2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon.

Other stars how-to

I. Exact
circle division by five — how to draw the perfect five point star "Give
me a ring and I will make it sing"
II. What
Natural (whole) numbers divide a circle exactly? Meet
the perfect all-star families  
III. Construct
the real and the virtual shapes — and take them to 3D
 

Geometric
construction of the pentagram, pentacle, pentagon, and
A
five pointed star just for kids. If you can tell time you can sketch this
the five pointed star — and spice it up here and there with three kinds of
and other stars by hand. Oh, use the free template below at first.
ten pointed stars

How
to

sketch
a five pointed star on a clock template, for kids [yes, pick a better shade
of pink]. Tilt and rotate and double them
draw
stars of pentagrams and pentagons using a compass and straightedge (two
geometric methods)
construct
a pentacle directly inside your own circle or with your
own sides length
(point-to-point dimension). What you pick — large or small — will be a rational
and therefore an exact measure
tell
the diff between a pentacle and a pentagram and why there are several
pentacles
determine
the inside and outside angles of a pentagram
find
the golden proportions that are inherent in a penta~ star and grow them, too
make
a five-point star indirectly via pentagon tiling — and vice versa
create
fancy
five pointed stars plus a ten pointed hyperstar from a half-square
rectangle (in a new tab)
double
a pentagon in one circle for a decagon
get
the only harmonious ten pointed star of a decagram by always skipping 6
points
design
5 point stars as art forms — inherit the energies if you stick to nature
combine
the up and down pointing pentacles into a brand new hyperstar.
On five
circles. You'll be in the micro but this is huge

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 1/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to

What
does it mean if a pentagram is

encircled once or twice — a star is on a single circle or in-between of two

concentric circles
built
from interlocking rings
taken
as a shape of a human body
upside
down. Devil's in details

Symmetry in a five pointed star — there are several kinds of symmetry and .. ..

A perfect three
pointed star can be had on a circle or semicircle —
and it's doubled for a regular six-point star or a hexagon already. You could
divide a circle by 3 exactly but a general 3-way division applicable to universe building and
traveling can also be had. Hexagon and hexagram stars are behind viruses.

A perfect square is a four pointed star

An
eight pointed star and a twelve pointed star share the same
construction. Both stars are perfect and both take you beyond counting as I'm
the author of the illustration above but this one is freed from copyright. (With
well the Chrome browser you can drag-and-drop this illustration onto your desktop as the .gif file.)

16 and 24 pointed stars also share the same construction. Just

as the Have
a look at some pics from the stone circle at Avebury in Wiltshire,
UK.
eight and 12 pointed stars, they are in the 3:2 musical ratio and because the
Draw
a star, any perfect star. Can you see how you could lay out and sketch several
growth of stars in this ratio is unbounded we have a separate page on that (in a new tab)
stars using but one construct from the clock's minutes? You probably haven't
How
many perfect stars can you make with geometry? With arithmetic? Number heard the word 'a construct,' but a template is usually just for tracing and copying.
36 is (abundantly) divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 – yet, you cannot make a perfect 36 Can you join the points by skipping some? Odd and even number of points makes a
pointed star big difference. Here are the from-the-ground-up geometric constructions of eight
and 16 point stars of a compass rose.
Geometry
vs. Arithmetic is a very old topic, very unresolved, and very relevant;
and [Now,
can you imagine making ALL perfect polygons and stars in the above 60 pt construct? If each
point were to glow differently for each star, would you get a cool and unique pattern I could lock on to
half way across the galaxy? Oh, you make it glow by having each point a semiconductor junction, similar
Numbers
are not just symbols. In a circle they make 1)
stars on paper and 2) to an LED. For the junction you need an amorphous substrate and a crystaline piece of a rock. Because
atoms in space you want to power up the whole circle, your power source is a bit more than just a single lay line.
Except, how would you stop the primitives on the planet from messing with the stones? Yeah, it is all
A comment on a seven pointed star (heptagon). Hit a snag in a circle, but .. sacred feminine kind of stuff. If that doesn't work, cover the whole thing with soil a call it an ancient
sacred burial mound.]

Pentagon
Pyramid. Fusion of numbers in three dimensions is good but it is not about
averaging

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 2/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to

The
four sided Great Pyramid construction is via the golden proportion and has its own
page (in a new tab)

Intro Stars are pretty and circles are everywhere, yet there is but slowly growing
Historically,
geometric drawing of a pentagram star was considered a secret. One
can appreciate understanding of stars and circles. (This is not the case in China, for the Taoist
keeping the "formula" and directions secret because the construction of a five-point star is not movement and Taoist philosophy can be said to issue from a circle.) A circle gap exists
obvious even if you worked in geometry for some time. Yet, if you could draw the perfect star not because we've lost our compass or a desire to admire crop circles, but it is because
only through geometry, the secrecy takes on extra dimensions. To draw a (regular) pentagon, the a circle is frowned upon by the Catholic Church and because the reductionists of the
segment must be exactly one fifth going around the circle. 20th Century lost the link to the source of a 0D point. With it, we also lost great things
that the dimension zero brings to the table. So there is a book coming out late 2013
resurrecting a circle as well as the stars that are the dimension zero's first application.
Oh, 99% of all moving energy in the universe is in spin and orbits. Not only that. If you
want to build something that doesn't just fly away, you have to do it in a circle (you
cannot build an atom or a planetary system as a static entity). Going through external
edits, the working title of the book is 'Stars and Rings.'

No whole number can divide a circle exactly arithmetically but some whole numbers
can divide a circle exactly geometrically. This is the first differentiator between geometry Five pointed star in a circle
and arithmetic. When it comes to dividing a circle's circumference (or area) with a straightedge There are three sources – and
therefore more than one meaning – of the five pointed
and compass, we always strive for the exact division. The perfection is not about some quirky star. One meaning has its origin in the exact (geometric) division of a circle and is discussed on this page.
It is a fairly complex though rewarding topic that leads to the symbolism of a star issuing from a single
obsessions of ancient Greeks and today's teachers, however. If we finish our assignment in a circle. Another root comes from two orbits (hence two concentric circles/rings) of Venus and Earth, and is
finite number of steps and achieve an exact division, we would then claim executability and discussed and traced there.
(Venus, while most prominent through the five pointed star, is also associated
creation of such structures could be implemented in nature. Computer's arithmetic gives us with the number eight and the meaning of the diagonal.) The third source of the five pointed star calls on
precise — but not exact — answers when working with incommensurable (irrational and non-concentric yet interlocking rings {Dec 19, 2009}.
The separation of the circles is in the golden proportion
transcendental) numbers, but the geometric way can be exact and have much utility just and this new five pointed and unique hyperstar construction has its own bookmark on the golden
proportion page.

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 3/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
because of that. We will apply the division of a circle in the atomic construction below.
Yes, the
This brings us to the diff between the sign/drawing of a pentagram and
a
exact construction is about the (exact) conservation of energy.

If
the length of a circle's straight segment (cord) is exact, then the segment's length is pentacle .
A pentagram is a five pointed star drawn with five straight and unbroken lines, aka the
unambiguous and can be expressed as a finite number. A finite number is also a rational
number. If the cord's length were an irrational number then such number's sub-unity portion Pythagorean pentalpha. A pentacle has a circle(s) around the star. Yet, these are but technical differences.
(mantissa) is infinite and we could not agree on its exact length — but we could agree on the There are three separate origins associated with a pentagram and you may want to show a pentacle to
point out the root. In other words, a pentagram always issues from orbits/orbitals/circles/rings/rotation and
exact distance between the two end points because the two end points can be constructed there are three separate ways to do so, as follows:
exactly geometrically. Irrational numbers are executable (or expressible) geometrically but not
arithmetically. This is the second differentiator between geometry and arithmetic. You might 1)
A single circle around the star makes it the classical or atomic
pentacle that comes from atomic
skip on the diff between length and distance right now — later you may avail to the explanation construction, and a single circle shows the standing wave around the nucleus -- the orbitals. Pagan-
and construction of the incommensurable
numbers (irrationals and transcendentals). wise the classical pentacle stands for earth and if you think of it as 'materia' (from Latin), it's a close
match to 'atomic.'
Instructions
on geometric division of a circle into five equal and exact parts — in five  2)
Two concentric circles around the star make it the cosmic or planetary
pentacle and the
steps: two circles are the orbits of Venus and Earth (can be computed via modulo math from the
clockwise 8:5 orbit ratio and in the illustration on left the orbits are to scale). Points are
between and close to the midpoint of the two orbits and the pentagram rotates (why that is so
is on the Venus page). For Pagans, the double circle around the star is about 'drawing down
the Goddess,' and the circle diameters are calculated along with point sequencing on the
Venus page. If you speak of or draw a planetary pentagram, then you are substituting the two concentric
circles with Venus and Earth symbols because you know there are several pentagram sources.

 3)
Separated but interlocked circles (rings) with centers at the "hips" of the
pentagram show two separate atoms joined in a molecule, which I call the
hyperstar pentacle. This is new and I don't presently know of anybody applying
the hyperstar pentacle. Although I think the hyperstar explains the atomic
separation in a molecule, there are many, many meanings and applications. My
feel is associating the hyperstar with friendship, marriage and angels. I like using
it in Tai Chi and here is an
example. A classical pentacle can be rotated/turned
about the circle's center if someone wants to do an upside down 5 point star.
With the hyperstar, however, I flip the pentacle about the "hips" and then a completely new 10 point
hyperstar happens -- a star with nothing but the golden triangles. See below. [Flipping something about an
axis is a feminine operation.]

The abundance of the golden proportions associated with all penta~ constructions
deserves an analysis of its own. Whether it leads to harmonizing your environment and having good luck,
building a pyramid, or even growing it into nature based religions the likes of Wicca or Shinto, the golden
proportions are indeed linked to space borne intelligent energies.

Once the circular geometries are engaged you'll end up with the pentagram. It is then
okay to draw just the pentagram but you want to draw the various pentacles if you want to show where the
pentagram is coming from. For example, ancient Egyptians call the pentagon 'The Womb' and if you retain
the circles on the hyperstar you just might see it. Okay guys, another story has Isis looking for Osiris' parts.
She found all except the phallus, which was eaten by a fish. Strange story. Well, if you retain the circles you
just might see a fish doing its thing. [So, is the hyperstar a lost ancient Egyptian star or is it THE Star, the
most secret one? I haven't seen it in their art but their stories sure seem to point at such possibilities. Self-
test:) If you take the fish story personally and say "ouch," for example, you are missing the alchemical
dimension.]

Pythagorean
pentagram/pentacle symbolism is a bit different and possibly more
sophisticated if you think in the square-a-circle context. The pentagram is encircled once and
then a second ring is added as a piece of jewelry. The second ring is then at the right angle
to the first. (The illustration is from Secret Teaching by Manly Hall.)

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 4/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
 
Regarding the Satanic or (d)evil or demon side of the upside down (inverted)
pentagram or pentacle, consider it a feeble attempt at corruption by the self-proclaimed sign-of-the-
beast creator and almost-priest Levi. You want to know where corruption comes from and then you are in
position to overcome it. In
this case the upside down pentagram could issue from natural rotation of the
Earth-Venus cosmic/planetary
pentacle in the solar plane -- with the sun in the center -- and then the
satanic notion loses its meaning once you appreciate that the cosmic pentacle's rotation does not stop and
there is no 'up' and 'down' of the solar plane to begin with, just as you cannot tell if the whole coin on the
right having odd (point, "sun")
symmetry is up or down. (Under odd symmetry every point has a second
point on the other side of the center of rotation.) If you want to unambiguously show the star's point-up or
point-down placement on a coin, you have to place the star next to a non-symmetrical reference such as an
animal (or introduce the even/mirror symmetry, which is the case in nature). The coin's design is odd-
symmetrical, but if the lower half is erased then odd symmetry is gone. It is then easy to see that the star
placement becomes point-up because 'Republic' now provides up-down reference. So you can appreciate
that "up side down" is not a given under odd symmetry alone because when your reference is but a point
(such as the Sun in the center), you could see the star one way looking from the center and the opposite
way looking into the center.

Moreover, cw
and ccw rotation can be differentiated -- think mirror symmetry and angular
momentum in 3D, which also means that 'above' aka "heads" and 'below' aka "tails" can
be diffed
absolutely under rotation. Geometric stars' origin is from orbits (macro) or orbitals (micro). Micro includes
both the atomic and/or molecular (valence)
orbitals. This means that the stars issue
from odd [masculine] symmetry. Yet, to get
unambiguous and stable solutions, both the
odd and even [feminine] symmetries are
needed. Ancient Egyptians include a
horizontal bar with their oval cartouche just
for that reason, and the bar -- which is the
axis of the even symmetry [it is not "the
horizon"] -- is very explicitly tied to the oval.
Now, I am extending it past the Pharaohs'
cartouche, and there are more practical and
new examples in the 5 and 10 point
hyperstars below and, of course, the
Golden Eye.

When it comes to the androgynous nature of the beast

(Levi's beast has feminine and masculine attributes as well as a point-
down pentacle on its forehead), consider that masculine-feminine cannot be merged because they each
issue from different and unique symmetries. Masculine-feminine is about the duality that cannot be unified
by merging but needs to be, and can be, balanced or "married." (Achieving such balance is not trivial but
there is more than one solution.) In essence, the "evil" side arises from conflicts that ignore nature's duality,
and one of the gateways to its understanding is to ask, 'Why and how is the human brain separated
and
joined at the corpus callosum?' Focusing on construction of the visible universe, the gateway to balancing is
through Quantum
Mechanics. Oh, if you don't like the status quo get into vortex and free energy.

Construction (continued): Overlaying

two opposing hyperstar pentacles,
the up-
If
you want to construct the penta~ with a circle radius of your choice,
point A is one unit and-down points
distance (one-half of the radius) away from origin O. from the two
pentacles make a
When
you divide a circle into exact fifths along the periphery you now have the template and: ten-pointed
hyperstar, which is
Finish
the pentagon by connecting every neighboring point and erase the circle. Inscribe not a decagon nor a
it counterclockwise if you want to be disharmonious (ratio 9:5), clockwise if harmonious hexagon, either
(6:5). (Cw and ccw makes a big difference — think enhanced modulo math. Ccw is acw regular or not -- yep, not
concave and not convex -- and definitely
for the Brits.) not for the Wiki trivia chasers. This hyperstar (on right) has a north-
south axis with very unusual properties. The axis can become absolute under spin and then the star
or symbolically acquires a touch of Tartaros (or Tartarus) -- but, as a Pythagorean you know what the axial
post/pole is about. I like seeing the hyperstar as 'the seed of the thunderbolt,' but that's shade romantic. Did
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 5/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
Make
the pentacle by connecting every other (second) point. If you do it counter- you notice all triangles on the hyperstar are golden?
clockwise, you will be doing it in the 8:5 ratio, which is harmonious, and you should not
have a problem with that once you understand that the underlying pattern mechanics are In the case of the classical pentacle, the upside down notion also has no meaning
because the five-fold atomic orbital is symmetrical about the atomic core and is free to rotate without
clockwise — it's on the Venus page.
appreciable symbolism. (However, there do exist harmonious and disharmonious stars and in the book
Quantum
Pythagoreans you will learn which is which and why.)
Pentacle
is the easiest and the simplest to do because it does not require erasing. Does
it mean it is the most fundamental? A
human body has a close resemblance to a five
pointed star. Indeed,
Tai Chi makes a mere resemblance
Complete
the pentagram from pentacle by erasing the circle into a remarkable art, including the Martial art. The upside
down star is not conventional ("not normal") once you link a
Make
the five pointed star from pentagram by erasing the inside (smaller, human body to the five pointed star. There is then a human
upside down) pentagon. Also see pentagon tiling, further on mental aspect to an inverted star and the Venus page has a
bookmark on
that. However, if you place energy importance
first (and you should) then the upside down aspect is about
Unit
distance energy while the upside down body is a mental and positive
The
unit distance u is the shortest distance used in construction of a particular star. All other construct in the service and manipulation of energy.
parameters (radius/radii, cord) are then calculated in terms of u. This is new {Sep 2012}.
All
formulas for stars should be computed from the unit distance and not from, say, a radius How do you make your
own pentacle or pentagram? Buy or make is okay but to have your own you have
because there are star constructions that use several circles. In our example, the equation for to have it in your mind. And add a cw pentagon, too. [Feeling better?] Here is also a secret for the 21st
century: You must know how to make the star geometrically and then -- by making the same body
the length of the cord c in the above construction comes from two Pythagorean relations and is movements -- you will also attract beneficial (golden proportion) energies in the circular geometry that will
quite involved: stay with you. Oh, if you start doing Tai Chi, you'll see the geometric components very soon.

If you wish to superimpose/overlay/map a human body onto a five pointed star,

the five
points of the inside pentagon are the major reference points. The top two points are at the shoulder-neck
but
for the five point hyperstar transitions, just as you'd guess. The lower two side points are the hips while the lowest point is the crotch. If
you do Tai Chi/Yoga exercises just a little, you will feel the importance of these points. As much as I find
 cord
c = 2u. occult interesting, the "occult" human body-onto-star overlay seems forced and this leads me to suspect the
occultists do not exercise much. As you get more into mind-body-circle-star-energy interlocks, you'll jump
In
either case, you can now substitute any distance for u and get the measures of the rest of
star's parameters. There is more to this. Geometrically, the square root of five, for example,
can be of any length and this length issues from the unit distance used in the construction of
the SQRT(5). When working the pyramid you first have to find the unit distance before making or sail right into alchemy
sense of the rest of the (micro and/or macro) proportions.

Polygons
and stars
The
~gon identifies the point connections that go straight from one point to the nearest next
point on
a single circle — polygon in general. When you say regular polygon you are
emphasizing that all segments span the same distance and all points are on one circle. Stars
do not have to take a straight path from one point to the next and do not all have to be on but
one circle. The star's points could be connected by a curve or a kink line or the connections .
You cannot power into alchemy but you can turn alchemy (Tai Chi
just skip one or more points.

As
you go around the center from one point to the next, you might keep turning in but one
direction and then the star is said to be convex. Regular polygons are always convex.
Sometimes
the points move inbound and out, particularly with or ancient Egyptian versions) into personal power, both logical and physical. There is the Buddhist view,
multiple circles holding the points, and you keep turning left and
right when moving from point to point. In such case the star is said
to be concave. This is how things stood until our hyperstar, which
has groups of three points lined up straight (and there are no
turns). The hyperstar is discussed in the right column. The
hyperstar is not regular.

All
points of all regular stars and polygons are on a circle and are
equally -- that is evenly, and exactly spaced going around the

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 6/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
circle. The best way of seeing it is that they have the exact fraction of a circle between them. too. Ever seen an angel?
However, only some stars are constructible exactly — see Perfect
Families. As to the actual
angles between points — see below, for these angles could be irrational numbers. (For now,
ask yourself if a protractor can give you any irrational angle.)

Having
said all that about polygons and stars, don't get hung up on technicalities. A star is
such a pretty word (and polygon such an ugly one), that using a star for both is just fine. Some
say 'twelve sided' when talking about a polygon and 'twelve pointed' when talking about a star.
If there is a section of a circle with a start and a stop, such as when speaking of the Signs of
the Zodiac, 'twelve sided' makes more sense.

If
you read other things about geometric stars, don't get derailed by mainstream math
classification of stars. Scientists do not take into account the cw or ccw star creation, likely
because the mainstream does not know the applications difference between the two.
(Harmony-disharmony enters here but there is more to it besides cw or ccw.) Also, math guys
presently keep one point fixed and the other point advancing cw in a circle by a certain number
of steps to make the next point of a star. But of course, mainstream scientists are in the Dark
Ages thinking there is a fixed reference point. The Quantum
Pythagoreans book gives all
planets orbiting frequencies from which the stars are made and, gee, the Earth is orbiting while
the cw or ccw point-to-point trace arises mathematically from that. Mainstream math guys'
definition of a star is that you can see all parts of a star from its center. This is a great example
of a definition of arm chair convenience because the Venus-Earth interplay makes a cool The
book you will thoroughly enjoy
curlicue between points of a five pointed pentacle star and this does not match the scientists'
definition of a star — so here is ours. QUANTUM
PYTHAGOREANS

Harmony is talked about ever since antiquity but it is this

Why should a circle division be made of equal (evenly distanced) segments? There is book that actually allows you to predict whether any two
nothing wrong with unequal lengths if that's your fancy and there could be a really good tones will be harmonious. Yes, the clockwise or
reason with a heptagon (see below). However, an electron's wavelength is proportional to the counterclocwise rotation can be determined and that is the
electron's energy and if several wavelengths of one electron were to fit (were to close) one (of the two) harmony components that was hidden until
around the nucleus then they have to do so in whole multiples of the same distance. It's now.
about the numbers (in a circle).
It is about the perfection of geometric stars and the waves
There
are many geometric ways of constructing pentagon or pentagram patterns and symbols. that go with it.
The construction presented here has the length of the side of the pentagon c the
incommensurable (irrational) distance — that is, the measure of the side's distance is More
..
composed of an infinite number of digits (that do not repeat individually or as a group). Other
constructions make the side c a rational distance, which is better suited for the Great
Pyramid's purposes. In the pyramid, one half of the side of the base is (must be) a rational unit
of measure, for such measure is executable
and can become. (For transcendentals you may
have to put a kink in that.) The connection between the five sided pentagon/pentagram and the
four sided Great Pyramid is through the golden
proportion, a subject that lets you understand
how to draw and construct the Great Pyramid, and include the pinch on its side.

Angles in a five pointed

star and how they relate to the golden proportion The
radius measure of 2 (diameter of 4) in our pentagonal construction on the left is the outcome of
using the shortest applied distance as the unit 1. This is not because you couldn't divide by two (you can -- and
Determination
of pentagram's angles is easy — on the work with ½ as the distance OA, for example), but if you construct other structures such as the the Great
Pyramid with the shortest distance as the unit 1, you will always be in sync with your numbers from one
interior or the exterior. First, if (any) two angles have structure to the next. If you want to look at it metaphysically, each number has its own personality and you
their arms intersecting at 90 degrees then the two want to keep track. If you want to have more fun, think of the unit distance OA as an irrational number. Even
angles are the same. Euclid did not think of the number 1 as just a counting number.

The central (Egyptian) star below has 360/5=72 degrees between its arms. Because the arms On the political side, particularly in the association with Communist power,
you want to be
(rays, spikes) of this star are at right angles to other angles then such angles are also 72 cognizant that the five pointed star issues from orbits and the star is always a 2D entity made from 1D

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 7/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
degrees. You will get to 108º
angle inside the pentagon constructs. Making the star into a 3D star (the likes of the Kremlin) points to the lack of understanding on the
with the subtraction of the 72º angle from 180º (from a root of the star's creation. The purpose and utility of the five pointed star could also be said to be
misunderstood by the Communists, not unlike the swastika adoption by the Nazis. [If the Nazi technology
straight line). You will note two special triangles on the was as advanced in the flying saucer technology as is rumored then the swastika would not be far off.] For
pentagram when making design extensions to the sides the time being I'm not doing full 2D (area) or 3D red stars until the bloody aspects dissipate -- oh, about a
(below). One has the interior angles of 72, 72, and 36 hundred years, considering China. These stars are fancies anyway.
degrees while the second one's angles are 36, 36, and
108 degrees. Both of these triangles are golden Actually, Darwin started the whole mess with his 'strongest survive' evolution simplification, and it
because their sides are in the golden proportion. There was the opportunism of Communists and Fascists who took in the reduction and used it literally. (There were
alternatives available at Darwin's time but Mendel was pushed aside for the critical 15 years and at Mendel's
are many other golden proportions on the pentagram
rediscovery the industrial revolution was in full swing. Book review: The
Monk in The Garden.)
but these two kinds of triangles are important in the
micro (atomic) domain, particularly as related to orbital What to look for. People bent on power will promote and support the following:
jumps.
  1. Nature
is on our side
Best represented by Dawkins' The Selfish Gene, the idea is that being loaded with money is natural (you
guessed it, it's Gates' favorite). A virus is selfish, a gene is not. In the UK the Oxford U nicely masks its
ignorance with arrogance. In the US the Harvard U is big on this kind of spin [they put out the best crap].
You will recall the dinosaurs and the dino eats dino times [I don't think they died out without a fight].

2. Running
out of energy
Usually about ("peak") oil, this mentality replaced "Running out of food" from the last century. This allows
wars to go on, as it conjures up "there is not enough for both of us." This is but one example of
reductionism. [If you don't see God, there are plenty of bosses to work under – here and on the other side.]
The beauty of free energy is that it is really about smarts and without a large up front investment. Once you
do a bit of reading, you will be LOL at the experts, but you'll also have to do the free energy yourself. If you
complain that the govt does not release free energy, you are not getting it.

3. Socialized
medicine
The mind job here is to convince you that you need the institutions of state and selected private hospitals
and clinics for you to stay healthy but there is an obligation to pay extra premiums. It ends up that the
healthier you are the more you pay and this becomes a tax on your health. Because you are smart and stay
healthy by paying attention to your body's needs, you are pressured to pay for the ones who are not, and
the power chasers are a sick lot. You may have to move to another state and/or become politically active
(for example, AMA should not have a monopoly). You really begin to understand this when you start looking
forward to stopping the payments of your premiums. You may find out it is the best thing for actually being
healthy. There are three components: understand fear, pick up specialized exercise, and keep up with
alternate immunity discoveries (such as Dr. Jan Raa's) as well as the revival of Raymond
Rife technology.
  Once you understand the fear component, talk openly about the health alternatives should you meet an
In multiples of one tenth of a circle AMA doctor, for the tables might have turned.
All angles internal and external to the pentagram or the five pointed star are in multiples of
1/10 of a circle: from 36º on to 72º, 108º, 144º,
180º 4. Culture
or religion-embedded "values" of guilt, fear, and intolerance
... 324º, 360º. A circle can be divided by 10 exactly Once embedded they can be invoked without explanation (prejudice will not be seen for what it is). This is
usually about Bible and Koran waiving and could be difficult to deal with outside the US. In some cases the
and so all angles in and around a pentagram are fear and/or weakness and/or ignorance "justifies" betrayal [needs to be watched, even self-watched].
exact and perfect. A pentagram, aka pentalpha, is a Betrayal is also a component of power, and power has its own category (power is reversed in the virtual
prominent symbol of the Pythagoreans. It is said the domain and there it is not based on specific might but on infinity). In the Pythagorean and Buddhist traditions
pentagram is good for one's health, and there could the friendship works well. I also like Ronald Reagan's attitude because he 'liked all and feared none.' You
be something to it considering the golden might get hurt but you will have the last word.
proportions that are all over the star. I think it is also
likely the pentagram's prominence is due to having
So
you think you know your numbers and might think it's okay to reduce them to your
an abundance of the number 10 while adding a
liking. But if you construct the Great
Pyramid with the golden numbers and use the shortest distance as the
circular aspect to the many number 10 aspects
of unit 1, you will arrive at the pyramid's base as having the side length of 4.
The base of the Great Pyramid is
the Pythagorean Tetractys. The number 10 is also then 4 times of some unit of measure. So now the pyramid's base periphery (4+4+4+4) and base area (4x4)
fundamental in designs of obelisks, including the carry the same square number 16. You see, if you reduce the numbers and think of the pyramid's base as
Washington Monument. having the unit length of, say, two, the base periphery would have eight units of length but the base area would
be but four (square) units. If you do not reduce the numbers you can think of the number 16 in the context of
acceleration (unit of measure per time squared) and derive the unit of length that is most appropriate for this
Self-test:-) If you think an obelisk is a phallic symbol then you've just begun.
planet [yeah, it's a foot].

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 8/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
The angle of 144º seems obscure (it's on the outside Rational
numbers are
commensurable numbers -- that is, they all have finite or repeating sub-unity
of the star) but it's the only angle you'll need part of a number (mantissa) and all can be expressed as a ratio of two integers. Rational numbers can also be
if you want to draw a pentagram with a called the exact, finite, or absolute numbers because we can write them down and agree on their value. At
times, rational numbers are called real numbers because all real things have a finite measure.
computer program the likes of 'Turtle,'
'Scratch,' or 'Logo.' The program would run Rational
numbers happen when we ratio two integers. All mainstream mathematicians define the
like this (in pseudocode): rational number as the ratio of any two integers. So, a mainstream math guy would say, "Of course the rational
number is a ratio of two integers -- it is defined that way." Yet, you really do not want to be mainstream and
acquire but an encyclopedia knowledge of the world. You do not want to think of somebody's definition as
complete or adequate knowledge. You know that a rational number is a finite number (has a finite or repeating
mantissa) and once it is finite it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers. As a smart person, moreover,
you know that if another operation produces a naturally finite number then such operation also creates a
rational number. The circumference of a circle is a transcendental number. Many of circle's round segments
(arches) are transcendental numbers and their straight cord could be an irrational number -- and both of these
numbers have an infinite mantissa (infinite precision). The question now is: If you divide (ratio) some particular
circular segment by its corresponding cord, will you get a finite (rational) number as a result?

Some
Pythagoreans view the number two as a problem number because it "divides the unity."
Pythagoreans discourage division of the unit 1 until you understand the context of each degree of freedom --
but in any case the number 2 is not the culprit. (The number 2 is in the denominator of the golden ratio and
Pen Down [start] there it should stay as the number 2.) As you get familiar with this site the sub-unity will become applicable to
Repeat 5 [times] atomic orbitals and hence the number 1 is the Great Divide between the macro-cosmic and micro-atomic. [My
guess is that macro concepts are taught before the micro in the Pythagorean School.]
  Move 100 pixels [forward]
  Turn 144 [degrees]
Pen Up [done]
Tetractys of Pythagoras deals with the organization of matter, among other things. What makes
you a Pythagorean? Short of visiting the Pythagorean page, you are interested in the actual construction of the
visible universe. As a Pythagorean you want to know why some stars are constructible exactly and muse at
If these computer instructions do not mean much to you, you are doing well. First you want to the people who draw stars without regard to their actualization. Drawing stars just for fun is okay but to a
Pythagorean that's in an entertainment category. The ~Wiki~ compilations about stars are trivia, which quickly
create the geometric foundation — yes, in your mind, before resorting to a computer. become distracting as well. Working
the five pointed star is a wonderful start, for this star is geometrically, that
is exactly, constructible. Constructing the real universe is, moreover, the greatest show there is. Construction
The
golden proportion consists of two numbers that at times relate through a ratio, in which and deconstruction of atoms are similar endeavors -- and you have no need for a hammer to construct or
deconstruct something. The forces therein can add up in controlled fashion, too. There are dozens of
case we speak of the golden ratio. The
two golden numbers consist of one irrational number a that is (1 + philosophers and gurus talking about the omniscient nonlocal instant infinity of the conscious universe, but to a
SQRT(5))
and one rational number b that is 2 and, because these two numbers may relate to each other through Pythagorean this is but one half of the show: You still have to put all that knowledge to work. Yes, we have
multiplication or division or addition or subtraction or.., they should not be reduced into a single number. Reduction pictures. The upside down star has no negative meaning in the micro domain. There are in fact several stars
into a single number severely limits the application of the golden
proportion and that is one reason scientists like nested inside the larger stars because there are many orbit jump opportunities with each pair of orbitals. Yes
to reduce it as the Phi [scientists have reductionist tendencies – perhaps not a disease but it could be a handicap]. again, ALL triangles are golden.
Reduction into one number hides other relationships the two golden numbers might have.
Oftentimes we think of star patterns only when tiling in 2D or building the Platonic solids
The golden spiral (in 3D). But the patterns we encounter in the micro are usually made with overlapping
Golden spiraling happens naturally in 2D or 3D as you observe the golden proportions and stars and that makes nifty art shapes as well. The overlap comes from the inclusiveness
figure out how you could grow them. Fancy math will give you a smooth spiral but if you stick of waves.
to the golden proportion you will be going in discrete steps. (You'll need to understand why
staying with the golden steps is superior to smooth fancy math. It has nothing to do with On
July 17, 1991 at Barbury Castle there appeared a crop circle named the Tetrahedron
"efficient packing of seeds/objects," and you just might see the quantum effects on the macro (a triangular pyramid). For its 20th anniversary we have a summary-update.
scale.) Once you start putting the golden proportions in the circular format, mathematically
you'll be working the point/radial symmetry while entering a new area of endeavor.

Pentagonal tiling
Also known in general as tessellations, doing it in 5-fold rotational symmetry is favorite of
Dürer, Kepler, Penrose.. .. All
pieces that make up sets for the five-fold 2D tiling have their
angles in multiples of 1/10 of a circle {July
2011}. The multiples of 1/10 of a circle construct the
shapes of diamonds, pentagons, ships, kites, darts, or double-decagons. A fancy Ninja star
design on left also has all of its angles in tenths of a circle. The hyperstar goes even further

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 9/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
using an exact division of a circle while providing
constructs for orbital jumps.

There is yet another (and last) golden triangle

and that one does not appear on a pentagram. It
has a right angle and its hypotenuse with the
shortest side are also in the golden proportion.
This triangle is one-half of the Great Pyramid
going across the mid face and into the center of
the base. You can see it below on our Golden
Eye design.

Pentagon Dimension Priority: Diameter

Dim or Point-to-point Length Dim
There is a dual approach to a geometric
pentagon star construction. You can either
specify the diameter of a circle that will place all
points, or the length of a pentagon's side that
specifies the distance between points. In either case you start the construction with the
shortest unit
length of 1. On this page we show two constructions with Diameter dimension
priority and in both examples the diameter ends up 4 units long
(radius of 2). This means you
can construct a star with a circle diameter of your choice because there is the exact 1:4 Here
is a poster for a Graphics show I had in
relationship (scale) between the unit length you started with and the diameter of the Prague (where I teach now) in February
pentagon's circle. In the case of a point-to-point Length dimension priority, or side Length 2013.
priority, you start the golden proportion construction with the unit length of 1. When finished,
Large-print format is becoming affordable.
the pentagon will scale to the side length of 2. Pentagon construction with side
Length priority With a careful equipment selection, one can
has the exact side of your choice and is on the golden proportion page. avail to a high quality original poster that is
not only less than the price of a
reproduction, but is good for your health as
A circle has many positive connotations. What would be the idea of dividing it? Once
you know well.
what numbers can divide a circle, you can then build a circle. Not [yet] from real things such as wood or metal but
from waves. It turns out that the waves must have a particular wavelength count (a particular multiple of particular
energies) before these waves are able to close in a circle -- and thus be symmetrical about a point. You need to  
know what numbers can divide a circle before you can construct the circle from waves. You might think this is
something witches do, and you would be right, but an electron is a wave that wraps around the nucleus, too. Just about ready (second picture).

There is (always) a bit more to this. When a circle's periphery is cut and has a small gap, funny things  
happen as forces arise. One could call this a circle corruption and in a way it is. Yet the forces that arise are not
corrupting, for they attempt to close the circle and .. (think free energy).  

The making of a circle is also about taking a step from 1D to 2D. There, you will find the friendly  
transcendental number Pi.
To round it off, you may want to learn more about the squaring
of a circle, for it is about
the straight and curving geometries. We did not forget the ancient Egyptians and use the example of the five
pointed star as one of the steps in working the circle and the square. The golden proportion and Pi get very close
to each other. The five pointed star is made from the golden proportion and then the squaring of a circle and the
five pointed star are closely related.

Ah, geometry
Not everybody likes geometry. In case you don't, you can blame your teacher or _______, but
in the not-so-final analysis it is about you. Geometry is about movement and placement in
space, from an atom in your body to your ship as a whole. Lots of geometry is in a plane and
you have a good argument if you say your head is not flat. So let me cut to the chase. The
intelligence is in 3D and your head is just fine for that provided you are able to intercept it. Lots
of free energy is in 2D and it can be harnessed there once you figure out how to relate 3D to
Consider the existence of the even and odd symmetries as the point of departure
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 10/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
2D. Oh, to relate 1D to 2D you'll get into the squaring of a circle, which is something you want between the Pythagorean and Aristotelian physics. Pythagoreans
continue basing new concepts
to do if you'd like to make atoms. (Light is in 1D and energy of an atomic electron cannot be in on numbers and then the even aka twofold symmetry issues from and relates to the number two (and the
1D — it would leave the atom.) The linear movement is in 1D while the atom and gravitation feminine). Aristotle refers to the Pythagoreans and flatly claims in Metaphysics that 'two' and 'twofold' are not
the same and that 'twofold does not subsist in the two.' (Of course) the two and twofold are not the same but
need 0D for spin. Your challenge, desire, need, or necessity is to understand and work the the number two spawns the even symmetry as two-points-make-axis construct and then the number two is not
Pythagorean tetra(ctys) of 0D through 3D because that is how the universe is built and you just a counting number.
want to continue to be a nifty and smart participant in it.
If Aristotle rejects the Pythagorean 'number two is behind even symmetry,' does
he propose
Symmetry
in a five pointed star something better or different? It does not seem so, and this could be a nice example of ancient Greek
Symmetry has appeal. It makes things look nice but it could be difficult to move beyond that. debunking. Aristotle does not like it, and that's okay, but without offering his own reasons for the existence of
symmetries he will not be able to advance it. Sure enough, we don't hear from Aristotle on symmetries.
There are similarities with reflections in a mirror — or refractions through a focus of a lens. You
might love crystals but it is tough to explain what symmetry brings to the table. Aristotle could Some
star constructions speak of fixed length sticks, which at first glance can construct
not apply numbers beyond counting and it was then easier for him to stick to generalities any size polygons. Here is where the executability
of angles comes up. In space, the irrational angle is
('nature abhors a vacuum,' 'prime mover') and even poke fun at Pythagoreans. constructible only approximately and only
some angles will be actualized – think snowflake formation. Also,
we can calculate the points of a polygon along a circle but using sticks that have finite (rational) and equal
There are two kinds of symmetries: even and odd. The even symmetry duplicates things about lengths for the cords will not always fit in such points. In fact, a not-so-difficult case can be made that geometry
the (usually vertical) axis while the odd symmetry duplicates things by half-circle rotation about takes precedence (has priority) over arithmetic. [If you are a scientist, you may think of Emmy Noether who
a point at the origin, which is the center of the circle used to make the star. Symmetries issue ignored the nature's beauty of snowflakes and made simplifying assumptions about space that proved the
'ignorance is bliss' postulate – for in her world everything is reduced and snowflakes and crystals don't exist.]
from geometry (and geometry issues from numbers). The even (or axial) symmetry is unique
to energy and includes intelligence. Esoterically it is the head of the Sphinx while the empty You
can calculate the area of any polygon by taking the area of the triangle and
space between the Sphinx' front paws is the (virtual) line of the axis of the even symmetry. The multiplying by the number of sides. When
working the area of a circle or a polygon, the center
point is
odd (or point) symmetry is unique to charge and matter. The even symmetry is inclusive while (becomes) excluded. (If you are metaphysically inclined, think Isis looking for all parts.) In your Pythagorean
the odd symmetry is exclusive. Self-test:-) If you think erecting a physical object between the mind, you need to link the area to its physics application. For example, a physical property that is proportional
Sphinx front paws is corruptive, you are doing well. to radius squared is then also proportional to the area, which gives merit to area calculations. This is bigger
than it seems. You are not just sweating your teacher's assignments -- you are actually working the physics
A five pointed star, point up or down, has even symmetry but no odd symmetry. You could also entities if you know what they are.
have heard of 'rotational' symmetry. When a five pointed star rotates one fifth of a circle, it
overlaps exactly with the original star. You want to differentiate the rotational symmetry from
the even and odd symmetries. Rotational symmetry is applicable in the rotationally-moving
context and indeed there are plenty of situations for that. I like to call the even and odd
symmetries the placement symmetries while the rotational symmetry is one of the movement
symmetries. Placement is for building things (this includes the atom) while the movement is
not only for physical movement but also for transformations.

Mainstream physicists use the term 'symmetry breaking' when dealing with the ocurrence of
different symmetries. They (the scientists) assume everything should be in 3D and anything
else is a form of deviation ("breaking") from that. This is very stupid. The fundamental thing to
look for is computability. If the system is computable, it will happen. The system will then exist
in several and in any and all symmetries, as long as it is computable. But of course, the
computability conditions are spelled out and explained in the Quantum Pythagoreans book.

This talk about symmetries becomes introductory once you begin to appreciate that the (law of
the) conservation of energy is based on the conservation of symmetries. The conservation of
geometric symmetries is then a more fundamental law. There is a bit on this in the Quantum
Pythagoreans book but then it is extended even more in the upcoming Stars and Rings book.
What? Who needs cables?

One other
Penta~ construction We
have a collection of cool and hot designs inspired by the five-point star. View
This one comes from Yosifusa Hirano of 19th Century Japan. It is elegant and also constructs select
designs -- or visit our
store at Zazzle (.com/Mike_Geo) and see how well you
the pentagon or pentacle on radius 2. could look in a tee, hoodie, long sleeve shirt, or a polo. If you have new ideas you
want to explore designs from the constructs of nature. All our designs come from
nature and center on the golden proportion.

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 11/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to

The angle
of 72 degrees Design on right is called the Adventure of The Red
Sun

If you think the construction of a 72 degree angle

above is special, consider it the exact one fifth of a The Golden Eye.
circle rather than a number with some magical A pentagon and the Great Pyramid are related, but it hadn't been easy to show both
properties. The angle of 72º is 360/5 but the of them relating through the golden proportion. I construct them together using the
number 360 is arbitrary to begin with. Geometric new Golden Eye method in the Quantum Pythagoreans book and now the
one fifth of a circle gives you the exact division of construction is available in color for your shirt or Tshirt as well -- in the Golden Eye
2Pi and you now have the exact division of a design.
transcendental number — something your
computer cannot do. Yes, the arithmetic division of The golden proportion is between the pyramid side and the half-base. The Great
a circle by a whole number (or any rational number) must use the circumference or an area of a Pyramid is shown in a vertical cut through the mid-face. Much detail is on the golden
circle, which is based on the number Pi having an infinite mantissa — and the arithmetic result is numbers page.
never exact because the result has an infinite number of nonrepeating sub-unity digits. The
modified Hirano construction below begins to work the transcendentals in the square-a-circle Energies
context. Visit the proofs page. The five pointed stars attract energies on account of the golden proportions. Because
under rotation the five fold symmetry can be either harmonious or disharmonious,
"All
pentagram angles are
arithmetically
divisible by nine." you want to know which is which (ccw is harmonious on a pentagram, cw is
harmonious on a pentagon) because you really cannot hide under a rock and hope
"What?" for the best. Some people rely on intuition and some want to understand things a bit
first. Either way, I wish this site and the book will do it for you.
"Or by four."
So, what's the big deal if the number 360 (degrees in a circle) is no big deal? If you line up all
angles from the pentagram: 36, 72, 108, 144, etc. and sum their individual digits you will always
get 9. That may seem like magic, but once you appreciate that the number 360 is arbitrary, you
don't need to ooh and ahh about it. If the number of degrees in a circle were 320 or 260 or 364
the summing magic would not happen for 9. The circumference of a circle is 2Pi and putting in a
number to stand for degrees is purely a practical consideration. In the case of 360, this number is
4x9x10 and now, because the angles of a pentagram are in tenths of a circle, the number that is
left is a multiple of 9 (and 4) and so it will be always divisible by 9 (or 4). All numbers divisible by
9 have their digits sum up to 9 (modulo 9 — thank you, Gauss). So, always work with fractions of
a circle (or fractions of 2Pi) even if the numerical sub-unity pushes your right brain into infinities.
There is plenty of real magic left in this subject, particularly if you get into the squaring of a circle.

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 12/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to

Two pentagons make a decagon, a regular ten pointed star [I think the mathematical discoveries of construction ratios is what Plato refers to as
A
regular pentagon made with the Hirano method can be used to easily make a regular decagon 'Logistics,' which is thought to be a lost Pythagorean knowledge. In the case of a pentagon
— an exact ten-point star. A pentagon that is made by the exact division of a single circle can be Diameter priority the ratio is with square numbers (1:4) because we go from 1D (unit length) to 2D (circle). The
duplicated 180 degrees out-of-phase (upside down) and decagon results from two pentagons. same ratio of 1:4 holds for the pyramidal construction because one unit of length ends up as four area units of
a pyramid base. For a pentagon point-to-point Length priority, however, the ratio is 1:2 because one length
One pentagon is thus rotated about the center of the circle or, if you prefer, rotated/flipped about becomes another length (1D to 1D) but the construction now must include rotation.
In general, there is a
the horizontal axis. rotational aspect in the Pythagorean Theorem even though the arithmetic of the Theorem does not capture it (it
uses squares). Logically, any line (any 1D distance) inherently contains a direction and when staying in 1D a
However, a regular ten pointed star that is a regular decagon is not a hyperstar. (Hyperstar is change in direction amounts to rotation. Squares (area, 2D) do not contain a static direction but they have
discussed in the right column.) While
both stars are created from two regular five pointed stars, a something else.]
decagon is always convex. A hyperstar has some straight segments spanning three points. A
decagon has its points on a single circle. A hyperstar has 8 of its 10 points on two identical Every
time you double something – think octave. Every time you halve something – think node (or
circles separated by the golden ratio parameters. fit) for standing waves. Every time you rotate by 45 degrees – think transformation. Every time you rotate by a
right angle – think.. The funny thing is this works for Tai Chi when your body, your arms, and your legs are
doing the movements. Geometry and movement is about your health too.

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 13/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to

Harmonious ten pointed star Throughout the Hyperflight site I like to make fun of mainstream science. These
folks lower
The star below, if drawn counterclockwise, is classified as a (10+7)/10 star using my method that our understanding and appreciation of nature and their favorite first step is that 'this or that cannot be done or
is (x+y)/x in general {while y is between 1 and x — that is, x>y>=1}.
The
decagram star looks found out.' The best modern example is Einstein and I don't know of any of his concepts that are correct: This
nice — it is unicursal, is regular during construction (advances by the same angle), has parallel includes the special and general relativity theories (stemming from his inability to determine absolute
motion/rest); photonic work function (a photon puts no pressure on a mirror); Brownian motion (molecules
sides and is harmonious. This star skips every six points and is the only harmonious ten vibrate in place); and energy-matter mechanics (not reversible, i.e., nova or supernova). Errors of omission
pointed star in the macro. (Decagon and all other ten-point stars are not harmonious, cw or ccw.) and commission are also applied to corrupt the reality around us. The basic difficulty is that science
The Pythagorean style rationing (really proportioning) method (x+y)/x as well as the popularizers use the right math but apply it to wrong concepts. It may take a while to "get to the bottom of this"
corresponding musical harmony or disharmony is explained in the book, and you'll know why the and what really helps is that equations cannot make wrong concepts right, and therefore are suspect.
proportioning approach presented here is much more useful than what the mainstream puts out.
You noted x and y are integers but if x and y are the golden
numbers then (x+y):x is the golden On this page I said that 'up' and 'down' cannot be distinguished in the solar system under odd
proportion — and enter both the micro and the macro. (Rationing is not commutative because symmetry alone. Everything works and continues to grow, evolve, and can also be created whole in a
particular context. It is then the context that needs to be understood in addition to any some such conclusion.
A/B is not B/A. Proportioning, however, is commutative because A:B is the same as B:A, and The 'up' and 'down' manner of speaking is relevant when the context has a line: things above the line are 'up'
playing two musical notes has the same effect whether you analyze at it as A:B or B:A. (above) and below the line are 'down' (below). However, orbits and orbitals and spin in general have a point
Sometimes I think mainstream math is pathetic, for ignoring waves is the norm.) as its construct of rotational/spinning existence and it is then appropriate to say that when dealing with point
symmetry there is no fixed 'up' or 'down' because there intrinsically is no (fixed) line. The point is that if you
Not done yet understand the context you will understand whether someone's pronouncements are true, not true, or
corruptive. For example, ignoring 0D (a point) as the fourth dimension of freedom -- which provides a
There exists symmetry about one point called the point symmetry (or odd or radial or rotational movement construct just as 1D, 2D, and 3D do -- is corruptive because it does not recognize the spin/orbit that
symmetry) [masculine]. There also exists symmetry about two points called the even symmetry accounts for 99% of the moving energy found in the universe. There are several ways of getting to the truth,
(or axial or twofold or mirror line symmetry) [feminine] — the two points making an axis by which too. Geometry is one. Tarot works nicely and in this case it's The Wheel of Fortune card. Tarot has four suits,
the original image rotates. These two kinds of symmetries are all-pervasive in atomic which stand for .. (your brainwork). You will then be in position to either speak out and/or just do what you
construction where they are called the odd and even wavefunctions. Yes, everything is coming up know is better: Free energy, Martial arts, spiritual medicine, telepathy/RV, superluminal travel, atom/matter
creation -- all, not coincidentally, based on ether scientists deny. Speaking out means that you have enough
numbers. Now, how would you marry these two symmetries? info based on merit and then your statements become less political. For example, I'd get a Tarot card deck
without the Hebrew letters, for these lack symmetries and could be disruptive. (If you know the Hebrew letters

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 14/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
You might have noticed that in the five-fold division were added to Tarot later on, you'll also know it is about corruption.) As you learn how things really work the
of a circle the three points made by a compass' pin misconceptions will release and you become healthier.
are at the corners of a right angle triangle having
After reading a book on the history of the Chinese philosophy that weaves through the Confucian,
sides 1 and 2. (A pin of a compass centers the Taoist, and Buddhist pursuits over 2300 years there, it seems the Chinese never got to the understanding, and
radial symmetry [masculine].) It is no coincidence then the differentiation, of the symmetries. Yet I would not relax too much after this. There are the philosophical
that the Great Pyramid's Grand Gallery has the and religious versions of Taoism and if you stay with the academia's version of philosophy you'll learn next to
vertical height (rise) of 1 and the horizontal length nothing. Once you get to the religious side you will read a lot about circles and spirits and demons, about
of 2 while the Trough is the hypotenuse spanning keeping centered (weighed) in a point and having light crystallized -- but all this is pure alchemy and it takes
some dedication for the ideas to work their way through (just as you would do with the ancient Egyptians).
the distance of SQRT(5).
(This also establishes the
While the Chinese did not push the three philosophies/religions into the objective realm we call science, the
unit length 1 of this pyramid.) Chinese pursuit in the improvement of the individual's mind-body yielded Tai Chi with most significant
implications -- and leaving a formidable gap for "the West." Wang
Fuzhi (b. 1619) gets very close, giving Chi
Is it a coincidence that to define
Pi we need (Qi, Ether) the female-male aspects of Yin-Yang (ancient Egyptian Tefnut-Shu) and then nicely extends this to
distances 1 and 2? coexisting energy-matter duality along with a dynamic balance of the two. Wang Fuzhi is describing a free
electron all right but then its detection and use happens in
a body (yes, yours) rather than in an external and
Is it a coincidence that to construct the golden objective instrument. (Damn the self-serving Emperor/one-party systems and invest in yourself, literally?)
Wang Fuzhi, or anyone after him, does not advance Li (order/construct/distance/"1D") to geometry or
numbers we start with a right angle triangle with symmetries, and this also means the Pythagorean tradition did not make it to China (until recently perhaps).
sides 1 and 2? We can then also say that the Taoist five pointed star of the elements is indigenous to China (could've been
discovered in more than one place) and testifies to the universal power and utility of the five fold division of a
There is more to 5 circle. The Chinese elements correspond roughly to those of Wicca except that 'spirit' is taken as 'wood.' This
seems strange but think of wood as the circles of tree rings, too. This also gives you an idea how "hidden"
It is very easy to get excited about the number 5 Chinese alchemy is. (Note the prominent spiritual link to the trees in the Druid tradition and a very explicit tree
and begin to associate each of the five points with other things. This is a Pythagorean site and related experience of Joan of Arc.) The Taoist movement starts with Lao-tzu's Te-Tao Ching of 500 BCE (or so)
we love the number five but Pythagoreans also know that using numbers for counting is and Te translates as Virtue. I am happy to have named the largest chapter in the Quantum Pythagoreans book
introductory to the power of numbers while correspondences are about the elemental — that is the Virtual Domain (and before reading Te-Tao). The virtual domain is about infinities and there is much to
differentiating, power of numbers. The five discrete elements in Wicca and Tao are fine, yet the explore there -- yes, this is an understatement. (One can also destabilize in John Nash fashion. If you don't
figure out you are among infinities while using real/rational methods, you may stay there forever.) If I were to
visual-geometric imagery based on the Penta~ is about the infinity (irrationality) of the golden
talk in Lao-tzu's puzzling way, the virtual domain Te holds nothing because it has everything (and now you'd
proportions stemming from the square root of five. With the golden numbers you construct many have to figure out the virtual domain Te has everything in the form of knowledge). At times Te translates as
shapes that extend the Penta~ beyond counting. The images are also more than pretty pictures, Power (and knowledge is a close relative of power). Lao-tzu described Tao in the most general way. It was
for the waves in space readily interact with such shapes in a computing relationship and "things only later that the "Tao" symbol arose from that and along with the religious side of Taoism. But of course, the
happen." You do not need to get esoteric to appreciate that energies have preferences for Tao symbol is but the Chinese version of what the infinite Tao is or could be used for, including the label of
'Tao.'
geometric shapes and the golden proportions have a unique predisposition to the operation of
the reciprocal. (Yes, energies make things grow but also think about the nature's way of actually The virtual domain deals with knowledge that is linked by associations. The Western alchemy's condensed
capturing the waves' energies.) So
it is nice virtual language could speak of the philosopher/sorcerer entering the stone only to discover there is no stone.
to recognize the golden shapes around you Bewildered, the philosopher breaks out of the stone and finds the stone the same as before. He cannot break
even though neither the star or the number into the stone and yet he does not have to break up the the stone to reenter it. The philosopher's stone can be
five jump out at you. The meaning could be had -- but not physically. Yikes!
shifted by another application but now it is
Here is s'more on stability via organization.
not hidden. [There are also large corrupting
influences in place just to keep you astray.] So you think you know your numbers metaphysically and feel comfy about the masculine-
What if the Queen's Chamber in the Great feminine stuff. You might be dividing by 2 and think it feminine. Not so. Real cutting is masculine: it makes
Pyramid has its spatial distances in the two halves of an apple, severs an interconnection of a relationship, or spatially reduces a spread out electron
golden proportion? What if the spiral on the (QM).
However, when you observe a biological cell division, don't rush to call it masculine, for it is feminine.
You'll have to get into symmetries to understand this. Meanwhile, don't make the silly mistake of equating
Eye of Horus were made through the golden masculine with a man and feminine with a woman -- unless you want to give up on one half of your brain. Oh,
rectangle or a golden triangle? How can you and think about The One.
visualize the golden
ratio in financial terms?

Analytically attacking all three major pyramids at Giza as one layout can earn you a label or
two, but on this
site Jiri starts with a square and then looks for the golden proportion – and gets very, very
close to the actual measurements. Ready to bury the Pharaohs someplace else?

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 15/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to

Some
basic geometry. From a square angle to a square  

Here is a simple yet powerful construction that

1) Divides any distance exactly in half;

2) Erects the perfect right and square angle (making the Cartesian Coordinates); and
3) Makes a true square using any circle centered at O (at the intercept of horizontal and
vertical axes that are the coordinates). A square is also a four pointed star

Only straightedge and compass are needed. (Straightedge is an unmarked ruler.)

Both arcs (arches) have the same radius.

Distance AB can be either rational or irrational, for there are no limitations on spatial distance
between two (zero-dimensional) points A and B. Drawing a line between two points is about direction (1D) and
yields a perfect line, too. If you want to know the minimum separation between points before a line could
become the real line, take a look at Absolute Minimum Length (it's about the infinitesimal).

If distance AB is irrational, should it be dashed? If so, why?

  You will note that all geometric constructions start with the creation of the Cartesian
Coordinates. Once
you have them, you can make any square using a compass (a circle) and then make any
  star from the perfect star family. A square, then, is inherent in all star constructions.

There
does not appear much we can do with a square. A A square is feminine and a circle is masculine. Some people get into spirituality and claim a circle is
square is pretty, has a lot of symmetries, but that's about feminine because it is "rounded." That is how you can tell a beginner. Symmetries are the key here because
it. But as we go
on, things are going to get interesting they have very high priority -- on par with energy conservation. Ancient Egyptians, Native Americans, and
Chinese have no problem here. Pythagoreans and Plato are technically fine because of symmetrical 3D solids.
once we start to make cubes. Also, as a plain square, two Aristotle would not get into symmetries at all (and his historical contribution ends [should've stayed and die in
circles can be fitted and defined by a square: an outer Baghdad]). The Western applications of symmetries are generally weak, although, the Western alchemy is okay
circle and an inner circle. The illustration on left is taken and at times superior (3 vs. 4).
from our ether page and it actually results in geometrically
determining the speed of light.

A square and a circle have been engaged from before

Pythagoras (Thales) and there are several pages on this
site (here and there and here
too) on circle squaring.

Pythagoreans love square numbers. In the present day

vernacular, moving energy is proportional to velocity
squared. Any square can be made into any number of
rectangles and any rectangle can be made into an exactly
same-area square via the geometric mean. Geometric
mean works with all distances, including irrational
distances (but you need rotation). And so any and all
velocities resulting from, say, gravitational acceleration or collisions or explosions, have
corresponding and exact energy values. Any square (any amount of energy) can be divided into
as many squares as you want — and so the energy of one moving object is conserved exactly
even if the object is broken up into many other objects.

 Instructions:
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 16/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to

Three pointed star Draw horizontal and vertical lines. The intersect is the origin O
Construct
the perfect triangle on a circle and another triangle on a semicircle – in three steps Draw a semicircle of radius r around O. This makes point V
Draw a circle around V of radius r

Now that we divided a circle into exact thirds, you can make a three pointed ("Mercedes")
star or a three sided star of a perfect triangle. In the illustration the larger triangle divides
the circle with three exact cords of length c for a perfect three pointed star.
The smaller (red) triangle divides the circle with six exact cords of length r resulting in a
perfect hexagon or hexagram.
You can verify (using the Pythagorean Theorem) that the relation between the cord c and
cord (radius) r is:
c2 = 3·r2
What physical entity is proportional to r2?
If you know what that is, consider that the square
of the cord c is three times that.

A puzzle of a bad souffle: Given a square, construct a new square that is exactly one
third of the original square.

You
can be fairly certain that the person will try to partition the square in some way but the
Triangle as a logical and mathematical construct solution is to erect a triangle on the square's side and then obtain the radius for the circle that covers the
triangle. Radius r is the side of the new square. [In our case the bad souffle does not cave in but runs over
Because three-pointed and six-pointed stars are geometrically perfect they can be used, circled,
the rim.]
as a symbol for 3 or 6 wavelengths wrapping around the nucleus. However, a hexagon and
hexagram reduce into a triangle under modulo math for harmonious ratios and do not manifest in It is not possible to reverse engineer a souffle without stepping back and understanding the
orbits (macro) — that is, showing a six-pointed star with two circles does not reflect nature. relationships between the ingredients and their proportions – as well as the irreversible nature of the baking
process.
A hexagon is also prominent in free energy work. Hexagon is full of different symmetries and, for
better or for worse, enables rapid transformations or projections. A six sided star of hexagon Can you apply the construction of the geometric
mean in the solution of this puzzle? Could you
could be of some interest regarding energy accumulation in
the micro and we included it in the use the geometric mean to generalize this puzzle for all possible
numerology section on the Pythagorean page. ratios of square areas? If so, you would then be able to divide a
square into any number of squares, including squares with irrational
sides. The geometric mean equates the perimeter (or area) of any
Without a circle, a triangle symbolizes 3-state
systemic (complete and never-ending) systems, rectangle to the side (or area) of a particular square.
each state being in one corner. Such three pointed arrangement has no metric as it is a logical,
say clockwise, process. (Some systemic processes call for quaternaries — think ancient Could squares with irrational sides be included in the general
Egyptians.) For Pythagoreans a triangle provides bounds for the ten dots of Tetractys (a division of a square into any and all other squares? If so, does it
triangular numeral 10), which also becomes one facet of a tetrahedron (projection from the apex mean that geometry does one up on arithmetic once again because
[or from your eye]). The right angle triangle does have metric of the Pythagorean Theorem, which arithmetic cannot give you the exact irrational number for the square's
side?
relates 1D to 2D via (ir)rational numbers (but does not solve for transcendentals).
Finally, if
energy
of a moving body is proportional to its
There is a very special place for the golden triangles. Two kinds of triangles apply here, velocity square(d),
can you divide such energy square into as
depending on whether the shorter or longer distance is used for the triangle's base. Golden many smaller square energy components as you wish? (Via a
triangles facilitate a perfect relationship between particular two circle's circumferences and a collision, gravitational attraction, or some other action-at-distance?)
straight distance. Yes, this is the fundamental reason for the existence of particular atomic
orbitals, which is driven by the exchange in the electron's 2D and photon's 1D energy {Feb
13, 2011}.
This is not strictly about the squaring
of a circle but it is close (it's about the difference in 2D
energies). A six sided star, a hexagon, is prominent in virus structures. Hexagons
are
partioned into a six-triangle grid, which serves -- through a geometric relation -- to identify
Differentiate by 3 almost all viruses. This is a complex topic. For example, a virus' hexagon is rendered
Finally, there is an aspect to the number 3 as the fundamental qualitative differentiator of nature. benign with a pentagon [my own thing]. The overall structure in 90+% of viruses is
We are mostly familiar with the dualities such as the real-virtual (Yang-Yin) or odd-even or icosahedron. Although
labeled 'an esthetically most pleasing shape' by some -- with 5-
ordered-creative but there is also a lesser known differentiator by three. Yes, we say animal, fold, 3-fold, and 2-fold symmetries -- all mainstream scientists ignore the morphing nature
mineral, vegetable and think it special, but here we are very fundamental. Pre-atomic, I'd say. So of the virus first brought forth by Rife (bio)
[virus approaches under a friendly flag and
morphs]. Because the current work on viruses discloses but the stained (i.e. dead) viruses,
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 17/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
much so the crop circles are worth studying just for that. [I would not go inside a crop circle for the
more than a few seconds when the circle is less than a day old — it is about the 3D energies.]
Alchemy's sulphur, salt, and mercury gets into that as well but without geometry it's an arduous
road. The Quantum Pythagoreans book explains what is at each corner of the Tetractys and
that's what it's about.

When you see a triangle with some symbol in the center (a dot, an eye, dragon), take such
symbol into 3D of the apex of a tetrahedron to see if it means something to you. mainstream is still way
behind Rife. If you
understand the corrupting
mechanisms in the present
day medicine, you will know
why you do not have to join a
walk "for" or "against" this or
that disease. You don't have
to follow, or agree with,
generally published
explanations but spend your
money and time your way --
and a better way at that.

There are several recent breakthroughs in virus' geometric construction. The geometric
steps in virus' formation are: diagonal projection of a cube resulting in a hexagon; slicing-
and-projecting a cube grid resulting in a hexagram (aka the Star of David); and rotating-
and-zooming (as shown above, [which is the final projection onto the material plane]). I see
some of these elements in the crop circles and, short of taking sides, I'd like the virus
construction viewpoint represented in crop circle analysis. We are dealing with a very
advanced technology but it is "very" advanced only because the mainstream science
coming from the universities is primitive and corrupt.

Twelve pointed
star Instructions for drawing
a
In practical terms the twelve pointed construction is about the design of a clock's face. In 12-pointed/12-sided star:
astrology the twelve Signs of the Zodiac is about the twelve sided division of the Solar ecliptic.
There is an even more interesting side: There are twelve computable states along the periphery 1.
Draw a horizontal line and
at the third level of the Great (Golden) Pyramid. In the infinite superposition of the virtual erect the vertical line. The
variables (aka wavefunctions), there are geometrically enabled states inside the pyramid that intersect is the origin O
allow a computable state to form. Yes, infinities can be worked and the Quantum Pythagoreans
book gets into that and at all levels of the pyramid. 2.
Draw a full circle of radius
R around O. This will be the
Eight pointed
star clock face
Our construction for the twelve fold division of a circle also divides a circle into eight exact
3.
At each of the horizontal
segments, or angles, because the 45 degree diagonals
are available for free from our twelve and vertical intercepts draw
point construction if you make full circles (and don't stop at the intersects with the central circle). additional circles of the same
This is also true the other way: When constructing the eight point division that is a regular radius R
octagon, the twelve fold division happens as well if the central circle is drawn in full (and you
don't just mark the intersects with the cardinals). So here you have the combined 8 & 12 point 4.
The intercepts of the
star construction. After a short Internet search I did not find an 8 & 12 point star common central circle with the
construction {Apr
30, 2011}. I found one logical assembly having the Chinese Zodiac on the outside cardinals and with the other
circle and eight binary Paqua states on the inside circle. (This tells me divination is intended but, circles yield the twelve points exactly distanced around the central circle.
because of our inherent construction feature, I'd turn it around the other way: 12 sides on the
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 18/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
inside circle and 8 points on the outside circle. This is counter-intuitive but there could be [is] a  
form of Tai Chi in this.)
Can you see how you could make a 24 point star using the diagonals? Almost every month
Music of Venus and other
planets we offer quick topics of general interest. In May 2011 a single construction shows how to
The common construction of the eight and 12 pointed stars starts with the combined two and make both the 24-point
and 16-point stars in just one construction.
three pointed stars. As you double the count the ratio stays the same: 3 to 2. (As you double the
points you go up by an octave.) This is a musical ratio and a harmonious one at that. What
planets subscribe to this ratio? It is not Venus-Earth but it is on the Venus
page.

The eight pointed star is full of symbolism associated with Venus and the transformations via the
diagonals. The ccw octagon is harmonious and made by Earth-Mars interplay, too. So enjoy the
eight-point star construction here via the cardinal and semi-cardinal directions but the Venus
page has a lot more on the eight fold division of a circle, including the Hunab Ku symbol.

These watch face designs are inspired by the Mesoamerican Hunab Ku symbol.

Perfect
star families
It
is easy to draw stars using geometry's tools, a straightedge and compass. By now we want to One
star inside another star
make stars geometrically, not just for perfection, but also because only the perfect stars manifest Among
the applications are spatial designs that combine perfect stars. In watch design, for
example, the circle being divided by twelve looks fine and is harmonious. In addition, it is harmonious to
in nature. A circle can be divided exactly into 2,
3, 5,
15, and 17 equal segments, technically overlay the 12 point layout with triangular, square, or pentagonal designs. You would not want to put a seven
called constructible polygons. (Some exclude the 2-segment division because it yields but a point star with a triangle together in the same (concentric) circle, for example, unless you want to invoke
virtual line of a circle's diameter — but I include it.) You may call this the 'fundamental' or 'primary' disharmony. Six gets "tricky" because it is disharmonious with larger numbers but is harmonious with five,
or direct sequence of perfect stars. Since any and all segments can be also exactly (evenly) making a pentagon (not a pentacle). There is also a disharmonious ccw pentagon and that one does not
divided by 2, you can find all
stars that have their points exactly spatially distanced by geometric include six.
means. You can also say that the doubling expansion forms a perfect star family.
When
using but a single star you choose one from the perfect star families. When combining stars,
however, you also must deal with harmony. A doubled star is always harmonious with its parent star -- they
For
example, you can make an eight point star or a 64 point star from a two point star through differ by an octave, but not all star combinations are harmonious. We are talking about harmony in point
simple halving of distances. From a three point star (above) you can make the exact hexagon symmetry, which is applicable to both the micro and the macro. See the book

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 19/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
and from there the twelve point star of the Zodiac or do a layout of a twenty
four point star for QUANTUM
PYTHAGOREANS
Feng Shui.
The
Book
Starting
with a 2 point star — the only direct even star — you can construct 4, 8, 16, etc. stars
you could also label the 'evenly even' sequence of stars. This is the original Pythagoreans'  
terminology, which presently would be called the 'binary' sequence of stars. From the 3 point star  If
a musical tone x is harmonious with tone y and y is
you can continue to halve each side to make the 6, 12, 24, etc. point stars. From the five-point harmonious with z,
is z
harmonious
with x? Not always.
star you can make the 10, 20, or 40 point stars. The book explains harmony's geometric foundation and
then the star drawings bring harmony into the visual
Every perfect star with the even number of points will have symmetry about an axis and about a range. Quantum
Pythagoreans provides the formula for
point. If you think there is no such thing as a two
point star, it is on the Venus page and it is harmonious musical notes and you will also know why
formed by the combined Neptune-Pluto 3:2 orbit. some stars just do not feel right.

The
stars that are left out from direct and doubling constructions cannot be constructed exactly. Harmony
is not just extended to the macro. Harmony is
For example, you cannot make a nine point star directly — or indirectly from a three point star. fundamental to both the micro and macro constructions
The seven, eleven, and thirteen pointed stars are also not constructible. and, therefore, to stability in general.

Numbers
that divide a circle exactly could have a name of their own. A good fit is Thanks
to Paganism, a five-pointed pentacle star is
'circumpositional,' for these numbers compose in a circle exactly and will be [are] prominent in presently classified as harmonious ("opening") or
atomic constructions. disharmonious ("banishing"). In the book you'll learn how
ANY and all stars can be classified as harmonious or
Carl Gauss "recently" added the 17 sided polygon as the perfect star. The 15 sided polygon is in disharmonious.
Euclid's
Elements, Book 4, Proposition 16, and is made by a combo of a three and a five pointed
star (a 5-point star is evenly rotated three times around the circle). In
the beginning was the number – and the power of numbers begins ..

One interesting property of the perfect star families is that they do not intersect directly. A More
..
sequence growing from each of the direct perfect star number does not match (overlap) with
another sequence. That is,

from 2 we get 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384, 32768, etc The perfect star families of numbers introduce some changes to our perception of universe
building and how everyday reality happens to come about. Mathematicians can make all kinds of star
from 3 we get 6, 12,
24, 48, 96, 192, 384, 768, 1536, 3072, 6144, 12288, 24576.. constructions, in 2D and 3D – but only the perfect star families can begin to bridge the straight line energies,
from 5 we get 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280, 2560, 5120, 10240, 20480.. such as photonic energy, with circular orbits and orbital energies. Because the vast majority of the real energy in
from 15 we get 30, 60,
120, 240, 480, 960, 1920, 3840, 7680, 15360, 30720.. the universe is in the form of spinning or orbital energy – that is, energy having angular momentum, the perfect
from 17 we get 34, 68, 136, 272, 544, 1088, 2176, 4352, 8704, 17408, 34816.. star families of numbers take the front seat. Scientists can draw all kinds of curves but these are usually fancies.
Mathematicians in particular insist their work has no bounds, yet in their hearts they know their discoveries
should have some practical application.
Each member of the perfect all-star family has but one origin. Once a number becomes even it
stays even. 3, 5, 15, and 17 make the only exact odd stars.
New
Timekeeping
A circle is a zero pointed star having an infinite number of points. On a circle there are no Starting with 24 hours per day and having 80 minutes in an hour, every minute of every day
inbound-outbound changes and, therefore, no points. Topologically, however, a circle is (24x80=1920) would divide a circle exactly. Such is not the case today. After that, a binary
composed of infinitely many geometric points. This is a technical play on words. However, a number 1024 would stand for seconds and continue to divide the day's circle exactly. One
single geometric point, a 0D point, has an infinity built within it [yeah, takes work]. of the new seconds would then be the exact 1,966,080th part of a day. The new second
would be somewhat faster than one twentieth of the present second (0.05). While adequate
Note that for almost all sports without further division, additional circle-exact divisions are always
360 does not divide a circle exactly available – something that is not possible to do today. (Once you lose the exact circle
division it cannot be recovered.) The sweep of the seconds hand would be 1/3 faster than
260 does not divide a circle exactly (Mayan Tzoltek calendar). The end of the Tzoltek calendar is the present sweep to make one full revolution in 1/80th of an hour. At all numerical
not (cannot be) synchronized with a rotational parameter such as the precession. It is markings in the illustration on right – the hours, minutes, and seconds – would not be
conceivable the Mayans had difficulties reconciling the rotational parameters (based on fractions. For example, the sweep of the seconds hand spanning one half of the quadrant
transcendental numbers) with some linear time-measuring parameters. The numbers' unexact adds up to 128 seconds {May
11, 2011}.
nature would lead to "disaster" conclusions. Well, yes, it could have been their own square-a-
circle problem. One half quadrant, then, is 128 seconds or 10 minutes or 3 hours. The new minute count of
80 per hour divides a circle exactly and using 80 points around the circle can make the

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 20/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
320 does divide a circle exactly and the 1/320 (reciprocal) is called ro by the ancient Egyptians perfect 4, 5, 8, 10, 16, 20, 40, and
80 pointed stars. From the 24 hour
While a circle can be divided exactly by hours (24) or minutes (60), a circle cannot be divided by clock face one would make the
hours and minutes (24x60=1440). perfect 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 pointed
stars.
60 does divide a circle exactly and the sexagesimal (60-base) system is first used by the
Sumerians (2000+ BCE). Although all mainstream math books claim we use 60 minutes and 60 A pentagram star is harmonious
seconds as a result of Sumerian and Babylonian cultures, none of these "math" references ("opening" in Wicca speak) if drawn
mention that while 60 does divide a circle exactly, a circle cannot be divided exactly by minutes counter-clockwise and
and seconds (by 3600). But of course, mainstream math is cluless on what the exact geometric disharmonious ("banishing") if drawn
circle division brings to the table. clockwise. Once you understand the
harmony/disharmony, you will be
While a circle is divisible by 10 exactly, a circle is not divisible exactly by a hundred or a thousand able to extend it to other stars
or any higher decimal multiple. The decimal fraction format aka the decimal fraction notation is besides pentagram. Some counter-
not suitable for the circular geometry beyond the first decimal point. clockwise 8 and 10 pointed stars are
harmonious but these stars are
Is it strange the Mayans — while having the positional notation of base 20 — had no sub-unity disharmonious if drawn clockwise.
base-20 fractions? Perhaps not. Just as in the decimal and sexagesimal systems, the base 20 This does not mean the clock's
(vigesimal) system is useless past the first vigesimal point in circular geometry. hands rotation should reverse. See
the Venus page.

Now, could you come up with

another sequence that always makes an exact circle division, both locally (by itself) and
overall (with respect to the starting circle)? Yes. Start with 20 hours per day and divide each
hour by 192 minutes. Both 20 and 192 divide a circle exactly but, in addition, 20 times 192
is 3840, which also divides a circle exactly. Is there more to this than making new and
different watches? You bet.

Tiling of pentagons and stars

Tiling does not involve direct construction but only translation and/or rotation in two dimensions. When
the "ancients" instructed us to use the straightedge and compass, they were not
Translations are linear (straight) motions. The line provides symmetry about a (such) line really talking about constraints because they were talking about geometry. Rotation about a
[feminine] while rotations are always symmetrical about a point [masculine]. This does not seem point is about the use of the compass. Straight movement (translation) is about a symmetry about a line and
like a big deal but the property that allows (in this case pentagon's) translation or rotation to get perhaps you could see now that the line of symmetry is a virtual line – that is, the line of symmetry is an empty
to an identical solution is exceptionally important in universe building (and in the group theory, slit. (Would you go as far as to have Justice brandishing her sword with a slit down the middle of the blade?)
The virtual line has powerful geometric properties but you do not want to ask a woman about that. Not that
you couldn't, it's just that the explanation is nonverbal.

The
pentagon template for the illustration on the left was obtained with MS PowerPoint by selecting
AutoShapes .. Basic Shapes. Pick the pentagon object. On the newer versions it is Insert .. Shapes .. Basic
Shapes.

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 21/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
too).

Tiling
of five pentagons to make a cool five pointed star was (first?) published by Kepler in
Harmonices
Mundi (1619)

If
you tile five pentagons you get the five-point star in the center. Now, if you take five five-point Testing for reversibility is crucial in the understanding of relationships. Dyslexia
is a condition
stars and arrange them around with their points touching, do you get a pentagon in the center? that is constantly reversing relationships in all modalities: verbal, tonal, geometric, written -- to see if the
You
always want to test for reversibility,
even at the expense of appearing dyslexic. Relations reversal possibly acquires another meaning, or if the reversal carries no meaning. The Quantum Pythagoreans
are reversible only under certain conditions and you want to know what they are. If you assume book treats the difficult topic of relationships by novel exploration of dependent-independent properties of a
relations are always reversible as they are in algebra, you will 1) understand but a limited subset relationship. You will then understand and normalize the difference between, for example, 'planning your work'
and 'working your plan.'
of reality [if you are lucky] and/or 2)
misinterpret relations that are not reversible.

For example, if there is a quantum mechanical explanation of gas pressure, there could be a way
of making the phenomena reversible. Now, how would you reverse the rotation of a light mill?
(Give it a thought and get the
answer.)

We readily apply force to get things moving. So, how would you reverse 'something' and have the
force arise?

A circle of stars, a pattern of stars:

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 22/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to

The
tiling construction — that is, movement about a point and/or translation along a line, of Self
test:-) Straighten up two adjacent fingers. Do you see a difference if you think of these fingers
some objects may result in the appearance of another object. This is at times referred to as as two closely spaced pencils – or as an empty slit or space that is between the pencils? Photons and
"negative space." While it is true that the original object is real and in some respects positive, the electrons do, for they make very different patterns for a single bar, two bars, a single slit, or a dual slit.
'negative space' label is but an introductory way of looking at it (and a left-brain way at that). A
good way is to see this as the act of creation of the virtual object. For
brainwork: 1) How
is it possible, and 2)
What is the utility of the result that one pattern ends up in the
left side of the brain while the other in the right side?
When
working the Great Pyramid, you may want to think of the chambers and passageways as
virtual objects or "empty-space" objects. It really helps.

Geometry
versus arithmetic

Ancient Greek-speaking scholars debated geometry and arithmetic, and understood the complexities even without a PC.

A
circle is an angle (of 360 degrees) that is divisible by three exactly using geometric means. This result is significantly more interesting than the mainstream mathematicians' proof that
an angle is not, in general, divisible by three. If you think of a circle with the orbit (cosmic) and/or orbital (atomic) applications in mind, you will see there is lots of fun in figuring out what
works[, rather than beefing up your resume with things that don't]. So,
the ancient riddle about dividing the angle into thirds has more than one answer and no answer is the wrong answer.
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 23/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
It is, however, a parting, or the "Tau" riddle that to some makes all the difference. But again, no angle can be divided by three exactly arithmetically. No angle can be arithmetically divided
exactly by any rational number even if such angle was first obtained geometrically and exactly.

A
circle cannot be divided by 7 or 9 equally and exactly. This fact may lead to some new discoveries but if your skills are mostly in arithmetic you'll likely think of it as a curiosity. That is the
basis of reductionism, for a reductionist first makes a claim that arithmetic is just as good as geometry (brain "grouping"), and then happily ignores the advantages of geometry. Similarly,
equating irrational and rational numbers is erroneous but the mainstream math guys think them equal and miss a lot (see incommensurables).

Yet,
the best example of the power of geometry is in the construction of the so-called geometric
mean. Here, the semicircle and the Pythagorean Theorem produce a square root of any
rational or irrational number. Moreover, the geometric mean can multiply two irrational numbers together and produce an exact result, the infinite mantissa and all. No computer can do
that.

The
bottom line: Geometry always leads, arithmetic always follows.

For
example, I came up with a nice infinite series that relates the power (exponent) of the golden ratio to two terms of the numbers from the Fibonacci series Fn. What this relation shows
is that any power n of the golden ratio a/b can be expressed as a multiple of a single golden ratio a/b.

IGn = (a/b)n-1 = Fn-1(a/b)

+ Fn-2

In
case n=5, IG5 = (a/b)4 = F4(a/b) + F3 = 3(a/b) + 2

Initially
I called this the IG series for Instant Gold series. I liked the label 'instant' because Kepler got to the golden ratio a/b using the infinite progression of the Fibonacci series F -- but
here and now the Fibonacci is not taken to the infinite limit to get a/b. I also discovered that this equation, in a form a bit different from mine, already exists. After a while and once I figured
out what is happening geometrically, I could not help but calling it the Ivsin Gold series [yes, thank you], simply because the geometric understanding opens up a whole new world of
applications {5/5/2011}.
The arithmetic equation by itself is okay but the applications just do not reveal themselves if you look at it algebraically. Try it yourself ..

In
another example, you know that 360 degrees in a circle is arbitrary. Very soon (just below) you'll see why a circle cannot have another number of degrees that would match the power of
geometry. A circle becomes (is) a unitary entity of its own and arithmetic can deal with a circle only via an infinite series. Having said that, a circle would not be possible to turn into a
square — but, by using the virtual numbers and understanding the infinite superposition .. ..  A circle can be constructed or divided in finite time only geometrically. Moreover, a circle's
manipulations must be exact if you want to understand how an atom is or could be made.

It
is now time to visit the angles of a circle. Can we map the angles in such a way as to obtain correspondence between geometry and arithmetic?

What's
your angle?

Arithmetic
makes it strange Arithmetic
makes it practical
In
a calculator, the angle of 360 degrees is divisible by 9 without a remainder, but this is but Pythagoreans
had a category of numbers they called 'abundant.' Such numbers are evenly
an arithmetic computation. In geometry, the circumference of a circle issues from Pi,
which is divisible (without a remainder) by many other numbers. Number 60 (minutes in an hour) is a
a transcendental number and so you cannot be arbitrary about the length of the circle or the good example as it is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30 and 60 -- which, not
exactness of an angle inside a circle. Yes, the angle of 40 degrees is not constructible incidentally, are the number of points of stars one can make with minute watch face
exactly because a circle is not divisible by 9 exactly. But it does happen that a circle is markings. Another convenient (abundant) number is 24 (hours in a day), but we presently
divisible by 40 exactly and then an angle of 9 degrees can be had exactly. Division of a circle divide the day only by 2 (am and pm) and by 3 (work part), and possibly by 12
into an arbitrary integer quantity of equal and exact segments (or angles) is not possible. (entertainment). Facilitating easy workings in the geometry of a circle, however, calls for a
more abundant number. If you were to come up with a good working number for the total
What
then is the advantage in dividing the circle exactly by this or that number? The atom number of degrees in a circle, you may find 360 to be a very accommodating number. 360
holds together by having electrons wrapping around the nucleus. Because the electron's degrees of a circle divide evenly into quarters (possibly the most important requirement right
momentum is also a wave (de Broglie), the electron's wave must evenly, that is exactly, next to 365 days in a year). It divides evenly by 5, 10, and 20, too. You've already noted that
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 24/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
close upon itself to form a standing and a round wave that is symmetrical about a point. To the division by 5 (and consequently by 10) is very practical because a circle division by five
the Pythagoreans the numbers are everything and this is because numbers actually create brings in the golden proportion. The practicality of this number won the day even though
things. 360 is also evenly divisible by 9 and a circle cannot be divided by 9 exactly. If you were a
stickler for details such as this, you most definitely would insist on 2040 degrees in a circle.
The
mainstream scientists' argument that "computer's representation of an irrational number 2040 is evenly divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15, and 17 -- all numbers that divide a circle
is close enough" is, unfortunately, not relevant to atomic construction. Scientists just do not exactly through geometric means. The good old 360 is not evenly divisible by 17 and that
know how to interpret 'precise' and 'exact' in an applications setting. The scientist can divide means that exact geometrically-obtained angles do not necessarily have a corresponding
the circle by nine to a very large number of decimal places, but there will never
be a whole number of degrees if we stick to the present 360 quantity notation. Both 360 and
wavelength that would fit nine times around the circle of the orbital. Incidentally, 'fit' is the 2040 are not evenly divisible by 7, 11, and 13 -- as it should be. But 2040 is also not evenly
original (superior?) word for a 'node' that was used by Newton in his description of standing divisible by 9, and we have even better correspondence between geometry and arithmetic.
waves. In today's terminology, we would say that a nine-wavelength, or 18-node, standing The year 2040 could be the most harmonious year coming up. [But don't tell IRS. They'll put
circular wave cannot and will not happen (will not fit). Numbers 7, 9, 11, 13, 19, 21, 22, 23, this number on a form and spoil it.]
25 and others cannot divide a circle exactly. Most of these numbers are incomposite (prime)
numbers. Number 9, though, is a composite number as well as a square number, but it Now
that all people are smart enough to handle as "huge" number as 2040, is it time to
cannot be used to divide a circle exactly. [Does this mean the Chinese Emperors could not make our circle geometry as sophisticated as it can be? Are you ready for the sum of
sing? Having said that, they might have been good golf players.] Number 5 is incomposite internal angles in a triangle to equal 1020 degrees instead of 180? And the internal angle of
but can be used to divide a circle exactly. What is needed, then, is a class of numbers that an equilateral triangle would be 340 degrees instead of 60? Even if you could legislate the
compose
in a circle, instead of just being composite numbers (composed of products of change – and during the French Revolution they "legislated" 100 degrees in a circle and
other numbers). These numbers, called circumpositional numbers [by yours truly], are 100 minutes in an hour -- the bottom line is that there is no perfect number for a quantity of
prominent in atomic construction. Above, we introduced these numbers as the perfect
all- degrees in a circle that would be a whole number or even a rational number. That is, there
star family of
numbers. is no number that would be evenly divisible by those numbers that divide a circle exactly
geometrically. In the example of the 2040, this number is not evenly divisible by 16. [Some
If
you don't mind additional complexity, or perhaps simplicity, a circle can be divided exactly Masonic authors give Freemasons credit for leading the French Revolution. If so, they
only through geometric means. Another way of saying 'geometric means' is 'spatial distance would certainly be quite ignorant on what to do in the aftermath – all their Gs
means.' Yes, the circumference of a circle is a transcendental number and a division of any notwithstanding.]
transcendental number by any real number remains transcendental (a real number is finite).
The computer can use only real numbers and the length of the circumference is then Whole
numbers and rational numbers are called real numbers – a good name. An
rounded off if it is to be stored in a computer. What this also means is that a computer cannot incommensurable (transcendental or irrational) number can never become a real number
give you a perfect star. What this really means is that you must have movement to create a unless it is transformed.
The transformation is irreversible because we cannot save an
perfect star. In other words, you cannot make a perfect star via placement or measurement irrational number such as SQRT(2) in a computer and retrieve it as (convert it back into) the
(statically, topologically) with a ruler or a computer or a computer-calibrated protractor. As
a original irrational number without first taking a nip off the number – think Ouroboros and
Pythagorean you might realize that you cannot construct a perfect star without a compass – visit Circle
and Pi. Reversing the transformation calls for addition of the virtual energy [think
that is, you need rotation to complete exact constructions. A compass is the only tool that Isis and possibly Thoth if you are familiar with his eye restoration story].
allows you to enter 2D from 1D. In other words, a compass allows you to turn. A larger
implication is that there must be movement even at the atomic core level — and under radial If
you want to get deeper into transformations of rational (real) and irrational numbers –
symmetry the movement is also about frequency. (You might guess here is one of the think ancient Egyptian fractions [here, you will need to appreciate three things: 1)
Ancient
gateways to gravitation and yes, the philosopher's stone opens up to the alchemist.) The Egyptian fractions are quite sophisticated; 2)
Present day scientists are clueless as to the
necessity of movement permeates everything. Even the ability to square a circle appears like ancient Egyptian fraction applications or origin; and 3)
Our present civilization is not
basic stuff when developing (Tai) Chi in your body (think 3D). necessarily advancing.]

When
dividing a circle with the straightedge and compass, the goal is to make the number
to become,
for the number's geometric construction creates something specific to that
number. There is, then, more to numbers than philosophy, and you may want to visit the
original number apps guys, Pythagoras and his fellow Pythagoreans.
There is a treatment
there of real, virtual, and irrational numbers. Irrationals and transcendentals are in the family
of incommensurables but transcendentals are not constructible through the Pythagorean
Theorem (from 2D of the curve to 1D of the hypotenuse), while additional differences
between irrationals is based on applications. [There are good and bad numbers and some
of them have an infinite mantissa.]

What
does a star in a circle represent? What is the meaning and symbolism of a star inside
a single circle? The point count of the star is about the wavelength multiples that curve and
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 25/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
create the atom. Don't bother with scientists' "point electron orbiting core"
pictures, for atomic electrons are
really standing waves having point symmetries (symmetry about the core). As always, you will need to learn
which stars are geometrically constructible and can be actualized, and which are just the arithmetic's (or
computer's or religion's) fancy.

Is
the atomic core composed of standing waves? You
bet. Scientists have way too much invested in
the solid and static core hypothesis and so it is safe to talk about the pulsing and standing waves of the core.
Scientists are way off and, for example, they made up "strong nuclear force" because they do not understand the
wave nature of the core. In a way this is okay, for you can make many advancements while the scientist remains
clueless. For example, the core's shape is not necessarily spherical.

With
all their equations, scientists think highly of whatever it is they describe with them. Saying that the
scientist will remain clueless is no idle talk, however. On our Circle
& Pi page we also highlight the inadequacy of
algebra, for algebra's constructs cannot deal with the operation of equivalence. Algebra completely misses
irreversibility, too.

As
a Pythagorean you want to figure out what entity will prevail in the interaction with a
standing-wave electron and with a standing-wave proton. Why, could you then do a precision surgery on the
atom?

Seven
pointed star The wonderful part of the circular geometry is that it needs to be treated separately and carefully.
A circle cannot be divided by seven exactly. Yes, we can say that seven people cannot share a Euclid may have proved that no two Natural numbers (integers) when put in a ratio will result in an
round pizza equally, and leave it at that, except that the number seven is the first number with incommensurable (irrational) number. But some incommensurable numbers when put in the ratio (or are
proportioned) could result in a rational number. You may want to reflect on what it means. As far as Euclid
such property. When things are happening inside a circle — that is, when things are spinning and goes, not much. After all, Euclid talks about what does not happen. But what does it mean when
evolving, the wave folding encounters the number seven and consequent inability to fit around transcendental -- that is curving -- and straight line (ir)rational geometries meet at certain points? Think
the circle (and make a perfect star). When you examine the Mesoamerican Hunab
Ku symbol, transformations and visit the Proofs page that talks about the squaring of a circle.
there are two seven-sided areas (heptagons) and now the challenge is to explain that. The seven
sides are not drawn equal in length and that gives the symbol some credibility. The heptagons Understanding the angles in a circle certainly takes you to another and very substantial pursuit of
pivot into 3D and now it gets really intriguing. If we don't take the Hunab Ku (some say Hanub universe building. Looking back, is there some work that was done just in this area? But of course, you'll have
to step over the reductionists, yawn at the popularizers, and laugh at people who allow to be called experts.
Ku) as a product of coca leaf-chewing fancy, there are many interesting things happening around [I'd bet 10:1 they will talk about running out of energy.] The ancient Egyptian fractions have the numerator
the number seven. expressed as an oval having the value of 1. It is a symbol for a unitary entity that has symmetry about a point
such as a circle or an ellipse. And if you have two circles that you want to divide into sub-unity fractions, are
I'd be careful in using the seven pointed star. Adopting a regular heptagon or a regular seven we really talking about two atomic orbitals and the possible (energy) fractional values they can acquire during
pointed star shows you don't get it. So I'd draw the star free hand or use an irregular heptagon. an electron jump? So now you have yet another quest to make. A road where you will also discard all the
Mayans have a gap in their seven-segment Ouroboros too. "modern" mathematicians musing at the awkwardness of the ancient Egyptian fractions. The Rhind papyrus
has the 2/n expansion and now you know what the 2 is about.
The
Goddess Seshat's symbol from ancient Riemann sees a sphere with longitudinals that, with identical curvature, converge and meet at the poles at
Egypt is a contextualized seven-leafed plant finite distance where they close upon themselves (think atomic orbitals in a closed 3D topology). Although
(she is a scribe, which means she is a Riemann, a math guy, did not have an atom in his mind, his geometry is 'parallel yet finite.' He discovered an
magician). The leaves spread out in a star unusual way of obtaining all incomposite (prime) numbers. We have three book
reviews on this remarkable
configuration, but the resulting seven individual.
pointed star is not regular. [If you think the
symbol is a cannabis plant then that's fine by Then there are the scales of the fish [yeah, the dumb fish]. The sweeps of the scales subtend a
particular angle. Do you think a fish could fly or extract energy from the swirling water around it by using the
me. However, geometry prevails (has geometry of its scales? In reverse, could you work the straight-moving energy to close upon itself and make
priority) while cannabis also has 5 and 9 leaf an atomic orbital? Think pyramid geometry and Schauberger.
varieties.]

Illuminati,
Masons and New Order Guys. Pythagoreans, too
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 26/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
The Statue of Liberty has a hair dress with  Symbolism
is about associating something with something similar. Pythagorean logic, for
seven rays. The symbolism of her 7-point example, says that two points make an axis and then the number two is behind the mirror
star is rich with 'seven seas' and 'seven symmetry, aka the axial, even, or feminine symmetry. As a Pythagorean you have no
liberal arts' interpretations, but I prefer to problem with that, and wouldn't use the term "axis of evil" because both the constructive
look at it geometrically and enjoy the fact the and destructive energies exist about an axis (about 1D). You'd then apply one point of 0D as the
rays are not regular. source for rotation and consequent (odd, masculine) symmetry. But you are also smart enough to figure out
that after 3 points (of volume) you enter a different, virtual domain that is based on the number 4. Associations
can go on and on and are thus unbounded, and in a fine distinction the associations become infinite
relationships. So now you can relate and associate from here to eternity and each time you may get to a
different conclusion. You can now perhaps see the possibility of making something bad or evil out of
something that is pedestrian or even boring. 

So you want to ask if the result you reached is beneficial or not. If

you think accusing someone
of evil thoughts is beneficial to your religion then you are a part of a religion that is sustained by attempted
oppression of others. In short, your religion is not based on truth. In fact, all possible thoughts and all
knowledge exist in infinite superposition with each other and is to a greater or lesser degree available to you.
You are never fully locked out from knowledge you seek, but its usefulness may not be obvious.

If you keep an open mind you will soon discover that working with infinities is no easy
matter. Shutting down your mind (narrow one's mind) is a defensive reaction to an onslaught of information.
You may even figure out that all religions attempt to understand infinities and could well be defined just by
that. So relax. Infinities can be worked but they need different methods. Things that don't add up simply won't
happen.

[So what is my Pythagorean take on the 7-point irregular star? It is about the creation or
release (liberation) of energy. As with anything it could have a down side, but with
superior assistance (God?) it can be managed and be useful. Oh, the thing about God is
that you have to ask. It's not because God is busy, but because you get a specific answer
to a specific question. Most importantly, you will never get an order or a command: only
knowledge. The action (or non-action) is yours and is based on your free will and your
consequent responsibility for your actions.]

Historical
Note
 Johann Balmer was the guy who opened wide the barn doors of quantum
mechanics.
Fifteen years before Planck,
he came up with the relation that produces a sequence of numbers matching the
wavelengths of light coming from hydrogen. These are not just any numbers – they are wavelengths
corresponding to particular electron jumps and no other. Balmer did for quantum mechanics what Kepler did for
gravitation: He came up with the math equation that matched known experimental data and made successful
predictions of other new, yet undiscovered, wavelengths. But there is a bit more to it. Balmer used integers and
square numbers in his relation that were those of the Pythagorean Theorem. Well, good ol' Pythagoras was not
only right all along but the breadth of his – some say HIS – teaching was also the foundation of quantum
mechanics. Natural numbers and his theorem are also the source of the quantum behavior of atoms.

Squaring
a circle

This topic is expanded and has a page of its own. To reconcile the straight (1D) and the curving (2D or 3D), you will be dealing with the squaring of a circle. Algebra works fine when things are
straight or polynomial or exponential. Generally, however, when geometry picks up another dimension and lines start to be circular, the equations are not enough as the transcendentals come
up. The relationship of the squaring
of a circle to this page's perfect division of a circle is in the possibility of linearizing the curved segments (arcs) of a circle and then making a tractable
exchange between curving and straight topologies. So there is a continuation to 'how to draw a star' and it deals with energy. Can we say that geometry is about energy? Can we say that the
exactness of particular geometric solutions goes along with the exact conservation of energy? Of course, Pythagorean methods are used to find new ways while mainstream science continues

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 27/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
to be arm chair science by playing up one trivial answer as the only answer. At times politicians pick up the 'square a circle' analogy and then you should know they are trying to find excuses
and "explain" failures to their supposedly dumb constituents. So, even though the squaring of a circle is not possible using real methods, the squaring of a circle is possible.

Alchemy
The complexity of our environment is oftentimes worked through alchemy. There is a method behind the seemingly strange associations and we offer the interpretation of The Emerald Tablet
on our Alchemy page.

Summary,
Cosmic (Macro) Summary,
Atomic
(Micro)
Pythagorean
discovery of irrationals spawned the urgent pursuit of geometry lasting over 2400 Light
is understood as moving or standing linear -- that is, straight, waves following Newton's
years. Kepler brought arithmetic to the forefront by establishing the mathematical and analysis of fringes (first observed as fringe rings). As light becomes closely associated with
arithmetic relations of heavenly orbits. In effect and in fact, Kepler introduced the parameter of matter, Balmer kicks off the QM atomic pursuit with a Pythagorean relation. A wavefunction is
time in the mathematical context, which made it possible to make planetary position forecasts understood as a probability distribution of an atomic particle — a great step forward by
— forecasting being Kepler's life long passion. Because any two gravitationally interacting Heisenberg and von Neumann. A moving particle has momentum but momentum can also
bodies always have a solution, the parameter of time derived from such periodic solutions is be worked as a wave — a second great step, this time by de Broglie. A moving electron now
also repeatable (periodic) and time can be used to make forecasts. Even though time is gets to become a wave as well, but this wave must curve – that is, become circular, and
always a derived (dependent) variable, the mathematical solution establishes reversibility and close upon itself in a symmetry about a point (about a core). The circular (or rounded)
allows the time parameter derived from this
system to be used. (The equal sign indicates electron orbital and the straight path of light need to be energy-reconciled through the
reversibility but reversibility is by no means a given.) Another way of seeing the mathematical squaring of a circle — the first difficult hurdle.
solution and consequent time reversibility is that the spatial distance (space) and time form an
overlay. In a chaotic system, or in a non-periodic system such as the free economy system, Ether
is taken out of science's purview, which is the Great Reduction making the scientist that
the parameter of time cannot be used to make predictions. much poorer in the end. Scientists cannot make headway and talk about impossibilities. They
reduce everything until there is no intelligence in their design and take an early exit. (In their
Geometrically,
you can take any square and construct another square that has exactly twice last hurrah the angry mob bashes and trashes cold fusion.) Scientists thus successfully
the area of the original square. A square can be increasing in infinitely small increments, reduced themselves into a group of believers in 'light-is-real-and-puts-pressure-on-mirror.'
including irrationals, while the doubled square follows that exactly (think conservation of While much of today's physics rests on it, the scientist has no guts and no brains to perform
energy of a moving object). This is something your computer cannot do. If you think this is no the actual experiment measuring the presumed pressure light puts on a mirror. Scientists are
big deal and it is something for the ancients to contemplate – that's fine. The gateway question not able to face up to the truth that a light beam does not and cannot put pressure on a mirror
that makes all the difference is: "Can you construct infinity?" Certainly the most enticing and so they are stuck perpetuating, defending, and proselytizing their dogma.
question is: "Can you stop moving bodies at a distance?"
Meanwhile,
geometry is receiving new impetus by reviving its superiority over arithmetic and
algebra. The golden proportion, the infinite and instant wavefunction superposition, the
understanding of irrational and transcendental numbers, linearizing particular segments of a
circle, and the possibility of creating electron waves with harmonics-series energy
components just might get the atomic understanding going again – perhaps in another
country, perhaps by another group of professionals.

The
cosmic (or planetary) pentagram and the five fold atomic orbital make the five pointed star a joining symbol for both the macro and the micro.

While
the atom's orbitals are symmetrical about a point (have radial symmetry), the valence orbitals in a molecule need to close around two points of symmetry (the cores of the atoms are
some distance apart). Yes, the Hyperstar has an answer to that on our golden
proportions page. {Dec,
18, 2009}

Pentagon
Pyramid

  Three and Four must remain separate even though they are also joined. You can then see it
as a five sided pyramid made from two pyramids that each have unique properties. The

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 28/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
overall 3D structure has almost all numbers in it but the point is that the numbers must play
together to their best advantage (rather than just being represented).

Do you see the number zero? Or is it the infinity? Could it be both? Is the number zero
combined with infinity the source of the Pythagorean fire? The root of the pyra-mid? The
Central fire? The hearth of Zeus? Archimedes' fulcrum of the heaven and the earth? Just a
plain (free) electron? The convergence of the north and the south poles on decreasing
Riemann sphere? A point of the zero dimensional (0D) geometric construct? 'The One' of
alchemy? Something even smaller than the infinitesimal of Newton and Leibniz? The dot in
the semicircle on the AUM symbol? A computational construct for all of the above from "all of
the above?" The top dot of Tetractys? My favorite: The eye Thoth sends to look for Tefnut
when she runs away to Nubia (yes, the eye finds her).

If you think this pyramid is about marriage, you are on the right track. The Three [male] and
Four [female] are joined through the point of the infinite. This joining is applicable to the actual
marriage where the joining is through God – all there is. The alchemical marriage would have
the female part becoming more abstract although the four-sided pyramid geometry continues
to be needed for dealing with the infinite. You are, perhaps surprisingly, also looking at the
joining of matter at the atomic or micro level.

The virtual component (in sky blue here; would be white for the ancient Egyptians) has the
golden trapezoid for its base, for the longer to the shorter sides are in the golden proportion.
The real component has one of the golden triangles for its base.

If you like alchemy, the triangular pyramid is the king (or sun, gold) while the four-sided
Self-test:-) If you are not happy about the pentagon base and/or the pyramid being "split up" or "broken pyramid is the queen (moon, silver). Yes, this is the 3 vs. 4.
up"
or "separated," you are not getting the picture. You may want to think about the red part as being the tangible
component while the blue part is the intangible (knowledge, virtual) component. If that does not help, stay in 2D In the ancient Egyptian context, the crown of Egypt has two separate components: The white
[earthbound?] where the pentagon is continuous. (upper, virtual) and the red (lower, real). The gap between the two is the ancient Egyptian blue
crown and is invoked at war. (The gap is white in our pentagonal pyramid.)
If
you think Two rather than Four is feminine, you are very close. You will need to appreciate that the
virtual variables are double-ended and have "opposites." Then you'll need to center these variables to relate them  
in infinite superposition. (Quantum Pythagoreans book helps in this area too.)
 QUANTUM
PYTHAGOREANS
The
engagement of Three and Four is just that: It can be supportive in some contexts and in others it  Book by Mike Ivsin
could be conflicting, in which case rebalancing work is needed.
Pythagoreans
use the knowledge of numbers to
arrive at harmonious and stable systems. Numbers'
So, the recommendation for The Pentagon is to modify one of the pentagons (or build a new inner one) properties under different symmetries yield specific
to reflect the separate golden trapezoid and the golden triangle. The new construction slants upward toward a solutions. Numbers create the duality while the
point. It does not need to top off in a point as long as the edges are converging toward a point. (If it does top off, engagement of the duality's components leads to
think about the straightness of the edges -- it ain't straightforward.)
organization.

This
pentagonal pyramid is on Mars. The picture credit most likely goes to Quantum
Pythagoreans applies the Tetractys
NASA although I don't know the particulars of image enhancements processing -- construct and that results in all observable cosmic
none or too much. Note the pentagonal aspect is not regular (a point-to-point straight topologies. The book describes the nature's
line over a ridge and through the center can be made).
computational mechanism, especially as it applies to
waves.

What
it takes to transform energies. Your body is a
component and it is not the only one. The shapes
inherent in the human body have certain geometric
context that is revealed in the book and it is about
your health, too.
www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 29/30
2021-06-29 Draw five-point star pentagram, pentacle, pentagon. Other stars how-to
There
is one symbol that uses a circle framed by two vertical lines. These
lines are at times shown You
will like and appreciate the simplicity and the power of numbers. The
as two (usually) identical posts or columns. At other times it is shown as a person holding two vertical sticks, Pythagorean management of numbers takes you on the road to reality and invites you
candles, or wands. This symbolism, however, is not about the 3 vs. 4. Rather, the two lines or sticks or columns to drive it as well.
are about the virtual line of the even symmetry that is relevant to the virtual domain and the energy therein. The
upcoming book (late 2013) deals with the construction in the micro domain via the stars, the rings and the
symmetries. Yes, knowledge is organized energy. More
..

Go or select another topic from the gold post

HyperFlight home Portal in new window 

© 2005
-- 2013 Backbone Consultants Inc. Copyrights Information

Last update August 12, 2013

www.hyperflight.com/pentagon-construct.htm#penta_via_circle 30/30