Lesseon 4: The Human Person in The Environment 4.1: Environmental Philosophy

QUARTER 1- INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON 11
LESSEON 4: THE HUMAN PERSON IN THE

ENVIRONMENT
4.1: ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
Environment philosophy is the discipline that studies the moral relationship of
human beings with the environment and its non-human contents. Philosophers believe that
the human person has the ability to change the environment to suit his purposes. This
means that as human person, we interact not only with our fellow human beings, but also
with other living and non-living elements in our environment. Humankind is a part of the
world, and we significantly affect our environment in the same way that changes in our
environment affect us (Ramos, 2015).
1. Anthropocentrism – focuses on the significant role of humankind in the world
and considers nature as the means by which humans are able to meet their
needs and survive. This view believes that humans are the most important
species on the planet and they are free to transform nature and use its resources.
2. Biocentrism – believes that humans are not the only significant species on the
planet, and that all other organisms have inherent value and should be
protected. This view advocates ethical treatment of animals.
3. Ecocentrism – places great value on ecosystems and biological communities. This
view believes that humankind is a part of a greater biological system or
community and that we have a significant role as stewards or guardians of
nature. This view promotes the idea that order and balance in nature brings
about stability and beauty. The influence of humanity on the environment can be
best understood if we consider the individual person as a dynamic source of
change within his particular environment.
People may treat environment as source of raw materials to be used in any way he
pleases and as something that envelops and surround him thus, have a unique relationship
with it. This means that people can help solve environmental issues and problems. We can
apply our philosophical investigation aesthetically to appreciate our nature. But how can
we aesthetically organize the place that are not in order? Let’s understand the ancient and
modern thinkers’ concepts on how to appreciate nature.
4.2: ENVIRONMENTAL AESTHETICS

A philosophical view that believes in maintaining order in the environment will
bring out the natural beauty of surroundings and contribute to the well-being of the people
and other organisms living in it (Endriga, 2017).
1
SIR ALEX CLASS
4.3: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABILITY
 Environmental Integrity- means that any human activities or economic advances
should not unduly disrupt the environment and human communities located in the
area. The environment should not be drastically impacted by human activities
(Abella, 2016).
 Economic efficiency- this is to ensure that there is minimum to zero waste in using
our natural resources (Abella, 2016).
 Equity- it refers to conserving our natural resources so that the future generations
will still be able to use it (Abella, 2016).
The influence of humanity on the environment can be best understood if we consider the
individual as a dynamic source of change within his/her particular environment. There are
theories that can explain how the humanity address environmental problem. These theories
offers ways to value care, conservation, and preservation of nature and humanity.
THEORIES IN RADICAL ECOLOGICAL PHILOSOPHY
 Deep ecology- Arne Naess, proponent of Deep ecology, assumes that all living things
possess equal value and intrinsic worth regardless of their usefulness or utility to other
beings. This is experiencing ourselves as part of the living earth and finding our role in
protecting the planet. It highlights the shifting away of approaches to environment from
anthropocentrism to ecocentrism (Sioco and Vinzons, 2016).
 Social Ecology- Murray Bookchin, proponent of Social ecology, believes that ecological
problems can be traced to social problems. Societies that are structured around hierarchies
as well as economic classes use their authority to dominate natural resources and exploit
the environment for profit and self-interest. (Sioco and Vinzons, 2016)
 Ecofeminism- It assumes that male-centered view of nature is the root cause of
ecological problems. To address environmental problems humanity has to remove the
superior vs. inferior in human relations. Ecofemimism also believes that a society that
tolerates the oppression of women is directly linked with its tendency to tolerate the abuse
of the environment and the degradation of nature. It also features the existing patriarchal
and capitalist systems in our society as social and economic exploitative to the detrimental
of women and nature. This theory benefits the social and political agenda of both female
and nature. (Sioco and Vinzons, 2016).
4.4: PRUDENCE AND FRUGALITY

How can one lessen the waste he/she is making? How can one be more efficient and
more responsible in using natural resources? These questions can be answered by observing
prudence and frugality towards the environment. Prudence and frugality are two of the
many virtues that can help us in addressing various environmental problems and solving
the challenges these problems have created.
Prudence is the capacity to direct and discipline one’s activities and behavior using
reason. It is the behavior that is cautious and, as much as possible, keeps away from any
risks. Prudence is considered as the first and most vital among the four cardinal virtues,
which include justice, fortitude, and temperance. According to Adam Smith’s The Theory of
Moral Sentiments (1759), a truly righteous person embodies the value of prudence since it
controls one’s overindulgences and as such is vital for a certain society. As St. Thomas
Aquinas argued, prudence is not purely an individual virtue, but concerns the social
dimension too. It means that prudence favors not only the private good of a certain person,
but also the common good. Now, the question is: Is prudence applicable to the challenges
that the various environmental problems have brought? Well, aside from being an
individual virtue, prudence is also considered as an ecological virtue since it implies the
acknowledgement of human finiteness, both moral and physical. Human finiteness is
indivisible from the physical environment, which means that we, vulnerable beings, depend
on a no less fragile and vulnerable natural world, the ultimate source of human well-being
and economic prosperity. Prudence can help us become wiser, more responsible in terms of
using our natural resources and, most importantly, become more appreciative of nature’s
essential value.
On the other hand, frugality is the quality of being thrifty. It is the careful
supervision of one’s resources. Frugality, aside from prudence, is another fundamental
2
SIR ALEX CLASS
value that can help us develop a sense of right and wrong and attain whatever we want in
life. Moreover, it is a virtue that can guide us in making choices in life and receiving the
most value out of those decisions. Commonly, when we talk about frugality, we are talking
about the cautious management of material resources, especially money. A frugal person
always invests time to think carefully just to save a lot of money and, therefore, uses far
less money compare to an affluent person. However, frugality can be used in a wider way to
practically everything in our lives. It can be considered as one of the most important parts
when it comes to carrying on our responsibilities to our community and the world. Now, the
question is: How can frugality help in solving environmental problems? Well, one of the
main benefits of being a frugal person is that it is environmentally friendly. When someone
is being frugal in using natural resources like electricity and water, this person is putting
lesser damage on our natural environment. Furthermore, a frugal person usually lives out
the idea of “reduce, reuse, recycle” just to minimize expenses. Yet, this same idea also
minimizes overall environmental impact. Frugality, just like prudence, plays a big role in
protecting our environment. It finds a great deal of value in lessening one’s use of natural
resources and, at the same time, getting as much value as possible out of the resources that
we are using.
References
Books
Abella, D. (2016). Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person. Quezon City:
C& E Publishing , Inc.
Caraan, A. (2016). Intoduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person. Makati City:
Diwa Learning Systems, Inc.
Corpuz, B., Corpuz, R., Paclibar, M., & Paclibar, S. (2016). Introduction to the
Philosophy of the Human Person. Quezon City, Philippines: Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
Mabaquiao, N. (2016). Making Life Worth Living. An Introduction to the Philosophy
of the Human Person. Quezon City: Phoenix Publishing House.
Ramos, C. (2015). Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person. First
Edition. Rex Bookstore. Quezon City.
Sioco, M. & Vinzons, I. (2016). Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person.
First Edition. Vibal Group, Inc. Quezon City.
3
SIR ALEX CLASS

Lesseon 4: The Human Person in The Environment 4.1: Environmental Philosophy

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lesseon 4: The Human Person in The Environment 4.1: Environmental Philosophy

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lesseon 4: The Human Person in The Environment 4.1: Environmental Philosophy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

QUARTER 1- INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON 11

LESSEON 4: THE HUMAN PERSON IN THE

4.2: ENVIRONMENTAL AESTHETICS

4.3: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

4.4: PRUDENCE AND FRUGALITY

You might also like