MARIA M Case Study03..

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

As an outline to the question below listed the explanation of answers together

with the captured screenshots of the excel used in computing


Step-by-step instructions
a. Inventory Turnover Ratio: 12.91 b. Receivables Turnover: 14.34 c. Competitors'
average inventory turnover is 14.79, greater than BP's. BP's inventory management
system is inefficient. It is preferable if the Inventory Turnover Ratio is higher.
BP's Receivables turnover is greater than rivals' Receivables turnover of 11.20.
The higher the Receivables Turnover Ratio, the more efficient the firm is at collecting its
receivables. If the cash conversion cycle is long, then an examination of inventory and
receivables turnover confirms BP's inefficiency.
2016 2015 2014 Inventory turnover ratio - BP 8,5 13,4 16,2
Receivable turnover ratio - BP 13,7 16,3 18,0 On average 2016-2014 Exxon Chevron
Inventory turnover ratio 11,7 13,4 Receivable turnover ratio 18,3 9,9. Between BP and
its competitors, there is a significant disparity in numbers. Inventory and receivable
turnover ratios are both falling in the BP instance. When it comes to the second
number, however, simply looking at the receivable turnover ratio, BP looks to be in a
better situation.

Thoughts to ponder
Working capital management guarantees that a business has enough
cash flow to satisfy short-term debt commitments and operating expenditures. For
many businesses, implementing a good working capital management system is a great
approach to boost profits. Ratio analysis and individual component management are the
two most important parts of working capital management. The working capital ratio,
inventory turnover, and collection ratio are three essential performance ratios of a
working capital management system. Management will use ratio analysis to identify
areas of attention, such as inventory management, cash management, accounts
receivable, and accounts payable management.
According to the evaluation, BP's poor and inefficient working capital
management causes cash to be stranded in idle assets, reducing the company's liquidity
and profitability. Efficient liquidity management entails managing and regulating current
assets and liabilities in a way that reduces the danger of not being able to fulfill due
short-term commitments and avoids over-investment in these assets. Working capital
management may have a significant impact on a company's health.

Points to consider as its advantages


- If the debtor's conversion cycle is favorable, there will be less bad debts linked
with it. As a result, the firm would not need to rely on outside agencies or
include a huge amount of uncollectible in its financials.
- To accommodate its cash conversion cycle, the company can develop an
incentive scheme. For example, if the company wants to shorten the time it
takes to collect money from debtors, it might provide incentives for immediate or
early payments.
- Older inventory in storage buildings offers a danger to the firm in terms of high
retention costs, spoiling risks, and quality degradation. If the organization can
maintain a high inventory conversion rate, it will be able to improve overall
production and business quality.
- On the other hand, a low payables conversion rate means that the company may
take advantage of the fast payment incentives given by suppliers. It also
strengthens the bond between the two parties, and the company can profit from
a quicker manufacturing cycle than its rivals.
Points to consider as its disadvantages
- The firm has a tendency to settle dues to suppliers as soon as possible in order
to guarantee that the cash conversion cycle is always positive. This eliminates
the business's ability to spend the cash it still has. Instead, it may use the cash
that will ultimately be paid toward other tasks that will help it improve the many
areas where it is falling behind.
- The cash conversion cycle isn't the most accurate indicator of a company's
efficiency. It simply refers to the time it takes for dues to be paid, which is a
strong indicator of a company's liquidity and operational sustainability. However,
there are a lot of things that aren't mentioned.
- The management considers an enhanced cash conversion cycle in comparison to
rivals to be a positive indication. However, it may lead to unwelcome
complacency in the way the firm is run in the future.
- Furthermore, depending on market conditions and changes in the business
environment, the industry's cash conversion cycle requirements are susceptible
to change. It would be foolish to cling to the old definition and acceptable norm.

You might also like