Communicative Language Testing: Conference Paper
Communicative Language Testing: Conference Paper
net/publication/343098732
CITATIONS READS
0 569
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Rafael Sharifovich Akhmedov on 21 July 2020.
Akhmedov R.Sh.
Gulistan State University
-29-
according to the communicative approach, then tests must be designed
accordingly [3]. However a lot of teachers believe that communicative tests are
hard to prepare. In fact various challenging difficulties emerge when teachers
develop communicative tests [5].
1. One crucial concern is the problem of developing useful assessment
instruments which can be employed accurately and efficiently in a range of typical
classroom situations.
2. Another challenge is to develop a framework which is based on
attending to the theoretical requirements of both communicative teaching goals
and test design principles.
3. There are also difficulties associated with the English as a Foreign
Language context. While communicative theory emphasizes the importance of
using authentic materials and of practicing meaningful communication in realistic
social situations, these goals are almost impossible to achieve in EFL settings.
4. The EFL settings make impossible for learners to consolidate and
practice what is learned in the classroom in real world situations which makes it
very difficult to develop communicative tests.
5. The extent to which it is possible to achieve the goal of meaningful
communication remains entirely unclear, given the contextual requirement for
simulating foreign interactions in EFL classrooms.
6. Communicative tests must also reflect contemporary theory concerning
test design principles – validity, reliability, and practicality. I there is a lack of
direct correlation between theory and practice, some specific discrepancies
between test-design principles and efficiency requirements may occur.
7. Some teachers contend that it is inevitable that rating communicative
tests may be subjective as it is difficult to distinguish right from wrong responses
in real life situations [6].
References
1. Brown, H.D. Language Assessment. –New York: Pearson Education, 2004. –pp.3-324.
2. Harsono, M.Y. Developing Communicative Language Test for Senior High School. //
TEFLIN Journal, Vol. 16, #2, 2005. –pp.6-13.
3. Hughes, A. Testing for Language Teachers. –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1992. –pp.1-165.
4. Jianda, Liu. Assessing EFL Learners’ Interlanguage Pragmatic Knowledge:
Implications for Testers and Teachers. // ELT Journal, Vol. 5, #1, 2013. –pp.1-22.
5. Rhalmi, M. Communicative Tests. // ELT Journal, Vol 2, #5, 2010. –pp.49-51.
6. Sun, Dongyun. From Communicative Competence to Interactional Competence: A New
Outlook to the Teaching of Spoken English. // Journal of Language Teaching and
Research, Vol. 5, #5, 2014. –pp.1062-1070.
-30-