MaintenanceProgusingReliabilityMethods MSG-3 Issue2
MaintenanceProgusingReliabilityMethods MSG-3 Issue2
Programmes
using Reliability
Methods (MSG-3)
Reference: Issue 2
Date: January 2009
Maintenance Programmes using Reliability Methods (MSG-3) Issue 2
Training Course Synopsis January 2009
Objective
The objective of the course is to discuss the factors that affect preventive
maintenance and to guide delegates through the MSG-3 process. The course is
designed for engineers who need a thorough insight into MSG-3 analysis through to
the production of maintenance schedules. The course will particularly benefit
Reliability and Maintainability Engineers who have to undertake reliability analysis
and produce planned maintenance schedules in both the airlines and civil aircraft
industry.
Method of Presentation
The training course will augment sessions of theory with a series of workshops/Case
Studies. The workshops/Case Studies will represent typical scenarios and will ensure
that practical aspects of the theory are emphasised and clearly understood.
Examples of MSG-3 analysis, from Aircraft Manufacturers, will be present for
discussion.
Page: 1
Maintenance Programmes using Reliability Methods (MSG-3) Issue 2
Training Course Synopsis January 2009
CONTENTS
Topics include:
• History and background to MSG-3 and the MSG process from MSG-1 to
MSG-3 Revision 2007.1
The history and background of MSG and the objectives of an MSG-3 derived
maintenance programme will be discussed along with the relationship between
the three aspects of the process, Aircraft Structures, Systems/Powerplant and
Zonal inspections.
To ensure a firm grip of the basic theory used in reliability engineering, the
course includes with a presentation of the basic methods for reliability
calculation, including failure rate calculations (and MTBF), reliability modelling
using block diagrams, and apportionment.
The requirement for reliability growth testing is expounded and its benefit in
improving equipment’s design is highlighted. The particular aspects relating to
controlling the test environment, determining the nature of failures, and
monitoring the test-analysis-and-fix process are described. The Duane Model
and Smiths Industries/IBM Models are described in relation to monitoring
reliability growth.
Page: 2
Maintenance Programmes using Reliability Methods (MSG-3) Issue 2
Training Course Synopsis January 2009
The MSI selection and evaluation technique and the requirements for a thorough
Functions, Failures, Failure Effects and Causes analysis is discussed along with
the impact such an analysis has on the process as a whole.
The FMEA is a useful tool in identifying the causes of failure and the effects that
the failure has on the function of the MSI. FMEA’s are used extensively in the
design of new equipment, however the FMEA for maintenance purposes are
slightly different in approach. The FMEA used for this purpose is explained and
demonstrated.
The decision logic diagram is introduced and the procedures are explained by
which a maintenance action can satisfy the applicability and effectiveness
criteria. The maintenance programme content is investigated and the ability of
the process to optimise maintenance is illustrated. The use of Threshold
sampling and Age Exploration is discussed as is the formulation and use of a
Zonal Inspection programme.
• Zonal Analysis
The Zonal Analysis process is discussed and demonstrates how the aircraft is
broken down into Zones in accordance with both the ATA 2100 (formally ATA
100) standard and AECMA 1000D standard. The criteria used to develop a
rating system are discussed and an example is demonstrated. The objectives of
a Zonal inspection philosophy are discussed along with additional concepts of
Enhanced Zonals and the introduction of Lightning/High Intensity Radiation Field
(L/HIRF) analysis.
Overview of topics related to Maintenance and the MSG-3 process. How MSG-3
can impact on these topics. Some of these topics include:
Page: 3
Maintenance Programmes using Reliability Methods (MSG-3) Issue 2
Training Course Synopsis January 2009
Page: 4