Scribd
Upload
64 views1 page

US V Tambunting

Manuel Tambunting and his wife occupied an upper floor of a house where the Manila Gas Corporation had previously installed a gas line. The gas company disconnected the line and removed the meter after the previous occupants vacated. An inspector later discovered Manuel using gas for cooking without the gas company's consent. The court ruled that gas can be subject to larceny as it is a valuable commodity that is bought and sold like other personal property.

Uploaded by

Zirk Tan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
64 views1 page

US V Tambunting

Manuel Tambunting and his wife occupied an upper floor of a house where the Manila Gas Corporation had previously installed a gas line. The gas company disconnected the line and removed the meter after the previous occupants vacated. An inspector later discovered Manuel using gas for cooking without the gas company's consent. The court ruled that gas can be subject to larceny as it is a valuable commodity that is bought and sold like other personal property.

Uploaded by

Zirk Tan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

US v Tambunting

Facts:

Manuel and his wife were occupants of the upper floor of a house. In this house the Manila Gas
Corporation had previously installed apparatus for the delivery of gas on both the upper and lower floors.

When the occupants who requested the installation vacated the premises, the gas company
disconnected the gas pipe and removed the meter, thus cutting off the supply of gas from said
premises.

Subsequently, one of the inspectors of the gas company visited the house and found that gas was being
used, without the knowledge and consent of the gas company, for cooking
in the quarters occupied by the defendant and his wife

Issue:

Whether gas can be subject to larceny

Ruling:

Yes.

There is nothing in the nature of gas used for illuminating purposes which renders it incapable of
being feloniously taken and carried away. It is a valuable article of merchandise, bought and sold like
other personal property, susceptible of being severed from a mass or larger quantity and of being
transported from place to place. Likewise water which is confined in pipes and electricity which is
conveyed by wires are subjects of larceny."

You might also like