Creativity: Flow and The Psychology of Discovery and Invention
Creativity: Flow and The Psychology of Discovery and Invention
Creativity: Flow and The Psychology of Discovery and Invention
This is a fascinating book by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi one of the less well known but
probably one of the most serious management scholars of recent times. He brings
out the importance of creativity, outlines its building blocks and explains how we can
all become more creative.
Introduction
Understanding Creativity
When we use the term creativity, different images come to our mind. There are
bright persons who express unusual thoughts, who are interesting and stimulating.
Unless they also contribute something of permanent significance, these people must
be called brilliant rather than creative.
2
Then there are people who experience the world in novel and original ways. These
are individuals whose perceptions are fresh, whose judgments are insightful, who
may make important discoveries. The author calls such people personally creative.
Finally, there are individuals who, change our culture in some important respect.
They are the creative ones without qualifications.
Creativity, as mentioned before, consists of three main parts. The first of these is the
domain, which consists of a set of symbolic rules and procedures.
The second component of creativity is the field, which includes all the individuals
who act as gatekeepers to the domain. They decide whether a new idea or product
can be accepted. For example, in the visual arts, the field consists of art teachers,
curators of museums, collectors of art, critics, and administrators of foundations and
government agencies that deal with culture. These people decide what new works of
art must be recognised, preserved, and remembered.
The third component is the individual, who using symbols of a given domain, comes
up with a new idea or sees a new pattern. His or her thoughts or actions change a
domain, or establish a new domain.
The level of creativity in a given place at a given time does not depend only on the
amount of individual creativity. It depends just as much on how well suited the
respective domains and fields are to the recognition and diffusion of novel ideas.
Domain
Each domain is made up of its own symbolic elements, its own rules, and generally
has its own system of notation. In many ways, each domain describes an isolated
little world in which a person can think and act with clarity and concentration. The
existence of a domain is perhaps the best evidence of human creativity. Domains
create order that is not programmed into our genes by biological evolution.
There are several ways in which domains can help or hinder creativity. Three major
dimensions are particularly relevant: the clarity of structure, the centrality within the
culture, and accessibility.
Field
A field is necessary to determine the worth of a new idea. No culture can assimilate
all the novelty people produce without dissolving into chaos.
Fields can affect the rate of creativity in three ways. The first way is by being either
reactive or proactive. A reactive field does not solicit or stimulate novelty.
The second way is the approach to screening new ideas. Some fields are
conservative and allow only a few new items to enter the domain at any new given
time. They reject most novelty and select only what they consider best. Others are
more liberal in allowing new ideas into their domains.
Finally, fields can encourage novelty if they are well connected to the rest of the
social system and are able to channel support into their own domain.
Domains and fields affect each other in various ways. Sometimes domains determine
to a large extent what the field can or cannot do. This is probably more usual in the
sciences, where the knowledge has several restrictions on what is possible. In the
arts, on the other hand, it is often the field that takes precedence. The artistic
establishment, without firm guidelines anchored in the past, evaluates new works of
art.
Being in the right place at the right time is an important part of creativity. But to
know that one is indeed staring at an opportunity needs a prepared mind. Many
people never realise that they are surrounded by favourable circumstances and even
fewer know what to do when the realization hits them.
Creative individuals are remarkable for their ability to adapt to different situations
and to manage with whatever is needed to reach their goals. If nothing else, this
distinguishes them from the rest of us. But there does not seem to be a particular set
of traits that a person must have in order to be creative.
Although most great scientists seem to have been attracted to numbers and
experimentation early in life, how creative they eventually became, bears little
relationship to how talented they were as children. However, a special sensory
4
advantage may be responsible for developing an early interest in the domain, which
is certainly an important ingredient of creativity.
A person also needs access to a domain. Luck does play a big role. Being born in an
affluent family or being close to good schools, mentors, and coaches obviously is a
great advantage. But, luck is not everything. Many creative people have shown
extraordinary pluck and determination to get access to a domain.
Access to a field is equally important. Some people are terribly knowledgeable but
they find it so difficult to communicate with those who matter among their peers
that they are ignored or shunned in the formative years of their careers.
Someone who is not known or appreciated by the relevant people has a very difficult
time accomplishing something that will be seen as creative. Such a person may not
have a chance to access the latest information, may not be given the opportunity to
work, and if he or she does manage to accomplish something novel, that novelty is
likely to be ignored or ridiculed. In the sciences, being at the right university is
extremely important.
What makes creative people different from others is complexity. They show
tendencies of thought and action that in most people are segregated. Having a
complex personality means being able to express the full range of traits that are
potentially present in the human repertoire but usually atrophy because we think
that one extreme is “good,” whereas the other extreme is “bad.”
Most of us have a repressed shadow side that we refuse to acknowledge. The very
orderly person may long to be spontaneous, the submissive person wishes to be
dominant. As long as we disown these shadows, we can never be satisfied. But we
usually do this and keep on struggling against ourselves, trying to live up to an image
that distorts our true being. A complex personality involves the ability to move from
one extreme to the other as the occasion requires.
Creative individuals have a great deal of physical energy. They work long hours, with
great concentration, while projecting an aura of freshness and enthusiasm. But the
energy of these people is internally generated and is due more to their focused
minds than to the superiority of their genes.
Creative persons are not necessarily hyperactive. In fact, they often take rests and
sleep a lot. But when they are working, their energy is under their own control.
When necessary they can focus it like a laser beam. When it is not, they immediately
start recharging their batteries. They consider the rhythm of activity followed by
idleness or reflection very important for the success of their work.
Creative individuals tend to be smart, yet also naïve at the same time. Low
intelligence can undermine creativity. But being intellectually brilliant can also be
detrimental to creativity. People with high IQs may get complacent. Secure in their
mental superiority, they lose the curiosity essential to achieving anything new. If
5
learning facts and understanding the existing rules of domains, comes too easily to a
high-IQ person, there may be no incentive to question, doubt, and improve on
existing knowledge.
Furthermore, people who bring about an acceptable novelty in a domain seem able
to use well two opposite ways of thinking: the convergent and the divergent.
Convergent thinking involves solving well-defined, rational problems that have one
correct answer. Divergent thinking leads to no agreed upon solution. It involves the
ability to generate a great quantity of ideas; to switch from one perspective to
another; and to pack unusual associations of ideas. Divergent thinking is not much
use without the ability to tell a good idea from a bad one – and the selectivity
involves convergent thinking. Many creative individuals have only two or three good
ideas in their entire career, but they are so good that they keep these people busy
for a lifetime.
Creative individuals alternate between imagination and fantasy at one end, and a
rooted sense of reality at the other. They break away from the present without
losing touch with the past.
Such people also show shades of both extroversion and introversion. Usually each of
us tends to be one or the other, either preferring to be in the thick of crowds or
sitting on the sidelines. Creative individuals, on the other hand, seem to express
opposing traits at the same time.
These individuals are well aware of the scholars who have preceded them and their
contributions. They also are aware of the role that luck has played in their own
achievements. And they are usually so focused on future projects and current
challenges that their past accomplishments, no matter how outstanding, are no
longer very interesting to them. At the same time, creative individuals know that in
comparison with others they have accomplished a great deal. So they display a sense
of security and self-assurance.
Creative individuals are also able to manage the paradox between ambition and
selflessness. They can be simultaneously ambitious and aggressive and willing to
subordinate their own personal comfort and advancement to the success of the
projects they are working on.
These are psychologically androgynous people who can interact with the world in
terms of a much richer and varied spectrum of opportunities. Creative individuals
often have not only the strengths of their own gender but those of the other one,
too. For example, creative girls often tend to be more dominant and tough than
other girls, and creative boys are more sensitive and less aggressive than their male
6
peers. Similarly, women artists and scientists tend to be much more assertive, self-
confident, and openly aggressive than typical women. At the same time, creative
men display feminity through their great preoccupation with their family and their
sensitivity to subtle aspects of the environment.
Most creative persons are very passionate about their work, yet they can be
extremely objective about it is well. Passion is needed to sustain interest in a difficult
task. But without objectivity, the work may lack credibility and not find enough
takers.
The openness and sensitivity of creative individuals often exposes them to suffering
and pain, yet also a great deal of enjoyment. The suffering is easy to understand.
Their greater sensitivity can cause slights and anxieties that are not usually felt by
the rest of us. Perhaps the most important quality of creative individuals, is the
ability to enjoy the process of creation for its own sake. That is why these people
forgo more lucrative career opportunities to remain focused on what they like to do.
The second phase is a period of incubation, during which ideas churn around below
the threshold of consciousness. It is during this time that unusual connections are
likely to be made. Because of its mysterious quality, incubation has often been
thought the most creative part of the entire process. What happens in this “dark”
space defies ordinary analysis and evokes the original mystery shrouding the work of
genius. How long a period of incubation is needed varies depending on the nature of
the problem. It may range from a few hours to several weeks and even longer.
The third component of the creative process is insight, when the pieces of the puzzle
fall together.
The fourth component is evaluation, i.e., deciding whether the insight is valuable
and worth pursuing. This is often the most emotionally trying part of the process,
when one feels most uncertain and insecure. Is this idea really novel, or is it obvious?
7
The fifth and last component of the process is elaboration. This stage takes up the
most time and involves the hardest work. After an insight occurs, one must validate
it. Most lovely insights never go any farther because under the cold light of reason,
fatal flaws appear. But if everything checks out, the slow and often routine work of
elaboration begins.
There are four main conditions that are important during this stage of the process.
First of all, the person must pay attention to the developing work. Next, one must
pay attention to one’s goals and feelings, to know whether the work is indeed
proceeding as intended. The third condition is to keep in touch with domain
knowledge, to use the most effective techniques, the fullest information, and the
best theories as one proceeds. And finally, it is important to listen to colleagues in
the field to get a sense that things are moving in the right direction and also make
the most effective sales pitch.
Usually insights tend to come to prepared minds, that is, to those who have thought
long and hard about a given set of problematic issues. There are three main sources
from which problems typically arise; personal experiences, requirements of the
domain, and social pressures.
The inspiration for a creative solution usually comes from a conflict in the domain
Every domain has its own internal logic, its pattern of development, and those who
work within it must respond to this logic. An intellectual problem may not be
restricted to a particular domain. Indeed, some of the most creative breakthroughs
occur when an idea that works well in one domain is transplanted in another. Many
creative people are inspired by a gap or discrepancy in their domain that becomes
obvious when looked at from the perspective of another domain. And then there are
people who sense problems in “real” life that cannot be accommodated within the
symbolic system of any existing domain.
Creative persons differ from one another in a variety of ways, but in one respect
they are same. They love what they do. Creative individuals internalize the field’s
criteria of judgement to the extent that they have the ability to separate bad ideas
from good ones, so that they don’t waste much time exploring blind alleys. The flow
experience has the following building blocks:
Focus and concentration hold the key to achieving flow. Many of the peculiarities
attributed to creative persons are really just ways to maintain concentration and
lose themselves in the creative process. Distraction interrupts flow and it may take
hours to recover the peace of mind one needs to get on with the work. The more
ambitious the task, the longer it takes to lose oneself in it, and the easier it is to get
distracted.
When we are in flow, we do not usually feel happy – for the simple reason that in
flow we feel only what is relevant to the activity. Happiness is a distraction. It is only
after we get out of flow, at the end of a session or in moments of distraction within
it, that we might indulge in feeling happy. And then there is the rush of well-being, of
satisfaction that comes when the work is completed. In the long run, the more flow
we experience in daily life, the more likely we are to feel happy overall.
Twenty-five centuries ago, Plato wrote that the most important task for a society
was to teach the young to find pleasure in the right objects. Unfortunately, it is
easier to find pleasure in things like sex, eating, mating, making money, etc because
these activities are in synchrony with survival strategies established long ago in our
physiological makeup. It is much more difficult to learn to enjoy doing things that
were discovered recently in our evolution, like manipulating symbolic systems by
doing math or science or writing poetry or music.
Creative Surroundings
The place where one lives is important for three main reasons. One must be able to
access the domain in which one plans to work. Information is not distributed evenly
in space but is concentrated in different geographical nodes. Certain environments
facilitate interaction and provide more excitement and a greater effervescence of
ideas. Therefore, they prompt the persons who are already inclined to break away
9
from conventions to experiment with novelty more readily. For example, the closer
one is to the major research laboratories, journals, departments, institutes, and
conference centers, the greater the chances of being creative. Sometimes sudden
availability of money at a certain place attracts artists or scientists and that place
becomes, at least for a while, one of the centres of the field.
Our workplace and home should reflect our needs and tastes. The objects around us
should help us become what we intend to be. How we use time and how we
schedule our activities should reflect the rhythm that work best for us. If in doubt we
must experiment until we discover the best timing for work and rest, for thought and
action, for being alone and for being with people.
It is impossible to tell whether children will be creative or not just by looking at their
early talents. Some children do show signs of extraordinary precocity in some
domain or other.
But creativity involves changing a way of doing or looking at things and that in turn
requires mastery of the old ways of doing or thinking. No matter how precocious
children are, this they cannot do. The earlier years provide at best only glimpses of
extraordinary ability in the domain they eventually turned to.
Creativity can be boosted through early exposure to the wealth and variety of life.
The family plays an important role. Parents can encourage the pursuit of knowledge,
instil intellectual discipline, and introduce their children to career opportunities and
facilitate access to the field. They can also play a crucial role in shaping character. In
many cases parents are the main source of the curiosity and involvement with life
that is so characteristic of these creative individuals.
Many creative people lost their fathers early in life. But there are also examples of a
warm and stimulating family context. So we cannot conclude that hardship or
conflicts are necessary to unleash the creative urge. In fact, creative individuals seem
to have had either exceptionally supportive childhoods or very deprived and
challenging ones. What appears to be missing is the vast middle ground.
It seems schools do not have much impact on the lives of creative people. Schools
seem to extinguish the interest and curiosity that the child had discovered outside its
walls. At the same time, individual teachers often awaken, sustain, or direct a child’s
10
interest. These teachers take note of the student’s potential. They give the child
extra work to do and provide greater challenges compared to the rest of the class.
When we study the lives of creative people we find all kinds of patterns. Some were
precocious – almost prodigious – and others had a normal childhood. Some had
difficult early years, lost a parent, or experienced various forms of hardship; others
had lost a family member. A few even had normal childhoods. Some encountered
supportive teachers; others were ignored and had bad experiences with mentors.
There were some who knew early in life what career they would pursue, while
others changed their direction as they matured. Recognition came early to some and
late to others.
In short, genes or the events of early life alone do not shape the likes of creative
people. Rather, over time, creative people make do with whatever came to hand.
Instead of being shaped by events, they shape events to suit their purposes.
Curiosity and drive are in many ways the yin and the yang that need to be combined
for becoming creative. Curiosity requires openness to outside stimuli. It is playful and
deals with objects and ideas for their own sake. Drive needs inner focus, seriousness,
competitive spirit and achievement orientation. The curiosity and commitment of
creative people often directs them to confront the social and political problems that
most people are too content to leave alone.
Famous creative people also have to cope with the demands the environment places
on them. There are many administrative positions in which a respected name is a
great asset. Government agencies and private foundations like to have them on
board. More than money, or power, it is the feeling that there is something
important that needs to be done and that they are the people who can do it, that
prompts creative people to take up such assignments.
But creative people keep themselves meaningfully occupied all the time. They never
seem to have surplus time. They do not easily get bored. Nor do they spend even a
few minutes doing something they don’t believe is worthwhile.
Creative Aging
There are two kinds of intelligence. The first is fluid intelligence, or the ability to
respond rapidly, to have quick reaction times, to compute fast and accurately. This
type of intelligence is innate and is little affected by learning. Its various components
11
peak early – teens, twenty’s or thirty’s. Each later decade shows some decrease in
these skills, and after age seventy, the decline is usually quite severe even among
otherwise healthy individuals.
As they grow older, creative people may find themselves under much pressure with
too little time, often due to over commitment. Physical fitness is another concern.
On the other hand, with age there is less anxiety over performance, and more
display of courage, confidence, and risk taking. With age it is also possible to occupy
a central position in the field, or to develop new forms of association, especially with
students.
The promise of more and different knowledge never lets down creative individuals.
They can lose physical energy and cognitive skills, but symbolic domains remain
always accessible and their rewards remain fresh till the end of life. Many creative
people take full advantage of changes in the domain. Creative individuals see age in
a positive light, because they are still deeply involved in exciting and rewarding tasks.
Erik Erikson refers to the last psychological stage of life as achieving integrity. If we
live long enough and resolve all the earlier tasks of adulthood – then there is a last
remaining task that is essential for our full development as a human being. This
consists in bringing together into a meaningful story our past and present, and in
reconciling ourselves with the approaching end of life. Many creative people seem to
fall in this category.
Creative people often blend pride in family with pride in work. Many of them are
also driven by a feeling of responsibility for the common good. But they shoulder this
as a privilege rather than a duty. Although they work hard to help improve our lives,
they claim that they mostly enjoy what they do.
Nurturing Creativity
The human species could not survive, either now or in the years to come, if creativity
were to run dry. At the same time, the main threats to our survival as a species, the
very problems we hope creativity will solve, were brought about by yesterday’s
creative solutions.
Human well-being hinges on two factors: the ability to increase creativity and the
ability to develop better ways to evaluate the impact of new creative ideas. Leaving
this to individuals or market forces may not be the right thing to do always. Each
field expects society to recognize its autonomy, yet each feels accountable only to
12
itself, according to the rules of its own domain. It is also doubtful that decisions left
to the free market would be wise as far as our future well-being is concerned.
Market decisions tend to be oriented to the present, with little concern for
consequences.
We need to find ways that encourage creativity on the basis of the future well-being
of the whole, not just of the separate fields. The greatest art, East or West, was not
produced when the artists set the agenda, but when patrons insisted on certain
standards.
A creative person must have a great deal of curiosity and openness on the one hand,
and an almost obsessive perseverance on the other. How can we increase the
number of people with both these characteristics?
Biological inheritance is only part of the story. Early background has a significant
effect. Interest and curiosity tend to be stimulated by positive experiences with
family, by a supportive emotional environment, by a rich cultural heritage, by
exposure to many opportunities, and by high expectations. In contrast, perseverance
seems to develop as a response to a precarious emotional environment, a
dysfunctional family, a feeling of rejection and marginality. Creative individuals seem
more likely to have been exposed to both circumstances.
A milieu that encourages both solitude and gregariousness may boost creativity.
Children who have not learned to tolerate solitude often fail to develop enough in-
depth involvement in a domain and tap opportunities to reflect and incubate ideas.
On the other hand, children who are too shy and reclusive find it difficult to sell their
ideas to others.
A certain flexibility about gender roles is likely to help. If a child is too strongly
socialized to act in terms of a strict gender stereotype, its creativity is likely to be
inhibited. A child who is encouraged to question, is likely to develop a problem-
finding attitude. A child who is introduced to inductive reasoning may have an
advantage in making sense of the world. Above all else, it helps to become involved
in a domain early.
Even when not directly integrated in one’s work, other domains contribute to the
overall mental life of creative individuals. Breadth of knowledge is one of the most
important qualities that are being ignored today. Excessively, narrow specialization
reduces the likelihood of making creative contributions that will enrich the culture.
Most of us deep down believe that a person who is creative, will prevail regardless of
the environment. But this is not really true. Circumstances do matter. Favourable
convergences in time and place open up a brief window of opportunity for the
person who, happens to be in the right place at the right time.
The author lists major elements in the social milieu that can encourage creativity:
training, expectations, resources, recognition, hope, opportunity, and reward.
13
A society that can match effectively opportunities for training with the potential
of children can greatly improve creativity.
Resources are crucial for creativity to develop. Yet excess resources also can
diminish creativity. When everything is comfortable, the desire for novelty turns
to thrills and entertainment, rather than a sharp focus on problem solving. If we
wish to encourage creativity, we have to make sure that material and intellectual
resources are widely available to all talented and interested members of society.
Yet we should realize that a certain amount of hardship, might have a positive
effect on their motivation.
Rewards – both intrinsic and extrinsic – help creativity to blossom. Though few
creative persons are motivated by money, the importance of money cannot be
denied. Money gives relief from worries, and makes more time available for
one’s real work. One can buy necessary materials, hire help if needed, and travel
to meet people from whom one can learn.
Whereas experts in a discipline usually love what they do, beginners see only the
drudgery of the discipline. So one obvious way to enhance creativity is to bring as
much as possible of the flow experience into the various domains. The joy of
discovery needs to be communicated effectively to young people.
14
Each person has, potentially, all the psychic energy needed to lead a creative life. But
there are many obstacles that prevent many from expressing this potential.
Some of us are exhausted by too many demands, and so have trouble activating our
psychic energy in the first place. Or we get easily distracted and find it difficult to
protect and channel whatever energy we have. Other challenges are laziness,
inability to control the flow of energy and not knowing what to do with the energy
one has.
In terms of using mental energy creatively, perhaps the most fundamental difference
between people lies in how much uncommitted attention they have left over to deal
with novelty. When survival needs require all of one’s attention, none is left over for
being creative.
But often the obstacles are internal. Most of us invest bulk of our attention in
monitoring the self, or threats to the ego or in pursuing selfish goals. To free up
creative energy we need to let go and divert some attention from the pursuit of the
predictable goals that we are naturally inclined to pursue and use it instead to
explore the world around us on its own terms.
So the first step toward a more creative life is the cultivation of curiosity and
interest, that is, the allocation of attention to things for their own sake. How can
interest and curiosity be cultivated?
To sustain curiosity, we must learn to enjoy being curious. When there is nothing
specific to do, our thoughts soon return to the most predictable state, which is
randomness or confusion. We pay attention and concentrate when we must – when
dressing, driving the car, or at work. But when there is no external force demanding
that we concentrate, we lose focus. Our mind falls to the lowest energetic state,
where the least amount of effort is required. When this happens, a sort of mental
chaos takes over. Unpleasant thoughts flash into awareness, forgotten regrets
resurface, and we become depressed. Taking refuge in passive entertainment keeps
chaos temporarily at bay, but the attention it absorbs gets wasted. On the other
hand, when we learn to enjoy using our latent creative energy, we not only avoid
depression but also increase the complexity of our capacities to relate to the world.
The author suggests some practical steps here:
One must remain open and focused at the same time. Before we have discovered an
overriding interest in a particular domain, it makes sense to be open to as much of
the world as possible. After we have developed interest, however, it may make more
sense to divert all the energy into that one domain. In either case, the important
thing is not to relinquish control over creative energy so that it dissipates without
direction.
What can we do to build up habits that will make it possible to control attention so
that it can be open and receptive, or focused and directed depending on what the
overall goals require?
Make time for reflection and relaxation. Keeping constantly busy is certainly much
better than indulging in self pity or being lazy. But constant busyness is not a good
prescription for creativity.
Find out what you like and what you hate about life. It is astonishing how little most
of us know about our feelings. There are people who can’t even tell if they are ever
happy, and if they are, when or where. In contrast, creative individuals are in very
close touch with their emotions. They always know the reason for what they are
doing, and they are very sensitive to pain, to boredom, to joy, to interest, and to
other emotions. They are very quick to pack up and leave if they are bored and to
get involved if they are interested. And because they have practiced this skill for a
long time, they need to invest no psychic energy in self-monitoring; they are aware
of their inner states without having to become self-conscious.
Start doing more of what you love, less of what you hate. After a few weeks of self-
monitoring, sit down with your diary or your notes and begin to analyze them.
The only way to stay creative is to organize time, space, and activity to our
advantage. It means developing schedules to protect our time and avoid distraction,
arranging our immediate surroundings to increase concentration, cutting out
meaningless chores that soak up psychic energy, and devoting the energy thus saved
to what we really care about. It is much easier to be personally creative when we
maximize optimal experiences in everyday life.
Personality is nothing but a habitual way of thinking, feeling, and acting, as the more
or less unique pattern by which we use psychic energy or attention. Some traits are
more likely than others to result in personal creativity. To change personality means
to learn new patterns of attention, to look at different things, and to look at them
differently; to learn to think new thoughts, have new feelings about what we
experience.
16
Develop what you lack. All of us specialise, which usually means that we neglect
traits that are complementary to the ones we have developed. Developing multiple
perspectives can enrich our life considerably.
Shift often from openness to closure: Perhaps the most important duality that
creative persons are able to integrate is being open and receptive on the one hand,
and focused and hard-driving on the other.
Aim for complexity. A complex system is differentiated, has many distinctive parts
but it is also a very integrated system. The several parts work together smoothly.
Evolution appears to favour organisms that are complex; i.e., differentiated and
integrated at the same time.
Find a way to express what moves you. Creative problems generally emerge from
areas of life that are personally important.
Look at problems from as many viewpoints as possible. When we know that we have
a problem, consider it from many different perspectives.
Creative individuals do not rush to define the nature of problems. They look at the
situation from various angles first and leave the formulation undetermined for a long
time. They consider different causes and reasons. Because they pause to consider a
greater range of possible explanations for what happens to them, creative people
have a wider and less predictable range of options to choose from.
Figure out the implications of the problems. Creative individuals experiment with a
number of alternative solutions until they are certain that they have found the one
that will work best. As soon as we think of a good solution, we should develop the
habit of thinking of an opposite one. While being quick and consistent is often
desirable, if we wish to be creative, we should be willing to run the risk of sometimes
seeming indecisive.
Personal creativity consists in changing the domain of personal life, of the rules that
constrain psychic energy, the habits and practices that define what we do day in, day
out. If we can dress, work and conduct our relationships more effectively, the quality
of life as a whole will improve.