Inventory Methods
Inventory Methods
The retail method provides the ending inventory balance for a store by measuring
the cost of inventory relative to the price of the goods. In essence, it determines
how much expense to recognize this period versus the next period.
The retail method assumes that all your inventory has a consistent markup,
explains Abir Syed (CPA) of UpCounting. “So you take the total value of what you
have for sale, reduce it by its markup, and use that number as your cost.”
The benefit of this method, explains Abir, is that it’s extremely easy to calculate
and can work when you have weak inventory cost tracking. “The main con is that
it’s generally not very accurate, especially if you have prices that fluctuate at
different times of the year (which most retailers do), and if you have products with
different markups.”
FitSmallBusiness tax and accounting analyst Tim Yoder says the retail inventory
method works best if you have a standard markup, within broad product lines. “If
your markups vary widely among products, then your estimate won’t be very
accurate,” says Tim.
This is when you assign a specific cost to each and every item in your store. Abir
says this method makes the most sense for retailers that have a lot of different
items, especially if they were bought from various sources. “A good example
would be an antique dealer,” says Abir.
The pros and cons of the specific identification method depend on the size of your
retail business, according to the Corporate Finance Institute (CFI). For the specific
identification method to suit your retail business, you need to be able to
confidently and accurately identify the location, cost, and sale amount of every
stock-keeping unit (SKU) in your inventory. The bigger your business and its
inventory, the harder that becomes.
The CFI suggests specific identification is better suited to small businesses because
it can give them a more accurate profit and loss statement, with reliable numbers
on income and losses and normal spoilage of inventory (due to things like
accidental damage).
“Let’s say someone sells unique paintings that they buy from local artists and then
sells,” says Abir.
“This person has one painting in stock worth $150. They then buy three paintings
for $100, $200, and $350. So their total cost of inventory is the sum of all the
individual costs ($150 + $100 + $200 + $350 = $800).”
“If they then sell the $200 painting, their cost of inventory would be $800 – $200 =
$600. Each item’s cost is tracked separately.”
3. The First In, First Out (FIFO) method
When you have large numbers of nearly identical items, specific identification may
not be worth the effort. First In First Out, or FIFO, might be better. FIFO assumes
that any sale of an item is from the oldest batch on hand, and is relevant when the
prices you bought it at fluctuate.
“This method will give you a very accurate representation of your inventory, which
can be beneficial if you buy batches of the same item at varying prices,” says Abir.
“It will often mirror reality as older units of a stock-keeping unit (that scannable
barcode) tend to be sold before the newer ones in ideal circumstances.
“The downside is that it takes more effort to track different costs within the same
stock-keeping unit for different batches of purchases. For example, if you sell a
particular shirt with one universal product code (UPC) that was bought in three
batches, it’s harder to track a different cost for each batch than one cost for the
entire UPC.”
As Freshbooks explains, you can calculate FIFO by multiplying the cost of your
oldest inventory by the amount of that inventory sold.
“Let’s say someone sells leather jackets,” says Abir. “They buy 10 for $100 each,
and then later 10 more for $90 each. The total value of the inventory will be ($100
x 10) + ($90 x 10) = $1,900. Even if all jackets were identical and sitting on the
same rack, if they were to sell three jackets, they would calculate the Cost of
Goods Sold (COGS) by deducting it from the older batch purchased at $100/each
—regardless of which batch they were actually sold from.”
He adds: “So their ending inventory cost would be $1,900 minus (3 x $100) =
$1,600. The logic here is that the more accurate inventory cost would be the more
recent purchase price, as that’s the price you’re more likely to buy more inventory
at.”
LIFO, as the name suggests, is basically the opposite of FIFO. It treats the last
items bought as the first ones sold. Here’s what Abir has to say about this method.
“LIFO is when you attribute specific costs to individual items or batches of items
based on their actual cost, and you reduce your cost as you sell items with the last
items added being removed from inventory first. This method only makes sense
when it actually mirrors reality where the newest items are sold first, and older
items can sit there for a long time.”
It’s not a particularly common method, he explains, because this rarely happens in
retail.
LIFO is definitely not for every retailer. In fact, it can only be used in the United
States under the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Elsewhere,
this method is not allowed by the International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS). It can create an added burden around record-keeping. For many
businesses, it’s a system that is just too complex to justify using.
That said, one of the main benefits is tax. Because LIFO results in a higher Costs
of Goods Sold (COGS), the method may help rein in tax liabilities. Still, it’s
always important to check the exact impacts of LIFO with your accountant or tax
advisor.
Investopedia has the following helpful LIFO example, of a furniture store that buys
200 chairs for $10 per unit. Next month the store buys another 300 chairs for $20
each, and at the end of their accounting period, it has sold 100 total chairs.
Here’s a more detailed LIFO example, from the Corporate Finance Institute.
With the weighted average method, you use a pool of cost for all units of a
particular stock keeping unit. Any purchase is added to the pool of cost, and the
pool of cost is divided by all units you have on hand.
“The benefit is that it’s much easier to track than specific costing because you
don’t need to know exactly which batch a sold unit was part of, which is especially
helpful when you have many identical units,” says Abir. It may also give you a
more accurate costing method than the retail method—which doesn’t compensate
for discounts or differing margins across SKUs.
What is the downside? This method can be less accurate than specific costing
because you’re blending all your purchases together, says Abir. “But this is only a
real problem if you buy a particular stock-keeping unit at very different prices each
time you purchase, which 1. Bulk shipments
This method banks on the notion that it is almost always cheaper to purchase and
ship goods in bulk. Bulk shipping is one of the predominant techniques in the
industry, which can be applied for goods with high customer demand.
The downside to bulk shipping is that you will need to lay out extra money on
warehousing the inventory, which will most likely be offset by the amount of
money saved from purchasing products in huge volumes and selling them off fast.
Works well for staple products with predictable demand and long shelf lives
Category A
abc-a-2
abc-b
Category C
abc-c
The key is to operate each category separately, particularly when selective control,
allocation of funds, and human resources are required.
abc analysis
3. Backordering
When there’s just one out-of-stock item, it’s simply a case of creating a new
purchase order for that one item and informing the customer when the backordered
item will arrive. When it’s tens or even hundreds of different sales a day, problems
begin to mount.
Nonetheless, enabling backorders means increased sales, so it’s a juggling act that
many businesses are willing to take on.
As a general rule, the bigger the item value (physically and monetarily), the more
“delivery tolerance” you get from customers.
If you’re a small retailer, it may not be feasible to risk overstocking. In this case,
you might consider labeling the item’s “Buy now” button as “Pre-order” or “Get
yours when it comes back in stock.” This creates a reasonable expectation for
customers that it will take a bit longer to arrive.
Alternatively, some businesses run with a “no-stock” approach which involves
taking only backorders until they’ve generated enough sales to then place a large
bulk in order with a supplier.
Pros of backordering
Cons of backordering
backordering
Just In Time (JIT) inventory management lowers the volume of inventory that a
business keeps on hand. It is considered a risky technique because you only
purchase inventory a few days before it is needed for distribution or sale.
JIT helps organizations save on inventory holding costs by keeping stock levels
low and eliminates situations where deadstock - essentially frozen capital - sits on
shelves for months on end.
However, it also requires businesses to be highly agile with the capability to handle
a much shorter production cycle.
If you’re considering adopting a Just in Time inventory management strategy, ask
yourself the following:
Does my inventory management system offer the flexibility needed to update and
manage stock levels on the fly?
Pros of JIT
Less deadstock
Cons of JIT
Risk of stockouts
just in time
5. Consignment
For retailers, selling on consignment can have several benefits, including the
ability to:
While most of the risk in selling on consignment falls on the wholesaler, there are
still a number of potential advantages for the supplier:
consignment@2x-1
Essentially, it means you move goods from one transport vehicle directly onto
another with minimal or no warehousing. You might need staging areas where
inbound items are sorted and stored until the outbound shipment is complete. Also,
you will require an extensive fleet and network of transport vehicles for cross-
docking to work.
drop-shipping@2x-1
cross docking