01 Definition of Internal Auditing
01 Definition of Internal Auditing
c. Participate in the drafting of recommendations for the computer acquisition and implementation.
d. Determination that the cost of extending procedures in the area would exceed the potential
benefits.
4. An internal auditor judged an item to be immaterial when planning an
assurance engagement. However, the assurance engagement may still include the
item if it is subsequently determined that
Select one:
a. Miscellaneous income is affected.
b. Adverse effects related to the item are likely to occur.
If adverse effects related to the item come to the attention of the internal auditor then it would be
considered appropriate to include these items in the engagement.
c. Internal auditing involves evaluating compliance with laws, regulations, and contracts.
d. Internal auditing has evolved to verifying the existence of assets and reviewing the means of
safeguarding assets.
d. To provide a framework within which accounting policies could be effectively developed and
executed.
7. In some countries, governmental units have established audit standards. For example, in the
United States, the General Accounting Office has developed standards for the conduct of
governmental audits, particularly those that relate to compliance with government grants. In
performing governmental grant compliance audits, the auditor should
Select one:
a. Be guided by the more general standards that have been issued by the public accounting
profession.
b. Follow both The IIA Standards and any additional governmental standards.
Rule of Conduct 4.2 states, "Internal auditors shall perform internal auditing services in accordance
with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing". In addition, the
internal auditor is obligated to follow the government’s standards when performing grant compliance
audits.
d. Be guided only by The IIA Standards because they are more encompassing.
c. Job qualification specifications that include added emphasis on background knowledge and skills.
11. Auditing standards state that "reports may include recommendations for
potential improvements. . . ." Which of the following would be a valid justification
for omitting recommendations in an audit report? The auditor
Select one:
a. Does not have sufficient time to formulate a recommendation due to audit budget pressures.
b. May lose independence by being perceived as making operational decisions.
c. May not always understand the true cause of the finding being reported.
The true cause of a finding may require additional expertise and may only be determi-nable through
additional management study.
d. Can avoid the confrontation by letting management solve its own problems.
d. Actions 2, 3, and 4.
15. The chief audit executive (CAE) of internal auditing of a mid-sized internal
auditing organization was concerned that management might outsource the internal
auditing function. Therefore, the CAE adopted a very aggressive program to promote
the internal auditing department within the organization. The CAE planned to present
the results to management and the audit committee and recommend modification of
the Internal Audit Charter after using the new program. The following lists six actions
the CAE took to promote a positive image within the organization: 1. Audit
assignments concentrated on economy and efficiency audits. The audits focused
solely on cost savings and each audit report highlighted potential costs to be saved.
Negative findings were omitted. The focus on economy and efficiency audits was new,
but the auditees seemed very happy. 2. Drafts of all audit reports were carefully
reviewed with the auditee to get their input. Their comments were carefully
considered when developing the final audit report. 3. The EDP auditor participated as
part of a development team to review the control procedures to be incorporated into
a major computer application under development. 4. Given limited resources, the
CAE performed a risk analysis to determine which locations to audit. This was a
marked departure from the previous approach of ensuring that all operations are
reviewed on at least a three-year interval. 5. In order to save time, the CAE no longer
required that a standard internal control questionnaire be completed for each audit.
6. When the auditors found that management and the auditee had not developed
specific criteria or data to evaluate the operations of the auditee, the audit team was
instructed to perform research, develop specific criteria, review the criteria with the
auditee, and if acceptable, use it to evaluate the auditees operations. If the auditee
disagreed with the criteria, a negotiation took place until acceptable criteria could be
agreed upon. The audit report commented on the auditees operations in conjunction
with the agreed-upon criteria.Is Action 5 a violation of the Standards?
Select one:
a. No. Auditors are not required to fill out internal control questionnaires on every audit.
Auditors are not required to perform control evaluations and certainly are not required to fill out
standard internal control questionnaires.
b. Yes. Internal control should be evaluated on every audit engagement and the internal control
questionnaire is the most efficient method to do so.
c. Yes. Internal control should be evaluated on every audit, but the internal control questionnaire is
not the mandated approach to evaluate the controls.
d. No. Auditors may omit necessary procedures if there is a time constraint. It is a matter of audit
judgment.
16. The chief audit executive (CAE) of internal auditing of a mid-sized internal
auditing organization was concerned that management might outsource the internal
auditing function. Therefore, the CAE adopted a very aggressive program to promote
the internal auditing department within the organization. The CAE planned to present
the results to management and the audit committee and recommend modification of
the Internal Audit Charter after using the new program. The following lists six actions
the CAE took to promote a positive image within the organization: 1. Audit
assignments concentrated on economy and efficiency audits. The audits focused
solely on cost savings and each audit report highlighted potential costs to be saved.
Negative findings were omitted. The focus on economy and efficiency audits was new,
but the auditees seemed very happy. 2. Drafts of all audit reports were carefully
reviewed with the auditee to get their input. Their comments were carefully
considered when developing the final audit report. 3. The EDP auditor participated as
part of a development team to review the control procedures to be incorporated into
a major computer application under development. 4. Given limited resources, the
CAE performed a risk analysis to determine which locations to audit. This was a
marked departure from the previous approach of ensuring that all operations are
reviewed on at least a three-year interval. 5. In order to save time, the CAE no longer
required that a standard internal control questionnaire be completed for each audit.
6. When the auditors found that management and the auditee had not developed
specific criteria or data to evaluate the operations of the auditee, the audit team was
instructed to perform research, develop specific criteria, review the criteria with the
auditee, and if acceptable, use it to evaluate the auditee's operations. If the auditee
disagreed with the criteria, a negotiation took place until acceptable criteria could be
agreed upon. The audit report commented on the auditee's operations in conjunction
with the agreed-upon criteria.Regarding Action 6, which of the following elements of
the action would be considered a violation of the Standards?
Select one:
a. Commenting on the agreed-upon criteria.
b. All of the above.
c. Failing to report the lack of criteria to appropriate level of management.
Failing to report the lack of criteria would be a violation of the Standards. The lack of established
criteria should be reported to the appropriate levels of management. This would normally be one
level above the auditee. The negotiated formulation of the criteria may result in the correct criteria,
but it should be discussed with, and communicated to, the appropriate level of management.
d. Developing a set of criteria to present to the auditee as a basis for evaluating the auditee's
operations.
17. The purposes of the Standards include all of the following except
Select one:
a. Delineating basic principles that represent the practice of internal auditing as it should be.
b. Guiding the ethical conduct of internal auditors.
Guiding the ethical conduct of the internal auditors is not one of the four purposes of the Standards.
The four purposes include: (1) Delineate basic principles that represent the practice of internal
auditing as it should be; (2) Provide a framework for performing and promoting a broad range of
value-added internal audit activities; (3) Establish the basis for the measurement of internal audit
performance; and (4) Foster improved organizational processes and operations.
18. Accepting the concept that internal auditing should be an integral part of an
organization can involve a major change of attitude on the part of top
management. Which of the following would be the best way for internal auditors
to convince management regarding the need for and benefits of internal auditing?
Select one:
a. Persuading top managers to accept the idea of internal audits by contacting company
shareholders and regulatory agencies.
b. Involving top management in deciding which audit findings will be reported.
c. Negotiating with top management to provide them with rewards, such as favorable audits.
d. Educating top managers about the benefits and communicating with them on a regular basis.
Education and communication, although lengthy and costly, are the only way to achieve long-term
results.
19. As used by the internal auditing profession, the Standards refers to all of the
following except
Select one:
a. Criteria which dictate the minimum level of ethical actions to be taken by internal auditors.
The Code of Ethics defines the minimum ethical standards for the internal auditor, not the
Standards.
20. The purpose of the Standards includes all of the following except
Select one:
a. Outline the basic principles that represent best practice of internal auditing.
b. Foster improved organizational processes and operations.
c. To establish the basis for the CIA certification program.
The primary purpose of the Standards is to establish a basis for measuring and guiding internal audit
operations, not establishing the CIA certification program.
d. Provide a framework for performing and promoting a broad range of value-added internal audit
activities.
21. The interpretation related to quality assurance given by the Standards is that
Select one:
a. The internal audit activity is primarily measured against the Institute's Code of Ethics.
b. Continual supervision is limited to the planning, examination, evaluation, communication, and
follow-up process.
c. External assessments can provide senior management and the board with independent assurance
about the quality of the internal audit activity.
External assessments of an IAA contain an expressed opinion as to the entire spectrum of
assurance and consulting work performed (or that should have been performed based on the
internal audit charter) by the IAA, including its conformance with the Definition of Internal Auditing,
the Code of Ethics, and the Standards and, as appropriate, includes recommendations for
improvement. These assessments can have considerable value to the CAE and other members of
the IAA, especially when benchmarking and best practices are shared (PA 1312-1.2).
d. Appropriate follow-up to an external assessment is the responsibility of the chief audit executive's
immediate supervisor.
22. The benefits from internal auditing include all of the following except
Select one:
a. Management benefits because the internal audit activity is able to help them identify and minimize
risks.
b. Employees benefit because the internal audit activity can help them effectively perform their jobs.
c. The external auditor benefits because the internal audit activity is able to provide an opinion about
the accuracy and completeness of the annual financial statements.
Internal auditors are not able to provide an opinion about the accuracy and completeness of the
annual financial statement. This is solely the responsibility of the external auditor.
d. Society benefits from internal auditing because the internal auditor promotes the efficient and
effective use of resources.