Summary of Findings, Conclusion and Recommendation
Summary of Findings, Conclusion and Recommendation
This chapter presents the summary of the research findings, the conclusion drawn
sought to know the performance of the respondent in pretest and posttest and the
The data was statistically treated using 2 sample Z-test between the fill-me-up
Summary of Findings
This study determined the significant difference of using fill-me-up strategy on the
academic performance of the grade four pupils in science. The study emphasized the
questions on; the level of the pupil’s performance when taught using fill-me-up and
those who are taught using the traditional method of teaching; and the significant
difference in the academic performance of the pupils who are taught using the fill-me-up
strategy and those who are taught using the traditional method of teaching.
The study used the 2 sample Z-test as statistical tool for the two independent
samples to measure and evaluates the data gathered in the study. The respondents
were the thirty (30) grade five Experimental students and thirty (30) grade five Control
students of Dalirig Central Elementary School S.Y 2019-2020. In gathering the data, the
researchers used a questionnaire; the questionnaire was used both in pretest and post-
test. Before the discussion, the researchers presented the pretest in order to know if
both groups have the same level of intelligence. After tackling all the lessons, the
respondents were given the same 40-items test in both the traditional and Fill-me-up
method of teaching.
Looking at the post-test data the researchers found out that in the traditional
method of instruction, 27 or 90% of the pupils did not meet expectation or still in the
and 1 or 3.3% have very satisfactory performance or proficient. Meanwhile the students
who are taught using the Fill-me-up strategy have 18 or 60% of the pupils did not meet
level.
performance of using the fill-me-up strategy and the traditional method of teaching. The
researcher used the 2 sample Z-test, with 95% confidence level or α=0.05 level of
significance.
The study shows that there is significant difference in the academic performance
in science using the fill-me-up strategy and those who are taught using the traditional
method.
Conclusion
The result of this study on Fill-me-up as a strategy in enhancing pupil’s interest and
academic performance in science of pupils using fill-me-up strategy and those who are
Recommendations
Based on the result of the study, the researchers would like to give
Pupils. The result of this study may give insight to the pupils the importance of taking
down notes that would affect better in their performance in Science. This will also give
them the idea that there are different ways of taking down notes, which may suit with
their taste.
Parents. This study may give them the ideas on how to improve the performance of
their child in school towards Science in terms of taking down notes. Since parents are
the first teacher that educate their children, their guidance and support in motivating
their child is very important to better learning attainment as well encourage them to do
Faculty and staff. The result of this study gives an idea on the status of the pupils in
terms of their interest in their teaching learning process motivates them to perform
better. This will give them an idea on how to improve the pupil’s performance by doing
some interventions to improve interest of the pupils towards learning. This further gives
them insights in what programs they may implement in order to improve their
performance. Moreover, teachers should provide pupils with varied strategies for the
Future Researchers. This study will help the researchers gain knowledge and more
facts about note taking and the factors in using strategy, which further affects pupils’
performance. In line with this study, the researchers can make some revision
considering some variables that are not included in the study. More importantly, this
study serves as a baseline data for future researchers who will conduct related studies.