Scribd
Upload
237 views2 pages

Anova Two Way

The document describes using a two-way ANOVA method to analyze sales data from a tea company with 4 salesmen over 3 seasons. The analysis found: 1) There was no significant difference in performance between the 4 salesmen. 2) There was no significant difference in sales between the 3 seasons.

Uploaded by

Nikhitha Adluri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
237 views2 pages

Anova Two Way

The document describes using a two-way ANOVA method to analyze sales data from a tea company with 4 salesmen over 3 seasons. The analysis found: 1) There was no significant difference in performance between the 4 salesmen. 2) There was no significant difference in sales between the 3 seasons.

Uploaded by

Nikhitha Adluri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ANOVA TWO WAY METHOD:

A tea company appoints four sales men A,B,C,D and observes their sales in three seasons- Summer,
winter and Monsoon. The figures(in lakhs) are given in the following table:

Seasons Salesmen
A B C D
Summer 36 36 21 35
Winter 28 29 31 32
Monsoo 26 28 29 29
n

1. Do the salesmen significantly differ in the performance?


2. Is there a significant difference between the seasons?

Sol)

For columns: Salesmen


H0: There is no significant difference in the performance of salesmen.
H1: There is a significant difference in the performance of sales men.

For rows: Seasons


Ho: There is no significant difference in the performance of sales men on the basis of seasons.
H1: There is a significant difference in the performance of salesmen on the basis of seasons.

Level of significance: At 5 % level of significance,


For rows(seasons): df = (r-1) , (r-1) (c-1) = (3-1), (3-1) (4-1) = 2,6 => Ftab = 5.14
For columns(salesmen): df= (c-1), (r-1)(c-1) = (4-1), (3-1)(4-1)= 3,6 =>Ftab = 4.76

Applying the procedure of ANOVA of two way classification:

Step1: Taking 21 as source and subtracting all the values with 21, we get the revised table.

Seasons Salesmen
A B C D TOTAL
Summer 15 15 0 14 44
Winter 7 8 10 11 36
Monsoo 5 7 8 8 28
n
Total 27 30 18 33 108
Step2: Correction factor for the given data: CF= T 2/N = (108)2/12 = 972
(27) ² + (30)² + (18)² + (33)² -
Step3: Sum of squares between columns(SSC) = CF
3 3 3 3
SSC = 243+300+108+363-972 = 42
(44) ² + (36) ² + (28) ²
Step4: Sum of squares between rows (SSR) = - CF
4 4 4
SSR =484+324+196-972 = 32
Step5: Total sum of squares (TSS) =
[(15)2+(15)2+(0)2+(14)2+(7)2+(8)2+(10)2+(11)2+(5)2+(7)2+(8)2+(8)2] –CF
TSS = 1182-972 = 210
Step6: Residual Error (or) Sum of Squares between Errors (SSE) =
SSE = TSS-(SSC+SSR)
SSE = 210-(42+32) = 136
Step7: ANOVA table is given by:
Source of variation Sum of Df Mean Squares F-ratio
squares
Columns(Salesmen) 42 (c-1) = 4-1 = MSC =SSC/DF = Fcal =MSC/MSE =
3 42/3 =14 14/22.66 = 0.617
Rows (seasons) 32 (r-1) = (3-1) MSR = SSR/DF = Fcal = MSR/MSE =
=2 32/2 = 16 16/22.66 = 0.706
Errors (residual 136 (r-1)(c-1) = MSE = SSE/DF =
error) (3-1)(4-1) =6 136/6 =22.66

For sales men: Fcal = 0.617, Ftab = 4.76, there fore : Fcal<Ftab , we accept H0.
Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the performance of salesmen

For seasons: Fcal = 0.706, F tab = 5.14, therefore: Fcal< Ftab, we accept H0.
Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the performance of sales men on the basis of
seasons.

1.The following table gives the number of refrigerators sold by four salesmen in 3 months, May,
June, July.

Mont Salesman
h

A B C D

May 50 40 48 39

June 46 48 50 45

July 39 44 40 39

1. Is there a significant difference in the sales made by the four sales men?
2. Is there a significant difference in the sales made during different months?

You might also like