizing all the women and aborting their children, once again. That first broke
out when they first did that openly back in the early 90s and they are still at it today. The
average IDIOT out there that goes for their shots today, whenever there’s another non-existent
flu… don’t believe for an instant that they are not going to do it for YOU as well. There’s no
difference between the peasant of China, India, Africa or Peru or Chile and YOU, as far as the
elite are concerned.
Jeff: Exactly. You are absolutely right. You know, the founder of the United Nations was Alger
Hiss who was a communist and he was listed in the Verona Papers.
Alan: He was also, he worked with a Canadian who worked with Lester B Pearson and the
Canadian was Escott Reid. He wrote about it in a book called, A Canadian Diplomat at the
United Nations. He became the Prime Minster of Canada, Pearson, and Escott Reid drafted it
up with Hiss. Then Pearson afterward became head of the United Nations for a while after he
was Prime Minister. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish any myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO
with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Casualties of Agenda-Driven Propaganda Hype-Suicide Pacts
Death of US Manufacturing
I’ve talked about this big system of what’s called socialism. All big movements tend to move
into socialism eventually and it’s backed by the bankers who PREFER a socialist society because
it’s much more well organized for THEM, especially the international money lenders. It’s far
better to have governments to demand money from its citizens to pay back to the money
lenders, than the money lenders basically loaning out money individually to millions of people.
They could never collect it all. They do it this way through TAXES, taxations and that’s why they
favor and promoted, for over 100 years, the introduction of world socialism. A SOCIALIST SOCIETY
IS A MANAGED SOCIETY FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE, is what they used to say. Cradle to grave, where
experts run by the government and agencies will run your life including what you will do, what
you will work at, and so on; in other words, A NEW SOVIET SYSTEM ON STEROIDS. Back with
more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about socialism basically
and its many branches because the Fabian Society have hundreds of branches around the world
and have had for 100 years or so, over 100 years in fact. Many of the politicians who are in
power today and those behind them and lots of their bureaucrats too are members of the
Fabian Society. As far as I can see, it’s really a branch, a specialized branch of the Royal
Institute of International Affairs which also has many other specialized branches into this
globalized world system, the socialist system, a controlled society, planned society.
They want the so-called ‘free flow of goods’ through free trade, as they call it, which is
RESTRICTED trade. It’s only the big boys, international corporations who can apply for free
trade. Also the free flow of labor, supposedly, which we know at the moment, is way overdone
because most of the immigrants flooding in to different parts of Europe are not really there
because they are needed for work. They are really going there because it’s the last place on
earth where they can get the welfare system and sometimes treatment as well, from a Health
Service, which is also crashing their health services. That’s also to destroy the existing
cultures and that was admitted by Tony Blair’s right-hand man. I read the article FROM the
mainstream newspaper from Britain where Blair had ordered TO OPEN THE FLOODGATES WIDE TO
COMPLETELY DESTROY THE BRITISH WAY OF LIFE FOREVER and it’s pretty well been accomplished. It’s
nothing to do with colors, groups or whatever.
You’ve got to understand THIS IS A WARFARE TACTIC THAT’S BEING USED ON PEOPLES ACROSS
THE WHOLE OF EUROPE. There are also wars going across the world where a lot of these
people are coming from. That’s always standard. People flee from these countries especially
when they know it’s going to be a long haul war. These wars are now lasting 20-odd years.
Remember, what we are seeing in Iraq right now is a continuation of Gulf War I, going on for
many, many, many years. This is called PERPETUAL WAR, perpetual warfare technique. I’ve
read articles from even the US military about this and how they do it and how they are going to
keep doing it until everyone is STANDARDIZED under a common culture. A culture, really, that
is socialist.
As we are all playing ourselves and thinking we are having the time of our lives, those that are
young I should say, you have no idea of the system they are bringing in. Once they have got
one they want, believe you me, all your rights, privileges and your fun will be taken away from
you. See, control freaks can’t stand people really having fun. They also use that as a
weapon AGAINST YOU at the moment. They’ve been doing that since the 1950s onwards really
and speeding up it to DESTROY society. TO CONQUER, as many of the top socialists have said
even in the 1800s, YOU HAVE TO TOTALLY DEGRADE THE SOCIETIES AND THEN YOU COME IN TO CONTROL
THEM.
Part of the Fabian system was depopulation. It also was the abolition of private property and
all property would be in the hands of the state. We have this strange deal of public/private
partnerships. That’s the socialist way of having the means of production. They also have the
means of distribution, which will come with rationing and so on for the NEW world order. I’ve
got articles here FROM the UN explaining this new world order. As I say, the abolition of
private property and even land itself is to be taken over by governments. So they are using
global warming and land degradation, anything they can dream up is being used now and
implemented. A war has been going on, on a HUGE scale financed by the biggest bankers on
the planet and the biggest foundations, which they run, with hundreds of think tanks working
for over 100 years with organizations and non-governmental organizations implementing,
drafting all this legalese, bureaucrat-speak, for us all and it’s all being presented to
governments and they are signing them in automatically as we live.
Part of it also was to do with the depopulation program AND as Julian Huxley himself said, who
worked for the United Nations for UNESCO. He said WE’VE GOT TO TAKE HUMAN BEING OFF THEIR
PEDESTALS AS THE MOST ADVANCED CREATION AND DEHUMANIZE THEM. PUT THEM DOWN TO THE LEVEL OF THE
ANIMALS WITH NO MORE RIGHTS OR SPECIALITIES ABOUT THEM. That’s happened in many different ways
until we accept things like organ harvesting from fetuses and putting fetuses in blenders for
make-up and lipstick and all that stuff. Horrible stuff like that. You all know this stuff, those
who listen to the show. You’ve heard it all before and I’ve read from the mainstream. I don’t
guess at this stuff and I don’t use conspiracy sites. You don’t have to. It’s interesting. HG Wells
called the organization he worked for and this plan of global conquest, he called it ‘The Open
Conspiracy.’ He wrote about that in one of his books called The Open Conspiracy. You should
read it yourselves. IT’S ALL THERE FOR THOSE THAT WANT TO FIND IT. WE ALWAYS PUBLISH WHAT
WE DO AND WHAT WE PLAN… HG Wells knew that for most folk there is nothing exciting in it. There
is no sex and violence and the chase and the thrill. It’s just dry, boring, bureaucratic reading.
You can still find these books in the libraries.
The other part of it was depopulation by what they called the death rate, increasing the DEATH
rate. Not just the birth rate, increasing the death rate. So you decrease the birth rate, increase
the death rate of those who are alive through various means and cancers, etc that were one of
the things that they talked about 50 years ago. We all see how it’s been introduced. We know
it’s going rampant and everybody is just stunned at the bottom level of science as to what’s
happening and apparently it’s no big deal; it’s no crisis even though 1 out of 2 are supposed to
die of cancer now. They know what’s doing it because THERE IS A HIGHER LEVEL OF SCIENCE.
Just like you have an FBI, you’ve got a CIA way above them and organizations even above
them.
Euthanasia was also discussed and of course we know that George Bernard Shaw gave the talk
back in the early 20s about, IF YOU WANT TO LIVE, YOU MUST WORK,basically, AND YOU MUST COME TO
US – meaning those who will rule the socialist governments, the Fabians –and he said, YOU MUST
JUSTIFY YOUR EXISTENCE OF WHY WE SHOULD ALLOW YOU TO LIVE . You will only be allowed to live if you
SERVE THEIR SYSTEM and they NEED you to serve their system, otherwise they will kill you. You
can hear that little talk he gave on The Soviet Story, an excellent, excellent documentary to
see. It shows you what you are in for and they are using all those methods but they’ve also got
more advanced, improved methods because, you see, they wanted to kill you more humanely.
In other words, you wouldn’t know what was killing you. They don’t have to shoot you in the
back of the head any more. They can put it into your inoculations and your food, which was
also discussed. George Bernard Shaw also asked the scientists of the world, especially Britain,
to COME UP WITH A GAS THAT COULD PAINLESSLY KILL THE UNWANTED – the unwashed masses basically,
those that they didn’t need – that would kill them in a humane fashion, painless. Well, we
know who took up that idea. So don’t blame Germany for everything; they got all their ideas
from Britain.
Here is an article from the Mail Online. [Article altered and changed as of March 3, 2010.]
‘Euthanasia by the back door’: Fears over ‘compassion’ loophole in new
assisted suicide guidelines.
Mail Online / February 25, 2010
LONDON -- New guidelines on assisted suicide could usher in euthanasia through the
'back door' and will increase the risk to the seriously ill and disabled, it was claimed
today. (Alan: Well, that’s why it’s there. That’s why they’re putting it in actually.)
Critics immediately attacked the updated approach to people who help others to die,
unveiled this morning by the Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer.
The final guidelines shifted the focus from the victims health to the
suspects motivation making clear any one acting out of compassion would be unlikely to
face prosecution. (A: Well, they had an organization, you know, in Germany from the
Department of Hygiene, they called it, that was sent around to the different hospitals and
anyone who was deemed to be on the way out or if they were called mentally feeble and so
on were euthanized by these specialists. But they got their ideas from the Soviet Union,
remember, and that’s also explained in The Soviet Story, stuff they have kept quiet for an
awful long time.)
But some campaigners condemn the changes and Members of Parliament demanded a
Commons debate claiming they are being denied the chance to discuss the controversial
issue.
Torry Mark Pritchard said, “This is a real concern out in the community that this house is
not having a say. People are very concerned that this is a new back door to euthanasia in
the UK.
Of course it is and it’s really also to get what they call ‘raising public awareness.’ There are
legalities in this system that we live and how the legalities work is they raise these topics and IF
WE ARE SILENT WE ARE GIVING CONSENT. So this is a LEGAL DECLARATION, what I’m reading
here to the public, like a notice you might say, legally accepted as a notice to the public. It
doesn’t matter if they read it or not. But if they are silent on the decision then you have given
your consent. That literally is how they work this big scheme of theirs. It’s quite something
that’s going on but that’s only one area of this whole massive attack.
I’ve talked about the early experimental schools run by Lord Bertrand Russell and others that
were given Royal Charters to run them and do things to children that would have gotten
anyone else hung at the time. He was promoting pre-pubertal sex and so on to see if they
children would have problems bonding later in life. If they didn’t bond, they would be less
likely to have children. That was one of the main reasons. The other reason was to try
techniques of SCIENTIFIC INDOCTRINATION that would be put through to the children so that
their parents’ input, their parents’ moral values and so on, would be OVERRULED by the
scientific indoctrination of the children. He explains some of this in a book called, Education
and the Good Life and you can do your search from his other books where he puts in the other
stuff.
It’s great how THEY SCATTER THE KNOWLEDGE IN DIFFERENT BOOKS, you know. Unfortunately
I get calls and emails from people who say, WHERE CAN I FIND THIS, WHAT BOOK IS IT? Well, you
know, you might have half a dozen books to go through to put it all together, books where the
same person has either authored the whole lot of them or written parts in other books.
Everybody just expects everything… it’s like a fast food hamburger; they expect it like a drive
through, just give me what I want to know. It takes years to accumulate this kind of knowledge,
but they want it all in a minute. That’s their patience today. When I get these people I just
ignore them. I don’t answer them. The music is coming in and we’ll get into some very good
topics tonight when I come back from these messages.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Bertrand Russell
and others who very successfully had their schemes implemented through the National
Educational authority systems across the world basically. Again, that’s
the STANDARDIZATION process that the Fabians were obsessed about. Here is an article from
the utter hypocrites that they are, the BBC. I really can’t stand the hypocrisy of the media
because you should see some of the stuff, and people sometimes burn the occasional play or
whatever that they are putting out today and if you want basic pornography, just watch this
stuff. Here they are, the BBC…
Children ‘over exposed to sexual imagery'
(A: What a joke, eh?)
By Dominic Casciani / BBC News / February 26, 2010
Children are being increasingly exposed to sexual imagery and their parents have limited
opportunities to stop it, a report for the Home Office warns.
The report calls for tougher regulation of sexual imagery in adverts and a ban on selling
"lads' mags" to under-16s.
It also recommends selling mobile phones and games consoles with parental controls
automatically switched on.
Author Dr Linda Papadopoulos said there was a clear link between sexualised imagery and
violence towards females. (A: She’s going the other way. Ha. So that’s why she’s
getting the grant to do this obviously. That’s ALL socialist countries. Most of these
authors LIVE on grants from the governments so they can put stuff out there for the NGOs
that the government also helps to finance. A lot of people get abuse, believe you me. It
isn’t just women. It’s not just adults or children. ALL get abused in this kind of
disgusting society in which we live today.)
Her report said the material children were being exposed to included the growth of lads'
mags and pornography on mobile phones, through to big-name fashion brands using sexual
imagery to advertise clothes targeted at young teenagers.
You know, the BBC have been churning out music stuff, shows and so on, since the 50s and
right through they keep changing and changing and changing them. I can remember even
Benny Hill used to be on and if you wanted stuff that was so near, so near to the target, that
was the show to watch. Believe you me, the BBC helped to lead this whole charge into this new
system that we are now into today and really suffering from as well. It’s just fascinating to
watch the hypocrisy of really what’s getting pushed out there and listen to the media.
This article I mentioned a few nights ago where students in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, had the
school teachers activating their laptops at home, remotely, and watching them and listening to
them. Here is an article about ANOTHER incident that happened before that, that apparently
was already on public broadcasting station, the PBS where a school administrator boasts to PBS
about his laptop spying. It’s a documentary. This is from, it’s called, boingboing.net web site.
I’ll put this up too at the end of the show; all these links will go up there IF XplorNet graces me
with my double up dial up speed, it’s supposed to be high speed, to upload it.
School administrator boasts to PBS about his laptop spying
By Cory Doctorow February 25, 2010
A few weeks ago, Frontline premiered a documentary called "Digital Nation". In one
segment, the vice-principle of Intermediate School 339, Bronx, NY, Dan Ackerman,
demonstrates how he "remotely monitors" the students' laptops for "inappropriate use". (his
demonstration begins at 4:36)
He says "They don't even realize we are watching," "I always like to mess with them and
take a picture," and "9 times out of 10, THEY DUCK OUT OF THE WAY." (A: That’s
his little joke, I guess.)
He says the students "use it like it's a mirror" and he watches. He says 6th and 7th graders
have their cameras activated. (A: This is the article I read previously.) It looks like the
same software used by the Pennsylvania school that is being investigated for covertly
spying on students through their webcams.
The shocking thing about this is that the privacy concerns were not even mentioned in
the Frontline documentary! (A: Well, you see, we are all so jaded now with watching all
this rubbish on TV that what’s to shock you anymore? Really? What is there to shock you
anymore?)
This is pretty amazing footage -- especially (as Scott notes) the absence of any questions
about student privacy from the interviewer. I keep trying to imagine what my education
would have been like if all my conversations, reading, doodling, writing, etc, had been
monitored, in real time, by my teachers. (A: Then he goes on to say how great his
teachers were and so on and so on.)
Then, when you go into the other article... This article is from News Solio. It says,
Students Spied on Via Laptop Computers by Lower Merion School
District in Philadelphia, Claim
Thursday, February 18, 2010 / By Newsolio Editor
(A: This is the other one that I was talking about that broke out recently. I’ll put this link
up too.)
Philadelphia, PA- Parents are outraged after a school district was accused of spying on
students at home via their laptop computers in a legal case straight out of a technology
nightmare.
It’s claimed that big brother was watching as students of Lower Merion School district
schools went about their activities on their specially issued laptop computers.
A suit filed with a US court, Blake J Robbins v Lower Merion School District (PA) et al,
claims that students were spied on at home via the laptop web cams.
The case claims that an assistant principal told a student the school district knew he “was
engaged in improper behavior in his home, and cited as evidence a photograph from the
webcam embedded in minor plaintiff’s personal laptop issued by the school district.”
Outraged families from the suburban Philadelphia Lower Merion School District said
Webcam-equipped personal laptop computers were issued to 1,800 high school students at
three high schools.
There is another link here tying in with this. It gives you the system that they are using to spy
on these children and it’s from StrydeHax.blogspot.com. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I’m giving out the link tonight,
go into the web site at the end of the show and you’ll see this as well, all these sites will be
linked there. StrydeHax is the guy who gives you the data that you need to know if you want to
know if your laptop has this system installed in it that allows them to remotely access it. It’s
called LANRev and it’s from StrydeHax. It says…
Network Fingerprint for LANRev Agent
Monday, February 22, 2010 / StrydeHax.blogspot.com
Analysis of the LANRev software used to spy at Harriton High continues; for now, I
wanted to give everyone a way to detect if a machine has the software installed remotely;
this won't tell if its webcam features are active. You'll need a Unix command line with the
"netcat" utility installed. (A: He goes through all this stuff which you can read for yourself
telling you how to use it. If you scroll down he tells you, really, who designed this system
and it happens to be one of the teachers who is in charge of technology at one of the
schools that is listed in the lawsuit. He was the guy who designed the spy network.)
This investigation into the remote spying allegedly being conducted against students at
Lower Merion represents an attempt to find proof of spying and a look into the toolchain
used to accomplish spying. Taking a look at the LMSD Staff List, Mike Perbix is listed as
a Network Tech at LMSD. Mr. Perbix has a large online web forum footprint as well as a
personal blog, and a lot of his posts, attributed to his role at Lower Merion, provide insight
into the tools, methods, and capabilities deployed against students at LMSD. Of the three
network techs employed at LMSD, Mr. Perbix appears to have been the mastermind
behind a massive, highly effective digital panopticon.
PanoMasterMind
The primary piece of evidence, already being reported on by a Fox affiliate, is this amazing
promotional webcast (A: And the link is here, you’ll see the promotional webcast for the
spying gear that this teacher designed.) for a remote monitoring product named LANRev.
In it, Mike Perbix identifies himself as a high school network tech, and then speaks at
length about using the track-and-monitor features of LanRev to take surreptitious
remote pictures through a high school laptop webcam. (A: So one of the perpetrators
actually is boasting about how to do it on this promotional webcast.) A note of particular
pride is evident in his voice when he talks about finding a way outside of LANRev to
enable "curtain mode", a special remote administration mode that makes remote control of
a laptop invisible to the victim. Listen at 35:47, when he says:
"you're controlling someone's machine, you don't want them to know what
you're doing"
-Mike Perbix
It isn't until 37 minutes into the video till Perbix begins talking about the Theft Tracking
feature, which causes the laptop to go into a mode where it beacons its location and silent
webcam screenshots out to an Internet server controlled by the school. (A: Isn’t that just
dandy for perverts? Isn’t that dandy for the perverts, eh? And you think there is not
organized perverts out there? There certainly are. There have been lots of features in the
newspaper articles over the years, a lot of them in high places too.)
The beacon feature appears to have been one of the primary methods for remote spying,
however, network footprints abound over the details and architecture of the remote
administration effort. In this post, Perbix discusses methods for remotely resetting the
firmware lockout used to prevent jailbreaking of student laptops. A jailbreak would have
allowed students to monitor their own webcam to determine if administrators were truly
taking pictures or if, as the school administration claimed, the blinking webcams were just
"a glitch."
Perbix also maintains a prolific blog, where in this blog post he describes using the remote
monitoring feature to locate a stolen laptop:
"As a prime example, we initially attempted to recover a stolen laptop that reported
back to us its internet address and DNS name. The police went to the house and were
befuddled to find out the people we knew had the laptop was not the family that
lived there...well, we eventually found out that they were the neighboring house and
were borrowing the unsecured WI-FI." (A: Amazing, eh?)
In a September 2009 post that may come to haunt this investigation, Perbix posted a
scripting method for remote enable/disable of the iSight camera in the laptops. This post
makes a lot more sense when Perbix puts it in context on an admin newsgroup, (A: All
these links are all in this article here for you to see by this particular teacher. That’s all
I’ll say right now but it just shows you, nothing is for free. Here is your laptop, your
school is giving you a laptop, thousands of them get laptops and here these characters
have been spying on them for goodness knows how long. And by the way, they were giving
courses in how to use this particular spyware to other teachers from outside the state, so
this will be nationwide.)
What a world we live in eh? What a world. I’m also putting a link up that was leaked initially
from the United Nations. I think it was FoxNews.com that came out with it. It’s very
interesting. It’s their whole agenda for the green economy. It wasn’t supposed to be leaked to
the public. I’ll put the link up tonight on my site to the PDF and you can download it yourself. It
goes into how long they have been working on this and it says that global warming and so on –
because it’s been hyped up, blah, blah, blah – basically will be the MEANS by which they will
take over and bring in this new greening economy and how they can take advantage of all the
crises, etc and weather, famines, all that kind of stuff, to bring all this about. This is from their
own, supposedly, secret documentation right here. I’ll put that link up for you to see.
Now, let’s go back to the Club of Rome, the guys that dreamed up the idea for using global
warming to get this about, back in the 1970s. This is from their book, The First Global
Revolution, by the founders of the Club of Rome, the PREMIERE environmental think thank for
the United Nations. They are the consultants to the United Nations on this. Alexander King,
the co-founder that wrote in the book, published in 1991, that back in the 1970s they were
given the job to find a way and to find reasons to bring the whole world together for a common
cause, against a common enemy and he says…
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we
came up with the IDEA that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages,
famine and the like would FIT THE BILL. (A: That would fit the bill. An IDEA would
fit the bill.) All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is
humanity itself.”
That’s what they presented to the United Nations and we’ve all seen the effects of it since. All
the lies they’ve been spouting out there by all these paid-off scientists that work for the IPCC
and we’ve seen all these scandals that broke out when their lies get exposed; however, it won’t
make a bit of difference because this is THE ONE AGENDA that they must stick with to get all of
this carbon taxes, another way to pummel you into the ground through poverty and take your
land from you, etc. They won’t change their mind. I don’t care if you are up to your eyeballs in
snow, like I am here and Britain is too, they are still going to go ahead with this. They’ve got
nothing else in the bag.
Just to get right back to how this ties in with land, I said at the beginning that the Fabian Society
talked about basically how people wouldn’t have private property anymore. Now, there will
still be the big mansions and so on for VIPs that run the world to live in and that means
themselves, etc, and the scientists. We will maintain them for them, of course, they won’t have
to pay anything, just like the Soviet system but technically no one would own anything. We’ll
all be living in little green shacks, scattered about at the edge of the forest or something. It says
here…
Land management in UK must change to cope with climate change
(A: So here they’re pushing now for the takeover of all the land, now that basically
they’ve put most of the folks out of their houses, through the managed financial crisis.)
By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent / 26 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
Britain faces rising water bills, housing shortages and destruction of wildlife unless the
way land is managed is completely reformed, scientists have warned. (A: SCIENTISTS
again. Science is the new priesthood.)
Professor John Beddington, the Government's chief scientific adviser, said sticking with
"business as usual" was not an option in the face of pressures such as climate change and
population increases over the next 50 years.
The Foresight report on the future of land use said addressing these major challenges
would need a strategic and integrated approach, rather than the fragmented policies of the
past.
Land is also likely to come under pressure from an increasingly wealthy population to
provide more living space and recreation, and the need to produce food and green energy -
from wind farms to fuels made from crops - to meet targets on renewables.
Pressure on land and the resources it provides is expected to be particularly acute in the
South East, where population is expected to grow most but where water is most scarce and
most of the best farmland is found. (A: Last night I read the article to do with the Mega
Cities. You see, the real agenda is to have us all off the land and crammed on top of each
other in these super Mega Cities. The United Nations are the boys, again, who deal with
that. In fact, the United Nations deals with everything in your life whether you know it or
not. That’s the reality of it. That’s the reality of it.)
So here they are talking about all the things that the Club of Rome dreamed up a long time ago
and overpopulation being one of them. Now, overpopulation… This is a FORCED issue,
remember, because the UN itself, when it reports its statistics every year says that the native
populations of Europe and Britain have been FALLING for the last 40-50 years. They’re all good
people, you see, DON’T HAVE ANY MORE THAN 1.2 CHILDREN PER FAMILY, so they all complied.
Margaret Thatcher turned around when she was in and says, WE’VE GOT TO OPEN THE FLOOD GATES
TO IMMIGRATION BECAUSE THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH BRITISH PEOPLE GIVING BIRTH TO CHILDREN TO PAY OFF THE
NATIONAL DEBT. No kidding. See, it’s all worked out way in advance. So when you think you are
pleasing your government, believe you me, you are just going along with a part of a plan to do
you in completely, as Tony Blair proved in that article that I mentioned earlier where he
says, THEY’D DESTROY THE FACE OF BRITAIN FOREVER. That was his agenda.
This article is from the Mail Online.
Two passports a minute are given to foreigners as 1.5m issued since
Labour elected
By James Slack / 26th February 2010 / Mail Online
Passports were given to foreigners at the rate of two a minute last year.
Officials approved a record 203,865 citizenship applications, 58 per cent more than in
2008.
Another 190,000 immigrants were given the right to settle in the UK in 2009 – a rise of 30
per cent on the year before. (A: Remember, these immigrants are allowed, under
international law, through the UN, to bring in their extended families as well and they then
apply for them.)
Home Office figures show that 1.5million foreigners have become UK citizens since
Labour (A: government) came to power.
In 1997, just 37,010 were granted the status.
Officials claim the massive rises during the past year may have been caused by migrants
rushing to beat the supposedly tougher system of earned citizenship due to start next year.
From then, obtaining a passport will usually take between six and eight years from a
migrant’s arrival in the UK – rather than the current five.
The figures also reflect the huge influx into Britain in the early part of the last decade.
This is how they encourage the thing. It wouldn’t happen, believe you me, unless
they wanted it to happen. Then they turn around and say, MY GOD, LOOK, THERE’S TOO MANY
PEOPLE, THERE’S TOO MANY PEOPLE. Do you understand, in the Western world if these immigration
quotas hadn’t been massively pumped up by design they could never pull off this ‘too many
people’ scam? It would never work. The populations were DECLINING, so it would never work.
They had to pump them in and say, SEE, THERE’S TOO MANY OF YOU and then the laws are passed on
all of you.
This is a 100 year old plan. It’s actually older. It’s all coming into play now. In fact, Bertrand
Russell said in the 1920s, about all these techniques that are being used and implemented at
that time, WOULD BEGIN TO BECOME APPARENT AT THE END OF THE MILLENNIUM AND INTO THE NEW . Lenin
said the same thing about the West. You are seeing it all happening right now.
I’ll go to the phone calls now and there is Kevin from Ontario. Are you there Kevin?
Kevin: Alan, hello. Have you been to North Bay recently?
Alan: Not recently no.
Kevin: Around here they are throwing around a little shirt buttons everywhere that
say, “STUDENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY.” You know, UN’s Agenda 21 for ‘sustainable development.’
You know, the depopulation agenda, they are pushing the depopulation agenda here on the
students saying THE WORLD IS OVERPOPULATED, IT NEEDS TO BE DEPOPULATED. And you see, it’s a
desensitization using words, right. If they said to people, WE’VE GOT TO KILL 90% OF THE
POPULATION that would turn people off, right.
Alan: That’s right.
Kevin: So they use the soft language so people, the masses of sleeping people out there will go
along with the program: SURE, WE’VE GOT TO DEPOPULATE, DEPOPULATE, DEPOPULATE.
Alan: This is a steady drumbeat for years and people don’t realize… Most folk out there are
actually already programmed into believing it.
Kevin: It’s ridiculous. I think we spoke about this last time, a lot of people realize what’s going
on. Some of them discretely look into the “conspiracies” and all that. There is really only one
conspiracy and that’s for world government. They look into this but a lot of them just have a
thing of apathy. They know the news is full of BS. They know that the independent media on
the internet is the most truthful you are going to find, if anywhere, but there are not many that
are really standing up and doing anything about it.
Alan: Part of the problem is they don’t know what they can do about it. I think they
understand on a level that this is so huge… it’s massive… we are under the most massively,
well-organized organization that has ever existed on this planet. That is coming from the
United Nations and there are literally thousands of branches coming out of it into every
country, going all through academia of course, with instant access to all international media.
They get all their programs on TV all the time on overpopulation, pollution, weather change and
so on. And we say to ourselves, WELL, WHAT CAN WE DO? WE CANNOT HAVE ACCESS TO ANY OF THIS
STUFF. Money rules the world. That’s your key. The bankers who set up the Royal Institute of
International Affairs were the international bankers who then put out the foundations that fund
the thousands of NGOs. They also give grants to every university across the planet. Just look at
the Rockefellers. Every university in Canada gets its list of things to talk about and push
because they get the Rockefeller grants. This is how big this is and they always go for the
youth. They always go for the up-and-coming generations because they get a bit more
indoctrination than the previous bunch. Beria talked about this in the 1930s at the Comintern
meeting, the International Communist Meeting. He said, IT USED TO TAKE 70 YEARS TO BRAINWASH
AND CHANGE A POPULATION INTO A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WAY OF LOOKING AT ANYTHING; NOW WE CAN DO IT
IN 5 YEARS AND EVENTUALLY WE’LL BE ABLE TO DO IT EVERY 6 MONTHS TO A YEAR . And that’s happening
now. Hold on and I’ll be back after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’re talking to Kevin
from Ontario. You still there Kevin?
Kevin: Yes. Well, I’m not all there but I’m still here.
Alan: That’s good enough.
Kevin: You are talking about they are going after the kids first. Absolutely and I can tell that
first hand with one of the professors I got at Canada College, the social issues, through a film
professor and he is pushing socialism in his class.
Alan: Oh, they all are. This is the mandate for Canada.
Kevin: When he and I talked privately, we pretty much speak the same language about the fact
that the multi-billion dollar corporations are, pretty much seem to be a totalitarian police state.
Not only in this country, the United States and Britain and all the Western countries are, they
are killing off our freedoms. They are setting up a socialist world government and he fully
agreed with me. In front of the class, he’ll laugh, he’ll just call me a crazy person. When we
were talking he said, YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. But he’s trying to say that it’s a good thing.
Alan: I know. I know they flog this idea and that’s what Bezmenov said, the ex-KGB defector in
the video up there. If you search for him, Bezmenov, he gives the whole technique and he
says, ONCE WE COME INTO POWER, THEN ALL YOUR RIGHTS ARE STRIPPED OFF YOU. The first ones they go
for are those ones who pushed what they thought was socialism because they will object when
they find out it’s not the utopia they expected, and the new system will not tolerate them
because they are the first ones to rebel, so they are eliminated right away.
Kevin: With this one professor, I’ve been telling a few of my classmates, who do listen to me,
by the way. I try to wake up as many people as I can just by talking to people one on one. I’ll
tell them how this new world order system affects them. I get into a conversation and tell
them, you might want to watch this guy, he’s gonna speak our little language but then he’s
going to start saying this world government is good. I tell them, watch out for this guy. I told
one of my classmates, I’m going to invite Tom out for a beer one of the nights. He said, why
would you do that, they guy’s one of your enemies. I say, keep your friends close and your
enemies closer.
Alan: That’s right.
Kevin: Like, keep a good watch on this guy. This is going out to all the young people out there
that are listening to this show that are going through the colleges, be careful, you might find
some of these professors are going to start speaking your language but they are going to start
saying this world government system is a good thing. I tell people that this world government
system, the people who are running it, these people are not fit to run a McDonald’s, quite
frankly.
Alan: No and believe you me, they are totalitarian and once they truly have all the power
there, you’ll find out it’s not going to be a nice brave new world where you are doped on soma.
You will be under the iron fist. That’s the way socialism runs because it is completely control
freaks from start to finish. It’s an ordered life from cradle to grave. They tell you what to do.
They order you what to do. Also, if you don’t work, you die. That was the Soviet motto too.
They took that from the Old Testament. That will come in as well. There’s no such thing as the
welfare state. Under their system, no one is unemployed, believe you me.
Kevin: I wonder when are they gonna finally implement this? I think, judging from what I’ve
done research on, is that I think they are going to let mother nature run a few courses over the
next couple of years and once mother nature decides… because you know, the infrastructure
has been put in place for the global elite to survive some big cataclysm. They know what’s
coming.
Alan: What they do is take your tax money and they prepare for ANY possibility their think
tanks can come up with in order to maintain… See, the first thing in this totalitarian system is
its OWN SELF-PRESERVATION. That’s the first thing that must come through any possible
thing. The think tanks look at all these problems and try and find ways to survive FOR
THEMSELVES, through every single one of them. Even the people starving and maybe rebelling,
that’s all taken care of too. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO
with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Backdoor Euthanasia
Bronx School Administrator Boasts about remotely Accessing Students' Computers and
Watching Them
Reality, reality, reality… everybody is clutching for some kind of reality. Well, not everybody is
clutching for reality, they think they have it because it’s presented to them every day by their
television and their radio and the movies that they’re watching. That IS their reality, to be
honest with you, for most people, because the technique of indoctrination has been so well
perfected with mass communication. Of course, you understand too, that all down through
time money has gone towards a military-industrial complex of one form or another. Most folk
don’t even know that a knight of the Middle Ages just didn’t have one horse, his lance, his spear
and a squire to get him, and his little castle to live in, he had a string of horses. He didn’t have
one horse. Even during the crusades they had about 5 or 6 horses each in the train. It cost the
equivalent of a LEER JET to keep them going. So somebody was making an awful lot of money
off of the military and they always have done, since long before that even. The Phoenicians had
basically the patent, you might say, because they had the secrets of where to get the materials
to make the bronze for spears and swords and they kept that quiet for hundreds of years. Back
with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about reality and how
it is projected TO us. Most folk don’t have much of a chance because you get brainwashed
when you are born and your parents will download to YOU the reality that THEY were given
because they haven’t questioned anything either. They complain about politics and this guy in
politics or that guy, but they don’t really understand what’s going on. Why should they,
because they truly believe the media is there to do their thinking for them. They honestly do.
Reality is such a hard, hard thing to grasp. I’ve talked about how the world is planned with
different phases of the plan and some are 5-year plans, some are 10, some are 50, some 100,
some 120-150 years. If you go into the United Nations and the various organizations they have
and their agendas, they use the same technique of 5, up to 100-year plans for different parts
of THE WORLD INTEGRATED SOCIALIST SYSTEM. You’ll find that in the Economic Union of
Europe, same idea from their parliament. So we are run by these plans and we are not
supposed to know. We are supposed to play and work and have some fun and don’t think too
much. Never before in history have we had such really cheap entertainment, such a mass of it,
to keep our minds from thinking about anything and yet entertainment also does another
function and that’s to download lots of messages for predictive programming into YOU. ItGIVES
YOU your opinions in pretty well every topic you can imagine.
I’ve mentioned before how at the beginning of the 20th century, the Fabians were talking about
a post-industrial society, a world society run by a socialist system. Socialism means that the
experts, those who are fittest to rule, should have the right to rule, all the intelligentsia and
academia and people with the right kind of knowledge, you know. You just cannot manage
your lives properly and so with this big system, with the masses… The term “the masses” broke
out with the industrial era. You stopped being people anymore and you became the mass, the
masses. It’s been the same right up until the present time. They still use that. Everything is
based on MASS MANAGEMENT but it also means that every individual HAS TO be completely
predictable and hence the need for complete surveillance on every single person and the
internet and all the other toys we have were given to us for that purpose.
They also said at the beginning of the 20th century that eventually they would crowd everybody
into Super Cities. In the 90s, the United Nations had a day for the opening, of their statement
at least – they open a lot of things in the air – to do with the beginning of Super Cities. The
projects were to go ahead. Not many people looked in to what they were talking about
because it seemed kind of wishy-washy at the time, not very clear at all and we tend to ignore
things that aren’t spelled out in, like, child-speak to us. It was the creation, first of all, of the
amalgamation of existing main cities with all those smaller ones that had grown up around
them, various townships as well. Then the push would be on to depopulate the rural
areas; THAT’S ALWAYS BEEN A PRIME THING TO DO FOR SOCIALIST COUNTRIES. They move the
people from the country into the mega cities where they can be more properly managed, under
many different pretexts of course, as well.
We’ve seen that happen in places like Canada and other countries across the world where they
have amalgamated everything, CENTRALIZED them into theMAIN city. All the taxation for your
state, your province, comes from your MAIN Super City where it used to be basically spread out
from the different ones. That’s why it’s so inefficient because you cannot have… the further
away that your government goes from YOU, the less chance there is they are going to bothered
about you; you are just another one of the many around them that they don’t really want to
look at.
I also mentioned that I think it was Detroit that was going to be one of the first cities to be
basically demolished around the urban area. Urban sprawl, as they call it, is a dirty thing.
That’s why they called it ‘sprawl;’ it’s the linguistics they use. Obama talked about his projects
that he’d taken from someone else that came forward, to talk about how they would demolish
these old urban areas, where people live, and they’ve moved all the work or the factories out.
This article shows you how they don’t just say something. Legally they have to tell you, in a
sense. It doesn’t mean they have to explain it to you. They just have to tell you, make the
statement or use the term like ‘new world order’ like Papa Bush and Mr Blair and then Brown at
the different G20 meetings, as all the newspapers said. THEY MEAN WHAT THEY SAY and we
tend to ignore it thinking it doesn’t really affect us. This article is from the Detroit News. It
says…
Detroit Mayor Bing emphasizes need to shrink city
Detroit mayor Dave Bing says the city plans to encourage residents to move from some
neighborhoods: "If they stay where they are I absolutely cannot give them all the services
they require."
Mayor says it's not 'an easy conversation,' but people, services must be focused to save city
CHRISTINE MACDONALD / The Detroit News / February 25, 2010 / detnews.com
(Alan: As I say, they will use any excuse, you see, so it will be easier for THEM to have
all your little walk-in clinics and different things, and social work departments, it’s less far
to go for the Children’s Aid to go and steal your children from you when it’s all
centralized and you are all squashed together like sardines living on top of each other.)
Detroit --Mayor Dave Bing said Wednesday he "absolutely" intends to relocate residents
from desolate neighborhoods and is bracing for inevitable legal challenges when he unveils
his downsizing plan. (A: That’s a clearance, by the way, not downsizing. It’s called
CLEARANCES; they’ve done clearances all down through history and it is a clearance
project.)
In his strongest statements about shrinking the city since taking office, Bing told WJR-760
AM the city is using internal and external data to decide "winners and losers." (A:
Winners and losers… that’s all you are.) The city plans to save some neighborhoods and
encourage residents to move from others, he said. (A: ‘Encourage’… ha. What does
encouragement mean, eh?)
"If we don't do it, you know this whole city is going to go down. (A: Well no kidding. I
thought it already had.) I'm hopeful people will understand that," Bing said. "If we
can incentivize (A: ‘Incentivize’… that’s a good one.) some of those folks that are in
those desolate areas, they can get a better situation." (A: Really?)
"If they stay where they are I absolutely cannot give them all the services they require."
He said there's no timeline, price tag or estimate on the number of people who would have
to be moved, but said federal funding would be needed. (A: Well that’s already been
pretty well put on the books.) Bing said he plans to focus on the neighborhoods in which
Detroit Public Schools plans to build schools with $500.5 million in bonds voters approved
last year. (A: So once again, it’s for the children. You understand, you’ve got to sacrifice
for the children because in this society we love children so much, that’s why the abortion
clinics are chomping out the smoke that no one complains about in that particular case.)
"You can't support every neighborhood," Bing told WJR's Frank Beckmann. "You can't
support every community across this city. (A: Well, you see, something has happened
because you shouldn’t have to support them at all. Is that what government is for? …to
support you? Is that what government really is there for, to support you?) Those
communities that are stable, we can't allow them to go down the tubes. That's not a good
business decision from my vantage point." (A: So your home and where you live is really
a business.)
Bing acknowledged it won't be "an easy conversation." And he's already facing opposition
from activists such as Ron Scott, who said he is "adamantly opposed" and believes the
business community is pushing Bing to get cheap access to large tracts of the city. (A: Of
course, that’s also true as well. And you know the ones they pick on first, the ones that are
at rock bottom, maybe behind in a few payments, and those are the ones that they pick on
first, or the unemployed. It’s an old, old story; nothing new in it really at all, is it?)
I’ll put this link up on my site at the end of the show. I’ll also put up the one on the Mega Cities
to show you just how ALREADY there are hundreds of NGOs, non-governmental organizations
working with your governments, and have been for a while, getting paid by your government
and the foundations to set up this system through academia and various other sources. It’s all
across Europe as well because it’s a WORLD organization. It’s from the United Nations who first
mentioned the cramming in of all the people into the center, downtown areas. They will be
building up the way until you have the shacks on top like they did in Hong Kong at one time.
They literally had shacks on top of the skyscrapers for those at the bottom of the heap, only it
was a reversal, you were at the top of the heap there.
Now, the EU, it’s interesting. I read an article recently where Hillary Clinton was addressing
NATO and popping over to see her friend Madeline Albright, also as an adviser there. The
woman who loves people and starves them to death like she did with Iraq and thought it was a
good thing. Hillary mentioned that part of NATO’s job and this is true because I read from the
book by one of the generals from NATO who wrote a book quite a few years back about, one of
its functions was to INTEGRATE, totally integrate, COMPLETELY integrate Europe until it’s like
ONE country. That’s been done, of course. Hillary reiterated that in her late speech that that
was part, still a part of its ongoing function. Just when you think you’re integrated, no, you’ve
got MORE integration to go and more and more and more until it’s just a mass of heaving
peoples moving to and fro and most of them living not too well at all. This is from the BBC. It’s
about the Economic Union President that was elected by, again, a very SECRETIVE COUNCIL that
elects the President for this massive new Soviet bloc called the Economic Union. I’ll read this
tirade that was put against this President in front of his face, after I come back from this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. This article is from the BBC to
do with a tirade from a Member of the European Parliament towards the new President that no
one had actually heard of before. So who elected him, no one really knows.
UK MEP attacks new EU president
BBCNews.com / Wednesday, 24 February 2010
A British Eurosceptic (A: I like Euro-septic because it sounds nice and smelly.) MEP has
unleashed a volley of insults against the President of the European Council.
Nigel Farage, who leads UK Independence Party (UKIP) MEPS in the European
parliament, said Herman Van Rompuy had "the charisma of a damp rag".
He compared the former Belgian prime minister to a "low-grade bank clerk" and said he
came from a "non-country".
The attack, which stunned the chamber, came as Mr Van Rompuy made his maiden
appearance in parliament in Brussels.
"I don't want to be rude," Mr Farage began, before launching into a personal attack lasting
several minutes.
"Who are you? I'd never heard of you, nobody in Europe had ever heard of you," Mr
Farage thundered, as noisy disapproval at his intervention in the chamber rose.
"Oh, I know democracy is not popular with you lot," he said, addressing the members of
parliament as they voiced their surprise. (A: And that’s true. That’s true. Everything is
done in secret; this great Soviet bloc they call the European Union and the laws are all
passed from the top. The Members of the European Parliament can SUGGEST laws and
they can suggest not putting the laws through but they have no power to block them,
everything is in total secrecy… but that’s socialism for you.)
Mr Farage - known for his outspoken interventions - did, however, admit that he thought
Mr Van Rompuy was "competent and capable", adding that this made him
"dangerous". (A: Because he means capable for what? It’s socialism.)
"I have no doubt that your intention is to be the quiet assassin of European democracy and
of European nation states," he said. (A: That’s also true because the European Union is
not democratic by ANY definition whatsoever. In fact, some of the dissidents from the old
Soviet bloc have written screeds about this and said it’s really very much like the Soviet
Union.)
Mr Farage's party, UKIP, campaigns for the withdrawal of Britain from the European
Union. It has 13 representatives in the European parliament.
"You seem to have a loathing for the very concept of the existence of nation states," Mr
Farage continued, adding: "Perhaps that's because you come from Belgium, which is pretty
much a non-country."
Mr Van Rompuy, 62, was chosen unanimously by the governments of the EU's 27
member states to take on the role of the first permanent European Council president. (A:
In other words, it was the governments. This is what we are told, the governments chose
this guy. The public didn’t get a vote on anything. This is the top guy to rule over all of
them.)
Described as camera-shy and sometimes given the nickname the "grey mouse", he is seen
as a coalition builder, credited for steering linguistically divided Belgium out of crisis.
In a typically low-key response to the comments, Mr Van Rompuy said: "There was one
contribution that I can only hold in contempt, but I'm not going to comment further."
You see, he can’t deny it because his sole purpose, and that’s why he really was picked by a
much higher authority than any leaders of the governments. He was picked because he
is THEIR boy. He will do exactly as he is told. Socialism is going hard and fast. In fact, Europe is
gone to be honest with you. It’s pretty well gone. You can’t unravel it. I can remember when
Bob Rae was put in as the Premier of Canada. Everybody was so fed up with the left and the
right wings, they voted in the far left. This guy is further left than Karl Marx. Bob Rae shook up
a lot of things. He left us with a massive debt in Ontario; we didn’t have any when he came in.
He said that by the time he finished with Ontario, he and his party, the laws, interwoven laws
that he put in would be IMPOSSIBLE TO UNRAVEL. Well, that’s exactly how they set up the
European Union. In other words they are trying to tell us if we went through trying to unravel
these laws legally it would take about 50 years to do so. Well, personally I know how you do it.
You just get all that stuff and you throw it in… I’ve got a nice fire here; it’s quite nice and as big,
this stove here. It holds quite a bit and it would burn them all pretty efficiently too because
when it’s really hot you don’t see any smoke coming out. But that’s the reality of life we are
living in. It’s a planned farce and has been for quite a few generations and the public are the
last, it’s designed that the public are the last to know what it’s really all about.
Another laugh I got too, was the World Heath Organization, this great Dr WHO. From all the
farces they’ve gone through, remember everything from the United Nations is a POLITICAL
agency and every agency they have is for A POLITICAL PURPOSE IN THE BIG SOCIALIST PLAN.
We’ve seen the farces they’ve had with the IPCC that they commandeered and all the other
organizations that end up with scandals and scams. Here they’ve come out with…
A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a
Global Population
Previous Volume 360:491-499 January 29, 2009 Number 5 / NEJM.org
I don’t know if you know it or not, your health services are all being amalgamated. That’s part
of the globalist plan. You will have ONE authority over all medicine and medical authorities and
everything comes down from the United Nations. Actually it already does go through the
World Health Organization, but they are putting in a Surgical Safety Checklist for SURGEONS
and for the staff and it’s the most basic stuff that I don’t even… I think even the nursing
assistants probably get taught this stuff. They have to retell them again to count the swabs,
make sure they are all out of the body, make sure that they have right patient and don’t
remove the wrong breast. Back after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning this World
Health Organization list they put out. This article is actually from the New England Journal of
Medicine. I’ll put this up for your perusal too and another one next to it, to do with Canada’s
safety checklist. We are so goody-two-shoes in Canada we’ve already implemented this to
make sure the people go through this 32-point list and it’s to mandatory on April 1 st. It says…
[Alan laughing]. You’ve got to laugh at Canada too.
New safety checklist designed to prevent surgical errors
By Dave Waddell, The Windsor Star, February 24, 2010
The surgical safety checklist that was rolled out this week by the Ontario Ministry of
Health (A: Which they don’t mention is from the World Health Organization.) is designed
to prevent precisely the kind of mistakes that saw Dr. Barbara Heartwell perform two
unnecessary mastectomies on a pair of local women, health officials said Wednesday. (A:
And that is called, in medical parlance, oops. Someone else also, I do believe, removed a
baby’s bladder by mistake. That’s an awful thing. You could see it in a comedy show and
you would laugh your head off but in reality… this is real. They’re actually doing this
kind of stuff.)
I can’t understand how it’s happening at all. I really, really can’t. I really, really, really can’t.
Either the training has gone down the tubes to such an extent that you’ve got total
incompetents in charge but I think part of it too, again, is the socialist system that runs the
whole thing here. There are more chiefs than Indians. There are more bureaucrats running
over these things than well-trained employees and that’s part of the problem. That’s also the
same I think with Britain and other countries in Europe. The US is taking Britain for the example
to follow under Obama’s health care plan. DON’T YOU BELIEVE FOR A SECOND THAT IT’S BEEN
SHELVED OR THEY ARE STILL DEBATING because I talk to enough medical professional in the US,
frequently, who give me the scoop on what’s BEING implemented already, what was being
implemented before Obama was brought in even, and where it is all going now. There are a lot
of wards getting shut down. There are a lot of them that are getting rented out to private
organizations. Right along with the plan that Obama had suggested, from the RAND
Corporation of course, they are really cutting an awful lot of the care OUT all together.
I’ll put all these links up for you to peruse at the end of the show
on cuttingthroughthematrix.com if XplorNet, that wonderful Hughes Satellite Company that
gives it out to a few companies like XplorNet, GIVES ME or DEEMS to give me the speed that I
need to get everything uploaded tonight, since I’m down to twice the speed of dial-up and I’m
paying 3 times of what most of you are paying out there for your cable or high speed internet.
Because I’m me, I guess. They just like me so much.
There is a caller on the line. I don’t know if its long distance but it’s from London. Is it Honey
that is there?
Honey: Thank you for taking my call. I’ve only been listening to your show for a few months
but you are doing a good work and you are waking people up. I just wanted to, it’s good you
spend so much time talking about the EU and that’s what my little comment is about. A few
weeks ago, when they were talking about Greece and the economy in the news, whether they
were going to help them or not. Someone was being interviewed and I think he was based
inside the European Parliament and behind him, on one of these sort of LCD screens, was the
flag of the EU. There is the blue background and the circle of the 12 golden stars. Above the
circle and underneath it were these 2 yellow semi circles. Basically, to me, it looks like an eye.
I’ve never seen that symbol before and when I saw that I got quite disturbed by it. I tried
finding that clip on the internet, you know a lot of them upload these into the internet, but I
couldn’t find it anywhere. I’m just having a look on the EU web site now and it turns out that
it’s a symbol of one of their sort of… one of their bodies. It’s a symbol of the Council. It’s
something that I never saw before and it really, it just freaked me out and I wanted to call you
about it and I haven’t had a chance to do so until now. It’s also interesting because when I was
at school we were taught that the 12 stars are meant to symbolize the first 12 nations that
signed onto the EU.
Alan: That’s what they told them.
Honey: But if you actually go on their own web site… Can I read something out? I’m on the
web site now and it says, “The number of stars have nothing to do with the number of member
states. There are 12 stars because the number 12 is traditionally the symbol of perfection,
completeness and unity. The flag therefore remains unchanged regardless of EU
enlargements.”
Alan: That’s right.
Honey: I know that you’ve mentioned in the past the UN actually means ‘one’ in French. Does
the EU have something to do with ‘eye’ in other European languages? Does it mean ‘eye?’
Alan: It’s from an old Greek rendition and then into… it stayed in Greek actually. The precursor
of dawn was also called ‘eua’ or often they will say ‘io’ and in the modern times but it used to
be pronounced ‘eu.’ There is always someone who heralds the dawn, the new age, the new
time. That’s why John the Baptist was put in; he is the heralder for a new system. That’s why in
Freemasonry says that he is the heralder. That’s why they have Saint John’s lodges and all the
rest of it. It’s the same thing here. There is always one who heralds the dawn coming in and
really that’s what that’s stands for. They will often now say ‘io’ but it’s ‘eu.’
Honey: When that person was being interviewed, that eye in the background was the first
thing that jumped out at me. I suppose I guess, once you’ve been listening to shows like yours,
it changes your thinking. I was just thinking, other people that are watching the same interview
at home, surely they are seeing this but, I guess obviously that they are not.
Alan: They don’t really. It’s the same with the American flag. Often you will see it with the
gold fringe around it, which is really maritime law, because things are run by maritime law
when it’s got a gold fringe round about it. But they don’t ask questions. They really believe the
media will tell them everything that is important and of course the media’s job is not to tell you
anything that’s important. What’s interesting too about the European Union one is if you look
at the original American, the US war of independence flag, it did not have the lines of stars; it
had a circle of stars in it on a blue background. Exactly the same. Benjamin Franklin explained
that. He said, I HOPE THIS WILL BE A CONFEDERATION FOR A CONFEDERATION OF THE WORLD because the
purpose of the 12 is for a guiding council, to run behind the scenes, of wise men and 12 WISE
MEN, he says, WILL RULE THE WORLD. And that’s what it’s always meant in Cabalism, in esoteric
Cabalism. It’s not the Parliament as you know and even the ones at the top tell you that all the
decisions are done by secret panels at the top. Well, there is obviously a TOP secret panel and
it will be 12 wise men.
Honey: It’s not every day that you get political organizations talking about perfect numbers and
things like that and on their web site.
Alan: Exactly. Where is this in the… You only find this in Cabalism and that’s where it really
comes from.
Honey: Thank you for taking my call.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
You’ll find in the Rosicrucian movement they used that number and that figure too and
Rosicrucianism also had, it wasn’t just a Jewish Cabalism, they borrowed a lot of the Jewish
concepts and brought it in. They actually called it Christian Cabalism at the time and that
became one of their high symbols, the 12 stars. Of course, they always say there are 12 chairs
laid out with an extra one that is not occupied so technically there are 13 chairs, 12 bodies, but
one to come. That’s what they say. The eye is interesting; it’s always the same con job that’s
going on. That means from even above the panels there is another body or person watching
over it all. Some of them will say, OH IT’S THE GRAND ARCHITECT OF THE UNIVERSE and all that stuff but
it’s much bigger than just that. They definitely have single bosses here and there looking over
individual organizations.
It’s interesting, this article, to do with just how addicted people are today to their toys, that
they were given. They are made very, very cheap, all the toys. The internet is cheap for most
folk; even if you don’t have much money at all you can get a cheap, used computer and get a
cheap deal… unless you live in the country like I do and you have to get satellite. They have
their phones and all the rest of it. I’ve read articles before where they were already doing
studies through academia and getting all the information given to them by the authorities of
your phone calls, where you are, when you do it, to find out PATTERNS all about YOU and how
it is fed to the Pentagon. I read the article FROM the Pentagon where they actually have a
virtual reality world set up where there is one of EACH OF US in that… an avatar, if you like, in
each one of these, from all countries, IN the Pentagon setup. The idea being, that by getting all
of your daily data and information on where you travel with your cell phone – because they are
tracking you all the time – getting your cluster of friends – they call them clusters – what you
have in common with people, they fix out your personality profile and they can actually feed
into it what you would do under certain circumstances, knowing your personality profile, and so
you are UTTERLY PREDICTABLE. This article is just another one on the same kind of thing.
Struck in a rut?
That might be because our movements are 90% predictable
By Fiona Macrae / Daily Mail / 25th February 2010
Like to think of yourself as a spontaneous sort? You are so predictable.
We are such creatures of habit that scientists can accurately predict where we'll go and
when we'll go there more than 90 per cent of the time.
Most of us can usually be found within one to three miles of our home.
Even those with a long commute generally do the same things at around the same time
each day, the journal Science reports.
In other words, most of us are stuck in a rut.
Researcher Albert-Laszlo Barbasi said: 'If you drive for one and a half hours to work and
back, three hours of your day are taken away so you have little freedom to be spontaneous.
'You are working, and travelling home and pretty much crashing and preparing for the next
day.'
Globetrotters also follow a well-trodden path, tending to follow familiar routes, rather than
visiting new places.
Professor Barbasi, of the respected Harvard Medical School in the U.S., analysed three
months of mobile phone data from 50,000 people.
Logged by billing companies when they made or received calls and text, it allowed the
researchers to pinpoint their location to within two miles.
The researchers used this information to build up a pattern of each person's movements
during the week and at weekends.
They found they could predict where a person would be at given time and get it right
up to 93 per cent of the time.
Even the most spontaneous sorts were 80 per cent predictable.
Professor Barbasi said: 'We are far more predictable than we actually think.
'You have a regular schedule but think there are people out there who are less regular and
are very spontaneous.
'What we are finding is there aren't those spontaneous people out there. Each of us
are very regular and that regularity makes us very predictable.
I’ve told you before that in a totalitarian system EVERYONE must be completely predictable. In
every totalitarian society – that have always been socialist by the way – under the names of
Soviet or Nazi – Nazi was national socialism; communism or Sovietization was supposed to be
international socialism – they had records on EVERY SINGLE INDIVIDUAL and all their habits and
incredible amounts of data BEFORE they even had computers. So here they are going at it and
this is only one professor getting this information shared to him that is supposed to be kept
private and all the rest of it. He’s doing this data and I guarantee you this stuff will be going to
the Pentagon too, from that previous article I read a few months ago, or maybe it was last
summer even. Just to let you know that that’s the kind of world we are growing up into. Most
folk don’t care because a lot of people WILL like socialism. They can be trained into liking Big
Brother and believing that he is there to help them. A lot of folk will actually like that, believe it
or not.
This article, “Will dummies buy the fed’s “smart meter” line?” – they are putting these smart
meters in your electrical supply on your house all over Canada and a lot of places in the
States. In Canada we don’t get the option; they just come and put it in. These meters have
2 methods it said, in a little brochure that is slipped under your door, to transmit the
readings to their head office, once it’s up and running. They said that one is by, basically, FM
radio and the other one is by a Wi-Fi system that connects somehow to the internet. So
here is another spy thing in your house but not only that, they can actually read the
signatures on any appliance you use in your house. When you buy any new items you can
plug them in and it will automatically register that and send that back to them too. And if
you go over a certain amount of usage you eventually will be penalized for doing so, as they
bring in what they call ‘the age of austerity.’
The age of austerity, the cutbacks, training the animals to have less and less and less and the
wonderful equality. That’s what they mean by equality in socialism, we are all dirt, equally poor
at the bottom – that’s most of us – and you have the small elite at the top running the whole
system, as I’ve explained many, many times before. Under the austerity, if you read the articles
in the papers today, do a search, you’ll find that Greece is going through riots right now
because their President or Prime Minister just declared he’s bringing in austerity and massive
clamp-downs to pay off the national debt. Really he was ordered to do so by the Economic
Union because you are no longer a sovereign nation anymore. In fact, you have less rights than
a US state has to the federal government. You are more like a province of Britain basically and
you do what you are told. So it says…
Privacy alert: Will dummies buy the fed’s “smart meter” line?
2010 February 25 / blastmagazine.com
The word “privacy” appears not once, in a 1,500-word request for public comment on the
smart grid, released by the White House this week.
That’s because your individual privacy is the obstacle that the government, aided by
the utility companies, hopes to overcome with so-called smart meters — devices that
will reveal precisely how you are using the electricity you paid for.
Research into the smart grid, which includes the use of smart meters, has been paid for by
hundreds of millions of your tax dollars. (A: That’s a fact. Our tax money FUNDS our
chains. I keep telling you this. WE FUND OUR OWN CHAINS. Isn’t that amazing? We
pay for all the research and development and the set-up of it and then they make us pay for
it when they install it.)
So far, the only discernible benefits of the smart meters will go to the utility companies and
government investigators. (No potential savings for consumers have been
demonstrated.) (A: Your bills don’t go down.)
One question from the Office of Science and Technology does glance on the privacy issue:
“Who owns the home energy usage data? Should individual consumers and their
authorized third-party service providers have the right to access energy usage data directly
from the meter?”
Obviously, individual consumers own the juice they pay for, not the utilities. (A: Well
that’s going to be obvious but it ain’t the facts. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and before leaving the smart
meters, I should mention too that here in Canada they’ve been putting them in for a long time
and they still haven’t set up the grid, they tell us. How they’ve been doing it before that even,
was that they stopped sending it out to you because they privatized it. The taxpayer funded
and built up the whole electrical system for Ontario and then they sold it for peanuts. Actually,
Maurice Strong set it up, from the United Nations. He was the guy they sent over to sell it off,
to his private buddies, and then they cut back on even meter readers.
So they give you an estimate of what they think it should be, according to last year or whatever,
and believe you me, when they make a mistake it doesn’t matter how many times you phone
them up, as I do every week, they go by that original mistake. These people you talk to are like
computers themselves. You get overbilled by some times $300-400 in a bill and that can take
up to 4 months to clear up with them, maybe 5 if you stick at it. I went through it last year,
then they put in the smart meter. The girl who read the last meter, they actually sent her out
to read it when they were installing the new one. She couldn’t read it because the bowl was all
full of condensation so she guessed at it and I’m supposed to just pay up her big mistake, which
is out by hundreds of bucks. So this is tacked on to every bill they give me ever since and even
yet I’m still phoning in what the new meter says because they haven’t sent out someone to
read it and they haven’t set up the system to read it remotely… so they tell me. That’s your con
with smart meters but it will be a form of making you austere, teaching you and training you
Pavlovian style by cutting you off, if necessary, according to how many people are in the house
as to how much electricity you should be using. They will just cut you off and penalize you if
you go above it. That’s what’s coming down. I read the early articles on it a few years back.
Freedom is a wonderful thing and I’m still looking to find someone who’s got it. I’ve read a lot
about it and I’ve read a lot about people fighting for freedom but I truly haven’t met many
people who’ve got it. Maybe in a few jungles here and there where folk make sure, like they
are in some parts of the Amazon, they don’t let the people IN to spoil their country. Maybe
they have freedom but if they do, they are the last.
We prattle on about it a lot because we are taught by the governments that we are free. I’ve
read that quote often by Huxley and Russell and others who said WE WILL ALL BELIEVE WE ARE FREE
BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT WILL TELL US SO . That’s really the freedom that we have today as we are
trained, Pavlovian style, into this new socialist system that’s got a fair ways to go and it’s not
pleasant whatsoever. IT’S A GLOBAL PLANTATION, basically. Depopulation will come in to it as
they claim there are less resources. It doesn’t matter if there are less resources, the fact is,
they are allowing less resources to be used and given to us. That will eventually come to your
food as well. Rationing will come down the pike. They’ve got to bring that in, they always do in
a wartime scenario and this is a WAR ON THE PUBLIC they declared a long time ago by the
Fabians and the Royal Society and the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on
Foreign Relations to basically train the public into the way we SHOULD live, according to the
EXPERTS, those that know better, but don’t want to live like you. SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN
OTHERS IN SUCH UTOPIAS, said Orwell.
I was going to read an article about a poor old woman of 61 who got arrested for standing and
talking about arranging her funeral by a cop in Atlanta but I’ll leave that until tomorrow. From
Hamish and myself from a VERY cold Canada – amongst all this global warming and there is a
cold north wind blowing – it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Detroit to be Shrunk
WHO Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population
Smart Meters
I’ve talked so much about this whole new system we are coming in to. We are actually IN it,
well into it in fact. A system devised a long time ago which used the dialectical process of left,
right and enemies to bring in a world system. I’ve mentioned so many times and I’ve lost count
of, Professor Carroll Quigley who talked about those BEHIND the big plan to bring in a world
system, a controlled society, planned society with a reduced population to serve the future
scientific society. He called it the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign
Relations. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning how Professor
Carroll Quigley in his own two books, Tragedy and Hopeand the Anglo-American
Establishment, laid out the big plan for the world and even trading blocs. He mentioned the
groups that worked incessantly from the end of the 1800s in fact, through different names until
they amalgamated into the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations
and how they had been behind ALL of the major wars, and the little wars too, since the late
1800s, all to achieve a goal of a planned society.
This ties right in with Mr Rockefeller’s statements where he said that HE MUCH PREFERRED A WORLD
RUN BY INTELLECTUALS AND BANKERS TO THAT RUN BY, BASICALLY, AUTO, SELF-DETERMINATION BY NATIONS
THEMSELVES. That’s really what they decided back in the 1800s in fact; same thing, a planned
society as I’ve said, depopulation. This was all the rage back then and into the early 1900s. HG
Wells, who was a propagandist for them via the Fabian Society and eventually the Royal
Institute of International Affairs, wrote about this planned society. He wrote about it in his
non-fiction works as well as his fictional works. People should read his non-fiction. He’s far
more blatant about his eugenical racism, you might call it, because it’s CLASS RACISM in a
sense, of what he believed was superior types verses inferior types. This was reiterated in the
book by Charles Galton Darwin in the 1950s, a descendant of Charles Darwin. He was a
physicist, this man, and he said in The Next Million Years that THEY’D HAVE TO REALLY ELIMINATE THE
MASSES OF USELESS EATERS, basically, OTHERWISE THEY WOULD OUTBREED THE SUPERIOR TYPES WHO MUST GO
ON INTO THE BRAVE NEW WORLD FUTURE THAT WAS PLANNED. This is still going on today.
It’s the same agenda really, as the world emerges from what they thought was a Cold War of
right wing, left wing, into the amalgamation of the two. We find the United Nations has taken
on the role, completely, that the old Soviet Union used to do. Everything that the United
Nations does is PURELY POLITICAL IN ITS AGENDA, purely political. They have massive umbrella
groups of non-governmental organizations, the same thing as the old Soviet system which was
‘rule by council.’ That’s what ‘Soviet’ meant, unelected councils, all these NGOs, all funded by
the big foundations which are, again, funded by the biggest industrials on the planet and the
international banking system.
Those who initially funded the Cecil Rhodes Foundation and then the Lord Milner Group, in fact
all those comprising the Lord Milner Group that became the Royal Institute of International
Affairs were all top world bankers. That’s the group that Rockefeller was referring to when he
said that, BETTER TO LET THE INTELLIGENTSIA AND BANKERS RULE THE WORLD THAN TO LEAVE NATIONS TO THEIR
AUTO, SELF-DETERMINATION. During the Reece Commission - I’ve mentioned it many times -
Senator Normal Dodd went round the big foundations to ask them, on behalf of Congress, as to
why they were funding what appeared to be communist front groups. He was told, blatantly,
and you can find this in a book called Foundations: Their Power and Influence. He was told
that their job was to alter so drastically and radically the culture and the systems of the
Western world that THEY WOULD EVENTUALLY BLEND SEAMLESSLY WITH THAT OF THE SOVIET UNION . In
other words, it was known all that time ago, back in the 50s, that the two systems would come
together into a synthesis. That’s exactly what has happened.
The communist system was very important to bring that about because you’ve got to
understand how they took down societies in the West through many left wing groups, NOT
really to bring groups to the top for power; if they got power at all it was transient. It was to
destroy the OLD system and to destroy the idealism of patriotism to a country and the things
that YOU were taught that it stood for. Then they brought in a whole bunch of FAKE beliefs to
do with equality of all kinds. They were not talking about the equality of different peoples; they
were talking about putting everybody DOWN to the same basic level under the same system of
the Soviet Union. There were no special rights groups within the Soviet Union, although they
were used in the West by them.
One thing that’s never mentioned is that PSYCHIATRY shot to the top as the Soviet Union was
getting to the top and gaining power. It was also a major power behind the Nazi belief. It was
also a major organization in the Fabian Society because psychiatry was founded on the basis of
people being born with hereditary complexes. They had various names for it but they all
thought that everything that happened in life was hereditary. Intelligence, behavior, all mental
illnesses, as they claimed, criminology, all these things were hereditary. They really started off
as a mixture of genetics in their belief system, hereditary diseases, and they also believed the
only way to eliminate the ‘unfit’, as they called them, was to literally do just that… eliminate
them completely.
There was a very good documentary put out by, of all people, the Scientologists who did it
because they are in a sort of competition with psychiatry. It’s one of the best exposés of the
psychiatric beginnings. You’ll see the top people in psychiatry in Britain, Germany and
elsewhere talking about racial hygiene, racial purity, and all that kind of stuff. They have clips
from the organizations within the Nazi system. They even show you clips in children’s school. It
also shows you the farce of psychiatry as they try to validate themselves as an actual science,
which is quite funny at times.
Psychiatry is based on the idea that mental illnesses can be not cured; they will admit that.
They can’t cure them; they will say that they ‘treat’ them. In reality, psychiatry is a hit and miss
thing. It’s a whole bunch of theories, none of which can actually be proven. They’ve jumped at
so many different things: it’s a chemical imbalance, which is a theory ONLY among some of
them. Other ones think it’s genetic and it goes on and on and on forever and you never get to
the bottom of anything. There is an article to do with psychiatry in the Mail Online.
Psychiatrists want to call being angry a mental illness. How utterly mad!
By Jerome Burne / 15th February 2010 / Mail Online
(Alan: Getting back to what I’m saying, in the Nazi era you’d be surprised that
almost THE WHOLE OF THE PSYCHIATRIC PROFESSION BECAME NAZIS. They
believed in it. They believed in superior types. This article is to tie in how they are
getting power, right now, and they have been for a long time and doing the same thing
across the Western countries.)
Do you live surrounded by clutter - ancient copies of magazines, your children’s old toys,
articles you’ve clipped out of newspapers over the years?
If you find it hard to throw out things of limited or no value, you could be suffering from
hoarding disorder. (A: They have their own book, it’s called The Diagnostic And
Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders and they ADD to it every year so many NEW
disorders that there is hardly anything left of human behavior that’s not in there. They
want the right to treat everybody, through themselves and the social services.)
‘Hoarding’ is just one of the new mental conditions being added to the psychiatrists’
bible, or the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM), to give it its
proper name.
Other new conditions identified as possibly needing professional help include binge
eating - which is said to affect many people who are seriously obese - and‘cognitive
tempo disorder’, which seems very like laziness (symptoms include dreaminess and
sluggishness).
There’s also ‘intermittent explosive disorder’, which involves occasionally becoming
very angry suddenly. (A: I guess most of the police have that when they start beating
people up on the road and don’t know they are being photographed.)
Most bizarre of the proposed additions is one defined as (A: Listen to this one, because
THINK about what I’m saying here…) ‘getting a thrill at being outraged by
pornography’. (A: See how they changed EVERYTHING upside down? Everything that
held society together is now under complete attack as ABNORMAL. This is being done
under the guise of a profession. It’s a profession with a political and power purpose.
Quite something really.)
It was also described as Whitehouse syndrome after the campaigner Mary Whitehouse,
who objected to sexual content on TV.
The DSM is a large book that lists all psychiatric disorders and describes their symptoms.
If a condition is in there, it means it’s considered a mental illness. (A: They even have
restless leg syndrome. You know how you sit there as children – I’ve done it; I sometimes
do it yet – and one leg starts to go as you rest on the ball of your foot and you start to
shake it. It feels actually pretty good; you are getting rid of energy, especially when
you’ve been sitting for a while. That’s now a mental illness.)
But some of the new entries are controversial, not least because of fears they will result in
many more people being put on drugs (A: That’s exactly what they want to do.) that
could be ineffective or dangerous.
The DSM is produced by the American Psychiatric Association and is hugely influential
worldwide. (A: I should mention again that psychiatric documentary put out by
Scientology even though, as I say, Scientology wants to get in the business of taking over
with alternate medicines or treatments in the so-called mental illness area. They did an
EXCELLENT job on showing you the power structures within psychiatry and showed you
how they tried to define even attention deficit disorder and they couldn’t at their own
meetings. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and before I go on with this
article, Psychiatry: An Industry of Death – up on Google Video – is the Scientology exposé of
the psychiatric industry. It gives the history of it too. It’s quite fascinating; disgusting at the
same time as the so called SCIENCE pretty well had techniques of CURING people going back to
the 1800s and early 1900s including trying to drown them. That was considered a science at
one time. Now they’ve got big pharma behind them and just heavily sedate people. A very
good exposé. Also, before I go on too, I’ll mention that there is a site called PsychRights.org. I’ll
put all these things on my site at the end of the show and you can look them up for yourself.
Psych Rights goes through a lot of the abuses of the psychiatric and pharma industry. There is a
lot of compiled data there on the reality behind it all and the drugs they use and the BUSINESS
that they run. So it’s well worth looking into. Getting back to this article…
But not everybody is so relaxed about including new disorders. In fact, every time the
DSM gets updated there is a big row about what should be added and what shouldn’t. This
time is no exception.
There have been three versions of the DSM since the first in 1952 and with each edition it
has grown fatter. - DSM-IV is seven times larger than the original. Last week, a draft of
DSM-V - due to be published in 2013 - was put on the web and is already proving
contentious.
By the way, most of them who sit on the board who decide what’s now an illness all are getting
paid directly, in fact ALL of them are getting paid directly by the big pharma industries. They
get salaries from them and they go under the guise of being a science. Remember too, the
power that governments can put to use, of this particular science over the public… which is
happening. Remember too, that Julian and Aldous Huxley talked about the future and they
certainly would be drugging the populations to make them more compliant along with massive
indoctrination through various media and entertainment. That’s happened as well. We are
here. We are there actually. I remember too, years ago getting a lecture from a top
psychiatrist who, in front of the class, started cursing and swearing and using, it was all sexual
terminology too, and everyone was shocked. He just came out with this tirade. Then he
pointed to, there was so many in the class who had blushed and he said that YOU PEOPLE ARE ALL
INHIBITED, he said, THAT’S WHY YOU BLUSHED. He said, NO WORD, NO ACTION SHOULD MAKE YOU
EMBARRASSED. That’s the philosophy that these creeps and weirdoes and, yes, DEVIANTS are
preaching throughout society. That’s the norm today.
Deviancy, I was talking about that yesterday too. This is a sort of continuation from yesterday’s
talk because HOW FAR DOES IT ALL GO? Well, the sky is the limit when nothing is taboo. It’s
interesting too, when you listen to some of the articles or documentaries put out by the ex-KGB
spies who defected like Bezmenov and different people. I’ve got the links up on my web site
from that particular man who went through the stages of how they would DESTABILIZE THE WEST,
PARTLY THROUGH THE DESTRUCTION OF THE IDEALISM OF YOUR CULTURE. That included all the things that
hold your culture together like man, woman, family, and all that kind of stuff. Eventually, you
have conflict within personalities and groups.
That’s the weaponization of conflict between peoples. They used all the different factions and
groups AND the extreme feminist rights and all that to encourage all this stuff to come to the
top and destroy all that was. That has happened as well. At the same time, just like that
psychiatrist said many years ago, nothing is taboo. Of course Julian Huxley himself said they
would encourage PRE-pubertal sex so that the children would never mate with a partner for life
and that way they would not produce offspring. However, he said that CONTRACEPTION WOULD BE
MADE AVAILABLE AND SO WOULD ABORTION, SO THEY COULD BASICALLY HAVE FAR MORE SEXUAL ACTIVITY THAN
BEFORE AS LONG AS THEY DIDN’T HAVE OFFSPRING . That was okay. PLUS THEY WOULDN’T BOND WHICH
MEANT THEY WOULD NEVER STAND UP AGAINST THE TYRANNY OF GOVERNMENT OR UNFAIRNESS OF ANY KIND.
You don’t do that when you are on your own. That’s what George Orwell showed you in 1984.
When you are just a number, you have no friends, you have no partner and no family to fight
for, you just cower when Big Brother turns his eyes on you.
Here is an article from the Globe and Mail, which is from Canada. It’s about teachers that are
doing lap dances now for children in schools, if you want to know. I’ll put his up on my site too.
It’s actually got a video of what these two teachers performed for the children. One of the
children had a cell phone there and he filmed them doing this. If you are really kinky you can
actually watch the video. I haven’t because I’m not that desperate and I can’t get the speed
anyway because of XplorNet to watch anything movie wise. That’s why I appreciate when
anyone has got a video to send me and so on, DO SO. Send me videos. I cannot get to the links
and look at things because I’m cut back and cut back and getting penalized by deliberation and
political reasons obviously. It says…
Teachers' lap dance 'a little too far' for students
By Sarah Boesveld / February 23, 2010 / From Wednesday's Globe and Mail
The kids are calling it "Two Teachers, One Chair," and it has all the makings of a
YouTube hit.
But school administrators and parents are hard pressed to find humour in a graphic lap
dance caught on video between two teachers at a spirit rally (A: SPIRIT RALLY… isn’t
that wonderful, this new religion and all that WE’RE ALL ONE stuff?) at Churchill High
School in Winnipeg last week.
The two teachers, one of whom was identified by students as phys-ed instructor Chrystie
Fitchner, have been sent home without pay after the spirit dance before100 students as
young as 13 years old. The identity of the male teacher could not be confirmed. Efforts to
reach Ms. Fitchner Tuesday night were unsuccessful. (A: Back with more after this
break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article of just how
far it’s going, maybe even further than we know. This is only something that broke into the
news media. A lot of stuff is covered up too because powers-that-be within school systems
defend themselves before they’ll tell the truth, like every other organization. It says here…
The two teachers, one of whom was identified by students as phys-ed instructor Chrystie
Fitchner, have been sent home without pay after the spirit dance (A: Spirit dance, that
must be scotch and vodka or something.) before 100 students as young as 13 years old.
The identity of the male teacher could not be confirmed. (A: They will know who exactly
who it is but he must be better connected.) Efforts to reach Ms. Fitchner Tuesday night
were unsuccessful.
The whole routine has since been distributed on the Internet, thanks to the footage captured
on a student's cellphone camera. The Winnipeg School Division is investigating. (A:
You’d better believe there is a lot of covering up going on there because this won’t be the
first time.)
Fourteen-year-old Saigha Vincent was filming the teacher dance-off at the Gym Riot spirit
assembly last Wednesday for Grade 9 to 12 students at the Winnipeg high school.
The routine began with the female teacher, sporting pigtails, seated on a chair, her legs
spread, hips gyrating. Bumping beats played in the background and the male teacher
approached between her legs, his hips swiveling to the beat. (A: Pachauri would love
this; it’s like something that he would write. You know, the guy at the head of the IPCC
that writes the porno novels and wants us to take him seriously.)
Less than five seconds into the routine, the Grade 9 student and her friends went from
giggling to staring at their sometimes very strict instructors in disbelief.
"At first we were laughing and then it was like 'Oh that's a little too far.'" (A: CHILDREN
know that before they start getting into the porno stuff that is blasted at them and start
copying it.)
But it went even further.
The female teacher threw her head back and thrust her one leg out as the male teacher
continued to dance over her. There was butt-slapping and further gyration. Then the man
dipped his head down between her legs and simulated oral sex. (A: That’s what your
children are getting in school now and it’s not just happening there, I’ll bet you anything.
Quite something isn’t it? But then again, it doesn’t shock me at all. I saw all this coming
years ago because I understand the agenda since I’ve studied it.)
Now, part of the agenda too was to take down societies by ECONOMIC warfare. Part of it was
to do mass immigration to already overburdened countries and bring down their system of care
for themselves that they paid into. Countries like Britain, most of the housing over there really
was Council Housing paid for through the taxes of the public into building houses for
themselves that they then rented generation after generation. You go on a list there when you
get married – at least they used to get married – and you would wait maybe 4 or 5 years,
maybe longer, before you could eventually get into one of these houses. The EU that is now
this Super Parliament tells each country what to do, who to bring in and who to give houses to.
This is to further aggravate the tension, the building up of tension between peoples and further
destroy any idealism that you have to do with your country. You feel apathetic. THAT’S A VERY
IMPORTANT THING TO DESTROY NATIONS, IS APATHY. Remember, Huxley said that himself
and so did Bertrand Russell, a big player in the designing of this system, APATHY WAS ESSENTIAL
TO THIS SYSTEM. This article here is from the Mail Online.
Somali mother of four has no right to live here... (A: She’s an illegal alien.)
but we have to give her a council house
By Arthur Martin and Steve Doughty / 24th February 2010 / Mail Online
Standing proudly with her arm draped over her 36in television, this is the Somali woman
who must be given a council house even though she has no right to live in Britain.
Nimco Hassan Ibrahim - who lives with her four children on benefit handouts (A: That’s
welfare.) - was granted the right to the home by EU judges (A: Not the British judges, but
the EU judges in Brussels.) yesterday because she was once married to a Danish citizen
who briefly worked in this country.
The landmark judgment means the 34-year-old migrant and her children will soon be
packing up their impressive collection of furniture and electrical equipment when they are
given a new house.
Although Miss Ibrahim claims her income support payments were suspended during the
legal action, she has somehow bought a Playstation 3 games console, computer and a high-
quality speaker system.
Equally impressive is the enormous sofa from which she watches TV each night. Lying on
the floor in her lounge are some of the latest film releases - including a pirate DVD copy of
the sci-fi movie Avatar.
And although she lives in a temporary accommodation in Harrow, Middlesex - funded by
the local council (A: That’s the taxpayer.) - she has managed to install a high-speed
internet connection. (A: That’s better than I’m getting and I’m paying high speed too for
it, although I’m getting twice the speed of dial-up thanks to XplorNet. Don’t ever use it
please, XplorNet.)
Speaking to the Daily Mail last night, Mrs Ibrahim said: 'I deserve to be given a proper
house. This one is too small for all of us. (A: That’s how they are when they have been
taught, abroad, that that is what you go there for. YOU’VE GOT ALL THESE RIGHTS, YOU
SEE, AND YOU DESERVE IT. THEY’VE GOT TO GIVE YOU SOMETHING. I KNOW MY RIGHTS.
You know. And she is an illegal alien right.)
'I don't think it's fair that the council has put us up in temporary accommodation. It's not
right that they have hounded us for four years. All these threats of eviction have made me
feel very ill.
'The law says that I can get a better house so I'm looking forward to a better life. (A: So
there you go. That’s part of what I’m talking about. This is just ONE of MANY as they
flood the countries and destroy all that was.)
Remember that Mr Blair himself and I’ve read the article on the air from the mainstream
newspaper article where he had told his next in command that they would open the floodgates
to immigration into an already flooded Britain, that was sinking. It couldn’t even cope with the
health care going down the tubes… too many people flooding in. He said THE REASON WAS TO
DESTROY THE CULTURE OF THE FACE OF EUROPE FOREVER OF THAT OF THE BRITISH CULTURE AND PEOPLE . A war
has been going on and most folk are utterly oblivious of it. They just live through it… and
accept everything.
This is only one instance of thousands and thousand and thousands. As the country could
never pay itself out of the debt it already owes. Who benefits? The boys who dreamed it up,
the Royal Institute of International Affairs remember, the Milner Group that was comprised of
the international bankers who want to control it because ITS BETTER, as Mr Rockefeller said, THAT
THE INTELLIGENTSIA AND BANKERS RULE THE WORLD AND PLAN THE WORLD, THAN LEAVE IT UP TO NATIONS AND
THEIR SELF, AUTO DETERMINATION. That is what it’s all about folks.
As we go down the tubes into this dehumanized system, we always hear about the Philippines
and the poorer countries where the people are conned into giving up a kidney or whatever for
cash rewards and end up spending what they are given – the pittance they are given for the
cash reward to give kidneys to wealth people generally in the States and Canada – they end
up spending the rest of it treating themselves for the fallout, with antibiotics and so on, of the
pretty fast, rather disgusting operations that they are given. So we are used to the poor being
exploited. We get used to it. In fact, we become inure to it. We become immune to it after
many years of hearing the same kind of stuff. It is happening too in the so-called, SO-CALLED
civilized countries as well.
Cash incentives offered for transplant organs
Laurie Nowell and Brigid O'Connell From: Sunday Herald Sun February 21, 2010
AUSTRALIA'S hospitals are being paid to harvest transplant organs from dead patients
under a $17 million Federal program. (A: Remember, they say dead patients but they
prefer to classify you clinically dead, that means brain dead. That’s what they are after
because they prefer to take you in to the patient who is going to be a recipient while your
heart is still beating. Then you’ve got a really fresh organ and it goes straight in to the
patient. So remember, be careful about the wording.)
AUSTRALIA'S hospitals are being paid to harvest transplant organs from dead patients.
A controversial new "activity-based funding" (A: I love the terminology, all from
Madison Avenue.) program administered by the federal Organ and Tissue Authority is
telling hospitals they can receive up to $11,400 for each patient who becomes a donor, the
Sunday Herald Sun reports. (A: It makes you wonder. You see, it already happens in
Canada, in Ontario I should say, they signed a law that anyone ENTERING an Ontario
hospital, if they die there, potentially is a donor. They fly in teams to try and hit their
grieving relatives to have them sign the person, who is maybe in a coma or whatever, to
give up their organs. They hit them when they are utterly vulnerable. ‘Flying teams’ they
call them.)
The funding is aimed at securing consent from grieving families and encouraging hospitals
to keep alive critically ill patients who would normally not be revived.
"The additional funding provided over the payment for donors identified in the ICU
recognises the need for the organ donation team to establish a rapport with the potential
donor's family and facilitate family consent," the program's information notes say.
That’s exactly what Canada’s already been doing for I think 2 years now. When you get
admitted into a hospital, you’ve got to understand that these surgeons get paid big bucks for
this and when they look at you and your STATUS in society, then think of the benefit to
themselves, which is straight forward included in their salary paycheck, or the cash they could
get from allowing you to die and harvesting your organs… what do you think you might go
with? Do you think they are really, truly are this TV image of scrupulous people that are
somehow angelic and always do the right thing? Do you really still believe that nonsense? Do
you really still believe that? I wonder. I wonder. Do you still believe that doctors are above it
all? That doctors are PURE and CLEAN all the time, all the way back to the first propaganda
whether it’s Dr Kildare and Marcus Welby MD and all the dramas and FICTION they’ve put on
television about them to raise them up into a high profession where we bow down and do what
we’re told?
There are stacks of articles out there on the corruption within the medical industry. It’s
probably one of the most corrupt industries there is. It’s the most greediest ones there is. Here
is one from the Philadelphia Regional Local News. I’ll put this link up too.
Frozen Fetuses Found During Doctor's Office Raid
Feb 23, 2010 - CBS3.com
PHILADELPHIA (CBS 3) ― Sources say dozens of frozen fetuses were found inside a
West Philadelphia doctor's office during a search.
Philadelphia and federal authorities who raided a doctor's office after allegations a woman
died following an abortion made a shocking discovery: more than two dozen frozen
fetuses.
For the second time in four days, Philadelphia Police, along with State Licensing officials
and DEA agents, searched the West Philadelphia office of Dr. Kermit Gosnell on Monday.
Sources tell Eyewitness News that the search came after a patient reportedly died
following an abortion on November 20.
According to the State Board of Medicine, Dr. Gosnell had an unlicensed staff member
conduct vaginal exams and administer medication.
In the November 20 case, the state claims the staff member administered Demerol,
Promethazine and Diazepam to the female patient.
After the doctor arrived at the clinic, the patient was given more medication. After the
doctor performed an abortion, the patient started to have an arrhythmia and later died, state
officials said. Autopsy results are pending.
Sources also told Eyewitness News that during the search, investigators recovered more
than two dozen fetuses stored in a freezer, some dating back 30 years. (A: Doesn’t
that kind of make you sick? You know one of the prime tenets, again, was
DEHUMANIZATION. Remember Julian Huxley said, the head of UNESCO at the United
Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural cooperation and all that rubbish, to bring in a
common culture, a debauched culture that would serve them better, he says, WE MUST
REDUCE THE HUMAN BEING FROM HIS PEDESTAL OF BEING SPECIAL AND DEHUMANIZE THEM.
THAT HAS HAPPENED people. This is ONE doctor in ONE place. Some of these fetuses
go back 30 YEARS. 30 years. Do you think this is an isolated incident?)
The fetuses are now being analyzed to reveal if illegal late-term abortions may have been
performed.
Records indicate that back in 1995, Gosnell was publicly reprimanded by the State
Licensing Board which found he ''employed a physician's assistant that was not certified ...
saw at least one patient and treated him." (A: So he’s been doing this all along. THAT’S
what you live in today. That is what you are living in today.)
There is GlaxoSmithKline, one of the ones who I think got one of the biggest contracts for
getting their non-effective flu shots, after they hyped up this nonsense by payoffs to people in
the World Heath Organization and everywhere else and lots of other governments to make sure
they got the contract, multibillion dollar contracts for this worthless flu shot that probably had
nothing to do with the flu at all. This article is from Natural News.
GlaxoSmithKline deliberately hid evidence of Avandia harm, says Senate
report
NaturalNews.com / February 23 2010 / by Mike Adams
(NaturalNews) GlaxoSmithKline, maker of the diabetes drug Avandia, knew the drug was
linked to tens of thousands of heart attacks but went out of its way to hide this
information from the public, says a 334-page report just released by the Senate Finance
Committee.
This report also accuses the FDA of betraying the public trust, explaining that FDA
bureaucrats intentionally dismissed safety concerns found by the agency's own
scientists. (A: Two weeks ago I put the link up there where the emails between the
scientists of a drug company, it might have been the same one, and the FDA were
conversing and the big company said WE HAVE SEVEN MEMBERS WITHIN THE FDA WHO WILL
VOTE IN OUR FAVOR. See, they are all paid off. But understand, this drug that they had
pushed for YEARS, for years, it said it has caused already confirmed…)
The document reveals some rather startling facts about the dangers of Avandia, including
evidence from the FDA's own scientists who concluded that Avandia was associated with
83,000 heart attacks. (A: …83,000 heart attacks in diabetics.)
Do you think companies that kill off people like that would have any qualms about killing off a
lot of people through inoculations as well? Look at the extent they have gone to cover this up.
They also did their old stuff too, they sent out heavies to threaten doctors who did their own
studies and found out what it was doing and threatened them with bodily harm, dis-reputation,
getting their licenses pulled, and all the usual dirty, stinking tricks that these big pharma mafias
actually do. That’s the reality of the medical profession. Behind that lovely white coat there is
an awful lot of dirt… an awful lot of dirt.
The other thing too is I mentioned it often before because I’ve studied the agenda, is the
system we are to go into and sustainability is really one that was well thought out. Part of it
was to use the old theories of Malthus and others to find ways of bringing the population down
to a state where we will not have very much energy. You must start killing off those who are
alive; not just killing off the ones who don’t get a chance to get born, but killing off those who
are alive. Part of it was to bring down the food supply, feed them lots of rubbish food; stuff
that would kill them but nothing that would nourish them. That has happened through GMO
food and processed foods and all the rest of it. They are putting out the small farmers by
deliberation.
It is also to go meatless because, you see, they studied all the ancient civilizations and those
who were still successful as having the same ruling crowd ruling over them, like India; they
thought that vegetarianism was the way to go too and they’ve been pushing it and pushing it.
That’s why Alvin Toffler in his book, The Third Wave, the one that Newt Gingrich gave every
Congressman, said in the book that THE SYSTEM WE ARE BRINGING IN WILL BE A VEGETARIAN SOCIETY AND
IT MUST BE SO. He didn’t say why but I’ve read their articles from previous people and it’s
because they know that you are not too healthy, you are not to MENTALLY with-it at times if
you are purely vegetarian, especially when they give you a limited choice of vegetables too.
Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and before I go to a caller, I’ll
just mention that the New York Times actually put an article out on the coming vegetarian
society starting with meat-free Monday. It’s a big national push funded by the foundations,
heavily promoted. It says…
A Push to Start the School Week Without Meat
By BAO ONG / February 22, 2010 / New York Times
All these different US states have signed on to it, without, again, asking the parents, I’d
imagine. I’ll put this link up and you can read it for yourself. It’s a nationwide thing, as I say,
and it’s to start getting children indoctrinated, along with the lectures, about how BAD animals
are for the planet as you grow them to eat meat and all the rest of it.
There is Lark in Texas on the phones. Are you there Lark?
Lark: How are you?
Alan: Not so bad.
Lark: Well, I have to admit I was laughing when you were telling us the story of Miss Flitchner.
I was reminded immediately of another name, the name Flecksner. I know you know who the
Flecksner Brothers were.
Alan: Yes.
Lark: I was wondering if they were of the same family and or bloodline.
Alan: It would be interesting to definitely delve into it.
Lark: Anyway, whether true or not it doesn’t matter, there are so many opportunists and
people that buy into this sophistic agenda nowadays just for a buck that it doesn’t even matter
any more.
Alan: I know.
Lark: People will sell out any true value or a moral code for a buck, every time, and it’s been
proven over and over again.
Alan: Absolutely and I’ve talked to teachers. When I was talking about that psychiatric
diagnostic manual, I went through teachers’ manuals on what they are being taught on how to
diagnose the children. It’s not just the psychiatrists that are diagnosing children to get them on
drugs, IT’S THE TEACHERS NOW WHO BELIEVE THEY ARE PSYCHIATRISTS as well and the drug
companies of course are putting lots of money into the teachers’ associations to encourage this
because they are behind it as well. The teachers have no qualms about drugging little Johnny
and shrinking his brain and they really truly believe that they know best.
Lark: Well, the first lie they bought into was this notion of credentialism and, you know, the
guaranteed job for life and the retirement benefits and so, MY GOODNESS, WE CAN’T SACRIFICE THAT.
Alan: I talked to one young girl; in fact it was one that was 25 years old and in another year or
so she will be at $170,000 a year. I said, you know you are all prostitutes… to a bunch of them,
these teachers I gave a talk to. They all put their heads down and none of them denied it. They
are all prostitutes for the status, for the incredible salary that they are getting at that age. They
are nothing but social prostitutes and social engineers to further degrade society, for their own
personal benefit.
Lark: I was also reminded of Wilhelm Wundt, the so-called founder of experimental psychology
and what a weasel this guy was. Then too, I was reminded of that ism, scientism and how easily
we are misled by so-called empirical evidence these days and how we’ve elevated science to
such a lofty status in our society without examining where that science came from.
Alan: And without even questioning that there was actually a political agenda behind it.
Huxley said, SCIENCE WILL BE ELEVATED ABOVE RELIGION AS THEY DESTROY RELIGION AND THEN WE SHALL
OBEY IT. He said too, IT WOULD BE A SCIENTIFIC TYRANNY BUT HE PREFERRED A SCIENTIFIC TYRANNY OVER ANY
OTHER KIND. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish the dog and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or
your God GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Political Psychiatry on Roll to Classify all Behaviour as Abnormal
Teachers Perform Lap Dance and Simulate Oral Sex in front of Schoolchildren
Illegal Immigrant granted Council Housing and Support for family
CBS Eyewitness News-Frozen Fetuses found During Doctor's Office Raid, some from 30yrs. Ago
- Senate Report
I’m always talking about reality. It’s something that people think they’re in but seldom are and
even people who should know better often fall back into the red herrings that are put out there for
them to chase after. You know, 10 years ago, or 15 years ago, people in the US especially who
were rather vigilant, a lot of people were still vigilant whilst the rest were sleeping and
consuming, they had so many ways to keep in touch with each other. Today the ‘patriot’
community would hang out the white flags if the Internet went down. I’m not kidding you. They
don’t need anything else happening, just the Internet going down and out comes the white flags
outside their windows. It’s all over for them. Astonishing, astonishing how we adapt until we’re
utterly helpless and we can’t think of anything else to do. We forget all the other ways of
communications that have been around for such an awful long time and yet people are going
frantic when they read things like ‘Obama can shut down the Internet in a national emergency’.
Well, so what?
If you’re so dependent on the Internet, and you think that is freedom, then you’re already gone.
You’re already gone. The Internet is out there for the elite to serve themselves, not to serve you.
Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix just reminding people to use
their heads and not to be run by fear. There’s an old saying. “If you can’t handle the truth, don’t
look for it’ and it’s very, very true because the truth can be rather harsh and if you allow yourself
to be afraid of it then it’ll floor you. It’ll put you into a neurosis or a static state where you’re
sitting shivering under the kitchen table and that’s not where you want to be. Don’t let yourself
be sidetracked by people who just scare the bejesus out of you and leave it at that.
Handle the truth, handle the truth and if no-one’s sitting outside your door right now in some
black government truck or whatever ready to blast you to smithereens, then don’t worry about it.
You’ve been living this long and this New World Order has been going on before you were born.
It was happening before your parents were born. Every part and every stage is just a part to the
next phase; all pre-planned of course, including the takedown. But you’ve got to be able to
handle the bad news and you don’t panic at the first headlines that come out there that Obama
can shut down the Internet and then you hang out the white flags in front of your apartments or
your houses because it’s suddenly all over because you can’t type to someone anymore. What a
shame, I wonder what your predecessors would have done? There’s no Plan B, C, D or E.
It’s just astonishing how people have become addicted to the Internet and they can’t figure out
any other way to communicate to each other if anything should happen; astonishing. To me
that’s astonishing. Bad news will always come along, always come along and the most you can
do is take what’s relevant, what isn’t so relevant to you and prepare day by day, week by week
and so on for yourself and those that you love basically to get through bad, bad times. That’s the
best you can honestly do because we’re up against the most organised system that’s ever existed
on planet earth, totally integrated with each other through academia, through countless think
tanks, foundations and organisations, all cooperating with the governments and we don’t put the
government officials into power, the big boys do.
See, ‘democracy’ never ever existed. It was a great con while it lasted and democracy to an
extent can give you, while they’re using you of course, because people are always used, and
Charles Galton Darwin was quite right when he said in his own book that “people have always
been slaves in one form or another and we’re simply creating a more sophisticated form of
slavery”. That was democracy with its taxation and during a productive period where you’ve go
to build up the economy, use your tax money for projects abroad, or wars as they take over the
planet, they allow you to drive old ‘junker’ cars with rust on it and so on. The cops stay off your
back during that period. You get your cheap cigarettes and your cheap booze and you get your
cheap entertainment. No-one bothers you. You can live in an old shack somewhere and there’s
no official coming up to measure it and saying : “You can’t live there. It’s not good for the local
surrounding area and the plants and the wildlife.”
You didn’t get that then. It’s only after your usefulness is over for that part, and they’ve
completed their mission, they’ve taken all your industry from you, they don’t need you anymore
and that’s when they say: “My goodness, we’re pulling your old junker off the road because
there’s a hole there and carbon monoxide might get through.” And here you are talking to a cop
through your open window. What’s that space there that you’re talking through?
And then they crush your car and all the rest of it. Then up go your smokes because they don’t
want you to smoke anymore and so on and so on.
If you notice, China’s going through their industrial phase and the peasantry there, just like the
peasantry everywhere else, is allowed cheap smokes and lots of fun and that kind of stuff too and
they can drive their old junkers without being annoyed by squads of cops on the roads.
This is a system we live through, a system, and believe you me, a lot of people do crack up with
the information that’s thrown out there and they cannot discern what is real, what is fake or
what’s meant to immobilise you with fear and terror. They can’t distinguish eventually.
I read an article just a few days ago where a couple with two children had committed suicide and
killed one of their children and shot the other one two or three times but it survived, the baby,
because they believed the mainstream media that was telling them it was going to be a hopeless
future of global warming and desert, desertification, no forests and all that kind of stuff. That’s
what drove them to that, listening to that stuff. They were right into environmentalism but they
believed every bit of propaganda that was pumped into them.
It’s the same thing too when you get into trying to fight the evil that’s all around the world.
You’ve got to discern what’s real, what isn’t, what you can do about something, what you can’t
and you don’t allow yourself to be crushed and panicked by the stuff that’s thrown out to you on
a daily basis. Remember now, our perception of things have changed drastically, drastically since
they gave us the Internet, again mainly to monitor us and classify all of us with our daily
activities. We must be predictable in a totalitarian society, that’s why we’ve got it.
It also gives you news from all over the planet and the world isn’t changing. You might hear
about a tsunami here or an earthquake there but that has always happened down through history,
but when you hear this stuff coming out you think; ‘oh my God, the world’s collapsing, it’s
caving in on itself. Everything’s going crazy. Blah, blah blah, blah, blah because you’ve got
access to more data and information than you ever, ever had before.
If you were in the Middle Ages it wouldn’t matter if there were 10 volcanoes going up and 15
Pacific islands sunk under them, you’d never have heard about them so you wouldn’t have been
worried about it.
The media makes a great deal about this kind of stuff trying to scare the bejesus out of you and
for a lot of people it works.
I’ve gone through, as best I can, a lot of this agenda by giving you the official documents from
the official people who were helping working it into being and you know, most people would
rather look at something else than look and study the dry material that comes from governments,
or it comes from their main helpers and think tanks, that outline their whole agenda in phases; 5,
10, 15, 50 year plans, a 100 year plan. I give you all these links and so on for the PDFs that they
churn out of the think tanks for the governments. We see how it’s being implemented stage by
stage by stage. We’ve gone through this. I went through this, years ago, and I keep doing it up to
the present, but people are so easily sidetracked by really, really, purposefully put out there,
trivia that sidelines you off into ‘terrorland’.
Now government has counterintelligence out there. They have their teams that will hack your
computers and so on but most of their job is in counterintelligence and they will leak stuff out
there to the public. I read about it before about the budget for some of the military colleges and
so on that are dealing with this and their budgets, are putting out false information and they’ll put
them out under different names, different organisations that don’t even exist and then it’s
repeated off in mainstream news or patriot news and people prattle it and before you know it’s
blown out of all proportion and it’s working very well. Everyone’s mind is collapsing with it and
they’re crippled with terror and fear.
Always be wary of the data that you allow to come into your brain. You are the guardian of your
own brain, no-one else is and believe you me the brain is such an important thing. Governments
have put billions of dollars of research into how to control your brain, from basic psychology,
basic through psychic driving and repetition of terror, over and over and over again, using
slogans of terror. And they’ve also used the electromagnetic fields and things like that.
I’ve read the books by Brzezinski that he churned out in the ‘70s on the ‘technotronic era’ and
how they would try and control whole continents with their emotions or their behaviour by the
use of technotronic techniques. These are the things that have been put out from the top that are
real because your money, your tax money went into it.
Here’s an article here. Now I mentioned this years ago about television, just basic televisions to
show you that right from the very beginning they knew about what they could do to your mind,
apart from all the rubbish they put on there. Here’s a patent here, a US patent. This one here is
January 14th, 2003. It’s one of many I’m sure and it’s one of the more recent and I’m sure
there’re much, much older ones in the same area.
“Nervous system can be manipulated by electromagnet fields”
(A: From monitors)
“Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the
skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near 1/2 Hz or 2.4
Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when
displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause
such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing
images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may
be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either
as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed
effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields
capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the
displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.”
(A: That’s one of many of the things that governments have been working on for an awful, awful
long time and you’re all stuck staring at that screen all day long and you wonder why you’re
getting terrified.)
I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
That patent I just read was actually applied for in 2001. As I say, whatever’s applied for through
the patent office, to me, is generally obsolete because the big boys at the top, much higher up
than the military-industrial complex, believe you me, already have that stuff working very
effectively.
It’s interesting too with the articles I’ve read in the past, to do with Microsoft even, with their
helmets and their computer interfaces where these helmets with their little sensors can
manipulate or just basically probe your brain at the cortex of your brain and work in conjunction
with your thoughts. Supposedly that’s what they’re working on and at the same time Microsoft in
one of its own little releases admitted they were using some laptops for instance or working on
laptops that had the same kind of technology built into the frame around the screen so you
wouldn’t need the helmet.
So this stuff is old, but apart from that, about 2 years ago I think it was I read an article from the
Pentagon on its weaponised forms of killer viruses. Not to kill the computer, although they can
certainly ‘fry’ it, but to actually work the signals of your body in such a way that your blood
vessels could narrow so quickly because they understand the language of what turns on and off
your system via the eyes; just the eyes themselves even and they can actually cause a stroke.
That was a Pentagon paper release.
So be careful with all of this stuff. Be careful too on how much time you spend in front of the
box there, whether it’s the TV or the computer.
When you see teachers across the US manipulating the laptops that are given to the children,
because they’re free; they’re free and everybody grabs them. You know if there was cyanide
dressed up as a new age bon bon, a sugar bon bon candy and they said it was free, everybody
would take it. That’s how far gone the public are.
A mouse has got more caution approaching a trap trying to get the cheese than we have anymore.
Just say it’s free and we run like a herd, gone. Next thing you know, the teachers are looking into
the children, watching them at home. How long has that been going on for? How long has that
been going on for? Do you think that government doesn’t do the same thing through your
computers?
Apart from the stuff they have admitted to, the screeds of stuff I’ve talked about on the radio
from their own findings from universities that are given access to your computer data amongst
the various intelligence agencies that are given complete access to all your data on a daily basis
as they study you.
That’s just that. They’re doing other things as well obviously. Technotronic warfare, it was
called ‘technotronic’ and now it’s under the field of neuroscience.
I’ll put this patent link up for you to look at yourself after the show. All these articles I always
put up on my site when Xplornet, the satellite upload characters, allow me twice dial-up speed
for high speed. That’s what they call high speed and if you use too much of it, what they claim is
too much, they put you right down until you’re below dial-up speed. That’s the wonders of
modern technology but it’s also the wonders of what they can do to you if they don’t like you
very much.
Now, we’re run by think tanks. Governments don’t come to the public to see what the public
want. That’s an idea that we’re given with democracy, they somehow come to ask us what we
want. I don’t think that ever really happens except when governments allow NGOs in that work
for the foundations that demand things and get what they want. They’re allowed inside it but we
are run by think tanks and special think tanks on a very high level staffed with academics that are
pulled out often out of a university before they even qualify because they’re brighter than the rest
in their particular area and particular speciality.
An example is the ‘Foresight’; another one that advises the governments, including Britain, and
they’ve just released their report, the Foresight’s Report and the site here says:
(A: Did you know that? Did these characters come forward and say “vote Labour” or “vote
Liberal, and you’ll also get Foresight and get Rand along with them?” They never mention that
do they? Why don’t they go up for election? You see, democracy’s a farce. Politics is a complete
farce. So here’s one of them, one of the many governments are working with.
“Foresight’s role is to help government think systematically about the future. We use the latest
scientific and other evidence combined with futures analysis to tackle complex issues and help
policymakers make decisions affecting our future.
Our work makes a critical contribution to meeting important challenges of the 21st century...”
“ flooding...”
“...and obesity.”
(A: Obesity comes in with this and of course they won’t tell you why that’s lumped in with this
and then they have their toolkits there and the networks. The links are here. You can look into
them. But you look down, you scroll down just to see what they’re really up to. They did...)
“...a two-year study involving over 300 experts in subjects ranging from ecology, economics,
planning and geography, outlines that a new approach to managing the UK’s land will be vital
to meet the challenges of the 21st century.”
(A: There’re a whole bunch of things down here from land use, global food and farming
measures, global environmental migration, because they expect people to start moving out if they
start to think there’s going to be a...All they have to say is “it’s going to be dry for the next 20
years in a country”. That’s all they have to say. Hype it up, they’ll make them believe anything
and mass migration will occur. That’s how stupid the people are.)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix, bringing some reality back into life
by showing the simplicity of the techniques that are really used because most things are really
pretty simple. There are sciences which deal with managing ‘the masses’ as they call them, the
great masses and then categories of different people within the masses, their own ‘sub-masses’
and so on. These are old, old sciences, well understood and taught in academia.
They’ve always said, you see, in a true democracy it would always be hard for a true democracy
to stand for any length of time because countries that are not democratic can put things into gear
very quickly and get a whole nation mobilised into whatever they want them to do, very quickly,
because they’re obedient in that totalitarian society, whereas a democracy has to coerce and
cajole and humour the public to go along and they need a lot of propaganda over a long period of
time to make it happen.
That’s why the Club of Rome in their book, ‘The First Global Revolution’ said that of all the
systems they looked at, Communism, Socialism - which is really Communism or Collectivism –
and so on, the most they favoured was Collectivism for the future and that is what we’re going
under now. They said the world would be ‘post democratic’ and we are.
That’s when you must get in the heavy hand of government because people will obey and that’s
why they chose a war scenario. A ‘war on terror’ fitted the bill and a ‘war of man against nature
and the environment’ was the reason for it as well. That would also fit the bill. They said that
themselves in their own book and I’ve quoted it so many times and I’m pretty well sick of it, but
we are easily managed.
Getting back to the totalitarian systems, it’s far easier for them. That’s why the UN picked China
for the model state for the world to emulate, not just with their one child per family policy,
mandatory abortion and all the rest of it, far more, but their whole way of living over in China.
They’re a ‘mass man’ in China; ‘mass people’ and in totalitarian regimes you must give them an
exciting future. It’s always something in the distant future but you’re all working together
towards it. That’s exactly what they’ve brought in to us in the West now. We’re all in a warfare
scenario. We’ve all to pull together. We’re all one working towards a common cause and we
must all sacrifice. That’s what totalitarianism lives on, feeds on. That’s its modus operandi.
This article here shows how they can do things much quicker in China because remember,
they’re still technically Communist.
This is February 24th 2010. It’s the women’s page from ‘Spotlight China’ newspaper.
“The ACWF Advocates A Low Carbon Life among Women”
(A: And it says. Now here you go. It’s so socialistic the terminology they use. You have to read
it for yourself to see how they phrase things. Remember that Lenin himself said that “we shall
win by the use of slogans”, the repetition of slogans, psychic driving. It says:)
“The All-China Women's Federation, the Civilization Office of the Central Communist Party
Committee, and the National Development and Reform Commission have jointly pushed for
Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Community Action by carrying out a "Low
Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" activity this year.”
(A: "Low Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" is a slogan which they use over there. It’s in
quotation marks. Listen to all the organisations. The National Development and Reform
Commission, the Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Community Action and societies
and so on “by carrying out a "Low Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" activity this year.”
Slogans, slogans, slogans gets them right into action.)
“Activities are to be held by women and within households nationwide to promote a low-carbon
lifestyle, to spread low-carbon awareness, and to encourage families to live a green life of low
energy, low emission, low expense and low cost. Each household is encouraged to live a green
life...”
(A: Oh, so they’re going from red to green, which is the sacred colour of Communism. Red is for
the revolutionary part.)
“...so as to form a life style and a consumption pattern that conserves energy and protects the
environment. Families are to contribute their efforts to the development of an economy based on
green energy, low-carbon output, and recycling.
(A: I don’t know what that is – “and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.”
“Launching ceremonies will be held at the capital of each local administrative region.”
(A: You realise that all this is synchronised together. Just do this and it’s done. You just shout
from the top and they all just run into action.)
“The launching ceremony in Beijing will indicate the start of the activity. The activity will make
an appeal to all families to live a low-carbon lifestyle. Posters will be put up. Banners will be
hung high. Leaflets will be distributed among the participants.”
They’re also pushing for a low-meat diet and to grow more veggies, which of course is the
agenda here as well, GMO of course, GMO of course. But it’s got all the different tips at the
bottom what the women have to do. It’s great too how they split. You see the societies which are
totalitarian need to split the men and the women up. They split them up and they create an
organisation out of one and an organisation out of the other. They also split the children from the
parents psychologically and through their education, they sever the ties and they get the more
upgraded education/indoctrination and they’re also separate with their own mandate to follow
out.
That’s the beauty of having a totalitarian regime. It’s so quick and easy to do. Here we’ve to live
in the West with lies and politicians that pretend to shout to each other or at each other and all
the rest of it and go through the motions. Then the representatives that you think you elected
come back and tell you that they can’t do much because they must vote with the party and all
that stuff.
We go through these silly, ridiculous routines all the time. Meanwhile the bureaucracies are
running the countries as they always have and the politicians come and go, come and go and
come and go and they sign whatever’s put in front of them. “Sign this” – “Right ok.”
That’s real life. That’s what life is really all about. We’re cajoled and conned and humoured.
Now, the International Monetary Fund, I’ve said this so many times again too, was set up, along
with the United Nations, to become a global power. Everything was to be centralised, first
through nations under the communistic techniques, centralise all power, centralise all money
power and then between the countries you make treaties. You centralise them into regions and
then you centralise them into the United Nations. That’s what the whole deal was if you read
your books about the founding, the setting up and the purpose of the United Nations with all of
its many branches.
“IMF chief pushes for more power, new global currency”
That was Saturday, February 27th, 2010 from Raw Story.
“The International Monetary Fund wants more power to police the global financial system and
a bigger role in emergency financing, managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said Friday.
In a speech to the Bretton Woods Committee, a finance reform think tank in Washington,
D.C...”.
(A: There’s another private think tank.)
“...he claimed that a stronger IMF also warrants a new global reserve currency that would
serve as an alternative to the U.S. Dollar.”
(A: They keep repeating this and they’ll get what they want.)
"Strauss-Kahn said such an asset could be similar to but distinctly different from the IMF's
special drawing rights, or SDRs...”
“...the accounting unit that countries use to hold funds within the IMF," ABC News reported. "It
is based on a basket of major currencies."
"One day, the Fund might even be called upon to provide a globally issued reserve asset, similar
to -- but in important respects different from -- the SDR," he said.
Strauss-Kahn added that "having several suppliers of reserve assets would limit the extent to
which the international monetary system as a whole depends on the policies and conditions of a
single, albeit dominant, country."
(A: And he goes on and on and on with more and more and more.)
“Both China and Moscow support such a plan, but U.S. leaders have vehemently insisted that
empowering the IMF's special drawing rights, or establishing another fund with a global pull
similar to the Dollar, is not necessary.”
Well, they have to say that to keep the pundits in the US voting, you know, and that’s the reality
of it too. Centralisation’s the key to all totalitarianism and the worst totalitarianism is global;
global. When you’re all global and living under a tyranny, you have no other country to compare
yourself with, you understand that?
In the past people knew how bad it was in different countries and you could always say, “My
goodness, we don’t want to end up like them.” So you had something to give you an example.
Once you’re all global, you have no examples left. You’ll think that anything is normal, anything
at all. We already do.
Look at all the things that have been crammed down our throats since 2001 for the new century.
That’s why they picked 2001, the new century. The century of change they called it for 50 years
in academia before 2001, the coming century of change. “Change is good, change is good, quack
quack, vote for me.”
People don’t even know what they’re living through.
Now, totalitarianism is the new method you see, under Collectivism or Communism or
Socialism, you call it what you want. It’s all the same thing really and you find here that the head
of the economic union, the president they’ve just put in there, that the people didn’t put in, in fact
he’s selected secretly apparently, like everything else they do there, in this beautiful new
Sovietised European Union, this region, he’s now fining people who criticise him.
When politicians can’t criticise and put a show on to each other, as they criticise each other,
without getting fined then you know you’re under a straight-faced totalitarian regime.
This article is from the ‘European Voice’ 2nd March 2010.
“European Parliament President Jerzy Buzek has fined Nigel Farage, leader of the UK
Independence Party MEPs, €3,000...”
(A: €3,000 is not to be sniffed at.)
“...as punishment for “un-parliamentary and insulting” comments he made about Herman Van
Rompuy, president of the European Council.”
(A: This is the same council by the way where one of the top guys said about a year ago, a year
and a half ago, he said that if you criticise the EU, if any citizen criticises the Economic Union
and the Parliament that was akin to heresy. Heresy was the word they used in the newspapers. It
says;)
“Buzek's office confirmed that the president had fined Farage the maximum he could by
withholding ten days worth of daily attendance allowances at €300 a day under the Parliament's
code of conduct rules.”
(A: Gee, that’s not bad eh. €3,000. Now you know why they don’t do much in that parliament.)
“The fine was imposed hours after Farage refused to apologise formally for his comments,
which have been heavily criticised by other MEPs. This was despite a direct request to do so by
Buzek.
The outspoken British MEP described Van Rompuy to his face as having “the charisma of a
damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk,”
(A: Which is true, which is true, that’s what he looks like. He’s got about as much charisma as
H.G. Wells did. H.G. Wells when he talked to the Fabian Club he used to get laughed at by the
people there. Mind you, the Webbs were even worse, Sidney and Beatrice Webb. You should see
who their offspring are by the way. It would surprise you, but that’s another story. It says;)
“The remarks that Buzek said violated the Parliament's rules of conduct. Farage also labelled
Belgium “pretty much a non-country”.
“I cannot accept this sort of behaviour in the European Parliament,” Buzek said, adding that he
was “disappointed” by Farage's conduct and his refusal to apologise.
(A: Well as I say, when politicians can’t say what they want, because that was standard fare for
the circus for the public in Britain and here’s a British member of the European Parliament over
there doing what you normally do in Britain but it’s ‘verboten’ because you’re in a new system
now, a totalitarian system. The members of the European Parliament have no powers anyway.
They can’t even vote on laws or anything. They’re there for show. It’s worked out that they get
an average I think it was of 20 minutes per year each to speak. That’s the farce to keep the public
happy. Your politician might get 20 minutes out of the whole year to say something after
blowing his nose and so on.)
Now things are getting so bad now and it’s so beautiful too that they know how far gone we are
at the top psychologically as opposed to people 50 years ago when it came to common sense and
stuff, to do with perception management, that as we go down the tubes, the shops close down and
this kind of thing is happening all over the Western world, what are they doing to pretend that
things are still ok?
This is from the Mail Online. It says;
“The deli that’s for window shoppers only: Fake shopfronts built to cover up High St stores
that have closed down”
4th March 2010.
“As High Streets are decimated by the recession – fake business facades have been installed to
create the illusion that shops are still occupied.
North Tyneside Council is trialling the new window treatment that at first glance gives the
impression that units are occupied.
The crumbling facade of a vacant clothing store in the centre of Whitley Bay has made way for a
smart shop front with the question ‘Delicatessen?’ and close by ‘This retail space could be
yours...’
The same approach is being considered for empty premises in North Shields and Wallsend.”
(A: So that’s Britain’s answer to depression and bankruptcy, is to con the public by making
things appear normal so that you’ll feel better because you see, we’ve been taught to be
consumers. If it still appears like things aren’t run down and things are still moving then we’ll
feel ok. This is way beyond Pavlov. I hope you understand the minds that are dreaming all this
stuff up for us. And if they fool you with that and treat you like children, they know they can fool
people and that’s why they’re doing it. We become children. What else is an illusion? It says;)
“We need to ensure that the remaining businesses continue to survive and that means ensuring
our High Streets look as attractive as possible to both shoppers and potential business investors.
This is a simple and cost effective approach that keeps the retail unit available for potential new
uses and in the meantime also contributes to the street scene.”
(A: Ain’t that wonderful eh? Ain’t that wonderful? And here we are watching and living through
all this farce and people are worried as I say about the Internet going down. What will they do?
The world has come to an end, a complete and utter end. Makes you wonder eh?)
Now, a totalitarian regime, and the one we’re in is definitely totalitarian with all its Communist
rules, what to say, what to think, what not to think, with even the techniques they use to inhibit
you from thinking about certain things. They put ‘fail-safes’ in the mind. This is how they
describe it in psychology, how they can condition people. They’ve got a fail-safe there. They
actually used techniques that they’d studied by people who were deeply religious. Someone who
is deeply religious who was going into an area of thought that could potentially be a sin, they
veered away from it. The same techniques are now used about what’s politically correct and
that’s what they’re using and I’ll explain this after I come back from this break.
I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about how Socialism, Communism,
whatever you want to call it, works or any totalitarian movement really, how it really works on a
mass level and indoctrination is very important and they know exactly how to bring in new ideas,
how to promote new ideas until we ‘parrot’ them all and the media’s always on board with them
at all steps of the upgrading and that’s what they’re doing. They’re upgrading you all the time
right down to what you think, what you say. You’re not allowed to discover anything for
yourself and formulate your own opinion anymore. That’s ‘verboten’. We’re all standardised.
We’re all the same. It’s like that China article I read recently. That’s what we are.
We’re all the same and here’s where it’s going now with their indoctrination and their inability to
allow individuality or self-expression to come out at all. This again is where the whole world is
going because Britain is the flagship for this.
Mail Online, 4th March 2010.
“Heads will be forced to list children as young as five on school ‘hate registers’ over everyday
playground insults.
Even minor incidents must be recorded as examples of serious bullying and details kept on a
database until the pupil leaves secondary school.”
(A: That’ll never leave the database.)
“Teachers are to be told...”
(A: These are the same teachers in Britain who are so happy to drug the children. Now not all
teachers are bad, especially the older ones that lived through and saw this stuff coming in, but a
lot of the young ones are all ‘gung ho’ because they’ve been brought up thinking it’s quite
normal to drug children.)
“Teachers are to be told that even if a primary school child uses homophobic or racist words
without knowing their meaning,...
(A: ...“without knowing their meaning...” Now, these children are watching movies and stuff all
the time and if you want to hear stuff you get it all through the movies and so on and they parrot
them, all the swear words and even all the sexual stuff. So if they parrot this stuff “without
knowing their meaning...)
“...simply teaching them such words are hurtful and inappropriate is not enough.
Instead the incident has to be recorded and his or her behaviour monitored for future signs of
‘hate’ bullying.
The accusations will also be recorded in databases held by councils and made available to
Whitehall and ministers to help them devise future anti-bullying campaigns.”
(A: So just saying something is now considered bullying.)
“The scale of the effort to stop children using homophobic or racist language was revealed after
the parents of a ten-year-old primary school pupil
(A: They always give you one example that’s blown out of proportion.)
“...in Sommerset, Peter Drury, were told that his name would be put on a register and his
behaviour monitored while he remained at school.
The boy was reported after he called a friend ‘gay boy’. His parents fear the record of
homophobic bullying will count against him throughout his school career and even into
adulthood.
In another incident last year, a six-year-old girl Sharona Gower, was reported for ‘racist
bulling’ at her school in Tunbridge Wells in Kent.”
It’s such a farcical thing because, you see, every nationality that comes into this school, there’re
enough of them, from enough places, they all form their own cliques right away, their own little
gangs, that’s what they do but you’re not allowed to speak about it and you’re not supposed to
have any opinions for yourself. You’re supposed to take the standard politically correct opinion
for everything.
That’s the world we’re into – Totalitarianism – brought by the leading country for world
democracy; Great Britain.
Now I don’t know if there’re any callers because my page didn’t go up tonight to see but I’ll be
back tomorrow night again, so from Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, and before I say
this, before I say “it’s goodnight and may your God or your Gods, go with you” I should also
say, take the data, be empowered by the data, overcome your fear and you’ll feel much stronger.
Back tomorrow night.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Manipulation of Nervous System by Pulses from TV or Computer Monitors