Luna vs. Nuevo Answer
Luna vs. Nuevo Answer
Luna vs. Nuevo Answer
Respondent.
X====================X
VERIFIED ANSWER
TO THE PETITION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS IN RELATION TO CUSTODY
1. Paragraphs (2), (3), (5), (7), and (19) are ADMITTED without
reservations.
10. Paragraph (15) is DENIED as the truth of the matter is different from
the actual circumstance.
11. Paragraph (16) is DENIED as the truth of the matter is different from
the actual circumstance.
15. At the time of Gavin’s birth, respondent had to resign from his job as
lubeman at Shell Gasoline Station given that he was being forced by
his supervisor to perform dangerous jobs that would be detrimental
to him. Petitioner agreed to such given that respondent was still able
to provide the needs of Gavin.
16.Four months after Gavin was born, or June 2017, respondent began
his training for his new work as a collector for the Guanzon Group of
Companies.
17.It was July 2017 when petitioner asked permission from respondent
to attend a friend’s birthday party while leaving Gavin unattended.
Luckily, respondent was present to take care of Gavin, thus,
respondent allowed petitioner to attend her friend’s birthday party.
21. Petitioner was never forced to attend the said trip as it was under her
own volition to go to such.
22. On March 8, 2018, petitioner gave birth to the twins Sofia Kylie and
Sofia Kyline. It was the family of respondent who assisted them and
settled their expenses considering no help could be derived from
petitioner’s mother as the latter was always busy with her boyfriend
from Saudi Arabia.
23. Considering that she would not be expecting help from petitioner’s
mother, respondent suggested that they stay at respondent’s house to
which petitioner agreed to.
24.Respondent and her family were considerate of petitioner, thus, they
only required her to look after the children without doing any of the
housework. Respondent helped in caring for the children. Moreover,
the aunt and uncle of respondent also helped in caring for the
children as they love their grandchildren.
27. Things went well for a while but on March 7, 2019, when Sofia Kylie
was admitted to the Philippine General Hospital, respondent
borrowed the phone of petitioner and he discovered that the latter
was having exchanges through text messages with a Rose Anne
Santiago in where petitioner stated that she had plans to renew her
relationship with a Razzel Gogola.
29.Petitioner claimed that she and Ar-Ar Bulatao got drunk and fell
asleep, when she woke up, Ar-Ar Bulatao was having sex with her.
Respondent wanted to file a charge of rape against Ar-Ar Bulatao,
but petitioner went against it. Feeling suspicious, respondent asked
petitioner to message Ar-Ar Bulatao for him to send his exchanges
with petitioner.
30. When Ar-Ar Bulantao was messaged, he replied, “Bakit? Para saan?
Kaylangan pa ba?”
31. Respondent through petitioner replied, “Isesend mo ba o
ipapakulong kita sa ginawa mo sa sa akin.”
34. Apart from these incidents, respondent knew that petitioner was
seeing other people because every time he would ask petitioner to
“make love”, petitioner would always say that they “do it at night”
but whenever night came, she would always say “No.”
35. Respondent never forced petitioner to have sex with him because of
the love and respect he felt for her.
36. From then on, things did not go well for petitioner and respondent
because apart from immorality exuded by petitioner, she was also a
poor mother to her children.
37. On March 26, 2019, the couple chose to permanently stay at the
house of Jose Jurel Nuevo, respondent’s uncle, so that Kylie’s
condition can be monitored as she was operated on her head.
38. During these times, respondent’s aunt, Rowane Sor, found out that
petitioner was very short-tempered and would not look after the
children to focus on doing things in her cellphone and play games
such as Mobile Legends.
39.There was a time when petitioner left Kylie in a toy car and instead of
looking after the child, petitioner just continuously played with her
cellphone.
40.Respondent and his family where shocked when they heard Kylie hit
and her head and saw the child crying. Respondent’s brother told
respondent, his aunt, and his uncle, that petitioner left the child at the
toy car without a helmet, and without supervision.
41.To note, Kylie needed extra attention as she was operated on her
head five (5) times.
42. Respondent’s uncle scolded petitioner and told her that the only
thing she needed to do was to watch over the children, to which she
failed to do so.
43.There were also several times that Rowane Sor would witness
petitioner throw the children at the sofa and leave them there, not
caring about them. Rowane pleaded not to do so but petitioner
would continue doing the same act.
44. Petitioner would also harm the children which Rowane caught
doing. There was a time when she witnessed Angela painfully
smacking Gavin at the back. Rowane berated petitioner for such
actions, but the latter just ignored her. Given that she harms the
children, Gavin would openly tell respondent and his family that his
mother harms him.
46. Apart from the pains he inflicts her children, petitioner says a lot of
vulgar words directed to the children.
47. In addition to the physical harm she caused to the children, as stated
above, she would neglect the children even if she wasn’t been bossed
around by anyone in the house.
48. Jose Jurel Nuevo, the uncle of respondent, would observe many
times whenever he checked on the children that petitioner would just
leave them be to play Mobile Legends or do business with her
cellphone. He would also find the room of the family in disarray as if
the petitioner did not care.
49. He also observed that whenever the children would seek attention
from their mother, the latter would ignore them and berate and shout
at them if they continue to get the attention of their mother.
56.Respondent recognizes the fact that under Article 176 of the Family
Code, illegitimate children shall be under the custody of their
mother, as an exception, however, Article 213 of the Family Code
provides that the Court may designate the parents to whom who
shall have parental authority and custody over the minor children
especially if one of the parents is deemed unfit to take care of them.
57.In Renalyn A. Masbate vs. Ricky James Relucio 1 the Supreme Court
cited what constitutes “compelling reasons to wrest away custody
from a mother over her children, to wit:
58.In the case at bar, petitioner is unfit to be the custodian of the three
children on the following grounds: (1) she is an immoral person for
having sex with other men while cohabiting with respondent, (2) she
is mentally unstable considering the fact that she has suicidal
tendencies as discovered by respondent, (3) she is unemployed and is
unable to provide for a good environment to raise the three children,
(4) she maltreats, harms, and neglects the children.
66. Third, petitioner is unemployed and could not provide the needs of
the minor children. From the beginning of their relationship, it was
respondent and his family who provides for the needs of the children
which includes their food, shelter, clothing, toys or whatever needs
they had.
67. Even during the time when one of the twins, Kylie, was operated at
the Philippine General Hospital, it was respondent and his family
who provided for everything to ensure the survival of the said child.
Petitioner and her family never gave any amount for the needs of the
children, nor did they give gifts to them.
68. More so, even the needs and wants of petitioner was provided by
respondent. Respondent readily gave what she wanted and needed.
At present, petitioner claims to be engaged in “live selling” to
provide for the children, however, such is not enough to provide for
the three children especially since Kylie has greater needs than that of
her siblings.
69. Next, the place that the children would be staying in would not be a
conducive environment for their growth. At present, petitioner
currently lives with her mother, sister, and uncle in a very small
house where they would only sleep in a tiny room with a single foam
to fit all of them, whereas respondent provides the three (3) children
with a spacious environment to live in with comfortable rooms to
stay in with the care of their grandparents.
72. Fourth, one of the issues that respondent has with petitioner is the
fact that she maltreats and hurts the children. There were several
instances when petitioner is going with her business in her mobile
phone, the children would seek her attention, she would curse at the
children and hit them, particularly the eldest child, Gavin. The eldest
child would tell his father that petitioner hit her near his shoulder
and the same happens on multiple occasions.
73. Next, there were several occasions when respondent’s aunt caught
petitioner hitting her children’s head whenever they would be active
while petitioner is combing their hair, even to Kylie, the child who
was operated on her head.
74. These two occurrences were among those that the children suffered
while at the hands of their mother who only cared about her needs
and interests, as apart from inflicting physical pain, she would also
say vulgar words to the children.
75. It is not true that petitioner endured in caring for the three (3)
children because in fact, it was respondent and his family who would
take care of them and give them the attention they need.
78. Her neglect and maltreatment of the children can be even solidified
by the fact that the children do not look for their mother when she
left the house of respondent. After the incident, whenever the eldest
child, Gavin, is asked where his mother is, he would only exclaim,
“Layas.”
79. The children can be asked who they want to be with, and they would
readily say that they want to be with their father and their
grandparents who were the actual ones who took care of them.
2
GR No. 154994, June 28, 2005
82. Respondent submits that it is in the best interest of Gavin, Kyline,
and Kylie to be under the custody of their father considering the
following factors:
82.1. It is respondent and his family that truly give care, love, support,
and time to take care of the children.
82.6. Respondent and his family do not harm and neglect the
children.
84.At present, respondent fears for the well-being of the three minors as
when he visited the children on June 19, 2021, Sofia Kyline showed
him a wound he incurred in the foot, just barely a day after the
hearing on June 18, 2021. For the safety and well-being of the
children, it is respectfully prayed for by respondent that the custody
of the children be temporarily granted to him to ensure that the
children are well-taken care of.
TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE TO BE PRESENTED
b. Jose Jurel Nuevo, the respondent’s uncle who will testify to give
support to the facts stated in this answer, and to support the
testimony of respondent and prove that petitioner neglected and
maltreated her children. Attached herewith is the Judicial Affidavit of
Jose Jurel Nuevo (ANNEX 2).
c. Rowane Sor, the respondent’s aunt who will testify to give support to
the facts stated in this answer, support the testimonies of the other
witnesses, and to prove that petitioner neglected and most especially
maltreated her children. Attached herewith is the Judicial Affidavit of
Rowane Sor (ANNEX 3).
PRAYER
b. That respondent
c. That respondent be declared to have custody and parental
authority over the minors Gavin Caleb Luna Nuevo, Sofia Kylie
Luna Nuevo, and Sofia Kyline Luna Nuevo.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise
prayed for.
RL LEGAL CONSULTANCY
Counsel for Respondent
17 Summer Street, Benedicto Compund,
Concepcion I, Marikina City 1807
[email protected]
Tel No. (02) 7624-6264
By:
Copy furnished:
I, JHON ROMEL NUEVO., Filipino citizen, of legal age and with address
above-stated, after having been sworn in accordance with law do hereby depose
and state that:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of June
2021 in Quezon City, Philippines.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, this 23rd day of June 2021,
with affiant exhibiting to me her valid identification card bearing her photograph
and signature as competent proof of her identity.